Big Canyon 67 miles upstream. 38 miles upstream

Similar documents
SOONER LAKE MANAGEMENT PLAN

SKIATOOK LAKE MANAGEMENT PLAN

CARL BLACKWELL LAKE MANAGEMENT PLAN

DRIPPING SPRINGS LAKE 5 YEAR LAKE MANAGEMENT PLAN

Introduction: JadEco, LLC PO BOX 445 Shannon, IL 61078

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

JadEco, LLC PO BOX 445 Shannon, IL 61078

Regulations. Grabbling season May 1 July 15; only wooden structures allowed.

ASMFC Stock Assessment Overview: Red Drum

Current projects for Fisheries Research Unit of Minnesota Department of Natural Resources

ASMFC Stock Assessment Overview: Red Drum

MIDDLE FORK RESERVOIR Wayne County 2004 Fish Management Report. Christopher C. Long Assistant Fisheries Biologist

Tunica Cutoff 2018 REEL FACTS Keith Meals Fisheries Biologist

Results of the 2015 nontidal Potomac River watershed Smallmouth Bass Young of Year Survey

Bode Lake - South Population Survey

Regulations. Grabbling season May 1 July 15; only wooden structures allowed.

MARTINDALE POND Wayne County 2004 Fish Management Report. Christopher C. Long Assistant Fisheries Biologist

Regulations. Grabbling season May 1 July 15; only wooden structures allowed.

Regulations. Grabbling season May 1 July 15; only wooden structures allowed.

Busse Reservoir South Lateral Pool Population Survey

Lake Winnibigoshish Fisheries Information Newsletter

Chesapeake Bay Jurisdictions White Paper on Draft Addendum IV for the Striped Bass Fishery Management Plan

Dauphin Lake Fishery. Status of Walleye Stocks and Conservation Measures

Green Lake Population Survey

Fish Lake Informational Meeting. Dan Wilfond, Fisheries Specialist Deserae Hendrickson, Area Fisheries Supervisor MN DNR Fisheries - Duluth

NURSERY POND Fish Management Report. Jason C. Doll Assistant Fisheries Biologist

Pond Management. Dan Lekie Agriculture & Natural Resource Agent K-State Research & Extension Johnson County

RECREATIONAL PONDS AND LAKES

Trout Production at the Bobby N. Setzer Fish Hatchery

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

2017 Lake Winnebago Bottom Trawling Assessment Report

LAKE DIANE Hillsdale County (T8-9S, R3W, Sections 34, 3, 4) Surveyed May Jeffrey J. Braunscheidel

Arrowhead Lake Population Survey

Fish Conservation and Management

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE SPORT FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

LOGAN MARTIN RESERVOIR MANAGEMENT REPORT. Prepared by. E. Daniel Catchings District Fisheries Supervisor

Nechako white sturgeon are an Endangered Species

Crawford Reservoir. FISH SURVEY AND MANAGEMENT INFORMATION Eric Gardunio, Fish Biologist Montrose Service Center

Claytor Lake View of the Claytor Lake dam from Claytor Lake State Park s boat ramp.

Tampier Lake Population Survey

Managing a Quality Pond

Schiller Pond Population Survey

Wampum Lake Population Survey

Hatcheries: Role in Restoration and Enhancement of Salmon Populations

Big Bend Lake Population Survey

Tuttle Creek Fisheries Newsletter Spring 2017

Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency Fisheries Management Division Ellington Agricultural Center P. O. Box Nashville, TN 37204

Sag Quarry - West Population Survey

Rolling Knolls Pond Population Survey

2014 Winnebago System Walleye Report

Current Status and Management Recommendations for the Fishery in the Cloverleaf Chain of Lakes

Spring Lake 2017 REEL FACTS Keith Meals Fisheries Biologist

INLAND LAKE MANAGEMENT REPORT FY Spring 2008

RAFTS STOCKING POLICY

Aquatic Plant Management and Importance to Sport Fisheries

Prewitt Reservoir LAST UPDATED: JANUARY 2016 FISH SURVEY AND MANAGEMENT DATA Mandi Brandt - Aquatic Biologist (Brush)

FISH COMMUNITIES AND FISHERIES OF THE THOUSAND ISLANDS AND MIDDLE CORRIDOR

Ross Barnett Reservoir 2019

2014 Island Lake Survey June 13 th, 2014 Andrew Plauck District Fisheries Biologist Report Prepared 4 March 2015

Maple Lake Population Survey

Penny Road Pond Population Survey

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY SOUTH ATLANTIC DIVISION, CORPS OF ENGINEERS ROOM 9M15, 60 FORSYTH ST., S.W. ATLANTA GA

Behavior and survival of hatchery reared advanced fingerling largemouth bass using radio telemetry. Brandon Thompson

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

During the mid-to-late 1980s

Sebec Lake Fisheries Management Plan 2012

Overview of Recreational Pond Management

Finding the Way Home

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

Caro Impoundment, Tuscola County

2015 Winnebago System Walleye Report

Protection Measures Against Exotic Species

7/29/2011. Sport fish. Rough fish. Fish Population Assessment

Status Review and Management Outline for Quality Bluegill and Black Crappie Populations in the Grand Rapids Area.

MIDDLE FORK RESERVOIR Wayne County 2006 Fish Management Report. Christopher C. Long Assistant Fisheries Biologist

Cedar Lake Comprehensive Survey Report Steve Hogler and Steve Surendonk WDNR-Mishicot

Fighting for Life in French Creek

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

Regulations. Grabbling season May 1 July 15; only wooden structures allowed.

Previous Stocking Black crappie. Channel catfish. Cutbow. Rainbow trout. Saugeye Black crappie. Channel catfish. Cutbow.

Justification for Rainbow Trout stocking reduction in Lake Taneycomo. Shane Bush Fisheries Management Biologist Missouri Department of Conservation

Striped Bass and White Hybrid (x) Striped Bass Management and Fishing in Pennsylvania

Pickwick Lake 2018 REEL FACTS Trevor Knight Fisheries Biologist (662)

Ross Barnett Reservoir 2018

BLACK OAK LAKE S LAKE TROUT

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

Search for the missing sea otters

FISH POPULATION ASSESSMENT AND INTERPRETATION FOR PRIVATE WATERS

Species Profile: Red Drum Benchmark Assessment Finds Resource Relatively Stable with Overfishing Not Occurring

North Carolina. Striped Mullet FMP. Update

Anadromous Forage Fisheries in Blue Hill Bay: Rainbow Smelt (Recreational) Alewife and Blueback Herring (Commercial and Recreational)

I. Project Title: Upper Yampa River northern pike management and monitoring

Agenda Item Summary BACKGROUND. Public Involvement ISSUE ANALYSIS. Attachment 1

COLORADO RIVER RECOVERY PROGRAM RECOVERY PROGRAM FY 2015 ANNUAL PROJECT REPORT PROJECT NUMBER: 160

Arizona Game and Fish Department Region VI Fisheries Program

DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE Fisheries Division 6980 Sierra Center Parkway, Ste 120 Reno, Nevada (775) Fax (775)

Columbia Lake Dam Removal Project

2017 State of the Tidal Potomac River Largemouth Bass Fishery (Maryland) Joe Love

The Round Goby Botulism Connection. Renea A. Ruffing Graduate Research Assistant Penn State University

Transcription:

TEXOMA STRIPED BASS MANAGEMENT/RESEARCH Texoma is one of only about 1 reservoirs in the country that has a naturally reproducing striped bass population. Texoma is set off further from most reservoirs in that striped bass make spawning runs up two separate rivers, the Washita River and the Red River. The Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation (ODWC) has viewed preserving the uniqueness and the economic value of this fishery has a high priority. The Texoma fishery has faced threats from proposed water diversion projects in recent years and in 2, ODWC increased its research efforts to learn more about the ecology of striped bass in Texoma better understand the impacts of these water diversion projects. We knew that striped bass spawned in both rivers, but the only site that was verified was the Big Canyon area near Dougherty on the Washita River. ODWC along with graduate students from the University of Oklahoma identified one additional spawning site on the Washita River and three sites on the Red River. Big Canyon 67 miles upstream 47 miles upstream Spawning Areas Mannsville 88 miles upstream Leon Burneyville 38 miles upstream 63 miles upstream Temperature and stream flow are keys to adult striped bass moving upstream to spawn. Our studies indicated that spawning typically begins around the first to second week of April and continues through mid May. Egg production peaks 2-3 days following a rise in flow.

RED RIVER-22 6 5 5 Hydrograph 4 Discharge m 3 s -1 4 3 2 Eggs 3 2 Eggs/m 3 1 1 4/4 4/14 4/24 5/4 5/14 Date We typically see 2 to 3 pulses of eggs produced in each river, generally related to rises in the river due to rainfall. Washita River Red River Avg. Egg Catches Among Sites 6 5 4 3 2 1 3/3 4/9 4/19 4/29 5/9 5/19 5/29 21 22 23 Avg. Egg Catches Am ong Sites 6 5 4 3 2 1 3/2 3/3 4/9 4/19 4/29 5/9 5/19 5/29 21 22 23 We collected more eggs in the Washita River than in the Red River. However, this was more related to differences in the nature of the rivers than in the number of eggs in each river. The Washita River is a more channelized river than the Red River with the flow being confined within the banks. This made the nets that we used to collect striped bass eggs much more effective on the Washita River than the Red River. Because of the flow being confined within the banks of the Washita River, it also takes less flow in the Washita for striped bass to move up the river and spawn than it does in the Red River.

ODWC has been monitoring juvenile striped bass abundance using seines annually (June) since striped bass were stocked in the late 196 s through the 197 s. Beginning in 2 ODWC seining efforts increased to get a better idea of the differences in numbers of juvenile striped bass being produced in the Washita River arm and the Red River arm. 2 and 23 were years of relatively low spring flows. More juvenile striped bass were collected in the Washita River arm in those years. In years of normal to high spring flows, more juvenile striped bass were collected in the Red River arm. 25 was an extremely dry spring resulting in poor spawns in both river systems. Fortunately, 24 was an exceptional year for production of striped bass and should lessen the effect of the poor spawn in 25 on angler catches. 25 2 Red River Washita River Number/haul 15 1 5 2 21 22 23 24 25 Graduate students from Oklahoma State University, in conjunction with ODWC staff, conducted research on larval and juvenile striped bass diets and investigated over-winter survival of juvenile striped bass. Striped bass feed on plankton as larvae and small juveniles, switching to insects in mid summer. The size distribution of juvenile striped bass spreads out quickly. 25 The larger juveniles switch to June, 24 a fish diet, primarily 2 silversides, by midsummer. By 15 fall, the smaller individuals continue to feed on plankton 1 and insects, but the larger individuals continue to prey on 5 fish, with shad supplementing silversides in the diet. These juvenile striped bass continued 1 2 3 4 to feed throughout the winter LENGTH (INCHES) and there was no indication of NUMBER

mortality of these smaller striped bass as has been reported from other lakes around the country. One of the primary questions we are hoping to answer with our research is will adult striped bass that were spawned in either the Washita or Red Rivers return to that river to spawn or will they simply make their spawning run up whichever river they happen to be near? Researchers from the University of Oklahoma Biological Station genetically analyzed juvenile striped bass from around the lake and, while genetic differences were found, these differences could not be related to one river system or the other. Researchers from Oklahoma State University have been looking at the chemistry of bony structures from juvenile striped bass and have shown some promising results in identifying differences in fish spawned in each river. This work is ongoing with the ultimate goal of being able to chemically identify the river of origin of adult striped bass collected on their spawning runs. This information has some ramifications related to the proposed water diversion projects. It has already been shown that low flows have a more negative effect on striped bass recruitment in the Red River than on the Washita River. If adult fish will return only to the river that they were spawned in, over the course of time, fewer adult striped bass will be available to run up the Red River to spawn. Three rate functions determine the abundance and size structure of any fish population; recruitment (number of small fish produced each year), growth, and mortality (percent of the population that dies each year). Most striped bass populations across the country are maintained through stockings. As mentioned previously, Texoma is one of only about 1 lakes that have naturally reproducing populations of striped bass and Texoma is fairly unique in that recruitment occurs in two river systems. Because of recruitment from both the Red and Washita Rivers, Texoma s striped bass population is one of the most abundant in the country. ODWC has aged striped bass from 3 of our last 4 winter gill-net samples. Growth rates of striped bass at Texoma are not as high as many of the other striped bass lakes which are supported by stocking. This is due largely to the high abundance of striped bass in Texoma. However, this high abundance allows ODWC and Texas Parks and Wildlife to provide some of the most liberal harvest regulations (1 fish daily creel/2 fish over 2 inches) of any striped bass fishery. LENGTH (inches) AGE 23 24 26 AVERAGE 1 7.3 7.7 8.1 7.7 2 13.7 14.1 13.2 13.7 3 17.9 18. 2. 18.6 4 2.8 21.2 21.8 21.3 5 23.2 23.2 23.1 23.2 6 25.8 27. 25.9 26.2 7 29. 28. 29.5 Mortality rate is the last factor which determines the number and size of striped bass in Texoma. Estimates from ODWC s annual samples indicate that approximately 5% of the striped bass age 1 and older die every year. A 5% mortality rate is not unusual for sport fish populations. The average largemouth bass population has about a 4% mortality rate. The average mortality rate for blue catfish populations in Oklahoma is about 25%. Some crappie

populations have a mortality rate as high as 8%. Mortality can be broken down into two categories, natural and angler harvest. Natural mortality includes predation, starvation, disease, old age, and releases through the dam. Starvation is a significant mortality factor in years following threadfin shad winterkills. The summer following a threadfin shad winter kill, fish will be in poor condition and will not have the energy reserves to survive the winter. This will be reflected in the gill net catches the year following the shad kill. The last threadfin shad winterkill on Texoma was in 2-21. The graph below reflects a decrease in numbers in the 22 gill-net sample. The bulk of the decline was in fish over 2 inches. Since then, the numbers have been steadily increasing. The 24 year class was exceptionally strong and is now averaging 13 in length. Barring another threadfin kill and/or summer flooding, these numbers should continue to increase. Number/net 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 Total >2 in 1993 1995 1997 1999 21 23 25 Angler harvest and catch and release mortality are also significant contributors to the 5% total mortality rate. Anyone who has fished Texoma has witnessed the number of boats fishing for striped bass. Approximately 2 full-time guides operate on the lake which far surpasses what most fisheries would support. However, because of high recruitment this level of harvest is needed to reduce the numbers of smaller (less than 2 inches) fish and keep the striped bass in balance with the shad population and maintain growth rates. Catch and release mortality of fish over 2 inches, particularly in the warm summer months, reduces the numbers of large striped bass available to the anglers. Studies have shown that as high as 5% of striped bass caught and released in summer will die. ODWC encourages anglers to move off schools of large fish once the 2 fish/person limit is reached. Large striped bass that are released, particularly in summer, should be fizzed by inserting a needle into the air bladder prior to release.

25 was a banner year for striped bass fishing on Texoma with good numbers and sizes available to anglers. Numbers of striped bass over 2 inches will be down slightly this year but overall, fishing for striped bass should be excellent again in 26.