Conseil International de l Arbitrage en matière de Sport International Council of Arbitration for Sport

Similar documents
18 October 2013 Marquette University Law School

Is the Pechstein Saga Coming to an End? German Federal Court of Justice Ruling on Claudia Pechstein v International Skating Union, June 2016

Arbitration CAS anti-doping Division (OG Rio) AD 16/010 International Olympic Committee (IOC) v. Gabriel Sincraian, award of 8 December 2016

Arbitration CAS 2008/A/1571 Nusaybindemir SC v. Turkish Football Federation (TFF) & Sirnak SC, award of 15 December 2008

Arbitration CAS ad hoc Division (O.G. Sydney) 00/015 Mihaela Melinte / International Amateur Athletic Federation (IAAF), award of 29 September 2000

COURT OF ARBITRATION FOR SPORT (CAS) Anti-doping Division XXIII Olympic Winter Games in Pyeongchang

Tribunal Arbitral du Sport Court of Arbitration for Sport

From 30 January to 04 February. 26 January Lausanne - Switzerland EOC Executive Committee Meeting EOC

Story Headline: DECISION OF THE IOC EXECUTIVE BOARD CONCERNING THE PARTICIPATION OF RUSSIAN ATHLETES IN THE OLYMPIC GAMES RIO 2016

Arbitration CAS ad hoc Division (O.G. Salt Lake City) 02/003 Bassani-Antivari / International Olympic Committee (IOC), award of 12 February 2002

Story Headline: IOC President Thomas Bach says 5th Olympic Summit agreed on full review of WADA anti-doping system.

ANTI-DOPING BY-LAW OF THE AUSTRALIAN OLYMPIC COMMITTEE

Arbitration CAS anti-doping Division (OG Rio) AD 16/006 International Olympic Committee (IOC) v. Kleber Da Silva Ramos, award of 20 August 2016

Arbitration CAS 2008/A/1599 USA Badminton (USAB) & United States Olympic Committee (USOC) v. Badminton World Federation (BWF), award of 23 July 2008

Arbitration CAS ad hoc Division (OG Rio) 16/023 Ihab Abdelrahman v. Egyptian NADO, award of 16 August 2016 (operative part of 11 August 2016)

Panel: Mr Rui Botica Santos (Portugal), President; Mr Jehangir Baglari (Islamic Republic of Iran); Mr Raymond Hack (South Africa)

COURT OF ARBITRATION FOR SPORT (CAS) Anti-Doping Division Games of the XXXI Olympiad in Rio de Janeiro AWARD

Arbitration CAS 2009/A/2011 Stephan Schumacher v. International Olympic Committee (IOC), award on costs of 6 May 2010

Founding and Landmark Cases in the FIFA DRC

1.1 The Applicant is Ms. Karen Pavicic ( the Athlete ), an equestrian rider from Canada.

Australian Canoeing. Canoeing Competitions Bylaw. Adopted by the Board 31 October Bylaw #19

ISU Disciplinary Commission. Case No Decision of the ISU Disciplinary Commission. In the matter of. against.

Arbitration CAS anti-doping Division (OG Rio) AD 16/004 International Olympic Committee (IOC) v. Silvia Danekova, award of 12 August 2016

SINGAPORE WEIGHTLIFTING FEDERATION

Story Headline: IOC President on the participation of Russian athletes at the Olympic Games Rio Event: Interview with IOC President Thomas Bach.

COURT OF ARBITRATION FOR SPORT (CAS) Ad hoc Division Games of the XXXI Olympiad in Rio de Janeiro AWARD. Ihab Abdelrahman...

1.1 The Applicant in the case CAS OG 16/009 is the Russian Weightlifting Federation (hereinafter, the RWF ).

Panel: Prof. Michael Geistlinger (Austrian), President; Mr Henri Alvarez (Canada); Prof. Ulrich Haas (Germany)

Figure Skating. Figure skating: a long standing tradition in NOCs emerging from the break-up of the USSR

HOCKEY CANADA BY-LAWS DISPUTE RESOLUTION. 56. Appeals to Hockey Canada

Decision. the FIBA Secretary General in accordance with Article of the FIBA Internal Regulations governing Anti-Doping in the matter

BOOK 1 GENERAL REGULATION

A PROGRAMME FOR LEGAL SPECIALISTS WHO WANT TO UPDATE AND DEEPEN THEIR UNDERSTANDING OF FOOTBALL LAW

ISU Disciplinary Commission. Case No Decision of the ISU Disciplinary Commission. In the matter of. against.

Round 1 Quarter Finals Semi Finals Finals Winner [NED] NETHERLANDS [1] [NED] NETHERLANDS [1] [GBR] GREAT BRITAIN 5 [3] [KOR] KOREAN REPUBLIC [6]

Disciplinary Commission. Case No Final Decision in the matter of. against. and

Webster and Matuzalem How they affect CAS jurisprudence

Panel: The Hon. Annabelle Bennett (Australia), President; Justice Catherine Anne Davani (Papua New Guinea); Mrs Rabab Yasseen (Iraq)

IFCPF Strategic Plan

Panel: Mr Romano Subiotto QC (United Kingdom), President; Mr Quentin Byrne-Sutton (Switzerland); Mr Vit Horacek (Czech Republic)

FIVB TRIBUNAL REGULATIONS

The International Olympic Committee Anti-Doping Rules applicable to the XXI Olympic Winter Games in Vancouver, 2010

Disciplinary Commission. Case No Decision of the ISU Disciplinary Commission. In the matter of. against. and

SELECTION POLICIES NATIONAL SELECTION POLICY FOR DIVING 2018

IN THE MATTER OF PROCEEDINGS BROUGHT UNDER THE ICC ANTI-CORRUPTION CODE. Between: THE INTERNATIONAL CRICKET COUNCIL. and MR IRFAN AHMED DECISION

6. Officials should maintain a high level of personal hygiene and should maintain a professional appearance at all times.

Event: World Para Alpine Skiing Sport and Para Snowboard Sport Forum Participants Name Surname Initials

Arbitration CAS ad hoc Division (O.G. Nagano) 98/002 R. / International Olympic Committee (IOC), award of 12 February 1998

Panel: Mr Stuart McInnes (United Kingdom), President; Mr Allan Sullivan QC (Australia); Mr Sharad Rao (Kenya)

1.3 The purpose of this policy is to select the best eligible athletes for the Olympic Winter Games.

Selection Process for Great Britain Olympic Curling Team (Men s and Women s) 2018 Winter Olympic Games Pyeongchang, South Korea

IOC Evaluation Commission for the Games of the XXX Olympiad in 2012 Biographies*

Panel: The Hon. Annabelle Bennett (Australia), President; Mr José Juan Pinto (Spain); Mr Jinwon Park (South Korea)

REPORT TO THE GAISF GENERAL ASSEMBLY

AFL Coaches Code of Conduct

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Re: Objective Evaluation of prospective Olympic Athletes of Russia

DISCIPLINE - FOUL PLAY REGULATIONS

Chamber in Resolving Disputes between Players and Clubs

Panel: The Hon. Annabelle Bennett (Australia), President; Mr José Juan Pinto (Spain); Mr Jinwon Park (South Korea)

Guidelines for Nomination & Selection to 2018 Australian Youth Olympic Team Buenos Aires 6-18 October 2018

Panel: The Hon. Annabelle Bennett (Australia), Sole Arbitrator

Australian Olympic Committee. Athletes Commission CHARTER

Panel: Prof. Massimo Coccia (Italy), President; Mr. Peter Leaver QC (England); Mr. Olli Rauste (Finland)

INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC COMMITTEE INTERNATIONAL SPORTS FEDERATIONS REQUESTING IOC RECOGNITION. Recognition Procedure

5th Asian Indoor & Martial Arts Games Dance Sport Technical Factsheet

COURT OF ARBITRATION FOR SPORT (CAS) Ad Hoc Division XXIII Olympic Winter Games in Pyeongchang AWARD. ... ("Applicant")

Tribunal Arbitral du Sport Court of Arbitration for Sport

IOC Regulations on Female Hyperandrogenism

2006 AUSTRALIAN WINTER OLYMPIC TEAM SKI & SNOWBOARD AUSTRALIA LIMITED NOMINATION CRITERIA ALPINE SKIING

UWW ANTI-DOPING PANEL DECISION. Case

2018 IOC EVALUATION COMMISSION MEMBERS BIOGRAPHIES. Ms Gunilla LINDBERG - Commission Chair (SWE)

XX1 Commonwealth Games Gold Coast, Australia April Selection Policy and Standards October 2016

OLYMPIC ATHLETE FROM RUSSIA IMPLEMENTATION GROUP REPORT

INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC COMMITTEE IOC DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION DECISION REGARDING ADAM SEROCZYNSKI BORN ON 13 MARCH 1974, ATHLETE, POLAND, CANOE

Men s Artistic Gymnastics 2019 Junior World Championships Selection Process

UEFA ANTI-DOPING PROGRAMME. Doping control data information for players

Olympic Weightlifting New Zealand s Selection Policy for Senior, Junior & Youth 2019 International Weightlifting Events

The Dispute Resolution System within the framework of FIFA

Arbitration CAS 98/218 H. / Fédération Internationale de Natation (FINA), award of 27 May 1999

Disciplinary Commission. Case No Decision of the ISU Disciplinary Commission. In the matter of. against

FINA CONSTITUTION. Approved by the FINA Congress on 23 July 2015 LEGAL STATUS AND HEADQUARTERS DEFINITIONS DISCRIMINATION OBJECTIVES MEMBERSHIP

Panel: Mr. Michael Beloff QC (England), President; Mrs. Maidie Oliveau (USA); Mr. Dirk-Reiner Martens (Germany) LAW

Anti-Doping Rules applicable to the Olympic Winter Games PyeongChang 2018 (as of August 2017) 1

37/ Promoting human rights through sport and the Olympic ideal

UIPM Rules on Internal Organisation

I N T E R N A T I O N A L S K A T I N G U N I O N

Measuring and predicting success. Simon Shibli

THE FIGHT AGAINST DOPING AND PROMOTION OF ATHLETES HEALTH UPDATE - MARCH 2008

WORLD TAEKWONDO FEDERATION STANDING PROCEDURES FOR TAEKWONDO COMPETITION AT OLYMPIC GAMES

Arbitration CAS 2006/A/1190 World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) v. Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) & Shoaib Akhtar & Muhammed Asif, award of 28 June 2006

Introduction. The Back Story. Participating Countries. Sports. The Brand and Mascot

2014 AUSTRALIAN OLYMPIC WINTER TEAM Ski & Snowboard Australia NOMINATION CRITERIA FREESTYLE SKIING: SKI CROSS

2018 AUSTRALIAN OLYMPIC WINTER TEAM. Ski & Snowboard Australia NOMINATION CRITERIA ALPINE SKIING

I N T E R N A T I O N A L S K A T I N G U N I O N

OVERALL STANDING WORLD ROWING CUP 2013

Disciplinary Commission. Final Decision in the matter of. International Skating Union, - Complainant. against. and

President s Report to the 2016 Plenary Meeting of the IPC

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING. between THE UNION OF EUROPEAN FOOTBALL ASSOCIATIONS. (hereinafter referred to as UEFA ) and

XXI Commonwealth Games. Gold Coast, Australia April Selection Policy and Standards December 2016

Transcription:

Le Président The President REPORT OF THE INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL OF ARBITRATION FOR SPORT TO THE ASSOCIATION OF NATIONAL OLYMPIC COMMITTEES 2 NOVEMBER 2017, PRAGUE, CZECH REPUBLIC 1. CAS activities Between 1 January and 30 September 2017, 421 procedures were registered with the CAS. These are broken down as follows: 82 ordinary procedures 328 appeal procedures 11 mediation procedures It is likely that the final figure for the year will be around 550. This will be less than the record 609 procedures in 2016, remembering that 41 of them comprised cases heard by the Anti-Doping and ad hoc Divisions at the Rio Games. Pleasingly, there will be a new record in the number of mediations. 2. Applications for legal aid Between 1 January and 31 September 2017, the ICAS Board has considered 38 applications for legal aid, granting 16 and partially granting assistance in 13. 3. Challenges to CAS s Between 1 January and 31 September 2017, the ICAS Board has considered 4 challenges to arbitrators, of which none were successful.

4. Swiss Federal Tribunal (SFT) and other Tribunals In 2017, to date, there have been 24 appeals against CAS awards filed with the SFT, of which 8 have been dismissed, 1 withdrawn and 15 are pending. In total, since the creation of CAS, 181 appeals have been filed at the SFT; 9 of them have been upheld; and, 2 partially upheld (5.5%). The Cour de Cassation, France s highest court, recently ruled that the arbitration clause in favour of CAS in the International Ski Federation (FIS) athletes declaration was valid and must be respected by the state courts in France. This follows Germany s highest court having ruled in favour of CAS jurisdiction in the Pechstein case, repeated recognition by the highest courts in Switzerland and recognition in the United States and Australia. 5. Seminars and Representation activities 2017 17 May: Internal seminar in Denver USA for CAS s based in North America, co-organised with the U.S. Sports Lawyers Association (SLA); 19 May: Public CAS session organised by the SLA and CAS, SLA Annual Conference in Denver, USA; 9 June: Presentation of the CAS Procedures and Jurisprudence at the Council of Europe in Strasbourg, France (M Reeb, W Sternheimer); 6 July: Meeting at the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) of ICAS delegation (J Coates, T Andrée- Prosenc, W Thomassen, C Malinvaud and M Reeb) with ECHR President, G Raimondi, 2 Vice Presidents, 3 Section Presidents and others; 18 July: Presentation of the CAS Procedures and Jurisprudence at the Arbitration Academy in Paris, France (W Sternheimer); 7 September: Participation at the Edinburgh Sports Conference, UK (A de Quesada); 12 September: Public Workshop in Lima, Peru organised by the Lima Chamber of Commerce and CAS; 15 September: Report to the IOC Session, Lima, Peru (J Coates); 19 September: Participation at the Conference on Minors in Football, organised by the International Association of Football Lawyers (AIAF) in Kiev, Ukraine (P Pellaux); 20 September: Report to the Olympic Council of Asia General Assembly, Ashgabat, Turkmenistan (J Coates); 22 October: Keynote speech on the duties of the arbitrators at the inauguration of the Arbitration Centre of Saudi Arabia in Riyadh (M Reeb); 28 October: Presentation of the CAS latest developments at the Nordic Conference on Sports Law in Helsinki, Finland (M Reeb).

2018 18 April: Conference LawAccord, Bangkok, Thailand in collaboration with LawAccord; 16 May: Internal seminar in National Harbour, USA for CAS s based in North America (open to all CAS members) co-organised with the SLA; 18 May: Public CAS session co-organised with the SLA and included in the official program of the SLA Annual Conference, National Harbour, USA; 21-22 September: Public seminar in Lausanne, Switzerland organised jointly by CAS, the Swiss Bar Association and the Swiss Arbitration Association; 6. CAS ad hoc Divisions In 2017, CAS ad hoc Divisions were established on the occasion of the Asian Winter Games in Sapporo, Japan and Asian Indoor and Martial Arts Games in Ashgabat, Turkmenistan. In 2018, 4 CAS ad hoc Divisions will be established for the: - Olympic Winter Games in PyeongChang, Korea, 9-25 February; - Commonwealth Games, Gold Coast, Australia, 4-15 April comprising 1 President (working at a distance), 1 (present on Gold Coast), 3-4 s (on standby), Secretary General, 1 Counsel, 1 Administrative Assistant; - FIFA World Cup in Russia June-July (remotely) comprising a group of around 25 s (on standby); and - Asian Games in Jakarta, Indonesia, 18 August-2 September comprising 1 President, Secretary General, 6 s, 1 Counsel, 1 Administrative Assistant. For the Olympic Winter Games in PyeongChang in 2018, the Divisions will comprise: CAS ad hoc Division Michael Lenard, USA President Corinne Schmidhauser, SUI Co-President Mohamed Abdul Raouf, EGY Laurence Boisson de Chazournes, FRA John Faylor, USA/GER Thi My Dung Nguyen, VIE Jinwon Park, KOR Carol Roberts, CAN Martin Schimke, GER Zali Steggall, AUS Bernard Welten, SUI

CAS Anti-Doping Division Ivo Eusebio, SUI President Tjasa Andrée-Prosenc, SLO Co-President Jens Evald, DEN Ken Lalo, ISR Markus Manninen, FIN Cameron Myler, USA Janie Soublière, CAN Mark Williams, AUS Both Divisions will operate from 30 January-25 February 2018. The CAS offices will be located in Yong Pyong, the venue for some alpine skiing events. The office will be open every day from 08:30 to 18:00 and until 19:30 during Games time. The procedural rules for the CAS ADD will be available on the CAS website. The rules for the CAS ad hoc Division are contained in the CAS Code, also on the CAS website. A selection of pro bono lawyers will be available for athletes. The Olympic Games in Rio was the first time in the history of the Olympic Games that the CAS had jurisdiction in first instance doping-related matters arising on the occasion of the Games which were previously determined by IOC Disciplinary Commissions appointed by the IOC President. The new independent structure handled 13 doping cases in accordance with the IOC Anti-Doping Rules. For PyeongChang 2018 the CAS ADD will also include participation of the International Federations concerned, all 7 having delegated jurisdiction to impose potential sanctions applicable at the Games (disqualification, exclusion) and outside the Games time (suspension). Such unified procedure will be conducted by the same panel of arbitrators. An appeal will remain possible to the CAS ad hoc Division at the Games, and following the Games to the CAS Appeal Division, Lausanne, in both cases involving different arbitrators. For the Tokyo 2020 Olympic Games, we are anticipating that all of the International Federations concerned will be invited to delegate jurisdiction for consequential sanctions to the CAS ADD in the same way. 7. ICAS Board and ICAS meetings The ICAS Board met on 11 May and the ICAS on 12 May in Lausanne, Switzerland. The ICAS Board also met last week on 25 October and the ICAS on 26 October 2017. The ICAS is most grateful to the NOC of Oman and its President and IOC Member, H.E. Sheikh Khalid Bin Mohammed Al Zubair for hosting these meetings. We also acknowledge and thank ANOC and OCA President, H.E. Sheikh Ahmad Al-Fahad Al-Sabah for his attendance at the receptions and other formal occasions around these meetings in Oman. Among the agenda items for the ICAS Meeting in Oman was consideration of the creation of a permanent anti-doping division of CAS and the appointment of a group of CAS arbitrators who are specialists in antidoping related matters.

Similar to the operation of the new Independent Testing Authority outside of Games time, the recognition of the jurisdiction and utilisation of the services of the permanent CAS Anti-Doping Division by International Federations would be made on a voluntary basis (with the exception of the CAS ADD jurisdiction during the Olympic Games). Consideration is being given and researched as to whether a single arbitrator would be available in the first instance, with the usual right of appeal under the World Anti-Doping Code (WAD Code) being free of arbitrator and court costs, to the CAS Appeal Division or whether a panel of 3 arbitrators could hear alleged ADRVs possibly on a first and final instance or at first instance with judicial review only (not a de novo hearing) by the CAS Appeal Division and given that in both cases limited appeal rights to the SFT (fair hearing, etc) will be available. The permanent CAS ADD will be available to hear alleged ADRVs involving international level athletes free of arbitrator and court costs. It would also be available to national anti-doping organisations and national federations to hear alleged ADRVs involving national level athletes, as is currently the case under the WAD Code, but on a user-pay basis and given that in many countries (e.g. UK, Canada, New Zealand, Malaysia and Oman) there exist national tribunals which provide this service. The ICAS acknowledges that for International Federations to cede jurisdiction in this way, the procedure will have to be free of arbitrator and court costs for them and assured of expeditious resolution. And for the athletes, the existing access to pro bono lawyers and legal aid provided by CAS must and will continue to be available. I will chair a working party with ICAS members, Richard Pound QC and Swiss Judge Ivo Eusebio, Secretary General Matthieu Reeb and CAS Counsel Brent Nowicki to progress this work on behalf of the wider ICAS who, of course, must finally approve and adopt. These are complex legal considerations and the creation and commencement of such a permanent CAS Anti-Doping Division is unlikely before 1 January 2019 or even 2020. John Coates AC 1 November 2017 President