BUILT ENVIRONMENT AND HEALTH MODULE

Similar documents
Transit and Physical Activity Studies: Design and Measures Considerations From the TRAC Study

Built Environment and Health in the Age of Big Data

SAFE MAIN STREET HIGHWAYS PART I: WASHINGTON STATE COLLISION DATA AND GEOCODING

What s Health Got to Do With It? Health and Land Use Planning

Focus on New Baseline Conditions, Indicators and Analytic Approaches

Peel Health Initiatives Health and Urban Form

Summary Report: Built Environment, Health and Obesity

Active Travel and Exposure to Air Pollution: Implications for Transportation and Land Use Planning

PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AND TRANSIT CORRIDORS

RESOLUTION NO ?? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NEPTUNE BEACH ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

The best indicator of an individual s and expanding access to parks and open space.

DO OUR NEIGHBORHOODS REALLY MATTER FOR CHILDREN S HEALTH AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY?

BUILDING THE CASE FOR TRAVEL OPTIONS IN WASHING TON COUNTY. Image: Steve Morgan. Image: Steve Morgan


INTEGRATING HEALTH INTO SCENARIO PLANNING

Childhood Obesity: A Policy Perspective

Performance measures for nonmotorized

San Mateo County Comprehensive Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Open House

DRAFT for a State Policy for Healthy Spaces and Places

How Policy Drives Mode Choice in Children s Transportation to School

Lisa Quinn Executive Director

METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN OUTREACH: INTERACTIVE MAP SUMMARY REPORT- 10/03/14

NEWS-CFA: Confirmatory Factor Analysis Scoring for Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale (Updated: March 15, 2011)

A Framework For Integrating Pedestrians into Travel Demand Models

Table A.1. Built Environment Infrastructure Domain Summary

Strategies to Promote the Availability of Affordable Healthy Food and Beverages

Walkable Communities and Adolescent Weight

THESE DAYS IT S HARD TO MISS the story that Americans spend

Complete Streets 101: The Basics

Transportation and Health Tool

MEETING OF THE CITY OF CONCORD BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN AND SAFE ROUTES TO TRANSIT PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA

Catalyst for Change:

Madison Urban Area and Dane County. Bicycle Transportation Plan Summary. September Introduction. Bicycle Plan Scope and Planning Process

Identifying and Prioritizing Biking and Walking Needs

Presentation Summary Why Use GIS for Ped Planning? What Tools are Most Useful? How Can They be Applied? Pedestrian GIS Tools What are they good for?

Sandra Nutter, MPH James Sallis, PhD Gregory J Norman, PhD Sherry Ryan, PhD Kevin Patrick, MD, MS

TR NEWS. Public Health and Transportation. Innovation, Intervention, and Improvements NUMBER 299 SEPTEMBER OCTOBER 2015

12/13/2018 VIA

Built Environment and Older Adults: Supporting Smooth Transitions Across the Life- Span. Dr. Lawrence Frank, Professor and Bombardier UBC

Complete Streets Basics and Benefits

Pedestrian, Bicycle and Traffic Calming Strategic Implementation Plan. January 18, 2011

Health Impact Analysis for Integrated Regional Land Use and Transportation Plan

City of Birmingham Draft Multi-modal Transportation Plan

International Physical Activity Prevalence Study SELF-ADMINISTERED ENVIRONMENTAL MODULE

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION

Introduction Overview This document summarizes the Gateway Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit (Gold Line BRT) health impact assessment (HIA) process and reco


Safe Routes to School Program in California: An Update

Appendix C. Corridor Spacing Research

o n - m o t o r i z e d transportation is an overlooked element that can greatly enhance the overall quality of life for the community s residents.

Analyzing Spatial Patterns, Statistics Based on FAST Act Safety Performance Measures

Cascade Bicycle Club Strategic Plan

Frequently asked questions about how the Transport Walkability Index was calculated are answered below.

Transit-Driven Complete Streets

1. Slide Summary: This course covers methods and best practices used by professional planners, engineers, and consultants/researchers This course

Creating walkable, bikeable and transit-supportive communities in Halton

GIS Based Non-Motorized Transportation Planning APA Ohio Statewide Planning Conference. GIS Assisted Non-Motorized Transportation Planning

9/25/2018. Multi-Modal Level of Service (MMLOS) Bianca Popescu, Transportation Planner

Walkable Communities: National Best Practices and Applications in Memphis, TN

Governor s Transportation Vision Panel

Does It Work? THE BENCHMARKING PROJECT. State Department of Transportation Project Assessment. Bill Wilkinson and Bob Chauncey

The Impact of Transportation on Health: Evidence, Practice and the Case for Mode Shift

Complete streets serve the 1/3 of Hoosiers who do not drive.

Capital and Strategic Planning Committee. Item III - B. April 12, WMATA s Transit-Oriented Development Objectives

2010 Pedestrian and Bicyclist Special Districts Study Update

VISION ZERO: ELIMINATING TRAFFIC DEATHS BY 2024 MARCH 2015

Most Important Part of any Plan

Chapter 14 PARLIER RELATIONSHIP TO CITY PLANS AND POLICIES. Recommendations to Improve Pedestrian Safety in the City of Parlier (2014)

Bicycle and Pedestrian Plans and Improvements

Eastern PA Trail Summit October 1, 2018

Safe Routes to School

May 12, 2016 Metro Potential Ballot Measure Issue Brief: Local Return

FM 1092/Murphy Road Access Management Study Pulic Meeting #1. Wednesday, August 31, :00 p.m. 8:00 p.m.

Kevin Manaugh Department of Geography McGill School of Environment

Sedentary Behavior & Older Adults: The Role of Neighborhood Walkability

NM-POLICY 1: Improve service levels, participation, and options for non-motorized transportation modes throughout the County.

2. Context. Existing framework. The context. The challenge. Transport Strategy

Dr. Lawrence Frank, Professor, University of British Columbia & President, Urban Design 4 Health, Inc.

Introduction. Mode Choice and Urban Form. The Transportation Planner s Approach. The problem

Perceptions of the Physical Environment Surrounding Schools & Physical Activity among Low-income, Urban, African American Adolescent Girls

JEFFERSON COUNTY BIKE PLAN 2010: EMPHASIS SUMMARY

Copyright 2014 Ruizhu Huang

Sistrunk Corridor DOTMOCRACY SUMMARY

WALKNBIKE DRAFT PLAN NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE

ADOT Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Phase IV Activities APPENDIX B PEDESTRIAN DEMAND INDEX

Lane Area Transportation Safety and Security Plan Vulnerable Users Focus Group

Multimodal Connectivity: Walking & Wheeling to Transit

City of Novi Non-Motorized Master Plan 2011 Executive Summary

Agency Advisory Group Meeting #3 and Walk Audit Anchorage Non-Motorized Plan

Measuring Success: Performance Metrics and Project Selection

Approaches. Livable Neighborhood Design. Examples. Traditional neighborhood development. CE 594 University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee

SANTA CLARA COUNTYWIDE BICYCLE PLAN August 2008

Neighborhood Environment Profiles Related to Physical Activity and Weight Status among Seniors: A Latent Profile Analysis

APPENDIX D. May 22, 2002 Open House Summary and Materials

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary. MEAD Number:

CONNECTING PEOPLE TO PLACES

162 RESIDENTS ATTENDED 2 DAYS OF WORKSHOPS 15 TABLE DISCUSSIONS WHAT WE HEARD. Oakridge Municipal Town Centre Workshops PLANNING PROGRAM

Health Beyond Healthcare The Chronic Disease Impacts of Neighborhood Design. Erik J. Aulestia, AICP Principal, Torti Gallas + Partners

Incorporating Health in Regional Transportation Planning

Incorporating Health in Regional Transportation Planning

Transcription:

Interdisciplinary Program for the PhD in Urban Design and Planning BUILT ENVIRONMENT AND HEALTH MODULE 2011 Symposium April 29, 2011 1

CONTENTS Handouts Main research question Interactions between built environment and health outcomes Examples and policy implications Pedagogy Strengths Data and projects 2

IN YOUR HANDOUTS Students Staff Main faculty Area of research and grants 3

RESEARCH QUESTION How does the built environment affect human behavior, life style/choices, and consequently health enhancing behaviors? 4

EXAMPLES OF HEALTH EFFECTS OF THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT Transport infrastructure/walkability/access -> physical activity; eating; obesity; CVD; diabetes; cancers; injury Air quality -> asthma, cancers Noise -> hearing loss; stress; inattention; sleep; CVD

BUILT ENVIRONMENT-BEHAVIOR INTERACTIONS Domains of interest Use of environment (selective, time sensitive) Exposure/access to environment (unavoidable, time and intensity sensitive) Density of environmental attributes Proximity to environmental attributes Confounders (demographic and socioeconomic factors) Access INDIVIDUAL ENVIRONMENT [social or built] Exposure 6

POLICY IMPLICATIONS If the use of and exposure/access to certain environmental features affects health, what are the policy changes that planners could help address? Examples Make neighborhoods more walkable (reduce distances between destinations, improve non-motorize infrastructure, mitigate vehicular traffic impacts, etc.) Incentivize certain food and physical activity establishments to locate in neighborhoods Reduce local level air and water pollution, environmental noise 7

PEDAGOGY Students are part of an interdisciplinary team Team consists of faculty with different areas of expertise Other consultants (including sponsoring agencies) Staff Students from other UW units (Epidemiology, Geography, Demography, etc.) Synergy between different research grants (similar data, analytic approaches, etc.) Students work at all levels of research (data development, analyses, publications, contacts with sponsors) Student dissertations are a piece of the larger team work They co-author ~2+ papers during their studies, and publish ~2 papers as first author based on their dissertation 8

STRENGTHS RESEARCH CONTEXT Health related behaviors Built environment 9

HEALTH RELATED BEHAVIORS Data sources (mostly primary) Surveys (reported) Accelerometers (objective) GPS (objective) Variable selection Measurements 10

Seattle Obesity Study (SOS) 2,000 surveys (30-min) 700 food frequency questionnaires Food shopping locations Food costs and expenses Diet 11

TRAC STUDY Home locations Accelerometer and GPS data 736 participants 5,195 days (7 days /participant) 12,598 activity bouts An activity bout contains at least 5 minutes of walk epochs (where the accelerometer count > 500 for 30 seconds) during a 7 minute window 2,778 hours of activity bouts

~ 2,000 pairs in WA Up to 10, 000 in US TWIN REGISTRY Locations in WA State ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE MEASURES Neighborhood walkability (5) Deprivation Crime Traffic Sprawl 13

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL (SRTS) Washington Mississippi Wisconsin Texas Florida ~890 schools funded out of 19,000 14

OBJECTIVE MEASURES OF BEHAVIOR IN TIME AND SPACE Figure 7: Example of food entry program (right) and energy balance interface (left) as viewed on the phone. 15

GPS TRACES WITH ACCELEROMETER AND TRAVEL LOG DATA 16

BUILT ENVIRONMENT Conceptual models Data sources Measures typically include counts, densities, and distances between features of interest. Both airline and network measures are calculated 17

BUILT ENVIRONMENT SPATIAL UNITS OF DATA CAPTURE AND ANALYSIS Public parcel data are 300 to 30,000 times finer than the resolution of area-based data 18

BUILT ENVIRONMENT DATA King Co Domains Variables* Number of discrete observations Neighborhood environment Routine destinations residential units (houses, apartments, condos, mobile homes) employment/jobs residential wealth (property values) vacant lands food facilities (stores versus restaurants, healthy versus unhealthy) physical activity and fitness facilities retail services schools and educational facilities offices medical offices public services (libraries, etc) open space and parks facilities in parks 489k parcels 21k parcels 489k parcels 51k parcels 1,500 food stores 6,500 restaurants 880 parcels 5652 parcels 737 parcels 4393 parcels 769 parcels 1541 parks 103 types of facilities per park 19

BUILT ENVIRONMMENT DATA King Co Domains Variables* Number of discrete observations Transportation infrastructure street (freeways and expressways, arterials, collector and local streets) 14k linear miles intersection density trails sidewalks 64k intersections 829 linear miles 1708 linear miles Traffic conditions traffic signals parking passenger rail stations bus stops vehicular volumes bus ridership pedestrian/bike collisions 2000 signals 2.7 million stalls 17 stations 8635 stops 86 million daily vehicle-miles 364k daily trips 1150 annual collisions 20

SPATIAL DATA DEVELOPMENT Example: sampling for RECRUITMENT SR 520 users 21

KFFI - BENCHMARKING ACCESS TO FOOD AND FITNESS Transit: ENVIRONMENT VS. BEHAVIOR

SOS STUDY SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF BMI Moran s I clusters 23

High-cost supermarket Low-cost supermarket FOOD DESERTS IN KING CO Ten-minute walk Ten-minute bicycling Ten-minute riding transit Ten-minute driving 24

END 25

MARINA S SUGGESTIONS for questions Questions for Panels: What is unique about our program intellectual focus? What are our strengths? What potential synergies exist among the areas of specialization? How can we productively build on our strengths and emerging tensions among diverse perspectives? What are the implications for our program structure and pedagogy? Questions for panelists How do you and your students fit into the program? What are emerging research agendas and approaches? What are the cross cutting questions? What are the implications for the pedagogy? Suggestions for panel chairs: Chair the entire discussion, make sure the panel discussion stays focused on the questions. Role of discussant John Friedmann: Ask John to help us reflect on our questions, be our mirror, provide an external feedback, help us reach a synthesis of our discussion. - Ask him what kind of information he would like to have in advance to help us in the discussion. Perhaps supply with some tailored information in advance. 26

THIS SLIDE WILL NOT BE SHOWN this is a summary of presentation, as per my recent email "Several of our doctoral students have been and are currently involved in research on the interaction between built environment and health. There are several on-going projects funded mostly by multi-year NIH grants that enable students to focus on measuring the built environment in a GIS environment and to conduct analyses on environmental influences on health. Environmental data are available at the scale of the parcel or tax lot for King County and are also being developed at the state level, which enable detailed individual-level analyses of environment and behavior. Students have the opportunity to become familiar with and to develop advanced methods in geospatial data development and spatial analyses (List students at the UFL and other collaborating entities along with their area of focus). The research seeks to untangle the effect of various environmental exposures on health outcomes. Active travel, physical activity, and walking as a popular means of being active have long been the focus of this research (List/describe projects ranging from WBC, Balance, Trac, Twins, Small towns, etc.). This research came out of past research on "non-motorized" transportation carried out with the Wash State Dept of Transportation. A somewhat newer area of research is on the food environment and specifically access to healthy and affordable foods. Work on environments that are supportive of active life styles and facilitate access to food allows us to contribute to many aspects of obesity research (List/ describe UWCOR, SOS I and II, Balance). Most exciting is our current use of accelerometers and GPS to track activity in time and space. TBD 27

MAIN FACULTY Bae, Christine, UDP Born, Branden, UDP Drewnowski, Adam, EPIDEMIOLOGY Duncan, Glen, EPIDEMIOLOGY Hallenbeck, Mark, TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING Moudon, Anne Vernez, UDP Saelens, Brian, MEDICINE & CHILDREN S HOSPITAL RESEARCH 28

STUDENTS AND STAFF Ruizhu Huang Bumjoon Kang Jared Ulmer Jason Scully Sora Baek Phil Hurvitz, PhD (Research Associate) Junfeng Jiao, PhD (Research Associate) Lin Lin, PhD (Research Associate) Orion Stewart, MUP (Research Scientist) Melissa Munsell, MUP (Research Scientist) 29

UFL PROJECTS: HEALTH Health, Physical Activity, Walking Health, Energy Balance, Obesity PROJECTS DOCTORA Geographic Extent Observations L Instruments Date Research Focus Sponsor /PI STUDENT WBC King County UGB 600 respondents Trac Twins Small Town Walkability Balance NIDDK (SOS) HURVITZ, ULMER, BUMJOO N JIAO RUIZHU. MUNSELL SCULLY,S TEWART HURVITZ. STEWART HURVITZ, ULMER, JIAO King County 700 respondents @ 3 data collection times Washington, other states 9 towns in New England, Texas, Washington 10,000 twin pairs 1,800 respondents Surveys 2001-05 Surveys, 2008- Accelerometers 13, GPS, Travel Logs Surveys 2009-12 Surveys (subsample withh Accelerometers, GPS, Travel Logs) King County NA Multi Sensor Board Incl GPS (MSB), cell phone with dietary intake King County 2,000 respondents 2010-13 2007-10 Surveys 2008-11 Probabilities of WALKING for health Effects of light rail on PHYSICAL ACTIVITY WALKABILITY and health Probabilities of WALKING for health Objective measures of ENERGY intake and expenditure Obesity and ACCESS TO FOOD Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDCS) (Moudon PI) 2001-2004, Walk and Bike Communities Project. National Institutes of Health (Saelens PI) 2008-13. The effect of light rail transit on physical activity: a natural experiment. National Institutes of Health (Buchwald PI) 2009-11 Building a Unique National Community Based Twin Registry. National Institutes of Health (Doescher PI) 2010-13. Rural town walkability: measuring the effect of the built environment National Institutes of Health (Duncan PI) 2007-10. Bioengineering Approaches to Energy Balance and Obesity. National Institutes of Health (Drewnowski PI) 2008-11. Food environment, diet quality, and disparities in obesity. Seattle Obesity Study (SOS) 30

UFL PROJECTS: Transportation Walking and Bicycling PROJECTS DOCTORAL STUDENT Geographic Extent Observations Instrumen ts Date Research Focus Sponsor /PI Land Use and Pedestrian Travel Puget Sound Four Counties NA NA 1995-2004 A number of methodologies to identify LOCATIONS and AREAS more likely to support PEDESTRIAN TRAVEL US and Washington State Departments of Transportation, (Moudon PI). Pedestrian Location Identification Tools, Transportation-Efficient Land Use Mapping Index Pedestrian Safety LIN, JIAO King County ~14,000 pedestrian and bicyclist collisions in WA State 200-2004 Police records 2004-08 Risk of COLLISION and severe INJURY/FATALITY US and Washington State Departments of Transportation, (Moudon PI). Pedestrian Safety SRTS LIN, STEWART Florida, Mississippi, Texas, Washington, Wisconsin, ~ 900 SRTS schools (~19,000 public schools) Surveys, Case studies 2008-2011 Children WALKING and BIKING to school US and Washington State Departments of Transportation, Transportation Pooled Funds (Moudon PI) 2008-2011. Safe Routes to School, Statewide Mobility Assessment Study. 31

UFL Built environment (BE) data by domain and variable of interest (data structure and sources) Domains Variables* Data structure, and original data sources Neighborhood environment Routine destinations Transportation infrastructure Traffic conditions Number of discrete observations residential units (houses, apartments, parcels, county assessor s office 489k parcels condos, mobile homes) employment/jobs parcels, UFL 21k parcels residential wealth (property values) parcels, county assessor s office 489k parcels vacant lands parcels, county assessor s office 51k parcels food facilities (stores versus restaurants, healthy versus unhealthy) parcels, food permits from Public Health Seattle King Co 1,500 food stores 6,500 restaurants physical activity and fitness facilities parcels, InfoUSA 880 parcels retail services parcels, county assessor s office 5652 parcels schools and educational facilities 737 parcels parcels, county assessor s office, National Center for Educational Statistics offices parcels, county assessor s office 4393 parcels medical offices parcels, county assessor s office 769 parcels public services (libraries, etc) parcels, county assessor s office open space and parks parcels, UFL 1541 parks facilities in parks within each park 103 types of facilities per park street (freeways and expressways, networks, King Co GIS 14k linear miles ESRI StreetMap Premium North America NAVTEQ arterials, collector and local streets) intersection density points, UFL 64k intersections trails networks, King Co GIS 829 linear miles sidewalks networks, UFL 1708 linear miles traffic signals points, King Co GIS 2000 signals parking rasters, UFL 2.7 million stalls passenger rail stations points, UFL 17 stations bus stops King Co Metro 8635 stops vehicular volumes networks, Puget Sound Regional Council 86 million daily vehicle-miles bus ridership King Co Metro 364k daily trips pedestrian/bike collisions points, Washington State DOT 1150 annual collisions * measures typically include counts, densities, and distances between features of interest. Both airline and network measures are calculated; UFL = data already has been collected by the UW Urban Form Lab

Domains Variables* Data structure, and original data sources Neighborhood environment Routine destinations Transportation infrastructure Traffic conditions Number of discrete observations residential units (houses, apartments, parcels, county assessor s office 489k parcels condos, mobile homes) employment/jobs parcels, UFL 21k parcels residential wealth (property values) parcels, county assessor s office 489k parcels vacant lands parcels, county assessor s office 51k parcels food facilities (stores versus restaurants, healthy versus unhealthy) parcels, food permits from Public Health Seattle King Co 1,500 food stores 6,500 restaurants physical activity and fitness facilities parcels, InfoUSA 880 parcels retail services parcels, county assessor s office 5652 parcels schools and educational facilities 737 parcels parcels, county assessor s office, National Center for Educational Statistics offices parcels, county assessor s office 4393 parcels medical offices parcels, county assessor s office 769 parcels public services (libraries, etc) parcels, county assessor s office open space and parks parcels, UFL 1541 parks facilities in parks within each park 103 types of facilities per park street (freeways and expressways, networks, King Co GIS 14k linear miles ESRI StreetMap Premium North America NAVTEQ arterials, collector and local streets) intersection density points, UFL 64k intersections trails networks, King Co GIS 829 linear miles sidewalks networks, UFL 1708 linear miles traffic signals points, King Co GIS 2000 signals parking rasters, UFL 2.7 million stalls passenger rail stations points, UFL 17 stations bus stops King Co Metro 8635 stops vehicular volumes networks, Puget Sound Regional Council 86 million daily vehicle-miles bus ridership King Co Metro 364k daily trips pedestrian/bike collisions points, Washington State DOT 1150 annual collisions * measures typically include counts, densities, and distances between features of interest. Both airline and network measures are calculated; UFL = data already has been collected by the UW Urban Form Lab 33

34