GEO TECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT

Similar documents
REPORT GEO-TECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR THE PROPOSED BLOCK-7 SUB-STATION SY NO-225, NEAR RAYACHERLU VILLAGE

REPORT GEO-TECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR THE PROPOSED BLOCK-1 SUB-STATION SY NO-44, NEAR KYATAGANACHERLU VILLAGE

UNIT-I SOIL EXPLORATION


A REPORT ON SUB SOIL INVESTIGATION WORK NEW HAJ TOWER COMPLEX HOOGHLY RIVER BRIDGE COMMISSIONERS

FINAL REPORT ON: GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATORY TRAINING INSTITUTE AT NIMLI VILLAGE, TIJARA ALWAR, RAJASTHAN.

CENGRS GEOTECHNICA PVT. LTD. Job No Sheet No. 1

INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING (Autonomous) Dundigal, Hyderabad

INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING (Autonomous) Dundigal, Hyderabad CIVIL ENGINEERING TUTORIAL QUESTION BANK

m v = 1.04 x 10-4 m 2 /kn, C v = 1.29 x 10-2 cm 2 /min

Reinforced Soil Retaining Walls-Design and Construction

SCHEDULE OF RATES FOR GEO-TECHNICAL INVESTIGATION WORKS FOR FAGMIL GRANULATED SINGLE SUPER PHOSPHATE PLANT AT CHITTORGARH, RAJASTHAN

CONE PENETRATION TESTS

SUPPORTING NOTES FOR THE EVALUATION OF UNBOUND ROAD BASE AND SUB-BASE AGGREGATES

Item 404 Driving Piling

Geotechnical Engineering Laboratory CIVIL ENGINEERING VIRTUAL LABORATORY Experiment no 8 Standard Penetration Test

EXPERIMENTS IN GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING. Smt. S. R. PATEL ENGINEERING COLLEGE Dabhi, unjha Department of CIVIL engineering

Bearing Capacity and Settlement Response of PMS Tanks on Cohesionless Soil Lithology in Lekki, Lagos of Nigeria

PUSH PIER SYSTEMS STABILITY. SECURITY. INTEGRITY. Push Pier Systems PN #MBPPT

Influence of Settlement on Bearing Capacity Analysis of Shallow Foundations on Sandy Clays in the Niger Delta, Nigeria

CIVE 554/650. Geotechnical Engineering. Rock. Soil. Water. Site Investigation Techniques. CIVE Knight 1. 1/8/2006 CIVE Knight 1

Typical factors of safety for bearing capacity calculation in different situations

Formation level = m. Foundation level = m. Height of the wall above the Ground Level = 7.42 m

1 CHAPTER 1. Standard Penetration Test: Corrections and Correlations. 1.1 General. 1.2 Standard Penetration Test (SPT)

INFLUENCE OF FLY ASH IN STRENGTH CHARACTERISTICS OF COHESIVE SOILS

Copyright ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA , United States.

Construction Dewatering

Downloaded from Downloaded from /1

Influence of Fly Ash Content on Compaction Characteristics of Fly Ash Clay Mixture

TYPES OF FOUNDATION. Superstructure. Substructure. Foundation

SOIL ANCHORS ETSAB/UPC J.Llorens - ETSAB/UPC PASSIVE ANCHORS - ANTECEDENTS

3. Types of foundation

Sample Project with EPB TBM according to DIN 4085

1) INTRODUCTION 2) THE UNFAIR ADVANTAGE

Soil Stabilization using Fly Ash and Rice Husk Ash

OP CHECKLIST FOR 1D CONSOLIDATION LABORATORY TEST

SUMMARY OF SUBSURFACE STRATIGRAPHY AND MATERIAL PROPERTIES

The following notes supersede the related tender clauses and also become the part of tender document.

h o l l o w poles for foundat i o n s

Introduction of world construction methods and trends. Franz-Werner Gerressen, Head of Method Development, Tokyo,

Inflatable Packer Single & Double. Single & Double Packer Dimension. Wireline Packer. Water Testing Packer (WTP) Packer

SPECIFICATION FOR REPEATED LOAD TRIAXIAL (RLT) TESTING FOR PAVEMENT MATERIALS

LEVELTON CONSULTANTS LTD Clarke Place Richmond, BC V6V 2H9 T: F:

h o l l o w poles for foundat i o n s

An Introduction to Deep Foundations

Lecture 8&9: Construction Dewatering

Dynamic Cone Penetrometer SL970. Impact Test Equipment Ltd & User Guide. User Guide

Department of Civil & Geological Engineering GEOE Engineering Geology

Soils for civil engineering purposes

Theory of a vertically loaded Suction Pile in CLAY

SOIL IMPROVEMENT BY VACUUM PRELOADING FOR A POWER PLANT PROJECT IN VIETNAM

Pressuremeters in Geotechnical Design

Mechanical Stabilisation for Permanent Roads

Homework 2 PROBLEM No. 1

Stabilization of Black Cotton Soil using Alkali Activated Fly Ash

GROUND IMPROVEMENT USING RAPID IMPACT COMPACTION

Field Instruction. This instruction applies to Horizon Power employees and contractors involved in Horizon Power s underground projects.

Design Data 22M. Flotation of Circular Concrete Pipe. w w I = w - x 1000 (3) (SG x 1000)

Prof. B V S Viswanadham, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

Desaturating sand deposit by air injection for reducing liquefaction potential

Field Instruction. This instruction applies to Horizon Power employees and contractors involved in Horizon Power s underground projects.

For a cantilever pile wall shown in Figure 1, assess the performance of the system and answer the following questions.

DIRECTIONAL DRILLING

Risk Assessment and Mitigating Measures Regarding Pile Installation at EBS Biohub Jetty

TZ WEDGE ANCHOR FOR CRACKED AND UNCRACKED CONCRETE

Behavior of Square Footing Resting on Reinforced Sand Subjected to Static Load

P Oskarshamn site investigation. Borehole: KAV01 Results of tilt testing. Panayiotis Chryssanthakis Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, Oslo

IN-PLACE DENSITY OF BITUMINOUS MIXES USING THE NUCLEAR MOISTURE-DENSITY GAUGE FOP FOR WAQTC TM 8

METHOD 2E - DETERMINATION OF LANDFILL GAS PRODUCTION FLOW RATE. NOTE: This method does not include all of the

FP McCann Tunnels and Shafts 1

Stability of Pipeline and details of Anchor blocks

Sept 23, 2014 LAB MANUAL

Ground Failure Mechanism of Micoropiled-raft

DEVELOPMENT OF A ROBUST PUSH-IN PRESSUREMETER

Density of Granular Material by Modified Sand-Cone Method for Thin Layers

for Prepared for: Mr. Greg Hartz Tompkins Trust Company 121 East Seneca Street Ithaca, NY 14850

HCMTCB MATERIALS SAMPLING & TESTING PERFORMANCE CHECKLIST

Fehmarnbelt Fixed Link. Geotechnical Large Scale Testing

SITE S7: EMBANKMENT FAILURE WEST OF MILLARVILLE

WEDGE-ALL Wedge Anchors

A Slipway Structure for River Ship Repair

EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION ON OPTIMUM INSTALLATION DEPTH OF PVD UNDER VACUUM CONSOLIDATION ABSTRACT

Displacement-based calculation method on soil-pile interaction of PHC pipe-piles

Ground control for slurry TBM tunnelling GEO Report 249

Turfgrass and Environmental Research Online

CHAPTER 5: VACUUM TEST WITH VERTICAL DRAINS

Standard Test Procedures Manual

THE EFFECT OF EMBEDMENT DEPTH ON BEARING CAPACITY OF STRIP FOOTING IN COHESIVE FRICTIONAL MEDIUM

DESIGN OF BELL-MOUTH SPILLWAY AT BARVI DAM

Analysis of dilatometer test in calibration chamber

Licensed Copy: Puan Ms. Norhayati, Petroliam Nasional Berhad, 12 March 2003, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) BSI

ASIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING (BUILDING AND HOUSING) VOL. 9, NO. 5 (2008) PAGES

DESIGN OF AXIALLY LOADED STEPPED FOOTING DATA :- SBC of soil =200 KN /m 2 Concrete Mix =M20 Steel Grade = Fe 415 Clear cover of bottom slab =50 mm

RECYCLED AGGREGATES FOR MINOR SCHEMES (RAMS)

APPENDIX G SCA BASIN CALCULATIONS

SOFRASAR TUNNEL PRODUCTS CONNECTING ALL COMPONENTS

Irrigation &Hydraulics Department lb / ft to kg/lit.

Homework of chapter (3)

l DESCRIPTION l FEATURES l LIMITATIONS l TYPICAL APPLICATIONS l MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS TECHNICAL MANUAL SECTION 2.3 PAGE 1 / 6

Method of Test for Sieve Analysis

Transcription:

GEO TECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT Project: Soil Investigation for Proposed Multi Modal Logistic Hub at Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh Client: M/s Balmer lawrie & Co. Ltd., Kolkata-700001 -Prepared by GEO TECHNOLOGIES ISO 9001:2008 Company # 5-83/ B, V.V Nagar Street No 8, Habsiguda Hyderabad-500 007 Tel: 42217757, Cell: 9347275255 E-mail: geotech999@gmail.com Website: www.geotechnologies.co.in GT / 0866 / 2014-15

GEO TECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT REPORT No.: GT /0866/2014-15 PROJECT: Soil Investigation for proposed Multi Modal Logistic Hub at Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh. CLIENT: M/s, Kolkata-700001 W. O. No.: BL/NI/MMLH/Vizag/WO-001 dated: 22-05-2014 Completion Date: 30 June 2014 GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS: GEO TECHNOLOGIES ISO 9001:2008 COMPANY # 5-83/B, V. V. NAGAR HABSIGUDA, STREET No. 8 HYDERABAD - 500 007 Tele/Fax: 040 42217757; M: 9347275255 Email: geotech999@gmail.com Website: www.geotechnologies.co.in 1

CONTENTS S.NO. TITLE PAGE 1. INTRODUCTION 3 2. FIELD INVESTIGATIONS 4 6 3. LABORATORY TESTING 7 4. ANALYSIS OF DATA & RESULTS 8 5. SUB-SOIL PROFILE 9 6. RECOMMENDATIONS 10 18 7. TABLE 1: Summary of Drilling 19 8. TABLE 2 (a)-(c): Summary of results of Laboratory tests of soil 20 23 9: TABLE 3: Results of laboratory tests on rock samples 24 10. TABLE 4 (a-b): Results of Chemical Tests of soil and water 24 11. TABLE 5 (a-b): Results of Field and Lab CBR Tests 25 12. TABLE 6 (a-d): Results of DCPT Tests 26 13. APPENDIX-1: Calculations for SBC for Open foundations 27 28 14. APPENDIX-2: Calculations for Pile Capaciy 29 30 15 APPENDIX-3: Boundary wall foundations 31 16. FIG 1: Site Plan showing locations of Bore Holes, CBR and DCPT 17. FIG 2: Combined Log of Bore holes 19. Annexure-1: Field Bore Log charts 20. Annexure-2: BIS Codes 2

1. INTRODUCTION The work of soil investigation for the proposed Multi Modal Logistic Hub project at VPT, Visakhapatnam, was assigned to M/s GEO TECHNOLOGIES, vide Work Order No. BL/NI/MMLH/Vizag/Wo-001 dated: 22-05-2014 from M/s, Kolkata. Geotechnical investigations were carried out by drilling Nine (09) bore holes, conducting Standard Penetration Tests, collecting soil and rock samples and conducting relevant laboratory tests. California Bearing Ratio (CBR) tests and Dynamic Cone Penetration Tests (DCPT) were also conducted. Fig.1. gives the Site Plan of the proposed development, showing the locations of bore holes, California Bearing Ratio (CBR) tests and Dynamic Cone Penetration Tests (DCPT). The aim of investigations is to determine the depth of foundations and the Safe Bearing Capacity based on Field and Laboratory Investigations. All the investigations are carried out in accordance with the relevant BIS (IS) Codes. 3

2. FIELD INVESTIGATIONS OBJECTIVE: The sub soil investigation was carried out to determine the nature of stratum and engineering properties of soil which may affect the mode of construction of the proposed structures, and to recommend the SBC of foundations accordingly. BORE HOLES: Nine (09) bore holes (BH-1 to BH-9) were drilled at the locations fixed by the client (Fig.1). Table-1 gives the details of the bore holes drilled. The bore holes were planned so as to yield complete information in the effective and critical zones under the foundations. DRILLING: Rotary Drilling was performed as per IS: 1892. The size of the casing used was 125 to 75 mm yielding samples of NX size. The following information was collected during the drilling operations: Depth-wise soil profile Depth and results of SPT Details of soil and rock samples collected Core recovery & RQD of rock Color of return water 4

STANDARD PENETRATION TEST (SPT): Standard Penetration Tests were conducted at frequent intervals in the bore holes. These tests were performed as specified in IS: 2131-1981. In this test, a standard weight is dropped through 75 cm height to drive the split-spoon sampler, and the number of blows required to effect three consecutive 15 cm penetrations is recorded. The first 15 cm penetration is considered as seating drive and neglected. Thereafter, the split-spoon sampler is further driven for 30 cm penetration or 100 blows, whichever is reached earlier. The total number of blows for the second and third 15 cm penetrations is designated as penetration resistance N. If less than 30 cm is penetrated, the number of blows and the depth penetrated are recorded, and N value is recoded as N > 100. If the number of blows exceeds 100, Refusal is said to have been reached and further testing is discontinued. FIELD BORE LOGS: All the details collected from the field operations are presented in Logs of Bore holes given in Annexure-1. These logs contain depth wise strata details, sample collection data, results of Standard Penetration Tests, core recovery data, and colour of return water etc. SAMPLES: All the samples collected were properly packed, labeled and transported to Geo Technologies Soil Testing Laboratory at Hyderabad. CBR TESTS : The CBR tests (CBR-1 to CBR-3) were conducted at three (3) locations shown in the site plan (Fig.1), at a depth of 30 cm. The tests were conducted in accordance with IS: 2720 (Part-31): 1969 Field Determination of California Bearing Ratio. The equipment comprises mechanical loading jack of 10 ton capacity, with bracket and swivel head. A bridge support is provided for a calibrated proving ring of capacity 5000 kg, with a dial gauge to read to an accuracy of 0.002 mm. A 50-mm dia metal penetration piston 5

is used for penetration. A dial gauge held in a universal dial gauge clamp, supported by datum bar is used for measuring the penetration. One 5-kg, 250-mm dia annular metal weight, with a 53-mm dia central hole and two circular slotted weights of 5 kg & two circular slotted weights of 10 kg are used as surcharge weights. Equipment to provide reaction (truss, truck) are located such that the beam is over the centre of the surface under test. The load is applied at the rate of 1.25 mm / min. Load readings are recorded for penetrations of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 7.5, 10.0 & 12.5 mm. Each test was conducted with three trials (at 3 adjacent points) in unsoaked and soaked conditions. Soil samples were also collected from the test locations for laboratory CBR tests. DCPT TESTS : Dynamic Cone Penetration tests were conducted at four locations as per IS Code: 4968 (Part-1): 1976 Method for Subsurface Sounding for Soils: Part 1: Dynamic Method using 50 mm Cone without Bentonite slurry. A 50 mmm dia, 60 cone screwed to the driving rod and hammer assembly was used for the test. This assembly is kept vertical with the cone resting on the ground to be tested. The cone is then driven into the soil by allowing a 65 kg hammer to fall freely through a height of 750 mm each time. The number of blows per every 100 mm penetration of the cone is noted. The process is repeated for three consecutive 100 mm penetration and the sum of number of blows is recorded as DCPT value (Ncd). When the Ncd value reaches 100, it is treated as refusal and driving is stopped. 6

3. LABORATORY TESTING The samples were tested at the Soil Testing Laboratory of GEO TECHNOLOGIES at Hyderabad. The following tests were performed on the Soil samples: Natural Moisture Content Atterberg s Limits (Liquid Limit & Plastic Limit) Bulk density & dry Density Specific gravity Particle size distribution (a) Sieve (b) Hydrometer Triaxial Shear / Direct Shear Consolidation Test Lab CBR Test (Unsoaked & Soaked) Chemical Analysis for ph, Sulphate & Chloride on soil / water All the tests were conducted in accordance with IS: 2720 (Methods of Tests for Soils). The following tests were conducted on rock samples: Unit weight of rock (Density) Water Absorption Porosity Uniaxial Crushing Strength These tests were conducted in accordance with IS: 1124 1974 and IS: 9143 1979. 7

4. ANALYSIS OF DATA & RESULTS BORE HOLE DATA: From the field observation charts, sub-soil profiles, showing the variation of soil strata with depth and SPT (N) values, are drawn for all the 9 bore holes. Fig. 2 gives the Combined Log of the 9 bore holes. Based on the results of lab tests, physical and engineering properties of soil and rock samples are tabulated. Tables 2(a) to 2(c) give the results of lab testing of soil samples. Table 3 gives the results of testing of rock samples. Tables 4(a) & 4(b) give the results of chemical tests on soil and water samples. ANALYSIS OF CBR DATA: CBR test data is analyzed for calculating CBR value as per IS Code: 2720 (Part 31): 1969, Clause 5. From the stress-penetration curves, the stress values corresponding to 2.5 mm and 5.0 mm penetrations are read, and the California Bearing Ratio is calculated as: CBR = (PT / PS) x 100, Where PT = Test stress value corresponding to the chosen penetration value, and PS = Standard stress for the same penetration value, taken from Table-1 of the Code (PS (2.5 mm) = 70 kg/cm 2 ; PS (5 mm) = 105 kg/cm 2 ). Tables 5 (a) & 5(b) give the results of Field and Lab CBR Tests. ANALYSIS OF DCPT DATA: The results Dynamic Cone Penetration Tests are presented as Ncd value versus depth. Table 6 gives DCPT results for four locations. DCPT (Ncd) values are, by and large, correlatable with SPT values at the corresponding depths in the nearby borehole data. 8

5. SUB-SOIL PROFILE Based on Nine (09) bore logs, the generalized subsoil profile at the site is as follows: Depth, m Strata N Value 0.00 7.00 Clay / Silty clay / silty sand 2 7 7.00 9.00 Clayey / Silty gravel 12 45 9.00 14.00 / Soft Disintegrated Rock (SDR) 38 100 Below 14.00 Refusal strata / Rock > 100 & Cores Thickness of the top soil layer varies from 3.5 m to 9.5 m in different bore holes, with an average of about 7 m. This layer consists of clay, silty clay and silty sand. N values in this layer are very low (2 to 7). These soils are soft and weak. It should be noted that filled-up soil exists only in the area of BH-7. Thickness of filling in the borehole is 4.3 m. The top soil is followed by clayey gravel / silty gravel to a depth of 6.0 12.0 m, with N values varying over a wide limit (12 to 50), in different boreholes. This is underlain by / Soft Disintegrated Rock (SDR) to a depth of 9.0 14.0 m. N values in this layer vary from 38 to 100. No cores were recovered in SDR strata due to weathering and fissuring. SDR strata is followed by refusal strata (N > 100), consisting of SDR / weathered rock / Hard rock. Drilling was done through this layer up to 3 m from refusal strata in BH-3 and BH-6. Rock with core recovery is seen in bore holes BH-2, BH-3, BH-5, BH-6 and BH-9. Core recovery varies from 42% to 82%, and RQD varies from 0% to 50%. Water table was seen between ground level and 5.40 m in different bore holes. 9

6. RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations are made for the proposed Multi Modal Logistic Hub project at VPT, Visakhapatnam. These recommendations are based on Standard Penetration Tests and Laboratory Tests on samples from Nine (09) bore holes, three (3) Field and Lab CBR tests, and four (4) Dynamic Cone Penetration Tests. Sub-soil Profile: The subsoil profile at the site can be broadly generalized as follows: Depth, m Strata N Value 0.00 7.00 Clay / Silty clay / silty sand 2 7 7.00 9.00 Clayey / Silty gravel 12 45 9.00 14.00 / Soft Disintegrated Rock (SDR) 38 100 Below 14.00 Refusal strata / Rock > 100 & Cores The top layer essentially consists of clay / silty clay / silty sand. Filled-up soil is observed only in BH-7 to a depth of 4.3 m. Thickness of the top layer varies from 3.0 m (BH-2) to 9.4 m (BH-7). N (SPT) values in this layer are very low. The top soil is followed by clayey gravel / silty gravel to a depth of 6.0 12.0 m, with N values varying over a wide limit (12 to 50), in different boreholes. This is underlain by / Soft Disintegrated Rock (SDR) to a depth of 9.0 15.0 m. N values in this layer vary from 38 to 100. No cores were recovered in SDR strata due to weathering and fissuring. Ground water level is generally at 0 2 m below the present GL. DCPT (Ncd) values at the four test locations vary from 3 to 125 in the depth range 0 to 10 m, and are, by and large, correlatable with SPT values at the corresponding depths in the nearby borehole data. 10

Soil & Rock Properties: Properties of top soil (clay / silty clay / silty sand) can be summarized as follows: Parameter / Property Value IS Classification (IS 1498) CH / CL / SM Dry density, kn/m 3 16.0 17.2 Specific gravity 2.64 2.69 Liquid limit, % 33 65 Plastic limit, % 18 34 Cohesion, kn/m 2 35 59 Angle of Internal Friction, Φ, deg. 0 10 Compressibility 0.23 0.35 CBR (Soaked) 3.0 4.0 Properties of clayey gravel / silty gravel are as follows: Parameter / Property Value IS Classification (IS 1498) GC / GM Unit weight, kn/m 3 17.9 19.3 Specific gravity 2.65 2.67 Liquid limit Plastic limit NP Cohesion, kn/m 2 10 35 Angle of Internal Friction, Φ, deg. 29 35 Properties of rock are as follows: Parameter / Property Value IS Classification (IS: 12070) Very Poor to Poor Rock Classification No. V / IV Dry Density, g/cm 3 2.71 2.73 Porosity, % 2.38 3.21 Water Absorption 1.79 2.93 Un-Confined Compressive Strength, kg/cm 2 550 910 11

FOUNDATIONS: Open foundations: Open (Footings / raft) foundations are recommended. Safe Bearing Capacity (SBC) is recommended as follows: B H No Ground Level, m + Soil Profile SBC at Depth, m (t/m 2 ) 2.0 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 1 5.3 1 2 3.91 3 4.45 4 4.25 5 4.41 6 3.85 7 6.55 8 3.85 9 5.56 0 4 m Silty clay 4 6 m Clayey gravel 0 1.2 m Silty clay 1.2 2 m Clay 2 3.3 m Silty clay 3.3 6 m Clayey 0-1.1 m Silty sand 1.2 3.4 m Clay 3.4 7.5 m Clayey gravel 0 1.5 m Silty clay 1.5 2 m Clay 2 4 m Silty clay 4 6 m Silty 0-1 m Silty clay 1 5.2 m Clay 5.2 6 m Clayey gravel 0-1 m Silty sand 1 5.6 m Clay 5.6 8.0 m Clayey gravel 0-4.3 m Filling 4.3 5.8 m Silty sand 5.8 9.4 m Clay 0-1.6 m Silty sand 1.6 6.5 m Clay 0-1.2 m Silty sand 1.2 3.7 m Clay 3.7 6.0 m Clayey gravel 8 10 12 12 12 15 15 15 8 10 12 15 15 15 20 20 8 10 10 15 15 15 20 20 8 10 10 15 15 15 20 20 8 10 10 10 10 10 20 20 8 10 10 10 10 10 15 20 Fill Fill Fill Fill 10 10 10 10 8 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 8 10 10 15 15 15 20 20 Notes: 1. Ground level refers to MSL. 2. Ground water level is generally at 0 2 m below the present GL. 3. All foundations resting in clay / silty clay should be placed in sand bed. 4. Typical calculations for SBC are given in Appendix-1. 12

Pile foundations: Alternatively, Pile foundations may be considered. Pile Capacities for different lengths and diameters are given separately for each bore hole in the following table. B H No Ground Level, m + Soil Profile 1 5.31 0 4 m Silty clay 4 6 m Clayey gravel 6-11.5 m N=38-56 11.5 12.0 m SDR N>50 2 3.91 0 1.2 m Silty clay 1.2 2 m Clay 2 3.3 m Silty clay 3.3 6 m Clayey 6-12 m N= 51-81 12-14 m SDR N=88-100 14-15 m Rock 3 4.45 0-1.1 m Silty sand 1.1 3.4 m Clay 3.4 7.5 m Clayey gravel 7.5 11.4 m N=57-70 11.4-14.6 m SDR >50 14.6-17.6 m Rock 4 4.25 0 1.5 m Silty clay 1.5 2 m Clay 2 4 m Silty clay 4 6 m Silty 6-10 m N =49-65 10-15 m SDR N 73-100 5 4.41 0-1 m Silty clay 1 5.2 m Clay 5.2 6 m Clayey gravel 6-9 m SDR N = 91-94 9-10 m Rock 6 3.85 0-1 m Silty sand 1 5.6 m Clay 5.6 8.0 m Clayey gravel 8-9.8 m N =56 9.8 14.8 m SDR N=50 96 14.8-17.8 m Rock Length, m 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 See Note6 10 10 Pile capacity Dia, mm 450 650 450 650 450 650 450 650 450 650 450 650 Vertical Capacity, tonnes 50 75 50 75 50 75 50 75 50 75 50 75 Safe lateral pile capacity, tonnes 7 11 7 11 7 11 7 11 7 11 7 11 13

B H No Ground Level, m + Soil Profile 7 6.55 0-4.3 m Filling 4.3 5.8 m Silty sand 5.8 9.4 m Clay 9.4-13.2 m Clayey gravel (N= 50-85) 13.2-15 m SDR N>50 8 3.85 0-1.6 m Silty sand 1.6 6.5 m Clay 6.5-8 m Clayey gravel 8 10.6 m N = 31-60 10.6 14 m SDR N=50-94 9 5.56 0-1.2 m Silty sand 1.2 3.7 m Clay 3.7 6.0 m Clayey gravel 6.0 6.7 m 6.7 9.0 m SDR N=50-85 9-10 m Rock SDR Soft Disintegrated Rock Notes on Pile foundations: 1. Ground level refers to MSL. Length, m 10 10 10 10 10 10 See Note6 2. Groundwater level is generally at 0 2 m below the present GL. 3. Typical calculations for Pile capacities are given in Appendix 2. 4. Lateral Pile capacity is taken as 15% of Vertical capacity. Pile capacity Dia, mm 450 650 450 650 450 650 5. All Piles considered to be of length 10 m, resting in gravel for 3 m depth. 6. (a) In BH-5 and BH-9, SDR is seen at a depth of 5 to 7 m. Vertical Capacity, tonnes 50 75 50 75 50 75 Safe lateral pile capacity, tonnes (b) If SDR is reached earlier than 10 m, Piles may be rested in SDR strata, with an embedment of 1.5 m. (c) Suggested minimum length of socket is as follows: where D is the diameter of Pile. Rock Type Sound Rock Moderately weathered rock Soft Rock 7. All requirements of IS Code: 2911 shall be adhered to. 8. For other Pile Capacities, Pile dia / length may be modified. Embedment Length 1 2 D 2 3 D 3 4 D 7 11 7 11 7 11 14

Boundary wall foundations Specific Recommendations for Boundary Wall Foundation: The soils from 0 7 m are weak and soft soils (Clay /silty clay/silty sand). N values are less than 10. Considering the soft soils, the following alternatives are suggested: Open foundations at a depth of 3 m with SBC of 10 t / sq m, and sand bed. SBC calculations are given in Appendix 1 Alternatively, 10 m long Piles may be used. Pile dia may be 300 mm with a vertical pile capacity of 20 tonnes. Pile capacity calculations are given in Appendix-3. PAVEMENT: It should be noted that the top soil essentially consists of clay / silty clay / silty sand. Thickness of this layer varies from 3.0 m to 9.5 m below existing ground level in different boreholes. Filled up soil of thickness 4.3 m exists in the area of Bore Hole-7. Soaked CBR values of the top soil (clay/silty clay/silty sand) are quite low (3% to 4%). Design: As per Tender Document, Axle load transferred for each side of front axle of container handling Reach Stacker equipment is taken as 50 MT. Sri Mohan Kumar, Manager, Railway Division, AARVEE Consultants, has given Cumulative Standard Axles as 1.971 million times with full load over the surface. From IRC: 37 2001 (Guidelines for Design of Flexible Pavments), Fig. 1 ( Pavement design Thickness Chart ), For CBR = 3 %, and Cumulative Standard Axles = 2 million, Total Pavement Thickness T = 580 mm, say 600 mm 15

Pavement design of Combination Block for 2 million Cumulative Standard Axles is as follows (IRC: 37-2001): Total Pavement Thickness T = Y + Z = 600 mm Where Y = Thickness of Granular Base = 225 mm Z = Thickness of Granular Sub Base = 375 mm X = Thickness of Surfacing = 20 mm 16

Base Material: This requires the load spreading properties to reduce the stresses on the subgrade. This has an important bearing on the performance of block pavement. Since the available strata are unsuitable, base course should consist of unbound crushed rock, water bound macadam, wet mix macadam, cement-bound crushed rock / granular materials, and lean cement concrete. In broad terms, whenever the subgrade is weak (with CBR < 5 %, as in the present case), use of bound granular materials like cement treated crushed rock, requiring a relatively thinner base, is recommended. Sub - base Material: The quality of sub-base materials includes natural gravels, cement treated gravels, sand stabilized sub grade materials. The quality of sub grade materials should be in conformance with IRC: 37-2001 (Guidelines for the Design of Flexible Pavements). Drainage: Drainage of the pavement structural section improves its performance. Adequately designed sub surface drainage system consisting of an open graded drainage layer with collector and outlet pipes should be provided (IRC: 37-2001). 17

CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF SOIL & WATER: Results of Chemical analysis of soil are as follows: Parameter Range Average ph 7.76 8.02 7.9 Chlorides as Cl, ppm 420 445 433 Sulphates as SO4, ppm 282 201 242 Results of Chemical analysis of water are as follows: Parameter Range Average ph 6.23 7.15 6.7 Chlorides as Cl, mg/l 23100 24400 23750 Sulphates as SO4, mg/l 4093 5068 4580 The values of Chlorides and Sulphates in water are in excess of permissible limits as per IS: 456, and may have deleterious influence on concrete and steel. Effective precautionary measures are required. Use of Sulphate-Resistant Cement and Corrosion-Resistant Steel is recommended for sub-structure. (Dr. D. BABU RAO) M.E., Ph.D. (USA), MIGS Former Professor & Head of Civil Engineering Principal Geotechnical Consultant (Dr. N. VENKAT RAO) M.Sc. Tech., Ph.D. FAEG, MIGS Former Professor & Head of Geophysics Geological Consultant & Proprietor 18

Project: Soil Investigation for proposed Multi Modal Logistic Hub at Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh. TABLE 1: SUMMARY OF DRILLING S.No. DEPTH DRILLED, (m) GL, (m) DEPTH OF WATER LEVEL, (m) RL of Water BH-1 12.0 5.31 2.2 3.11 BH-2 15.0 3.91 1.8 2.11 BH-3 17.6 4.45 0.2 4.25 BH-4 15.0 4.25 1.2 3.05 BH-5 10.0 4.41 1.4 3.01 BH-6 17.8 3.85 0.2 3.65 BH-7 15.0 6.55 5.4 1.15 BH-8 14.0 3.85 0.0 3.85 BH-9 10.0 5.56 0.0 5.56 19

Project: Soil Investigation for proposed Multi Modal Logistic Hub at Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh. TABLE - 2: SUMMARY OF RESULTS OF LABORATORY TESTS TABLE 2(a): Specific gravity, NMC, Bulk and Dry Density, Atterberg Limits (LL, PL, PI) & Consolidation test (Compressibility, Cc) SNo BH No. D, m Soil 1 Sp. Gr. NMC Bulk density kn/m 3 Dry density Atterberg Limits LL PL PI 3.0 Silty clay 2.64 16.5 19.4 17.2 43 29 34 0.24 Clayey 2 4.0 2.67 17.9 NP gravel 9.3 19.6 3 BH-1 6.0 gravel 2.66 6.3 20.1 18.5 NP 4 8.0 gravel 2.65 5.8 20.3 18.8 NP 5 10.0 gravel 2.65 7.5 20.7 18.9 NP 6 2.0 Clay 2.67 18.4 18.9 16.0 61 26 35 0.33 Clayey 7 4.0 2.68 NP gravel 7.1 19.3 18.0 8 BH-2 6.0 gravel 2.65 6.5 19.9 18.7 NP 9 8.0 gravel 2.66 6.1 20.1 18.9 NP 10 10.0 gravel 2.65 5.8 20.2 19.1 NP 11 12 4.0 13 BH-3 6.0 2.0 Clay 2.68 17.3 19.0 17.1 64 25 39 0.32 Clayey gravel Clayey gravel 2.65 9.1 19.3 17.7 NP 2.67 8.3 19.4 17.9 NP 14 8.0 gravel 2.64 7.7 20.5 19.0 NP 15 10.0 gravel 2.65 6.4 20.4 19.2 NP 16 2.0 Silty Clay 2.68 12.4 19.2 17.1 46 18 28 0.27 17 4.0 Silty gravel 2.66 10.5 20.1 18.2 NP BH-4 18 6.0 gravel 2.65 6.7 20.1 18.8 NP 19 8.0 gravel 2.66 6.1 20.1 18.9 NP 20 2.0 Clay 2.68 17.9 19 16.1 60 24 36 0.35 21 3.0 Clay 2.67 17.5 19.1 16.3 59 26 33 0.35 BH-5 22 4.0 Clay 2.67 17.1 19.5 16.7 62 34 28 0.31 23 5.2 Silty gravel 2.65 5.6 19.6 18.6 NP Cc 20

Table-2(a) Contd SNo 24 BH No. D, m Soil Sp. Gr. NMC Bulk density kn/m 3 Dry density Atterberg Limits LL PL PI 2.0 Clay 2.68 19.1 18.9 15.9 49 25 24 0.23 Cc 25 4.0 Clay 2.68 18 19.1 16.2 54 29 35 0.31 26 BH-6 6.0 Clayey gravel 2.68 7.3 19.3 18.0 NP 27 8.0 gravel 2.64 5.2 19.6 18.6 NP 28 9.0 gravel 2.65 5.2 19.8 18.8 NP 29 5.0 Silty Sand 2.66 12.3 19.1 17.0 33 21 12 0.27 30 6.0 clay 2.69 18.3 18.7 15.8 65 34 31 0.33 31 BH-7 8.0 clay 2.67 17.7 19.0 16.1 62 32 30 0.34 32 10.0 Silty gravel 2.65 7.2 19.4 18.1 NP 33 12.0 gravel 2.66 5.8 20.4 19.3 NP 34 2.0 clay 2.68 16.1 19.2 16.5 64 29 35 0.30 35 BH-8 4.0 clay 2.67 17.6 19.1 16.2 50 24 25 0.34 36 6.0 clay 2.69 16.1 19.7 17.0 52 28 24 0.30 37 8.0 gravel 2.65 3.3 18.6 18.0 NP 38 2.0 clay 2.68 16.3 19.2 16.5 55 22 33 0.32 39 BH-9 4.0 Clayey gravel 2.66 7.8 19.1 17.7 NP 40 6.0 gravel 2.65 2.6 19.1 18.6 NP NOTATION: D Depth, m, Sp. Gr. Specific gravity, NMC Natural Moisture Content %, LL Liquid Limit %, PL.. Plastic Limit %, PI.. Plasticity Index, NP.. Non plastic, Cc Compressibility. 21

TABLE 2(b): Particle size Distribution (Sieve & Hydrometer) S. No BH No. D, m Soil Grain Size, % Gr Sa Si Cl 1 3.0 Silty clay 0 0 21 79 BH-1 Clayey 2 4.0 27 33 15 25 gravel 3 3.0 Silty clay 3 12 19 66 BH-2 Clayey 4 4.0 29 40 11 21 gravel 5 3.0 Clay 0 0 5 95 BH-3 6 8.0 gravel 60 18 19 3 7 4.0 Silty gravel 37 41 18 4 BH-4 8 6.0 gravel 47 33 12 8 9 4.0 Clay 0 0 29 71 BH-5 10 5.2 Silty gravel 29 46 15 10 Clayey 11 6.0 36 27 27 10 gravel BH-6 12 8.0 gravel 43 28 21 8 13 6.0 clay 0 0 33 67 BH-7 14 12.0 gravel 56 11 27 6 15 6.0 clay 0 0 24 76 16 BH-8 8.0 gravel 45 25 21 9 17 10.0 gravel 41 32 23 4 18 19 BH-9 4.0 2.0 clay 0 3 27 70 Clayey gravel 36 23 18 23 20 6.0 gravel 58 16 22 4 Notation: D Depth, m Gr >4.75 mm Sa Sand 4.75 0.075 mm Si Silt 0.075 0002 mm Cl Clay < 0.002 mm, 22

TABLE 2(c): Direct / Triaxial Shear Tests S. No BH No. D, m Soil Direct Shear Triaxial Shear C, kn/m 2 Φ, deg C, kn/m 2 Φ, deg 1 2.0 Clay 46 3 2 4.0 Clayey gravel 14 29 BH-1 3 6.0 gravel 10 33 4 8.0 gravel 8 34 5 2.0 Clay 51 0 6 4.0 Clayey gravel 10 31 BH-2 7 6.0 gravel 15 34 8 8.0 gravel 11 35 9 2.0 Clay 54 3 10 4.0 Clayey gravel 7 30 BH-3 11 6.0 Clayey gravel 11 32 12 8.0 gravel 13 35 13 2.0 Silty Clay 35 10 14 4.0 Silty gravel 12 33 BH-4 15 6.0 gravel 10 34 16 8.0 gravel 13 35 17 2.0 Clay 49 5 18 BH-5 4.0 Clay 52 0 19 5.2 Silty gravel 14 33 20 2.0 Clay 52 0 21 4.0 Clay 57 0 BH-6 22 6.0 Clayey gravel 13 32 23 8.0 gravel 10 34 24 5.0 Silty Sand 13 31 25 6.0 clay 50 3 26 BH-7 8.0 clay 53 0 27 10.0 Silty gravel 14 34 28 12.0 gravel 12 35 29 6.0 clay 59 0 BH-8 30 8.0 gravel 8 34 31 2.0 clay 49 5 BH-9 32 6.0 gravel 11 34 C Cohesion, kn/m 2, Φ Angle of Internal Friction, deg. 23

Project: Soil Investigation for proposed Multi Modal Logistic Hub at Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh. TABLE - 3: RESULTS OF LABORATORY TESTS ON ROCK SAMPLES BORE HOLE No. DEPTH OF SAMPLE (m) Unit Weight, kn/m 3 Porosity (%) Water absorption UCC, kg/cm 2 BH-3 14.6 15.6 27.1 3.21 2.93 550 BH-6 16.8 17.8 27.3 2.38 1.79 910 UCC Unconfined Compressive Strength TABLE - 4 (a): RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF SOIL Sno. Parameter Units BH-2, SPT-2.0m BH-5, SPT-4.0m BH-8, SPT-6.0m 1 ph (1:5 Solution) --- 7.76 8.02 8.00 2 Chlorides as Cl Ppm 445 420 430 3 Sulphates as SO4 Ppm 201 197 182 TABLE - 4 (b): RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF WATER Sno Parameter Units Bore Water-1 Bore Water-2 Permissible values as per IS: 456 1 ph -- 6.23 7.15 Not less than 6 2 Chloride as CaCo3 mg/l 24400 23100 2000 for Concrete 500 for Reinforced Concrete 3 Sulphate as CaCo3 mg/l 5068 4093 400 24

Project: Soil Investigation for proposed Multi Modal Logistic Hub at Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh. TABLE - 5 (a): RESULTS OF FIELD CBR TESTS S. No. Test No. Location Sample Depth, m Soil Unsoaked CBR, % Soaked CBR, % 1 FCBR-1 Near BH-8 0.30 Silty sand 7.3 4.2 2 FCBR-2 Near BH-4&5 0.30 Silty clay 6.6 3.4 3 FCBR-3 Near BH-2 0.30 Silty clay 6.2 3.1 TABLE - 5 (b): RESULTS OF LAB CBR TESTS S. No. Sample No. Location Soil Unsoaked CBR, % Soaked CBR, % 1 CBR-1 FCBR-1 Silty sand 5.4 3.7 2 CBR-2 FCBR-2 Silty clay 4.9 3.5 3 CBR-3 FCBR-3 Silty clay 5.5 3.4 Note: Lab CBR values are generally less than Field CBR values since in field CBR test, a larger volume of soil, and hence more representative sample, is tested, and since the density of compacted CBR mould would generally be less than in-situ density as the in-situ soil is in confined condition unlike the laboratory mould. 25

Project: Soil Investigation for proposed Multi Modal Logistic Hub at Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh. TABLE - 6: RESULTS OF DCPT TESTS Table-6(a): DCPT-1 (Near BH-1) Sno Depth DCPT (N cd) 1 2.0 8 2 4.0 18 3 6.0 67 4 8.0 98 5 10.0 121 Table-6(b): DCPT-2 (Near BH-3) Sno Depth DCPT (N cd) 1 2.0 8 2 4.0 51 3 6.0 79 4 8.0 100 5 10.0 123 Table-6(c): DCPT-3 (Near BH-5) Sno Depth DCPT (N cd) 1 2.0 5 2 4.0 6 3 6.0 109 4 8.0 125 Table-6(d): DCPT-2 (Near BH-8) Sno Depth DCPT (N cd) 1 2.0 3 2 4.0 5 3 6.0 9 4 8.0 55 5 10.0 105 6 12.0 118 26

Project: Soil Investigation for proposed Multi Modal Logistic Hub at Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh. APPENDIX-1: CALCULATION OF SAFE BEARING CAPACITY FOR OPEN FOUNDATIONS a) Foundations resting in clay / silty clay at 2 m depth: i)shear Criterion : Assumed depth of foundation D= 2 m Assumed width of foundation B= 2 m Unit wt of soil = 16.0 kn/cum Submerged unit wt r = 6.2 kn/cu m Cohesion c = 35 kn / sq m Angle of internal friction = 0 deg Nc = 5.14 Nq =1.0 Nr = 0,0 Using IS Code: 6403-1981 formula : Net ult BC = 1.3 cnc + r D ( Nq - 1) + 0.4 r B Nr = 234 kn/sq m With a FS of 3.0, SBC = 78 kn/ sq m Recommended SBC is 8 t / sq m, with sand bed. ii)settlement Criterion : As per IS: 8009( Part 1)-1978 Settlement = [ p B ( 1- µ 2 ) I ] / E Where, p = Pressure, kn/ sq m = 78 kn/ sq m µ = Poisson s ratio = 0.5 E = Young s Modulus = 5000 kn/sq m I = Influence Factor =0.95 Substituting, Settlement = 22.5 mm < 40 mm (OK) a) Foundations resting in clay / silty clay at 3 m depth: i)shear Criterion : Assumed depth of foundation D= 3 m Assumed width of foundation B= 2 m Unit wt of soil = 16.0 kn/cum Submerged unit wt r = 6.2 kn/cu m Cohesion c = 45 kn / sq m Angle of internal friction = 0 deg Nc = 5.14 Nq =1.0 Nr = 0,0 Using IS Code: 6403-1981 formula : Net ult BC = 1.3 cnc + r D ( Nq - 1) + 0.4 r B Nr = 300 kn/sq m With a FS of 3.0, SBC = 100 kn/ sq m Recommended SBC is 10 t / sq m, with sand bed. ii)settlement Criterion : As per IS: 8009( Part 1)-1978 Settlement =[ p B ( 1- µ 2 ) I ] / E Where, p = Pressure, kn/ sq m = 100 kn/ sq m µ = Poisson s ratio = 0.5 E = Young s Modulus = 5000 kn/sq m I = Influence Factor =0.95 Substituting, Settlement = 28.5 mm < 40 mm (OK) 27

b) Foundations resting in clay gravel / silty gravel at 3 m depth: i)shear Criterion : Assumed depth of foundation D= 3 m Assumed width of foundation B= 2 m Unit wt of soil = 17.0 kn/cum Submerged unit wt r = 7.2 kn/cu m Cohesion c = 32 kn / sq m Angle of internal friction = 30 deg Nc = 16.17 Nq =7.36 Nr =6.64 Using IS Code: 6403-1981 formula : Net ult BC = 1.3 c Nc + r D ( Nq - 1) + 0.4 r B Nr = 619 kn/sq m With a FS of 3.0, SBC = 206 kn/ sq m Recommended SBC is 20 t / sq m. ii)settlement Criterion : As per IS: 8009 (Part 1)-1978 (Fig. 9) For B= 2, N = 35 Settlement in m per unit pressure (kg/sq cm) =0.006 Settlement for Pressure of 200 kn/sq m (2 kg/sq cm) = 0,006 x 2 x 1000 =12 mm < 40 mm (OK) 28

Project: Soil Investigation for proposed Multi Modal Logistic Hub at Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh. APPENDIX-2: Typical Calculations for Pile Capacity a) Cast in situ Bored RCC Piles : Pile Diamter D = 450 mm Vertical Load: Perimeter = P = 1.413 m C/S area A =.0.16 sq m Length of pile L = 10 m, including 3 m embedment in gravel Unit weight r = 16 kn/cu m Effective unit wt r = 6.2 kn/ cum End bearing : Average angle of internal friction at pile tip φ = 40 deg ( for N = 50) IS :6403 Corresponding Nq value is 140 (IS: 2911 1982 ) Ultimate pile capacity in bearing : Q b = A r L Nq = 0.16 x 6.2 x 10 x 140 = 1389 kn Skin friction : Neglect skin friction in clay/silty clay For gravel : Angle of wall friction = δ = 30 degrees (assumed) Earth pressure coefficient K = 0.75 ( assumed ) fs= 0.5 x r x L x K x tan δ = 0.5 x 6.2 x 3 x 0.75 x 0.58 = 4 kn/ sq m Qf = fs x P L = 4 x 1.413 x 3 = 17 kn Pile capacity = Qb + Qf = 1389 + 17 = 1406 kn With a FS of 2.5, Safe Pile capacity = 562 kn Recommended vertical Pile capacity = 50 tonnes 29

b) Cast in situ Bored RCC Piles : Pile Diamter D = 600 mm Vertical Load : Perimeter = P = 1.884 m C/S area A =0.28 sq m Length of pile L = 10 m, including 3 m embedment in gravel Unit weight r = 16 kn/cu m Effective unit wt r = 6.2 kn/ cum End bearing : Average angle of internal friction at pile tip φ = 40 deg ( for N = 50) IS :6403 Corresponding Nq value is 140 (IS: 2911 1982 ) Ultimate pile capacity in bearing : Q b = A r L Nq = 0.28 x 6.2 x 10 x 140 = 2430 kn Skin friction : Neglect skin friction in clay/silty clay For gravel : Angle of wall friction = δ = 30 degrees (assumed) Earth pressure coefficient K = 0.75 ( assumed ) fs= 0.5 x r x L x K x tan δ = 0.5 x 6.2 x 3 x 0.75 x 0.58 = 4 kn/ sq m Qf = fs x P L = 4 x 1.884 x 3 = 22.6 kn Pile capacity = Qb + Qf = 2430 + 22.6 = 2453 kn With a FS of 2.5, Safe Pile capacity = 981 kn Recommended vertical Pile capacity = 75 tonnes 30

Project: Soil Investigation for proposed Multi Modal Logistic Hub at Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh. APPENDIX-3 Typical Calculations for Boundary wall foundations Cast in situ Bored RCC Piles : Pile Diamter D = 300 mm Vertical Load : Perimeter = P = 0.94 m C/S area A =.0.07 sq m Length of pile L = 10 m, including 3 m embedment in gravel Unit weight r = 16 kn/cu m Effective unit wt r = 6.2 kn/ cum End bearing : Average angle of internal friction at pile tip φ = 40 deg ( for N = 50) IS :6403 Corresponding Nq value is 140 (IS: 2911 1982 ) Ultimate pile capacity in bearing : Q b = A r L Nq = 0.07 x 6.2 x 10 x 140 = 607 kn Skin friction : Neglect skin friction in clay/silty clay For gravel : Angle of wall friction = δ = 30 degrees (assumed) Earth pressure coefficient K = 0.75 ( assumed ) fs= 0.5 x r x L x K x tan δ = 0.5 x 6.2 x 3 x 0.75 x 0.58 = 4 kn/ sq m Qf = fs x P L = 4 x 0.94 x 3 = 11 kn Pile capacity = Qb + Qf = 607 + 11 = 618 kn With a FS of 2.5, Safe Pile capacity = 247 kn Recommended vertical Pile capacity = 20 tonnes Pile dia may be modified for other capacities. 31

Annexure-1 FIELD BORE CHARTS 32

. DTL C IN Z NATS UDNI H WBM ROAD BUILDING PIPE LINE BUILDING PIPE LINE BUILDING EXISTING COMPOUND WALL BUILDING LLA WDNUOP MOC GNI TSI XE 22 21 1 02 81 BUILDING DEHS DEHS PIPE LINE FENCING LLA WDNUOP MOC GNI TSI XE G IN PPI HS NAVARS S/ M N WODOG EGIDRB G IN PPI HS NAVARS S/ M N WODOG HGI W G IN PPI HS NAVARS S/ M N WODOG (A DRAY KCATS RE IN AT NOC O ) T G ES IN PPI NE HS IC L( NAVARS S/ M PILLAR 7 6 5 8 9 4 11 10 3 MINDI VILLAGE DW NUOP MOC GNI TSI XE ALL UNDW G IST PO EX OM IN C LLA LLA DW NUOP MOC GNI TSI XE 19 DAOR 21 20 GATE 25 24 23 22 EGE LL I IV ND I M C5.2 4 c LL A UN D PO TI NG IS EX W M CO )st D A O R YR TE MEC LLE W HTL: 14.05 R.L : 9.57 UL VE RT C UL VE RT C RD: 7.22 RD: 7.27 RD: 7.17 RD: 8.27 RD: 6.99 R.L : 9.28 R.L : 9.5 HTL: 17.17 HTL: 17.12 HTL: 16.15 HTL: 16.74 R.L : 9.27 R.L : 8.87 HTL: 13.96 HTL: 13.73 R.L : 9.2 R.L : 8.66 R.L : 8.45 ET AG PIPE LINE TREVL UC FENCING 411 PILLAR PILLAR 17 17 16 PILLAR PILLAR 19 PILLAR PILLAR PILLAR PILLAR 1 2 in ar Dnep O wlo Fr et a W ROAD 18 15 14 13 12 Dnep O a W Fr et ar wlo ni ar wlo D nep O Fr et a W ni HTL: 13.46 HTL: 13.21 B.H:-9 E=735700.737 N=1959100.880 Z=5.56 R.L : 8.97 R.L : 8.36 DAOR 140.67 M Dnep O et a W PILLAR ni ar Fr wlo HTL: 12.51 HTL: 11.86 B.H :- 3 E=735812.558 N=1959137.541 Z= 4.45 DCPT-2 E=735814.334 N=1959122.278 Z=4.45 R.L : 8.85 R.L : 8.11 RD: 7.43 RD: 7.23 RD: 7.51 RD: 7.11 RD: 7.2 RD: 7.18 ni ar D nep O wlo rf et a W PIPE CULVERT RD: 6.85 RD: 6.7 RD: 7 RD: 7.09 RD: 6.35 RD: 6.34 RD: 6.04 RD: 5.94 RD: 5.9 RD: 5.68 RD: 5.58 RD: 5.62 60.62 M 85 M86. M34. 96 176.83 M M75. 66 70.65 M RD: 4.71 Dnep O te a W Fr ar wlo ni CBR-3 E=735866.217 N=1959041.708 Z=3.70 B.H - 2 E=735837.562 N=1958962.450 Z=3.91 BH:-1 E=735812.500 N=1958787.500 Z=5.31 DCPT-1 E=735799.470 N=1958740.845 Z=6.49 M5.6 671 HTL: 17.17 HTL: 17.14 105.66 M M89. 151 ni ar D nep O wlo Fr et a W R.L : 8.36 R.L : 7.72 Ø900 HUME PIPES R.L : 8.16 R.L : 7.67 CULVERT RD: 6.82 RD: 6.79 RD: 7.04 RD: 7.02 CULVERT RD: 5.5 RD: 5.52 127.49 M HTL: 12.66 RD: 5.48 RD: 5.38 RD: 5.35 RD: 5.44 RD: 5.25 RD: 5.31 RD: 5.32 RD: 5.39 RD: 5.36 HTL: 13.67 HTL: 13.77 RD: 5.46 RD: 5.6 R.L : 8.4 R.L : 7.96 R.L : 7.92 HTL: 16.69 R.L : 8 HTL: 16.67 R.L : 8.18 RD: 5.51 RD: 5.43 RD: 6.72 RD: 6.71 RD: 6.47 HTL: 10.54 HTL: 10.46 RD: 6.51 R.L : 7.96 RD: 5.42 RD: 5.44 R.L : 8.05 R.L : 7.47 RD: 5.44 R.L : 7.28 R.L : 6.74 R.L : 6.98 R.L : 6.45 R.L : 6.75 R.L : 6.29 STATION:- BLCL-1 E=736402.161 N=1959302.627 Z=7.121 R.L : 6.51 R.L : 6.07 VPT TBM-20 R.L:- 5.820 RD: 6.13 RD: 6.35 RD: 6.35 RD: 6.09 RD: 5.43 RD: 5.48 RD: 5.34 RD: 5.4 RD: 5.37 RD: 6.43 RD: 6.41 RD: 6.19 RD: 5.44 M76. 19 72.32 M RD: 6.19 RD: 5.46 RD: 6.06 RD: 5.4 RD: 5.67 B.H:- 4 E=735962.539 N=1959112.559 Z= 4.25 120.18 M RD: 5.43 RD: 5.45 145.71 M M06. 761 141.50 M 136.97 M M23. 101 B.H = 5 E=736087.483 N=1959187.431 Z= 4.41 DCPT-3 E=736075.451 N=1959174.718 Z=4.40 CBR:-2 E=736071.641 N=1959142.480 Z=4.46 B.H :- 6 E=736237.433 N=1959112.548 Z=3.85 M86. 7 RD: 5.83 RD: 6.1 RD: 6.28 RD: 6.11 RD: 5.36 RD: 5.33 251.22 M 64 B.H :- 7 E=736337.511 N=1959212.402 Z= 6.55 B.H :- 8 E=736487.442 N=1959187.459 CBR:-1 E=736367.558 N=1959170.653 Z=5.09 Z=3.85 M40. 251 M71. DCPT-4 E=736495.211 N=1959212.818 Z=3.72 FIG:1 SITE PLAN SHOWING THE LOCATIONS BORE HOLES, CBR & DCPT Project: Soil Investigation for Proposed Multi Modal Logistic Hub at Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh BORE HOLES DYNAMIC CONE PENETRATION TEST CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO RD: 6.12 RD: 5.57 RD: 5.51 RD: 6 RD: 5.89 RD: 5.71 RD: RD: 4.45 5.83 RD: RD: 5.53 4.7 RD: 5.19 M00. 15 M16. 39 RD: 5.83 RD: 4.35 RD: 3.91 RD: 5.32 R.L : 6.23 R.L : 5.83 RD: 5.37 RD: 5.44 RD: 5.3 RD: 5.03 RD: 5.24 R.L : 5.92 R.L : 5.67 RD: 5.69 RD: 5.95 RD: 5.94 RD: 5.88 RD: 5.14 RD: 5.09 RD: 5.84 RD: 5.54 RD: 5.7 RD: 5.59 RD: 5.76 RD: 5.52 RD: 5.93 RD: 6.06 RD: 5.92 RD: 6.01 RD: 6.05 RD: 6.06 RD: 6.28 RD: 6.08 RD: 6 RD: 6.29 RD: 6.21 RD: 6.09 RD: 5.27 RD: 5.56 RD: 4.93 RD: 5.43 RD: 5.7 RD: 5.14 RD: 5.26 RD: 5.56 RD: 5.76 RD: 6.3 RD: 6.29

0.0m 4.0m 6.0m 11.5m 12.0m BH-1 GL=005.31 Silty clay 2m N=5 2.2m 4m N=12 Clayey 6m N=38 8m N=56 10m N=86 SDR 12m N=>100 0.0m 1.2m 2.0m 3.3m 6.0m 12.0m 14.0m 15.0m BH-2 GL=003.91 FIG:2 LOG OF BORE HOLES Project: Soil Investigation for Proposed Multi Modal Logistic Hub at Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh Silty clay Clay 1.8m 2m N=5 Silty clay 4m N=25 Clayey 6m N=51 8m N=68 10m N=81 12m N=88 SDR 14m N=>100 Rock 0.0m 1.2m 3.4m 7.5m 11.4m 14.6m BH-3 GL=004.45 0.2m Silty sand 2m N=5 Clay 4m N=34 Clayey 6m N=45 8m N=57 10m N=70 12m N=87 SDR 14m N=>100 0.0m 1.5m 2.0m 4.0m 6.0m 10.0m 15.0m BH-4 GL=004.25 Silty clay 1.2m Clay 2m N=3 Silty clay 4m N=47 Silty 6m N=49 8m N=65 10m N=73 12m N=91 SDR 14m N=>100 0.0m 1.0m 5.2m 6.0m 9.0m 10.0m BH-5 GL=004.41 Silty clay 1.4m 2m N=3 Clay 4m N=4 5.2m N=51 Silty 6m N=91 SDR 8m N=94 9m N=>100 Rock 0.0m 1.0m 5.6m 8.0m 9.8m 14.8m BH-6 GL=003.85 0.2m Silty sand 2m N=4 Clay 4m N=7 6m N=29 Clayey 8m N=56 10m N=95 12m N=96 SDR 14m N=>100 0.0m 4.3m 5.8m 9.4m 12.0m 13.2m 15.0m BH-7 GL=006.55 2m N=8 Filling 4m N=7 Silty sand 5.4m 6m N=5 Clay Clayey SDR 0.0m 1.6m 6.5m 8.0m 10.6m 14.0m BH-8 GL=003.55 0.0m Silty sand 5m N=4 2m N=2 8m N=7 10m N=50 12m N=85 14m N=>100 4m N=3 Clay 6m N=5 Clayey 8m N=31 10m N=60 12m N=94 SDR 14m N=>100 0.0m 1.2m 3.7m 6.0m 6.7m 9.0m 10.0m BH-9 GL=005.56 0.0m Silty sand 2m N=4 Clay 4m N=29 Clayey 6m N=47 7m N=85 SDR 9m N=>100 Rock NOT TO SCALE N= value WATER TABLE Rock 17.6m Rock 17.8m

Project: Soil Investigation for proposed Multi Modal Logistic Hub at Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh. Depth 0.0 1.0 1.0 Sampling 1.00 D/S FIELD BORE LOG CHART SPT BORE HOLE NO. 1 Length No. blows for (m) of Log of Depth Type Description Penetration of Run Bore (m) From To (m) (15-30-45)cm Value Pieces(cm) Ground Level: Dia. Of Casing: NX Water Table: 2.20m Details of Rock core N >10cm core Total No. of % of core Length (cm) Pieces Recovery RQD Value % Avg. RQD % Water colour Red Rate of Drill Min/m 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 5.0 1.0 5.0 6.0 1.0 6.0 8.0 2.0 8.0 10.0 2.0 10.0 11.5 1.5 Silty clay Clayey 2.00 SPT 2-2-3 5 3.00 UDS 4.00 SPT 4-6-6 12 5.00 D/S 6.00 SPT 9-18-20 38 7.00 D/S 8.00 SPT 13-22-34 56 9.00 D/S 10.00 SPT 26-37-49 86 11.00 D/S Red yellow yellow yellow yellow yellow yellow 11.5 12.0 0.5 SDR yellow 12.00 SPT 17cm/50blows >50 SDR=Soft Disintigrated Rock cm/50= no.of blows sp=small pieces vsp=very Small Pieces

Project: Soil Investigation for proposed Multi Modal Logistic Hub at Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh. Depth 0.0 1.2 1.2 Silty clay Sampling 1.00 D/S FIELD BORE LOG CHART Length No. blows for (m) of Log of Depth Type Description Penetration of Run Bore (m) From To (m) (15-30-45)cm Value Pieces(cm) SPT BORE HOLE NO. 2 Ground Level: Dia. Of Casing: NX Water Table: 1.80m Details of Rock core N >10cm core Total No. of % of core Length (cm) Pieces Recovery RQD Value % Avg. RQD % Water colour Reddish Rate of Drill Min/m 1.2 2.0 0.8 Clay 2.0 3.3 1.3 Silty clay 2.00 SPT 2-2-3 5 3.00 UDS Reddish Reddish 3.3 4.0 0.7 4.0 6.0 2.0 6.0 8.0 2.0 Clayey 4.00 SPT 8-11-14 25 5.00 D/S 6.00 SPT 12-19-32 51 7.00 D/S 8.00 SPT 18-31-37 68 8.0 10.0 2.0 10.00 SPT 21-38-43 81 10.0 12.0 12.0 14.0 2.0 2.0 SDR 11.00 13.00 D/S D/S 12.00 14.00 SPT SPT 30-40-48 16cm/100blows 88 >100 14.0 15.0 1.0 Rock 11+13=24 48 2no+6 sp 48% 24% Milky SDR=Soft Disintigrated Rock cm/50= no.of blows sp=small pieces vsp=very Small Pieces

Project: Soil Investigation for proposed Multi Modal Logistic Hub at Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh. Depth 0.0 1.1 1.1 Silty sand Sampling 1.00 D/S FIELD BORE LOG CHART Length No. blows for (m) of Log of Depth Type Description Penetration of Run Bore (m) From To (m) (15-30-45)cm Value Pieces(cm) SPT BORE HOLE NO. 3 Ground Level: Dia. Of Casing: NX Water Table: 0.20m Details of Rock core N >10cm core Total No. of % of core Length (cm) Pieces Recovery RQD Value % Avg. RQD % Water colour Red Rate of Drill Min/m 1.1 2.0 0.9 2.0 3.4 1.4 Clay 2.00 SPT 2-2-3 5 3.00 UDS Red 3.4 4.0 0.6 4.0 6.0 2.0 6.0 7.5 1.5 Clayey 4.00 SPT 8-12-22 34 5.00 D/S 6.00 SPT 10-18-27 45 7.00 D/S 7.5 8.0 0.5 8.0 10.0 2.0 10.0 11.4 1.4 8.00 SPT 14-23-34 57 9.00 D/S 10.00 SPT 18-31-39 70 11.00 D/S 11.4 12.0 0.6 SDR 12.00 SPT 25-41-46 87 SDR=Soft Disintigrated Rock cm/50= no.of blows sp=small pieces vsp=very Small Pieces BH-3 Cont..

BH-3 Cont..d Project: Balmer & lawrie- vizag Ground Level: BORE HOLE Dia. Of Casing: NX NO. 3 Date : 02-08-2014 to 03-08-2014 Water Table: 0.20m Depth Sampling SPT Details of Rock core Length No. blows for (m) of Log of Depth Type Description Penetration of Run Bore (m) From To (m) (15-30-45)cm Value Pieces(cm) Pieces 12.0 14.0 2.0 14.0 14.6 0.6 SDR 13.00 D/S 14.00 SPT 10cm/50blows >50 FIELD BORE LOG CHART N >10cm core Total No. of % of core Length (cm) Recovery 14.6 15.6 1.0 Core sample 11 67 1+20 small 67% 11% Milky 15.6 16.6 1.0 Rock Core sample 11 75 1+16 small 75% 11% Milky 16.6 17.6 1.0 Core sample 10+13=23 82 2+11 small 82% 23% Milky SDR=Soft Disintigrated Rock cm/50= no.of blows sp=small pieces vsp=very Small Pieces RQD Value % Avg. RQD % Water colour Rate of Drill Min/m

Project: Soil Investigation for proposed Multi Modal Logistic Hub at Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh. Depth 0.0 1.5 1.5 Silty clay Sampling 1.00 D/S FIELD BORE LOG CHART Length No. blows for (m) of Log of Depth Type Description Penetration of Run Bore (m) From To (m) (15-30-45)cm Value Pieces(cm) SPT BORE HOLE NO. 4 Ground Level: Dia. Of Casing: NX Water Table: 1.20m Details of Rock core N >10cm core Total No. of % of core Length (cm) Pieces Recovery RQD Value % Avg. RQD % Water colour Rate of Drill Min/m 1.5 2.0 0.5 Clay 2.0 4.0 2.0 Silty clay 4.0 6.0 2.0 2.00 SPT 1-1-2 3 3.00 UDS 4.00 SPT 14-18-29 47 5.00 D/S 6.00 SPT 13-19-30 49 6.0 8.0 2.0 8.00 SPT 21-29-36 65 9.00 D/S 8.0 10.0 2.0 10.00 SPT 25-32-41 73 11.00 D/S 10.0 12.0 2.0 Brownish 12.00 SPT 31-40-51 91 12.0 14.0 2.0 SDR 14.0 15.0 1.0 Silty 14.00 SPT 10cm/100blows >100 15.00 D/S Brownish Brownish SDR=Soft Disintigrated Rock cm/50= no.of blows sp=small pieces vsp=very Small Pieces

Project: Soil Investigation for proposed Multi Modal Logistic Hub at Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh. 0.0 1.0 1.0 Silty clay 1.00 D/S FIELD BORE LOG CHART BORE HOLE NO. 5 Depth Sampling SPT Length No. blows for (m) of Log of Depth Type Description Penetration of Run Bore (m) From To (m) (15-30-45)cm Value Pieces(cm) Ground Level: Dia. Of Casing: NX Water Table: 1.40m Details of Rock core N >10cm core Total No. of % of core Length (cm) Pieces Recovery RQD Value % Avg. RQD % Water colour Rate of Drill Min/m 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 Clay 4.0 5.2 1.2 2.00 SPT 1-1-2 3 3.00 UDS 4.00 SPT 1-2-2 4 5.00 D/S 5.20 SPT 14-19-32 51 5.2 6.0 0.8 Silty 6.00 SPT 32-40-51 91 7.00 D/S 6.0 8.0 2.0 8.00 SPT 38-41-53 94 SDR 8.0 9.0 1.0 9.00 SPT 12cm/100blows >100 2no+5 Milky 9.0 10.0 1.0 Rock Core sample 12+10=22 42 42% 22% sp Grey SDR=Soft Disintigrated Rock cm/50= no.of blows sp=small pieces vsp=very Small Pieces

Project: Soil Investigation for proposed Multi Modal Logistic Hub at Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh. Depth 0.0 1.0 1.0 Silty sand Sampling 1.00 D/S FIELD BORE LOG CHART Length No. blows for (m) of Log of Depth Type Description Penetration of Run Bore (m) From To (m) (15-30-45)cm Value Pieces(cm) SPT BORE HOLE NO. 6 Ground Level: Dia. Of Casing: NX Water Table: 0.20m Details of Rock core N >10cm core Total No. of % of core Length (cm) Pieces Recovery RQD Value % Avg. RQD % Water colour Red Rate of Drill Min/m 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 5.6 1.6 Clay 2.00 SPT 1-2-2 4 3.00 UDS 4.00 SPT 2-3-4 7 5.00 D/S Red 5.6 6.0 0.4 6.0 8.0 2.0 8.0 Clayey 6.00 SPT 9-11-18 29 7.00 D/S 8.00 SPT 17-22-34 56 9.00 D/S 9.8 1.8 9.8 10.0 0.2 10.0 12.0 2.0 12.0 14.0 2.0 14.0 14.8 0.8 SDR 10.00 SPT 28-41-54 95 11.00 D/S 12.00 SPT 30-40-56 96 13.00 D/S 14.00 SPT 11cm/50blows >50 14.8 15.8 15.8 16.8 1.0 1.0 Rock Core sample Core sample _ 11 60 67 Total small 1+10 small 60% 67% _ 11% Milky Milky 16.8 17.8 1.0 Core sample 10+16+14+10 4+3 79 =50 small 79% 50% Milky SDR=Soft Disintigrated Rock cm/50= no.of blows sp=small pieces vsp=very Small Pieces

Project: Soil Investigation for proposed Multi Modal Logistic Hub at Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh. Depth 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 4.3 0.3 Filling Sampling 2.00 SPT 2-4-4 8 4.00 SPT 4-5-2 7 FIELD BORE LOG CHART Length No. blows for (m) of Log of Depth Type Description Penetration of Run Bore (m) From To (m) (15-30-45)cm Value Pieces(cm) SPT BORE HOLE NO. 7 Ground Level: Dia. Of Casing: NX Water Table: 5.40m Details of Rock core N >10cm core Total No. of % of core Length (cm) Pieces Recovery RQD Value % Avg. RQD % Water colour Rate of Drill Min/m 4.3 5.0 0.7 5.0 5.8 0.8 Silty sand 5.00 SPT 1-2-2 4 Red Red 5.8 6.0 0.2 6.00 SPT 2-2-3 5 7.00 UDS 6.0 8.0 2.0 Clay 8.00 SPT 2-3-4 7 9.00 D/S 8.0 9.4 1.4 9.4 10.0 0.6 10.0 12.0 2.0 12.0 13.2 1.2 Clayey 10.00 SPT 9-22-28 50 11.00 D/S 12.00 SPT 16-38-47 85 13.00 D/S 12.2 14.0 1.8 14.0 15.0 1.0 SDR 14.00 SPT 12cm/50blows >50 15.00 D/S SDR=Soft Disintigrated Rock cm/50= no.of blows sp=small pieces vsp=very Small Pieces

FIELD BORE LOG CHART Project: Soil Investigation for proposed Multi Modal Logistic Hub at Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh. Depth Sampling BORE HOLE NO. 8 Length No. blows for (m) of Log of Depth Type Description Penetration of Run Bore (m) From To (m) (15-30-45)cm Value Pieces(cm) SPT Ground Level: Dia. Of Casing: NX Water Table: 0.00m Details of Rock core N >10cm core Total No. of % of core Length (cm) Pieces Recovery 1.00 D/S 0.0 1.6 1.6 Silty sand Red RQD Value % Avg. RQD % Water colour Rate of Drill Min/m 1.6 2.0 0.4 Red 2.00 SPT 1-1-1 2 3.00 UDS 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.00 SPT 1-1-2 3 Clay 5.00 D/S 4.0 6.0 2.0 6.00 SPT 1-2-3 5 6.0 6.5 0.5 6.5 8.0 1.5 Clayey 7.00 D/S 8.00 SPT 8-13-18 31 9.00 D/S 10.00 SPT 13-26-34 60 8.0 10.0 2.0 10.0 10.6 0.6 10.6 12.0 1.4 12.0 14.0 2.0 11.00 D/S 12.00 SPT 27-45-49 94 SDR 13.00 D/S 14.00 SPT 13cm/50blows >50 SDR=Soft Disintigrated Rock cm/50= no.of blows sp=small pieces vsp=very Small Pieces

Project: Soil Investigation for proposed Multi Modal Logistic Hub at Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh. Depth Sampling 1.00 D/S FIELD BORE LOG CHART BORE HOLE NO. 9 Length No. blows for (m) of Log of Depth Type Description Penetration of Run Bore (m) From To (m) (15-30-45)cm Value Pieces(cm) 0.0 1.2 1.2 Silty sand SPT Ground Level: Dia. Of Casing: NX Water Table: 0.00m Details of Rock core N >10cm core Total No. of % of core Length (cm) Pieces Recovery RQD Value % Avg. RQD % Water colour Red Rate of Drill Min/m 1.2 2.0 0.8 Red 2.00 SPT 1-2-2 4 3.00 UDS 2.0 3.0 1.0 Clay 3.0 3.7 0.7 3.7 4.0 0.3 4.0 6.0 2.0 Clayey 4.00 SPT 6-10-19 29 5.00 D/S 6.00 SPT 11-19-28 47 6.0 6.7 0.7 6.7 7.0 0.3 7.00 SPT 25-38-47 85 SDR 8.00 D/S 7.0 9.0 2.0 9.00 SPT 9cm/50blows >50 1+13 9.0 10.0 1.0 Rock Core sample 10 68 68% 10% Milky small SDR=Soft Disintigrated Rock cm/50= no.of blows sp=small pieces vsp=very Small Pieces

Annexure 2 BIS (IS) CODES 1. IS: 2131 1981: Method of Standard Penetration Test for Soils. 2. IS: 4968 (Part 1) 1976: Method for subsurface sounding for soils. 3. IS: 2132: Code of Practice for thin walled tube sampling of Soils. 4. IS: 2720 Part I various parts: Methods of Laboratory Tests for Soils. 5. IS: 1498 1970: Classification and Identification of Soils for General Engineering Purpose. 6. IS: 6403 1981: Code of Practice for determination of Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations. 7. IS: 12070 1987: Code of Practice for Design and Construction of Shallow Foundations on Rocks. 8. IS: 8009 1976 (Part I): Code of Practice for calculation of settlements of Foundations. 9. IS: 78 1983 Appendix I: Classification and Characteristics of Rocks. 10. IS: 1892 1962: Code of Practice for Site Investigations for Foundations. 11. IS: 4453 1985: Code of Practice for presentation of drilling information and core description in foundation investigation. 12. IS: 4078: Code of Practice for indexing and storage of drill cores. 13. IS: 6926 1996: Diamond Core Drilling for Site Investigation. 14. IRC: 37 2001: Guidelines for the Design of Flexible Pavements. 15. IS: 2720 (Part-31): 1969 Field Determination of California Bearing Ratio. 16. IS: 4968 (Part-1) 1976: Method for Subsurface Sounding for Soils: Part 1: Dynamic Method using 50 mm Cone without Bentonite slurry.