A. INTRODUCTION For the Environmental Assessment, the term dune is used to describe the 14 to 16 foot elevation sand

Similar documents
ATLANTIC COAST OF LONG ISLAND, JONES INLET TO EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, LONG BEACH ISLAND, NY. Contract #2 Construction Scope. April 18th-19th 2018

Atlantic Coast of Long Island, Jones Inlet to East Rockaway Inlet, Long Beach Island, NY Construction Update

Delaware Chapter Surfrider Foundation - Indian River Inlet Monitoring

North Shore of Long Island, Feasibility Study

RE: Hurricane Matthew Beach Damage Assessment and Recommendations [CSE 2416]

New Orleans Municipal Yacht Harbor

2018 Beach Preservation Project Information

SPECIAL SPRING 2018 STORM REPORT ON THE CONDITION OF THE MUNICIPAL BEACHES FOR THE BOROUGH OF STONE HARBOR, CAPE MAY COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

UPPER BEACH REPLENISHMENT PROJECT RELATED

ATLANTIC COUNTY 2006 to 2008

30 DAY PUBLIC NOTICE MAINTENANCE DREDGING OF THE 8-FOOT CHANNEL OF THE FEDERAL NAVIGATION PROJECT IN KENNEBUNK RIVER KENNEBUNK & KENNEBUNKPORT, ME

Building Coastal Resiliency at Plymouth Long Beach

New Jersey Coastal Zone Overview. The New Jersey Beach Profile Network (NJBPN) 3 Dimensional Assessments. Quantifying Shoreline Migration

TRANSPORTATION NEEDS ASSESSMENT

Figure 106. Locations of the 28 NJBPN profile stations in Ocean County, NJ.

A REVIEW OF THE CONDITION OF THE MUNICIPAL BEACHES AS A RESULT OF HURRICANE SANDY IN THE BOROUGH OF STONE HARBOR, CAPE MAY COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

The 2017 Panama City Beaches Beach Interim Renourishment Project. Answers to Common Questions

Shoalwater Bay Shorline Erosion Dredging

Beach Renourishment in Jacksonville

Figure 38. Locations of the 28 NJBPN profile stations in Ocean County, NJ.

FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT

Broad Beach Sand & Dune Habitat Restoration Project. Revetment Owners Meeting July 12, 2017

Figure79. Location map for the 10 NJBPN profile sites in Atlantic County, NJ 155

Protecting our Beaches

COASTAL HAZARDS. What are Coastal Hazards?

Southeast Volusia Coastal Projects Update

Beach Dune Performance Assessment of. New Jersey Beach Profile Network (NJBPN) Sites at. Long Beach Island, New Jersey. After Hurricane Sandy

Design of Stanley Park S-Curve

5 CIRCULATION AND STREET DESIGN

Bay County, MI Coastal Hazard Analysis Flood Risk Review Meeting. May 14, 2018

6/19/2006 The Reef Ball Foundation 1

ALTERNATIVES FOR COASTAL STORM DAMAGE MITIGATION AND FUNCTIONAL DESIGN OF COASTAL STRUCTURES

FINAL REPORT FOR 2013 ON THE CONDITION OF THE MUNICIPAL OCEANFRONT BEACHES THE BOROUGH OF AVALON, CAPE MAY COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

Redondo Beach Boat Launch Ramp Facility

* Appalachian Mountains -the mountain range in the Eastern U.S. which terminates in north-central Alabama

ALTERNATIVES FOR COASTAL STORM DAMAGE MITIGATION

Absecon Island Shore Protection The planning behind the project

Appendix F: Public Access Plan

ROCKAWAY BOARDWALK RECONSTRUCTION Phase 4 (B86th B60th) Access Update October 28, 2014

2014 ANNUAL REPORT - TO THE CITY OF NORTH WILDWOOD ON THE CONDITION OF THE CITY BEACHES

Living Streets Policy

Beach profile surveys and morphological change, Otago Harbour entrance to Karitane May 2014 to June 2015

Gordon Proctor Director Policy on Accommodating Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel on ODOT Owned or Maintained Facilities

MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. WAY

UMDLOTI LIFEGUARD TOWER

PLAQUEMINES PARISH BARRIER ISLAND RESTORATION & SUSTAINABILITY. MVD/Gulf Coast Regional Dredging Meeting November 5, 2013

Building Great Neighbourhoods BELLEVUE AND VIRGINIA PARK

County of Santa Barbara Permit Option Analysis Goleta Beach JULY 13, 2017

Figure 41. Locations of the 28 NJBPN profile stations in Ocean County, NJ.

RI Regulatory Setbacks & Buffers: Coastal Management Issues

Fulton Market Streetscape

2013 ANNUAL REPORT - TO THE CITY OF NORTH WILDWOOD ON THE CONDITION OF THE CITY BEACHES

Assateague Island National Seashore North End Restoration Project Timeline

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ON BROWARD COUNTY SHORE PROTECTION PROJECT SEGMENTS II AND III BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

Americans with Disabilities Act Transition Plan for Public Right-of-Way Improvements

DELAWARE S VULNERABLE COASTAL AREAS. DELAWARE INLAND BAYS and DELAWARE BAY RECONNAISSANCE STUDY

Photo by: Darryl Hatheway, 2011

United States Department of the Interior

JAP Additional Information Sheet

Chapter 3: Multi-Modal Circulation and Streetscapes

RLRC COMMUNITIES EAST GRAND FORKS AREA CHARACTER THE RED LAKE RIVER & THE RED RIVER OF THE NORTH CONFLUENCE EAGLE POINT BOAT LAUNCH DESIGN

Sussex County, DE Preliminary Study Overview

DUNE STABILIZATION AND BEACH EROSION

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION

GONE! Coastal Erosion Happens During Storms! Why Worry About Coastal Setbacks? Goals for Today

Town of Duck, North Carolina

Henderson Ave. Complete Streets Project

HURRICANE SANDY LIMITED REEVALUATION REPORT UNION BEACH, NEW JERSEY DRAFT ENGINEERING APPENDIX SUB APPENDIX D SBEACH MODELING

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO Parks Department

NYS Coastal Waters. Water Resources of NYS: THE NATURE of the COASTAL ZONE. NYS Coastal Waters. NYS Coastal Atlas. Coastal Zone Management 10/10/2014

Long Beach Island Holgate Spit Little Egg Inlet Historical Evolution Introduction Longshore Transport Map, Survey and Photo Historic Sequence

Climate Change Impacts to KSC Launch Complex

ADA Training Accessible Pedestrian Signal (APS) 2018 MnDOT

Dauphin Island East End Beach and Barrier Island Restoration Project. Beau Buhring South Coast Engineers

STATUS REPORT FOR THE SUBMERGED REEF BALL TM ARTIFICIAL REEF SUBMERGED BREAKWATER BEACH STABILIZATION PROJECT FOR THE GRAND CAYMAN MARRIOTT HOTEL

Feasibility Report and Environmental Impact Statement. Coastal Storm Damage Reduction SURF CITY AND NORTH TOPSAIL BEACH, NORTH CAROLINA.

New Jersey Beach Profile Network Atlantic County Profile Site Locations

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 30, 2012

section 4 Existing Conditions, Issues, and Options

CHAPTER 281 INFLUENCE OF NEARSHORE HARDBOTTOM ON REGIONAL SEDIMENT TRANSPORT

CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Figure 4, Photo mosaic taken on February 14 about an hour before sunset near low tide.

Public Notice U.S. Army Corps In Reply to Application Number CENAB-OP-RMS (NATIONAL HARBOR (FORMERLY PORT Baltimore District AMERICA])

Building Great Neighbourhoods QUEEN ALEXANDRA

Fact Sheet Ordinance Regulating Erosion Threatened Structures

Roadway Classification Design Standards and Policies. Pueblo, Colorado November, 2004

PRESS RELEASE. Sandy Beach after the Christmas Trough

This report provides an overview of all the feedback received, key themes which emerged and the actions Grenadier will take in response.

ST. JOSEPH PENINSULA, GULF COUNTY, FLORIDA Beach Re-Nourishment and Environmental Enhancement Project RECOMMENDATIONS

Astoria Boulevard ADA and Station Renewal Track Improvements. February 19, 2019

The Case of the Disappearing Shoreline

Chapter 4 EM THE COASTAL ENGINEERING MANUAL (Part I) 1 August 2008 (Change 2) Table of Contents. Page. I-4-1. Background...

Dear Mr. Howard Ruben,

Coastal Hazards and Management in North Carolina. Braxton Davis April 14, 2015

Bob Battalio, PE Chief Engineer, ESA September 8, 2016

Volume and Shoreline Changes along Pinellas County Beaches during Tropical Storm Debby

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

Dare County Nourishment Project Town of Duck

Appendix K Pedestrian Bridge Feasibility Report. Rehabilitation and Restoration of the Longfellow Bridge

CURBSIDE ACTIVITY DESIGN

Transcription:

Chapter 1: Project Description A. INTRODUCTION The City of New York (the City) is proposing to enter into a grant agreement with the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to disburse Community Development Block Grant-Disaster Recovery (CDBG-DR) Funds for the reconstruction of the Rockaway Beach Boardwalk and related improvements in the borough of Queens, New York City, which Hurricane Sandy significantly damaged in October 2012 (See Figure 1-1). The City is the grantee of the CDBG-DR grant, and CDBG-DR funding will be provided to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), which is the Responsible Entity (RE) for environmental reviews. It is expected that the New York City Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) will administer this program, and the New York City Economic Development Corporation (NYCEDC) will be the funding subrecipient. PROJECT OVERVIEW As described below, New York City Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) would reconstruct the boardwalk between Beach 20th and Beach 126th Streets, would provide structured access to the beach between Beach 126th and Beach 149th Streets over new dunes currently being constructed by the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) 1, and would maintain the existing at-grade crossings through the existing dunes between Beach 9th and Beach 20th Streets. Figures 1-2 through 1-6 provide an overview of the project site. This Environmental Assessment (EA) describes the proposed project and assesses its potential environmental effects. Over the course of the next few years, DPR will also be developing urban design and open space design concepts for existing parkland in the greater area of the Rockaway Peninsula to the east and west of the project area as well as north of the boardwalk as it connects to the local pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicular traffic network. The new boardwalk would be an integral part of the Rockaway Gateway Greenway, and this larger conceptual Rockaway Peninsula Plan will look at all lands north of the boardwalk to the DPR property line and craft a vision of a restored landscape and recreational facilities that are integrated with the raised and reconstructed boardwalk. The plan is intended to address knitting together various DPR open space parcels with each other, with adjacent streets, and with the boardwalk. The boardwalk reconstruction (the specific subject project of this EA) will inform and is intended to not preclude components that may be developed as part of a future plan for the larger Rockaway Peninsula. 1 For the Environmental Assessment, the term dune is used to describe the 14 to 16 foot elevation sand fill that runs along the ocean-side edge of the boardwalk. This dune would not be considered as protected habitat, and the USACE defines this as beach with no restrictions on public access or use. 1-1

1.22.14 JAMAICA BAY N A T L A N T I C O C E A N New York Connecticut 0 1 2 MILES SCALE Proposed Reconstructed Boardwalk New Jersey Area of Detail Existing Dunes Proposed Crossing Structures Proposed (No-Action) Sand Fencing Approximate Project Site Location: 73 48' 4" W 40 35' 11" N USGS Topographic Map Far Rockaway Quadrangle Figure 1-1

BEACH 127 ST BEACH 125 ST BEACH 124 ST BEACH 123 ST BEACH 122 ST BEACH 121 ST BEACH 120 ST BEACH 119 ST BEACH 118 ST BEACH 117 ST BEACH 114 ST BEACH 112 ST O A W BEACH 111 ST BEACH 110 ST 12.31.13 BEACH CHANNEL DRIVE NEWPORT AVE R C K A Y F R E E W A Y ROCKAWAY BEACH BLVD BEACH 126 ST BEACH 116 ST BEACH 115 ST BEACH 113 ST BEACH 109 ST OCEAN PROMENADE N A T L A N T I C O C E A N Boardwalk Boardwalk Access 0 200 500 FEET SCALE Existing Boardwalk Access Rockaway Park/Belle Harbor Figure 1-2

BEACH 110 ST 12.31.13 JAMAICA BAY BEACH 109 ST BEACH 108 ST ROCKAWAY BEACH BLVD BEACH 105 ST BEACH 104 ST B E A C BEACH CHANNEL DR H 1 0 L N 2 S I D E V S E A A E BEACH 102 ST BEACH 101 ST BEACH 100 ST BEACH 99 ST BEACH 98 ST BEACH 97 ST BEACH 96 ST BEACH 95 ST CROSS BAY PKWY BEACH 93 ST BEACH 92 ST BEACH CHANNEL DRIVE BEACH 91 ST HOLLAND AVE BEACH 90 ST BEACH 89 ST BEACH 88 ST HOLLAND AVE BEACH 87 ST BEACH 86 ST BEACH 84 ST BEACH 85 ST BEACH 84 ST BEACH 81 ST BEACH 80 ST BEACH 79 ST BEACH 77 ST BEACH BREEZE PL BEACH 75 ST BEACH 74 ST BOARDWALK SHORE FRONT PKWY BEACH 74 ST BEACH 73 ST N A T L A N T I C O C E A N Boardwalk Boardwalk Access 0 400 1000 FEET SCALE Existing Boardwalk Access Seaside Figure 1-3

12.31.13 BEACH 73 ST BURCHELL AVE BEACH 72 ST BEACH 68 ST BEACH 70 ST BEACH 69 ST BEACH FRONT RD BEACH 67 ST ALMEDA AVE ROCKAWAY BEACH BLVD BEACH 61 ST BEACH 66 ST BEACH 65 ST BEACH 64 ST BEACH 63 ST BURCHELL RD BEACH 60 ST BEACH 59 ST BEACH 58 ST BEACH 57 ST A R V E R N E B LV D BEACH 56 PL BEACH 56 ST ALMEDA AVE BEACH 54 ST BEACH 53 ST BEACH 51 ST BEACH 52 ST BEACH 51 ST C O N C H P L BEACH 49 ST BEACH 48 ST NORTON AVE BEACH 47 ST BEACH 46 ST ROCKAWAY BEACH BLVD ROCKAWAY FREEWAY B O A R D W A L K BEACH 44 ST BEACH 45 ST BEACH 43 ST BEACH 42 ST BEACH 41 ST BEACH 40 ST BEACH 39 ST BEACH 38 ST BEACH 37 ST BEACH 37 ST BEACH 36 ST BEACH 36 ST BEACH 35 ST BEACH 34 ST DWIGHT AVE BAY 32 ST BEACH 33 ST SPRAYVIEW AVE FALCON AVE O C E A N C R E S T BEACH 32 ST B E A C H C H A N N E L FAR ROCKAWAY BLVD SEAGIRT BLVD BEACH 30 ST B R O O K H A V E N BEACH 29 ST BEACH 27 ST CORNAGA AVE B LV D D R A V E D E E R F I E L D BEACH 28 ST MARVIN ST G R A S S M E R E C O L L I E R A V E BEACH 26 ST R D CA M P R D E D G EM E R E A V E BEACH 25 ST BEACH 24 ST T E R R A C E CREST RD NEW HAVEN AVE E L K DR BEACH 21 ST 2 0 S T B E A C H N A T L A N T I C O C E A N Boardwalk Boardwalk Access 0 800 1600 FEET SCALE Existing Boardwalk Access Arverne East/Far Rockaway Figure 1-4

BEACH 149 ST BEACH 148 ST BEACH 147 ST BEACH 146 ST BEACH 145 ST BEACH 144 ST BEACH 143 ST BEACH 142 ST BEACH 141 ST BEACH 139 ST BEACH 138 ST BEACH 137 ST BEACH 136 ST BEACH 135 ST BEACH 134 ST BEACH 133 ST BEACH 132 ST BEACH 131 ST BEACH 130 ST BEACH 128 ST BEACH 127 ST BEACH 125 ST 12.31.13 BEACH CHANNEL DR NEWPORT AVE NEWPORT AVE BEACH 140 ST BEACH 129 ST BEACH 126 ST ROCKAWAY BEACH BLVD OCEAN PROMENADE N A T L A N T I C O C E A N Boardwalk USACE Dune Crossing Structure 0 400 800 FEET SCALE Crossing Structures Figure 1-5

CREST RD BEACH 20 ST BEACH 19 ST BEACH 17 ST 2.5.14 BEACH 17 ST BEACH 15 ST BEACH 14 ST BEACH 13 ST BEACH 12 ST BEACH 11 ST SEAGIRT BLVD BEACH 16 ST SEAGIRT BLVD BOARDWALK SEAGIRT AV BEACH 9 ST BEACH 8 ST BOARDWALK N Existing Dunes USACE Dune Proposed (No-Action) Sand Fencing Access Locations 0 500 FEET SCALE Existing Dunes and Proposed (No-Action) Sand Fencing Figure 1-6

Rockaway Boardwalk Reconstruction B. PURPOSE AND NEED Hurricane Sandy damaged neighborhoods, beaches, and DPR facilities in many locations. In the Rockaways, the hurricane damaged most of the approximately 4.7-mile length of the Rockaway Boardwalk. Except for sections that were reconstructed prior to the summer of 2013, as well as short sections of the boardwalk that survived the storm, the boardwalk remains damaged, unusable, and dangerous. The proposed project would restore a damaged recreational resource while increasing the resiliency of the boardwalk against future storms. As described below, the reconstructed boardwalk would be designed to be above the 100-year Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) storm surge levels. Rockaway Beach and Boardwalk is a vital community and City-wide recreational resource. It is used by millions of visitors annually and defines the character of the Rockaway communities that are adjacent to the approximately six miles of beach from Beach 9th Street to Beach 149th Street. The City s ability to rebuild key gateways prior to the 2013 beach season referred to as islands of rebuilt sections of the boardwalk that include concessions, comfort stations, restroom facilities, DPR offices, and life-guard stations was a critical step in ensuring continued access and enjoyment of Rockaway Beach. The re-opening of a continuous boardwalk will fully enhance and restore a unique resource of Rockaway Beach. West of Beach 126th, the provision of structures to cross new USACE dunes (including Americans with Disabilities Act [ADA] accessible locations) will also enhance beach access while helping to protect the newly created dune. As the grantee of the funds, the City will not be limited to returning to pre-disaster conditions as HUD encourages the use of CDBG-DR Funds to carry out activities that not only address disaster-related impacts, but leave communities more sustainably positioned to meet the needs of their post-disaster populations and to further prospects for growth. The proposed project is being designed to address these broader goals for the Rockaway Peninsula. C. COORDINATION OF PROPOSED PROJECT WITH USACE BEACH RENOURISHMENT The proposed reconstruction of the Rockaway Boardwalk is being developed in close collaboration and coordination with USACE regarding current and future beach renourishment and flood control projects. As part of an initial beach replenishment effort authorized by Congress, USACE placed approximately 6.3 million cubic yards of sand between Beach 19th and Beach 149th Streets in the 1970s to construct a 100-foot-wide beach at an elevation of 10 feet above mean sea level. This project also included construction of one groin/jetty at Beach 149th Street. USACE conducted beach renourishments to maintain the beach in 1980, 1982, 1984, 1986, and 1988. Several subsequent storms seriously eroded the shoreline, and a second major beach fill renourishment was undertaken between 1995 and 2004. After Hurricane Sandy in October 2012 and other recent severe storms, USACE is currently conducting on an emergency basis beach fill renourishment along Rockaway Beach to generally restore the project area to its original design profile from Beach 19th Street to Beach 149th Street (see Figure 1-7). In addition, a new dune constructed at an elevation of 14 to 16 feet will be constructed along the north edge of the beach, adjacent to the existing boardwalk right-of-way. Approximately 3.5 million cubic yards of sand dredged from East Rockaway Inlet 1-2

1.22.14 RAISED BOARDWALK BEACH EXTENSION 20 15 10 5 0 DUNE USACE Renourishment Project Figure 1-7

Chapter 1: Project Description and an offshore borrow area will be placed along the beach within the project area. The USACE beach fill renourishment is ongoing and is expected to be completed by summer 2014. It is expected that the current renourishment program will be amended by a betterment that would utilize the project s volume of sand in a manner to raise the level of the USACE dune from 14 to 16 feet in height (with a 25 foot crest), cover over existing trap bags, and provide for additional fine grading to allow for vehicular and pedestrian access. The proposed betterment agreement would be implemented between Beach 19th and Beach 149th Streets and is being developed in coordination with DPR, USACE, and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC). USACE intends to maintain the dune and renourish it as necessary. In addition, DPR, in the future with or without the proposed project, would plant cape beach grass on the top of the USACE dune from Beach 20th Street to approximately Beach 73rd Street and on the top and seaward side of the dune from Beach 73rd Street to approximately Beach 149th Street. Planted areas would be protected by sand fencing until the vegetation becomes established. USACE is also undertaking a long-term reformulation study that will look at beach renourishment and flood protection for the entire Rockaway Peninsula. That study is expected to begin a public review and planning process in 2014 that will identify and select a long-term plan. USACE is expected to issue final flood protection recommendations in 2015 with implementation thereafter. While the proposed boardwalk reconstruction project is independent of these USACE initiatives, the City is coordinating its efforts with USACE to maximize compatibility and to ensure that the boardwalk, along with current USACE beach renourishment and long term reformulation programs that are implemented in the future, will provide resiliency and protection for the new boardwalk itself as well as the adjacent community. D. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT The proposed project would complete the reconstruction of the boardwalk and would increase the resiliency of the boardwalk from Beach 20th Street to Beach 126th Street. In addition, between Beach 126th and Beach 149th Streets, the proposed project includes providing new access to the beach with stairs and ramps across the new dunes currently being constructed by USACE. It is expected that the new structures would be located at each street end and that up to four locations would also have access ramps that are ADA compliant. From Beach 9th to Beach 20th Streets, the proposed project will maintain the five existing at-grade crossings through the existing dunes (see Figure 1-6). PHASE I TARGETED REPAIRS In the first part of 2013, targeted repairs were made to sections of the boardwalk to allow their limited use during the summer. Located at Beach 117th, Beach 106th Street, Beach 97th Street, and Beach 86th Street, these repaired sections (or islands ) include beach access, lifeguard stations, restroom facilities, and DPR offices. The construction of replacement restroom facilities at Beach 67th Street is forthcoming. In addition, concrete baffle-walls were installed along the beach between Beach 126th and Beach 149th Streets to replace the walls that were lost in the storm, and trapbags were installed as a temporary protective measure between approximately Beach 55th and Beach 149th Streets. The completed and ongoing work associated with the Phase I Targeted Repairs are considered a separate action that have and will occur with or without the proposed project. 1-3

Rockaway Boardwalk Reconstruction INTERIM CONNECTION BETWEEN BEACH 35TH AND BEACH 39TH STREETS There are currently several sections of boardwalk surface that are completely absent due to storm damage. One of these gaps currently exists between Beach 35th and Beach 39th Streets. Because the initial phase of boardwalk reconstruction is proposed to begin at Beach 86th Street and move west toward Beach 126th Street, reconstruction on the eastern end of the peninsula (including this stretch in the 30 s) is not immediate. Therefore, the City is proposing to close this gap with an interim connection. The proposed temporary structure will use salvaged ipe stringers that were recovered from the damaged boardwalk. These stringers will be placed on and anchored to the existing concrete piles, with timber decking placed on the stringers. The width of the deck will be approximately 12 feet and will be connected to the existing boardwalk at Beach 35th and Beach 39th Streets. The approximate linear footage of the gap in the boardwalk between Beach 35th and Beach 39th Streets is 1,075 linear feet. The labor force will be provided in-house by DPR and Agency expense funds will be used for the project CDBG-DR funds will not be requested for this interim connection. Once this section is complete, the entire stretch of boardwalk between Beach 9th and Beach 60th Streets will be usable for the 2014 beach season and beyond. SAND FENCING BETWEEN BEACH 9TH AND BEACH 20TH STREETS In the future with or without the proposed project, DPR intends to install sand fencing that would aid in the gradual formation of a sand dune beyond the eastern end of the USACE dune in order to provide flood protection to communities between Beach 9th and Beach 20th Streets (see Figure 1-6). The sand fencing would be placed in two parallel rows approximately 20 feet apart, adjacent to and in approximate alignment with the eastern terminus of the USACE dune and landward of the existing natural dunes that occur in this area. Pedestrian access would be maintained through five at-grade openings in the sand fencing, where pedestrian access is now in the vicinity of Beach 19th, Beach 16th and Beach 9th Streets. As described in Chapter 3, Section E, Natural Resources, existing pedestrian access at Beach 19th Street will be maintained outside of the piping plover nesting season, and restricted by DPR as necessary during the nesting season if there is nesting activity in the area, as recommended by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). As within the interim connection, CDBG-DR funds will not be requested for the construction of the sand fencing. BOARDWALK RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT ELEMENTS The basic elements of the boardwalk reconstruction include new foundations and pilings with the removal of the existing foundations, a sand-retaining wall, the boardwalk surface and structural elements, and the filling in with sand of the area under the boardwalk and the area between the boardwalk and the USACE dune (see Figures 1-8 through 1-9). In addition, all public stairs and ramps connecting local streets with the boardwalk that were in use before Hurricane Sandy will be rebuilt, although some design modifications are required to accommodate additional elevation of the boardwalk such as longer ramps and stairways. Figure 1-10 represents a typical length of the boardwalk that has been advanced through preliminary design in order to expedite the proposed first project phase between Beach 87th and Beach 97th Streets. The site plan shows the basic layout of the boardwalk (i.e., location of stairs, streetlights, benches, railings). Key elements of the boardwalk reconstruction are described in more detail below. 1-4

1.22.14 H-PILE BAFFLE-WALL SHORE SAND INFILL USACE DUNE NOTE: This is an in-progress drawing and does not reflect final design. Reconstructed Boardwalk Representative Axonometric Section Figure 1-8

1.22.14 RECONSTRUCTED BOARDWALK SAND INFILL USACE DUNE Reconstructed Boardwalk Representative Section at Beach 122nd Street Figure 1-9

1.22.14 N NOTE: This is an in-progress drawing and does not reflect final design. 0 100 250 FEET SCALE Reconstructed Boardwalk Typical Plan: Beach 87th to Beach 97th Streets Figure 1-10

Chapter 1: Project Description BOARDWALK FOUNDATION AND PILINGS The boardwalk will largely be reconstructed in its pre-existing alignment with a new foundation system. The original concrete foundations (also referred to as bents ) consist of three to four concrete piles attached by a concrete pile cap. The bents are spaced at approximately 19 feet along the site for a total of approximately 1,306 pile bents. Testing and evaluation of the original concrete bents has indicated chloride contamination that may limit the life of the existing piles. Therefore, new steel bents would be installed, and all of the original concrete bents in the way of new construction will be removed. It is currently envisioned that these new bents would be based on two new piles and would be spaced approximately 30 feet apart. All the new pile caps would extend approximately two feet beyond the northern edge of the boardwalk so that new light fixtures or other bump-outs can be located in some places without limiting the usable width of the boardwalk. All bump-outs that existed prior to storm damage (which could be on either the north or south sides of the boardwalk) would be rebuilt as they previously existed and would not require any new pilings to support. New bump-outs could be located about every half mile along the reconstructed boardwalk and could be based on three new piles. SAND-RETAINING WALL AND SAND INFILL The proposed reconstruction will incorporate a sand-retaining wall underneath the boardwalk that would prevent sand migration and help to protect the adjacent community. The sandretaining wall would span the length of the boardwalk and would retain the volume of sand extending from the USACE dune under the boardwalk to the sand-retaining wall. The wall would also restrict blowing sand from passing under the boardwalk from the beach to the inland area. Similar to the baffle-walls that have been rebuilt between Beach 126th and Beach 149th Streets, the sand-retaining wall underneath the boardwalk would likely be attached to H-piles and would be composed of concrete panels between the flanges. The panels would be attached to the piles so that the bottom of the slab is two feet above the calculated erosion depth of +5 feet North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88). During an extreme storm event, the scour would open a gap beneath the wall, allowing some water to pass under the wall. The sand-retaining wall is being designed to retain the force of saturated sand fill behind it and, therefore, the static pressure of water. It is not being designed to withstand the dynamic energy of waves, since the wall would be protected by the USACE dune, the sand between the dune and the wall, and the renourished beach that will extend 200 feet seaward from the dune. As shown in Figure 1-8 the project would infill sand between the sand-retaining wall and the top of the adjacent USACE dune. The approximately 475,000 cubic yards of sand fill would result in additional sand under the boardwalk, and with no gap between the elevation of the new boardwalk height and the adjacent USACE dune there would be a relatively flat crossing of the dune before dropping down to the main beach area. Following USFWS recommendations, the sand fill would be generally consistent with the grain size of the naturally occurring beach sand. The sand-retaining wall and infill sand are not considered flood or erosion control features but the additional sand volume would enhance resiliency by providing an extended period of controlled erosion (particularly if combined with future renourishment) before the sand-retaining wall or inland areas are directly affected. BOARDWALK SURFACE, FURNITURE, AND ACCESS The boardwalk surface would be constructed of large, concrete planks and, unlike the pre-storm wooden boardwalk decking, the concrete planks will be secured to their foundations and cannot 1-5

Rockaway Boardwalk Reconstruction float. The boardwalk reconstruction project would include lights, benches, drinking fountains, bike racks and other amenities that may be identified in the design process. It is currently expected that light poles would be located along the northern side of the boardwalk, outside of the railing on pile caps that extend beyond the boardwalk surface by approximately two feet. The light poles are currently planned to be spaced 120 feet apart, and they would be positioned to shine southward, away from any adjacent buildings along the north side of the boardwalk. Solar-powered lighting was investigated as a means of reducing energy consumption by using a renewable resource, but because the New York City Department of Transportation (NYCDOT) will maintain the lighting, a NYCDOT-approved fixture will be required, and no such solarpowered lighting fixture could be identified. However, it could be possible to select an approved fixture that uses LED s rather than incandescent bulbs, which would result in less energy demand. Consideration will still be given to using solar-powered accent lighting at special areas such as boardwalk entrances and plazas. Groups of benches would be located along the southern side of the boardwalk. New ADA-compliant public access ramps would be provided to replace those damaged in the storm. There are approximately 125 access points to the boardwalk that existed prior to the storm and that generally correspond to public streets (see Figures 1-2 through 1-5 for the locations of existing and historic public access points). The work proposed for these existing and future access points would include redesign to meet the new boardwalk elevation. There will be no direct private connections to the rebuilt boardwalk, including from properties that were connected prior to the storm. No new public access points are currently envisioned and all access points would take place within the boardwalk right-of-way and on previously disturbed areas. The boardwalk foundation, the boardwalk planks, stairs and ramps, lights, benches, railings and other finishing items have been designed in accordance with American Society of Civil Engineers standards for Flood Resistant Design and Construction (Standard 24-05). Therefore, elements of the reconstructed boardwalk would not be expected to break apart and become hazards during future storm events. BOARDWALK ELEVATION As shown in Figures 1-11a to 1-11c, an overall goal of the project is to raise the new boardwalk to an elevation up to three feet above the 100-year FEMA storm surge levels that vary along the site from +13 feet to +17 feet North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88). The existing elevations of the tops of the pile caps vary from +10.4 feet to +14.56 feet NAVD 88. This new elevation would result in raising the new boardwalk sections from approximately 1.4 feet at the eastern portion of the site to approximately 8.0 feet to the west. These elevations would vary to accommodate existing structures and to minimize changes in boardwalk elevations. Raising the boardwalk serves two purposes. First, the reconstructed boardwalk would be above the 100-year design flood elevations that would help guard against catastrophic destruction in the event of a future super storm. Second, the boardwalk would be designed to allow users to continue to view and access the beach in the event that dune structures or other protective measures under consideration by USACE are constructed under a separate project. BOARDWALK WIDTH The typical boardwalk section is 40 feet wide, and the project proposes to rebuild all boardwalk areas generally to that width. However, the alignment of the boardwalk may be straightened out 1-6

12.31.13 N Reconstructed Boardwalk Expected Boardwalk Elevation Changes Figure 1-11a

12.31.13 N Reconstructed Boardwalk Expected Boardwalk Elevation Changes Figure 1-11b

12.31.13 N Reconstructed Boardwalk Expected Boardwalk Elevation Changes Figure 1-11c

Chapter 1: Project Description in certain sections and the boardwalk footprint may be shifted in the north or south direction between approximately 5 to 10 feet to provide a more continuous boardwalk length. In addition, consistent with the existing footprint of the boardwalk, certain locations may have a bump-out to accommodate stair and ramp landing areas (particularly in creating ADA-compliant access points to the new boardwalk height) and other facilities such as locations for benches and other amenities. These bump-outs may extend from approximately 5 to 15 feet for a total width of approximately 55 feet. For example, Figure 1-12 shows a detail for a beach-side landing area that existed prior to the storm and will be rebuilt as part of the project. New bump-outs of up to five feet do not require any additional piles or foundation support, and it is expected that one new bump out every half mile could be implemented. Any new and existing and rebuilt bumpouts that extend up to 10 feet based on the pre-storm footprint could have bents comprised of three piles. Nowhere will the reconstructed boardwalk intrude seaward of the mean high water spring elevation. The structural design would support concrete planks of textured pre-cast concrete panels. The supports and the boardwalk surface would be designed for buoyancy and wave forces. (See Chapter 3, Section F, Construction for more detail on the design and structural system of the reconstructed boardwalk.) TYPICAL BOARDWALK CONDITIONS There are four typical boardwalk conditions that need to be addressed in the boardwalk reconstruction effort. The existing impairments and likely treatments are described below: No boardwalk surfaces. In areas where no boardwalk structure remains other than the existing piles and caps, these structures would be removed and replaced where they are in the way of new construction. All new bents would be installed as described above. H piles for the sand-retaining wall would be installed concurrently with the new boardwalk bents. Damaged or obsolete wood and concrete boardwalks. All wood and appurtenances would likely need to be removed, and all concrete foundations would be removed where they are in the way of new construction. The new boardwalks would then be built at a higher elevation on new bents as described above. Intact concrete boardwalks. Several concrete sections survived the storm intact. However, because they are below the new expected boardwalk heights developed in consideration of new 100-year storm surge levels and future sea rise considerations, the reconstruction would dismantle the concrete boardwalk topping, install new steel bents, and then reuse, where applicable, the concrete boardwalk sections that are in good condition. Rebuilt islands. The islands are the boardwalk areas that that were rebuilt since the storm in cast-in-place concrete and provided important beach amenities and service in time for the 2013 beach season. They are focal points of activity, generally in line with surface transportation, and include amenities such as washrooms and lifeguard stations. Because of the high level of design, the relationships to existing buildings, and the disruption that the reconstruction of these structures would entail, it is anticipated that these islands would be left in place. The islands at Beach 86th and Beach 97th Streets are already above the 100- year flood elevation. For the Beach 106th and Beach 117th Street islands, which are below the elevations of the new boardwalk, additional flood control measures would be incorporated at these locations including solutions such as trapbags that can be put in place when a major storm event is forecast. 1-7

1.22.14 NEW LIGHT FIXTURES (TYPICAL) BENCHES (TYPICAL) 40 50 STAIRS STAIRS N NOTE: This is an in-progress drawing and does not reflect final design. 0 10 25 FEET SCALE Reconstructed Boardwalk Typical Conditions: Beach 94th Street Typical Bump Out Location Figure 1-12

Rockaway Boardwalk Reconstruction DUNE CROSSING STRUCTURES Between Beach 9th and Beach 20th Streets, five existing at-grade crossings would be maintained to facilitate pedestrian access through the existing dunes and help protect the dunes by controlling and limiting flow through them (see Figure 1-6). Between Beach 126th Street and Beach 149th Street, dune crossing structures would similarly be located at each street end. Up to four crossings in this 23 block area would also include ADA-compliant ramp access. Figure 1-13 presents typical dune crossing structures for both regular and ADA-compliant applications. It is assumed that the structures would be made from recycled high-density polyethylene planks, often referred to as plastic wood. Figure 1-14 shows the location of the at-grade crossings through the dunes between Beach 20th and Beach 9th Streets. PROJECT PHASING The reconstruction of the Rockaway Boardwalk between Beach 20th and Beach 126th Streets would take place in sections of approximately 10 to 20 blocks. As currently envisioned, construction would begin with the installation of the sand-retaining wall in sections of the boardwalk. The first phase of the reconstruction project would take place between Beach 86th and Beach 96th Street, with the subsequent phase taking place between Beach 98th and Beach 108th Street. See Chapter 3, Section F: Construction Impacts for a description of the remaining phases. As described above, sand fencing between Beach 9th and Beach 20th Streets and an interim connection between Beach 35th and Beach 39th Streets will be constructed independently of the proposed project, and it is expected that these improvements will be completed in early 2014. The proposed project would also provide access to the beach between Beach 126th and Beach 149th Streets over new dunes currently being constructed by USACE. It is expected that the construction of the proposed project would require approximately three years, accounting for seasonal restrictions. Based on current plans, construction would begin in early 2014 and be completed at some time in 2017. E. REQUIRED APPROVALS The proposed project requires certain public approvals and permits to be implemented. These are summarized below: HUD CDBG-DR Funding. The primacy of the HUD funding approval is the basis for completing the NEPA EA with HUD assuming the lead agency role. NYSDEC Tidal Wetland and Coastal Erosion Hazard Area (CEHA) Permits. The proposed project, including the reconstructed boardwalk, new dune crossing structures, and dune enhancements are generally located within the jurisdiction of the NYSDEC as structures and construction activity within the regulated Tidal Wetland Adjacent Area and the CEHA. F. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW OMB is responsible, pursuant to federal statute 42 U.S.C. 5304(g) as the recipient of HUD CDBG-DR funds, for conducting environmental reviews of projects receiving HUD funds in accordance with 24 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 58, as well as other laws and regulations. Because the proposed project is located in New York City and will involve actions by both the State and the City, the CEQR Technical Manual generally serves as a guide with respect to methodologies and impact criteria for evaluating the proposed project. Accordingly, 1-8

12.31.13 0 10 25 FEET SCALE Street End Beach Access 126th to 149th Streets Option 3: Recycled Plastic Lumber Platform & ADA Ramps Figure 1-13

2.5.14 N USACE Dune Proposed (No-Action) Sand Fencing Access Locations Beach 9th to 20th Streets At-Grade Access and Proposed (No-Action) Sand Fencing Figure 1-14

Chapter 1: Project Description this environmental review is being prepared in accordance with NEPA, the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), and City Environmental Quality Review (CEQR). In addition, the review of the Proposed Project has been coordinated with review pursuant to other applicable laws and regulations, such as Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (NHPA) and Section 2(a)(4) of Executive Order (EO) 11988 for Floodplain Management. 1-9