Dynamic Network Behavior of Offshore Wind Parks

Similar documents
THE HORNS REV WIND FARM AND THE OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE WITH THE WIND FARM MAIN CONTROLLER

Wind farm Simulink modelling and control through dynamic adjustment of wind turbines power set-point Saman Poushpas, Prof. W.

WINDSPEED project: Assessing future offshore grid infrastructure

Connecting wind energy THE OFFSHORE GRID IN THE NETHERLANDS

DIRECTION DEPENDENCY OF OFFSHORE TURBULENCE INTENSITY IN THE GERMAN BIGHT

Wind measurements that reduce electricity prices

Comparison of Wind Turbines Regarding their Energy Generation.

Wind turbine Varying blade length with wind speed

SAFE DESIGN OF RURAL ROADS BY NORMALIZED ROAD CHARACTERISTICS

Offshore wind power in the Baltic sea

1200 MW Wind Generation: 20 Year Transmission Development Plan - Exploratory Study

Scaling up of ADAS Traffic Impacts to German Cities

AN ISOLATED SMALL WIND TURBINE EMULATOR

Offshore grid NL. Hollandse Kust (noord) & Hollandse Kust (west Alpha) General project introduction. 14 september 2018

PIG MOTION AND DYNAMICS IN COMPLEX GAS NETWORKS. Dr Aidan O Donoghue, Pipeline Research Limited, Glasgow

Electricity Generation from Wind Energy Prof. Wonhee Kim

WINDSPEED. Resultat og erfaringer med MSP. 26. september 2013 Hans Chr. Sørensen, SPOK ApS. Contract number: EIE/07/759/S

Offshore Micrositing - Meeting The Challenge

OFFSHORE WIND Kosten heute und morgen welche Potentiale zur Kostensenkung gibt es

International Research Journal of Electronics and Computer Engineering Vol 1(3) Oct-Dec 2015

7 YEARS METEOMAST AMRUMBANK WEST

Analysis of Pressure Rise During Internal Arc Faults in Switchgear

AUSTRIAN RISK ANALYSIS FOR ROAD TUNNELS Development of a new Method for the Risk Assessment of Road Tunnels

V MW. Exceptional performance and reliability at high-wind-speed sites. vestas.com

Sea-going vessel versus wind turbine

Umbilicals Experience and Challenges, Tie Back installations

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON THE DISCHARGE CHARACTERISTICS OF SLUICE FOR TIDAL POWER PLANT

Row / Distance from centerline, m. Fan side Distance behind spreader, m 0.5. Reference point. Center line

Workshop Session 1: Resources, technology, performance

IEEE, (2014) ISBN

System Operating Limit Definition and Exceedance Clarification

WAVES ENERGY NEAR THE BAR OF RIO GRANDE'S HARBOR ENTRANCE

Changes in speed and efficiency in the front crawl swimming technique at 100m track

Computational Fluid Dynamics

Introduction to Wind Energy Systems

Pressure coefficient on flat roofs of rectangular buildings

CONTROL STRATEGIES FOR LARGE WIND TURBINE APPLICATIONS

Computer Simulation Programms in Mine Rescue Education and Training, on the Example of Student Mine Rescue Teams

Offshore Wind Energy in Germany Development and Outlook

Parametric Investigation of Dynamic Characteristics of Mooring Cable of Floating-type Offshore Wind Turbine

A Depletion Compensated Wet Bath Simulator For Calibrating Evidential Breath Alcohol Analyzers

Innovation Electrical Industry

3.6 Magnetic surveys. Sampling Time variations Gradiometers Processing. Sampling

DETRMINATION OF A PLUNGER TYPE WAVE MAKER CHARACTERISTICE IN A TOWING TANK

Special Print. Innovative Control Technology. Control Valves with Extremely Fast and Precise Positioning Capabilities

Site Assessment Report. Wind farm: Ascog Farm (GB)

E. Agu, M. Kasperski Ruhr-University Bochum Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Sciences

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON THE HYDRODYNAMIC BEHAVIORS OF TWO CONCENTRIC CYLINDERS

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 53 (2014 )

Modelling of Wind Turbine Loads nearby a Wind Farm

Wind effects on tall building frames-influence of dynamic parameters

RESOURCE DECREASE BY LARGE SCALE WIND FARMING

V MW Versatile megawattage

Nordel GRID DISTURBANCE AND FAULT STATISTICS

The impact of different means of transport on the operation and maintenance strategy for offshore wind farms

WIND DIRECTION ERROR IN THE LILLGRUND OFFSHORE WIND FARM

Alstom Ocean Energy Path towards Industrailsation. Ken Street 18 th April 2013

FINO1 Mast Correction

Energy capture performance

Control. Internal and master controllers. Types of internal control

THE WAVE CLIMATE IN THE BELGIAN COASTAL ZONE

Numerical Simulation And Aerodynamic Performance Comparison Between Seagull Aerofoil and NACA 4412 Aerofoil under Low-Reynolds 1

Contributions from a multidisciplinary university Finn Gunnar Nielsen Professor Geophysical Institute

First studies with the high-resolution coupled wave current model CWAM and other aspects of the project Sea State Monitor

System Operating Limit Definition and Exceedance Clarification

FIVE YEARS OF OPERATION OF THE FIRST OFFSHORE WIND RESEARCH PLATFORM IN THE GERMAN BIGHT FINO1

1. Functional description. Application program usage. 1.1 General. 1.2 Behavior on bus voltage loss and bus voltage. 1.

WHITEPAPER. Integrated process monitoring of dosing pressures

Miscalculations on the estimation of annual energy output (AEO) of wind farm projects

PIKO IQ 4.2, Plenticore plus 4.2 Rating: 10,0kW 8,5kW 7,0kW 5,5kW 4,2kW Rated voltage: PIKO IQ 8.5, Plenticore plus 8.5

Wave Energy Atlas in Vietnam

Influence of HALO and drain-extension doping gradients on transistor performance

A Computational Assessment of Gas Jets in a Bubbly Co-Flow 1

CASE STUDY. Compressed Air Control System. Industry. Application. Background. Challenge. Results. Automotive Assembly

Outline. Wind Turbine Siting. Roughness. Wind Farm Design 4/7/2015

Hybrid Wave and Offshore Wind Farms: a Comparative Case Study of Co-located Layouts

EMPOWERING OFFSHORE WINDFARMS BY RELIABLE MEASUREMENTS

Turbine dynamics and power curve performance

Energy from wind and water extracted by Horizontal Axis Turbine

Lehigh-FIU Hybrid Wind Simulation Developments

Portuguese Market Outlook up to 2040

Influence of the Number of Blades on the Mechanical Power Curve of Wind Turbines

Wind Mills of the Mind Delivering large scale offshore wind. Andy Kinsella CEO, Offshore November 24th, 2011, Dundalk

VENTILATION OF PROTECTED AREAS IN ROAD TUNNELS

Experience with the design, manufacture, test and commercialisation of the REpower 6M turbine

Kodiak Electric Renewable Energy Implementation. Colin Young System Engineer 4/26/2016

CRYSTALLIZATION FOULING IN PACKED COLUMNS

On the use of rotor equivalent wind speed to improve CFD wind resource mapping. Yavor V. Hristov, PhD Plant Performance and Modeling Vestas TSS

Road Accident Analysis and Identify the black spot location On State Highway-5 (Halol-Godhra Section)

EE 364B: Wind Farm Layout Optimization via Sequential Convex Programming

MECHANICAL ASPECTS OF SUBMARINE CABLE ARMOUR

NUMERICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE FLOW BEHAVIOUR IN A MODERN TRAFFIC TUNNEL IN CASE OF FIRE INCIDENT

Maximizing Wind Farm Energy Production in Presence of Aerodynamic Interactions

Study of Passing Ship Effects along a Bank by Delft3D-FLOW and XBeach1

The Characteristics of Cavitation Bubbles Induced by the Secondary Shock Wave in an HM-3 Lithotripter and Its Effect on Stone Comminution

Shoreline Evolution Due to Oblique Waves in Presence of Submerged Breakwaters. Nima Zakeri (Corresponding Author), Mojtaba Tajziehchi

Wind Farm Blockage: Searching for Suitable Validation Data

OIL AND GAS INDUSTRY

Wave Propagation and Shoaling

A Conceptual Approach for Using the UCF Driving Simulator as a Test Bed for High Risk Locations

Transcription:

Dynamic Network Behavior of Offshore Wind Parks Thomas Ahndorf, M.Eng. Prof. Dr.-Ing. Rolf Witzmann TU- München Associated Institute of Power Transmission Systems 80333 Munich, Germany E-Mail: thomas.ahndorf@mytum.de Phone: +49 89 289 22006 Fax: +49 89 289 25089 Abstract-- Today there are around 60 offshore windpark projects planned in the area of the German North Sea with distances to the shoreline ranging from 30 to 200 km. The projects are divided into four clusters. Because of the high number of windparks and HVDC links assumed to be installed in future a good understanding of the dynamic behavior of the electrical system is necessary to guarantee overall system stability. This paper describes the investigation of the dynamic network behavior of offshore windparks and their grid connection with main focus on the system stability of the offshore grid and the overall system. In order to investigate the impact of the wind fluctuation on the onshore power system the maximum wind speed gradient has to be defined. For this the wind speed measurements of the FINO1 platform of the years 2006 are analyzed. Timeframes with very high variations of wind speed in the range of 1.2 m/s per second are identified and a profile with millisecond time steps is interpolated. Using that worst case wind profile together with the model of the wind turbine a variable power infeed is created and interpreted in terms of system interaction. Index Terms-- Offshore wind power; HVDC; wind speed gradient; system stability I. INTRODUCTION In the area of the German North Sea a lot of offshore wind power activity takes place. There are around 58 offshore wind parks (OWP) planned with a total number of more than 4500 wind turbine generators (WTG). The most wind parks will have a distance to the nearest suitable grid connection point of around 120 to 250 kilometer and a water depth of 20 to 50 meters. The first parks to be built are the test site Alpha Ventus and the first commercial one BARD Offshore 1, both started construction in 2009. Because of their location the OWP were combined into four clusters. Cluster DolWin, BorWin, SylWin and HelWin (see fig. 1). BorWi DolWin SylWin HelWin Fig.1: German North Sea area [2,3]. These clusters will be in the most cases connected to the nearest suitable onshore grid connection point via voltage source converter high voltage direct current (VSC HVDC) transmission. The VSC HVDC technology has multiple advantages compared to line commutated current HVDC or AC transmission. The most important advantages especially for offshore use are [5]: Inherent startup capability Enhanced Stability of power transmission together with long cables Decoupling the offshore and the

onshore grid resulting in maximum support of the wind generators during fault condition No synchronous compensator in the offshore grid is necessary Compact site area Lower losses in the transmission cables compared to AC transmission due to the lack of dielectric losses Independent active and reactive power control on both converters (within ratings) Dynamic control of the AC voltage in the offshore grid The aim of this paper is to get a good understanding of the variation of the wind turbine generator power infeed caused by variations in wind speed considering the dimension of an offshore wind park. Because of the dynamic behavior of the onshore transmission grid changes of power infeed can lead to oscillations in the whole system and under special circumstances to instabilities of it. The paper describes the correlation between the fast changes in wind speed and the corresponding power infeed profile. Figure 2 shows a typical layout of an offshore wind park consisting of 80 wind turbine generators and two 3-winding transformers. The distances between the windmills are 1000 meters in each direction. If a wind direction is assumed like it is marked in Figure 2 a sudden change in wind speed would be visible in the power infeed of the different generators but with a delay of: t d 1000m 1000m wind speed m s 2 2 1 [] s (1.1) 2 / To find the maximum variation of the power infeed a realistic wind speed profile is needed. For the year 2006 the FINO 1 platform collected nearly 300 million measured values for wind speed and direction in a one second interval [4]. To extract a realistic wind profile with high variation of wind speed the software Matlab was used. Fig. 2: Typical OWP layout. All measured values were imported into Matlab and sorted into an array. After that only the wind speed values in a height of 90 meters were extracted. Within these around 24 million values the time with the greatest wind speed gradient was demanded. With the help of an automated script all values were compared with the respective next value to find out the gradient. The mean gradient value of a time frame of 150 second was calculated and compared to a preset value to extract the wanted high wind speed variation time. Figure 3 shows 1800 seconds of the wind speed measurements in 90 meters height in one second increments of March 6 th 2006. At this time high fluctuations occurred. The maximum wind speed was 15.4 m/s and the minimum 4.5 m/s with a mean wind speed of 9.7 m/s. In the year 2006 were periods of time with higher wind speed gradients but with a maximum wind speed near or higher as the switch off value of the wind turbine generators. The limit for mean wind speed of 5 minutes was set to 10 m/s. Fig. 3: Wind speed [m/s] in 90 meter height, measured at FINO 1 at the 6th march 2006.

Using the wind speed and the equation 1.1 the delay t d between the generators is calculated. Each generator of the simulated wind park gets a 5 minute cut out of the profile in figure 3 depending on its position inside the wind park as an input value to calculate the power infeed. As a model of the wind turbine generators a standard double fed induction generator (DFIG) model of the used software PSS Netomac is chosen (see figure 4). All simulations were done in stability mode with a time step of one millisecond. Fig. 5: Power infeed [MW] (top) and wind profile [m/s] (bottom) of one wind turbine generator. Fig. 4: DFIG wind turbine generator model [1]. II. RESULTS Because of the 45 degree angle of the wind direction to the rows of wind turbine generators between one and eight generators get the same wind profile and as a result nearly the same power infeed (little differences are possible because of little differences in the voltage values inside the wind park). Figure 5 shows the wind profile and the resulting power infeed of one wind turbine generator. The maximum infeed is 4.72 megawatt and the minimum is 0.48 megawatt. Within 16 seconds the infeed reduces from 4.7 to 3.2 megawatt (time step around 100 s). Later a decrease from 3.12 to 0.8 megawatt during a time of 60 seconds was calculated (time step around 200 s). The gradients of one generator seems to be very high but together with the other wind turbine generators of one park a balancing effect smoothes the infeed of one wind park. Figure 6 shows the infeed of different generators in the same wind park. There are great differences in the power infeed of each generator caused by the delay mentioned above. The range is between <1 megawatt and 5 megawatt each at the same time. Fig. 6: Power infeed [MW] of 17 wind turbine generators in one wind park. The superimposed power infeed of all wind turbine generators of one offshore wind park is shown in figure 7.

The VSC HVDC link has nearly no influence on the variation. Only the transmission and converter losses bring the infeed to a lower level but the curve has the same characteristic. The voltage variation at the terminals of the 150 kv side of the wind park transformer is very low (see fig. 9). Fig. 7: Power infeed [MW] of one wind park into the offshore HVDC converter and into the onshore grid. Compared to the wind profile and the infeed of each wind turbine generator the fluctuation is much lower. A decrease of 14 megawatt in 16 seconds seems to be the maximum short term power gradient. That is a mean decrease per wind turbine generator of around 0.18 megawatt. The long term variation is a reduction of 60 megawatt (0.74 megawatt mean value per wind turbine generator) within 190 seconds. The smoothing effect is clearly visible. Figure 8 compares the mean infeed of all wind turbine generators and the infeed of a single generator. Fig. 8: Power infeed of one (bottom) generator and mean infeed over all wind turbine generators (top) [MW]. Fig. 9: Voltage [pu] at the 150 kv terminals of the wind park transformer. III. CONCLUSION The variation of power infeed for single wind turbine generators depends very strong on the wind profile. Because of the inertia of the wind turbines a smoothing effect can be seen. Nevertheless the variation in the studied high fluctuation wind speed scenario was up to 1.5 megawatt within 16 seconds respectively 6 megawatt per minute for a single wind turbine generator. Because of the dimension of an offshore wind park the power infeed also varies with the location of the single wind turbine generator within the wind park. The superposition of the infeed of all wind turbine generators provided the combined infeed of the wind park. The short term fluctuation is reduced to a mean value per wind turbine generator of 0.18 megawatt in 16 seconds (0.675 megawatt per minute). The HVDC link has nearly no influence to the characteristic of the infeed. It is anticipated that the combination of many offshore wind parks with different locations within an offshore wind park cluster will further improve the smoothing effect.

In ongoing studies the model of the fluctuating infeed is used to investigate the dynamic interaction between the onshore and the offshore grid under different loading scenarios. IV. REFERENCES [1] G. Duschl, H.-D. Pannhorst, O. Ruhle SIEMENS AG, Erlangen: Dynamic simulation of DFIGs for wind power plants using NETOMAC, Glasgow, 2005 [2] Bundesamt für Seeschifffahrt und Hydrographie: Nordsee Offshore Windparks Pilotgebiete. www.bsh.de; 08.09.2009 [3] ENTSO-E, grid map: www.entsoe.eu/resources/gridmap, 08.09.2009 [4] The German Federal Environment Ministry, Project Management Jülich Wind Energy, German Wind Energy Institute: Wind measurements of FINO I, 2006 [5] T. Ahndorf, R. Witzmann, S. Bopp: The German offshore grid A successful integration of offshore wind power, European Offshore Wind Conference 2007 - Berlin, Germany, 4-6 December 2007 V. BIOGRAPHIES Thomas Ahndorf received in 2004 his diploma in electrical power engineering and automation from the University of Applied Science in Karlsruhe, Germany. After this he started a postgraduate study also at the University of Applied Science in Karlsruhe and received his Master degree in Electrical Engineering in 2006 with distinction. Since 2006 Mr. Ahndorf worked at the Associated Institute of Power Transmission Systems of Technische Universität München as a Ph.D. student. His research is focused on the grid connection of large scale offshore wind power. Mr. Ahndorf is a member of the VDE Rolf Witzmann received the Dipl.-Ing. (M.S.E.E.) and the Dr.-Ing. (Ph.D.E.E.) degrees from Technische Universität München in 1982 and 1989, respectively. From 1990 to 2004 he was with Siemens AG in Erlangen, Berlin and Frankfurt. For more than 10 years he was Senior Consultant and Director in the Network Analysis and Consulting Division of the Power Transmission and Distribution Group. His fields of activity were stability of large interconnected power systems, HVDC-transmission, FACTS (Flexible AC Transmission Systems) and power quality. After this he was active in research and development being responsible for the R&D project in High-Temperature- Superconductivity. From 2002 he was head of technology department of the Medium Voltage Division of the Power Transmission and Distribution Group. In December 2004 Rolf Witzmann was appointed professor of Technische Universität München, Associated Institute of Power Transmission Systems. His main fields of activity are system stability, decentralized generation of renewable energy and the impact on the transmission and distribution systems.