WIND FORCES ACTING ON INFLATABLE AMUSEMENT PRODUCTS AND CRITICAL WIND SPEEDS CAUSING ACCIDENTS

Similar documents
Yasuyuki Hirose 1. Abstract

INTERFERENCE EFFECTS OF TWO BUILDINGS ON PEAK WIND PRESSURES

SIMULATION OF THE FLOW FIELD CHARACTERISTICS OF TRANSIENT FLOW

DEVELOPMENT OF SAFE VERTICAL AXIS WIND TURBINE

EFFECTS OF SIDEWALL OPENINGS ON THE WIND LOADS ON PIPE-FRAMED GREENHOUSES

THREE DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURES OF FLOW BEHIND A

A Wind-Tunnel Study of a Cubic Rooftop AC Unit on a Low Building

The Study on the Influence of Gust Wind on Vehicle Stability Chen Wang a, Haibo Huang b*, Shaofang Xu c

UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG LIBRARY. Hong Kong Collection

DYNAMICS PROBLEM SOLVING

CIVL473 Fundamentals of Steel Design

NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF STATIC INTERFERENCE EFFECTS FOR SINGLE BUILDINGS GROUP

Physics 11 Unit III Practice Test Projectile Motion. Instructions: Pick the best answer available in Part A and Show all your work for Part B

6.6 Gradually Varied Flow

CRITERIA OF BOW-DIVING PHENOMENA FOR PLANING CRAFT

SOFTWARE. Sesam user course. 12 May 2016 HydroD Hydrostatics & Stability. Ungraded SAFER, SMARTER, GREENER DNV GL 2016

Name: SOLUTIONS MIDTERM 2, Spring 2019

Wind loads investigations of HAWT with wind tunnel tests and site measurements

SCREENING OF TOPOGRAPHIC FACTOR ON WIND SPEED ESTIMATION WITH NEURAL NETWORK ANALYSIS

Biomechanics Sample Problems

The table below shows how the thinking distance and braking distance vary with speed. Thinking distance in m

EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH ON THE MECHANICAL SOLICITATIONS OF THE GREENHOUSES OF VEGETABLES AND FLOWERS LOCATED ON ROOFTOPS

PYP 001 First Major Exam Code: Term: 161 Thursday, October 27, 2016 Page: 1

ESTIMATION OF THE DESIGN WIND SPEED BASED ON

ASCE D Wind Loading

AERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF SPIN PHENOMENON FOR DELTA WING

INTERACTION BETWEEN WIND-DRIVEN AND BUOYANCY-DRIVEN NATURAL VENTILATION Bo Wang, Foster and Partners, London, UK

1) What is the magnitude of the momentum of a kg baseball traveling at 45.0 m/s?

Physics terms. coefficient of friction. static friction. kinetic friction. rolling friction. viscous friction. air resistance

Chapter 6. You lift a 10 N physics book up in the air a distance of 1 meter at a constant velocity of 0.5 m/s. The work done by gravity is

Physics P201 D. Baxter/R. Heinz

DESIGN OF BELL-MOUTH SPILLWAY AT BARVI DAM

Available online at Procedia Engineering 00 2 (2010) (2009)

A Study on Roll Damping of Bilge Keels for New Non-Ballast Ship with Rounder Cross Section

Friction properties of the face of a hand-held tennis racket

1. Which one of the following is a vector quantity? A. time B. speed C. energy D. displacement

Introduction. Geomembrane lining systems are used in a variety of different applications. Landfill Lining Landfill Capping Salt Piles Lagoons / Ponds

PHYSICS 12 NAME: Kinematics and Projectiles Review

Implementing Provisions for Art. 411 of the ICR Ski Jumping

Wind Tunnel Study on the Structural Stability of a Container Crane According to the Boom Shape

LOAD CHARTS RT890E METRIC DIN / ISO / 75%

DATA EQUATIONS MATH ANSWER

STABILITY OF MULTIHULLS Author: Jean Sans

A Study on the Distribution of the Peak Wind Pressure Coefficient for the Wind Resistant Design of Rooftop Hoardings in High-rise Buildings

Volume 2, Issue 5, May- 2015, Impact Factor: Structural Analysis of Formula One Racing Car

LOAD CHARTS RT540E 85% STABILITY ON OUTRIGGERS 75% STABILITY ON RUBBER

5. A bead slides on a curved wire, starting from rest at point A in the figure below. If the wire is frictionless, find each of the following.

NAME:... SCHOOL: LINEAR MOTION. Answer ALL questions in this paper in the spaces provided.

130 William Street New York, NY, USA

Study on Marine Propeller Running in Bubbly Flow

WAVE LOAD ACTING ON HORIZONTAL PLATE DUE TO BORE

Homework #10 Due Monday, May Compute the moment of inertia of the objects below.

Reinforced Soil Retaining Walls-Design and Construction

Instructor: Biswas/Ihas/Whiting PHYSICS DEPARTMENT PHY 2053 Exam 1, 120 minutes October 14, 2009

Physics: Principles and Applications, 6e Giancoli Chapter 3 Kinematics in Two Dimensions; Vectors. Conceptual Questions

External Pressure Coefficients on Saw-tooth and Mono-sloped Roofs

Calculate the size of the force(s) acting on Sarah just after the take- off, in position 2 in the above diagram.

Appendix : Categorization Task. Instructions

Cooling performance of Persian wind towers

Figure 1. The distance the train travels between A and B is not the same as the displacement of the train.

Cutnell/Johnson Physics

Study by numerical simulations on the breathing effect in a semi-underground highway with beams and a roof above it

A STUDY ON FACTORS RELATED TO THE CAPSIZING ACCIDENT OF A FISHING VESSEL RYUHO MARU No.5

Numerical Analysis of Wind loads on Tapered Shape Tall Buildings

A tennis player hits a ball at a height of 2.4 m. The ball has an initial horizontal velocity.

HOW FAST/FAR DOES FLY LINE FALL? N. Perkins of the University of Michigan, March 2003

PHYSICS REVIEW SHEET 2010 MID-TERM EXAM

x 2 = (60 m) 2 + (60 m) 2 x 2 = 3600 m m 2 x = m

NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF WIND INTERFERENCE EFFECT

ANNUAL OF NAVIGATION 6/2003

A NOVEL FLOATING OFFSHORE WIND TURBINE CONCEPT: NEW DEVELOPMENTS

AIR BEARINGS IN HIGH PRECISION SYSTEMS

TESTING APPLICATION STANDARD (TAS)

Procedia Engineering 00 2 (2010) (2009) Properties of friction during the impact between tennis racket surface and ball

The Industrial Accident Resulted from the Failure of Bolt

SUPERMETRO - Super-High-Speed-Train in Low Pressure Tunnel

Technical Briefing Note

PRESSURE FLUCTUATIONS ACTING ON A TAPERED TALL BUILDING

LOCALLY CONCENTRATED SEVERE BEACH EROSION ON SEISHO COAST CAUSED BY TYPHOON T0709

Detailed study 3.4 Topic Test Investigations: Flight

Physics 8, Fall 2017, Homework #5. Due at start of class on Friday, October 13, 2017

BROCK UNIVERSITY. Name: Student #: Page 1 of 12

A computational study on structural barrier to vertical spread of window spill plume along building exterior façade under external wind

DAMAGE TO STORAGE TANKS CAUSED BY THE 2011 TOHOKU EARTHQUAKE AND TSUNAMI AND PROPOSAL FOR STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENT METHOD FOR CYLINDRICAL STORAGE TANKS

GROVE MODEL RT58D - 20 TON CAPACITY

CHAPTER 1. Knowledge. (a) 8 m/s (b) 10 m/s (c) 12 m/s (d) 14 m/s

Irrigation &Hydraulics Department lb / ft to kg/lit.

Project 1 Those amazing Red Sox!

CHAPTER 9 PROPELLERS

Aerodynamic behavior of a discus

6. What net external force is required to give a 25 kg suitcase an acceleration of 2.2 m/s2 to the right? Draw a free-body diagram of the suitcase.

SPECTRAL CHARACTERISTICS OF FLUCTUATING WIND LOADS ON A SEPARATE TWIN-BOX DECK WITH CENTRAL SLOT

Aerodynamic Analysis of a Symmetric Aerofoil

DESIGN AND CHARACTERISTICS OF A LARGE BOUNDARY- LAYER WIND TUNNEL WITH TWO TEST SECTIONS

Aerodynamic Performance of Trains with Different Longitudinal Section Lines under Crosswind

Page 2. Indicate with ticks ( ) in the table below which of the quantities are vectors and which are scalars. Velocity Speed Distance Displacement

CHAPTER 3 TEST REVIEW

Basketball free-throw rebound motions

Anemometry. Anemometry. Wind Conventions and Characteristics. Anemometry. Wind Variability. Anemometry. Function of an anemometer:

Fall 2008 RED Barcode Here Physics 105, sections 1 and 2 Please write your CID Colton

Transcription:

The Seventh Asia-Pacific Conference on Wind Engineering, November 8-12, 29, Taipei, Taiwan WIND FORCES ACTING ON INFLATABLE AMUSEMENT PRODUCTS AND CRITICAL WIND SPEEDS CAUSING ACCIDENTS Akihito Yoshida 1 and Yukio Tamura 2 1 Associate Professor, Wind Engineering Research Center, Tokyo Polytechnics University 1583, Atsugi, Kanagawa, Japan, 243-297, yoshida@arch.t-kougei.ac.jp 2 Professor, Wind Engineering Research Center, Tokyo Polytechnics University 1583, Atsugi, Kanagawa, Japan, 243-297, yukio@arch.t-kougei.ac.jp ABSTRACT Inflatable amusement products are a kind of play equipment used at amusement parks and event sites, and children play inside them. Recently, there have been many reports of accidents with these products caused by strong wind. They are very light (mass about 2-3kg when empty) and can be easily blown over by wind. In this study, wind tunnel tests were conducted to investigate the characteristics of wind forces acting on scale models of inflatable amusement products of various shapes. Mean wind force coefficients obtained from wind tunnel tests were used to estimate wind speeds causing accidents and to determine safe operating wind speeds. KEYWORDS: INFLATABLE AMUSEMENT PRODUCTS, WIND FORCES, WIND SPEED ESTIMATION Introduction Inflatable amusement products are a kind of play equipment used at amusement parks and event sites, and children play inside them. Recently, there have been many reports of accidents with these products caused by strong wind. They are very light (mass about 2-3kg when empty) and can be easily blown over by wind. In addition, at event sites they are mainly used as temporary play equipment, and the anchorage systems are often insufficient to resist the wind load. ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) has published Standard Practice for Design, Manufacture, Operation, and Maintenance of Inflatable Amusement Devices 1) and the maximum safe wind speed for operation was decided as follows: Inflatable amusement devices should not be used when the wind is in excess of the maximum wind speed specified by the manufacturer. In the event that the manufacturer of the inflatable amusement device has not specified a maximum allowable wind speed for operation, the maximum wind speed for operations of inflatable amusement devices shall be 25 mph (11.1m/s). This standard specifies not only the maximum wind speed for operation of inflatable amusement products, but also the number and strength of anchorage points to resist wind loading acting on them. However, there is no operation regulation for these kinds of products in Japan, so event organizers have used their own judgment. In this study, wind tunnel tests were conducted to investigate the characteristics of wind forces acting on scale models of inflatable amusement products of various shapes. Mean wind force coefficients obtained from wind tunnel tests were used to estimate wind speeds causing accidents and to determine safe operating speeds.

The Seventh Asia-Pacific Conference on Wind Engineering, November 8-12, 29, Taipei, Taiwan Wind Tunnel Experiment Wind force experiments were conducted to measure the mean wind force and to investigate the characteristics of wind forces acting on inflatable amusement products of various shapes. Picture 1 shows an example of an inflatable amusement product. There are many types, such as slide type, mat type, dome type with/without opening, etc. In this study, the three models shown in Figure 1 were used for the wind tunnel test. The model scale was 1/4 and a wind speed profile with a power law index of.2 was adopted for the approaching flow. (a) Slide type (b) House type (with opening) Picture 1 Examples of inflatable amusement products H = 16 C Fz 5 B=15 C Mz Wind Side view (a) Slider type 35 Plan view 35 Wind H = 75 B=15 Side view (b) Mat type 15mm Plan view Wind H=15 B=15 15 Side view (c) House type (with opening) Plan view

The Seventh Asia-Pacific Conference on Wind Engineering, November 8-12, 29, Taipei, Taiwan Figure 1 Wind force models of inflatable amusement Wind Force Coefficient The wind force coefficients were defined as: Fi M i M z CFi, CMi, CMz (1) qh A qh AH qh AB where F i : wind force for i component, M i : overturning moment about i axis, M z : torsional moment, q H : velocity pressure at top of model, A: projected area at wind azimuth equal to degrees The definition of wind forces and moments are shown in Figure 1. A dynamic wind force balance that can be measure 6 components was used in these experiments. Estimation of Critical Wind Speed Causing Accidents The critical wind speeds causing accidents were estimated using the following equations: uplift 1.6W (2) AC Fz slip A 1.6 W C 2 Fx 1 C 2 Fy (3) rollover A C 1.6M Mi A H C Fz L (4) where uplift : critical wind speed for uplift, slip : critical wind speed for slip, rollover : critical wind speed for rollover, W: weight of inflatable amusement product, : static friction coefficient, W 1 : weight of inflatable amusement product considering vertical wind force, L: distance between edge of leeward side and centroid, and M A : moment calculated from distance L and weight W. The first equation estimates the critical wind speed causing the product to be blown over under uplift force. In this equation, the balance between uplift force (F z ) and product weight was considered. The critical wind speed for slip of the inflatable amusement product was estimated from the second equation. In this equation, the balance between wind force translational component and weight of inflatable amusement product that cancels the vertical wind force was considered. The critical wind speed for rollover of the inflatable amusement product was estimated from the third equation. For the estimation of critical wind speed for slip of inflatable products, the critical wind speed in case of reducing the weight of additional sandbags to half of normal situation was also estimated as slip,half. This is because, depending on the wind direction, the half of the additional weight does not work to resist wind load. Characteristics of Wind Force acting on Inflatable Amusement Products Figures 2, 3 and 4 show the characteristics of wind forces acting on various shaped models of inflatable amusement products with wind azimuth. For the slider type model shown in Figure 2(a), the lift force coefficients C Fz show negative values (i.e. downward forces were measured) when the wind azimuth was in the range of to 3 degrees. This was because of

The Seventh Asia-Pacific Conference on Wind Engineering, November 8-12, 29, Taipei, Taiwan the slope of the slider. For the other model, the lift force coefficient showed positive values for all wind directions. 2 1.5 1.5 C Fz -.5-1 -1.5 3 6 9 12 15 18.5 -.5-1 C Mz -1.5 3 6 9 12 15 18 (a) Wind force coefficient (b) Moment coefficient Figure 2 Characteristics of wind forces acting on slide-type model with wind azimuth 1.2 C 1 Fx.8 C Fz.6.4.2 -.2 1 2 3 4.6.4.2 -.2 -.4 C Mz -.6 1 2 3 4 (a) Wind force coefficient (b) Moment coefficient Figure 3 Characteristics of wind forces acting on mat-type model with wind azimuth.8.6 C Fz.4.2 -.2 -.4 -.6 3 6 9 12 15 18.15.1.5 -.5 -.1 -.15 3 6 9 12 15 18 (a) Wind force coefficient (b) Moment coefficient Figure 4 Characteristics of wind forces acting on house-type model with wind azimuth C Mz Characteristics of Wind Force acting on Inflatable Amusement Products The critical wind speeds were estimated from Equations 2 to 4 and are shown in Figure 5. Table 1 shows the information of weights of inflatable products to be used in estimation. Critical wind speeds were calculated for each wind azimuth to investigate the effect of wind azimuth. In all cases, the critical wind speeds for uplift were higher than those for the others cases. In the range from to 3 degrees for the results of slider type (Figure 5(a)), the critical wind speed for uplift was higher than 4m/s. This is because the wind force coefficients for the vertical direction were negative for these wind directions.

The Seventh Asia-Pacific Conference on Wind Engineering, November 8-12, 29, Taipei, Taiwan From these results, it can be said that the critical wind speed for inflatable amusement products is around 1m/s. Critical wind speed [m/s] 4 35 3 25 uplift 2 rollover 15 slip 1 5 slip,half 3 6 9 12 15 18 (a) Slider type Critical wind speed [m/s] 3 25 2 15 1 5 slip uplift rollover slip,half 3 6 9 12 15 18 (c) House type (with opening) Figure 5 Critical wind speed causing accident based on wind tunnel test Critical wind speed [m/s] 4 35 uplift 3 25 2 rollover 15 1 slip 5 slip,half 15 3 45 (b) Mat type Table 1 Information of weight of inflatable products type Weight Additional weight Slider type 3N 4N (2N*2) Mat type 1N 16N (2N*8) House type 15N 16N (2N*8) : the numbers of sandbag Estimation of Wind Speed Caused Accident to Shark Slider in Amusement Park In February 28, there was an accident to an inflatable amusement product named a Shark Slider, shown in Picture 2. This product was 5m high, 6m wide and 12m long, and had a very light mass of about 35kg. Additional weights (12 sandbags of 25N each) were tied around it. Children climb to the top of this slider through the mouth and go down its slider toward the tail. When the accident occurred, a girl was still inside the slider and it was blown almost 25m in the SW direction, as shown in Figure 6. (a) Front view (b) Side view Picture 2 photographs of "Shark Slider" which underwent an accident in an amusement park

The Seventh Asia-Pacific Conference on Wind Engineering, November 8-12, 29, Taipei, Taiwan Apartment building (1F) N administration building (2F) blow off (25m) Shark Slider Figure 6 Location of Shark Slider in an amusement park and direction in which it was blown off Characteristics of wind force acting on Shark Slider and wind speed estimation based on wind tunnel experiment Wind tunnel setups The wind force experiments were conducted to measure the mean wind force and to investigate the characteristics of wind forces acting on the Shark Slider. Figure 7 shows a schematic view and the dimensions of the wind force model of this slider. The model scale was 1/25 and a wind speed profile with a power law index of.2 was adopted for the approaching flow. The wind direction was varied at 1 o intervals in the range from o to 18 o and 45 o and 135 o. A dynamic wind force balance that could measure 6 components was used to measure the wind force (3 components of F x, F y, F z ) and the moments (3 components of M x, M y, M z ), as shown in Figure 7. 21mm C Fz C Mz 115 (a) Section 135 135 7 4 5 43mm 6 Wind 24mm 135 11 5 (b) Plan Figure 7 Dimensions of wind force model of Shark Slider

The Seventh Asia-Pacific Conference on Wind Engineering, November 8-12, 29, Taipei, Taiwan Characteristics of wind forces acting on Shark Slider Figure 8 shows the characteristics of the mean wind forces acting on the Shark Slider. The vertical wind force C Fz in Figure 8(a) was positive for all wind direction. This means that the Shark Slider was pulled upward regardless of wind direction. From the investigative report of the accident to the Shark Slider, the wind direction when the accident occurred was estimated to be NE. In these experiments, NE corresponded to 135 degrees. The wind forces and moment coefficients show comparatively high values for this wind direction. Estimated wind direction when the accident occurred 2 1.5 1.5 C Fz -.5-1 3 6 9 12 15 18 Wind Azimth [deg.] Mean wind force coeeficient Estimated wind direction when the accident occurred.4.3.2 C Mt.1 -.1 -.2 -.3 -.4 3 6 9 12 15 18 Wind Azimth [deg.] (a) Wind force coefficient (b) Moment coefficient Figure 8 Characteristics of wind forces acting on Shark Slider Estimation of wind speed causing accident to Shark Slider The critical wind speeds for the Shark Slider were estimated from Equations 2 to 4 and are shown in Figure 9. They were calculated for each wind azimuth to investigate the effect of wind azimuth. In all cases, the critical wind speeds for uplift were higher than those for the others cases. This was the same results as for the other inflatable model as shown in previous chapters. For slip of the Shark Slider, the estimated wind speed was 5-6 m/s in the range from 3 o to 15 o. However, in the real situation, ropes were used to fix it to the ground, and the static friction coefficient might have been larger than that of this estimation. For the wind direction at which the accident occurred, i.e. 135 degrees, the critical wind speeds were estimated as 14m/s and 16m/s for rollover and uplift, respectively. Critical wind speed [m/s] 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 uplift rollover Estimated wind direction when the accident occurred slip slip,half 3 6 9 12 15 18 Wind Azimth [deg.] Figure 8 Estimated wind speed causing accident based on wind tunnel test on Shark Slider In response to the accident to the Shark Slider, Arakawa-ku in Tokyo set up an investigative committee and made an operation manual for inflatable amusement products. In

The Seventh Asia-Pacific Conference on Wind Engineering, November 8-12, 29, Taipei, Taiwan this operation manual, the upper limit wind speed in operation was decided as a 1-minute mean value of 1 m/s. However, the results of the wind tunnel experiments conducted in this study show that this wind speed is too low and that it is better to express it as an instantaneous wind speed and not a mean wind speed. Conclusion Wind tunnel experiments were conducted on inflatable amusement products, which had often suffered accidents due to strong wind, to investigate the characteristics of the wind forces. The mean wind force coefficients obtained from these experiments were used to estimate the critical wind speeds causing accidents. As a result, the critical wind speed for most cases of inflatable amusement products were found to be less than 15m/s. In addition, the critical wind speed causing accident to the Shark Slider was estimated from wind tunnel test results. It was thus found that an accident can happen if the instantaneous wind speed is higher than 15m/s, even if the critical wind speed for slip (5-6m/s) is ignored. The upper limit wind speed for inflatable products in the operation manual made by the investigative committee was a mean of 1m/s, which is much lower than that of this study. References American Society for Testing and Materials, Standard Practice for Design, Manufacture, Operation, and Maintenance of Inflatable Amusement Devices, Designation: F 2374-7a, pp.1-4 Australian Standard, Amusement rides and devices, Part 4.1: Specific requirements Land-borne inflatable devices, AS 3533.4.1, 25 Arakawa-ku, Investigative committee report for accident of amusement products at Arakawa Amusement Park (In Japanese), September, 28