Managing Encounters Between Humans and Coyotes. Guidelines and Information

Similar documents
COYOTE MANAGEMENT PLAN. Purpose

Town of Mount Pleasant Coyote Management Plan

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CASTLE PINES NORTH APPROVING A COYOTE MANAGEMENT PLAN

City of Isle of Palms, SC Coyote Management Plan

Hazing Guidelines Colorado Division of Wildlife (CDOW), Area 5 For distribution to local government agencies

Town of New Castle. DRAFT Coyote Response Plan

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE FIELD STAFF RESPONSE FOR COUGAR INFORMATION AND CONFLICT SITUATIONS

CITY COUNCIL MEETING. Urban Coyote Management Workshop CITY OF TORRANCE TUESDAY, JUNE 14, 2016

Minnetonka Coyote Management. Hazing Works If We Do It Together

Living With Your Wild(er) Neighbors. Kristin Cannon, District Wildlife Manager-Boulder North

City of Fountain Valley COYOTE MANAGEMENT PLAN

Coyote Canis latrans

Coyote Exclusions, Deterrents and Repellents Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW), Area 5

Coexisting in Coyote Country

FACT SHEET Ministry of Natural Resources

Coexisting in Coyote Country

CITY OF GLENDALE 5909 North Milwaukee River Parkway Glendale, Wisconsin AGENDA COYOTE ACTION PLAN AD-HOC COMMITTEE MEETING

Beausoleil First Nation Eleven O-Gemaa Miikaan Christian Island, ON L9M 0A Fax:

Black Bear Response Guide

Living With Alligators. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, the feeding of wildlife can lead to negative impacts on animals, people and the environment; and

City and County of Broomfield

Coyotes in the City. Presentation Date: April 3 rd 2012

City of Atlantic Beach Coyote Management and Education Plan

Coyotes: Wild and free on the urban interface. Dana Sanchez Extension Wildlife Specialist

A TEMPLATE COYOTE MANAGEMENT & COEXISTENCE PLAN. Prepared by The Humane Society of the United States

March , 7:00 p.m. 8:30 p.m. Central Arena 519 Drury Lane Burlington, Ontario 9/14/2015

Coyote Management and Co-Existence Educational Materials

RULES AND REGULATIONS

Mayor Cooper, Deputy Mayor Saunderson and Councillors. Coyote Management Threat Assessment / Options

PLEASE DON T FEED THE WILDLIFE

Wildlife Hazard Mitigation Policy, Plan and Procedure. May

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SUMMARY OF COUGAR MANAGEMENT IN NEIGHBORING STATES

City of Geneva. Coyote Management Plan

17425 BALLINGER WAY NE LAKE FOREST PARK, WA

Florida Black Bears Ursus americanus floridanus. MyFWC

City of Wauwatosa Coyote Nuisance Management and Response Plan Policy

AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER

Jeffrey Cole, Wildlife Manager Fish and Wildlife Dispatch

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ON RESIDENT CANADA GOOSE MANAGEMENT Questions and Answers

Living with White-Tailed Deer. A Homeowner s Guide

Invasive Species. 1. What do you think might happen if a species is moved out of its native habitat and into a new environment?

2. Time Critical: Yes hunting proponents have requesting the matter be brought before Council.

Coyotes (Canis latrans) in Florida

Norwegian legislation is a violation of Article 9, point 1 of the Bern Convention

Predators & Policies. Overview

Citizen 1 Information regarding appropriate contacts (CDOW and Broomfield Wildlife Masters) was provided via .

Management of Canada Geese

Township of Muskoka Lakes Bear Hazard Assessment January 2006

Salida Urban Deer Task Force Recommendations

Governor Bill Richardson Orders Temporary Trapping Ban to Protect the Mexican Gray Wolf

SOME COUGAR ADVICE (Source: Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife)

WildSafeBC Elk Valley and South Country Annual Report Including: Elkford, Sparwood and the surrounding rural Elk Valley and South Country

The Conservation Agency

The Good, The Bad, and The Hungry:

BE BEAR SMART. Protect Yourself Protect our Wildlife

Veronica Yovovich, Ph.D. Wildlife Conflict Specialist and Science Program Director Mountain Lion Foundation

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

Coyotes. The Coyote Food and Feeding Habits. Den Sites. Reproduction and Family Structure

PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY ISSUES

Wildlife in the Urban Interface. Jeff Schalau Agent, Agriculture & Natural Resources University of Arizona Cooperative Extension, Yavapai County

COYOTES. Co-existing with. AFEW YEARS AGO, a coyote found its way into my home town of Fort Erie south of the

Polar Bear Interaction Plan

Challenges of Florida Panther Conservation. Presented by: Darrell Land, Florida Panther Team Leader

Coyotes (Canis latrans) in Florida: the Good, the Bad, & the Ugly

Avoiding Conflicts with Wildlife in the City

Non-Lethal Deterrents Grant Application Additional Site Form

Controlled Take (Special Status Game Mammal Chapter)

ACTIVITY FIVE SPECIES AT RISK LEARNING OBJECTIVES: MATERIALS: Subjects: Science, math, art, history

Who is Out at Night in the Kuse Nature Preserve, a Nearby Woods or Maybe in Your Backyard?

MISSISSIPPI COMMISSION ON WILDLIFE, FISHERIES, AND PARKS MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE, FISHERIES, AND PARKS

Province of Alberta Rat Control Plan

WildSafeBC Year End Report 2015 Kaslo and Area

Florida House of Representatives Representative Doug Broxson District 3

CHEETAH PROJECT Cheetah Conservation Fund. Interviewers name Date

2016 Bear and Cougar Activity in Mountain View County

Managing Vertebrate Pests

CHAPTER W-13 - POSSESSION OF WILDLIFE, SCIENTIFIC COLLECTING AND SPECIAL LICENSES INDEX #1300 DEFINITIONS 1 #1301 POSSESSION 1

Humane State Ranking 2014 (Montana through Wyoming, plus DC and PR)

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

The History of a Central Texas Feral Hog Management Program

WRITTEN BY KATHERINE PYLES

MILWAUKEE POLICE DEPARTMENT

2015 Bear and Cougar Activity in Mountain View County

GRIZZLY BEAR MANAGEMENT CAPTURES, RELOCATIONS, AND REMOVALS IN NORTHWEST WYOMING

DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE Law Enforcement Division 6980 Sierra Center Parkway, Ste 120 Reno, Nevada (775) Fax (775)

Youth Cow Elk and Doe Deer Hunts at Burns Hole -Ranching for Wildlife-

Humane State Ranking 2016 (Montana through Wyoming)

Hunting Dog Training Rules Revision

RULE-MAKING NOTICE PARKS AND WILDLIFE COMMISSION MEETING November 16-17, 2017

TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE. Interacting with Urban Texas Wildlife

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PENTICTON COUNCIL REPORT. DATE: 9 th January 2012 RES:

OREGON ADMINISTRATIVE RULES OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE DIVISION 046

IC Chapter 34. Nongame and Endangered Species Conservation

Rule 1.1 BASIC REGULATIONS FOR ALL WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREAS (WMAs). 1. Target shooting is prohibited, except on designated ranges.

Comment Letter 1 for Item 5

H. R. To provide for the protection of the last remaining herd of wild and genetically pure American Buffalo. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES A BILL

CITY OF VISTA TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM

FORT CLARK SPRINGS ASSOCIATION, INC. 2017/2018 HUNTING RULES & GUIDELINES. I am a member of Fort Clark Springs Association (Please check if yes).

Subject: Human/Wildlife Interactions in California: Mountain Lion Depredation, Public Safety, and Animal Welfare

Transcription:

Managing Encounters Between Humans and Coyotes Guidelines and Information

PURPOSE The Highlands Ranch Metro District manages a parks and open space system with more than 2,500 acres of land. These areas provide habitat and food source which attract coyotes to our community. With 5,000 residential properties adjacent to the open space and nearly 1.5 million visitor days, it is not uncommon for individuals to spot a coyote behind their back fence or along the trail they may be walking. Coyotes are our neighbors in Highlands Ranch. The Metro District supports coexistence of people and coyotes. This document provides strategies to reduce encounters between humans and coyotes in our community. The role of home owners, pet owners and the Metro District are outlined in the chart below. Situations where other management techniques may be required, including immediate lethal control, are also addressed. RESPONSIBILITY Highlands Ranch Metro District The Metro District is responsible for education, monitoring and reporting. As the parks and open space land owner, local government and responsible steward of public safety and resources, it s the Metro District s role to provide information to citizens about potential encounters between humans and coyotes. In addition, the Metro District monitors encounters, documents them and reports them to the appropriate agencies. Information gathered by the Metro District is provided to the Douglas County Sheriff s Office, Animal Control and Colorado Wildlife. Colorado Wildlife (C W) - The C W provides guidance and education to landowners, Metro District staff and Douglas County officials on managing nuisance coyotes. C W personnel respond to reports of dangerous coyotes and decide how to handle each situation based on the interest of public safety. Douglas County Sheriff s Office (DCSO) - DCSO will notify C W of a reported coyote conflict. Although they may be a first responder to a coyote incident, DCSO will turn over the incident to C W for investigation and action once they arrive. DEFINITIONS OF COYOTE INTERACTIONS Coyotes are highly adaptive members of the dog family and have demonstrated an ability to survive in urbanized environments. Unless habituated to humans, coyotes are generally shy and wary, and do not normally present a threat to humans. The following are definitions of human/coyote interactions offered by the C W. Observation - Noticing tracks, scat or vocalizations of coyotes in an area. Sighting - A visual observation of a coyote. Encounter - An unexpected direct meeting between a human and a coyote without incident. A coyote may be in close proximity to a human but does not create an unsafe situation. Incident - A conflict between a human and a coyote where a coyote exhibits behavior creating an unsafe situation. A coyote may show aggression towards a human without any physical contact. Most attacks on pets fall within this definition.

Attack A direct, aggressive physical contact with a human by a coyote. DEFINING AND ASSESSING COYOTE BEHAVIOR The following are common concerns regarding coyote behavior that are often expressed by citizens, and effective strategies that homeowners can implement to reduce conflicts with coyotes. One common strategy referred to in the chart is hazing. Hazing is an activity or series of activities designed to change a coyote s behavior. Conflict Discussion Home Owner/Pet Owner Action Predation on free roaming domestic cats Predation on unattended or unleashed dogs When domestic cats roam freely in open space areas they become part of the natural food chain. They may be preying on mice and songbirds and in turn may be preyed upon by coyotes. This is a part of the natural food chain. It is normal behavior for coyotes to prey on domestic dogs roaming free in the open space or in your backyard. Keep cats inside or in enclosed cat runs. Keep dogs leashed on a six-foot long or shorter leash at all times in parks and open space areas. Predation on leashed dogs Coyotes observed in private yards Dogs left to run free in open space areas may be seen as competition or a threat to coyotes and may prompt them to become territorial. It is not normal behavior for a coyote to attack a dog on a short (six-foot long) leash. Dogs on a long leash (15-20 feet) may cause too much separation between owner and pet. Coyotes may not perceive the pet-owner relationship in this circumstance. Presence of a coyote in a private yard is cause for concern if the animal displays aggressive behavior or approaches humans. Coyotes should not feel comfortable around people and should be discouraged from private yards. Attend to pets while they are outside or pen them in an enclosed dog run. Use pet doors that can be opened and closed to ensure pets are supervised when outdoors and to keep coyotes from entering your home through the pet door. Keep dogs leashed on a six-foot long or shorter leash at all times in parks and open space areas. Leashes that extend 15 feet or more should not be used to walk pets. Yell, clap and throw rocks at the coyote to make it feel unwelcome and fearful of humans. Notify the Metro District at 303-540- 2311. Do not intentionally feed wildlife. Remove coyote attractants from your yard. This may include: Accessible garbage cans or compost Fruit that has fallen from trees

Conflict Discussion Home Owner/Pet Owner Action Coyotes observed in private yards, cont. Rodent habitat such as tall grass, low shrubs, or rock outcropping that allow rodents to seek cover Accessible outdoor pet food Low brush that may shelter coyotes Bird feeders and seed Sources of water Coyotes observed in parks, natural areas and trails Coyote dens Coyotes are likely present in many parks and natural areas even if not frequently seen. Aggressive behavior by coyotes may be tied to protection of nearby dens. Coyotes raising young may be more prone to predation and harassment on off-leash pets. Other things to consider: Install motion sensing lights Use coyote exclusions, deterrents and repellents Spray with a garden hose Yell, clap or throw rocks at coyotes Unless coyotes are approaching people or acting aggressively towards humans, they should be left alone. If a coyote displays aggressive behavior toward a leashed dog, pet owner should: Yell, clap and throw rocks at it Remove their leashed pet from the area Notify Metro District park rangers at 303-540-2311 In some instances the Metro District may initiate activities to change the behaviors of habituated coyotes and curtail unacceptable coyote behavior. Activities may include: Using pepper spray or other irritant sprays against coyotes Blaring sound producing devices such as an air horn Shooting at coyotes with slingshots, paintball guns or bean bag rounds with an intent to scare and not harm it PUBLIC EDUCATION AND OUTREACH Education and outreach is important for people to coexist with coyotes. Informed residents make better decisions about maintaining their property and keeping themselves and their pets safe. They understand coyote behavior which in turn decreases unreasonable fears of coyotes. Understanding normal coyote behavior is instrumental in the community playing an important role in reshaping undesired coyote behaviors. The Metro District outreach program includes one-on-one visits with homeowners, signage, online resources, and educational programs. Metro District park rangers can conduct a coyote conflict prevention home audit with homeowners. By reviewing the home audit checklist, homeowners evaluate items in their yards that may be attracting coyotes to their property.

and Plant Health Inspection Service for lethal control of coyotes on Metro District property. If a coyote is deemed to be aggressive by CPW, it will be destroyed with lethal control (shooting) by a skilled and authorized peace officer. Lethal coyote control can be effective in eliminating individual animals that are dangerous and/or pose a human health risk. Lethal control is not an effective strategy to eliminate or control local coyote populations. After the incident or attack has been addressed, the Metro District will implement animal control strategies coupled with education outreach to eliminate human and animal behaviors likely to lead to a reoccurrence of the problem. Coyotes will almost certainly return to the area; whether coyote problems return as well will depend on whether causes are addressed at the source. Private Property Homeowners may use lawful methods on their property to control nuisance wildlife. Contact Colorado Parks and Wildlife or Douglas County Sherriff s Office for information pertaining to controlling nuisance wildlife on private property. Citizens, parks and open space visitors and adjacent property owners are prohibited from attempting to control wildlife on public property. AUTHORITY A. Colorado Revised Statute 33-1-106 gives the Wildlife Commission the authority to regulate the circumstances under which wildlife may be taken, and to determine the disposition of usable portions of wildlife. B. Colorado Revised Statute 33-1-105(1)(h) gives the Wildlife Commission the authority to provide for destruction of any wildlife that poses a threat to public health, safety, or welfare. C. Colorado Revised Statute 33-6-107(9) permits any person, any member of such person s family, or any employee of the person to hunt, trap, or take coyotes on land owned or leased by the person without securing licenses to do so, but only when such wildlife is causing damage to crops, real or personal property, or livestock. D. Wildlife Commission Regulation 303 (A) prohibits the relocation of coyotes without a permit. Studies have shown that relocation is not an effective solution to coyote conflicts. CPW generally will not authorize the relocation of coyotes. E. Colorado Revised Statute 33-6-205 gives federal, state, county or municipal departments of health the ability to grant an exemption to Amendment 14 to take (by use of leg hold traps, snares, instant kill body-gripping design traps or poisons) wildlife for the purpose of protecting human health and safety.