Policy. The Calico Group. Calico Homes. Calico Enterprise. SafeNet. Acorn Recovery Projects. Whitworth Care Trust

Similar documents
Gas Safety Management Policy

Strategic Director for Environment. Enclosures Appendix A - Option drawings. Jamie Blake- Strategic Director for Environment

High 2010 Medium 2010/11. PCT NHS Darlington Primary Care Trust HPC DBC DBC. High HPC. Med to High

THE PLANNING AND. Transport and the law Integrated transport planning Strategies Responsibilities of local government and road controlling authorities

Cycle traffic and the Strategic Road Network. Sandra Brown, Team Leader, Safer Roads- Design

SINGLE LONG TERM MOORING AGAINST PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL LAND

Local Highway Panels Members Guide. 9 Public Rights of Way

A guide to how local communities can change local speed limits

Seal Extension Guidelines. Asset Management and Systems

Speed Limit Policy Isle of Wight Council

HUNTER WATER CORPORATION. Hunter Water Rainwater Tank Study. Terms and Conditions

QLDC Council 29 October Report for Agenda Item: 3

Milton Road Project Update. Paul van de Bulk 30 January 2018

6. BREENS/GARDINERS/HAREWOOD INTERSECTION - SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

COUNCIL POLICY. Document No: CPL260.5 Approval Date: 23 March 2010 Obstruction

COUNTY SPORTS PARTNERSHIP (CSP) CORE SPECIFICATION INTERPRETATION GUIDE

Highland Park Glengarry Court. Landscape design and Fencing rules

Gas and Carbon Monoxide Safety

Much Wenlock Neighbourhood Plan Land and Premises Availability Assessment

Determination 2018/047 Regarding the code compliance of barriers to a pool at 32 St Andrews Drive, Hikuai

Process for managing parking on verges, footways and footpaths

WORKING WITH COMMUNITIES AND INTEREST GROUPS

Wanaka Community Board 16 November Report for Agenda Item: 1. Temporary Road Closure - Challenge Wanaka Triathlon Event 2017

Rights of Way Enforcement Procedure for Land Managers

The Corporation of the City of Sarnia. School Crossing Guard Warrant Policy

Club Roles and Responsibilities Version 2.1 July 2017

Report to Cabinet. 18 May 2016

Regarding the code-compliance of sliding doors that form part of a barrier to a pool at 148 Glenbrook Road, Pukekohe

CITY OF TORONTO. BY-LAW No

Policy. Stormwater Fencing. 1. Overview Objective Scope Summary

MINE SAFETY TARGETED ASSESSMENT PROGRAM. Ground or strata failure NSW metalliferous mines. April

Safer Verges and the Strategic Road Network

TRAFF IC CALMING POLICY

Report to COUNCIL for decision

SEASONAL POOLS REVIEW AND STRATEGY

connectivity through walking and cycling

TO: FROM: SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION REPORT SUMMARY BOARD AUTHORITY

Ormond & McKinnon Walks Response to Draft Glen Eira Community Plan

Health and Safety Inspection Procedure

July 2016 JD No 6 Post No 6 JOB DESCRIPTION

land transport road assets

Aiming for Zero Road Worker Safety. Mark Pooley Highways Agency Road Worker Safety Programme Manager Monday 11 June 2012

QLDC Council 24 July Report for Agenda Item: Fergburger Proposed Shotover Street Footpath Upgrade

DESIGN CODE. Enterprise West Harlow London Road North Design Code 21

Fencing swimming and spa pools

CITY OF TORONTO. BY-LAW No

City of Turlock Traffic Calming Program

Neighbourhood Development Plan for Ickford Parish Council October 2015

NAVIGATIONAL SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MANUAL

Road Safety Action Plan

A1307 Haverhill to Cambridge: Approval to consult on transport improvement concepts

What do Passenger Transport Services do?

// RoWSaF Making roads safer for road workers rowsaf.org.uk. RoWSaF Strategy 2015

DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION Water Forum Terms of reference: September 2016

MILTON ROAD LLF PROJECT UPDATE

land transport road assets

Swimming pool fence at 33 Melchizedek Place, Dairy Flat, Auckland

Section 2 Strategic Alignment. Contents

LEVEL 2 CERTIFICATE OF COMPETENCE IN CHAINSAW AND RELATED OPERATIONS ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE

LTP and ROWIP Integration

University of Leeds Travel Plan

Frequently asked questions (FAQ) about a borough-wide 20 mph speed limit

School Traffic Management Plan

Restricting Access to Your Swimming / Small Heated Pool Information / Checklist

additional and sustainable

LIFT MAINTENANCE POLICY

IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINE NO. 13

HS26 Working at Height Policy and Procedure

Environmental Services Buller District Council 4-6 Brougham Street PO Box 21, Westport 7866 Telephone

Additional Policies & Objectives for Local Area Plans Ashbourne LAP. Ashbourne

The Yalgoo Experience. Ryan Gibson

Developing a Birmingham Transport Space Allocation policy. David Harris Transport Policy Manager Economy Directorate Birmingham City Council

E PGN-11. Part of NTW (O)32 Estates Operations and Maintenance Policy Paul McCabe Head of Estates and Facilities-NTW Solution Ltd

5 DECEMBER Cycling In London. Andrew Summers, Transport for London Strategy and Policy Manager Active Travel and Health.

SFHGEN77 - SQA Code HD48 04 Perform first line calibration on clinical equipment to ensure it is fit for use

WEST HATCH HIGH SCHOOL THE BEST THAT I CAN BE. School Travel Plan

Planning for tennis in your Local Government Area. A resource from Tennis Australia

Township of Springwater

YORKSHIRE WATER PROTECTION OF MAINS AND SERVICES

Rural Economy and Connectivity Committee. Restricted Roads (20mph Speed Limit) (Scotland) Bill: Key Themes Arising from the Online Survey

POOL FENCING A Guide to the Fencing of Swimming Pools Act 1987

TRANSPORT PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES THAT SUPPORT COMMUNITIES. Provide access to, from and for emergency services

Active Transportation Infrastructure Investment A Business Case

Smithers Golf and Country Club

Global EHS Powered Industrial Truck and Pedestrian Safety

The Berwick-upon-Tweed Conservation Areas Advisory Group (CAAG)

Delivering the. Strategy 7.0

WELCOME Public Information Centre

2018 FIFA World Cup Stakeholder Engagement First Phase: Verifying the sustainability strategy

PRO Lifting Operations

Strategic Plan for Sevens Rugby. September 2006

British Road Safety: Presentation 28/10/2009 by Duncan Price, Deputy Head, Road User Safety Division

YORKSHIRE WATER PROTECTION OF MAINS AND SERVICES

Site Traffic Management Plan

WAIROA DISTRICT COUNCIL P

Bikeability Grants Grant Application Guidance. Moving Britain Ahead

Appendix 12 Parking on footways and verges

Cycle Lanes Dixon Street (Worksop Road to Crayne Street)

Orkney Rugby Football Club

Road Safety Strategy of Nepal for Resilient and Sustainable Development

Transcription:

Policy Title: Fencing Policy Author: Beth Gallagher Approved by: Board Date of First Issue: May 2011 Last full review date: February 2014 Updated: January 2016 Date of next review: February 2017 This document relates to: The Calico Group Calico Homes Calico Enterprise SafeNet Acorn Recovery Projects Whitworth Care Trust

CONTENTS PAGE Page No 1.0 Introduction 3 2.0 Aims / Objectives of the policy 3 3.0 Policy Description 3 4.0 Scope 6 5.0 Responsibility 7 6.0 Service Standards 7 7.0 Regulatory and legal compliance 8 8.0 Monitoring 8 9.0 Consultation 8 10.0 Benchmarking 9 11.0 Related Strategies, Policies and Procedures 9 2

1.0 Introduction When this policy was first introduced in May 2011 we received regular feedback from our customers stating that fencing and /or the provision of defensible space was one of their main priorities. There was an expectation that Calico should provide and maintain fencing. The STAR survey which was undertaken in 2012 indicates that the provision of fencing is no longer a main priority for customers. Customer consultation completed in 2014 shows that internal and external property repairs are the main priority. This policy outlines Calico s approach to providing fencing to the front of our customers homes, the provision of defensible space to rear of their homes and general day to day repairs. 2.0 Aims and Objectives The aim of this policy is to provide guidance to all staff and customers about our approach to boundary and dividing fencing, both to the front and rear of our customers homes. It covers the planned fencing programme, how we deal with day to day repairs and requests in relation to all other boundaries which include walls, hedges and rear fencing. 3.0 Policy Description Planned works Front Fencing Calico is in the process of replacing the existing wooden fencing, to the front of properties across its housing stock, with new metal fencing where required. The programme has ensured that our customers homes are provided with secure and safe boundary fences to the front of their property. All works have been carried out in consultation with customers. Customers do have the option to refuse works. 3

The scope of works has been determined by individual property inspections and includes fencing and gates to the front of properties where there is currently wooden fencing which is in poor condition. We have not replaced any hedges, walls or existing metal fencing that is already in situ. Areas that have always been open plan will remain without fencing. Double access gates/parking provision Double access gates will only be provided as part of planned works where there is an authorised dropped kerb, a pavement crossing is present and the existing driveway is: A minimum width of 2.5 metres A minimum depth of 6.5 metres from the front of the property to the front boundary Where a true driveway is present then a double access gate will be provided instead of a single pedestrian gate. In line with Highways law the gates will open inwards onto the drive. Dividing Fences and Adjoining owners Dividing fencing is the responsibility of the customer. We do not carry out repairs to dividing fences to the front or rear of the property. However, if a dividing fence is shared with an owner occupier, repairs may be completed if the owner occupier can provide certified, documentary evidence that the fencing is Calico s responsibility. Where there is a Health and Safety concern, the fence may be removed with the owners consent. If the owner occupier refuses to give consent then the existing fence has to remain in situ. 4

Day to day repairs Rear Boundary Fencing Calico has no statutory responsibility to provide rear or dividing fencing. We will only consider replacing/repairing fencing where it is needed to provide: - Protection and/or privacy from people or vehicles entering a garden where it borders a busy thoroughfare or public space. - Separation of a garden from hazards such as streams or severe changes in ground level at the edge of a property. We will use the protection and privacy test noted above to decide whether existing fencing will be repaired or replaced. The decision to repair or replace fencing is at the discretion of Calico. Any other repairs where there are no privacy or protection issues remain the responsibility of the customer; Calico will remove the fencing on your behalf if required, but will not replace it. Any fencing requested received due to anti social behavior concerns regarding children and/or animals will also only be considered based on the above criteria. Where a customer is identified as having a vulnerability issue, any request for fencing will be assessed in line with their specific needs to ensure that they are not unfairly disadvantaged by the protection and privacy tests. Where a decision is made to repair or replace fencing, the style of fencing will be based on which offers best value for money. Front, Rear and Side Gates Repairs to gates including hinges and latches are the responsibility of the customer. 5

Other Boundaries Hedges Properties where hedges provide the defensible space to properties are the responsibility of the customer to maintain and keep in order. Calico does not remove established hedging to replace this with metal or wooden fencing. Calico can offer customers advice and guidance on obtaining assistance to maintain their hedges where required. Walls Walls that provide the defensible space to properties remain the responsibility of Calico to maintain. Metal or wooden fencing will not be installed where walls are present. Open Spaces Areas that are currently open plan i.e. where there is no obvious individual garden areas, or where fencing has never been in place will remain open plan. This information will be communicated to customers taking up tenancies on properties in these areas prior to sign up so that they are aware of the company s policy. 4.0 Scope This policy outlines our approach to the planned programme of fencing replacement and how we will deal with requests for day to day repairs and other boundary issues including walls, front and rear fencing and hedges. 6

5.0 Responsibility The overall responsibility for this policy lies with the Property Services Manager but various aspects of the operational delivery of it lies with various departments across the organisation who will work together to identify the most appropriate solution. The Property Services Manager is responsible for the delivery of the planned programme for fencing across our stock. The Repairs Operations Manager is responsible for the allocation of rear fencing based on the protection and privacy tests outlined. 6.0 Service Standards Planned works Customers will be consulted with regards to planned works prior to works commencing. Customer satisfaction will be monitored on completion of works, increase in STAR survey results relating to Overall Quality of Home. Regular meetings will be completed with contractors to assess progress. Day to day repairs The decision to carry out repairs to rear fencing will be based on the protection and privacy tests outlined. Customers will be informed at the initial point of contact as to whether a request for fencing will be considered. Customers will be advised of the final outcome in writing within 14 days of their request. 7

Fencing repairs will be completed within 6 months of works being approved. Any repairs relating to a significant and immediate health and safety risk will be prioritised. 7.0 Regulatory and Legal Compliance There is currently no regulatory or legal compliance relating to the provision of fencing by registered providers. 8.0 Monitoring Successful completion of planned fencing programme on time, within agreed budgets and in consultation with customers. Reduced number of complaints received regarding fencing. Improvement in STAR survey results relating to Overall Quality of Home (86% as at end of 2012) Completion of day to day repairs within the agreed 6 month timescale. Year on year reduction in day to day fencing repairs budget. 9.0 Consultation This policy came about following consultation with customers on their main priorities for each estate as part of neighbourhood road shows during the summer of 2010. Fencing and external improvements were identified as a top 3 priority in 6 out of our 15 neighbourhoods. Since this time the STAR survey has been completed and fencing was not identified as a neighbourhood priority for customers. A fencing survey was completed with customers in April 2014. Although important, fencing was not given as high a priority as internal and external repairs/improvements to properties. The investment and repairs team steering groups and tenant board members have been consulted and provided feedback on the review of the policy. 8

A survey of customers has been undertaken to identify their priorities and this feedback has been used in the review of the policy. Customer contact information has also been used in the review. 10.0 Benchmarking This policy has been bench marked with a number of other registered providers: Mole Valley Housing Association Golden Gates Housing Trust Nottingham City Homes Bracknell Forest Homes Bolsover Council South Liverpool Housing Salix Homes One Vision Housing Phoenix 11.0 Related Strategies, Policies and Procedures Asset Management Strategy Repairs Policy Value for Money Strategy Customer Contacts Investment Programme Procedure Successful Neighbourhoods Strategy Rechargeable Repairs Anti-social Behavior Policy (ASB) 9