Northshore School District 2018 Capital Bond Planning Task Force Meeting #6: March 9, 2017 AGENDA Minutes from 2/16/17 Review/Approve Growth Projects Update Building Condition Assessment Taking a deeper dive Small Group Discussion/Prioritization Activity
Bond Project Buckets Parameter on bond amount from School Board (Study Session 2/28/17) NO DECISION, JUST A PLANNING PARAMETER BOND TOTAL $200M? Growth Projects Building Improvement Projects New Projects Skyview/CC = $50M BCA Systems - $100M Addt l Fields?? Maltby Project = $150M Fields - $ IHS Theater?? or Technology - $ Other?? Maltby Phase 1 = $80M Security - $ Maltby Phase 2 = $84M Overhead/Bond Costs - $6M
Bond Project Buckets Parameter on bond amount from School Board (Study Session 2/28/17) NO DECISION, JUST A PLANNING PARAMETER BOND TOTAL $200M? Growth Projects Building Improvement Projects New Projects Skyview/CC = $50M BCA Systems - $100M Addt l Fields?? Maltby Project = $150M Fields - $ IHS Theater?? or Technology - $ Other?? Maltby Phase 1 = $80M Security - $ Maltby Phase 2 = $84M Overhead/Bond Costs - $6M
2016 EDTF Recommendation: Provide flexible capacity to accommodate continued growth and program access by constructing facilities at the Maltby site (capable of supporting 500 elementary and 700 middle school students) as well as a 24+ classroom wing at the Skyview/ Canyon Creek campus. Fund these projects using the 2018 bond for potential opening in fall of 2020 Board Approval of EDTF Recommendation: May 24, 2016
Skyview/Canyon Creek 39 total acres (K-5 and 6-8) Inside the Urban Growth Area Existing/occupied campus Centrally located to growth areas 30 classroom addition to support both CC and SJH Improvements to the site and common areas to support the enrollment at both sites Estimated $50M
King / Sno County Line Urban Growth Boundary SJH/CC Maltby Wellington 2017-2018 Elementary Boundaries Wellington: Pending acquisition - Currently under conditional contract to purchase
Skyview/Canyon Creek Site Plan
King / Sno County Line Urban Growth Boundary SJH/CC Maltby Wellington 2017-2018 Elementary Boundaries Wellington: Pending acquisition - Currently under conditional contract to purchase
NCHS FW CC/ SVMS
Maltby Property 2010 Property Purchase $5.8M 33 acres; 21 developable acres Outside the Urban Growth Area Multiple Jurisdictions: Snohomish County WA Dept. of Transportation Bonneville Power Olympic Pipeline Co. Alderwood Water District PSE
Maltby Site Plan Student Capacity: Elementary: 500 Students Middle: 700 Students Total: 1,200 Students Square Footage: Elementary: Middle: Total: 66,500 sf 111,512 sf 178,012 sf Parking: 219 stalls Site Acreage: 33 (12 = wetland + buffer) Total Project: ~$150M (if a single phase 2018 Bond) OR Phase 1 = $80M (2018 Bond) Phase 2 = $84M (2022 Bond?)
Bond Project Buckets Parameter on bond amount from School Board (Study Session 2/28/17) NO DECISION, JUST A PLANNING PARAMETER BOND TOTAL $200M? Growth Projects Building Improvement Projects New Projects Skyview/CC = $50M BCA Systems - $100M Addt l Fields?? Maltby Project = $150M Fields - $ IHS Theater?? or Technology - $ Other?? Maltby Phase 1 = $80M Security - $ Maltby Phase 2 = $84M Overhead/Bond Costs - $6M
2016 BCA 30-Year Replacement Cost Net Present Value ( like for like )
Potential Models for Data Sorting 1) Lifecycle or system needs in the bond cycle only Doesn t reflect any weighting or impact on school day 2) Poor ratings in the bond cycle only Seems simple it isn t Doesn t reflect any weighting or impact on school day 3) Poor + Fair ratings in the bond cycle only Doesn t reflect any weighting or impact on school day Fair rated system may not be reaching end of life in this bond cycle 4) Other prioritization parameters? (Group exercise)
BOND CYCLE NEED 2017 2018 2017 2018 2017 2018 2017 2017 2019 2019 2020 2021 2017-2021 2020 2021 2017-2021 2019 2020 2021 2017-2021 2018 2019 2020 2021 2017-2021 2018 2019 2020 2021 2017-2021 $97,706,857
$ 54,880,534 (Poor) 2016 BCA Bond Cycle Poor Ratings
$ 54,880,534 (Poor) $ 126,301,673 (Fair) 2016 BCA Bond Cycle Poor Ratings 2016 BCA Bond Cycle Fair Ratings
Small Group Exercise 1 - BCA Condition Ratings Small Group Exercise 2 - BCA Categories Small Group Exercise 3 - BCA Sub-categories
Building Condition Assessment Standardized Ratings: Excellent = Preventative maintenance only New or easily restorable to like new condition. Each score of Excellent is equivalent to 5 points towards the overall building score Good = Routine maintenance only Component aging but exhibits no damage. Each score of Good is equivalent to 4 points towards the overall building score. Fair = Minor repairs Minor component damage or repairs needed. Each score of Fair is equivalent to 3 points towards the overall building score. Poor = Requires major repairs Component is in need of major repairs, is not operating, or is close to the end of its expected useful life. Each score of Poor is equivalent to 2 points towards the overall building score. Unsatisfactory = Requires system replacement Major damage, complete failure, or in need of replacement. Each score of Unsatisfactory is equivalent to 1 point towards the overall building score
SITE Required Assessment Categories & Sub-categories STRUCTURE & ENVELOPE INTERIORS MEP & EQUIPMENT FURNISHINGS & FIXTURES LIFE SAFETY Grading/Drainage Foundation Interior Floors HVAC Millwork Fire Protection Playfields Exterior Doors Interior Walls Electrical Furniture Walkways/Parking Lots Siding & Finishes Interior Doors Landscaping Roofs/Gutters Lockers Plumbing Security Windows Interior Ceilings Fencing