SUPPLEMENT Well Control for Drilling Operations Workover & Completion for Supervisors Core Curriculum and Related Learning Objectives

Similar documents
SUPPLEMENT Well Control for Drilling Operations Workover & Completion for Drillers Core Curriculum and Related Learning Objectives

Practice Exam IADC WellSharp Driller and Supervisor

W I L D W E L L C O N T R O L FLUIDS

WellCAP IADC WELL CONTROL ACCREDITATION PROGRAM

Study Guide IADC WellSharp Driller and Supervisor

WellCAP IADC WELL CONTROL ACCREDITATION PROGRAM

W I L D W E L L C O N T R O L PRESSURE BASICS AND CONCEPTS

WellCAP IADC WELL CONTROL ACCREDITATION PROGRAM

International Well Control Forum. Well Intervention Pressure Control Level 2 Syllabus July 2015 Version 7.0

1. The well has been shut in on a kick and the kill operation has not started.

SPE Forum: Source Control for Wells in Shallow Water. Lars Herbst, Gulf of Mexico Regional Director

Blowout during Workover Operation A case study Narration by: Tarsem Singh & Arvind Jain, OISD

Well Control for Supervisors for Drilling Operations Core Curriculum and Related Learning Objectives

W I L D W E L L C O N T R O L COMPLICATIONS

Well Control for Drilling Operations Personnel Core Curriculum and Related Learning Objectives

Restoring Fluid Flow in Tubing Strings

APPENDIX A1 - Drilling and completion work programme

August 21, Deepwater MPD / PMCD

Completions & Workovers Module 1.9

CHDT Cased Hole Dynamics Tester. Pressure testing and sampling in cased wells

Well Control Institute (WCI) Core Curriculum and Related Learning Outcomes: Supervisory Level

Why Do Not Disturb Is a Safety Message for Well Integrity

Casing Design. Casing Design. By Dr. Khaled El-shreef

W I L D W E L L C O N T R O L SHUT-IN PROCEDURES

NORSOK standard D-010 Rev. 3, August 2004

Best Practices - Coiled Tubing Deployed Ball Drop Type Perforating Firing Systems

Well Control Drill Guide Example Only. Drill Guide is the list of drills, questions and attributes that are in DrillPad.

5k Slickline Lightweight Pressure Control Equipment 4 ID

Squeeze Cementing. Brett W. Williams Cementing Technical Advisor January 2016 Tulsa API Meeting

Worked Questions and Answers

Recommended minimum functional specifications and standards for geothermal wells in the Netherlands v.5

VOLUMETRIC METHODS and STRIPPING OPERATIONS

DE149. Wireline Servicing, Fishing Job for Completion and Workover

Advanced Applications of Wireline Cased-Hole Formation Testers. Adriaan Gisolf, Vladislav Achourov, Mario Ardila, Schlumberger

Subsea Safety Systems

NOT TO COPY -- NO DISSEMINATE WITHOUT WRITTEN AGREEMENT. Presentation JB AG JCN JR 1

DAY ONE. 2. Referring to the last question, what mud weight would be required to BALANCE normal formation pressure?

PTRT 1471: Exploration and Production I. Chapter 6: Drilling and Well Completion

WellCAP IADC WELL CONTROL ACCREDITATION PROGRAM

Drilling Efficiency Utilizing Coriolis Flow Technology

PROPOSED NEW SUB- CODE 1 RIG UP AND TEAR. Possibly Fits into Existing Code. 7/26/2018 Review PROPOSED NEW CODE EXISTING OPERATION

Dilution-Based Dual Gradient Well Control. Presented at the 2011 IADC Dual Gradient Workshop, 5 May 2011 by Paul Boudreau, Dual Gradient Systems LLC

Deepwater Horizon Incident Internal Investigation

International Well Control Forum. IWCF Drilling Well Control Syllabus Level 3 and 4 March 2017 Version 7.0

DB Bridge Plug. Features. Benefits. Applications

W I L D W E L L C O N T R O L COMPLETIONS AND WORKOVERS

IWCF Equipment Sample Questions (Combination of Surface and Subsea Stack)

WELL SCAVENGER. Versatile wellbore clean-up tool for the most demanding operations

DUO-SQUEEZE H LCM Mixing Tables and Operating Procedures

Abandonment Program for Paramount Fort Liard F 36

Chapter 4 Key Findings. 4 Key Findings

Understanding pressure and pressure

RULES OF THE OIL AND GAS PROGRAM DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES CHAPTER DRILLING WELLS TABLE OF CONTENTS

Is my well safe? Terje Løkke-Sørensen, CTO, add energy

COGCC OPERATOR GUIDANCE MECHANICAL INTEGRITY TEST GUIDANCE: PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES

On-Off Connector Skirt

Perforating Options Currently Available in Horizontal Shale Oil and Gas Wells. Kerry Daly, Global BD Manager- DST TCP

Inflatable Packer Single & Double. Single & Double Packer Dimension. Wireline Packer. Water Testing Packer (WTP) Packer

NORSOK Standard D-010 Rev 4. August 2012

Chapter 5 HORIZONTAL DRILLING

Reclassification and Recompletion

Success Paths: A Risk Informed Approach to Oil & Gas Well Control

Development of a Subsurface Mudline Packer to Reduce Risk of Flow after Cementing and Sustained Casing Pressure, While Providing a Platform for P&A.

117 NORWEGIAN OIL AND GAS RECOMMENDED GUIDELINES FOR WELL INTEGRITY

Successful Deployment of a Long Gun String Via Intelligent Coiled Tubing

Disposal/Injection Well Pressure Test Report (H-5)

PTTCO Drilling Well Control Training Course

Texas Administrative Code

Hydro-Mech Bridge Plug

Offshore Managed Pressure Drilling Experiences in Asia Pacific. SPE paper

HPHT Annular Casing Packer. Obex Annular Casing Packer

Pump Fillage Problem Overview. Jim McCoy. 9 th Annual Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop. Renaissance Hotel Oklahoma City, Oklahoma September 17-20, 2013

NeoProducts, LLC 1201 Dealers Ave. Harahan, LA Ph:

Engineered solutions for complex pressure situations

Worker Seriously Injured Servicing a Plunger Lift System

Well Control Modeling Software Comparisons with Single Bubble Techniques in a Vertical Well

Industry Code: Alberta Small Employer OHS Legislated Requirements

OPTIMUM SELECTION OF WELL CONTROL METHODS

Investigation of Loss of Well Control Eugene Island Block 277 OCS-G Well A-2 Off the Louisiana Coast July 6, 2001

VortexFlow DX (Downhole) Tool Installation Instructions

OCEAN DRILLING PROGRAM

Barrier Philosophy for Wells on Gas lift and Ways of Reducing HSE Risks. Alan Brodie Feb 2011 For more info visit

Coal and Water Protection. PADEP: Well Plugging & Subsurface Activities Division Bureau of Oil and Gas Planning & Program Management

Cased-Hole Logging Environment

Extended leak off testing

Annulus Communications Eliminated using Pressure- Activated Sealant

Chapter 5 Drilling and Well Testing Practices

Live well deployment of long perforating gun system using combined CT technologies

Pasquale Imbò e Marco Pelucchi ENI S.pA;

EXAMINER S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission

WELL SUSPENSION AND ABANDONMENT GUIDELINES AND INTERPRETATION NOTES OFFICE OF THE REGULATOR OF OIL AND GAS OPERATIONS

COMPLETING AND SERVICING CRITICAL SOUR WELLS INDUSTRY RECOMMENDED PRACTICE (IRP) VOLUME SANCTIONED APRIL 2006

The key to connectivity

Design criteria, planning critical for successful deepwater well testing in HPHT developments

--- III. itti A. on_ coo. & EP Department DOCUMENT NO: WOC-HSE-ST Section H005 Hydrates

Hard or Soft Shut-in : Which is the Best Approach?

North Dakota Petroleum Council Re-stimulation Initiative

Captain Wellhead & Tree

Jim McCoy. Tubing Anchor Effect on Pump Fillage. Lynn Rowlan Tony Podio Ken Skinner. Gas Well Deliquification Workshop.

Transcription:

SUPPLEMENT Well Control for Drilling Operations Workover & Completion for Supervisors Core Curriculum and Related Learning Objectives Form WSP-02-DO-SU-WOC-S Revision 0 13 February 2015 DC 2015 COPYRGHT PROTECTED DOCUMENT ll rights reserved. No part of this document may be distributed outside of the recipient s organization unless authorized by the nternational ssociation of Drilling Contractors.

Contents 1.0 Course Overview... 3 2.0 Curriculum... 4 2.1 ntroduction to Workover and Completion for Drilling Operations... 4 2.2 Completion and Workover Fluids... 5 2.3 Well Completion and Workover Equipment... 6 2.4 Workover Well Control Practices and Kill Methods... 9 2.5 Complications... 11 Page 2 of 13 Copyright DC 2015

1.0 Course Overview The purpose of this course core curriculum is to identify the well control body of knowledge and set of job skills needed by supervisory personnel who may be engaged in completion and workover operations. The curriculum is designed to supplement the Drilling Operations Supervisory-level course. cceptable Delivery Methods: nstructor-led training for the initial and repeat delivery of this Supplement is required, along with a knowledge assessment. Simulator or live well exercises are also required ; however, a simulator assessment is not required for this supplement. Minimum Course Length: Eight (8) hours are required for teaching the core curriculum. Course length includes simulator exercises, but excludes the knowledge assessment time. Maximum knowledge assessment time is forty-five (45) minutes. Course Curriculum Notes: The curriculum that follows includes five components: Sub-modules, M, Learning Topics, Learning Objectives and ssessment Guidelines. M: The M letters indicate the level of knowledge and skills required at the job level. The codes used in the M column are as follows: = wareness of Learning Topic = mplementation of the Learning Topic at this job level; needs an increased level of knowledge because they may have to take action on some task related to the topic. M = Mastery of Learning Topic at this job level; needs a full knowledge because they have to take action, perhaps unsupervised, on some task related to the topic. Learning Topics: This section provides guidance for instructors on what the trainee should learn. Learning Objectives and ssessment Guidelines: This section defines what trainees should be able to do at the conclusion of the training, and defines the assessment process, whether theoretical or practical, by providing examples of assessment content and expectations. Page 3 of 13 Copyright DC 2015

2.0 Curriculum 2.1 ntroduction to Workover & Completion for Drilling Operations Module Name: 2.1 ntroduction to Workover and Completion for Drilling Operations Sub-Modules M Learning Topics Learning Objectives and ssessment Guidelines The instructor will impart knowledge on: ntroduction to Workover and Completions Differences Between Drilling Operations and Workover / Completion Operations M Objectives of workover and completion operations. Different workover activities and types. Completion activities and types. Differences in workover and drilling activities that could result in a loss of containment. Describe the purpose of conducting workover or completion (for example, initiates, improves, or restores production). Describe the different types of activities that may occur during a workover in order to accomplish the objective (for example, wellbore activities: acidizing, fracking, sand clean out and removal, recompleting in new reservoir, scale or paraffin removal, control water, sidetrack or deepen, plug and abandon; equipment activities: removal or addition of tools, mechanical repair of worn or damaged equipment, pump change, clean perforation, or skin damage). Describe the different types of activities that may occur during a completion in order to accomplish the objective (for example, perforating, fracking, acidizing, flowing, reservoir test, openhole vs. cased-hole completion techniques). Describe the primary differences between workovers/completions and drilling (for example, fluid differences, downhole equipment (plugs, packers, flowthrough valves), shut-in considerations, formation pressures, depleted reservoirs, damage to tubing/casing, open hydrocarbon reservoir, fluid column characteristics). Page 4 of 13 Copyright DC 2015

2.2 Completion and Workover Fluids Module Name: 2.2 Completion and Workover Fluids Sub-Modules M Learning Topics Learning Objectives and ssessment Guidelines Friction Completion and Workover Fluids Brine Characteristics The instructor will impart knowledge on: Friction loss in the different well sections. Describe frictional losses in different well sections (slimhole, tight tubing/casing clearances). Explain how downhole tools/equipment affect friction and fluid flow. Reverse Circulation method. Describe the friction losses in the circulating system and the resulting well pressures when reverse circulating. Effect of friction on bottomhole pressure Determine the effect on BHP when circulating with tools, (BHP). equipment. Types of fluid. Describe the different types of brine and completion fluids (water-based, oil-based mud/synthetic-based mud). Describe the purpose and characteristics of fluids that make Purpose of fluid. them suitable for workover and completions (for example, compatibility with the zone; pressure control). Purpose of packer fluid. Describe the purpose of packer fluid in a completion. M Solids carrying capacity. Gas migration in brines. Density and composition. Temperature and pressure. Explain solids carrying capacity of brines with viscosifiers and without viscosifiers (for example, brines without viscosifiers have poor solids transport capacity, lower than that of drilling fluids). Explain gas migration in brines (for example, gas migrates at a much higher rate in brine than in viscous drilling fluid). Explain how various salt compositions affect the density range (for example, sodium chloride brine solutions can be weighted up to 10.0 ppg before saturation is reached. Describe the effect of temperature and pressure on brine density. Calculate the correct brine weight needed to balance BHP in a wellbore at a given temperature. Page 5 of 13 Copyright DC 2015

Module Name: 2.2 Completion and Workover Fluids Sub-Modules M Learning Topics Learning Objectives and ssessment Guidelines The instructor will impart knowledge on: Crystallization. Eutectic point/freezing point. Saturation. Recognize brine density loss due to crystallization and hygroscopic properties. dentify cause of crystallization and effect on brine density. Define the eutectic point / freezing point of brine and describe how it is related to crystallization. Describe brine saturation and how it relates to crystallization, maximum fluid weight, and the eutectic point. 2.3 Well Completion and Workover Equipment Module Name: 2.3 Well Completion and Workover Equipment Sub-Modules M Learning Topics Learning Objectives and ssessment Guidelines M Barrier Define and explain barrier and provide examples. Demonstrate how the wellhead, tubing hanger, and Surface equipment. Barrier Christmas tree act as a barrier to flow. M Management Blowout preventer (BOP) or Christmas tree dentify and evaluate the steps and barriers used to isolate removal. the well prior to removing a BOP or Christmas tree. dentify primary components of a Christmas tree and their Christmas tree components. purpose (for example, tree-cap; why use of a secondary master valve is important). dentify the appropriate locations of the equipment. Christmas Tree (Valves, Tees, Gauge Panels, Tree Caps, Chokes, Surface Safety Valves) Pressure testing. dentify pressure-sealing components and explain when these components should be tested as a barrier (for example, explain why a wing valve may need to hold pressure during a Bullhead). Page 6 of 13 Copyright DC 2015

Module Name: 2.3 Well Completion and Workover Equipment Sub-Modules M Learning Topics Learning Objectives and ssessment Guidelines Pressure limitations. dentify the pressure rating, mechanical limits, and conditional limits of equipment. Summarize how equipment may be degraded after service exposure. Metallurgical composition. dentify different trim types and their different service limits (for example, is a trim type). Ring seals and O-ring seals. Describe the type of seal created by: 1. a ring gasket between connections, and 2. O-ring seals between other components (for example, ring gasket seals provide a metalto-metal seal and require compression; O-ring seals do not require compression and typically have shorter service life). Tubing hangers and wellhead bowls. Explain the purpose of a tubing hanger and wellhead bowl (for example, access to the annulus for pressure monitoring, chemical injection, barrier to flow for the annulus, and possible barrier to the tubing). dentify test ports and voids that are tested to verify a tubing Tubing Hangers Testing tubing hanger seals. hanger seal. and Wellhead Bowls Subsurface Equipment Types of tubing hanger and wellhead bowl annulus seals. Control lines, electric submersible pump cables, and other components penetrating tubing hangers. Name types of tubing hanger and wellhead bowl annulus seals, and identify the correct uses of each (for example, elastomer seals; metal-to-metal seals). ndicate where tubing hangers must hold pressure (including around this external equipment). Downhole equipment recognition. Match downhole equipment to the correct name. Pressure isolation. dentify various downhole components that provide pressure isolation (packers, subsurface safety valve (SSSV), plugs, completion equipment, retrievable bridge plug (RBP), surface controlled subsurface safety valve (SCSSSV), wireline plugs, tubing, etc.). Page 7 of 13 Copyright DC 2015

Module Name: 2.3 Well Completion and Workover Equipment Sub-Modules M Learning Topics Learning Objectives and ssessment Guidelines Explain how subsurface equipment can be used to provide pressure isolation (for example, SCSSSV retains tubing flow when the wellhead is damaged by shutting a flapper). Testing of downhole equipment. Give examples of how to test downhole equipment to confirm it is a competent barrier. dentify limitations of downhole tests. Working pressure. dentify factors that affect working pressure ratings and limitations of subsurface equipment (for example, corrosion, wear, degradation, and burst rating). Subsurface complications. Describe hazards that may relate to downhole equipment (for example, trapped pressure under retrievable plugs; variation of thread types and correct matching of threads; correct rental equipment selection to match rig and completion equipment; testing limitations). dentify how to mitigate hazards. Removable wellhead equipment. Define removable wellhead equipment. Explain what valve removal plugs, two-way checks, and backpressure valves are and where they are located on a tree or wellhead. State reasons for using removable wellhead equipment; Removable pplications. state when it could be used versus should not be used. Wellhead Equipment Describe the key components of a lubricator and how a Lubricator tools. lubricator may be used to pull or retrieve removable wellhead equipment. dentify when trapped pressure may be present prior to Safe removal of wellhead equipment. removal of wellhead equipment, and demonstrate the ability to check for trapped pressure. Page 8 of 13 Copyright DC 2015

2.4 Workover Well Control Practices and Kill Methods Module Name: 2.4 Workover Well Control Practices and Kill Methods Sub-Modules M Learning Topics Learning Objectives and ssessment Guidelines Maintaining a fluid column. dentify reasons why keeping the hole full in workover or completion may not always be an option. Hole fill and fluid loss. Choose the correct action to take if filling the hole does not maintain enough hydrostatic (for example, losses of 10 bbl/hr are acceptable but any losses above 60 bbl/hr on a certain job may require a lost circulation material pill). Tracking fluid loss. Explain the importance of tracking losses when unable to maintain fluid level. Demonstrate the ability to shut in the tree at the proper Practices Shut-in procedures for tree components. location (for example, using the crown valve to isolate wireline lubricator). Choose correct procedures for shutting in on downhole Shut-in procedures. equipment and completions (for example, kill stand, Blind Shear Ram, drop the string). Explain why using shut in tubing pressure may not give an accurate measure of bottomhole pressure and resulting kill Determining Kill Mud Weight (KMW). mud weight (for example, unknown fluids in tubing). State other ways to measure bottomhole pressure (for example, pressure bomb, quartz gauge, merada gauge on wireline). dentify conditions when Bullheading may be preferred to Reasons for using Bullheading. circulation (for example, toxic gas present; unable to handle influx at surface; potential to exceed equipment limitations if circulated to surface). Bullheading Describe the basic principles of Bullheading (for example, Basic principles. push the formation fluid back into the formation). Explain how the rate of gas migration affects the chosen Effect of gas migration. Bullhead rate (for example, circulating rates must overcome the rate of migration). Page 9 of 13 Copyright DC 2015

Module Name: 2.4 Workover Well Control Practices and Kill Methods Sub-Modules M Learning Topics Learning Objectives and ssessment Guidelines Formation limitations. Describe how a Bullheading operation can fracture the formation (for example, hydrostatic pressure plus surface pressure can exceed formation strength and fracture the formation). Mechanical limitations. Determine the weakest mechanical link in a Bullheading operation Summarize how to mitigate a mechanical issue (for example, place pressure on the annulus to assist in burst). Volumetric Techniques and Lubricate (Lube) and Bleed Limiting factor for Bullheading operation. Determining if Bullheading was a success. Flow paths and barriers. Detecting initial injection (break-over) and Kill Mud Weight (KMW) hitting the perforations. Page 10 of 13 Copyright DC 2015 dentify whether it is mechanical or formation limitations that determine the maximum surface pressure that can be applied. Explain the difference between trapped pressure post Bullhead and a well in which hydrostatic is not sufficient to kill the well. dentify the flow paths of kill fluid during a Bullhead operation and the barriers restricting flow elsewhere. Explain difference between rising surface pressure and injection. Bullheading procedure and calculations. ndicate the procedure needed to Bullhead a well from start to finish. Use a kill sheet to prepare for a Bullheading operation. List reasons record keeping during Bullhead operation is important. Calculating Bullhead volume. Calculate the volume needed to Bullhead and kill the well. Calculating Kill Mud Weight. Calculate Kill Mud Weight (KMW) needed to Bullhead and pplying the Volumetric technique to a workover kill. kill the well. Explain the main differences between the Volumetric technique during drilling phase and during workover (for example, fluids in the well, gas migration rates, well configuration, potential leak paths).

Module Name: 2.4 Workover Well Control Practices and Kill Methods Sub-Modules M Learning Topics Learning Objectives and ssessment Guidelines pplying the Lube and Bleed technique to a workover kill. Explain the main differences between a Lube and Bleed technique during drilling phase and during workover (for example, fluids in the well, well configuration, reducing pressure to a level for Bullheading). Constant Bottomhole Pressure Methods (Forward and Reverse Circulation) pplying Normal Circulation method to a workover kill. pplying Reverse Circulation method to a workover kill. Explain the main differences between a normal circulation kill technique during drilling phase and during workover (for example, potential for greater friction, uncertainty of a clear flow path, integrity of circulating path, different wellbore fluids). Explain the main differences between a normal circulation kill technique during drilling phase and a reverse circulating technique during workover (for example, position of choke in the circulating path, start-up procedure, tubing string friction, different fluids in the well, integrity of circulating path). 2.5 Complications Module Name: 2.5 Complications Sub-Modules M Learning Topics Learning Objectives and ssessment Guidelines Trapped pressure. Explain the occurrence of trapped pressure in a workover operation and give examples of where this may occur. Explain and give examples of common failed barriers and mechanical parts occurring during workover. Workover Complications Explain and give examples of how to mitigate failed barriers Workover issues due to mechanically and mechanical parts (for example, a hole in the tubing that degraded equipment. leads to formation communication between the tubing/casing annulus; seals or packer leak; poor cement condition or placement). Page 11 of 13 Copyright DC 2015

Module Name: 2.5 Complications Sub-Modules M Learning Topics Learning Objectives and ssessment Guidelines ccuracy of well records. Explain the importance of accurate well records to the workover operation (plan and execution of the plan). List potential data issues with well records and how these inaccuracies can impact the workover plan and execution (for example, lost sinker bars; wireline or other tools left in the hole and never reported; incorrect depth correlation; perforations out of zone or in the wrong place; bridge plugs or cement dumped in the wrong place debris; inaccurate old surveys). mportance of proven barriers. Explain the importance of proving a barrier has pressureretaining capability (for example, never assume a well barrier has integrity until tested; well conditions or data accuracy can mislead rig crews into believing they have barrier integrity; having contingency plans if the barriers installed are not holding pressure or fail during a workover; understanding of maximum pressure that could be trapped below a shallow plug if a lower plug fails). Hydrates their formation and hazards. ndicate where hydrates may form, how pressure and temperature influence hydrate formation, and the hazards they present (for example, trapped pressure, equipment blockage). Hydrate removal and prevention. Explain how hydrates can be removed if they are blocking ram functions or creating a plug (for example, temperature, chemical injection, flow rate). Paraffin / sphaltenes. Describe where paraffin / asphaltenes are found and the problems they can cause (for example, commonly found in older oil producing wells; prevent wireline tools from being run in the hole; plug up valves and surface equipment). Scale. Explain the problems scale can cause and the potential for contamination and other associated risk. Page 12 of 13 Copyright DC 2015

Module Name: 2.5 Complications Sub-Modules M Learning Topics Learning Objectives and ssessment Guidelines Bacteria. Explain the causes of bacteria growth (with emphasis on sulfide reducing bacteria) and the problems and associated risk (for example, create H 2 S; effect on equipment). Page 13 of 13 Copyright DC 2015