IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

Age Ain t Nothing But a Number: A Critique of Application of the Non-statutory Labor Exemption in Clarett by Kaitlyn R. Kacsuta I.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION. Defendant. JURY DEMANDED PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE EASTERN DISTRICT

Case 1:16-cv BLW Document 1 Filed 06/22/16 Page 1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. KAYAK Software Corporation, by its attorneys, Foley & Lardner LLP, for its Complaint

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) I. PARTIES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ADA. Case No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA INDICTMENT INTRODUCTION. 1. Defendant DENNIS EARL HECKER, a resident of Minnesota,

Case 3:12-cv MAS-LHG Document 1 Filed 08/07/12 Page 1 of 12 PagelD: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT

Case Doc 1 Filed 10/06/09 Entered 10/06/09 18:33:53 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE RELIEF. Plaintiff, Defendants. I INTRODUCTION

Courtesy of

Case 2:13-cv RJS-EJF Document 2 Filed 08/27/13 Page 1 of 21

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Losing Collegiate Eligibility: How Mike Williams & Maurice Clarett Lost their Chance to Perform on College Athletics' Biggest Stage

Case 4:15-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 11/12/15 Page 1 of 12

CLEVELAND INDIANS GROUP TICKET SALES AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR TBE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. Civil Action No. J '.!- ~~! '. :.~,.~:..:.. r '.' ~~::-.

DC CAUSE NO.

COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY WARREN CIRCUIT COURT CIVIL ACTION NO. LAVONDA JOHNSON, GREG JOHNSON AND JALYN SAVAGE

WikiLeaks Document Release

TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE

The NBA Gets a College Education: An Antitrust and the Labor Analysis of the NBA's Minimum Age Limit

Case: 2:15-cv WOB-JGW Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/28/15 Page: 1 of 10 - Page ID#: 1

H 7184 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

Sports Law: Antitrust Suit Fails to Knock off NBA's Salary Cap

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

Upon Further Review: Reconsidering Clarett and Player Access to the NFL

Case 2:13-cv LKK-CKD Document 1 Filed 11/26/13 Page 1 of 14

Case 1:14-cv REB-KLM Document 1 Filed 10/03/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Rodeo Cowboys and AQHA: How Trade. Antitrust Conspiracy Claims. Thomas D. York

Yes, NBA Players Should Make More Money: How the NLRB can Change the Future of Collective Bargaining Agreements in Professional Sports

AMERICAN BASEBALL PLAYER RESERVE CLAUSE ISSUES RESURRECTED IN KOREA Luke Walker*

N.F.L. Collective Bargaining Agreement and an Uncapped Year Questions that Professional Football Fans Need Answers To. Outline for Sports Panel

COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-CI- DIVISION Electronically Filed

COMPLAINT FOR DESIGN PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND UNFAIR AND DECEPTIVE TRADE PRACTICES

Civil Action No. I* \Q ^\J bjo

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 7:17-cv RAJ Document 6 Filed 06/01/17 Page 1 of 12

Case 2:15-cv NBF Document 29 Filed 06/04/15 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION. Julie Brill Maureen K. Ohlhausen Joshua D. Wright Terrell McSweeny COMPLAINT

[First Reprint] SENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 216th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED APRIL 28, 2014

Filing Fee: $88.00 Category: A

Courthouse News Service

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA THIRD DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) INTRODUCTION

Case: 3:14-cv DAK Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/14/14 1 of 13. PageID #: 1

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY. Case No.

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRD JUDICAL DISTRICT AT ANCHORAGE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 4:13-cv KES Document 1 Filed 05/10/13 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Todd Fisher, Amateurism and Intercollegiate Athletics: The Double Standard of Section , 3 SPORTS LAW. J. 1 (1996)

CHAPTER 10 ANTITRUST AND SPORTS: PLAYER RESTRAINTS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CHURCHILL DOWNS INCORPORATED FOUNDATION Official Rules

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION

PlainSite. Legal Document. Washington Western District Court Case No. 2:11-cv Crossfit Inc. v. Moore et al. Document 1.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO.

CASE NO. COMPLAINT Plaintiff, Picheny Equestrian Enterprises, Inc. ("Picheny"), as and for its

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:17-cv APM Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 1 of 18. United States District Court District of Columbia

Illegal Procedure - The Rozelle Rule Violates the Sherman Antitrust Act

10/16/2017 1:51:20 PM 17CV45539 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

United States Figure Skating Association Eligible Skater s Compensation Agreement Program (ESCA)

PLAYER STATUS, PLAYER CONTRACTS AND PLAYER MOVEMENT REGULATIONS

Markets for Sports. Robert M. Coen. Professor Emeritus of Economics. Northwestern Alumnae Continuing Education. January 26, 2017

The Jocks and the Justice: How Sotomayor Restrained College Athletes

FOR THE LOVE OF THE GAME

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 11/29/18 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

THE FUTURE OF THE EQUINE INDUSTRY IN KENTUCKY: ANTITRUST CONCERNS AND THE AUSTRALIAN CASE. B. McHugh v. Australian Jockey Club Ltd., et al.

Best Hole in One Club Member ( Rules and Regulations )

the Central Intelligence Agency s Motion for Summary Judgment.

Net Receipts by Sector ( Million)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR WILSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Plaintiff CIVIL ACTION COMPLAINT

Case 1:18-cv UA Document 1 Filed 02/14/18 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK INTRODUCTION

NO PURCHASE IS NECESSARY TO ENTER OR WIN ANY PRIZE. A PURCHASE OR PAYMENT OF ANY KIND WILL NOT INCREASE YOUR CHANCES OF WINNING.

Icing the Competition: The Nonstatutory Labor Exemption and the Conspiracy between the NHL and OHL in NHLPA v. Plymouth Whalers Hockey Club

CONTACT: S. David Berst, NCAA Assistant Executive Director for Enforcement. II. Violations of NCAA legislation, as determined by committee.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Department of Recreation & Parks City of Lake Charles

Case 2:08-cv ROS Document 1 Filed 07/22/08 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

PAKISTAN CRICKET BOARD REGISTRATION OF AGENTS REGULATIONS, 2010

STATE OF INDIANA ) IN THE MARION SUPERIOR COURT ) CIVIL DIVISION COUNTY OF MARION )

Case 3:10-cv HRH Document 1 Filed 05/28/10 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA

USA WATER SKI U.S. TEAM AGREEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION

Sports Economics. Professor Simon Bowmaker Lecture 7: Economic Organization of Sports Leagues

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, LAW DIVISION

(HELD AT BRAAMFONTEIN) CASE NO: J4373/02

Case 2:03-cv RBS Document 1 Filed 09/04/03 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Player Name:... Address: Street Address:... Suburb:... State:... Postcode:... Contact Details: Home Phone:... Mobile:... Address:...

Marquette Sports Law Review. Zach Leach. Volume 29 Issue 1 Fall. Article 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Hard Cap or Soft Cap: The Optimal Player Mobility Restrictions for the Professional Sports Leagues

Transcription:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Maurice Clarett : : CIVIL ACTION NO.: 03-CV-7441 Plaintiff, : : COMPLAINT v. : JURY TRIAL DEMANDED : National Football League, Inc. : : Defendant. : PARTIES AND JURISDICTION 1. Plaintiff Maurice Clarett ( Clarett ) is an individual with a primary residence in Youngstown, Ohio. 2. Defendant National Football League, Inc. ( defendant or NFL ) is an entity doing business and registered to do business in New York, with an office located at 280 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10017. 3. Jurisdiction is founded upon 28 U.S.C. '1331. Specifically, the federal question arises under the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. '1-3, and the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. '15. 4. Venue is laid in this district pursuant to sections 4, 12 and 16 of the Clayton Act, and15 U.S.C. 1391(b), (c) and (d). 5. The defendant maintains offices, has agents, transacts business, and/or is found within this judicial district. The cause of action alleged herein arose in part within this district. The interstate trade and commerce described herein is and has been carried out within this district.

TRADE AND COMMERCE 6. The activities of the defendant, as described in this Complaint, occurred within interstate commerce; had, and continue to have, a substantial effect on interstate trade and commerce; and have unreasonably restrained, and continue to restrain, interstate trade and commerce. FACTS 7. The defendant, a professional football league, engages in various forms of interstate commerce and is subject to federal antitrust laws. The NFL enjoys a monopoly over professional football in the United States. 8. The NFL is a distinct market for professional football for which there are no reasonable substitutes in the United States. 9. The NFL began operating in 1920 as the American Professional Football Association, an unincorporated association comprised of member clubs which owned and operated professional football teams. 10. At present, the NFL is composed of thirty-two (32) separately incorporated clubs in cities throughout the United States. Representatives of each of the clubs form the NFL Management Committee, which performs various administrative functions such as organizing and scheduling games, and promulgating rules. 11. Until 1968, the NFL s operations were unilaterally controlled by the club owners. 12. In 1968, the NLRB recognized the National Football League Players Association ( NFPLA ) as a labor organization within the meaning of 29 U.S.C. Section 152(5). 2

13. In 1993, the NFL Management Committee and the NFPLA negotiated a Collective Bargaining Agreement ( CBA ), which has been extended three times and will not expire until the 2007 season. 14. The NFL bylaws include a rule prohibiting any player who has not completed three college seasons, or is not three years removed from high school graduation, from joining the NFL ( the Rule ). 15. The CBA, which comprises 292 pages, 61 articles, appendices from A through N, and 357 sections, does not contain the Rule. 16. The Rule is not the product of bona fide arm s length negotiation between the NFL and the NFLPA. 17. The purpose of the Rule is to perpetuate a system whereby college football serves as an efficient and free farm system for the NFL by preventing potential players from selling their services to the NFL until they have completed three college seasons. 18. Clarett was born on October 29, 1983 and graduated high school in December 2001. 19. While in high school, Clarett was a member of his school=s football team. Among the honors he received was selection as the USA Today Offensive Player of the Year after his senior season, as well as being chosen as Mr. Football by the Associated Press. During his high school career, Clarett ran for 4,675 yards and 65 touchdowns. 20. After he graduated from high school, Clarett enrolled in Ohio State University ( OSU ). 3

21. During the 2002-2003 football season, Clarett was a first-year member of the OSU Football Team ( Team ). 22. The Team and Clarett enjoyed complete success during the 2002-2003 football season, winning all fourteen of their games, the Fiesta Bowl, and the undisputed national championship. 23. Clarett rushed for over 1,200 yards and scored 18 touchdowns. Among his honors, Clarett was named to several 2003 preseason All-America teams, voted the No. 1 running back in college football by the Sporting News, named a first-team All-Big Ten pick, and was named Big Ten Freshman of the Year. 24. Clarett was interested in entering the 2003 National Football League Draft ( 2003 Draft ) but was prevented from doing so by the Rule. 25. Representatives of the NFL, including Commissioner Paul Tagliabue, stated publicly that the NFL would not let Clarett enter the 2003 Draft or any draft prior to his senior year at OSU. 26. The NFL is the only major professional sport, unlike baseball, basketball or hockey, which prohibits the drafting of players who have not completed three college seasons or who are not three years removed from high school graduation. 27. As a result of the NFL=s position on this issue, Clarett did not declare himself eligible for the 2003 Draft and re-enrolled at OSU. 28. Clarett is currently enrolled in his second year at Ohio State. 29. Playing football professionally is the only means by which Clarett can profit from his athletic ability. 4

30. There is no other league of professional football that is comparable to the NFL. 31. Had Clarett been eligible for the 2003 Draft, it is almost certain he would have been selected in the beginning of the First Round and would have agreed to a contract and signing bonus worth millions of dollars. COUNT ONE 32. Plaintiff hereby incorporates Paragraphs One through Thirty-One as if each were set forth in full. 33. The Sherman Act declares illegal, among other things, every contract, combination... or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several states. 34. The Rule is a per se violation of the Sherman Act. 35. The Rule is a group boycott and a concerted refusal to deal with individuals such as Clarett. 36. The Rule substantially burdens competition without advancing any important interest of active football players as employees. 37. The restraint the Rule imposes is justified by no legitimate business purpose. 38. The Rule is harmful to competition as it provides for a total exclusion of players who have not completed three college seasons or are not three years removed from high school graduation, notwithstanding their ability to perform in the market and compete for available positions in the league. 39. The Rule is not expressly part of the existing CBA, is not the product of bona fide arms-length negotiation, and is, thus, not subject to the nonstatutory labor exemption to the antitrust laws. 5

40. Moreover, the Rule does not concern wages, hours or other terms and conditions of employment and is not a mandatory subject of collective bargaining within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 151-169). 41. In addition, the direct effect of the Rule is a restraint of amateur athletes who were strangers to the collective bargaining process between the NFL and NFLPA without advancing any important union goal. Thus, the Rule is unlawful. 42. Defendant=s actions constitute concerted conduct and an unreasonable restraint of trade, in violation of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. '1 et seq. and the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. 15. 43. As a direct result of defendant s unlawful conduct, Clarett has suffered substantial loss and damage. WHEREFORE plaintiff Maurice Clarett seeks an Order declaring the Rule unlawful and him eligible for a Supplemental Draft to be held within 10 days from the date of the Order, or eligible for the next year=s draft if a Supplemental Draft is impractical, damages, including lost 6

income as a result of being declared ineligible for the 2003 Draft, treble damages and attorney=s fees as permissible under the Sherman and Clayton Acts, together with interest and costs of suit. SHERMAN, SILVERSTEIN, KOHL, ROSE & PODOLSKY A Professional Corporation Dated: By: Alan C. Milstein (AM2759) Jeffrey P. Resnick (JR4175) Fairway Corporate Center- Suite 311 4300 Haddonfield Road Pennsauken, New Jersey 08109 Phone: (856) 662-0700 Facsimile: (856) 488-4744 John B. Langel Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll, LLP 1735 Market Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103 Phone: (215) 665-8500 Facsimile: (215) 864-8999 Robert A. Skirnick (RS2636) Daniel B. Allanoff Meredith Cohen Greenfogel & Skirnick, One Liberty Plaza 35 th Floor New York, New York 10006 Phone:(212) 240-0020 7

above matter. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the plaintiff demands trial by jury as to all issues in the SHERMAN, SILVERSTEIN, KOHL, ROSE & PODOLSKY A Professional Corporation Dated: By: Alan C. Milstein, Esquire Jeffrey P. Resnick, Esquire Fairway Corporate Center-Suite 311 4300 Haddonfield Road Pennsauken, New Jersey 08109 Phone: (856) 662-0700 Facsimile: (856) 488-4744 Attorneys for Plaintiff Maurice Clarett John B. Langel Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll, LLP 1735 Market Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103 Phone: (215) 665-8500 Facsimile: (215) 864-8999 Robert A. Skirnick (RS2636) Daniel B. Allanoff Meredith Cohen Greenfogel & Skirnick, One Liberty Plaza 35 th Floor New York, New York 10006 Phone:(212) 240-0020 8