Statistical Process Control Basics. LeanSix LLC

Similar documents
Chapter 5: Methods and Philosophy of Statistical Process Control

5.1 Introduction. Learning Objectives

An Introduction to Statistical Process Control Charts (SPC) Steve Harrison

Analysis of Highland Lakes Inflows Using Process Behavior Charts Dr. William McNeese, Ph.D. Revised: Sept. 4,

Denise L Seman City of Youngstown

GRI-GM20 * Selecting Variable Intervals for Taking Geomembrane Destructive Seam Samples Using Control Charts

Equation 1: F spring = kx. Where F is the force of the spring, k is the spring constant and x is the displacement of the spring. Equation 2: F = mg

Internet Technology Fundamentals. To use a passing score at the percentiles listed below:

Legendre et al Appendices and Supplements, p. 1

Effective Use of Box Charts

DO YOU KNOW WHO THE BEST BASEBALL HITTER OF ALL TIMES IS?...YOUR JOB IS TO FIND OUT.

The use of Control Charts with Composite materials. E. Clarkson, Statistician ASQ Certified Quality Engineer

To help us make good management decisions in the way we react to that variation. To understand the variation that lives within our data

STAT 155 Introductory Statistics. Lecture 2-2: Displaying Distributions with Graphs

1. The data below gives the eye colors of 20 students in a Statistics class. Make a frequency table for the data.

Statistical Process Control Lab

Some information on Statistical Process Control (SPC) c charts that may be useful for clinical teams

September 2017: Aspen Snowmass Real Estate Market Snapshot RELEASED 10/08/17 ON OR NEAR THE 1ST MONDAY EACH MONTH

PUBLISHED PROJECT REPORT PPR850. Optimisation of water flow depth for SCRIM. S Brittain, P Sanders and H Viner

PIQCS HACCP Minimum Certification Standards

SURFLINE TEAHUPOO, TAHITI SURF REPORT

Controls and Control Charting

PSY201: Chapter 5: The Normal Curve and Standard Scores

Estin Report: Summer 2015 Market Snapshot Aspen Snowmass Real Estate

Calculations for Line-of- Balance Diagrams

Designing and Benchmarking Mine Roads for Safe and Efficient Haulage. Roger Thompson Alex Visser

Author s Name Name of the Paper Session. Positioning Committee. Marine Technology Society. DYNAMIC POSITIONING CONFERENCE September 18-19, 2001

Lesson 1: Decimal Place Value. Concept/Topic to Teach: Students use Bruins statistical data to order and compare decimals to the thousandths.

STANDARD SCORES AND THE NORMAL DISTRIBUTION

August 2016: Aspen Snowmass Real Estate Market Snapshot RELEASED 9/9/2016 ON OR NEAR THE 1ST MONDAY EACH MONTH

Quality Assurance Charting for QC Data

Journal of Manufacturing Systems

Flaw Detection Capabilities with Eddy Current Array Technology

Calculation of Trail Usage from Counter Data

Section 2C Formulas with Dividing Decimals

Technical Bulletin, Meter Factor Linearization

Statistical Process Techniques on Water Toxicity Data

MATH 114 QUANTITATIVE REASONING PRACTICE TEST 2

DEVELOPING COMBINED EVENT ATHLETES IN THE COLLEGIATE SYSTEM. Nate Davis Assistant Coach Combined Events, PV & HJ University of Wisconsin

Influence of the size of a nation s population on performances in athletics

USATF 2008 SUPER CLINIC CRITICAL GENERAL PERFORMANCE DESCRIPTORS FOR THE SHORT HURDLES. Ralph Mann, Ph.D.

Falmouth and St.Austell pspa bird bycatch analysis report year

1. KNOBBED CYLINDERS (CYLINDER BLOCKS)

Traffic Parameter Methods for Surrogate Safety Comparative Study of Three Non-Intrusive Sensor Technologies

Grade: 8. Author(s): Hope Phillips

LESSON 6: SIGHT ADJUSTMENT AND SCORING

DETERMINATION OF THE DEPTH OF CLOSED BLIND CRACKS IN NON-METAL CHECK SAMPLES AND TEST PANELS FOR PENETRANT TESTING

AP Physics 1 Multiple Choice Questions - Chapter 3

LESSON 6: SIGHT ADJUSTMENT AND SCORING

USING DENIER TO STANDARDIZE FLY TYING THREAD

INTRODUCTION TO SAMPLING FOR MINERAL PROCESSING. Part 7 in a series Effects on Recovery and NSR

Robert Jones Bandage Report

Impact of Lead Free on Automated X-Ray Inspection

CORRELATION EFFECTS IN THE FIELD CLASSIFICATION OF GROUND BASED REMOTE WIND SENSORS

API 10A Cooperative Testing Report Austin, TX January 2017

CHM Introductory Laboratory Experiment (r17sd) 1/13

SEDIMENT BUDGET OF LIDO OF PELLESTRINA (VENICE) Written by Marcello Di Risio Under the supervision of Giorgio Bellotti and Leopoldo Franco

ACCURACY, PERFORMANCE, AND HANDLING OF OIL-FILLED DIGIQUARTZ PRESSURE INSTRUMENTATION

The Coach then sorts the 25 players into separate teams and positions

Energy capture performance

Overview and preview. I. Tides as Waves (really really big) What are the Forces driving these waves? II: Into make-believe.

Section 3-5: Principle 3: Determine Critical Limits

Charting a Path to Lift Off? Understanding the Shifting Economic Winds

New Theory on Facial Beauty: Ideal Dimensions in the Face And its application to your practice

Evaluation of NEA haddock Harvest Control Rules

living with the lab control of salinity 2012 David Hall

110m Hurdle Theory and Technique

Line Following with RobotC Page 1

Pairwise Comparison Models: A Two-Tiered Approach to Predicting Wins and Losses for NBA Games

Assessment of correlations between NDE parameters and tube structural integrity for PWSCC at U-bends

Introduction. Seafood HACCP Alliance Training Course 8-1

The Effect of Newspaper Entry and Exit on Electoral Politics Matthew Gentzkow, Jesse M. Shapiro, and Michael Sinkinson Web Appendix

TARGET SCORING. WRAS Targets

Policy Management: How data and information impacts the ability to make policy decisions:

USA TRACK & FIELD NATIONAL OFFICIALS COMMITTEE Technical Manager Certification Rules Review (v 1.0)

Background Information. Project Instructions. Problem Statement. EXAM REVIEW PROJECT Microsoft Excel Review Baseball Hall of Fame Problem

LABORATORY EXERCISE 1 CONTROL VALVE CHARACTERISTICS

Manual of Petroleum Measurement Standards Chapter 13 Statistical Aspects of Measuring and Sampling

UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL EXAMINATIONS General Certificate of Education Ordinary Level

ROYAL CANADIAN AIR CADETS PROFICIENCY LEVEL FOUR INSTRUCTIONAL GUIDE SECTION 2 EO M DESCRIBE THE MAGNETIC COMPASS PREPARATION

COMPARISON STUDY BETWEEN THE EFFICIENY OF THE START TECHNIQUES IN THE ROMANIAN COMPETITIVE SWIMMING

Art[,' c ""j) 01/1 /

ALABAMA HUNTING SURVEY

Clutch Hitters Revisited Pete Palmer and Dick Cramer National SABR Convention June 30, 2008

Hydraulic and Economic Analysis of Real Time Control

The Bruins I.C.E. School

THERMALLING TECHNIQUES. Preface

A Comparative Analysis of Motor Fitness Components among Sprinters, Throwers and Jumpers

ROUNDABOUT CAPACITY: THE UK EMPIRICAL METHODOLOGY

POWER Quantifying Correction Curve Uncertainty Through Empirical Methods

LocoMorph Deliverable 4.4 part 2.4

% per year Age (years)

VISCOMETER, OFI, 8-SPEED, MODEL 800 PART No

Running head: DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION 1

Understanding the interest-rate growth differential: its importance in long-term debt projections and for policy

MEMORANDUM. To: PRL Performance Standards Subgroup From: Donna Pratt Subject: Performance Method Recommendation Date: January 18, 2001

QUESTIONS and ANSWERS WHY TEST KONGSBERGS

TPM TIP. Oil Viscosity

Risk factors at level crossings with flashing lights in the Czech Republic

Boyle s Law: Pressure-Volume Relationship in Gases

Transcription:

Statistical Process Control Basics

Statistical Process Control (SPC) is an industry standard methodology for measuring and controlling quality during the manufacturing process. Attribute data (measurements) is collected from products as they are being produced. By establishing upper and lower control limits, variations in the process can be detected before they result in defective product, entirely eliminating the need for final inspection.

SPC can easily be used to control anything that can be counted. Before initiating any SPC program, it is necessary to determine what to count. These are termed control points. Control points can be related to: Process Product Financials The first hurdle to SPC is determining proper control points based ideally on 32 samplings.

For process control, proper average charts consist Of several pieces of related data: 1. 15 to 30 days of actual data. 2. A line showing the average of the most recent 15 to 30 days of data. This line should coincide with the specification aim. 3. The Lower Control Limit line (LCL) A line showing the average minus three standard deviations of the most recent 15 to 30 days of data. 4. The Upper Control Limit line (UCL) A line showing the average plus three standard deviations of the most recent 15 to 30 days of data. 5. Relevant historical data, generally LCLs and UCLs for the past 30, 90, and 150 days.

Upper Control Limit (UCL) Lower Control Limit (LCL) Average Actual Data

What does this Average Chart show: The process is under statistical control (actual data are well within +/ three standard deviations). Over the past 60, 90 & 150 days the process has improved (the UCL has gotten smaller and the LCL has gotten bigger). Note: the average line should coincide with the specification aim. If it does not, then generally more data should be included to determine the avg. Note: although the process is in statistical control and improving, measures should be taken to help reduce variability, in a perfect world, all actual data points would coincide with the average line.

For process control, proper range charts consist of several pieces of related data: 15 to 30 days of the range of actual data. A line showing the average range of the most recent 15 to 30 days of data. The Upper Control Limit line (UCLr) A line showing the average range plus three standard deviations of the average range of the most recent 15 to 30 days of data. Relevant historical data, generally UCLr s for the past 30, 90, and 150 days.

Upper Control Limit (UCLr) Average Actual Data

The process is under statistical control (actual data are well within + three standard deviations of the range). Over the past 60,90 & 150 days the process has improved (the UCLr has gotten smaller). Note: the average line should be a small number. Note: although the process is in statistical control and improving, measures should be taken to help reduce variability, in a perfect world, all actual data points would coincide the horizontal axis at zero.

Note that a process being in statistical control does not necessarily indicate that the process is "good enough" for manufacturing. A further condition is that the UCL and LCL on the Average Chart must be inside specification limits. For the final product, specification limits are generally dictated by the customer. For inprocess material specification, limits should be determined for each control point. An Average Chart in statistical control and in specification control is shown as follows. The importance of the delta or buffer between the specification and control limits is to ensure that design limits are controlled before they become problematic. It cannot be emphasized enough the you can t control what you don t measure and SPC is what allows you to do this.

Upper Control Limit (UCL) Lower Control Limit (LCL) Average Actual Data Lower Specification Limit Upper Specification Limit

Statistical Process Control Basics