The extent of IUU fishing in the Barents Sea

Similar documents
Combatting IUU fishing in the Arctic

Fishing mortality in relation to highest yield. Fishing mortality in relation to agreed target

3.4 Stock Summaries Advice June 2011

3.3.2 Cod (Gadus morhua) in subareas 1 and 2 (Northeast Arctic)

3.3.2 Advice June 2014

Cod (Gadus morhua) in subareas 1 and 2 (Northeast Arctic)

4.9.5 Norwegian spring-spawning herring

DIRECTORATE OF FISHERIES, NORWAY. Report. March Status report for 2005 Russian cod and haddock fishing / transshipment at sea COASTGUARD NORTH

9.4.5 Advice September Widely distributed and migratory stocks Herring in the Northeast Atlantic (Norwegian spring-spawning herring)

3.4.3 Advice June Barents Sea and Norwegian Sea Cod in Subareas I and II (Norwegian coastal waters cod)

Stock characteristics, fisheries and management of Greenland halibut (Reinhardtius hippoglossoides (Walbaum)) in the Northeast Arctic

Blue whiting (Micromesistius poutassou) in subareas 1 9, 12, and 14 (Northeast Atlantic and adjacent waters)

Beaked redfish (Sebastes mentella) in subareas 1 and 2 (Northeast Arctic)

Northeast Atlantic Mackerel, Handlines

Beaked redfish (Sebastes mentella) in subareas 1 and 2 (Northeast Arctic)

FISHERY BY-PRODUCT REPORT

Inter-RAC Conference Decision-making within a reformed Common Fisheries Policy (CFP)

9.4.5 Advice October Widely Distributed and Migratory Stocks Herring in the Northeast Atlantic (Norwegian spring-spawning herring)

Blue whiting (Micromesistius poutassou) in subareas 1 9, 12, and 14 (Northeast Atlantic and adjacent waters)

Arctic Fisheries and International Law

Evaluation of NEA haddock Harvest Control Rules

ICES advice on fishing opportunities

FISHERIES CO-OPERATION ICELAND AND NORWAY WITH. Presented by Philip Rodgers ERINSHORE ECONOMICS

Advice June 2012

REDFISH in Sub-areas I and II. Nominal catch (t) by countries in Sub-area I, Divisions IIa and IIb combined as officially reported to ICES.

Atlantic cod, Norwegian Coastal cod, Gillnet

EcoQO on spawning stock biomass of commercial fish species 1

FISHERY ASSESSMENT REPORT

Indicator Fact Sheet (FISH11) Catches by major species and areas

Mr Joao AGUIAR MACHADO Director General Directorate General Maritime Affairs and Fisheries Rue de la Loi Brussels BELGIUM

Recent stock recovery and potential future developments in. Sebastes mentella in the Barents- and Norwegian Seas.

U.N. Gen. Ass. Doc. A/CONF.164/37 (8 September 1995) < pdf?openelement>.

Fast Tracking the Development of Environmental- Friendly Fishing Methods

The Plan covers an initial recovery phase as well as a long-term management phase and shall consist of the following elements.

ICES advises that when the MSY approach is applied, catches in 2019 should be no more than tonnes.

2.3.1 Advice May Capelin in Subareas V and XIV and Division IIa west of 5 W (Iceland East Greenland Jan Mayen area).

Atlantic cod in the North-East Arctic (ICES subarea 1 and 2), Longlines. Overview. Stock Status less risk more risk. Management less risk more risk

A reformed CFP needs to be based on sustainability, and use the principle of caution

Progress Made by Tuna Regional Fisheries Management Organizations (RFMOs)

AGREED RECORD OF FISHERIES CONSULTATIONS BETWEEN NORWAY AND THE EUROPEAN UNION FOR 2011 BERGEN, 4 DECEMBER 2010

The costs of IUU fishing to the EU

QUOTAS -Setting and Sharing

Spurdog (Squalus acanthias) in the Northeast Atlantic

Mackerel (Scomber scombrus) in subareas 1 8 and 14, and in Division 9.a (the Northeast Atlantic and adjacent waters)

Sustainable Fisheries for Future Generations The Fisheries White Paper

FISHERY ASSESSMENT REPORT TEMPLATE

Council CNL(14)29. Annual Progress Report on Actions Taken Under Implementation Plans for the Calendar Year Russian Federation

Whiting (Merlangius merlangus) in Subarea 4 and Division 7.d (North Sea and eastern English Channel)

Report of the ICES Advisory Committee 2012

FISHERY ASSESSMENT REPORT

Whole Fish Fishery Assessment Examples and Conditions Document

ICES Advice on fishing opportunities, catch, and effort Celtic Seas and Greater North Sea ecoregions Published 30 June 2016

Collaboration between the Institute of Marine Research, the fishing fleet and the fishing industry

Effective Collaboration Between Scientists, Managers and Policy Makers

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION. Fishing Opportunities for 2009 Policy Statement from the European Commission

Herring in the North Sea, Exploitation and Conservation. Presentation by Dr Beatriz A. Roel

6.4 Stock summaries Advice June 2012

A8-0377/

Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) in divisions 7.b k (southern Celtic Seas and English Channel)

LEGALISED OVERFISHING

6.3.8 Advice May 2014 Version 2, ECOREGION North Sea STOCK Herring in Division IIIa and Subdivisions (western Baltic spring spawners)

Fish Stock Status - Overview. 16 th November 2017 Seafish Common Language Group Friend s House, Euston Road, London NW1 2BJ

6.3.4 Cod (Gadus morhua) in Subarea IV and Divisions VIId and IIIa West (North Sea, Eastern English Channel, Skagerrak)

Combating IUU: China and the European Market

FISHERIES ASSESSMENT REPORT

Haddock, Iceland, ICES Va, Danish Seine

SUMMARY OF ICES 2009 ADVICE FOR PELAGIC SPECIES incl Blue whiting, capelin, herring, Norway pout, sandeel and sprat

Report No. 27 to the Storting

ICES ASSESSED STOCKS - SUMMARY OF ADVICE PUBLISHED IN 2014

This is to certify that the: FIUN Barents & Norwegian Seas Cod Fishery

The Protection of Vulnerable Marine Ecosystems in the Northwest Atlantic: NAFO Processes and Regulations

Sustainable Fisheries and the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. Introduction

ICES WGCSE REPORT

Environmental signals Fisheries. policy issue indicator assessment. fishing fleet. for cod stock in the North Sea

Map Showing NAFO Management Units

How illegal discarding. failing EU fisheries. and citizens. How illegal discarding in. fisheries and citizens. Executive summary

The Discard Ban Package Norwegian experiences in efforts to improve fisheries exploitation patterns

Arctic Frontiers, Tromsø, January 24 th Thorbjørn Thorvik, Senior adviser. The Norwegian Directorate of Fisheries.

L 198/8 Official Journal of the European Union

Advice October 2012

Herring (Clupea harengus) in Subarea 4 and divisions 3.a and 7.d, autumn spawners (North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat, eastern English Channel)

NASCO Guidelines for the Management of Salmon Fisheries

now! successful recovery plans Essential guide to for Europe s fish stocks Europe s fish stocks need sustainable recovery plans

Comparison of EU and US Fishery management Systems Ernesto Penas Principal Adviser DG Mare

Advice June 2012

Advice June Capelin in Subareas V and XIV and Division IIa west of 5 W (Iceland East Greenland Jan Mayen area).

ICES advice on fishing opportunities. ICES advises that when the MSY approach is applied, total removals in 2018 should be no more than 880 tonnes.

Whiting (Merlangius merlangus) in Division 6.a (West of Scotland)

85% 57% Towards the recovery of European Fisheries. Healthy stocks produce more fish. of European fish stocks are below healthy levels

First Ever Estimate of Cod Fishery in 1850s Reveals 96% Decline on Scotian Shelf

REC.CM-GFCM/40/2016/4

Why has the cod stock recovered in the North Sea?

LEGAL BASIS OBJECTIVES ACHIEVEMENTS

Evaluation of fisheries dependent information in European waters 5-9 September 2016, Gavirate

Advice June Sole in Division IIIa and Subdivisions (Skagerrak, Kattegat, and the Belts)

DRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2017/2120(INI)

ICES Advisory Approach

IOTC Agreement Article X. Report of Implementation for the year 2016

AGREEMENT ON PORT STATE MEASURES TO PREVENT, DETER AND ELIMINATE ILLEGAL, UNREPORTED AND UNREGULATED FISHING

7 th Dec: TRENDS & FORWARD PROSPECTS FOR SCOTTISH COD, HADDOCK, WHITING, SAITHE Fishing & Uptake

Transcription:

The extent of IUU fishing in the Barents Sea Maren Esmark, WWF- Norway Anna Filippova, WWF- Russia Chatham House, London 10. november 2006

The Barents Sea a unique and rich marine ecosystem Atlantic cod gone in 15 years? The Barents Sea Cod stock and management Estimating illegal fishing in the Barents Sea -ICES - Norwegian authorities - WWF-Russia WWF working globally to reduce IUU

Barents Sea unique and rich One of the most biologically diverse and productive regions of the North. The number of benthic species is far higher than in any other part of the Arctic (the World's northernmost deepwater coral reefs off the Norwegian coast, at 71 o N). Fish: Around 150 species of 52 families. The World's largest stocks of some economically important species (cod, herring, capelin and blue whiting a.o.) Seabirds: Nearly 25 million individuals in summer. Some of the largest seabird colonies in the World. 68 species depending on the marine environment for all or parts of the year. Whales: Twelve large cetaceans + five dolphin species. Some species unable to recover from past whaling (ecosystem properties permanently altered) Seals: Seven species

WWF Barents Sea Ecoregion Programme European Arctic (Norway and Russia): Barents Sea, parts of Norwegian Sea and Kara Sea Ecoregion project initiated autumn 1999 Project office in Oslo and Murmansk (5 full time staff) Involves the WWF Arctic Programme, WWF Norway and WWF Russia

Atlantic cod gone in 15 years? Total global catch of Atlantic cod was in 1970 around 3.1 million tons. In 2002, total catch was down to 890.000 tons, a reduction of more than 70 %. (FAO Fishstats 2004)

Recommendations related to European cod stocks (ICES 2003): North Sea: Total stop in fishing is recommended Barents Sea cod: Reduced fishing is recommended Norwegian coastal cod: Total stop in fishing is recommended Baltic Sea: Reduced fishing is recommended Icelandic cod: Reduced fishing is recommended Faroe Plateau cod: Reduced fishing is recommended Faroe Bank cod: Reduced fishing is recommended Greenland cod: Reduced fishing is recommended West of Scotland: Total stop in fishing is recommended Irish Sea: Total stop in fishing is recommended

Drying cod in Lofoten This thousand year old tradition is now at threat. The Barents Sea Cod

Reference: ICES, ACFM June 2006 Northeast Arctic Cod Stock

The Barents Sea Fishery

Management of Northeast Arctic cod Joint Russian-Norwegian Fisheries Commission provides mutual access to fisheries in the waters of the two countries since 1976. The Commission has developed a very comprehensive, as compared to other commercial species, complex of measures regulating the cod fishery, which includes setting an annual total allowable catch (TAC), then distributed into national quotas, juvenile fish protection including regulations concerning commercial size, allowable catches of undersized fish, fishing gear restrictions etc. and protection of fish on spawning grounds. In addition measures to controll IUU such as ban on transshipments to FOC vessels have been adopted.

The management strategy At the 33rd meeting of the Joint Russian-Norwegian Fisheries Commission (JRNC) in November 2004, the following decision was made: The Parties agreed that the management strategies for cod and haddock should take into account the following: conditions for high long-term yield from the stocks achievement of year-to-year stability in TACs full utilization of all available information on stock development On this basis, the Parties determined the following decision rules for setting the annual fishing quota (TAC) for Northeast Arctic cod (NEA cod): estimate the average TAC level for the coming 3 years based on Fpa. TAC for the next year will be set tothis level as a starting value for the 3-year period. the year after, the TAC calculation for the next 3 years is repeated based on the updated information about the stock development, however the TAC should not be changed by more than +/- 10% compared with the previous year s TAC. if the spawning stock falls below Bpa, the procedure for establishing TAC should be based on a fishing mortality that is linearly reduced from Fpa at Bpa, to F= 0 at SSB equal to zero. At SSB-levels below Bpa in any of the operational years (current year, a year before and 3 years of prediction) there should be no limitations on the year-to-year Reference: Protocol of the 33rd session of The Joint Norwegian-Russian Fishery Commission and translated from Norwegian to English. For an accurate interpretation,

ICES evaluation of the management strategy ICES has evaluated these decision rules for cod and a management plan based upon them is in accordance with the precautionary approach when the SSB is above Blim. The agreed management plan was not evaluated with an implementation error as large as the one currently occurring in the fishery.

Northeast Arctic Cod Stock Reference: ICES, ACFM June 2006

Directorate of Fisheries and the Coast Guard Estimating the total catch of Russian cod and haddock in 2005. Since 2002, analyses have been carried out on an annual basis of estimated Russian cod fishing. Haddock included in 2005 Estimates are based on: Sailing analyses Documentation collected from inspections Landing data collected in Norway, Holland and Germany.

Russian vessels sailing routes (14 days period)

Analysis Landing figures in Norway gathered through SLULES2. Documentation of transshipment and supply to foreign countries via control of Russian fishing and transport vessels both in harbour and at sea. Coast Guard air and sea observations in the Barents- and North seas. Sailing information which illustrates activities of Russian fishing and transport vessels. Activity is defined as the transport of cod to the EU, Russia (Murmansk and Archangel) and other areas. AIS data on activities of non-russian transport vessels. Information on vessels docking at harbours in Europe. Overview of vessels with quotas and licences in the NEAFC3 area.

The Barents Sea Fishery

Ports where Barents Sea cod is landed: Grimsby, England Eemshaven, Netherlands Velsen, Netherlands Bremerhaven, Germany (Temporary stop) Danish harbours Porto del Marin, Spania Porto Aveiro, Portugal

Conclusion Based on estimated quantity compared with documented quantity, we estimate Russian cod fishing in 2005 to be 315,000 tons cod and 87,600 tons haddock round weight. This constitutes an estimated excess of roughly 101,000 tons cod and 36,300 tons haddock in 2005. Based on the same methods used for the last three years, the analysis indicates that transshipment and transport activities are the same as the previous year. The quantity could be higher, as this analysis has not taken sufficient account for transporting filleted fish.

Estimating possible illegal catch by vessel type WWF-numbers 2005

Esimating unreported catch In 2004, PINRO, the Russian Institute of Marine Research in Murmansk carried out an investigation concerning the reliability of fisheries statistics. This research is further used in the WWF report to develop the foundations and methodological approaches to the estimation of possible cod catches left out of account by the official fisheries statistics. Three methods of revealing unreliable and doubtful statistical data were applied:

1st method: The first method used Cath per Unit Effort, compared with the daily catch from vessels operating under a legal quota and catch permit. This is a good indicator to find the difference between the catch a vessel would need to operate within economic sound frames and the official catch/landing statistics. The numbers clearly show a difference indicating a significant illegal fishing.

2nd method: The second method used statistics from earlier years where it is assumed that the illegal fishing was on a minimum and compared this with numbers from recent years where it is assumed that the level of illegal fishing is high. When Catch per unit effort is used as an indicator, also this method shows that several vessels probably are fishing illegally, as they would not be economic viable if they were operating legally.

3rd method: The third method to check up the reliability of catch statistics is the comparison of CPUE of fishing vessels with that of research-fishing vessels of the same type with PINRO observers onboard conducting state monitoring of stocks in September-December 2004. CPUE of the vessels with observers onboard was found out to be almost the double of CPUE for other vessels of the same type and almost three times higher than that of the vessels with doubtful catch statistics.

Conclusion The analysis has used statistics and information that is publicly available. WWF-Russia has facilitated the analysis that for the first time uses Russian data to calculate an estimate of the quantity of the illegal cod fishery. The conclusion is that the earlier estimates from the Norwegian Directorate of Fisheries that the annual illegal fishery is between 70.000 and 115.000 tons, are correct. Calculated to marked value this is around 120 million Euros

WWF working globally on IUU

Several approaches Estimating illegal fishing, e.g una, pollock and cod NEAFC new proposal this year for port state control CCAMLR improving present regime UN-FAO port state measures agreement/convention Joint Russian Norwegian fisheries commission EU Sanctions by flag state and port state, enforcment Russia inspection and control, enforcement High Seas Task Force, OECD initative etc Market transparency and traceabillity, AIPCE working group on IUU