TERM CONTRACT FOR THE MANAGEMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF THE SCOTTISH TRUNK ROAD NETWORK NORTH EAST UNIT

Similar documents
M9/A90/M90 Edinburgh to Fraserburgh Trunk Road. A90 Tealing. Moving Cursor Programme Junction Study

NORTH EAST UNIT 17/NE/0801/013. A90 Tealing Junction. Accident Investigation Study

SH1, Karo Drive Wellington Crash Reduction Study

Collision Site Investigation - Bodenham By-Pass Background

Speed Limit Policy Isle of Wight Council

Lincolnshire JSNA: Road Traffic Accidents

SLOUGH Stage 3 Road Safety Audit of A4 London Road, M4 J5 to Sutton Lane

BLYTHEWOOD PARK, BROMLEY

// RoWSaF Making roads safer for road workers rowsaf.org.uk. RoWSaF Strategy 2015

A465 Heads of the Valleys Dualling Sections 5 and 6 Dowlais Top to Hirwaun SUMMARY PROOF OF EVIDENCE. Highways Engineering Document WG 1.3.

Corporate. Report COUNCIL DATE: May 25, 1998 NO: R1500 REGULAR COUNCIL. TO: Mayor & Council DATE: April 27, 1998

Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Road Safety Partnership Handbook

The Cabinet Member for Highways & Streetscene. Aurang Zeb - Head of Highways & Transport

Cycle journeys on the South-West City Way: a descriptive analysis. Karen McPherson. Glasgow Centre for Population Health

MILTON ROAD ~ MITCHAM'S CORNER PARAMICS MODEL INITIAL OPTION TESTING

TS 109 DURHAM ROAD QTC PHASE 4 PROJECT PROPOSAL. Page 1

1 VicRoads Access Management Policies May 2006 Ver VicRoads Access Management Policies May 2006 Version 1.02

CASUALTY REVIEW

London Safety Camera Partnership

Background. The scale of the problem. The scale of the problem. Road Safety in London, the statistics. 280 Fatalities from road crashes in 2002

Kings Road, Herne Bay: Proposed Crash Remedial Measure

APPENDIX F: TECHNICAL NOTE 22 (VICARAGE ROAD JUNCTION)

Draft letter to Designers and Managing Agents INTERIM ADVICE NOTE 43/02: CANTILEVER AND PORTAL GANTRY VMS

20mph Speed Limit Trial Warrington Borough Council. Mark Tune Traffic Management & Road Safety Manager

Managed Motorways All Lanes Running

Appendix A Type of Traffic Calming Measures Engineering Solutions

Christchurch City Council Assets & Network Unit Transport Technical Services & Design

Road Safety Audits of Traffic Signal Schemes

CASUALTY REVIEW

Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Road Safety Partnership Handbook

Bramshaw traffic calming proposal

Safer Roads Humber Annual Safety Camera Progress Report April 2010 March 2011

Frequently asked questions (FAQ) about a borough-wide 20 mph speed limit

AT403.1 Ancient monument Note 3 amended P500 Basic triangle New size 1800mm added

Mill Hill Broadway Capacity Improvement

CYCLING SCOTLAND SCOTTISH CHARITY NO.SCO Annual Cycling Monitoring Report

SOMERSET ROAD SAFETY PARTNERSHIP CASUALTY REVIEW Working together to reduce casualties

CAIRNGORMS NATIONAL PARK AUTHORITY FOR DECISION

To: The results of these surveys have been analysed and are summarised within this Technical Note.

Improving the A1 in Northumberland Public consultation. November December North of Ellingham

Road Safety Partnership

IMPACT OF THE BERMUDA CONNECTIVITY PROJECT ON CYCLING

PROCEDURE Road Traffic Collisions (Recording) Number: H 0601 Date Published: 24 May 2016

R J Tunbridge and J T Everest Transport and Road Research Laboratory CROWTHORNE, England

Traffic Sensitive Streets. Guidance Notes. GeoPlace Streets Team. Traffic Sensitive Streets. Guidance Note Page 1 of 7.

NRA New Divided Road Types: Type 2 and Type 3 Dual-carriageways

6. BREENS/GARDINERS/HAREWOOD INTERSECTION - SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

Sevenways Roundabout, and the need for a Road Safety Scheme:

Napier City road trauma for Napier City. Road casualties Estimated social cost of crashes* Major road safety issues.

Amendments to Essex Highway Maintenance Strategy Maintenance Policy and Standards April 2008

Aiming for Zero Road Worker Safety. Mark Pooley Highways Agency Road Worker Safety Programme Manager Monday 11 June 2012

Richmond-Adelaide Cycle Tracks

The Joint Report of the Bus Lane Adjudicators

Crash Patterns in Western Australia. Kidd B., Main Roads Western Australia Willett P., Traffic Research Services

72 Crossrail Amendment of Provisions

Proposed Strategic Housing Development at the Former Doyle s Nursery and Garden Centre and Benoni, Brennanstown Road, Cabinteely, Dublin 18

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY March 2013

EUROPEAN TRANSPORT CONFERENCE 2006 ROAD SAFETY IN LONDON PAST SUCCESSES AND FUTURE INNOVATIONS

CAMBRIDGE SOUTH WEST PARK & RIDE

Research for MfS2 High Risk Collision Sites and Y Distance Visibility

A127/A130 Fairglen Interchange Improvement Schemes. Information Leaflet February 2017

Bicycle - Motor Vehicle Collisions on Controlled Access Highways in Arizona

From Mile Zero to Target Zero the Dawson Creek Case Study

BENNING ROAD & BRIDGES TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS CRASH DATA AND SAFETY ANALYSIS TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM DRAFT MAY 2016

5. The speed camera site outside the Parkwood Rest Home opposite Linwood College is a valuable deterrent. The speed camera site should be retained.

HIGH STREET & ROYAL AVENUE TRAFFIC SURVEY

Our Approach to Managing Level Crossing Safety Our Policy

Appendix D Stage 1 Road Safety Audit

Appendix B Transportation Report

Walking and Cycling Action Plan Summary. A Catalyst for Change The Regional Transport Strategy for the west of Scotland

Improving Cyclist Safety at the Dundas Street West and Sterling Road Intersection

Cuddington Traffic Calming

Traffic Calming Policy

Report to Cabinet. 18 May 2016

NRA New Divided Road Types: Type 2 and Type 3 Dual - Carriageways

Local Highway Panels Members Guide. 5 Crossing Facilities

Version 7 October Utilisation Strategy for Speed Camera Enforcement

Truck Climbing Lane Traffic Justification Report

ENFIELD TOWN THE REVISED DESIGN

Safe Working On Roads Standard Operating Procedures

CITY OF WEST LAKE HILLS. Forest View Neighborhood Traffic Calming Study

Maynooth Traffic Management Plan & Traffic Model

Setting Local Speed Limits. A review of recent installations of 20mph area schemes (signage only).

PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION

Generic Safe Method for placing TTM on MM-ALR

4. WIDER SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH

Appendix 5B Accessway standards and guidelines Appendix 5B Accessway standards and guidelines

EUROPEAN ROAD ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME EuroRAP I (2003) TECHNICAL REPORT

SHOTLEY BRIDGE VILLAGE TRUST

School Bus Safety in Australia Newman, Shannon L., & Tziotis, Michael, (ARRB Transport Research Ltd).

Welcome. Knutsford to Bowdon Improvement. Start of works exhibition November An executive agency of the Department for Transport

MEETING CHIPPING BARNET AREA ENVIRONMENT SUB-COMMITTEE DATE AND TIME WEDNESDAY 13 MARCH, 2013 AT 7.00 PM VENUE 1255 HIGH ROAD, WHETSTONE, N20 0EJ

Safety impacts of pedestrian crossing configurations and other features of signalized junctions on public transport routes

The Wincheap Society

A6 Manchester Airport Relief Road

ASSET MANAGEMENT & SCRIM: A TARGETED APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF SKIDDING RESISTANCE

Cork City Council Morrison s Island Public Realm and Flood Defence Project Transport Assessment

SCHEME DESIGN AND ENGINEERING

Cycling Safety Review. (April 2017)

M42 MM Monitoring and Evaluation

Transcription:

TERM CONTRACT FOR THE MANAGEMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF THE SCOTTISH TRUNK ROAD NETWORK NORTH EAST UNIT A90 LAURENCEKIRK ROAD SAFETY SCHEME MONITORING STUDY Client: Transport Scotland Trunk Road and Bus Operations Buchanan House, 58 Port Dundas Road, Glasgow G4 0HF Prepared By: BEAR Scotland Limited Inveralmond Road Inveralmond Ind. Estate Perth PH1 3TW This is an unpublished report prepared for the Transport Scotland, Trunk Road and Bus Operations Division (TRBO) and must not be referred to in any publication without the permission of TRBO. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of TRBO. Transport Scotland March 2014

Page: 2 Name Signature Date Prepared By Frank Mills Frank Mills 11/03/2014 Checked By Bob Blair Bob Blair 11/03/2014 Authorised By Alan Campbell Alan Campbell 14/03/2014 REVISION STATUS REV. Date Revision Details Checked Authorised 1 18/03/14 Incorporating Client comments Bob Blair Alan Campbell 2 27/03/14 Incorporating Client Comments Bob Blair Alan Campbell CONTROLLED DOCUMENT HOLDERS Ref. Name of Holder 1 TS Stephen Davies Electronic copy 2 Frank Mills BEAR Scotland Ltd 3 BEAR Scotland Ltd AIP File

Page: 3 CONTENTS Page 1 Introduction 4 2 Site Description 4 3 Study Purpose and Methodology 5 4 Collision Analysis 7 5 Consultations 12 6 Conclusions 12 7 Recommendations 13 Appendices Appendix A Collision Plan Appendix B First Year Rate of Return Calculation

Page: 4 1. INTRODUCTION This report has been prepared by BEAR Scotland Ltd in response to an instruction from Transport Scotland to undertake a follow up (monitoring) study of the three A90 junctions serving Laurencekirk, approximately three years after the installation of road safety measures. 1.1 The study compares injury collision statistics for this area including damage only collisions pre and post construction, highlighting any changes. 1.2 The study also includes consultation with Aberdeenshire Council and Police Scotland (including Safety Camera Partnership) as key stakeholders, seeking their views on the performance of the A90 junctions since the installation of the measures. 2. SITE DESCRIPTION 2.1. The A90 Trunk Road is the main strategic link between Dundee and Aberdeen. The settlement of Laurencekirk is situated approximately 40km south of Aberdeen. The A90 bypasses Laurencekirk to the east and is dual carriageway standard at this point. Laurencekirk is served by three A90 junctions, the A90/A937 south junction, the A90/B9120 junction and the A90/A937 north junction. The location of these junctions is shown in Figure 2.1. Figure 2.1 - Location of A90 junctions in the vicinity of Laurencekirk

Page: 5 2.2 Both the A90/A937 south and A90/B9120 are right/left staggered junctions. The A90/A937 north junction takes the form of a crossroads with the private access to Keilburn situated on the eastern side. 3. STUDY PURPOSE AND METHODOLOGY 3.1. The purpose of this study is to identify any changes in collision patterns at the three A90 Laurencekirk junctions following the installation of the road safety measures in May 2010. These measures were: - Installation of vehicle activated signing on the A90 approaches by local road and crossing traffic at the A90/B9120(northbound and southbound approach) and A90/A937(northbound approach only) junctions - Installation of Cross With Care signs opposite both legs at the A90/B9120 junction - Surface treatment measures on both A90 carriageways at the B9120 and A937 north junctions - Relocation of the existing northbound advance direction sign for the A90/B9120 junction - Upgrading of the existing pedestrian warning signs and installation of a new safety camera sign at the A90/B9120 junction - Refreshing road markings and studs with high visibility alternatives at all junctions 3.2. In order to determine the changes in collision patterns, the following activities have been carried out: Review of currently available injury collision records; Review of currently available non-injury collision records; and Consultation with Police Scotland, North East Safety Camera Partnership (NESCAMP) and Aberdeenshire Council

Page: 6 Collision Information 3.3. The measures mentioned above were recommended for installation in the A90 Laurencekirk Road Safety Review report (2009). These were projected to result in a reduction in injury collisions at the rate of 1.32 per year and generate a First Year Rate of Return (FYRR) of approximately 480%. 3.4. Analysis of injury collision data has been carried out to determine the actual safety improvement performance of the measures and to enable a direct comparison with the above statistics. Collision information for this report was gathered from Transport Scotland s SERIS database. The pre-installation period covers 1 st March 2007 to the 28 th February 2010 while the post-installation period covers 1 st June 2010 to 31 st May 2013. Collision statistics for these timescales are included in Appendix A. 3.5. Non-injury collision records for this location have also been considered in the study. It should be noted that whilst non-injury collision details sometimes prove useful in identifying a collision pattern, the information may be less detailed than an injury collision and cannot always be corroborated by a police officer.

Page: 7 4. COLLISION ANALYSIS Section Analysis 4.1. Over the three year period directly prior to the installation of the safety measures there were 16 injury collisions recorded on the section of A90 passing Laurencekirk. This included seven crashes that resulted in a fatal or serious injury (KSI).Table 4.1 provides a breakdown of these in terms of year and severity. Year 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total Before Fatal 0 0 1 0 1 Serious 2 1 2 1 6 Slight 2 4 2 1 9 Damage Only 6 6 1 8 21 Total Injury 4 5 5 2 16 Table 4.1 A90 Laurencekirk collisions before installation of safety measures 4.2. Since the completion of the works, in May 2010 six injury collisions have been recorded (including one KSI) on the section of A90 passing Laurencekirk, including the three junctions. Table 4.2 provides a breakdown of these in terms of year and severity and Table 4.3 provides direct before/after comparison for each collision severity type. Year 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total After Fatal 0 0 0 0 0 Serious 0 1 0 0 1 Slight 3 0 1 1 5 Damage Only 8 8 8 5 29 Total Injury 3 1 1 1 6 Table 4.2 A90 Laurencekirk collisions after installation of safety measures

Page: 8 Change KSI Before After Difference % % Fatal 1 0-1 100 Serious 6 1-5 83-6 86 Slight 9 5-4 44 Total Injury 16 6-10 63 Damage Only 21 29 +8 28 Table 4.3 A90 Laurencekirk Before/After Comparison 4.3. A comparison of the above before and after figures indicates a reduction in injury collisions of approximately 63%, including a reduction in KSI collisions of 86%. This is significantly higher than the average reduction rates for both Scottish and NE Unit trunk road dual carriageways over the same time period, which are approximately 14% (17% KSI) and 14% (19% KSI) respectively. 4.4. In addition to the above, it should be noted that this collision reduction was recorded during a period when annual average daily traffic flows within this general area increased by approximately 16% (18,227 to 21,170). 4.5. In terms of annual collision savings, the performance of the measures averages out to a saving of 3.33 collisions per year, which is significantly higher than the projected 1.32. 4.6. The actual FYRR, based upon actual construction and collision costs is 190%. This is lower than the projected 480%, which is due to a higher than estimated construction costs and lowering of the average collision cost in recent years. However, despite the lower than projected result, the measures still provide a substantial rate of return, which is well above the normal threshold of acceptability (100%). Details of FYRR calculation is contained in Appendix B. 4.7. It should be noted that the installation of a northbound merge taper at the A90/A937 north junction in 2012 may have also contributed towards the reduction in collisions.

Page: 9 4.8. The A90 Laurencekirk Road Safety Review (2009) identified the prominence of collisions involving right-turn movements in this area. Analysis of the collision data has identified seven involving right-turns during the pre-construction period. This reduced to three after the measures were installed; a reduction of 58%. 4.9. The location and severity of the collisions analysed are contained in Appendix A. A90/A937 South Junction 4.10. There have been two recorded injury collisions at this junction since the completion of the works in comparison to three prior to the measures. Table 4.3 below provides details of the before and after collision data.. 1 st March 2007 to 28 th February 2010 Year Fatal Serious Slight Total 2007 0 0 0 0 2008 0 0 2 2 2009 0 0 1 1 2010 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 3 3. 1 st June 2010 to 31 st May 2013 Year Fatal Serious Slight Total 2010 0 0 1 1 2011 0 0 0 0 2012 0 0 0 0 2013 0 0 1 1 Total 0 0 2 2 A reduction of 33% Table 4.3 A90/A937 South Junction Injury Collisions before / after comparison 4.11. In term of crashes involving right-turn movements, there were two recorded pre-construction with one occurring since the measures were installed. 4.12. There have been eight damage only collisions recorded at this junction since the completion of the works in comparison to seven beforehand.

Page: 10 A90/B9120 Junction 4.13. There have been two recorded injury collisions at this junction since the completion of the works in comparison to five prior to the measures. Table 4.4 below provides details of the before and after collision data. 1 st March 2007 to 28 th February 2010 Year Fatal Serious Slight Total 2007 0 1 0 1 2008 0 0 2 2 2009 0 1 1 2 2010 Total 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 5 1 st June 2010 to 31 st May 2013 Year Fatal Serious Slight Total 2010 0 0 0 0 2011 0 1 0 1 2012 0 0 1 1 2013 0 0 0 0 Total 0 1 1 2 A reduction of 60% Table 4.4 A90/B9120 Junction Injury Collisions before / after comparison 4.14. In term of crashes involving right-turn movements, there were three recorded pre-construction with one occurring since the measures were installed. 4.15. There have been four damage only collisions recorded at this junction since the completion of the works in comparison to three beforehand.

Page: 11 A90/A937 North Junction 4.16. There have been two recorded injury collisions at this junction since the completion of the works in comparison to eight prior to the measures. 4.17. It should be noted that the introduction of a northbound merge lane at this junction in 2012 may have contributed towards this reduction also. 4.18. Table 4.5 below provides details of the before and after collision data. 1 st March 2007 to 28 th February 2010 Year Fatal Serious Slight Total 2007 0 1 2 3 2008 0 1 0 1 2009 1 1 0 2 2010 0 1 1 2 Total 1 4 3 8 1 st June 2010 to 31 st May 2013 Year Fatal Serious Slight Total 2010 0 0 2 2 2011 0 0 0 0 2012 0 0 0 0 2013 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 2 2 A reduction of 75% Table 4.5 A90/A937 North Junction Injury Collisions - before / after comparison 4.19. In term of crashes involving right-turn movements, there were two recorded pre-construction with one occurring since the measures were installed. 4.20. There has been four damage only collision recorded at this junction since the completion of the works, in comparison to four beforehand..

Page: 12 5. CONSULTATION 5.1. Police Scotland, North East Safety Camera Partnership (NESCAMP) and Aberdeenshire Council as key stakeholders were consulted as part of the study and their responses are summarised below: 5.2. Police Scotland has advised that they have no concerns over any of the junctions since the measures were installed. 5.3. NESCAMP has advised that they have seen a continual rise in camera activations since 2010 (2010 3454 / 2011 5198 / 2012 5724) with 6,000 camera activations in 2013 (not all of which resulted in prosecution). This highlights that there is still a speeding issue despite 14 various signs travelling north and 12 signs travelling south warning of the change in speed limit. However NESCAMP believes that the introduction of the lower limit (combined with other safety measures) has helped to reduce the number of collisions at the A90 / A937 (South) Junction. 5.4. Aberdeenshire Council are not aware of any major issues but has advised that local residents still raise the issue about the requirement for grade separated junctions. 6. CONCLUSIONS 6.1. It is clear from the recorded collision statistics that the installed measures have improved safety in this area substantially with all junctions recording reductions in injury collision numbers since the works were completed. In addition the primary accident type, involving right-turn movements, has reduced in frequency to a similar degree and at all junctions. 6.2. In term of a comparison of projected against actual road safety performance, the measures have been more effective in reducing collision numbers than initially estimated. And whilst the FYRR for the measures are lower than originally estimated, they still record a significant and acceptable return. 6.3. Despite the reduction in collision numbers there is still concern over the continuing high rate of speeding offences in the vicinity of the A90/A937 south junction.

Page: 13 7. RECOMMENDATIONS 7.1. Given the positive impact of the installed measures, no further direct road safety improvements are recommended at this stage. However further consideration should be given to an overall review of speed limit / safety camera signing in the area in conjunction with the North East Safety Camera Partnership.

Page: 14 APPENDIX A COLLISION PLAN

KEY Post construction accidents 1003455-SL Pre construction accidents 0703321-SL Fatal Serious Slight 1000837-SL 0703321-SL 1003455-SL 0900834-SL 0702140-S 0702683-SL 1000774-S 0800677-S 0903742-F 1002847-SL 0703688-S 11004432-S 0900269-S 0805211-SL 0901113-SL 0805022-SL 0900569-SL 1203831-SL 1300628-SL 0801350-SL 0803282-SL 1005160-SL

Page: 15 APPENDIX B FIRST YEAR RATE OF RETURN CALCULATION

Page: 16 FIRST YEAR RATE OF RETURN First Year Rate of Return = Ave. accident cost x No. accidents saved x 100% Scheme cost Measures Vehicle activated signing on the A90 approaches by local road and crossing traffic at the A90/B9120 (northbound and southbound approach) and A90/A937 (northbound approach only) junctions Cross With Care signs opposite both legs at the A90/B9120 junction Surface treatment measures on both A90 carriageways at the B9120 and A937 north junctions Relocation of the existing northbound advance direction sign for the A90/B9120 junction approximately 100 metres southwards Upgrading the existing pedestrian warning signs sign and install a new safety camera sign at the A90/B9120 junction Refresh road markings and replace studs with high visibility alternatives at all junctions Cut back shrubbery adjacent to the northbound advance direction sign for the A90/A937 north junction Total Construction Cost = 201,215.49 Annual Accident Reduction = 10 / 3 = 3.33 per year Estimated Annual Accident Saving = 3.33 x 116,191 (Source: Road Casualties Scotland 2012 Table 10) = 386,916.03 First Year Rate of return = 386,916.03 x 100/201,215.49 = 192%