Sublette Moose Project! 2014 Capture Report

Similar documents
Wyoming Range Mule Deer Project. Summer 2017 Update

2009 Update. Introduction

Deer-Elk Ecology Research Project

Identifying mule deer migration routes to and from the Pinedale Anticline Project Area

Evaluating the Influence of Development on Mule Deer Migrations

Improving Big Game Migration Corridors in Southwest Wyoming

JACKSON MOOSE HERD UNIT POPULATION OBJECTIVE REVIEW. Prepared by: Alyson Courtemanch, North Jackson Wildlife Biologist

Sublette County WPLI Advisory Committee Meeting Summary April 5, 2017 Pinedale, WY

Brendan A. Oates Curriculum Vitae April 2016

Influence of nutritional condition on migration, habitat selection and foraging ecology of elk (Cervus elaphus) in western Wyoming

Copyright 2018 by Jamie L. Sandberg

Mule deer in the Boundary Region: Proposed research and discussion

Final Review of New Information Appendix E AMPs-Sheep Allotments in Gravelly Mountains. c,llorttarta 'Fisft, MADISON RANGER DISTRICT.

GRIZZLY BEAR MANAGEMENT CAPTURES, RELOCATIONS, AND REMOVALS IN NORTHWEST WYOMING

Deer Management Unit 152

The Role and Economic Importance of Private Lands in Providing Habitat for Wyoming s Big Game

Identifying Mule Deer Migration Routes Along the Pinedale Front

Wyoming Game and Fish Department

Comparison of Documents Norton: FWS-WDC. 1. What is the Porcupine caribou herd's historic calving range?

Teton County Related Hunting and Fishing Spending, For the Wyoming Wildlife Federation. David T. Taylor & Thomas Foulke

WYOMING 2014 STATEWIDE HUNTING SEASON FORECAST. PRONGHORN (antelope)

Deer Management Unit 252

Northern Yellowstone Cooperative Wildlife Working Group 2012 Annual Report (October 1, 2012-September 30, 2012) Member Agencies

APPENDIX A. Population characteristics, movements, and disease surveillance in the Palisades mountain goat herd, Wyoming 2015.

Deer Management Unit 249

2017 Wyoming Outdoor Hall of Fame Nomination Form

Wyoming Public Lands Initiative (WPLI) Fortification Creek Advisory Committee Meeting March 13, 2017

Deer Management Unit 127

DMU 053 Mason County Deer Management Unit

WGFD. News Release. Dec. 23, Contact: Al Langston (307) For Immediate Release:

WRITTEN TESTIMONY FOR HOUSE COMMITTEE ON RESOURCES HEARING ON REPUBLICAN ENERGY BILL ENERGY SECURITY ACT JULY 11, 2001

Wyoming Game and Fish Department

Population Ecology Yellowstone Elk by C. John Graves

Deer Management Unit 122

2017 LATE WINTER CLASSIFICATION OF NORTHERN YELLOWSTONE ELK

NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION Protecting Parks for Future Generations

Thank you in advance for considering this important issue. We hope that we may hear from you soon with a positive answer.

Influence of nutritional condition on migration, habitat selection and foraging ecology of elk (Cervus elaphus) in western Wyoming.

DMU 043 Lake County Deer Management Unit

DMU 038 Jackson County

WADE WEST INCENTIVE TAGS 2016 NDOW- REPORTING BIOLOGIST SCOTT ROBERTS

021 Deer Management Unit

Subject: Scoping Comments Ochoco Summit OHV Trail Project

Michigan Predator-Prey Project Phase 1 Preliminary Results and Management Recommendations. Study Background

RANCHING Wildlife. Texas White-Tailed Deer 2017 Hunting Forecast

Summary of discussion

Wolves in Yellowstone Park. A Story about Ecosystem Balance

REBOUND. on the. It was the winter of 2000/2001, and it seemed like the snow

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion

IMPROVING POPULATION MANAGEMENT AND HARVEST QUOTAS OF MOOSE IN RUSSIA

Mule deer migration and the Bald Mountain Mine a summary of baseline data

Status Report on the Yellowstone Bison Population, August 2016 Chris Geremia 1, Rick Wallen, and P.J. White August 17, 2016

WILDLIFE RESEARCH PERMIT NUMBER WL

Wyoming Game and Fish Department

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

Fremont County Related Hunting and Fishing Spending, 2015

Jeffrey M. Ver Steeg Colorado Parks and Wildlife. December 14, 2016

Lookout Mountain Ranch

NCDE Spring Meeting Notes

DMU 332 Huron, Sanilac and Tuscola Counties Deer Management Unit

North Platte River-Little Snake River drainage divide area landform origi s, USA Missouri River drainage basin landform origins research project

Identifying Mule Deer Migration Routes

Deer Management Unit 349

March 28, Wyoming Game and Fish Department Attn: CWD Plan 3030 Energy Lane Casper, WY To the Wyoming Game and Fish Department:

DMU 065 Ogemaw County Deer Management Unit

Faler Creek Ranch DANIEL, WYOMING. Fly Fishing Hunting Ranching Conservation

MOOSE SURVEY RACKLA AREA LATE-WINTER Prepared by: Mark O'Donoghue, Joe Bellmore, Sophie Czetwertynski and Susan Westover

ATLANTIC SALMON NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR, SALMON FISHING AREAS 1-14B. The Fisheries. Newfoundland Region Stock Status Report D2-01

Introduction to Pennsylvania s Deer Management Program. Christopher S. Rosenberry Deer and Elk Section Bureau of Wildlife Management

A Review of Mule and Black-tailed Deer Population Dynamics

Colorado West Slope Mule Deer Strategy Public Engagement Report

MAYO MOOSE MANAGEMENT UNIT

Sierra Nevada Bighorn Sheep Proposal

Elk Restoration in the Northern Cumberland Plateau, Tennessee. Lisa Muller, Jason Kindall, Jason Lupardus University of Tennessee

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

DMU 057 Missaukee County Deer Management Unit

Teton River Confluence Ranch TETON VALLEY, IDAHO

Deer Management Unit 255

Wildlife CSI - Panhandle elk mortality study

Into the Al Hajar with the Arabian Tahr 2012 FIELD REPORT

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SUMMARY OF COUGAR RESEARCH IN OREGON

Interim Guidance Fish Presence Absence

Managing Chesapeake Bay s Land Use, Fish Habitat, and Fisheries: Studies. Jim Uphoff & Margaret McGinty, Fisheries Service

DAU E-24 DISAPPOINTMENT CREEK ELK MANAGEMENT PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FINAL 01/2006

2012 Wildlife Studies

Analyzing Human- Environment Interactions using GIS. Cape Breton Highlands Education Centre/Academy

Research Status. Management Problems

PROTECTING SAGE GROUSE AND THEIR HABITAT IN THE WEST. John Harja Senior Counsel on Detail to the Public Lands Office

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

Cabinet-Yaak / Selkirk Mountains 2016 Grizzly Bear Monitoring

Susquehanna University and the PFBC Unassessed Waters Initiative in the Susquehanna Basin Jonathan M. Niles Mike Bilger

What was the historic coaster fishery like?

Volume 2: Comments and Responses on the Draft Bison and Elk Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement. Teton County, Wyoming

Results of the 2015 nontidal Potomac River watershed Smallmouth Bass Young of Year Survey

GUIDED HUNT CONTRACT

Dauphin Lake Fishery. Status of Walleye Stocks and Conservation Measures

Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Annual Performance Report of Survey-Inventory Activities 1 July June IS 0 N

DMU 008 Barry County Deer Management Unit

Lookout Mountain Ranch

Transcription:

Sublette Moose Project! 2014 Capture Report F67 makes her way back to the willows of Horse Creek after being released from capture. PROJECT BACKGROUND In February 2011, we began research on Shiras moose (Alces alces shirasi) in the Hoback Basin to evaluate demography, movement and nutrition of the largest population of Shiras moose in the continental US. The project continued to evolve in response to potential energy development that may still occur in the region (i.e., 44-7 leasing zone). Although moose are relatively abundant in the 44-7 leasing zone, very little is known about their demography or habitat use. Consequently, we expanded the geographic scope of this project to aid WGFD in understanding and mitigating moose responses to energy development, should it occur. Further, our study is providing comprehensive data on the demographic consequences of nutritional condition, disease and predation for this important Wyoming moose herd. F29 plows through the deep snow of South Beaver Crk. On to the next moose!

DATA COLLECTION This year marked the fourth consecutive capture effort for the project and was funded largely by generous landowners in the study area. The weather was not particularly cooperative this year, forcing us to spread 40 captures over February 10 th, 11 th, 12 th, and 17 th. We recorded calf recruitment for 37 recaptured females as well as 3 newly captured moose along North Horse Creek. The data we collected will inform the USFS-Bridger Teton of moose movement and nutritional condition as they prepare to make a final decision for the 44-7 leasing zone. A B C Similar to previous years, we measured nutritional condition using ultrasonography (A); took body measurements to estimate body mass (B); collected blood samples for pregnancy and Elaeophora testing (C); downloaded location data from GPS collars (D) and added new VHF collars to 25 females (E). Photos by Mark Gocke (WGFD). E D

CAPTURE LOCATIONS Along the Wyoming Range front, moose tend to congregate on winter ranges characterized by expansive willow bottoms in the creeks of Horse, Cottonwood, Beaver and the Green River. These watersheds comprise some of the most significant Shiras moose habitat in the Rocky Mountains, highlighting the need to maintain and conserve their migratory routes and seasonal ranges. With the PXP leasing zone now retired, we have shifted our focus on moose that could potentially use the 44-7 leasing zone. This year, we captured 3 new females along North Horse Creek to augment our sample size for demographic analyses. The table and map below show locations of captured females and our observations of calf recruitment. Each location is labeled with an identification number followed by a c or - (e.g., F42c or F85--) to indicate calf presence or absence at time of capture. Drainage: Numbered Captured: Hoback Basin & Beaver Crk. Green River Horse Crk. Co4onwood Crk. Total 7 6 17 10 40 WYOMING Capture Area

NUTRITION During summer, moose spend much of their time foraging on willow and aspen leaves in an effort to regain fat reserves lost over the winter. Similar to previous years, nutritional condition of adult females was low overall (mean=6.1%), suggesting that poor habitat quality is still resulting in low rates of pregnancy and adult survival. Percent Body Fat Percent Body Fat per Year n=48 n=65 n=40 Below: Dr. Kevin Monteith measures F40 s body fat in Horse Creek using ultrasonography. The image on the right shows where body fat is deposited below the skin. She carried a total of 6.8% body fat, slightly higher than the population average (6.2%), but was not pregnant in 2012 or 2013. Skin layer Rump Fat Year Mark Gocke EMI Imaging Fig. 1: Boxplots showing nutritional condition of adult females per year captured (Black bars represent sample means). Winter severity can create a lag effect on nutritional condition. The winter of 2010/2011 was notably harsh along the Wyoming Range, possibly creating more variation in percent body fat observed in 2012. ANNUAL CALF SURVIVAL Females that gave birth to a calf last summer (June 2013) were monitored for annual calf survival, which was high (75%) see table below for survival proportions according to drainage of capture. This suggests that high calf survival may be compensating for depressed annual rates of pregnancy (<75% annually) and adult survival (<88%). Hoback Basin Drainage of Capture Proportion North Hoback/Beaver Creek: 6/7 Green River: 2/4 Cottonwood Creek Horse Creek: 5/6 South Cottonwood Creek: 5/6 Total: 18/23

WY Game & Fish Commissioner Charles Price helps prepare F40 s release. Sam Dwinnell of the WY Coop Unit prepares a penicillin dose for F13 near Middle Beaver Creek. Maggie Miller and Patty Roberts keep F65 company in Cottonwood Creek. Measurements and samples collected, F67 is released in Horse Creek. Dr. Matt Kauffman stores a blood sample from F40 in Horse Creek. Dr. Kevin Monteith and Gary Fralick release F53 near the rim in the Hoback Basin.

Acknowledgements We are sincerely grateful to the numerous landowners that supported this capture operation, both financially and logistically. Securing sufficient funding is always a challenge and without the generous contributions provided by individuals and organizations, this fourth year of data collection would not have been possible. Many thanks to Finley Resources, Rolling Thunder Ranch LLC, Ricketts Conservation Foundation, Sublette County Outfitters and Guides Association Inc., Wyoming Outfitters and Guides Association, Wyoming Game and Fish Department, Bridger-Teton National Forest, Wyoming Governor s Office, Wyoming Governor s Big Game License Coalition, and Plains Exploration and Production Company. For more information, contact: Brendan Oates (boates1@uwyo.edu) or Gary Fralick, WGFD (gary.fralick@wyo.gov)