Reconstruction of Leland Avenue. Stanford Avenue. Palo Alto Way

Similar documents
Board of Supervisors February 27, 2017

Building Great Neighbourhoods BELLEVUE AND VIRGINIA PARK

Atwood Avenue Fair Oaks Avenue Cottage Grove Road

Fleur Drive Reconstruction

LARIMER COUNTY: ENGINEERING DOUGLAS ROAD (CR 54)

COMMUNITY MEETING AGENDA

Fifth & Kirkham Traffic-Calming Project. 5 th Avenue and Kirkham Street Presented at the UCSF Quarterly Parnassus Community Meeting May 3, 2018

ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS. Transportation Improvements: Santa s Village Road (MR15) Public Meeting

SECTION 3 STREET DESIGN

Building Great Neighbourhoods STRATHEARN

122 Avenue: 107 Street to Fort Road

Complete Streets Policy DAVID CRONIN, P.E., CITY ENGINEER

Building Great Neighbourhoods LANSDOWNE

Inspector MUST Sign and Date Each Inspection

Draft Traffic Calming Policy Paper

Item No. 14 Town of Atherton

Derby Street. Project Updates. Salem, Massachusetts

SUBJECT Memorandum of Understanding to Complete a Caltrain Grade Separation Study for the Whipple Avenue Crossing

West Dimond Blvd Upgrade Jodhpur Street to Sand Lake Road

CTH M HIGHWAY PROJECT CTH Q to STH 113

Houma-Thibodaux Metropolitan Planning Organization STP<200K Funding Application APPLICATION

I-20 ODESSA-MIDLAND CORRIDOR STUDY. Public Meeting for Schematic Design

This Chapter sets forth the minimum design, technical criteria and specifications to be used in the preparation of all roadway plans.

U.S. HIGHWAY 50 IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

Building Great Neighbourhoods BONNIE DOON

MASONIC AVENUE STREET DESIGN STUDY Community Workshop 2. Masonic Ave Street Design Study Community Workshop 2 August 10, 2010

Building Great Neighbourhoods QUEEN ALEXANDRA

BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

Route 29 Corridor Assessment Update. Development of Possible Solutions

CSAH 101 Preliminary Design

4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 9. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC

Lake Waterford Community Association Meeting. November 15, 2016

Houma-Thibodaux Metropolitan Planning Organization STP<200K Funding Application APPLICATION

IH 20 RANGER HILL PUBLIC MEETING

REGULAR MEETING of the San Mateo County Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (SMCBPAC) Thursday, October 20, 2016

ADA TRANSITION PLAN 2013

Governance and Priorities Committee Report For the July 2, 2015 Meeting

City of Margate, Florida. Neighborhood Traffic Management Manual

INTRODUCTION. The focus of this study is to reduce congestion and improve mobility for all modes of transportation. Figure ES-1 Study Corridor Map

MASONIC AVENUE STREET DESIGN STUDY Community Workshop 3. Masonic Ave Street Design Study Community Workshop 3 September 30, 2010

T A B L E OF C O N T E N T S

Santa Clara I-280 CORRIDOR STUDY

Public Open House #2. THE CITY OF NORTH VANCOUVER CHESTERFIELD AVENUE CYCLING IMPROVEMENTS (4th - 13th STREET) JULY 2013

TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN Review Citywide Recommendations, Updated List and Scoring Methodology December 6, 2018

Diamond Springs Parkway Project

83 AVENUE PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING

20 minute presentation on proposed project. Comments and Questions following presentation. City of Madison

Kalamazoo County Weekly Project Updates from the Cities of Portage, Kalamazoo and the Kalamazoo County Road Commission

Caltrain Bicycle Parking Management Plan DRAFT PROJECT SCOPE SUBMITTED TO CALTRANS FALL 2014

Chapter 3 DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS

Montgomery County Life Sciences Center Loop Trail

ACHD Board of Commissioners Stacey Yarrington, Planner III Tandem Ridge/ EPP / PP-07-16/ RZ-12-16/ CPA-01-16/ A-07-16

NORTH DOWNTOWN N EAST WEST

ADA Training Standard Plans

DRAFT - CITY OF MEDFORD TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN Roadway Cross-Sections

Hennepin County Transportation Department

Progress Report on the Design and Planning of an Infrastructure Improvement Project for the Sunnyside TIF District (Phase II)

San Tomas Expressway

Transportation and General Civil Engineering Projects

City of Madison, East Johnson Street North Baldwin Street to First Street Local Street Dane County

INGHAM COUNTY ROAD DEPARTMENT AUSTIN E. CAVANAUGH ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 301 Bush Street, P.O. Box 38, Mason, MI

Mark Malone, P.E. SD DOT

Introduction to Roadway Design

4APNOIPF Vh, YII PTC CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT. Honorable Mayor and City Council Members. 8K TH 63 River Crossing Bridge Replacement Project

COMMUNITY MEETING August 23, 2018

City of Madison, East Johnson Street North Baldwin Street to First Street Local Street Dane County

Driveway Design Criteria

Street Paving and Sidewalk Policy

ITEM 3 ATTACHMENT A RESOLUTION NO

Frequently Asked Questions

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION

Overview. Illinois Bike Summit IDOT Complete Streets Policy Presentation. What is a Complete Street? And why build them? And why build them?

Geary Bus Rapid Transit Project

Omaha s Complete Streets Policy

PROJECT FACT SHEET May 25, 2018

Project Goal and Description. Why Broadway? Broadway SFMTA.COM/BROADWAY. The goal of the Broadway Safety Improvement

BICYCLE AND TRAILS ADVISORY COMMISSION Meeting Minutes

St. Francis Drive through the City of Santa Fe Corridor Study

Preparing a Curb Ramp Project. December 15, 2010

PUBLIC,UTILITIES COMMSSION OF THE

Project Update May 2018

INTRODUCTION THOROUGHFARE SYSTEM CLASSIFICATIONS

Sponsored by the Office of Traffic and Safety of the Iowa Department of Transportation NOVEMBER 2001 CTRE

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. Non-NHS State Highways

TRAFFIC CALMING GUIDE FOR TORONTO CITY OF TORONTO TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVISION

Colerain Avenue Roadway Improvements. Sponsored by Hamilton County Engineer

Land Use Bicycle Spaces Required Type Residential

APPENDIX I: ROADWAY CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM AND PROJECT CONSISTENCY STANDARDS

WELCOME Public Information Centre

GARLAND ROAD/GASTON AVENUE/ GRAND AVENUE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT STUDY

APPENDIX I-A Kings County Regional Transportation Plan. Appendix A Page A-1 STATE ROUTES

Poor pavement condition Substandard Intersections. / Substandard bike/pedestrian/transit accommodations. Driveway access Environmental concerns

Final Sidewalk Feasibility Study

Water Street Promenade. Engineering and Design Services. Public Information Meeting No. 2. Education / Infrastructure / Innovation. Maplewood Avenue &

SUBJECT: AUTHORIZE BID ADVERTISEMENT FOR OLIVE AVENUE CLASS 2 BIKE LANES HSIP, CIP PROJECT NO

Preliminary Engineering Study

Mission-Geneva Transportation Study Community Workshop 2 July 8, 2006

Swamp Road Residents Study

GWINNETT COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Transcription:

Reconstruction of Leland Avenue (from Palo Alto Way to Frontage Road near Sand Hill Road) Stanford Avenue (from Palo Alto Way to Frontage Road near Sand Hill Road) Palo Alto Way (from Santa Cruz Avenue to Leland Avenue) December 3, 2015 County of San Mateo Department of Public Works

Agenda West Menlo Park Area Road Improvements Project Description & Property Owner Survey Road Alignment Proposed Process and Timeline Questions, Comments, and Input

Road Improvement Standards and Priority List 1996 Began development of Road Standards and Improvement Priority List Property owner surveys on unimproved streets and public meeting 1997 - Board of Supervisors (Board) adopted Road Standards and Priority List 1999 & 2003 Board adopted modified Road Standards and procedures for determining Road Standards to be used

West Menlo Park Area Priority List

West Menlo Park Area Road Standard Note: Board Resolution No. 065764, dated 1/07/03 allowed for the installation of a single valley gutter in the center of the road or on one side of the road where topography or limited right-of-way precludes the construction of valley gutters on both sides of the road.

Project Location

Project Description Based on the Board s policy, the improvements are to be centered in the road right-of-way Leland Avenue and Stanford Avenue - Reconstruct road with 18 feet or 22 feet of pavement with 3-foot wide valley gutters Palo Alto Way - Reconstruct road to 18 feet with 3-foot wide valley gutter located at center of road Policy allows for a reduction in width to reduce conflicts with existing conditions

Survey (Leland & Stanford Avenues)

Survey (Palo Alto Way)

Leland Avenue (Option 2 and 3) OPTION 2 - RECONSTRUCT ROAD WITH 18-FOOT WIDE PAVEMENT WITH 3-FOOT WIDE VALLEY GUTTERS OPTION 3 - RECONSTRUCT ROAD WITH 22-FOOT WIDE PAVEMENT WITH 3-FOOT WIDE VALLEY GUTTERS (Pictorial Not Illustrated To Scale)

Stanford Avenue (Option 2 and 3) OPTION 2 - RECONSTRUCT ROAD WITH 18-FOOT WIDE PAVEMENT WITH 3-FOOT WIDE VALLEY GUTTERS OPTION 3 - RECONSTRUCT ROAD WITH 22-FOOT WIDE PAVEMENT WITH 3-FOOT WIDE VALLEY GUTTERS (Pictorial Not Illustrated To Scale)

Palo Alto Way (Option 2 and 3) OPTION 2 - RECONSTRUCT ROAD TO 18-FOOT WIDE ROAD WITH 2-FOOT WIDE VALLEY GUTTER OPTION 3 - RECONSTRUCT ROAD TO 18-FOOT WIDE ROAD WITH 3-FOOT WIDE VALLEY GUTTER Pictorial Not Illustrated To Scale)

Existing Conditions Leland Avenue (from Perry Avenue to Palo Alto Way)

Existing Conditions Stanford Avenue (from Sand Hill Road to Palo Alto Way)

Existing Conditions Palo Alto Way (from Stanford Avenue to Leland Avenue)

How do the markings match up with the existing conditions?

Leland Avenue (from Perry Avenue to Sand Hill Road)

Leland Avenue (from Perry Avenue to Sand Hill Road)

Leland Avenue (from Perry Avenue to Palo Alto Way)

Stanford Avenue (from Palo Alto Way to Sand Hill Road)

Stanford Avenue (from Palo Alto Way to Sand Hill Road)

Palo Alto Way (from Stanford Avenue to Santa Cruz Avenue)

Palo Alto Way (from Stanford Avenue to Santa Cruz Avenue)

Palo Alto Way (from Leland Avenue to Stanford Avenue)

Design Issues Based on Paint Markings (Leland Avenue and Stanford Avenue - 22 pavement and 3 valley gutters - centered in road right of way) Some driveways might become steeper than the existing driveways (20% maximum slope per County standard) Existing drainage features not aligned with proposed valley gutters Impacts to existing landscaping/shoulder area/fences/trees

Design Issues Based on Paint Markings (Palo Alto Way - 18 wide road and 3 valley gutter located at center of road - centered in road right of way) Some driveways might become steeper than the existing driveways (20% maximum slope per County standard) Impacts to existing landscaping/shoulder area/tree The distance from edge of pavement to property line will be 1-foot if 18 wide road is constructed.

Proposed Process & Timeline December 2015: Meet with property owners and conduct property owner survey January 2016: Determine if there is a project and standard(s) to be used Spring 2016: Develop project scope and design project Late Spring 2016: Advertise and bid out project Summer 2016: Project construction

Project Funding Construction of the roadway and valley gutters and minor work to match up to the valley gutters (driveways and shoulder area). Work outside of project scope: Landscaping, shoulder and driveway work beyond the required project limit If Property Owners have been contemplating sewer lateral work, completing it prior to roadway work would be advised. Property owners are responsible for maintenance and repair of the lateral from house to the sewer main.

Questions, Comments, and Input Contact: Anthony Seto Wency Ng aseto@smcgov.org wng@smcgov.org 650-363-4100 650-363-4100