How to Develop a Pedestrian Safety Action Plan

Similar documents
Designing for Pedestrian Safety

DESIGNING FOR PEDESTRIAN SAFETY. Module 1

Creating Complete Streets to Accommodate All Users

Built Environment Childhood Obesity Forum September 15, 2010

Pedestrian Safety. By Jerry Duke & Polly Carolin, FAICP for the Nevada Transportation Conference 2009

Transportation Planning Division

7 Complete Streets & Roadway Aesthetics

5/31/2016 VIA . Arwen Wacht City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards Blvd., 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811

6/22/2018 VIA . Darcy Goulart, Planning Manager City of Rancho Cordova Planning Department 2729 Prospect Park Drive Rancho Cordova, CA 95670

USDOT Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Initiative: Safer People and Safer Streets. Barbara McCann, USDOT Office of Policy

COWETA HIGH SCHOOL AND EAST HIGHWAY 51

Executive Summary Route 30 Corridor Master Plan

Prince George s County plans, policies, and projects

Illustrated Principles of Good Planning

REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

5/7/2013 VIA . RE: University Village Safeway Expansion (P13-019)

Pedestrians safety. ROAD SAFETY SEMINAR PIARC/AGEPAR/GRSP Lome, Togo October 2006 Lise Fournier, Canada-Qu

7/23/2017 VIA . Michael Hanebutt City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards Boulevard, 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811

12/4/2016 VIA . RE: Grocery Outlet Del Paso (DR16-328)

COMPLETE STREETS PLANNER S PORTFOLIO

Retrofitting Urban Arterials into Complete Streets

Transportation Planning Division

Approaches. Livable Neighborhood Design. Examples. Traditional neighborhood development. CE 594 University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee

6/14/2013 VIA . Evan Compton, Associate Planner Community Development Department City of Sacramento 300 Richards Blvd Sacramento, CA 95814

and Rural Multimodal Networks 2017 ALTA PLANNING + DESIGN

City of Novi Non-Motorized Master Plan 2011 Executive Summary

Streets. Safe for Pedestrians 20% 2nd 5,000. Are We People-Friendly?

6.4 RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS

PBIC Webinar. How to Create a Bicycle Safety Action Plan: Planning for Safety [IMAGE] Oct. 2, 2014, 2 pm

Designing for Pedestrians: An Engineering Symposium. Rutgers University March 21, 2013

RESOLUTION NO ?? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NEPTUNE BEACH ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Toward Zero Deaths. Regional SHSP Road Show Meeting. Virginia Strategic Highway Safety Plan. presented by

9/21/2016 VIA . RE: The Knot (DR16-270)

11/28/2016 VIA

Chapter 2: Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit

9/22/2014 VIA . RE: Butano Apartments Pre App (PAMP )

5 CIRCULATION AND STREET DESIGN

Land Use Patterns. Traditional Modern

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

3/10/2016 VIA th Street, Suite 203 Sacramento, CA

10/8/2014 VIA . RE: CVS Pharmacy (P13-002) Revised August 2014

This page intentionally left blank.

8/31/2016 VIA . RE: Freeport Arco Fuel Station (P16-039)

Chapter 5. Complete Streets and Walkable Communities.

Designing for Pedestrian Safety in Washington, DC

AMATS Complete Streets Policy

Multimodal Through Corridors and Placemaking Corridors

Pedestrian & Bicycle Safety Innovations & Applications

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

11/3/2014 VIA . WALKSacramento has reviewed the Stockton and T Mixed-Use project at 3675 T Street in the

San Jose Transportation Policy

Report. Typical Sections. City of Middleton, WI

Montford Drive Parking & Circulation Study

Access Management in the Vicinity of Intersections

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Vision

Why Zone In on Speed Reduction?

2014 Wisconsin Tribal Transportation Conference. Matt Halada Transportation Planner NE Region

Vision: Traditional hamlet with an attractive business/pedestrian friendly main street connected to adjacent walkable neighborhoods

G AT E WAY PLAN. Community BRIEFING KIT GATEWAY BIKE

Town of Babylon Sustainable Complete Streets Policy

Goodlettsville Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Executive Summary

CONNECTING PEOPLE TO PLACES

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

Toward Zero Deaths: Strategies for Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals

Albany Shaker Road Corridor Study Public Meeting # 2

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

10/30/2012 VIA

TOWN OF PORTLAND, CONNECTICUT COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Physical Implications of Complete Streets Policies

Does It Work? THE BENCHMARKING PROJECT. State Department of Transportation Project Assessment. Bill Wilkinson and Bob Chauncey

Municipal and School PROUD TO SERVE. Transportation Assistance

Intersection Improvement: Sturgeon Road, Silver Avenue and Murray Park Road Roundabout. Welcome. Public Information Session

Welcome. If you have any questions or comments on the project, please contact:

2015 Florida Main Street Annual Conference. Complete Streets Equal Stronger Main Streets

Living Streets Policy

Bicycle and Pedestrian Plans and Improvements

Perryville TOD and Greenway Plan

Pine Hills Road Pedestrian/Bicycle Safety Study Board of County Commissioners Work Session

Active Transportation Facility Glossary

A CHANGING CITY. of Edmonton, it is essential that it reflects the long-term vision of the City.

CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Solana Beach Comprehensive Active Transportation Strategy (CATS)

Road Diets: Reconfiguring Streets for Multi-Modal Travel

Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:

BETHEL ROAD AND SEDGWICK ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY

City of Wilsonville 5 th Street to Kinsman Road Extension Project

8/1/2018 VIA . Darcy Goulart City of Rancho Cordova Planning Department 2729 Prospect Park Drive Rancho Cordova, CA 95670

Broad Street Bicycle Boulevard Design Guidelines

M-58 HIGHWAY ACCESS MANAGEMENT STUDY Mullen Road to Bel-Ray Boulevard. Prepared for CITY OF BELTON. May 2016

THE ALAMEDA CONCEPT DESIGN COMMUNITY MEETING 3. A Plan for The Beautiful Way JANUARY 28, 2010

Dr. M.L. King, Jr. Street North Complete Streets Resurfacing Opportunities HOUSING, LAND USE, AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MARCH 22, 2018

4/14/2017 VIA . Miriam Lim, Junior Planner City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards, 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811

CONTEXT SENSITIVE STREETS STANDARDS COMMITTEE

DOWNTOWN MIAMI PEDESTRIAN PRIORITY ZONE

PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

The DC Pedestrian Master Plan

Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM

Prepared By: Town of Waxhaw Traffic Calming Policy

City of Vallejo Traffic Calming Toolbox

5. Pedestrian System. Accomplishments Over the Past Five Years

Transcription:

How to Develop a Pedestrian Safety Action Plan Course Introduction Presented by: Peter Eun FHWA RC Safety Engineer Ryan Snyder President, Ryan Snyder Associates, LLC Paul Zykofsky Director, Land Use and Transportation Programs, Local Government Commission April 26, 2011

Outcomes At the end of this series, you will be able to: Develop and implement a Pedestrian Safety Action Plan addressing your specific issues, problems, needs and resources Describe how pedestrians should be considered and provided for during the planning, design, work zone, maintenance, and operations phases. Describe how human behavior affects the interaction between pedestrians and drivers Identify good practices and effective solutions to enhance pedestrian safety and accessibility. 1-2

Series Overview The Big Picture The Why and Planning Factors Stakeholders Data Collection Data Analysis Enforcement Programs and Strategies Education Programs and Strategies Engineering Programs and Strategies Funding Policy Discussion: What potential policies and procedures are need to further enhance pedestrian safety and accessibility 1-3

Overview of Pedestrian Safety Problem Annually almost 5,000 pedestrians are killed in traffic crashes, representing about 12% of all traffic deaths. Nearly 70,000 pedestrians are injured each year Most crashes occur when the pedestrian crosses a road Most fatalities and serious injuries occur on roads designed with little attention for pedestrian safety. Pedestrians are rarely killed in walkable environments. 1-4

Pedestrian Fatalities by Year 1-5

Pedestrian Injuries by Year 1-6

Why is it important to accommodate pedestrian safety and accessibility? Because we are all pedestrians 1-8

Why? Because many people do not drive 1-9

Why? Because other modes depend on walking 1-10

Why? Because it s good for business people walk into stores 1-11

Why? Because pedestrians use and belong on streets and highways 1-12

Why? Because it s a healthy exercise 1-13

Why? Because it will make roads safer for all road users 1-14

Why? AASHTO: Because of the demands of vehicular traffic in congested areas, it is often extremely difficult to make adequate provisions for pedestrians. Yet this must be done, because pedestrians are the lifeblood of our urban areas (1994 edition, page 97) 1-15

Why? US Congressional Legislation/Policy of US DOT TEA-21 (1999): The non-motorized modes are an integral part of the mission of FHWA and a critical element of the local, regional, and national transportation system. mainstream bicycle and pedestrian projects into planning, design, and operation... bicycling and walking facilities will be incorporated into all transportation projects unless exceptional circumstances exist. Because it s the LAW!!! 1-16

Resources PBIC: www.walkinginfo.org FHWA: safety.fhwa.dot.gov NHTSA: nhtsa.dot.gov ITE: www.ite.org AASHTO/NCHRP: safety.transportation.org 1-17

Planning and street design elements that affect pedestrian safety: Land use Street connectivity Access management Site design Level of Service 1-18

Land Use 1-19

Why do we have cities? To minimize travel & maximize exchange (to be closer together) 1-20

How have we built our urban roadway system? To facilitate travel over longer distances 1-21

Reducing travel demand is best achieved changing Land Use policies that bring destinations closer together The problem: Commercial activities concentrated in auto-dominated corridors. School Segregated land uses Result: long travel distances, not conducive to walking 1-22

Reducing travel demand is best achieved changing Land Use policies that bring destinations closer together The problem: Commercial activities concentrated in auto-dominated corridors. Segregated land uses School Result: long travel distances, not conducive to walking Potential solutions? Allow small-scale retail in neighborhoods Create neighborhood parks Site school closer to residences & parks 1-23

Neo-traditional development: destinations are close to residential areas 1-24

Street Connectivity 1-25

<- 1 mile square -> <- 1 mile square -> 3 left turns! Connected Streets Lollipop pattern Connectivity creates a pedestrian-friendly street system by: Reducing walking distances; Offering more route choices, more quiet local streets; Dispersing traffic reducing reliance on arterials for all trips 1-26

Discussion Can you increase connectivity with paths, greenways? Reduces walking distances: YES Offers more route choices: YES Disperses traffic: NO <- 1 mile square -> Lollipop pattern 1-27

High Connectivity Travel Lanes Required Moderate Connectivity Low Connectivity 1-28

Lack of connectivity => few but large intersections 1-29

You live here, your child wants to visit a friend who lives not far away; how do you get there? Cul-de-sac patterns increase walking distances & increase reliance on arterials 1-30

You live here, your child wants to visit a friend who lives not far away; how do you get there? Cul-de-sac patterns increase walking distances & increase reliance on arterials 1-31

Land Use & Connectivity Schools next to parks. Dedicate R.O.W. to link cul-de-sacs with linear parks 1-32

Access Management Every driveway is a potential conflict 1-33

Drivers and pedestrians must make choices: Walk in front or in back? Pull forward or back up? 1-34

Access Management => fewer conflicts at driveways 2 techniques: (1) median (no left turns) (2) consolidate driveways (1) (2) 1-35

Which has greater crash reduction factor: (1) (2) (1) Median (no left turns) or (2) consolidate driveways? 1-36

Severing public streets not a desirable access management technique This limits people s ability to walk or bicycle 1-37

Connecting severed streets reestablishes walking routes 1-38

Severed street can be reconnected for pedestrians 1-39

Site Design 1-40

Bringing Buildings closer to the Street Creates a street where drivers know to expect pedestrians 1-41

Parking between sidewalk and building is not pedestrian-friendly 1-42

Building at back of walk: pedestrian-oriented design 1-43

Fast food typically favors drive-thru over walk-ins Pedestrians must cross drive-thru lane 1-44

Alternative design: Direct pedestrian access is provided with no vehicular conflicts 1-45

Parking and drive through are still provided 1-46

Cars enter back here Even a gas station / convenience store can be built with pedestrian friendly design at back of walk 1-47

Accessible Parking Space Store Ped Way Landscape Bulbout Sidewalk Pedway retrofitted from sidewalk to building through parking 1-48

Same principles apply to large-scale developments: Direct, safe & convenient access is provided 1-49

So desperate for parking, they cut down tree! Poor Design: Drivers use sidewalk for backing 1-50

Rethinking The Role of Urban Streets 1-51

A complete street accommodates many uses and provides for all purposes of a street: Mobility (all modes) Access to destinations Thriving businesses Beauty 1-52

Transforming a street 1-53

Narrow lanes; add bike lanes, median, trees, texture 1-54

Bring in buildings that face the street 1-55

More buildings: Infill 1-56

The street now has a life and is safer for pedestrians 1-57

These goals are achieved by local ordinances, which must be enforced. They are beyond the scope of road designers, yet contribute greatly to the safety, comfort and aesthetics of the walking experience. Do your local ordinances support pedestrian-oriented planning and design? 1-58

The impact of Level of Service (LOS) standards on street design and pedestrian safety 1-59

HCM says LOS = A; little traffic, no impediments Result: very wide roads that reduce pedestrian safety 1-60

A new ped LOS is needed to reflect quality of walking experience HCM says ped LOS = A; few people walking 1-61

A new ped LOS is needed to reflect quality of walking experience HCM says ped LOS = F; too many peds! 1-62

Why are pedestrians at high risk on this street? Multi-lane roadway, high speeds 1-63

Why are pedestrians are at low risk on this street? Narrow roadway, low speeds, busy 1-64

What is the core safety issue? Pedestrians and drivers must use the streets together 1-65

What does the driver see that says slow down, watch for pedestrians? On-street parking Narrow cross-section Buildings close to street Sidewalks Crosswalk People! 1-66

Reinventing the roadway: Transform a 5-lane commercial strip to 1-67

a safer road for everyone Discussion 1: What changed? Discussion 2: What didn t change? 1-68

Let s Recap Why is it important to accommodate pedestrian safety and accessibility? How does the street environment influence drivers and pedestrians expectations and interactions? Where is the information? What planning factors influence pedestrian safety and accessibility? 1-69

Questions 1-70