ST. JOSEPH PENINSULA, GULF COUNTY, FLORIDA Beach Re-Nourishment and Environmental Enhancement Project RECOMMENDATIONS

Similar documents
CHAPTER 281 INFLUENCE OF NEARSHORE HARDBOTTOM ON REGIONAL SEDIMENT TRANSPORT

Volume and Shoreline Changes along Pinellas County Beaches during Tropical Storm Debby

Long Term Success and Future Approach of the Captiva and Sanibel Islands Beach Renourishment Program

UPPER BEACH REPLENISHMENT PROJECT RELATED

STATUS REPORT FOR THE SUBMERGED REEF BALL TM ARTIFICIAL REEF SUBMERGED BREAKWATER BEACH STABILIZATION PROJECT FOR THE GRAND CAYMAN MARRIOTT HOTEL

Building Coastal Resiliency at Plymouth Long Beach

FINAL REPORT FOR 2013 ON THE CONDITION OF THE MUNICIPAL OCEANFRONT BEACHES THE BOROUGH OF AVALON, CAPE MAY COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

SPECIAL SPRING 2018 STORM REPORT ON THE CONDITION OF THE MUNICIPAL BEACHES FOR THE BOROUGH OF STONE HARBOR, CAPE MAY COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

Inlet Management Study for Pass-A-Grille and Bunces Pass, Pinellas County, Florida

RE: Hurricane Matthew Beach Damage Assessment and Recommendations [CSE 2416]

Figure79. Location map for the 10 NJBPN profile sites in Atlantic County, NJ 155

Climate Change Impacts to KSC Launch Complex

Long Beach Island Holgate Spit Little Egg Inlet Historical Evolution Introduction Longshore Transport Map, Survey and Photo Historic Sequence

23- Year Sand Volume Changes at Site 132, 15th Street, Brigantine

A REVIEW OF THE CONDITION OF THE MUNICIPAL BEACHES AS A RESULT OF HURRICANE SANDY IN THE BOROUGH OF STONE HARBOR, CAPE MAY COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

New Jersey Beach Profile Network Atlantic County Profile Site Locations

Regular Workshop October 20, 2014 Agenda Item: Dr. Albert E. Browder, PE; Olsen Associates, Inc.

County of Santa Barbara Permit Option Analysis Goleta Beach JULY 13, 2017

Table 4. Volumetric Change Rates Pre-Project and Post-Project for the Town of Duck

Town of Duck, North Carolina

Follets Island Nearshore Beach Nourishment Project

ATLANTIC COUNTY 2006 to 2008

AN OVERVIEW OF RECENT PROJECTS RELATED TO SAND BUDGETS, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BEACHES

Figure 262. Location map for the 10 NJBPN profile sites in Atlantic County, NJ 279

Dune Monitoring Data Update Summary: 2013

Town of Duck, North Carolina

4/20/17. #32 - Coastal Erosion Case Histories - Lake Michigan

2013 ANNUAL REPORT - TO THE CITY OF NORTH WILDWOOD ON THE CONDITION OF THE CITY BEACHES

Impact of Hurricane Matthew on the Atlantic Coast of Florida

Figure 38. Locations of the 28 NJBPN profile stations in Ocean County, NJ.

Anguilla. Wise practices for coping with. i b bea n Se a

Absecon Island Shore Protection The planning behind the project

Atlantic Coast of Long Island, Jones Inlet to East Rockaway Inlet, Long Beach Island, NY Construction Update

Protecting our Beaches

2014 ANNUAL REPORT - TO THE CITY OF NORTH WILDWOOD ON THE CONDITION OF THE CITY BEACHES

ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA

Beach, dune and development in the Borough of Mantoloking as of January Prepared for The Borough of Mantoloking: April 2, 2008

New Jersey Coastal Zone Overview. The New Jersey Beach Profile Network (NJBPN) 3 Dimensional Assessments. Quantifying Shoreline Migration

Shoreline Change in Response to Sea Level Rise on Florida s Panhandle Coast. Jim Houston `

The 2017 Panama City Beaches Beach Interim Renourishment Project. Answers to Common Questions

Figure 38. Locations of the 28 NJBPN profile stations in Ocean County, NJ.

SACO RIVER AND CAMP ELLIS BEACH SACO, MAINE SECTION 111 SHORE DAMAGE MITIGATION PROJECT APPENDIX F ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT

FINAL REPORT FOR 2013 ON THE CONDITION OF THE MUNICIPAL BEACHES IN THE TOWNSHIP OF UPPER, CAPE MAY COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

Assateague Island National Seashore North End Restoration Project Timeline

PREPARED FOR: THE BOROUGH OF AVALON 3100 DUNE DRIVE AVALON, NJ 08202

FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT

Beach Renourishment in Jacksonville

2018 Annual Beach Monitoring Report

Figure 46. Locations of the 28 NJBPN profile stations in Ocean County, NJ. A new site was added in the Borough of Seaside Heights (#248).

To: William Woods, Jenni Austin Job No: CentrePort Harbour Deepening Project - Comments on community queries

St Kitts. Wise practices for coping with

ALTERNATIVES FOR COASTAL STORM DAMAGE MITIGATION

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ON BROWARD COUNTY SHORE PROTECTION PROJECT SEGMENTS II AND III BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

Performance of Upham Beach T-Groin Project and Its Impact to the Downdrift Beach

FINAL REPORT FOR 2011 ON THE CONDITION OF THE MUNICIPAL BEACHES IN THE CITY OF BRIGANTINE BEACH, ATLANTIC COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

DUXBURY WAVE MODELING STUDY

2015 ANNUAL REPORT - TO THE CITY OF NORTH WILDWOOD ON THE CONDITION OF THE CITY BEACHES

EVALUATION OF BEACH EROSION UP-DRIFT OF TIDAL INLETS IN SOUTHWEST AND CENTRAL FLORIDA, USA. Mohamed A. Dabees 1 and Brett D.

Beach Nourishment Impact on Beach Safety and Surfing in the North Reach of Brevard County, Florida

Nevis. Wise practices for coping with

Tanya M. Beck. Kelly Legault. Research Physical Scientist Coastal & Hydraulics Lab, ERDC Vicksburg, MS

Delaware Chapter Surfrider Foundation - Indian River Inlet Monitoring

FINAL REPORT FOR 2009 ON THE CONDITION OF THE MUNICIPAL OCEANFRONT BEACHES IN THE BOROUGH OF AVALON, CAPE MAY COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

USE OF SEGMENTED OFFSHORE BREAKWATERS FOR BEACH EROSION CONTROL

Broad Beach Sand & Dune Habitat Restoration Project. Revetment Owners Meeting July 12, 2017

ATLANTIC COAST OF LONG ISLAND, JONES INLET TO EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, LONG BEACH ISLAND, NY. Contract #2 Construction Scope. April 18th-19th 2018

Beach Restoration in Okaloosa and Walton Counties. FSBPA Technology Conference Clearwater, FL

HURRICANE SANDY LIMITED REEVALUATION REPORT UNION BEACH, NEW JERSEY DRAFT ENGINEERING APPENDIX SUB APPENDIX D SBEACH MODELING

Beach profile surveys and morphological change, Otago Harbour entrance to Karitane May 2014 to June 2015

OCEAN COUNTY 2006 to 2008

PLAQUEMINES PARISH BARRIER ISLAND RESTORATION & SUSTAINABILITY. MVD/Gulf Coast Regional Dredging Meeting November 5, 2013

1-32 NOME HARBOR, ALASKA (CWIS NOS , 87755, 12270, & 10422) Condition of Improvement 30 September 2012

Shoalwater Bay Shorline Erosion Dredging

Wind Blow-out Hollow Generated in Fukiage Dune Field, Kagoshima Prefecture, Japan

Final Waterways Assets and Resources Survey Master Plan for Dredging and Beach Nourishment

The Stockton University Coastal

CHAPTER 179. Performance of a Submerged Breakwater for Shore Protection

Figure 106. Locations of the 28 NJBPN profile stations in Ocean County, NJ.

Feasibility Study for Restoration of Titlow Lagoon Fish Passage. South Puget Sound Salmon Enhancement Group

Lecture Outlines PowerPoint. Chapter 15 Earth Science, 12e Tarbuck/Lutgens

RI Regulatory Setbacks & Buffers: Coastal Management Issues

An Update of Coastal Erosion in Puerto Rico

FINAL REPORT FOR 2012 ON THE CHANGES SEEN ON THE OCEANFRONT BEACHES

Q1. What are the primary causes/contributors to coastal erosion at Westshore and the concept of longshore / littoral drift.

Dare County Nourishment Project Town of Duck

Julebæk Strand. Effect full beach nourishment

Southern California Beach Processes Study

Chapter 15 SEASONAL CHANGES IN BEACHES OP THE NORTH ATLANTIC COAST OF THE UNITED STATES

ALTERNATIVES FOR COASTAL STORM DAMAGE MITIGATION AND FUNCTIONAL DESIGN OF COASTAL STRUCTURES

Nome Harbor Page 2 of 12

Navarre Beach & Dune Restoration Project Status Report to be regularly updated June 17, 2016 Report

Recycling of Surplus Sand to Extend the Time Between Beach Fill Episodes

CLAM PASS RESTORATION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN BATHYMETRIC MONITORING REPORT NO. 7 Including Interior Bay Dredge Cuts and Tidal Data

North Shore of Long Island, Feasibility Study

Overview. Beach Features. Coastal Regions. Other Beach Profile Features. CHAPTER 10 The Coast: Beaches and Shoreline Processes.

Nearshore Dredged Material Placement Pilot Study at Noyo Harbor, CA

New Jersey Beach Profile Network Ocean County Profile Site Locations

Trusted Partners Delivering Value, Today and Tomorrow BUILDING STRONG

Modeling Sediment Transport Along the Upper Texas Coast

Effectiveness of Beach Nourishment in Response to Sea Level Rise

Transcription:

ST. JOSEPH PENINSULA, GULF COUNTY, FLORIDA Beach Re-Nourishment and Environmental Enhancement Project RECOMMENDATIONS January 23, 2018 543 Harbor Boulevard, Suite 204 Destin, Florida 32541 850.654.1555 www.mrd-associates.com Disclaimer: The information presented within this document shall be considered valid at the time of the presentation on January 23, 2018 and is provided for informational purposes only and subject to change. The reproduction of the following presentation is prohibited without the expressed written permission of MRD Associates, Inc.

OUTLINE Shoreline and Volume Changes Volume Changes and Proposed Beach Fill Existing Conditions Findings Dredging Market Conditions Recommendations

SHORELINE AND VOLUME CHANGES The following two slides illustrate the measured shoreline and volume changes over the 5-year period since the completion of the project in 2009 to 2014. The changes are measured through monitoring surveys. The data shows that the Southern Limits of the project from Stumphole to the south end of Rish Park is eroding. The highest loss of sand is the southern-most 1 mile shoreline segment (R-100 to R-105.5) just north of Stumphole which lost approximately -866,800 cubic yards of sand over the 5- year period. The 2.1 mile segment (R-90 to R-100) to the north (Rish Park at the northern boundary) lost approximately -689,700 cubic yards. The 2-mile Northern Limits (Rish Park north to the St. Joseph Peninsula State Park) gained approximately +163,955 cubic yards (R-75 to R-85). The primary source of the accreting sand is coming from the southern end of the beach fill project. The volume changes were over a 5-year period between 2009 and 2014. Since 2014 these trends have continued so that the changes would have increased by about 35% (+221,340 cubic yards) in 2018. These volumes are used, in part, to estimate volumes of sand that will need to be placed during the beach re-nourishment project.

SHORELINE AND VOLUME CHANGES North Limits (V-74.8 to R-85) are gaining sand. Net Sediment Transport South Limits (R-90 to R-105.5) are eroding.

VOLUME CHANGES AND PROPOSED BEACH FILL Historic volume changes State Park to No. Rish Park R-75 to R-85 1997 to 2008-4.8 cy/lf/yr 2009 to 2014 +5.5 cy/lf/yr So. Rish Park to Scallop Cove R-90 and R-100 1997 to 2008-13.9 cy/lf/yr 2009 to 2014-7.4 cy/lf/yr 2009-14 Changes Beach Fill North Limits gained sand between 2009 and 2014. This is consistent with pre-beach project St. Joseph trends. R -75 Northern End +163,955 cubic yards (+212,320 cubic yards) Peninsula State Park R -80 R -85 Rish Park Southern End -689,700 cubic yards R -90 R -95 (+292,605 cubic yards) Scallop Cove to Stumphole R-100 and R-105 1997 to 2008-23.9 cy/lf/yr 2009 to 2014-25.6 cy/lf/yr South Limits lost sand between 2009 and 2014. This is consistent with pre-beach project trends. -866,800 cubic yards (+652,680 cubic yards) Total for Southern End -1,556,500 cubic yards (+945,285 cubic yards) (Proposed beach fill volume in 2017 Bid.) R -100 R -105 Stump Hole USAFB R -110 Cape San Blas

EXISTING CONDITIONS SOUTH LIMITS The following photos further illustrate the erosion that has occurred between 2008 and 2018 for the Southern Limits of the beach project. St. Joseph Peninsula State Park R -75 R -80 R -85 Rish Park R -90 R -95 Photos along this shoreline segment. R -100 R -105 Stump Hole USAFB R -110 Cape San Blas

CONSTRUCTION (10/08) Looking north. Scallop Cove in middle right of the aerial photograph.

NORTH OF STUMPHOLE (10/19/10) 1.5-Year Post-Construction Note building for reference.

NORTH OF STUMPHOLE (12/5/17) 8-Year Post-Construction Note building for reference. Shoreline between the Stumphole Revetment and the southern-most house eroded over 250 feet in 8-Years.

NORTH TOWARD SUNRISE/SUNSET (10/19/10) 1.5-Year Post-Construction Note building for reference.

NORTH TOWARD SUNRISE/SUNSET (1/4/18) 8-Year Post-Construction Note building for reference. Beach and dune erosion and undermining of the structure. Beach is low and narrow.

SEAGRASS (1/4/18) 8-Year Post-Construction Beach is narrow. Dune erosion but higher in elevation than Stumphole Beach segment.

2-Year Post-Construction CAPE SHOALS (3/23/11)

CAPE SHOALS (1/4/18) 8-Year Post-Construction Shoreline eroded over 150 feet in 8-Years. The dune is being eroded due to the structure being located 75-feet further seaward than the adjacent buildings. The dune and structure is located within the active beach zone. Structures should be relocated landward as far back as practical as allowed by local planning and building codes.

EXISTING CONDITIONS NORTH LIMITS The following photos further illustrate the gain of sand that has occurred Between 2010 and 2018 for the Northern Limits of the beach project. St. Joseph Peninsula State Park R -75 R -80 Photos along this shoreline segment. R -85 Rish Park R -90 R -95 R -100 R -105 Stump Hole USAFB R -110 Cape San Blas

NORTH OF RISH PARK (10/19/10) 1.5-Year Post-Construction Dunes Drive

NORTH OF RISH PARK (1/4/18) 8-Year Post-Construction Dunes Drive Beach is slightly wider than it was in 2010 and is higher in elevations than along the Southern Limits between Stumphole and Rish Park. This beach segment is accreting (gaining) sand.

BARRIER DUNES (10/19/10) 1.5-Year Post-Construction Barrier Dunes

BARRIER DUNES (1/4/18) 8-Year Post-Construction Barrier Dunes Beach is slightly wider than it was in 2010 and is higher in elevations than along the Southern Limits between Stumphole and Rish Park. This beach segment is accreting (gaining) sand. Minor dune erosion north of Barrier Dunes along the Secluded Dunes Subdivision.

FINDINGS North of Rish Park Accreting with sand transported from the south fill limits Structures are 200+ feet from the water s edge Beach wide and high providing a high level of storm protection Beach re-nourishment (2018) is not needed north of Rish Park South of Rish Park Significant beach and dune erosion along entire southern limits Structures as close as 75-feet from the water s edge Beach narrow and low in elevation provides reduced storm protection Sand placed along the south limits will benefit the north fill limits Need to protect hurricane evacuation route

DREDGING MARKET CONDITIONS Are the current market conditions favorable to receive low bids to construction the beach fill project? Federal projects have a major influence on the availability of dredges and bid prices. Too many unknowns on the Federal level to predict how these factors may affect the SJP beach fill project. Political climate in Washington, D.C. Budget Appropriations for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has not been passed. Supplemental Emergency Recovery Bill $12B - House (passed), Senate (pending) Dredgers need flexibility in the design and timing of construction will help reduce costs.

RECOMMENDATIONS Remove the North Beach Fill from the 2018 project Repair dune erosion and Hot-Spots by Truck-haul, as needed Construct the South Beach Fill in 2018 Feeder Beach by dredging offshore sand Re-bid the project for available budget ~$10.5M Cape Shoals relocation Advertise for bids March-April Award by May Construction between June and November Reduce construction from 120+/- days to 75+/- days by reducing the project volume and length.

RECOMMENDATIONS These recommendations are based on the volume changes measured over the entire project shoreline extending from Stumphole north to the SJP State Park. The greatest sand loss is in the southern 1-mile of shoreline (R-100 to R-105.5) 866,800 cubic yards and 689,700 cubic yards for the 2.1-mile segment (R-90 to R-100). The 2-mile Northern Limits (Rish Park to SJP State Park) has gained approximately 163,955 cubic yards (R-75 to R-85). The primary source of the accreting sand is coming from the southern end of the beach fill project. Since 2014 these erosional and accretional trends have continued thus the measured changes would increase by 35% in 2018. For example, the projected gain of sand for the North Limits is 163,955 cubic yards x 135% = +221,340 cubic yards (2009 to 2018). The goal of this project is to place sand in areas of greatest need with the limited amount of available funds which is the southern end where over 1.5M cubic yards of sand has eroded from the beaches. The northern end has gained sand (estimated at 221,340 cubic yards as of 2018). Erosional hot spots along the northern end can be addressed through a truck-haul project, as needed. To obtain the lowest bids, it is necessary to provide the dredgers flexibility in the design and the timing to construct the project. This will allow them to fit in this project between other projects to maximize the availability of equipment and labor.

RECOMMENDATIONS 2017 Low Bid - $17.8M North Beach Fill - $3.2M +212,320 cubic yards South Beach Fill - $14.6M +945,285 cubic yards November 2017 Available Funding $10.5M State ($3.73M) and Local ($6.77M) Reduction in cost to fit within available budget $14.6M - $10.5M = $4.1M

RECOMMENDATIONS Fill limits and beach width will be required for bidders to estimate costs. More than one plan will be needed to estimate costs for varying volumes.

THANK YOU! Thank you. Questions?