SoundCast Design Intro

Similar documents
SOUNDCAST CALIBRATION AND SENSITIVITY TEST RESULTS (DRAFT) TABLE OF CONTENTS. Puget Sound Regional Council. Suzanne Childress.

DaySim Standard Technical Documentation

Measuring the Distribution and Costs of Congestion. Tim Lomax Texas Transportation Institute

Transportation Trends, Conditions and Issues. Regional Transportation Plan 2030

1999 On-Board Sacramento Regional Transit District Survey

5858 N COLLEGE, LLC N College Avenue Traffic Impact Study

Understanding Transit Demand. E. Beimborn, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

Online Open House Survey Report. December 2016

Highway 217 Corridor Study. Phase I Overview Report

Appendix B: Forecasting and Traffic Operations Analysis Framework Document

Sketch Level Assessment. of Traffic Issues. for the Fluor Daniel I-495 HOT Lane Proposal. Ronald F. Kirby

Understanding Rail and Bus Ridership

TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY

EFFICIENCY OF TRIPLE LEFT-TURN LANES AT SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS

Sixth Line Development - Transit Facilities Plan

El Paso County 2040 Major Transportation Corridors Plan

Preliminary Transportation Analysis

South Florida Commuter Travel Survey Summary and Preliminary Results. Southeast Florida FSUTMS User Group Meeting June 1, 2012

ISSUE 1. Geography challenge. Geography funnels traffic from several key corridors onto I-5.

Measuring Transportation: Traffic, Mobility and Accessibility

Appendices. Atkins SBL Forecasting Report 54

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... vii 1 STUDY OVERVIEW Study Scope Study Area Study Objectives

Typical Rush Hour Commute. PennyforTransportation.com

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Ave

Central Jersey Transportation Forum. March 2007

Employment 8,881 17,975 9,094. Households 18,990 31,936 12,946

Pedestrian Demand Modeling: Evaluating Pedestrian Risk Exposures

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis

Corridor Advisory Group and Task Force Meeting #10. July 27, 2011

Governor s Transportation Vision Panel

Capital Beltway HOT Lanes - Frequently Asked Questions

2010 Pedestrian and Bicyclist Special Districts Study Update

Statewide Ridership Analysis Report. Statewide Analysis Model Version 2.5 (SAM-V2.5)

Transportation Modeling for the 2010 Winter Olympic Games

South King County High-Capacity Transit Corridor Study

Pedestrian Activity Criteria. PSAC March 8, 2011

Tulsa Metropolitan Area LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

LOOP 360 IMPROVEMENT STUDY

Tokyo: Simulating Hyperpath-Based Vehicle Navigations and its Impact on Travel Time Reliability

REGIONAL HOUSEHOLD TRAVEL SURVEY:

Simulating Street-Running LRT Terminus Station Options in Dense Urban Environments Shaumik Pal, Rajat Parashar and Michael Meyer

Determining bicycle infrastructure preferences A case study of Dublin

Goodlettsville Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Executive Summary

Connecting Sacramento: A Trip-Making and Accessibility Study

Travel Patterns and Characteristics

Appendix F: Detailed Modeling Results

ADOT Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Phase IV Activities APPENDIX B PEDESTRIAN DEMAND INDEX

WELCOME TO OPEN HOUSE # 1 June 14, 2017

Newberg-Dundee Transportation Improvement Project. Appendix D: Traffic and Revenue Forecasts SENSITIVE BUSINESS RECORD

Performance Criteria for 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan

STUDY ADVISORY COMMITTEE. October 8, 2015

Eliminate on-street parking where it will allow for a dedicated bus only lane %

CITY OF ABBOTSFORD TRANSPORTATION AND TRANSIT MASTER PLAN

Transportation, Parking & Roads

Figure 1: East West Connector Alignment Alternatives Concept Drawing

DON MILLS-EGLINTON Mobility Hub Profile

Urban planners have invested a lot of energy in the idea of transit-oriented

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study

Guidelines for Providing Access to Public Transportation Stations APPENDIX C TRANSIT STATION ACCESS PLANNING TOOL INSTRUCTIONS

Magnolia Place. Traffic Impact Analysis. Prepared for: City of San Mateo. Prepared by: Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Travel Characteristics on Weekends:

NEWMARKET CENTRE Mobility Hub Profile

APPENDIX E BIKEWAY PRIORITIZATION METHODOLOGY

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Executive Summary

Modal Shift in the Boulder Valley 1990 to 2009

Chapter 14 PARLIER RELATIONSHIP TO CITY PLANS AND POLICIES. Recommendations to Improve Pedestrian Safety in the City of Parlier (2014)

GEARY BRT SIMULATION VISSIM Calibration and Existing Conditions Results

Briefing Paper #1. An Overview of Regional Demand and Mode Share

Measuring and Communicating Mobility:

Evaluating chaff fire pattern algorithms in a simulation environment. JP du Plessis Institute for Maritime Technology South Africa

BETHEL ROAD AND SEDGWICK ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY

Public Consultation Centre

Building Community Partnerships for Mobility:

Rail Station Fact Sheet CentrePort/DFW Airport Station

CHAPTER 4 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS

TRANSPORTATION & MOBILITY

David DiPierro, John Amberson. Steering Committee Meeting #4 Overview

Chapter 5 Future Transportation

Estimating a Toronto Pedestrian Route Choice Model using Smartphone GPS Data. Gregory Lue

SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 UPDATE HISTORY

Memorandum. Drive alone

Gdynia s bicycle model

Highway 111 Corridor Study

Roundabouts along Rural Arterials in South Africa

Bike Share Social Equity and Inclusion Target Neighborhoods

Operationalizing Accessibility

Bike Planner Overview

City of Novi Non-Motorized Master Plan 2011 Executive Summary

Mobility and Congestion

Tampa Bay Regional Planning Model (TBRPM v7.x)

Defining Purpose and Need

Maryland State Highway Mobility Report. Morteza Tadayon

Congestion Reducing Activities. Toby Carr GDOT Director of Planning April 10, 2014

A CHOICE MODEL ON TRIP MODE CHAIN FOR INTER-ISLANDS COMMUTERS IN MOLUCCA-INDONESIA: A CASE STUDY OF THE TERNATE ISLAND HALMAHERA ISLAND TRIP

Active Travel and Exposure to Air Pollution: Implications for Transportation and Land Use Planning

2014 Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Study Evaluation Tools Leslie A. Meehan, AICP MPO Technical Coordinating Committee Meeting April 1, 2015

DON MILLS-SHEPPARD Mobility Hub Profile

City of Davenport CitiBus Public Transportation Study. April 2015

Investigating Commute Mode and Route Choice Variability in Jakarta using multi-day GPS Data

ENHANCED PARKWAY STUDY: PHASE 2 CONTINUOUS FLOW INTERSECTIONS. Final Report

Transcription:

SoundCast Design Intro

Basic Design

SoundCast and Daysim 3 Land use attributes Households & Individuals SoundCast DaySim Travel demand simulator Trips and Households, Excel Summary Sheets, EMME network measures, Benefit Cost Outputs Trips Network assignment Traffic conditions Predictions

SoundCast creates a list of households and trips that looks like our household survey for the entire region! 4

Model Steps Population Synthesizer Who is traveling? Day Pattern How much do people travel? Destination Choice Where do people go? Mode Choice What mode do people use? Choice Models Time Choice What time do people travel at? 5 Route Assignment What paths do trips use?

Model Steps Compared to 4K About People Population Synthesizer Who is traveling? Day Pattern How much do people travel? Destination Choice Where do people go? Mode Choice What mode do people use? Time Choice What time do people travel at? Trip Generation How many trips are there? Trip Distribution Where do the trips go? Mode Choice What mode do the trips use? Time Choice What time do trips occur? 6 Route Assignment What paths do trips use? Route Assignment What paths do trips use?

How does it work? Population Synthesizer Who is traveling? Day Pattern How much do people travel? Destination Choice Where do people go? Mode Choice What mode do people use? Time Choice What time do people travel at? 7 Route Assignment What paths do trips use?

Geography: Parcels Activity Units: Sim People 8

Population Synthesizer: who is traveling? Example Household: Adult 29 years Full Time worker Male Child 3 years Pre-school student Male Household Income - $32,000 9

They live at one of these parcels. H 10

How does it work? Population Synthesizer Who is traveling? Day Pattern How much do people travel? Destination Choice Where do people go? Mode Choice What mode do people use? Time Choice What time do people travel at? 11 Route Assignment What paths do trips use?

How much do people travel?: Day Pattern Adult 1. Drops child off at school 2. Goes to work 3. Picks child up 4. Goes home 12 Child 1. Goes to school 2. Goes home

How does it work? work? Population Synthesizer Who is traveling? Day Pattern How much do people travel? Destination Choice Where do people go? Mode Choice What mode do people use? Time Choice What time do people travel at? 13 Route Assignment What paths do trips use?

Destination Choice at a parcel level W S H Adult 1. Drops child off at school parcel 2. Goes to work parcel 3. Picks Child up at school parcel 4. Goes to Parcel Home Child 1. Goes to school 2. Goes to home parcel Home 14

How does it work? Population Synthesizer Who is traveling? Day Pattern How much do people travel? Destination Choice Where do people go? Mode Choice What mode do people use? Time Choice What time do people travel at? 15 Route Assignment What paths do trips use?

16 What do mode do people use on their trips? Adult s Trips Drop off Child Go to Work Pick up Child Go home Most Likely Maybe? Probably Not!

How does it work? Population Synthesizer Who is traveling? Day Pattern How much do people travel? Destination Choice Where do people go? Mode Choice What mode do people use? Time Choice What time do people travel at? 17 Route Assignment What paths do trips use?

Time Choice: When do people travel? 3 AM 7 AM 12 PM 5 PM 10 PM 3 AM WORK SCHOOL Adult Child 18

How does it work? Population Synthesizer Who is traveling? Day Pattern How much do people travel? Destination Choice Where do people go? Mode Choice What mode do people use? Time Choice What time do people travel at? 19 Route Assignment What paths do trips use?

Route Assignment: What does it do? Places cars, trucks and buses on the network 20 AM Peak Period Auto Volumes AM Peak Period Transit Volumes

Sum of the Choices Makes a Picture of Travel 21

Where are people age 10-20 at 1 pm?

University of They re Washington at school.

Sum of the Choices

Reminder: Levels of Transportation Modeling Time Daily Hour Minute Second Size Statewide Regional City Corridor / Neighborhood 25 Facility / Street

What is the model sensitive at this level? Number of Retail Jobs in a Parcel Cost of Parking in nearby parcels Amount of Congestion on I-5 Travel Time on Light Rail Lines Household Income Person Gender and Age Number of Students in a Household 26

What can t the model answer at this level? Traffic incidents and non-recurring delay Volumes on collectors How sidewalks make people walk more Car-sharing Person education level Person race 27

Average Commute Time (minutes) Average Commute Time by Mode 60 50 56 40 30 20 10 28 28 18 28 0 SOV HOV Transit Walk

Percent of Trips When are people traveling? 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% 11:00 PM 9:00 PM 7:00 PM 5:00 PM 3:00 PM 1:00 PM 11:00 AM 9:00 AM 7:00 AM 5:00 AM 3:00 AM 1:00 AM Trip Departure Time Hour 29

Geographically based outputs 30

Exploring Alternative Pictures of the Future What if autonomous vehicles increase roadway capacity, reduce travel times, and reduce parking costs?

Powerful for comparison Change in speed on the Tacoma Narrows if toll were removed Red means slower without toll, and green means faster without 32

Person Miles Walked 2,000,000 1,750,000 1,500,000 1,400,000 1,000,000 500,000 33 - With Tolls Without Tolls

More technical look at SoundCast

Python Controller Scripts Python scripts control the arrows in the model structure Set run iterations, convergence, process flow Initializes directories, projects, banks Controls demand models Transfers data from demand model to Emme for assignment and skimming Tests for convergence Summarizes model results

Input Configuration Runs are managed by an input configuration file Switch on/off model processes like: Basic directory setups Use seed trips, run assignment only Run specific sub-models like truck and external trips Holds variables and assumptions Values that might change across analyses and important to quickly validate later

PSRC Daysim Model Structure Purposes Work School/College Personal Business Shopping Meals Social/Rec Escort Home Modes SOV HOV2 HOV3+ Transit Walk Bike Time Resolution Choice Models 30 minutes Geographic Parcel Land Use 4000 zones for skimming and assignment 37

Daysim Model Structure 38 Long term Day Tour Trip/Stop Long Term Usual School and Work Locations Usual Travel Methods Auto Ownership Day Day Patterns and Tours Tour/Trip Destination Mode Schedule

Long-term choices 39 Long term Day Tour Trip/Stop Usual Work Location Usual School Location Auto Ownership Transit Pass Ownership Pay to Park at Workplace Usual Mode to Work

Daily choices 40 Long term Day Tour Trip/Stop Destination, Mode, Arrival and Departure Times (5-6 time periods in day) Intermediate Stop Generation Stop Location Trip Mode Trip Arrival or Departure Time (10-minute time periods)

Populating Trip Tables By Mode, Time ID Time Mode Origin Zone Destination Zone 1 567 SOV 123 456 2 890 Walk 789 1011 D D O 1 2 3 3700 1 2 3 3700 41

Overview Assignment/Skimming Process 12 Time Periods 21 User Classes Run Auto Assignment for each Time Period Transit (assigned) for 5 Time Periods, skimmed for 2 Skim for Time and Cost for all Time Periods Skim for Distance for Two Time Periods Run almost everything in Parallel

.

Value of time Daysim Continuous Assignment Discrete if vot < 15: vot_category=1 elif vot < 25: vot_category=2 else: vot_category=3

Overview Assignment/Skimming Process 12 Time Periods 21 User Classes Run Auto Assignment for each Time Period Transit for 5 Time Periods Skim for Time and Cost for all Time Periods Skim for Distance for Two Time Periods Run almost everything in Parallel

Assignment Details Emme Path-Traffic Assignment Closing Criteria.0001 relative gap Thinking about relaxing closing criteria in early iterations to speed up run time. Extended Transit Assignment Performs a frequency-based transit assignment using optimal strategies

Convergence Test Relative Trip-Weighted Average Absolute Skim Change By John Gibb, Of DKS: ij q t a t i ij qt a q = demand (trip table) t a = cumulative average skim travel time t i = this iteration travel time

STOP_THRESHOLD = 0.025 When do we stop? Configurable parameters: A list of travel time skims sent in for comparison

Software Design

DaySim Software and Hardware Software Programmed in C#, Visual Studio, Microsoft.Net platform Two levels of distributed processing for faster runs Distribution of households across different processors on a single machine. Higher level distribution of households to different physical or virtual machines. Inputs and outputs are integrated with any travel modeling package Same code used for model estimation and application Hardware 50 Runs on 64-bit Windows systems Expected minimum configuration: Single box with 4+ processing cores (more cores will reduce run times) 8 GB RAM (16 GB if using more than 1,500 zones)

DaySim: Estimate Model Coefficients In addition to the usual application mode, which generates simulated travel, there is an estimation mode that produces new coefficients from survey data. Survey Data Simulated Data Forecasts Estimation Mode DaySim Application Mode Network Software Alogit Model Coefficients Synthetic Population PopGen