Formation level = m. Foundation level = m. Height of the wall above the Ground Level = 7.42 m

Similar documents
DESIGN OF AXIALLY LOADED STEPPED FOOTING DATA :- SBC of soil =200 KN /m 2 Concrete Mix =M20 Steel Grade = Fe 415 Clear cover of bottom slab =50 mm

Reinforced Soil Retaining Walls-Design and Construction

UNIT-I SOIL EXPLORATION

INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING (Autonomous) Dundigal, Hyderabad

For a cantilever pile wall shown in Figure 1, assess the performance of the system and answer the following questions.

INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING (Autonomous) Dundigal, Hyderabad CIVIL ENGINEERING TUTORIAL QUESTION BANK

Displacement-based calculation method on soil-pile interaction of PHC pipe-piles

9000 KL CLEAR WATER SUMP DESIGN IN WATER TREATMENT PLANT

DESIGN OF ELEVATED SERVICE RESERVOIR

computed using Equation 3-18 by setting the 2nd term equal to 0 and K A equal to K o and using the pressure distribution as shown in Figure 3-23.

RULES FOR CLASSIFICATION Ships. Part 3 Hull Chapter 5 Hull girder strength. Edition October 2015 DNV GL AS

Submerged Slope with Excess Pore- Water Pressure

Theory of a vertically loaded Suction Pile in CLAY

TECHNICAL CIRCULAR. Circular No: S-P 32/13 Revision: 1 Page: 1 of 7 Date:

RULES FOR CLASSIFICATION. Ships. Part 3 Hull Chapter 5 Hull girder strength. Edition January 2017 DNV GL AS

FLEXIBLE AND RELIABLE ANCHORING

REPORT GEO-TECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR THE PROPOSED BLOCK-7 SUB-STATION SY NO-225, NEAR RAYACHERLU VILLAGE

CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Structure, Member Design - Geotechnics Pile Cap XX

REPORT GEO-TECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR THE PROPOSED BLOCK-1 SUB-STATION SY NO-44, NEAR KYATAGANACHERLU VILLAGE

2 Available: 1390/08/02 Date of returning: 1390/08/17 1. A suction cup is used to support a plate of weight as shown in below Figure. For the conditio

Journal of Civil & Environmental

Verdura 40/60 Retaining Wall Feasibility Design and Response to Plan Review Comments from City of Lake Forest

Tension Cracks. Topics Covered. Tension crack boundaries Tension crack depth Query slice data Thrust line Sensitivity analysis.

STABILITY OF MULTIHULLS Author: Jean Sans

COMPFIRE CCFT-FP_550_55_ September 2010 Fin Plate Connection to Circular Concrete-Filled Tube Test Result

SOLUTIONS TO TUTORIAL EXAMPLES CHAPTER 13

SOIL ANCHORS ETSAB/UPC J.Llorens - ETSAB/UPC PASSIVE ANCHORS - ANTECEDENTS

u 1 u 3 u 2 characteristic bearing capacity / γ Gr

Ground Failure Mechanism of Micoropiled-raft

Verdura 40/60 Retaining Wall Feasibility Design and Response to Plan Review Comments from City of Lake Forest

CIVL473 Fundamentals of Steel Design

Vertical Uplift Capacity of a Group of Equally Spaced Helical Screw Anchors in Sand

Typical factors of safety for bearing capacity calculation in different situations

LAMINATED POLES. engineered to solve problems. Coastal Douglas-fir. Field Raked and Tangent Poles

Irrigation &Hydraulics Department lb / ft to kg/lit.

On the Use of Pickets and Flukes as Snow Anchors

COST EFFECTIVE STRUCTURAL FORMS FOR SWIMMING POOLS

Department of Civil & Geological Engineering GEOE Engineering Geology

Level 3 Cambridge Technical in Engineering 05822/05823/05824/05825/05873 Unit 3: Principles of mechanical engineering

TZ WEDGE ANCHOR FOR CRACKED AND UNCRACKED CONCRETE

Snow load on structures: case studies on cableway masts and measures against snow gliding

Pushover Analysis of Water Tank Staging

Yasuyuki Hirose 1. Abstract

25 year warranty! Columns Are Available in Common Sizes: Widths: 3-1/2, 5-7/16, 5-1/2 and 7 Depths: 3-1/2, 5-1/2 and 7

HARD COPY UNCONTROLLED Ergon Energy Corporation Ltd ABN

Homework of chapter (3)

SPIDER ONLINE-TOOL - The dimensioning tool for the SPIDER Rock Protection System SPIDER S3-130

Tutorial 5 Relative equilibrium

19.1 Problem: Maximum Discharge

Truss Analysis Method of Sections Steven Vukazich San Jose State University

Effect of Wind Pressure on R.C Tall Buildings using Gust Factor Method

SPECIAL FOOTINGS AND BEAMS ON ELASTIC FOUNDATIONS

This document downloaded from vulcanhammer.net vulcanhammer.info Chet Aero Marine

Stability of Pipeline and details of Anchor blocks

FC-CIV HIDRCANA: Channel Hydraulics Flow Mechanics Review Fluid Statics

Ship Stability. Ch. 8 Curves of Stability and Stability Criteria. Spring Myung-Il Roh

[Barve, 4(7): July, 2015] ISSN: (I2OR), Publication Impact Factor: 3.785

RULES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND CLASSIFICATION OF SHIPS IDENTIFIED BY THEIR MISSIONS CHAPTERS SCOPE

Ship Stability September 2013 Myung-Il Roh Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering Seoul National University

fischer Epoxy Mortar FIS EB The basic epoxy mortar for applications in concrete

COURSE NUMBER: ME 321 Fluid Mechanics I Fluid statics. Course teacher Dr. M. Mahbubur Razzaque Professor Department of Mechanical Engineering BUET

AE Dept., KFUPM. Dr. Abdullah M. Al-Garni. Fuel Economy. Emissions Maximum Speed Acceleration Directional Stability Stability.

JSEE. Slope Stability and Bearing Capacity of Footings on Top of Slopes Under Repeated Dynamic Loads. 1. Introduction

fischer Epoxy Mortar FIS EB

PhysicsAndMathsTutor.com

Concave and Flat Expander Anti-Wrinkle Rollers:

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, IIT BOMBAY CE306 STRUCTURAL MECHANICS III

FLUID MECHANICS Time: 1 hour (ECE-301) Max. Marks :30

Vessel Weighing. Load Cells and Weigh Modules VPG TRANSDUCERS. Technical Note VPGT-06. Scope. Accuracy. Mode of Operation. Mechanical Considerations

STEEL VESSELS UNDER 90 METERS (295 FEET) IN LENGTH 2018

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Small craft Hull construction and scantlings Part 8: Rudders

Bearing Capacity and Settlement Response of PMS Tanks on Cohesionless Soil Lithology in Lekki, Lagos of Nigeria

LYSAGHT W-DEK. Design and Construction Manual. Structural steel decking system

CENGRS GEOTECHNICA PVT. LTD. Job No Sheet No. 1

FLUID MECHANICS. Fluid Statics BUOYANCY. Fig. Buoyancy CENTER OF BUOYANCY

DESIGN OF BELL-MOUTH SPILLWAY AT BARVI DAM

NPCA Buoyancy White Paper

Sample Project with EPB TBM according to DIN 4085

Benefits. caused by overloading Quick. tester. ons. Applicati HAP 1.15 HAP safety. shackle. After activation safety shackle.

Assistant Lecturer Anees Kadhum AL Saadi

Q Pearson Education, Inc.

m v = 1.04 x 10-4 m 2 /kn, C v = 1.29 x 10-2 cm 2 /min

NORDEX. Foundations. Nordex N117/3000

Research on Shear Test methods of bonded steel bolts

Hydrostatics and Stability Dr. Hari V Warrior Department of Ocean Engineering and Naval Architecture Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur

Spider Rock Protection System for Rock Slope Stabilization

DNVGL-RP-E303 Edition April 2017

5. A bead slides on a curved wire, starting from rest at point A in the figure below. If the wire is frictionless, find each of the following.

The ends. I x. Wall thickness mm B087 87/ B /

Prof. B V S Viswanadham, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

3. Types of foundation

S0300-A6-MAN-010 CHAPTER 2 STABILITY

AP Physics 1 Lesson 4 Homework Outcomes Quiz 4 Preparation. Name. Date. Period

Pushover analysis with ZSOIL taking soil into account. Stéphane Commend GeoMod Ing. SA, Lausanne

Phô lôc 11. týnh to n sµn liªn hîp tçng 1

58' EL :1 5' BC-1 STA CONSTRUCT TRIPLE 5' X 3' CONCRETE BOX CULVERT FL LT 59.0 FL RT 59.3 DESIGN STANDARD 289

TYPES OF FOUNDATION. Superstructure. Substructure. Foundation


Site-Specific Assessment of Jack-Ups Part 1: Jack-Up Basics & Why We Do Site-Specific Assessments

Hatch cover securing and tightness

Transcription:

DESIGN OF RETAINING WALL INTRODUCTION: This wall is designed for active earth pressure and live load surcharge pressure The loads for the purpose of design are calculated per meter length of wall. BASIC DESIGN: Formation level = 100.72 m Foundation level = 91.80 m Height of the wall above the Ground Level = 7.42 m Depth of foundation below Ground level = 1.50 m Slope of surcharge is = 0.00 degree Safe bearing capacity = 200.00 kn/m 2 MATERIALS: Grade of concrete = M 25 Permissible flexural compressive stress σcbc = 8.333 N/mm 2 modular ratio m = = 10 for roads, means of IS [ 280/3σcbc ] Neutral axis depth factor n = (1/(1+(200/(10*8.333))) = 0.294 Leverarm factor j = (1-0.294/3) = 0.902 Moment resistance factor Q = (0.5*0.294*0.902*8.333) = 1.105 N/mm 2 Maximum shear stress = 1.90 N/mm 2 from code Clear cover to the reinforcement = 50 mm Clear cover to footing reinforcement = 75 mm Density of concrete = 24 kn/mm 3 Development length factor Ld = 46 Ø Grade of steel = Fe 415 Tension in flexure, shear or combined bending σ st = 200 N/mm 2 Back Fill : Angle of slope of the embankment or backfill β = 0 degree Angle of internal friction φ = 30 degree Angle of internal friction soil to soil δ = 20 degree Inclination of wall with respect to vertical α = 7 degree

Cohesion c = 0.000 kn/m 2 Density of earth γ = 18.000 kn/m 3 Density of water γ W = 10.000 kn/m 3 Coefficient of active earth pressure in horizontal direction LOADS : Ka = = cos 2 α [1+ ( sin (φ + δ) cos (φ β))] 2 ( cos (α + δ) cos (α β)) Active earth pressure at bottom of footing level = K a γ h = 49.332 kn/m 2 Due to live load surcharge = (0.307*18*1.2) = 6.637 kn/m 2 Depth of potensial tension crack due to cohesion "z" = 0.000 m - 2c/(γ(K a )0.5) Live load surcharge = 1.20 m of back fill cos 2 (φ α) 0.307 0.30 3.90 0.00 Active Earth Pressure Liveload Surcharge 7.42 a B A 2.75 7.72 15.209 GL C 1.50 F E b e c f d D 2.60 1.200 3.00 49.332 6.637 6.80 Toe slab Heel slab 4.97 0.50 1.20 42.696 191.216 165.53 146.73 126.19 1.10 93.67 74.86 1.10

DESIGN OF STEM: Top straight portion of the stem Dry condition: Force due to active earth pressure = (0.5*15.209*2.75) = 20.912 kn Lever arm = (0.42*2.75) = 1.155 m Bending moment = (20.912*1.155) = 24.154 kn.m Force due to surcharge = (6.637*2.75) = 18.251 kn Lever arm = (2.750*0.5) = 1.375 m Bending moment = (18.251*1.375 = 25.095 kn.m Total Design BM = (25.095+24.154) = 49.249 kn.m Design BM = 49.249 kn.m d, Required = (SQRT((49.249*1000000/(1.105*1000))) = 211.080 mm d, Provided = (0.3*1000)-50-16-8 = 226.000 mm SAFE Ast Required = (49.249*1000000/(200*0.902*226)) = 1208.00 mm 2 Minimum steel required is = 0.12% = 360.00 mm 2 Providing tor 16 @ 125 mm Steel provided = 1608.50 mm 2 SAFE Base of the stem: Dry condition: Force due to active earth pressure = 0.5*42.696*7.72 = 164.81 kn Lever arm = (0.42*7.72) = 3.242 m Bending moment = (164.806*3.242) = 534.37 kn.m Force due to surcharge = (6.637*7.720) = 51.235 kn Lever arm = (7.720*0.5) = 3.860 m Bending moment = (51.235*3.860) = 197.77 kn.m Total Design BM = (197.767+534.366) = 732.13 kn.m Design BM = 732.13 kn.m d, Required = (SQRT((732.132*1000000/(1.105*1000))) = 813.853 mm d, Provided = (1.2*1000)-50-25-12.5 = 1112.50 mm SAFE Ast Required = (732.132*1000000/(200*0.902*1112.5)) = 3648.1 mm 2

Minimum steel required is = 0.12% = 1440.00 mm 2 Providing tor 25 @ 125 mm + tor 0 @ 125 mm Steel provided = 3926.991 mm 2 SAFE CHECKING BASE PRESSURE : For checking the base pressure all the loads acting on the base slab are calculated about TOE of th base slab. The load calculations are listed in following table. Force and BM due to active earth pressure are considered as -ve for sign convention purpose. S.no. Description Load in KN Load in kn Lever V H arm in BM in kn.m 1 Active earth pressure 220.02 3.75-824.3 2 Liveload surcharge 59.20 4.46-264.0-1088.3 Vertical component due to 3 Active earth pressure 105.28 2.900 305.33 4 Vertical comp. of live load surcharge 28.33 2.900 82.15 5 Earth weight A 416.88 5.300 2209.46 B 44.55 3.350 149.24 C 2.24 0.967 2.16 D 18.90 5.800 109.62 Wt.of earth on toe E 16.38 0.867 14.20 F 14.04 1.300 18.25 6 Self weight of wall a 55.58 2.750 152.86 b 53.68 3.200 171.76 c 20.16 3.200 64.51 d 81.60 3.400 277.44 e 21.84 1.733 37.86 f 25.20 4.800 120.96 3715.80 Sum of P = 904.66 kn Net BM = 2627.48 kn.m Sum of H = 279.221 kn Self weight of wall = 258.060 kn Eccentricity = e(=b/2 - M/V) = 0.496 m SAFE Check for base pressure Maximum (P/A + Pe/Z) = 191.216 kn/m 2 SAFE Minimum (P/A - Pe/Z) = 74.860 kn/m 2 SAFE

CHECK FOR STABILITY Stability against Sliding Total Vertical load = 904.659 kn Total Horizontal load = 279.221 kn Tanφ = 0.577 Factor of safety against sliding = 1.871 >1.5 SAFE Stability against Overturning Restoring moment RM = 3715.8 kn.m Overturning moment is due to earth pressure OM = 1088.3 kn.m Factor of safety against Overturning (RM / OM) = 3.414 >2 SAFE DESIGN OF TOE SLAB: BM due to base pressure = 596.2 kn.m BM due to self weight of slab = 135.20 kn.m BM due to weight of earth on toe = 46.64 kn.m Total BM = 414.34 kn.m Design BM acting on the Toe slab = 414.34 knm Effective depth requireddreq = 612.25 mm Providing overall depth as = 1200.0 mm Effective depth provided = 1099.0 mm SAFE Steel required = 2089.99 mm 2 Minimum steel required is 0.12% = 1440.00 mm 2 Providing tor 20 @ 100 mm C/C = 3141.59 mm 2 SAFE Check for Shear: Critical section at a distance (eff. depth) i.e. = 1099.00 mm from the face of the support: Overall depth provided = 0.904 m Effective depth = 819.12 mm Due to base pressure = 267.740 kn Due to self weight of slab = -25.291 kn Total shear at c = 242.449 kn

BM due to base pressure = 205.76 kn.m BM due to self wt. of slab = 16.460 kn.m BM at c = -189.30 kn.m Design shear (V±M tanb/d) = 186.078 kn Shear stress τ = (V±M tanb/d)/bd τ = 0.227 SAFE 100 As/bd = 0.286 Permissible Shear stress in concrete with out shear steel = 0.244 N/mm2 Hence Shear Reinforcement is NOT required. DESIGN OF HEEL SLAB BM due to base pressure = 413.87 kn.m BM due to self weight of slab = 79.200 kn.m BM due to weight of earth on Heel = 227.34 kn.m Total BM = 107.33 kn.m Design BM acting on the Heel slab = 107.33 kn.m Effective depth requireddreq = 311.61 mm Providing overall depth as = 1200.0 mm Effective depth provided = 1103.0 mm SAFE Steel required = 539.4 mm 2 Minimum steel required is 0.12% = 1440.00 mm 2 Providing tor 16 @ 125 mm C/C = 1608.495 mm 2 SAFE Check for Shear: The slab is checked for shear at face of the support = 195.400 kn Tan of Angle between top and bottom edges of the heel slab = 0.233 Design shear force considering the effect of slope of the slab = 172.695 kn Shear stress = 0.157 N/mm 2 100 As/bd = 0.146 Permissible Shear stress in concrete with out shear steel = 0.188 N/mm 2 Hence Shear Reinforcement is NOT required.