Nebraska National Forests and Grasslands Bessey Ranger District Motorized Trail Width Project

Similar documents
Engineering Report: Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests. Black Mesa Ranger District. Analysis of. National Forest System Roads (NFSRs) #s 504 & 169

Forest Service Travel Management Rule Status and Directives NOHVCC/NAOPM Conference Houston, TX March 26, 2009

Summary of Research RESULTS SAFETY TRAINING. Selected Results From a 2006 Survey of Registered Off-Highway Vehicle (OHV) Owners in Montana YES 44%

GATES, CATTLE GUARDS AND PASSAGEWAYS. This factsheet looks at various options for allowing passage through fences for livestock, wildlife and people.

'30"W '25"W 82 43'20"W 94B 94C 94C1 56 NOLICHUCKY

Memorandum. Exhibit 60 SSDP To: Jenny Bailey, Senior Planner. From: Bill Schultheiss, P.E. (WA. P.E. #46108) Date: June 20, 2017

Economic Contribution of Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation in Colorado. Executive Summary Season. A joint cooperation report

NOTICE OF 30-DAY OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT March 20, 2013

Active Transportation Facility Glossary

Description of Road Management Objectives, Existing Use, and Proposed Use:

Premier Outdoor Recreation

Gravel Bike Guide Haywood County

Setting Snares. Ohio Snaring Guide - 19

DRAFT. Table of Contents. Background

Rightsizing Streets: The Seattle Experience

Draft. Lecompton. Table of Contents. Background

IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES

Bicycling Routes on Provincial Roads Policy

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS. Transportation Improvements: Santa s Village Road (MR15) Public Meeting

SARDINIA BAY HORSE RIDERS ASSOCIATION. Code of Conduct Policy

Premier Outdoor Recreation

DATE: January 13, 2014 REPORT NO. CD TYPE OF REPORT: CONSENT ITEM [ ] ITEM FOR CONSIDERATION [ X ]

DECISION MEMO. Pursuant to 36 C.F.R (e), the following persons are exempted from this order:

Physical Implications of Complete Streets Policies

BASIC MOTOR SKILLS TESTING

September 7, November 29, PSI MVUM EIS Travel Management Team Pike & San Isabel National Forests 2840 Kachina Dr.

CYCLING TIME TRIALS The national governing body for CYCLING time trials

Pattullo Bridge Replacement Project Community Connections Phase 2 Consultation. Appendix 3: Open House Display Boards

FOREST SERVICE MANUAL NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS (WO) WASHINGTON, DC

Chapter 3 DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS

2014 USA Cycling Mt. Bike Marathon National Championships Operation Plan

Description of Road Management Objectives, Existing Use, and Proposed Use:

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

Bicyclist Signing Guidelines

FOREST SERVICE MANUAL NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS (WO) WASHINGTON, DC

900 BICYCLE FACILITIES Traffic Engineering Manual

City of Novi Non-Motorized Master Plan 2011 Executive Summary

CYCLING TIME TRIALS The national governing body for CYCLING time trials

File Code: 1950:2720 Date: March 21, Dear Interested Party,

Montgomery County Life Sciences Center Loop Trail

Building Code Guidelines For Home Pools

In the Interest of Safety: Transit Safety Slide Reference Guide

Gordon Proctor Director Policy on Accommodating Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel on ODOT Owned or Maintained Facilities

HURL ELKHORN 50K RUN AID STATIONS COURSE MARKINGS

Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:

DRAFT. Lecompton. Table of Contents. Background

Off-road Trails. Guidance

CITY OF TORONTO. BY-LAW No

TOWN OF PORTLAND, CONNECTICUT COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

The 2009 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) (Brief) Highlights for Arizona Practitioners. Arizona Department of Transportation

CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN P.O. Box 710. RECEIPT REQUESTED Tucson, AZ NUMBER:

Living Streets Policy

RESOLUTION NO ?? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NEPTUNE BEACH ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Gerald Desmond Bridge Replacement: The Severance of a Major Bicycling and Ped Route

TRAFFIC CALMING GUIDE FOR TORONTO CITY OF TORONTO TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVISION

CTDOT Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Initiatives

2.0 LANE WIDTHS GUIDELINE

Utah. North Stansbury Mountains Wilderness Study Area Site-Specific Monitoring Guide

CHEETAH PROJECT Cheetah Conservation Fund. Interviewers name Date

Parks and Recreation Committee Approval Date: January 22, 2018

Case 1:08-cv MEH-KMT Document Filed 01/15/2009 Page 2 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Chapter 11 Highway and Rural Driving

Medicine Bow Routt National Forest and Thunder Basin National Grassland; Routt. County; Colorado; Steamboat Ski Resort, Steamboat EIS

Beyond the Highway. Trails and trails. Tom Beekman, P.E. Northwest Regional Planning Chief Department of Transportation

Blue Ribbon Commission Report Recommendations on Pedestrian and Bicycle Infrastructure Improvements

Electric Bicycles (E-Bikes)

Clackamas County Comprehensive Plan

FOREST SERVICE HANDBOOK NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS (WO) WASHINGTON, DC

Goal 3: Foster an environment of partnerships and collaboration to connect our communities and regions to one another.

2012 Diamond Complex Assessment BLM administered: Battle Mountain, Ely, Elko districts

Chapter 2. Bellingham Bicycle Master Plan Chapter 2: Policies and Actions

FEE SCHEDULE POOL PERMIT FEES. Refundable Security (Cash of L.C.) 1 Hot Tub, Spa, etc. $ nil 2 Above Ground Pool $ nil

Homeowner s Safety Guidelines for Home Pools

WALCOOM. Walcoom Corporation FIELD FENCE.

RECREATIONAL FACILITIES HANDBOOK

MOUNTAIN BIKE ORIENTEERING RULES

PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY ISSUES

Safety Benefits of Raised Medians and Pedestrian Refuge Areas. FHWA Safety Program.

Bikeway action plan. Bicycle Friendly Community Workshop March 5, 2007 Rochester, MN

The 2012 AASHTO Bike Guide: An Overview

4. TRAIL DESIGN GUIDELINES

FOREST SERVICE MANUAL

FALL PROTECTION / ELEVATED WORK

What you need to know about. Swimming pool and spa safety barriers

River Road - Proposed Implementation of Selected Road Safety Measures

Beyond the Highway. Tale of the Trails. Tom Beekman, P.E. Northwest Regional Planning Chief Department of Transportation

SELECTED ROADWAY CAPACITY ANALYSIS

Building Code Guidelines For Home Pools

Tonight is for you. Learn everything you can. Share all your ideas.

ORANGE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS TRAFFIC INVESTIGATIONS

CHAPTER 2G. PREFERENTIAL AND MANAGED LANE SIGNS

The Corporation of the City of Sarnia. School Crossing Guard Warrant Policy

Bicycle Master Plan Goals, Strategies, and Policies

Sid Pulsford Walk. 175m. 33m. 1 hr 45 mins 4.1 km One way. Hard track 118m. Gosford LGA

Report to COUNCIL for decision

CYCLING. Scoutmaster Bucky. Merit Badge Workbook EXPLAIN TO YOUR COUNSELOR THE MOST LIKELY HAZARDS YOU MAY ENCOUNTER WORKBOOK INFORMATION

10.0 CURB EXTENSIONS GUIDELINE

STANLEY STREET December 19, 2017

HOLT MOUNTAIN RANCH GLENWOOD, NEW MEXICO 74.4 (15.7 IRRIGATED) DEEDED ACRES 15,722 USFS ACRES

Transcription:

Nebraska National Forests and Grasslands Bessey Ranger District Motorized Trail Width Project Purpose and Need The purpose of this project is to improve motorized recreational opportunities by allowing more UTVs on the Bessey Ranger District s designated motorized trail system. As such, there is a need for a change in motorized designation for the trails and for wider jump ups. Location This project is located on the Bessey Ranger District throughout the Dismal River ATV trail system as shown on attached map. Existing Condition The motorized trails in the Bessey Ranger District are designated as open to vehicles 50 wide or less. This designation was originally made in 2009 during implementation of the Travel Management Rule. At that time, ATVs and UTVs were commonly within that size, and fewer UTVs were produced and sold than are today. In 3, the district revised its motorized designations, but did not propose any changes to the allowable vehicle width on the motorized trails. Since 2009, the technology for off-highway vehicles has advanced. Manufacturers have developed wider UTVs, which are increasingly popular. On weekends, approximately 30 percent of the vehicles at the district are UTVs. UTVs are safer for transporting young children and easier and less physical to drive than ATVs. The footprint of the district s motorized trails are already wide enough to accommodate larger vehicles (Figure 1). Figure 1: A 60-inch wide UTV easily fits on the existing trail. Page 1 of 5

The jump-ups are the places where motorized trails cross the fencelines of livestock grazing allotments. The district has ten jump-ups. The metal jump-ups allow off-highway vehicles to cross but serve as cattle guards for livestock. The jump-ups are 52 inches wide so that vehicles 50 inches or less can pass (Figure 2). Figure 2: A 60-inch wide UTV cannot fit through the existing jump-ups. Gates exist at six of the ten of the jump-ups. Figure 3 shows a jump-up (at right), sized for vehicles 50 inches or less, and a gate (at left), used for emergency vehicles and cattle. Figure 3: A gate and a jump-up. Page 2 of 5

When cattle are not grazing on the forest, district staff leave the gates open so that off-highway vehicles can drive through it. When livestock are on the forest, the district has had to lock the gates to keep people from using them. Riders frequently leave the gates open, which results in cattle roaming in areas where they are not supposed to be. Sometimes, when riders encounter places they cannot pass, they take matters into their own hands. District staff regularly need to repair cut fences (Figure 4) and posts that have been removed so that wider vehicles can pass (Figures 5, 6). Sometimes people take another way out, and end up driving illegally down State Spur 86B, which is dangerous. Figure 4: The fence at the right of the photo was cut to allow wider vehicles to pass. Figure 5: The tracks shown are from a 60-inch UTV and it would not fit through the opening. Page 3 of 5

Figure 6: Someone winched the post out of the ground so that a wider vehicle could fit through. Desired Condition The following desired conditions are taken from the 2009 Land and Resource Management Plan (LRMP) for the Nebraska National Forests and Grasslands: Goal 2.a: Improve the capability of the Nation's forests and grasslands to provide diverse, high-quality outdoor recreation opportunities. Objectives: 6. Provide nonmotorized and motorized trails for a wide variety of uses and experiences. 7. Manage trail systems to minimize conflicts among users (LRMP, p. 1-4). Goal 4.a, Objective 1: Within 5 years, identify travel opportunities and restrictions, including designating motorized travelways and areas, to meet land management objectives. Provide reasonable access for use of the national grasslands and national forests (LRMP, p. 1-8). Infrastructure Use and Management, Guidelines: 7. As opportunities allow, install gates along all existing fences at intervals to provide reasonable access. 8. Install all gates so they are easily opened and closed by all users. 9. Install cattle guards or hinged metal gates on popular and designated travel routes (LRMP, p. 1-30). The 2005 Travel Management Rule defines a trail as follows: Trail. A route 50 inches or less in width or a route over 50 inches wide that is identified and managed as a trail. (36 CFR 212.1) Page 4 of 5

Proposed Action To meet the purpose and need, the Forest Service proposes the following. 1) Issue a special designation to allow vehicles 64 inches or less on the existing motorized trails. The special designation would appear on the next printed and electronic versions of the MVUM (motor vehicle use map), anticipated in 7. The special designation would apply to all the trails currently designated for vehicles 50-inches wide or less (see attached map). 2) Replace the ten existing jump ups with wider, dome shaped ones. In addition to accommodating vehicles up to 64-inches wide, the dome shape allows for safer travel. The current jump-ups have sharp angles that sometimes cause people to tip over backwards. Replacing a jump-up involves digging the existing one out and setting the new one on the ground. The posts holding the fence and the gates need to be dug out and moved. 3) Install 10-foot panel gates next to the jump-ups to replace gap gates where they exist, which will allow for easier access in rescue situations, trail maintenance and repair, and livestock crossing. 4) Cut trees where needed to ensure that vehicles 62-inches can pass (Figure 7). Figure 7: An example of a place where a tree would be cut to allow a wider vehicle to pass. Categorical Exclusion We anticipate this project will be categorically excluded from documentation in an environmental assessment or an environmental impact statement under the following category: (1) Construction and reconstruction of trails. (36 CFR 220.6 (e)(1)) This category is appropriate because the trails already exist and are physically wide enough to accommodate vehicles up to 64 inches. The trails are already designated for motorized use; this would simply change the width of vehicle allowed. Page 5 of 5

Motorized Trail Width Proposal of 64" - Bessey Ranger District Legend 212N % Scott Lookout Tower Powerline Trail 113 Spur 86B 117 31 223 136 Dismal River Trail 112 Bessey Recreation Complex Halsey Forest System Roads Roads Open to All Vehicles Roads Open to Highway Legal Vehicles Only Roads Open to Highway Legal Vehicles Only, Seasonal State or US Highway ATV Trails proposed to 64" 212S 165 168 25 47 166 187 219 Hill Climb 69 202 105 212S 169 209 106 Poison Ivy Trail 114 Dismal River Trail 112 150 214 56 188 Fenceline Trail 115 171 55 214 108 74 70 81 263 229 226 118 121 79 162 224 119 216 189 230 214 224 277 Dismal River Trail 112 76 120 Whitetail Campground ² An official Motor Vehicle Use Map (MVUM) is available at the Bessey Ranger District office and online at www.nebnationalforest.com. It contains all the rules regarding motorized travel. This map features the motorized trails and areas only.