CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement. Electoral Engagement Among Minority Youth

Similar documents
CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement. Civic Engagement Among Minority Youth

America s Diversity Explosion: What it means for Presidential Politics. WILLIAM H. FREY Brookings Institution and University of Michigan

GALLUP NEWS SERVICE 2018 MIDTERM ELECTION

TRENDS IN PARTICIPATION RATES FOR WILDLIFE-ASSOCIATED RECREATION BY RACE/ETHNICITY AND GENDER:

Demographic Change in North Carolina

A Virtual Dead Heat In Campaign s Final Days

The American Electorate of the 21st Century. Morley Winograd and Michael D. Hais NDN Fellows and Co-authors of Millennial Makeover

Purpose. The purpose of our paper is to analyze changes in the American electorate and how they are changing the American party system itself.

Daron Shaw Department of Government University of Texas at Austin

Nebraska Births Report: A look at births, fertility rates, and natural change

The Effect of Newspaper Entry and Exit on Electoral Politics Matthew Gentzkow, Jesse M. Shapiro, and Michael Sinkinson Web Appendix

BUSH MARGIN WIDENS AGAIN, DESPITE VULNERABILITIES

The 2018 FIU Cuba Poll: How Cuban-Americans in Miami View U.S. Policies toward Cuba

Bush Leads on More Attributes Heading Into the Final Debate

Today. Decline of Parties. Machines New Deal Realignment. In Electorate In Nominations In Government?

Three Strikes Analysis:

Who votes is a key question to understanding electoral politics in the United States. Answering

Changing Demographics in the U.S. and the Impact on Congress

Chapter 2 Displaying and Describing Categorical Data

More Interest in GOP Platform than Romney s Speech

FOR RELEASE: THURSDAY, MARCH 2 AT 4 PM

Introduction to the American Political Process. Political Participation

Wildlife Ad Awareness & Attitudes Survey 2015

PEW RESEARCH CENTER FOR THE PEOPLE & THE PRESS LATE OCTOBER 2008 POLITICAL SURVEY FINAL TOPLINE October 23-26, 2008 N=1500

2016 National Post-Election Study

Liberals with steady 10 point lead on Conservatives

Report to the Benjamin Hair-Just Swim For Life Foundation on JACS4 The Jefferson Area Community Survey

THE AP-GfK POLL July, 2016

GROWING INEQUALITY AND ITS IMPACTS: Bulgaria and Romania

WORLD. Geographic Trend Report for GMAT Examinees

On Eve of Newtown Recommendations, Most Back New Gun Control Measures

WHERE ARE ARIZONA DEMOGRAPHICS TAKING US? HOW GROWING SLOWER, OLDER AND MORE DIVERSE AFFECTS REAL ESTATE

2007 FIU Cuba Poll. Florida International University. Cuban Research Institute

Keeping Gulf Red Snapper on the Road to Recovery

Central Hills Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G9 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results

Results of a National Survey: Views of the American Public about the Use of Torture

Gonzales Research & Marketing Strategies

Transportation Issues Poll for New York City

Northwest Parkland-Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G7 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results

RANDOMIZE Q.1 AND Q.2/Q.2a ASK ALL: Q.1 All in all, are you satisfied or dissatisfied with the way things are going in this country today?

THE I-79 CORRIDOR. I-79 provides motorists with connections to the following major highways: I-80, PA 358, PA 965 and PA 208.

Habit Formation in Voting: Evidence from Rainy Elections Thomas Fujiwara, Kyle Meng, and Tom Vogl ONLINE APPENDIX

Surging New Democrats pull into the lead

South Africa: Seeds of Electoral Change?

Briefing Paper #1. An Overview of Regional Demand and Mode Share

RUTGERS FOOTBALL MAJORITY SAY IT CAN IMPROVE STATE IMAGE WANT BIG TIME FOOTBALL

The Economic Status of Women in the U.S. What Has Changed in the Last Years

Media, Polarization, and the 2016 Election. Matthew Gentzkow

Kantar Public Election Talk: German Election. Is Merkel s reelection a forgone conclusion?

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, February 2014, Public Skeptical of Decision to Hold Olympic Games in Russia

AP UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS COURSE SYLLABUS TEXTBOOKS

St. Augustine, FL Trends over Time

Aug , 2006 N= 1,206

HART RESEARCH ASSOCIATES/PUBLIC OPINION STRATEGIES Study # page 1

International Fund for Animal Welfare. Research on Attitudes toward Commercial Whaling. Conducted by: Benenson Strategy Group April 2012

1999 On-Board Sacramento Regional Transit District Survey

Marist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY Phone Fax

POLL. July 20-22, 2007 N= 889

Bush Bounce Begins, But Cheney Could Cause Concern

The Red & Blue Nation

REPORT. RECOMMENDATION: 1. That the report on Pilot Results Free Transit for Seniors, dated October 25, 2012, from Oakville Transit be received.

The New York Times/CBS News Poll September 12-16, 2004

Republican VP Poll 7/8/2016 Newsmax. 605 (weighted)

UNITED STATES NATIONAL PUBLIC OPINION DECEMBER 2017

Uber ridership up since last year

The New York Times/CBS News Poll October 28-30, 2004

Summer Flounder. Wednesday, April 26, Powered by

"Daily Polling" FIELDWORK DATES: 26TH - 27TH OCTOBER 2014

What HQ2 Finalist Cities Think about Amazon Moving to Town. Table of Contents

Nebraska s Population and Economic Trends

1 PEW RESEARCH CENTER

West Virginia Voters on the Elk River Spill and Environmental Protections

TRUMP GETS OK GRADES FOR NORTH KOREA SUMMIT, QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY NATIONAL POLL FINDS; BUT TWO-THIRDS OF U.S. VOTERS SAY NO NOBEL PRIZE

March 14, Public Opinion Survey Results: Restoration of Wild Bison in Montana

Program Review. Computer Business Applications. Prepared By GWC Office of Institutional Effectiveness

NC Demographic Trends Through 2035

National Wildlife Federation. Lori Weigel, Public Opinion Strategies. Al Quinlan, Greenberg Quinlan Rosner

2009 New Brunswick Gambling Prevalence Study

Population & Demographics

U.S. VOTERS DISLIKE TRUMP ALMOST 2-1, QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY NATIONAL POLL FINDS; MEDIA IS IMPORTANT TO DEMOCRACY, 65% OF VOTERS SAY

PEW RESEARCH CENTER FOR THE PEOPLE & THE PRESS JULY 2007 POLITICAL SURVEY / MEDIA UPDATE FINAL TOPLINE July 25-29, 2007 N=1,503

IEEJ:November 2018 IEEJ2018 American Views on Energy and Trade Bruce Stokes Director, Global Economic Attitudes Tokyo, November 12, 2018

2016 Capital Bikeshare Member Survey Report

ASK ALL: How much thought have you given to the coming presidential election... Quite a lot or only a little?

U.S. VOTERS BELIEVE ANONYMOUS TRUMP CHARGES 2-1, QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY NATIONAL POLL FINDS; VOTERS ARE HIGH ON ECONOMY, SPLIT ON KAVANAUGH

LATINO VOTE A Fight For Change!

Political Forecast for 2016

Stalemate Continues: CONSERVATIVES HOLD SLIGHT ADVANTAGE AMONG EARLY VOTERS

NC Demographic Trends Through 2035

Legalizing Sports Betting: A Winning Wager

Liberal Budget Gains Disappear

Growth Trends in Hampton Roads

Staff 89.6% of teachers hold master s degrees or above. The average number of years of teaching experience for our certified staff is 14.

NATIONAL: SUPPORT FOR CIRCUS ANIMAL BAN

Sept , N= 936 Registered Voters= 844

Marist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY Phone Fax

NEW YORK CITY VOTERS LIKE CUOMO MORE THAN de BLASIO, QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY POLL FINDS; VOTERS SAY NO TO HORSE BAN, YES TO CELL PHONES IN SCHOOL

August Final Report. Public Opinions of Endangered and Invasive Species in Florida. Erica Odera & Dr. Alexa Lamm PIE2012/13-13.

EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: Sunday, October 14 at 9:00 a.m.

Confidence Intervals with proportions

Transcription:

FACT SHEET CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement Electoral Engagement Among Minority Youth By Mark Hugo Lopez, Research Director and Emily Kirby, Research Associate 1 July 2005 9 8 7 6 5 2 1 Graph 1: Racial and Ethnic Composition of Young U.S. Citizens Ages 18-24, 1972 to 2004 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 White, NH Citizen Black, NH Citizen, C itizen Asian, NH Citizen Native American, NH Citizen Mixed Race C itizen Source: Current Population Survey, November Supplements, 1972-2004. Youth voter turnout increased substantially in the 2004 presidential election. According to estimates from numerous sources, young people increased, relative to 2000, the number of votes they cast and their overall voter turnout rate. 2 This general trend in increased voter participation also appears to extend to all racial and ethnic minority groups. This fact sheet presents data on the characteristics of the youth population and youth voting trends through 2004 by race and ethnicity. Growing Racial and Ethnic Diversity among Young People The racial/ethnic composition of the youth population has shifted in recent years. Between 1972 and 2004, the percentage of young citizens who are white has steadily fallen from approximately 87 percent in 1972 to approximately 62 percent in 2004. During the same period, the percentage of young citizens who are has grown almost 10 percentage points from 5 percent in 1976 to 12 percent in 2004. Since 1972, the -American population has remained relatively stable at 12% to 15% of the citizen population. Graph 1 displays the trend in the composition of the youth citizen population since 1972. 3 In 2004, there were an estimated 3.6 million young non-hispanic -Americans citizens 4 between the ages of 18 and 24. This compares to an estimated 16.8 million young non-hispanic white citizens and 3 million young citizens. 5 When non-citizens are included, the size of the youth population is 4.9 million, larger than the resident non-hispanic -American population (3.8 million). School of Public Policy 2101 Van Munching Hall University of Maryland College Park, MD 20742-1821 P: 301 405 2790 F: 301 314 9346 W: www.civicyouth.org CIRCLE was founded in 2001 with a generous grant from The Pew Charitable Trusts and is now also funded by the Carnegie Corporation of New York. CIRCLE is based in the University of Maryland's School of Public Policy.

2 Voter Turnout In 2004, youth voter turnout increased substantially and much of this increase was driven by an increase in voting among -American youth. -American turnout fell off in the 1988 election and remained relatively stable until the 2004 election, in which -Americans experienced a jump in turnout of more than 11 percentage points over 2000 the greatest increase in turnout of any racial or ethnic minority group during the recent election cycle. Fortyseven percent of -Americans voted in 2004, their highest level in three decades, just 2.5 percentage points fewer than whites. While -Americans experienced noteworthy increases in turnout over the past decade, other racial and ethnic groups also made significant strides. Turnout among whites increased by nearly 12 percentage points while Asians, s, and Native Americans ages 18 to 24 all experienced gains of five to ten percentage points since the 2000 election. Asians age 18-29 comprised the only group that experienced significant declines since 2000, and now have the lowest turnout percentage in that age category. Also, the turnout among the youngest Asian cohort those aged 18-24 increased to only 1996 levels in 2004. While Asians had the second greatest percentage turnout of any ethnic group in 1996, they sank to the secondlowest, just ahead of s and behind Native Americans, in 2004. (See Table 1 in the appendix for a table with turnout figures by race/ethnicity.) 7 6 5 2 1 Graph 2: 18-24 Year Old C itizen Voter Turnout by Race, Presidential Years 1972 1976 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 18-24 White,NH 18-24 Black, NH 18-24 18-24 Asian, NH 18-24 Native American, NH 18-24 Mixed Race Source: CPS November Voting and Registrat ion Supplements, 1972 to 2004. 7 6 5 2 1 Graph 3: Old C itizen Voter Turnout by Race, Presidential Years 1972 1976 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 18-29 White,NH 18-29 Black, NH 18-29 18-29 Asian, NH 18-29 Native American, NH 18-29 Mixed Race Source: CPS November Voting and Registrat ion Supplements, 1972 to 2004.

3 In midterm elections, the trend has been just the opposite. Native Americans were only about half as likely to vote in the 2002 Congressional elections as in 1994. s, Asians, and whites have also experienced significant falloffs in turnout over the past two cycles. The only group to experience any gains in midterm elections was -Americans. Black youth were more likely to vote in 2002 than any other race. Graph 4: 18-24 Year Old C itizen Voter Turnout by Race, Midterm Years Graph 5: Old C itizen Voter Turnout by Race, Midterm Years 35% 35% 25% 25% 2 2 15% 15% 1 1 5% 5% 1974 1978 1982 1986 1990 1994 1998 2002 1974 1978 1982 1986 1990 1994 1998 2002 18-24 White,NH 18-24 Black, NH 18-24 18-24 Asian, NH 18-24 Native American, NH 18-29 White,NH 18-29 Black, NH 18-29 18-29 Asian, NH 18-29 Native American, NH Source: CPS November Vot ing and Regist rat ion Supplement s, 1972 t o 2004. Source: CPS November Voting and Registrat ion Supplements, 1972 to 2004.

4 Support for Presidential Candidates in 2004 Along with voters age 75 or, voters ages 18 to 29 were the only other age group to support John Kerry in last fall s presidential election. 6 However, while young people supported Kerry overall, that support was driven by the very strong support of -American youth and the strong support of youth. All -American voters supported Kerry by a margin of 88 percent to 11 percent; that margin was the same for young and -Americans. All voters supported Kerry 53 percent to 44 percent with support for Kerry stronger among young s (58 percent to 40 percent) than among s 30 and (52 percent to 45 percent). 7 However, White non-hispanic voters supported George W. Bush. For those White non- Hispanic voters between the ages of 18 and 29, the margin was 55 percent for Bush to 44 percent for Kerry; among those 30 and, the margin was 59 percent to 40 percent. Voter support percentages for Bush and Kerry are displayed in Graphs 6 and 7, and Table 2 in the appendix. Graph 6: Old Voters, 2004 Support for Presidential Candidates Graph 7: 30 and Older Voters, 2004 Support for Presidential Candidates 10 9 88% 10 9 88% 8 8 7 6 5 44% 55% 58% 54% 45% 7 6 5 59% 52% 45% 52% 47% 2 1 12% 2 1 11% White, NH American, NH Kerry Bush Source: 2004 National Exit Poll f rom the Nat ional Election Pool. All Voters 18-29 White, NH American, NH Kerry All Voters 30 and Bush Source: 2004 National Exit Poll from t he National Elect ion Pool.

5 Political Party Identification Young -Americans voters were the most likely to identify themselves as Democrats and least likely to identify as Republican in the 2004 presidential election. About one fifth of white, -American, and youth identified as Independent. 10 9 8 7 6 Graph 8: Old Voters, 2004 Political Party Identification 7 8 Graph 9: White Youth Ages 15-25 are Most Likely to View Voting as Important 5 2 1 28% 44% 21% 7% White, NH 19% 8% 3% American, NH 43% 21% 22% 14% 35% 34% 21% 7% All Voters 18-29 Democrat Republican Independent Something Else Source: 2004 Nat ional Exit Poll f rom t he Nat ional Elect ion Pool. Views on Voting 7 6 5 2 1 57% 43% 44% 56% 48% 59% In 2004 CIRCLE in collaboration with the Center for Democracy and Citizenship at the Council for Excellence in Government commissioned a survey of over 1,000 15-25 year olds called the 2004 National Youth Survey. The next section of the fact sheet presents findings from this survey. White youth are most likely to view voting as important. Less than half of -American and youth view voting as important. White Important American Not Important Source: CIRCLE/Council for Excellence in Government National Youth Survey, Jan 2004

6 Research has shown that attitudes can be a predictor of voting. For example, young people who feel that they can make a difference, or feel efficacious, are more likely to vote. However, according to the 2004 National Youth Survey, less than half of young people reported that they felt they could make a difference in their community which may partially explain why some young people chose not to vote. Young -Americans and s reported feeling less efficacious than their young white counterparts. 8 Graph 10: A Majority of Youth Ages 15-25 Feel They Can Make Little Difference in Solving the Problems of Their Communities 7 6 5 49% 51% 63% 61% 37% 39% Graph 11: Talked About Politics with Parents, Young People Ages 15-25 2 8 1 7 63% White American 6 5 52% 47% 47% 52% Great Deal/ Some A Little/Almost No/ No 37% Source: CIRCLE/Council f or Excellence in Government National Youth Survey, Jan 2004 Discussing politics with parents also is correlated with higher voting rates. young people are least likely to have discussed politics with their parents. 2 1 White Often/Sometimes American Not Often/ Never Source: CIRCLE/ Council for Excellence in Government National Youth Survey, Jan 2004

7 Appendix Table 1A: Voter Turnout Among White, Non-Hispanics Citizens, 1972-2004 8 18-24 Year 25 and 30 and Midterm Election Years 1974 27. 53.4% 31.1% 55.9% 1978 26. 55.8% 30.3% 58.8% 1982 26.8% 58.7% 32.3% 61.8% 1986 23.8% 55.1% 28.2% 58.5% 1990 23.7% 55.3% 28.1% 58.4% 1994 23.5% 54.7% 27.6% 57.2% 1998 19.5% 51. 23. 53.4% 2002 20.4% 52.7% 23.4% 54.9% Presidential Election Years 1972 54.2% 69.5% 57.1% 70.6% 1976 47.5% 67.3% 51.7% 68.7% 1980 46.4% 70.3% 50.9% 72.3% 1984 45.5% 70.2% 50.3% 72.5% 1988 41.3% 67.7% 45.6% 70.2% 1992 52. 72.6% 54.9% 74.4% 1996 37.7% 63.7% 41.4% 65.6% 2000 38.1% 65. 42. 66.6% 2004 49.8% 69.4% 52.3% 70.6% Table 1B: Voter Turnout Among -American, Non-Hispanics Citizens, 1972-2004 9 18-24 Year 25 and 30 and Midterm Election Years 1974 17.5% 40.4% 21.6% 42.2% 1978 21.6% 44.5% 25.2% 47. 1982 27.1% 50.7% 31.2% 53.5% 1986 26.6% 50.1% 30.8% 52.8% 1990 21.6% 46.9% 26.7% 49.4% 1994 18.3% 43.1% 22.7% 45.3% 1998 16.9% 46.5% 23.2% 48.7% 2002 20.7% 46.7% 24.8% 48.7% Presidential Election Years 1972 37.5% 59.1% 42.7% 60.1% 1976 29.8% 56.4% 35.5% 58.4% 1980 32.4% 59.9% 38.6% 62.1%

8 1984 44.1% 65.1% 48.3% 67.3% 1988 37.8% 58.9% 39.4% 62.3% 1992 40.6% 63. 45.2% 64.8% 1996 33.8% 56.7% 39. 58.3% 2000 36.2% 60.9% 42. 62.2% 2004 47.3% 62.8% 49.5% 64.1% Table 1C: Voter Turnout Among Citizens, 1972-2004 10 18-24 Year 25 and 30 and Midterm Election Years 1974 18. 37. 19.3% 40.4% 1978 16.9% 41.8% 21.6% 44.9% 1982 21.4% 43.7% 22.5% 47.9% 1986 18.6% 43.2% 22.5% 46.9% 1990 16.4% 40.3% 20.4% 43.2% 1994 18. 37.8% 19.6% 40.8% 1998 14.7% 37.3% 17.6% 39.6% 2002 13.2% 35.2% 15.7% 37.3% Presidential Election Years 1976 28.6% 48.3% 32. 50.7% 1980 25.6% 52.5% 30.2% 56.1% 1984 32.6% 55.1% 35.5% 59. 1988 28.3% 53. 33.4% 55.8% 1992 33.1% 55.8% 38.9% 57.4% 1996 24. 48.8% 28.4% 51.2% 2000 25.6% 49.7% 29.4% 51.7% 2004 33. 50.5% 35.5% 52.3% Table 1D: Voter Turnout Among Asian, Non-Hispanics Citizens, 1972-2004 11 18-24 Year 25 and 30 and Midterm Election Years 1990 27. 42.3% 27.1% 44.8% 1994 20.5% 42.6% 22.6% 44.8% 1998 16.6% 35. 16.5% 37.5% 2002 15.1% 33.7% 15.8% 35.8% Presidential Election Years 1992 31.7% 58. 36.9% 59.9% 1996 35. 47.8% 34.3% 50. 2000 27.8% 46. 31.8% 47.1% 2004 35.5% 45.9% 32.4% 48.1%

9 Table 1E: Voter Turnout Among Native American, Non-Hispanics Citizens, 1972-2004 12 18-24 Year 25 and 30 and Midterm Election Years 1990 13.2% 40.4% 13. 44.8% 1994 24.6% 39.1% 25.3% 41.4% 1998 11.2% 38.8% 16.6% 42.6% 2002 11.3% 35.5% 14.5% 37.5% Presidential Election Years 1992 36.5% 56. 35.8% 58.9% 1996 25. 49.5% 27.5% 52.8% 2000 30.1% 49.5% 30.2% 52.3% 2004 36.6% 50.8% 35.4% 53.1% Table 1F: Voter Turnout Among Mixed Race, Non-Hispanics Citizens, 1972-2004 13 18-24 Year 25 and 30 and 2004 45.8% 62.8% 46.4% 65.3%

10 Table 2 Support for Kerry and Bush by Racial/Ethnic Group and Age November 2004 National Exit Poll White, NH -American, NH All Voters Voters Ages 18 to 24 John Kerry 48% 89% 55% 56% George W. Bush 51% 1 43% 43% Margin of Error 3.2% points 4.4% points 6.8% points 2.5% points Voters Ages 18 to 29 John Kerry 44% 88% 58% 54% George W. Bush 55% 12% 45% Margin of Error 2.3% points 3.1% points 5.1% points 1.9% points Voters Ages 30 and Older John Kerry 89% 52% 47% George W. Bush 59% 11% 45% 52% Margin of Error 1% point 1.8% points 3.9% points 0.9% points All Voters Ages 18 and Older John Kerry 41% 88% 53% 48% George W. Bush 58% 11% 44% 51% Margin of Error 1% point 1.6% points 3% points 0.6% points Source: Author s tabulation, National Election Pool November 2004 National Exit Poll.

11 Notes 1 We thank Michael Olander for excellent research assistance. We also thank Bill Galston, Deborah Both, Carrie Donovan and Peter Levine for helpful comments on previous drafts of this fact sheet. All errors in fact or interpretation are our own. 2 For more information on youth voting rates see CIRCLE Fact Sheet The Youth Vote 2004. For information on how CIRCLE calculates voter turnout rates please see CIRCLE Working Paper 35: The Youth Vote 2004: With a Historical Look at Youth Voting Patterns, 1972-2004. 3 We have defined racial/ethnic groups in the 2004 CPS November Supplements by defining anyone with Hispanic background as, single race or ethnicity individuals who are non-hispanic as white, -American, Asian American or Native American, and those of mixed race/ethnicity as a separate category. Since 2003, the CPS has allowed survey participants to mark more than once racial/ethnic category in describing their backgrounds. This potentially means that 2000 and 2004 may not be entirely comparable when identifying race and ethnicity categories of survey respondents. Prior to 1990, the Current Population Survey allowed individuals to categorize their race/ethnicity as other. Those classifications have been suppressed here since it is unclear what race/ethnicity people who identified themselves as other are. All programs used to generate race and ethnicity variables are available from the authors upon request. 4 All results are for non-hispanic -Americans, non-hispanic whites, and s. 5 These figures are estimates of the number of non-institutionalized young people in the U.S. Estimates are based on the 2004 November supplement of the Current Population Survey. 6 Exit polls are a good data source for estimating youth support for a particular candidate. We have chosen to present data on 18-29 year olds as opposed to 18-24 year olds since the sample sizes are larger and likely give a more accurate estimate. 7 There is some controversy regarding the accuracy of presidential support estimates from this year s National Election Pool Exit Polls. Specifically, in the National Exit Poll, conservative s may be over-represented. For more discussion on some of the controversy surrounding the representation of voters in the 2004 National Exit Poll, see Roberto Suro, Richard Fry, and Jeffrey Passel Hispanics and the 2004 Election: Population, Electorate and Voters. 8 See Endnote #3 9 See Endnote #3 10 See Endnote #3 11 See Endnote #3 12 See Endnote #3 13 See Endnote #3