The Complete Stability Testing for a Successful Application. Strategies

Similar documents
Public Assessment Report. Scientific discussion. Dutasteride Regiomedica 0.5 mg capsules, soft (dutasteride) NL/H/2861/001/DC.

Guidance for Industry

Study Management SM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR Interactions with the Institutional Review Board (IRB)

Hazard and risk analysis in pharmaceutical products 1

Linezolid 600 mg Tablets WHOPAR part 6 February 2017 (Hetero Labs Limited), TB299

USP <797> LABELING ESTABLISHING BEYOND-USE DATES AND IN-USE TIMES

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD CONTINUING REVIEW AND REAPPROVAL OF RESEARCH

University of Cincinnati. Radiation Safety Committee Operations Guidelines Statement of Policy (RSC Guidelines) RSC Guidelines (revision 5)

SITE NAME: ISF DOCUMENT VERSION CHECKLIST Complete yes or no to confirm the presence or absence of each document specified.

GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE GUIDE PART I FOR MEDICAL GASES

INSPECTION OF MEDICINAL GASES

Public Assessment Report Scientific discussion. Lung test gas CO (He) AGA, 0.28%, inhalation gas, compressed (carbon monoxide, helium) SE/H/1154/01/MR

23 November Exposure Scenario-related information for mixtures

Quality Control and Quality Assurance at the Mill. Philip Randall Tanzania 5 th April 2011

BBS Fall Conference, 16 September Use of modeling & simulation to support the design and analysis of a new dose and regimen finding study

LABELLING OF MEDICAL GAS CONTAINERS

02 November, 2017 Moderated by Bryan Crist Agilent Technologies

11 May, 2017 Moderated by Bryan Crist Agilent Technologies

CASE STUDY ON RISK ASSESSMENTS FOR CROSS CONTAMINATION. Stephanie Wilkins, PE EMA Workshop June 2017

OHRP Guidance on Written IRB Procedures

CONTINUING REVIEW 3/7/2016

Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD CONTINUING REVIEW OF RESEARCH

SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS

Discussion and guidance on the definition and qualification of porous loads

Focus Medicine by the gallon: An industry complying with specific pharmaceutical and industrial legislation

What s New in GCP? FDA, OHRP Issue Harmonized Guidance on Transferring IRB Oversight of Clinical Studies

Date Effective 4/21/2008 Identification

Section 3-5: Principle 3: Determine Critical Limits

Chapter 4 Institutional Review Board (IRB) Roles and Authorities

Signature Date Date First Effective: Signature Date Revision Date:

3M Steri-Vac Sterilizer/Aerator GSX Series. For Life Science Applications. Product. Profile

IRB MEETING ADMINISTRATION

Dev Food Industry. Procedure for HACCP Plan. To establish and maintain a uniform approach to establish HACCP Plan.

Safety Data Sheet according to (EC) No 1907/2006

Justification of Risk Reduction through In-Service Inspection / REDUCE

2018 REGULATIONS AND QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR ATHLETES AND HORSES COMPETING IN CCI S, CIC S AND UNIFIED FORMAT EVENTS

Investigator Manual. If you have questions about whether an activity requires IRB review, contact the IRB Office.

Control Charting: Lessons Learned Along the Way Why, What, and How

SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS. 1 NAME OF THE MEDICINAL PRODUCT Lung test gas, CO/He AGA 0.28%, 9.3% medicinal gas, compressed

Characterization and formulation of cocrystals

Initial Review. Approved By: Michele Kennett, JD, MSN, LLM Associate Vice Chancellor for Research. Table of Contents

Modeling Approaches to Increase the Efficiency of Clear-Point- Based Solubility Characterization

SHORT- AND LONG- TERM MODELLING IN SUPPORT OF SEA LICE BATH TREATMENTS AZAMETHIPHOS, CYPERMETHRIN AND DELTAMETHRIN

SOP 407: PROTOCOL DEVIATIONS AND UNANTICIPATED PROBLEMS

Health Products Regulatory Authority

PIQCS HACCP Minimum Certification Standards

Supersedes Document Dated: 7/7/11. SOP: RR 401 Version No.: 07 Version Date: 9/8/15 EXPEDITED REVIEW 1. POLICY

STD-3-V1M4_1.7.1_AND_ /15/2015 page 1 of 6. TNI Standard. EL-V1M4 Sections and September 2015

Ceded IRB Review. The University of Arizona has standing agreements in place for the following entities regarding ceded IRB review:

E. Agu, M. Kasperski Ruhr-University Bochum Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Sciences

Clinical Study Synopsis

Carbon Dioxide Flooding. Dr. Helmy Sayyouh Petroleum Engineering Cairo University

SEMLATA3-12 Measuring, weighing and preparing compounds and solutions for laboratory use

Human Research Protections Program Medical College of Wisconsin and Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital

Procedure Department: HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTIONS PROGRAM Policy Number: II.B.1

Annex 8. Guidelines on heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems for non-sterile pharmaceutical products. Background. Summary of main changes

Second Quarter 2018 Results Call Corporate Update & Financial Results. August 7, 2018

Developing a HACCP plan

RESEARCH SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

SAFETY DATA SHEET according to Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006

SKAC25 Operate plant to maintain the quality of pool water

Distributed Control Systems

MIXER - GRANULATOR - BLENDER

MDEP Common Position No AP

Ceded IRB Review. The project involves prisoners or other vulnerable populations that require special considerations.

Public Assessment Report. Berinert. C1-Esterase-Inhibitor, human DE/H/0481/001/MR. Applicant: CSL Behring GmbH. Date of Report:

Systems of Accounting for and Control of Nuclear Material

Implementation of HACCP based procedures. Tom Kennedy

CODE OF PRACTICE 42 IMPLEMENTATION OF EIGA CARBON DIOXIDE STANDARDS REVISION 2: 2018

MINE SAFETY TARGETED ASSESSMENT PROGRAM. Ground or strata failure NSW metalliferous mines. April

Agilent Dimension Software for ELSD User Manual

Independent Ethics Committees

UN/SCETDG/54/INF.13 UN/SCEGHS/36/INF.10

Summary Safety Investigation Report

Laboratory and Satellite Rodent Housing

Int r oduct ion t o Int egr it y Tes t ing Theor y

USE OF THE EXCEEDANCE CURVE APPROACH IN OCCUPIED BUILDING RISK ASSESSMENT

SOP 801: Investigator Qualifications and Responsibilities

Quality Assurance Charting for QC Data

Bikeability Grants Grant Application Guidance. Moving Britain Ahead

ANCHORING REQUIREMENTS FOR LARGE CONTAINER SHIPS

Bioequivalence: Saving money with generic drugs

EMERGENCY USE 03/02/2016

BSBWHS404A Contribute to WHS hazard identification, risk assessment and risk control Learning Guide

Safety Data Sheet according to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006

PROTOCOL FOR COMPRESSED AIR PROFICIENCY TESTING (CAPT) PROGRAM SAMPLE ANALYSIS

Adiabatic Calorimetry

Inspection Credit for PWSCC Mitigation via Peening Surface Stress Improvement

University of Iowa External/Central IRB Reliance Process Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)

7.0 DEVIATION and EXCEPTION of a PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PROTOCOL

QC for Hydrographic Data GEOSECS to GO-SHIP. Susan M. Becker Scripps Institution of Oceanography Oceanographic Data Facility

A Conceptual Approach for Using the UCF Driving Simulator as a Test Bed for High Risk Locations

Air Handling Unit (AHU) Air handling unit which serves to condition the air and provide the required air movement within a facility.

I. Summary. II. Responsibilities

Pearls of Wisdom. Debra Herzan, Josh Lachewitz, Kurombi Wade-Oliver Alliance Chicago Office. May 2015

By: Roger Ruan. University. Partners:

Current Status: Active PolicyStat ID: Origination: 04/2018 Effective: 04/2018 Approved: 04/2018 Last Revised: 04/2018 Expiration: 04/2021

A SIMPLE TITRATION METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE SPECIFIC GRAVITY ON ONE DROP OF URINE

Organisation Management Services (OMS) operating model

Transcription:

The Complete Staility Testing for a Successful Application, Requirements, Basic Principles Performance, Documents 1

Introduction Ojectives To secure the registration application and the successful marketing authorisation - in the shortest period of time, - In the most efficient way To apply all relevant guidelines and adapt them accordingly during the stage of development To include the whole process of development from the preliminary experiments with the drug sustance to the continuous production of the drug product. To have an efficient procedure applicale to each stage of development To ase the quality, efficacy and safety of the finished medicinal product on the results of - Preclinical experiments, - Clinical samples, - Primary registration atches To guarantee the patient after marketing authorisation the same quality as the patient during the clinical trial investigations ICH Harmonised Guidelines Numer Guideline Status Q1A (R2) Staility Testing of New sustances and Products Step 5 Q1B Photostaility Testing of New Sustances and Products Step 5 Q1C Staility testing, Requirements for New Dosage Forms Step 5 Q1D Bracketing and Matrixing Designs for Staility Testing of New Sustances and products Step 5 Q1E Evaluation of Staility Data Step 4 Q1F Staility Data Package for Registration in climatic zones III and IV Step 4 Q2A Validation of Analytical Methods. Definitions and Terminology Step 5 Q2B Validation of Analytical Procedures: Methodology Step 5 Q3A(R) Impurities Testing Guideline: Impurities in New Drug Sustances Step 5 Q3B(R) Impurities in New Drug Products Step 4 Q3C Impurities: Residual solvents Step 5 Q6A M4 Specifications: Test Procedures and Acceptance Criteria for new Drug Sustances and Drug Products: Chemical Sustances Common Technical Document for the Registration of Pharmaceuticals for human use: Organisation of CTC Step 5 Step 5 M4Q CTD Quality Overall Summary and CTD Quality Step 5 2

3

CPMP Note for Guidance Numer Guidelines Date for coming into Operation CPMP/QWP/159/96 CPMP/QWP/576/96 CPMP/QWP/2934/99 Maximum Shelf-life for Sterile Products for Human Use after first opening or following reconstitution Staility Testing for a Type II Variation to a Marketing Authorisation In-Use Staility Testing of Human Medical Products July 1998 Octoer 1998 Septemer 2001 CPMP/QWP/30015/96 Parametric Release Septemer 2001 CPMP/QWP/072/96 CPMP/QWP/609/96/ Rev 1 Start of Shelf-Life of the Finished Dosage Form Declaration of storage Conditions for Medicinal Products in the Products Particulars and Active Sustances Decemer 2001 March 2002* CPMP/QWP/122/02 Staility Testing of Existing Active Sustances and related Finished Products * These dates refer to deadlines for comments Decemer 2002 4

6 Steps of Development Step Analytical Development and Staility Testing 1 Stress- and accelerated testing with the drug sustance 2 Preformulation and formulation finding for: toxicological samples clinical trial samples final dosage form 3 Stress- and accelerated testing with selected formulations: toxicological samples clinical trial samples final formulation registration atches Selection of container closure system up-scaling, pilot-plant 4 Accelerated and Long-Term Staility Testing with registration atches up to registration application: drug sustance drug product Transfer of analytical procedures to quality control 5 On-going Staility Testing with registration and production atches drug sustance drug product 6 Follow-up Staility Testing continuous production variations and changes during continuous production 5

The 11 Basic Principles Selection of Batches and Samples Test Attriutes Analytical Procedures Specifications, Acceptance Criteria Storage Conditions Storage Period Testing Frequency Numer of Batches Container Closure System Evaluation Statements/Laelling 6

Basic principles Step 1 Stress- and accelerated testing with the drug sustance Step 2 Preformulation and formulation finding Step 3 Stress-and accelerated testing with selected formulations, up-scaling Step 4 Accelerated and Long- Term Staility Testing up to registration application Step 5 On-going Staility Testing Step 6 Follow-up Staility Testing Selection of atches and samples experimental atch experimental laoratory atches experimental and clinical atches, representative pilot-plant atches representative pilot plant atches representative pilot plant and production atches representative and experimental atches Test attriutes corresponding to ojective corresponding to ojective corresponding to ojective corresponding to results of step 1 3 as for step 4 as for step 4 Analytical procedures staility indicating, preliminary validation staility indicating, orientational validation staility indicating, orientational and preliminary validation staility indicating, completely validated as for step 4 staility indicating, completely validated or revalidation Acceptance Criteria Specifications orientational acceptance criteria orientational acceptance criteria preliminary Release and shelf life Acceptance criteria Proposed for registration Post approval release and shelf life acceptance criteria Post approval release and shelf life acceptance criteria Storage conditions 25 C/60 % 25 C/75 % 30 C/70 % 40 C/75 % 40 C,50 C,60,70 C 5 C 25 C/60 % 30 C/65 % 30 C/35% 40 C/75 % 40 C, 60 C - 20 C - 10 C 5 C 25 C/60 % 30 C/65 % 30 C/35% 40 C/25% 40 C/75 % 40 C, 50 C, 60 C, 70 C - 20 C 5 C 25 C/60 % 30 C/65 % 30 C/35% 40 C/25% 40 C/75 % - 20 C 5 C 25 C/60 % 30 C/65 % 30 C/35% 40 C/25% 40 C/75 % - 20 C 5 C 25 C/60 % 30 C/65 % 30 C/35% 40 C/25% 40 C/75 % 7

Basic principles Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Testing frequency 0, 1, 2, 3 months depending on prolem depending on prolem 0, 1, 2, 3, (6) months 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, (18) months (18), 24, 36, 48, 60 months 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60 months 0, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months 0, 1, 2, 3, 6 months Storage period up to 3 months depending on prolem up to 3 months up to 6 months up to 12 or 18 months up to 60 months up to 60 months up to 6 months Numer of atches 1 to 2 depending on prolem depending on prolem 1 3 3 3 1 per year 1-3 Container Closure System open, standard packaging material depending on prolem standard packaging material depending on prolem standard packaging material commercial container closure system commercial container closure system commercial container closure system standard packaging material 8

Basic principles Evaluation Statements/ Laelling Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Statistics, Reaction kinetics, Staility report as drug sustance staility profile Preliminary testing specification for staility testing of drug sustance preliminary Re-Test Period Storage instructions Selected test attriutes for long-term testing Orientational shelf life predictions for drug products Statistics, Reaction kinetics,, Research reports Orientational testing specifications Formulation selection Statistics, Reaction kinetics Staility report and preliminary testing specification for release and staility testing of - toxicological samples - clinical trial samples - final dosage form Period of use - toxicological samples - clinical samples phase I - III Shelf life prediction final dosage form Storage instructions Selection of container closure system Selection of test attriutes for longterm testing Statistics, Reaction kinetics, Staility report drug sustance Testing specification for staility testing of drug sustance Validation report Staility report drug product Testing specification for release and staility testing of drug product Validation report Re-test period prediction Shelf life prediction storage instructions in-use staility holding time for intermediates and ulk Statistics, Staility report Post approval specifications Confirmation and extension of re-test period Confirmation and extension of shelf life Statistics, Reaction kinetics Staility report Confirmation of re-test period Confirmation of shelf life assessment of variations 9

Nummer 3.2.S 3.2.S.1 3.2.S.1.1 Thema Drug Sustance General Information Nomenclature Drug Sustance Entwicklungsanalytik Stailitätsprüfung 3.2.S.1.2 Structure 3.2.S.1.3 General Properties Q6Q 3.2.S.2 3.2.S.2.1 3.2.S.2.2 Manufacture Manufacturer(s) Description of Manufacturing Process And Process Controls 3.2.S.2.3 Control of Materials Q6A 3.2.S.2.4 3.2.S.2.5 Controls of Critical Steps and Intermediates Process Validation and/or Evaluation Referenz ICH Q6A 3.2.S.2.6 Manufacturing Process Development Q3AR 3.2.S.3 3.2.S.3.1 Characterisation Elucidation of structure and other Characteristics Q6A 3.2.S.3.2 Impurities Q3AR,Q3C,Q6A 3.2.S.4 Control of Drug Sustance 3.2.S.4.1 Specification Q6A 3.2.S.4.2 Analytical Procedures Q2A,Q6A 3.2.S.4.3 Validation of Analytical Procedures Q2A,Q2B, 3.2.S.4.4 Batch Analyses Q3AR,Q3C,Q6A 3.2.S 4.5 Justification of Specification Q3AR,Q3C,Q6A 3.2.S.5 Reference Standards of Materials Q6A 3.2.S.6 Container Closure System 3.2.S.7 Staility 3.2.S.7.1 Staility Summary and Conclusions Q1AR,Q1B, Q1E, Q1F 3.2.S.7.2 Post-Approval staility Protocol and Q1AR Staility Commitment 3.2.S.7.3 Staility Data Q1AR, Q1B, Q1D, Q1F, Q1B,Q2A, Q2B 10

Drug Product Nummer Thema Entwicklungsanalytik Stailitätsprüfung 3.2.P 3.2.P.1 Drug Product Description and Composition of the Drug Product Referenz ICH Q6A 3.2.P.2 Pharmaceutical Development Q6A 3.2.P.2.1 Components of the Drug Product 3.2.P.2.1.1 Drug Sustance 3.2.P.2.1.2 Excipients 3.2.2.2 Drug Product 3.2.P.2.2.1 Formulation Development 3.2.P.2.2.2 Overages 3.2.P.2.2.3 Physicochemical and Biological Properties 3.2.P.2.3 Manufacturing Process Development 3.2.P.2.4 Container Closure System 3.2.P.2.5 Microiological Attriutes 3.2.P.2.6 Compatiility 3.2.P.3 Manufacture 3.2.P.3.1 3.2.P.3.2 3.2.P.3.3 3.2.P.3.4 Manufacturer(s) Batch Formula Description of Manufacturing Process and Process Controls Controls of Critical Steps and Intermediates 3.2.P.3.5 Process Validation and/or Evaluation 3.2.P.4 Control of Excipients 3.2.P.4.1 Specifications Q6A Q2A, Q2B, Q6A 3.2.P.4.2 Analytical Procedures Q2A,Q6A 3.2.P.4.3 Validation of Analytical Procedures 3.2.P.4.4 Justification of Specifications Q3C 3.2.P. 4.5 Excipients of Human or Animal Q6B Origin 3.2.P.4.6 Novel Excipients Q2A, Q2B 3.2.P.5 Control of Drug Product 3.2.P.5.1 Specification(s) Q3B,Q6A 3.2.P.5.2 Analytical Procedures Q2A,Q6A 11

3.2.P.5.3 Validation of Analytical Q2A,Q2B Procedures 3.2.P.5.4 Batch Analyses Q3BR, Q3C,Q6A 3.2.P.5.5 Characterization of Impurities Q3BR, Q6A 3.2.P.5.6 Justification of Specification(s) Q3BR, Q6A 3.2.P.6 Reference Standards or Materials Q6A 3.2.P.7 3.2.P.8 Container Closure System Staility 3.2.P.8.1 Staility Summary and Conclusion Q1AR, Q1B, Q1D, Q1E. Q1F Q2A, Q2B, 3.2.P.8.2 Post-approval Staility Protocol and Staility Commitment Q1AR, 3.2.P.8.3 Staility Data Q1AR, Q1B, Q1D, Q1E. Q1F Q2A, Q2B, 3.2.R Regional Information 3.3 Literature References 12

Overview of the documents which result during the development Step of Dev. Document Needed for Common Technical Document CTD 1 Staility report : Preliminary Staility Profile of Drug Sustance Staility report: Staility profile of Drug sustance TS 1 for Staility Testing of Drug Sustance, No. 1 2 TS for Staility Testing Drug Product, No. 1 Development Report Compatiility 3 Staility Report: Toxicological Samples Staility Report: Clinical Samples Phase I Staility Report: Clinical Samples Phase II Staility Report: Clinical Samples Phase III Staility Report: Staility Profile of Drug Product TS for Release and Staility Testing Drug Product, Nr. 2 TS for Release and Staility Testing Drug Product, Nr. 3/5 TS for Cleaning Validation TS for Intermediates Drug Product TS for Release and Staility Testing Drug Product, Nr. 6 Development Report Up-Scaling Preformulation Regist. Appl. 2 Regist. Appl. 3.2.S.7.1, 3.2..S.7.3 3.2.S.4.2 Base for further development Compatiility 3.2.P.2.6 GLP IND, CTX IND, CTX IND, CTX GLP IND, CTX, GMP GMP, Reg. Appl. Development Manuf. Procedure 3.2.P.8.1, 3.2.P.8.3 3.2.P.8.1, 3.2.P.8.3 3.2.P.5.2 3.2.P.3.4 3.2.P.5.2 3.2.P.2.3 Guidelines Q1AR2, Q1B Q1AR2, Q1B Q2A, Q2B. Q3AR Q1D Q1AR2, Q1B, Q1D Q1AR2, Q1B, Q1D Q6A Q2A, Q2B, Q3BR, Q3C, Q6A Q2A, Q2B, Q6A Q2A, Q2B, Q3BR, Q3C, Q6A 1 TS= Testing Specification, 2 Reg- Appl. = Registration Application, 3 Reg. Auth. = Regulatory Authorities 13

4 TS for Staility Testing of Drug Sustance, No. 3 Validation Report for TS No. 3 Staility Report Drug Sustance TS for Intermediates Drug sustance Validation Report for TS Intermediates Drug Sustance Staility Report Intermediates Rationale Specifications Drug Sustance - Selection Test Attriutes - Selection Analytical Procedures - Derivation of Acceptance Criteria TS for Release and Staility Testing Drug Product, Nr. 6 Validation Report for TS No. 6 Staility Report Drug Product TS for Intermediates Drug Product Validation Report for TS Intermediates Drug Product Staility Report Intermediates Staility Report Bulk Rationale Specifications Drug Product - Selection Test Attriutes - Selection Analytical Procedures - Derivation of Acceptance Criteria Rationale Dissolution 3.2.S.4.2, 3.2.S.7.1 3.2.S.4.2, 3.2.S.7.1 3.2.S.7.1, 7.2, 7.3 3.2.S.2.4 3.2.S.2.4 3.2.S.7.1, 7.2, 7.3 3.2.S.4.5 3.2.P.4.2, 3.2.P.8.2 3.2.P.4.2, 3.2.P.8.2 3.2.P.8.1, 8.2, 8.3 3.2.P.3.4 3.2.P.3.4 3.2.P.8.1, 8.3 3.2.P.8.1, 8.3 3.2.4.1 3.2.4.1 Q3AR, Q3C, Q6A Q2A, Q2B Q1AR2, Q1B, Q1E,Q1F Q3AR, Q3C, Q6A Q2A, Q2B Q1AR2, Q1F Q3AR, Q3C, Q6A Q3BR, Q3C, Q6A Q2A, Q2B Q1AR2, Q1B, Q1D, Q1E, Q1F Q3BR, Q3C, Q6A Q2A, Q2B Q1AR2, Q1F Q1AR2, Q1F Q3BR, Q3C, Q6A Q6A 5 Staility Report Drug Sustance Staility Report Drug Product 3.2.S.7.1, 7.2, 7.3 3.2.P.8.1, 8.2, 8.3 Q1AR2, Q1E, Q1F Q1AR2, Q1D,Q1E,Q1F 6 Staility Report Drug Sustance Staility Report Drug Product Staility Report Variations Drug Sustance Staility Report Variations Drug Product Reg.Auth 3 Reg.Auth. Reg.Auth. Reg.Auth. CPMP/QWP/576/96 CPMP/QWP/576/96 12

Summarised required capacity in the steps 1-5 Step of Develop- Stage of Development Required [weeks] Capacity [weeks x1.3]* Capacity [weeks] per step/ [weeks x 1.3]* total capacity [years = 42 weeks]** 1 Stress- and accelerated testing with drug sustance Preliminary staility profile 8 10 Staility profile 12 16 20 26 0.62 2 Preformulation and formulation finding 36 47 36 47 1.12 3 Stress- and accelerated testing clinical phase I 24 31 clinical phase II 24 31 clinical phase III 32 42 final formulation 18 23 cleaning validation 5 7 scaling-up 23 30 126 164 3.90 4 Accelerated and longterm-testing drug sustance 9 12 drug product 17 22 PAI preparation 6 8 32 42 1.00 5 On-going staility testing drug sustance 20 26 drug product 42 55 62 81 1.93 Total 1-4 214 279 6.64 Total 1-5 276 360 8.57 To calculate the actual time span the remaining work which is indirectly related with the NME s has to e considered, such as SOP s, qualifications, literature, therefore 0.75 % of a week is used corresponding to the factor of 1.3. **One year is calculated with 210 days =^ 42 weeks. 13

Staility testing on the critical path Step of development Statements/ Laelling Needed for Time to availaility from start 1 Preliminary staility profile of drug sustance Start of predevelopment 6 weeks Staility profile of drug sustance Base for minimum shelf life phase I 16 weeks 3 Minimum shelf life toxicological samples Release of toxicological samples 8 weeks Minimum shelf life clinical samples phase I Release of clinical trial atch phase I 9 or 15 weeks Minimum shelf life clinical samples phase II Release of clinical trial atch phase II 15 weeks or 27 weeks Minimum shelf life clinical samples phase III Release of clinical trial atch phase III 15 weeks or 27 weeks 4 Staility report for registration application Filing data for registration application (Release of 3rd atch for accelerated and long-term testing) 15 months 14