ROUTE 124. Mountain Condos ROUTE OVERVIEW

Similar documents
DAILY TRIPS (OUTBOUND) Monday-Friday 6:45 AM to 7:40 PM 30/30/30 26 Saturday 6:45 AM to 6:40 PM 30/30 24 Sunday - - -

DAILY TRIPS (OUTBOUND/INBOUND) Weekdays 6:05 AM to 11:23 PM 30/30/ /28 Saturday 6:15 AM to 8:23 PM 60/60 24/23 Sunday / /

ROUTE 11 Downtown to KU to 31 st and Iowa SERVICE DESIGN

ROUTE 52 ALLENTOWN. Port Authority of Allegheny County

ROUTE 18B AVALON-SHADELAND EXPRESS

ROUTE 68A MONROEVILLE EXPRESS

ROUTE 75D PENN HILLS-MONROEVILLE

ROUTE 30 Bob Billings & Kasold to KU SERVICE DESIGN

Philadelphia Bus Network Choices Report

Pocatello Regional Transit Master Transit Plan Draft Recommendations

Everett Transit Action Plan. Community Open House November 16, 2015

Calgary Transit Route 302 Southeast BRT Year One Review June

ROUTE 67A MONROEVILLE

January Project No

Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council

TRANSIT RIDERSHIP IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAPITAL PROJECTS OPERATING PLANS - NEXT NETWORK TRANSIT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

Transit Workshop with MPO Board

City of Davenport CitiBus Public Transportation Study. April 2015

Community Transit Solutions for the Suburbs APTA Annual Meeting Steve Fittante, New Jersey Transit Corporation September 30, 2013

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Steve Feigenbaum Service Planning Manager Katharine Eagan, AICP Chief Operating Officer HART Tampa, Florida

City of White Rock. Strategic Transportation Plan. May 16, 2005

Camosun College Modal Split

BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

REGIONAL HOUSEHOLD TRAVEL SURVEY:

Working with School Bus Operators to Provide Community Transportation

TriMet Title VI and Transit Equity Impacts Assessment Recommended Service Changes Line 47 Baseline/Evergreen and 48 Cornell

SOLTRANS BOARD MEETING SUPPLEMENTAL REPORTS / HANDOUTS January 15, 2015 MEETING HANDOUTS

MIDCOAST MAINE TRANSIT STUDY. In Association with: MORRIS COMMUNICATIONS

System-Wide Stop List

PROJECT FACT SHEET March 21, 2018

Monthly Ridership and Service Level Report March, Safety, Courtesy, Reliability, and the Environment

Speaker: Brian Dranzik, Fiscal & Policy Administrator Milwaukee County

PURPOSE AND NEED SUMMARY 54% Corridor Need 1. Corridor Need 2. Corridor Need 3. Corridor Need 4. Corridor Need 5

PROJECT FACT SHEET May 25, 2018

1999 On-Board Sacramento Regional Transit District Survey

SUBJECT: Board Approval: 4/29/04

Providence Downtown Transit Connector STAKEHOLDER MEETING #2. Stakeholder Meeting #1 October 24, 2016

Eliminate on-street parking where it will allow for a dedicated bus only lane %

Interim Transit Ridership Forecast Results Technical Memorandum

. ' motion. APPLtlDK.L - L"iLC_t1GLR 201b APPENDIX 7 TECHNICAL MEMOS

Scheduling 101 Calculating Running Time Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority Multimodal Operations Workshop Houston, TX

More buses on the way: Balancing act, changes coming to Snoqualmie Valley transit Photos

Transit Operations in the I-95 Express Lanes

2017 LYNX RIDERSHIP YEAR END REVIEW

Capital Metro Monthly Ridership Report November 2016 (Fiscal Year 2017)

MOUNTAIN HOUSE SPECIFIC PLAN I 9.1 INTRODUCTION ASSUMPTIONS TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS PHASING 9.

Capital Metro Monthly Ridership Report December 2016 (Fiscal Year 2017)

FY2006 Budget Board Budget Committee request for information. Board Request: Detailed information on bus route 5A DC-Dulless Airport

Purpose and Need. Chapter Introduction. 2.2 Project Purpose and Need Project Purpose Project Need

Capital Metro Monthly Ridership Report September 2017 (Fiscal Year-end 2017)

Corridor Advisory Group Meeting #1 June 7, 2018

Final Study Recommendations AMES TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY. For Public Review and Comment. October Ames Transit Feasibility Study

2011 Origin-Destination Survey Bicycle Profile

Dutchess County Division of Mass Transit. Proposed LOOP Bus Service Changes. Public Information Meeting: January 8,

Executive Summary. TUCSON TRANSIT ON BOARD ORIGIN AND DESTINATION SURVEY Conducted October City of Tucson Department of Transportation

M14A/D Select Bus Service

Scottsdale Road/Rural Road Alternatives Analysis (AA) Study. Arizona ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 7, 2012

MORE CONNECTIONS. Redesigning routes for the future of transit in Milwaukee County.

KING STREET TRANSIT PILOT

Understanding Transit Demand. E. Beimborn, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

BEAR CREEK PARK AND RIDE

From Disarray to Complete Street:

Service Proposal for the City of Ashland, Oregon

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CRITERIA

SETTINGS AND OPPORTUNITIES MOBILITY & ACCESS

Preliminary Transportation Analysis

CURBSIDE ACTIVITY DESIGN

Service Analysis INTRODUCTION

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Ave

Capital Metro Monthly Ridership Report March 2018 (Fiscal Year 2018)

METRO Light Rail: Changing Transit Markets in the Phoenix Metropolitan Area

Impact of Regional Transit on Rider Quality of Life

Market Factors and Demand Analysis. World Bank

Guidelines for Providing Access to Public Transportation Stations APPENDIX C TRANSIT STATION ACCESS PLANNING TOOL INSTRUCTIONS

TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY

PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING

SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN: Survey Results and Analysis

Evan Johnson, Tindale Oliver & Associates. Alan Danaher, P.E., PTOE, AICP, PTP

Title VI Fare Change Equity Analysis

Next Steps Staff report to Council on October 2, 2018 to present the Whistler 2018 Transportation Action Plan Final Draft

Guide to travelling to and around Panmure April 2013

RVTD On-Board Passenger Study

VI. Market Factors and Deamnd Analysis

Transportation system and station for greater Goris town

Provide Employee Parking

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis

Appendix C: Online Survey Comments

Niantic Center Elementary School

A Selection Approach for BRT Parking Lots Nicolls Road Corridor Parking Study

David Jickling, Public Transportation Director Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County

South King County High-Capacity Transit Corridor Study

RE: 100 VARLEY LANE TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW

Appendix C. NORTH METRO STATION AREA TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT 88th Avenue Station

Welcome to the McKenzie Interchange Project Open House!

Westside Transportation Access Needs Assessment - Short and Long Term Improvements

Community Task Force July 25, 2017

Dial A Lift Customer Survey 2011 Executive Summary

FY 2018 I-66 Commuter Choice Program Presentation to the Northern Virginia Transportation Commission May 3,

2017 COAST TRANSIT AUTHORITY SERVICE REVIEW

Transcription:

ROUTE 124 Mountain Condos ROUTE OVERVIEW Route 124 is a seasonal route that provides a combination of fixed-route and demand-response service between Sugarbush s Lincoln Peak base area and condo complexes and other locations north and south of the base area (see Figure 1). Riders can transfer between Route 124 and other services at Sugarbush Lincoln Peak. Figure 1: Route Map Route 124 operates during the winter ski season from 8:00 AM to 5:50 PM, seven days a week. Fixed-route service operates until noon, after which time the route shifts to demand response service. AM fixed-route service operates every 40 minutes on weekdays and every 20 minutes on Saturdays and Sundays (see Table 1). All AM fixed-route service operates along the same alignment. Trips start at Lincoln Peak, and when there are requests, begin with service to a number of request stops: Snow Creek and South Village, both along Inferno Road Buffalo Bill s Resort, which is on Triview Road West Hill House, just past the end of Inferno Road on West Hill Road Route 124 Profile 1

Table 1: Schedule Statistics SERVICE DAY Monday-Friday Saturday Sunday SPAN OF SERVICE 8:20 AM to 11:57 AM 11:45 AM 5:50 PM 8:00 AM to 11:37 AM 11:45 AM 5:50 PM 8:00 AM to 11:37 AM 11:45 AM 5:50 PM FREQUENCY (MIN) 40/40/ Dial-a-Ride 20/20/ Dial-a-Ride 20/20/ Dial-a-Ride DAILY TRIPS (OUTBOUND/INBOUND) 6/6 11/11 11/11 Peak frequencies are calculat ed for service between 6:00 am 9:00 am & 3:00 pm 6:00 pm. Midday service is 9:00 am 3:00 pm. Evening service is for service aft er 6:00 pm. Saturday and Sunday frequencies are shown as AM/PM. When service operates to these locations, buses then proceed back along Inferno Road to Sugarbush Village Road, and upon request, via the Sugarbush Health and Racquet Club (SHaRC). They then operate back to Sugarbush Village Road. If service is not requested to any of the request stops, buses proceed directly to Sugarbush Village Road and then up Summit Drive to serve condos and residences along the road up to the intersection of Summit Drive and North Lynx Drive, where they turn around. Buses then returns downhill to Lincoln Peak with a stop at Sugarbush Village. Afternoon service serves the same locations, but with all service by request and specific alignments consisting of the shortest paths between pickups and drop-offs. There are no set times for the demand response service, with the bus dispatched as soon as requests are received. RIDERSHIP As on all of the Mad River Valley routes, ridership is highest on weekends and lowest on weekdays. Route 124 carries 251 passengers on Saturdays, 147 on Sundays, and 60 on weekdays. Actual ridership on any given day can be either much higher or lower depending upon snow conditions. Ridership by Stop Weekdays Only boarding data is available for Route 124, with boardings reported on a round trip basis. From this data it is clear that most ridership is to and from the Lincoln Peak based area. In the order that stops are served, boardings by stop are as follows (see Figure 2): 34 at Lincoln Peak Two at Snow Creek/South Village Zero at Buffalo Bill s Resort Zero at West Hill House Four at SHaRC Three at Glades Condos Three at Paradise Condos Seven at Summit Condos 2 Route 124 Profile

Figure 2: Weekday Activity by Stop Route 124 Profile 3

Three at North Lynx Condos Five at Sugarbush Village In addition, four passengers board at various other locations. Saturdays Total Saturday ridership is over four times as high as weekday ridership. However, most of the increases are to locations that are served as regular stops, while boardings at the request stops are only marginally higher (see Figure 3): 146 at Lincoln Peak Four at Snow Creek/South Village Zero at Buffalo Bill s Resort One boards at West Hill House Six at SHaRC Eight at Glades Condos 18 at Paradise Condos 40 at Summit Condos 21 at North Lynx Condos Four at Sugarbush Village In addition, four passengers board at various other locations. Sundays Sunday ridership is nearly 60% of Saturday ridership, with similar boarding patterns (see Figure 4): 79 at Lincoln Peak Two at Snow Creek/South Village Zero at Buffalo Bill s Resort One boards at West Hill House Four at SHaRC Four at Glades Condos Seven at Paradise Condos 26 at Summit Condos 14 at North Lynx Condos Three at Sugarbush Village In addition, seven passengers board at various other locations. Ridership by Trip Weekdays Ridership by trip is low on all weekday trips, ranging from one to six passengers (see Figure 5). 4 Route 124 Profile

Figure 3: Saturday Activity by Stop Route 124 Profile 5

Figure 4 Sunday Activity by Stop 6 Route 124 Profile

4:00 AM 5:00 AM 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM Figure 5: Weekday Ridership by Trip 50 45 Boardings per Trip Inbound Outbound 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Not e: Aft ernoon demand response ridership is reported by t ime int ervals corresponding to when service would operate as fixed-route departures. Saturdays Weekend ridership is more heavily peaked toward the beginning and end of the ski day. On Saturdays, ridership per trip ranges from nine to 16 passengers per trip between 8 AM and 10 AM and between 12 and 21 passengers between 3 PM and 4:40 PM (see Figure 6). Ridership during the middle of the day ranges from five to 18 passengers. Sundays On Sundays, ridership per trip ranges from three to nine passengers per trip between 8 AM and 10:20 AM and between seven and 12 passengers between 3 PM and 4:40 PM (see Figure 6). Ridership during the middle of the day ranges from three to 10 passengers. Route 124 Profile 7

4:00 AM 5:00 AM 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 4:00 AM 5:00 AM 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM Figure 6: Saturday Ridership by Trip 50 45 Boardings per Trip Inbound Outbound 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Not e: Aft ernoon demand response ridership is reported by t ime int ervals corresponding to when service would operate as fixed-route departures. Figure 7: Sunday Ridership by Trip 50 45 Boardings per Trip Inbound Outbound 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Not e: Aft ernoon demand response ridership is reported by t ime int ervals corresponding to when service would operate as fixed-route departures. 8 Route 124 Profile

SERVICE PRODUCTIVITY Route 124 s productivity is highest on Saturdays, when the route averages 251 total passengers and 22.0 passengers per revenue service hours at a cost of $2.96 per passenger (see Table 2). On Sundays, the route averages 147 total passengers and 12.9 passengers per revenue service hour at a cost of $5.05 per passenger. On weekdays, the route averages 60 total passengers and 12.2 passengers per revenue service hour at a cost of $5.92 per passenger. The route exceeds VTrans Successful threshold for productivity on Saturdays and the Acceptable threshold on Sundays and weekdays. The route exceeds the Successful threshold for costeffectiveness on Saturdays and Sunday, but falls just short on weekdays. Table 2: Productivity Statistics MONDAY-FRIDAY SATURDAY SUNDAY Average Daily Ridership 60 251 147 Passengers/Revenue Service Hour 12.2 22.0 12.9 VTrans Successful Threshold 14.55 14.55 14.55 VTrans Acceptable Threshold 7.27 7.27 7.27 Passengers/Round Trip 5.0 20.9 12.3 Passengers/Revenue Vehicle Mile 1.9 3.3 1.9 Cost/Passenger $5.92 $2.96 $5.05 VTrans Successful Threshold $5.82 $5.82 $5.82 VTrans Acceptable Threshold $11.64 $11.64 $11.64 Source: Green Mountain Transit, May 2016; VTrans Performance Reviews (2016) SERVICE IMPROVEMENT OPTIONS Opportunities to strengthen Route 124 are listed below. Some suggestions may be contradictory, as there is usually more than one approach to improving a route. Provide All Service as Fixed-Route Service: Route 124 has a very unusual operating design in that it provides fixed-route service in the morning and demand response service in the afternoon even though there are no significant differences in demand by time of day. The route s operation would be much clearer to potential riders and more convenient (since reservations would not be required) if fixed-route service were provided throughout the day Break the Route in Two: Trips currently begin with service to request stops that, when served, take passengers traveling to locations along the northern portion of the route on a long detour. If the route were split into two, with one route serving the northern leg and the other serving the request stops on the southern leg, much more convenient service could be provided to most riders. Serve SHaRC as a Request Stop in Both Directions: SHaRC is currently served only on outbound trips, which requires a large amount of out of direction travel for inbound trips. Request service in both directions would make service more convenient. Serve SHaRC as a Regular Stop in Both Directions: Alternatively, SHaRC could be served as a regular stop in both directions. Route 124 Profile 9

Serve Sugarbush Village in Both Directions: Sugarbush Village is only served on inbound trips, which requires out of direction travel for outbound trips. Service in both directions would make service more convenient. 10 Route 124 Profile