Per the Illinois Compiled Statutes, 625 ILCS 5/ Automated Traffic Law Enforcement System:

Similar documents
Per the Illinois Compiled Statutes, 625 ILCS 5/ Automated Traffic Law Enforcement System:

Per the Illinois Compiled Statutes, 625 ILCS 5/ Automated Traffic Law Enforcement System:

Per the Illinois Compiled Statutes, 625 ILCS 5/ Automated Traffic Law Enforcement System:

Per the Illinois Compiled Statutes, 625 ILCS 5/ Automated Traffic Law Enforcement System:

Per the Illinois Compiled Statutes, 625 ILCS 5/ Automated Traffic Law Enforcement System:

Lake Zurich Police Department Traffic Safety Division 200 Mohawk Trail Lake Zurich, IL 60047

LINCOLNWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT

Overview. Updated pictures of the intersection are shown in Exhibits 1 thru 4, and the aerial photo provided by Google Maps is shown in Exhibit 5.

FEASIBILITY REPORT ON RED LIGHT CAMERAS PLACED AT CENTRAL AVENUE AND H STREET.

Executive Summary. Albany Photo Red Light Enforcement Evaluation Page 2

REPORT ON RED-LIGHT MONITORING SYSTEMS

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. North Harrison Street (Lee Highway to Little Falls Road) Comparative Analysis. Prepared for:

Executive Summary. Albany Photo Red Light Enforcement Evaluation Page 2

Analysis of the Red Light Camera Program in Garden Grove, CA By Jay Beeber, Executive Director, Safer Streets L.A., Member ITE

Analysis of Solana Beach Red Light Camera Enforcement Program By Jay Beeber, Executive Director, Safer Streets L.A., Member ITE

Red Light Camera Annual Report 2014

Red-Light Safety Camera Program Analysis

BENNING ROAD & BRIDGES TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS CRASH DATA AND SAFETY ANALYSIS TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM DRAFT MAY 2016

Red Light Camera Increases Safety

METHODOLOGY. Signalized Intersection Average Control Delay (sec/veh)

Analysis of the Red Light Camera Program in Los Alamitos, CA By Jay Beeber, Executive Director, Safer Streets L.A., Member ITE

Evaluation of M-99 (Broad Street) Road Diet and Intersection Operational Investigation

2012 TOWN OF CASTLE ROCK MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT FACTS PREPARED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

Frequently Asked Questions Automated Red Light Enforcement Program Arlington, Texas

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

VILLAGE OF NILES TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY

CITY OF JANESVILLE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE 8 NOVEMBER 2017

South Pasadena, FL Red-Light Safety Camera Program

THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD BAKERSFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT SMILE, YOU RE ON RED LIGHT CAMERA

LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT

Bicycle - Motor Vehicle Collisions on Controlled Access Highways in Arizona

Comparison of Turning Movement Count Data Collection Methods for a Signal Optimization Study. White Paper

Harriet Fraser Traffic Engineering & Transportation Planning

Bicycle Crashes. Number of Bike Crashes. Total Bike Crashes. are down 21% and severe bike crashes down 8% since 2013 (5 years).

IRedwood i. rmmbr 2. Uti. Page 18. August Judge of the Superior Court Hall of Justice 400 County

The total net revenue to the City for the previous four fiscal years was $255,856.

Memorandum. TO: Town of Lysander Comprehensive Plan Update Committee

REPORT ON RED-LIGHT TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL MONITORING SYSTEMS Third Annual Report. Prepared by the New Jersey Department of Transportation

~~i~~pl"i~p ~Ou~t Of,~YD~ib~

Traffic Accident Data Processing

INTRADEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE. The Honorable Board ofpolice Commissioners

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Beaverton Police Department Traffic Safety Team

Effects of Traffic Signal Retiming on Safety. Peter J. Yauch, P.E., PTOE Program Manager, TSM&O Albeck Gerken, Inc.

2016 Annual Report. Work Zone Traffic Control. Bureau of Maintenance and Operations Highway Safety and Traffic Operations Division

City of Elizabeth City Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines

Traffic Safety Study Report City Wide Intersection Study City of Coconut Creek Broward County, Florida

Walking in Traffic Violence. The pervasiveness of motor vehicle crashes with pedestrians in New York City

WEST AVENUE AND NEW ROAD TRAFFIC STUDY PART III WEST AVENUE CLOSURE ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM

Existing Conditions. Date: April 16 th, Dan Holderness; Coralville City Engineer Scott Larson; Coralville Assistant City Engineer

THE VALUE OF CONFIRMATION LIGHTS AND THEIR UNINTENDED IMPACT ON DRIVER COMPLIANCE AND/OR DETERRENCE TO RUN A RED LIGHT

Integrating Safety into the Transportation Decision Making Process

Effectiveness of Red Light Cameras in Chicago: An Exploratory Analysis

Automated Traffic Enforcement Technology Guidelines

SPEED MANAGEMENT FOR VISION ZERO

Appendix A: Before-and-After Crash Analysis of a Section of Apalachee Parkway

VDOT Crash Analysis Procedures for Roadway Safety Assessments

CITY OF OTTAWA ROADWAY MODIFICATION APPROVAL UNDER DELEGATED AUTHORITY

Boston Post Road Design Feasibility Study

the Ministry of Transport is attributed as the source of the material

Marshall Metcalf, P.E. Dan Mlacnik, P.E. Division of Highways/District 6 February 24, 2015

SCHOOL CROSSING PROTECTION CRITERIA

Project Development & Environment (PD&E) Study. November 17, SR 90 (SW 8th Street and SW 7th Street) SW 8 th Street/SW 7 th Street PD&E Study 1

Selected Intersection Crash Analysis for Prepared by: Rita Morocoima-Black Susan Chavarría Lucas Cruse

Scientific Analysis of Road Traffic Accidents. Requirements and Training Needs. Saving Lives through Accident Research

Project Application. Project Location: Salem Drive (Federal Route 1101)

A Novel Approach to Evaluate Pedestrian Safety at Unsignalized Crossings using Trajectory Data

City of Sherwood Photo Red Light Program 2015 Legislative Report. 3/1/2015 City of Sherwood Police Captain Mark Daniel

Safety at Unsignalized Intersections. Unsignalized Intersections

Safety and Active Transport. Dr. Maureen Carew, Medical Officer of Health Renfrew County and District Health Unit May 30, 2014

Use of Throw Distances of Pedestrians and Bicyclists as Part of a Scientific Accident Reconstruction Method 1

DART Bus Crash Analysis. typical scenarios associated with selected crash types

Traffic Calming Policy

Safety Assessment of Installing Traffic Signals at High-Speed Expressway Intersections

Borough of Danville, PA Traffic Calming Program Guidelines

Final Report. Evaluation of Flashing Yellow Right Turn Arrow at Silverbell Rd and Cortaro Rd. FHWA Experimentation #4-329(E)

WELCOME. Stakeholder Involvement Group Meeting #2 Round Lake Public Works October 24, 2018

CITY OF SAINT JOHN TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY

City of Seattle Traffic Safety Camera Pilot Project. Evaluation Report. June 2007 DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT

Swamp Road Residents Study

CITY OF ENCINITAS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: June 26, 2013

Project Report. South Kirkwood Road Traffic Study. Meadows Place, TX October 9, 2015

CARE AND VIGILANCE SAVE LIVES!

San Francisco 2008 Collisions Report December 18, 2009

Review of Considerations and Requirements for Automated Enforcement

Introduction to Highway Safety Course

Crash Patterns in Western Australia. Kidd B., Main Roads Western Australia Willett P., Traffic Research Services

Evaluation of LED-Outlined Backplates at Intersections With Light Rail Lines In Houston, Texas

INNOVATIVE INTERSECTION DESIGN

Injury Mortality in Ireland, Northern Ireland and Britain

At intersections where RLR collisions decreased and rear end collisions increased, there was an overall 95.5% increase in collision severity.

City of Edmonton Office of Traffic Safety

AUTOMATED SPEED ENFORCEMENT: REDUCING SPEED TO SAVE LIVES

HEADWAY AND SAFETY ANALYSIS OF SPEED LAW ENFORCEMENT TECHNIQUES IN HIGHWAY WORK ZONES

Deaths/injuries in motor vehicle crashes per million hours spent travelling, July 2007 June 2011 (All ages) Mode of travel

San Francisco 2009 Collisions Report April 21, 2011

SENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED FEBRUARY 1, 2018

Military Road Safety Improvements

Mission: The mission of FARS is to make vehicle crash information accessible and useful so that traffic safety can be improved

Transcription:

Per the Illinois Compiled Statutes, 625 ILCS 5/11-208.6 Automated Traffic Law Enforcement System: (k-7) A municipality or county operating an automated traffic law enforcement system shall conduct a statistical analysis to assess the safety impact of each automated traffic law enforcement system at an intersection following installation of the system. The statistical analysis shall be based upon the best available crash traffic and other date, and shall cover a period of time before and after installation of the system sufficient to provide a statistically valid comparison of safety impact. The statistical analysis shall be consistent with professional judgment and acceptable industry practice. The statistical analysis also shall be consistent with the data required for valid comparisons of before and after conditions and shall be conducted within a reasonable period following the installation of the automated traffic law enforcement system. The statistical analysis required by this subsection (k-7) shall be made available to the public and shall be published on the website of the municipality or county. If the statistical analysis for the 36-month period following installation of the system indicates that there has been an increase in the rate of accidents at the approach to the intersection monitored by the system, the municipality or county shall undertake additional studies to determine the cause and severity of the accidents, and may take any action that it determines is necessary or appropriate to reduce the number or severity of the accidents at that intersection. A Red Light Running (RLR) Photo Enforcement System was installed at the intersection of IL 83 and Riverside Drive on February 28, 2009, after finding limited success with other attempted measures to promote safer driving and improve compliance with traffic laws. The following statistical analysis was performed through 2015. Calendar year 2016 was not included as the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) has not yet completed collecting all data. The statistical analysis will be updated annually, as collected data becomes available from IDOT. Page 1

IL 83 & Riverside Dr. Villa Park, IL RLR Photo Enforcement System monitors violations occurring on the southbound and eastbound approaches of the intersection RLR Photo Enforcement System installed: February 28, 2009 Page 2

IL 83 & Riverside Dr. - Northbound Approach IL 83 & Riverside Dr. - Southbound Approach Page 3

IL 83 & Riverside Dr. - Eastbound Approach IL 83 & Riverside Dr. - Westbound Approach Page 4

Average Daily Traffic Data was obtained from the Illinois Department of Transportation s website www.gettingaroundillinois.com. IL 83 & Riverside Dr. (Northbound/Southbound) 68,000 (2007) 72,200 (2009) 63,500 (2011) 68,100 (2013) Page 5

Average Daily Traffic Cont d Data was obtained from the Illinois Department of Transportation s website www.gettingaroundillinois.com. IL 83 & Riverside Dr. (Eastbound/Westbound) No historical traffic data available Page 6

Crash History and Analysis Table 1 includes crash data obtained from the Illinois Department of Transportation, detailing angle, turning, rear-end, and other type crashes occurring at the intersection pre/post RLR Photo Enforcement System installation. ALL INTERSECTION APPROACHES Crashes Rear-End (% of Total) Angle (% of Total) Turning (% of Total) Other (% of Total) Total 2006 9 47.4% 1 05.3% 4 21.0% 5 26.3% 19 2007 11 57.9% 0 00.0% 6 31.6% 2 10.5% 19 2008 18 75.0% 0 00.0% 5 20.8% 1 04.2% 24 Total 38 61.3% 1 01.6% 15 24.2% 8 12.9% 62 2006-2008 Average 12.7 0.3 5.0 2.7 20.7 RLR Camera Installation 02/28/09 2009 18 94.7% 0 00.0% 1 05.3% 0 00.0% 19 2010 6 54.5% 0 00.0% 4 36.4% 1 09.1% 11 2011 12 66.7% 0 00.0% 3 16.7% 3 16.7% 18 2012 12 85.7% 0 00.0% 1 07.1% 1 07.1% 14 2013 7 50.0% 2 14.3% 3 21.4% 2 14.3% 14 2014 12 70.6% 0 00.0% 3 17.6% 2 11.8% 17 2015 15 65.2% 1 04.3% 4 17.4% 3 13.0% 23 Total 64 66.0% 3 03.1% 18 18.5% 12 12.4% 97 2010-2015 Average 10.7 0.5 3.0 2.0 16.2 Other indicates the following: Pedestrian, Pedal Cyclist, Fixed Object, Sideswipe, Head-On and Unknown Table 1 DISCLAIMER: The motor vehicle crash data referenced herein was provided by the Illinois Department of Transportation, based upon information derived from multiple sources. Any conclusions drawn from analysis of the aforementioned data are the sole responsibility of the data recipient(s). Additionally, for coding years 2015 to present, the Bureau of Data Collection uses the exact latitude/longitude supplied by the investigating law enforcement agency to locate crashes. Therefore, location data may vary in prior years, since the data prior to 2015 was physically located by bureau personnel. Given the subjective nature of the reporting process, the modifications in the incident locating protocols and the changes to the crash reporting thresholds effective 2009, the Village of Villa Park acknowledges the potential for discrepancies in the final conclusions drawn. Page 7

Crash History and Analysis (continued) Table 2 includes crash data obtained from the Illinois Department of Transportation, detailing angle, turning, rear-end, and other-type crashes occurring at the intersection on the southbound and eastbound approaches only, pre/post RLR Photo Enforcement System installation. SOUTHBOUND & EASTBOUND APPROACHES ONLY (PHOTO ENFORCED APPROACHES) Crashes Rear-End Angle Turning Other (% of Total) Total (% of Total) (% of Total) (% of Total) 2006 6 60.0% 1 10.0% 2 20.0% 1 10.0% 10 2007 9 60.0% 0 00.0% 5 33.3% 1 06.7% 15 2008 7 53.8% 0 00.0% 5 38.5% 1 07.7% 13 Total 22 57.9% 1 02.6% 12 31.6% 3 07.9% 38 2006-2008 Average 7.3 0.3 4.0 1.0 12.7 RLR Camera Installation 02/28/09 2009 9 90.0% 0 00.0% 1 10.0% 0 00.0% 10 2010 1 25.0% 0 00.0% 2 50.0% 1 25.0% 4 2011 5 71.4% 0 00.0% 2 28.6% 0 00.0% 7 2012 8 80.0% 0 00.0% 1 10.0% 1 10.0% 10 2013 3 42.8% 1 14.3% 2 28.6% 1 14.3% 7 2014 4 57.1% 0 00.0% 2 28.6% 1 14.3% 7 2015 9 52.9% 1 05.9% 4 23.5% 3 17.6% 17 Total 30 57.7% 2 03.8% 13 25.0% 7 13.5% 52 2010-2015 Average 5.0 0.3 2.2 1.2 8.7 Other indicates the following: Pedestrian, Pedal Cyclist, Fixed Object, Sideswipe, Head-On and Unknown Table 2 DISCLAIMER: The motor vehicle crash data referenced herein was provided by the Illinois Department of Transportation, based upon information derived from multiple sources. Any conclusions drawn from analysis of the aforementioned data are the sole responsibility of the data recipient(s). Additionally, for coding years 2015 to present, the Bureau of Data Collection uses the exact latitude/longitude supplied by the investigating law enforcement agency to locate crashes. Therefore, location data may vary in prior years, since the data prior to 2015 was physically located by bureau personnel. Given the subjective nature of the reporting process, the modifications in the incident locating protocols and the changes to the crash reporting thresholds effective 2009, the Village of Villa Park acknowledges the potential for discrepancies in the final conclusions drawn. Page 8

Comparison of annual averages shows the total number of crashes decreasing by 22% at the intersection for all approaches and by 31% on the southbound and eastbound (photo enforced) approaches post-camera installation. The US Department of Transportation Project Development and Design Manual states that turning, angle or head-on crashes have a number of probable crash causes, to include: Large volumes of left /right turns Large total intersection volume Excessive speed on approaches Inadequate traffic control devices Poor visibility of signals While red light cameras cannot truly decrease the volume of cars entering the intersection, speed and proximity of vehicles entering an intersection or the amount of turning traffic volume, red light cameras and red light camera photo enforcement warning signs have the ability to reduce traffic crashes and improve compliance with traffic control devices. Page 9

Adjudication Experience RLR camera violations are contested and adjudicated through an administrative hearing conducted each month. Adjudication data for the Village s Automated Enforcement Program is shown below in Table 3. VILLAGE OF VILLA PARK ADJUDICATION FOR AUTOMATED PHOTO ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM* YEAR /TOTALS LIABLE NOT LIABLE 2009 1,203 26 2010 730 41 2011 499 39 2012 460 59 2013 633 35 2014 307 29 2015 507 60 2016 458 51 2017** 159 16 TOTAL: 4,956 356 *Adjudication totals include contested violations for entire program (all RLR cameras). **2017 totals through April 2017. Table 3 The high quality video footage and photographic evidence produced by the enforcement system is a contributing factor in a majority of the contested RLR violations being upheld by the Hearing Officer. The police officers assigned to review and approve/reject potential violations are vigilant in applying the same officer discretion and criteria they would if issuing an in-person citation, resulting in only highly prosecutable violations being mailed out. Page 10