Position on crab industry and fishing in the Svalbard zone.

Similar documents
Arctic Fisheries and International Law

REGULATION OF FUTURE FISHERIES IN THE ARCTIC OCEAN. Dr. Lilly Weidemann

QUOTAS -Setting and Sharing

The Protection of Vulnerable Marine Ecosystems in the Northwest Atlantic: NAFO Processes and Regulations

SC WG ON THE ECOSYSTEM APPROACH TO FISHERIES MANAGEMENT MAY 2008

The extent of IUU fishing in the Barents Sea

Norwegian fisheries and aquaculture management

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE NINTH REGULAR SESSION August 2013 Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia

L 198/8 Official Journal of the European Union

Stock characteristics, fisheries and management of Greenland halibut (Reinhardtius hippoglossoides (Walbaum)) in the Northeast Arctic

FAO Congress Director Spain; Hildegunn Fure Osmundsvåg 06/10/2017

Inter-RAC Conference Decision-making within a reformed Common Fisheries Policy (CFP)

The EU experience in implementation

Combatting IUU fishing in the Arctic

FISHERIES CO-OPERATION ICELAND AND NORWAY WITH. Presented by Philip Rodgers ERINSHORE ECONOMICS

While oil and gas is the nations largest export product in value, fish is the second largest. Both activities are crucial for the Norwegian economy.

REDFISH in Sub-areas I and II. Nominal catch (t) by countries in Sub-area I, Divisions IIa and IIb combined as officially reported to ICES.

Protecting the Deep Sea Under International Law. Legal Options for Addressing High Seas Bottom Trawling

Report No. 27 to the Storting

FISHERY BY-PRODUCT REPORT

Introduction. Biological Profile

2018 COM Doc. No. COC-303_Appendix 1 / oct.-18 (11:37 )

This is to certify that the: FIUN Barents & Norwegian Seas Cod Fishery

Fast Tracking the Development of Environmental- Friendly Fishing Methods

COUNTRY NOTE ON NATIONAL FISHERIES MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS -- SPAIN

Sustainable Fisheries and the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. Introduction

AY 2015 Year in Review

2017 NEAFC Annual Meeting (November 13th 17th)

The Common Fisheries Policy (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) (No. 2) Regulations 2019

Fishing mortality in relation to highest yield. Fishing mortality in relation to agreed target

Counting the fish catch - why don t the numbers match?

REGULATIONS RELATING TO MESH SIZES, BYCATCHES AND MINIMUM SIZES, ETC., DURING FISHING OPERATIONS IN THE FISHERIES PROTECTION ZONE AROUND SVALBARD

Regional Plan of Action (RPOA) to Promote Responsible Fishing Practices including Combating IUU Fishing in the Region 1. Contents

Special request, Advice June New information regarding the impact of fisheries on other components of the ecosystem

Sustainable Fisheries for Future Generations The Fisheries White Paper

HOW CAN WE HELP TO SUSTAIN AQUATIC BIODIVERSITY?

Serial No. N4503 NAFO SCR Doc. 01/115. SCIENTIFIC COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 2001 (Deep-sea Fisheries Symposium Poster)

Kuan-Hsiung WANG, Prof. Graduate Institute of Political Science Taiwan Normal University Taipei, TAIWAN

Map Showing NAFO Management Units

4.9.5 Norwegian spring-spawning herring

Beaked redfish (Sebastes mentella) in subareas 1 and 2 (Northeast Arctic)

SUMMARY OF PRIORITY RECOMMENDATIONS

The Fisheries and Aquaculture Sector in LITHUANIA

(Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS

Figure 1. Structure of Estonian commercial fishing and fish farming in 2010 (% of the total volume)

Conservation of Polar Bear: Implementation of the Agreement. THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

A reformed CFP needs to be based on sustainability, and use the principle of caution

A8-0377/

Arctic Fisheries: Present and future perspectives

Beaked redfish (Sebastes mentella) in subareas 1 and 2 (Northeast Arctic)

Evolution of Deepwater Coral Protection in the Southeast U.S

From right-based catch shares to benthic impacts

The economic implications of changing regulations for deep sea fishing: UK case study

Odd Aksel Bergstad Institute of Marine Research Norway

87% 49% North Western Waters Status and Potential Productivity of Fish Stocks. Summary. Only 10 stocks are in line with the Common Fisheries Policy.

Combating IUU: China and the European Market

6 th Meeting of the Scientific Committee Puerto Varas, Chile, 9-14 September SC6-Doc21 Chinese Taipei s Annual Report

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of

The costs of IUU fishing to the EU

Serial No. N6173 NAFO SCR Doc. 13/020 SCIENTIFIC COUNCIL MEETING JUNE 2013

FISHERY ASSESSMENT REPORT

17 th Coast Guard District 2005 Year In Review. CDR Michael Cerne Living Marine Resources Branch 8 February, 2005

Figure 1. Structure of Estonian commercial fishing and fish farming in 2011 (% of the total volume)

SCIENTIFIC COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER Status of Skate Stocks in the Barents Sea (Elasmobranch Fisheries Poster)

New information regarding the impact of fisheries on other components of the ecosystem

FISHERY ASSESSMENT REPORT TEMPLATE

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU)

Map Showing NAFO Management Units

(Tabled by the Russian Federation)

The Emerging Arctic. A New Maritime Frontier

Council CNL(14)29. Annual Progress Report on Actions Taken Under Implementation Plans for the Calendar Year Russian Federation

Frank Meere. Sustainable Fisheries Management

PRESIDENCY WORKING DOCUMENT

INTERIM MEASURES ADOPTED BY PARTICIPANTS IN NEGOTIATIONS TO ESTABLISH SOUTH PACIFIC REGIONAL FISHERIES MANAGEMENT ORGANISATION

Greenland case study. Nette Levermann Ministry of Fisheries, Hunting and Agriculture

/ Advice May 2011

1. TAC and quota allocation between Contracting Parties for the deep pelagic fishery

The Role of the NPAFC in Conservation and Protection of Pacific Salmon

SC European Union 2013 Annual Report. Ad Corten

NAFO s Experience in addressing the impact of bottom fisheries on

Notice to Fish Harvesters

Brexit and fisheries. fishing resources and markets at stake

Recommendations for the meeting of the North-East Atlantic Fisheries Commission 9-13 November 2009

Progress Made by Tuna Regional Fisheries Management Organizations (RFMOs)

COUNCIL REGULATION (EC)

LEGAL BASIS OBJECTIVES ACHIEVEMENTS

U.N. Gen. Ass. Doc. A/CONF.164/37 (8 September 1995) < pdf?openelement>.

THE NORWEGIAN MANAGEMENT OF THE RED KING CRAB. Guri Hjallen Eriksen The Norwegian Ministry of Fisheries and Coastal Affairs,

WESTERN MEDITERRANEAN

3.4 Stock Summaries Advice June 2011

Trawl Fishery Management Myanmar

The fishery for jack mackerel in the Eastern Central Pacific by European trawlers in 2008 and 2009

CMM Conservation and Management Measure for the Management of Bottom Fishing in the SPRFMO Convention Area

3.4.3 Advice June Barents Sea and Norwegian Sea Cod in Subareas I and II (Norwegian coastal waters cod)

SA2 + Div. 3K Redfish

Fishery Report 2016: Exploratory fishery for Dissostichus spp. in Division

Main resolutions and recommendations relating to straddling species adopted by regional fisheries management organizations and implemented by Mexico

Alaska Responsible Fisheries Management Certification Program. Announcement of Full Re-assessment of. Announcement of Full Assessment of

DIRECTORATE OF FISHERIES, NORWAY. Report. March Status report for 2005 Russian cod and haddock fishing / transshipment at sea COASTGUARD NORTH

Russian seafood embargo What s next?

Transcription:

Position on crab industry and fishing in the Svalbard zone. Joint Position of all EU companies involved into snow crab fishery in Barents Sea. Prepared by JCS Arctic Fishing

Snow crab, Chionoecetesopilio Snow crab (Chionoecetes opilio) is a new invasive crab species becoming an important and potentially dangerous player in the Barents Sea ecosystem. The snow crab (Chionoecetes opilio) is the second and most recent large non-native decapod (crustacean of the order Decapoda, such as a shrimp, crab, or lobster) that has become invasive to the Barents Sea, in addition to the red king crab. The snow crab is naturally distributedd in the north Pacific, the Sea of Japan, in northwest Atlantic, and in coastal areas of eastern Canada and Greenland and it is cryptic how it entered the Barents Sea. (ICES CM 2014/F:04)

The beginning Arctic Fishing and other EU vessels were the ones that discovered and started crab fishery in NEAFC RA following the confirmation by E that such fishing can be conducted with national permits and notification to NEAFC. EU vessels involved in this fishery were notified by EC to NEAFC for 2015-2016. The EU crab fleet in the area is the important player ranked same as Russian and Norwegia The vessels involved in snow crab fishery are (year of start fishing) Lithuania: Karalius (2014) Juros Vilkas (2014 Zalgiris (2014) Latvia: Solvita (2014) Solveiga (2014) Saldus (2014) Senator (2015) Kalmar (2014) Dubna (2015) Valka (2015) Memele (2015) Spain: Adexe Primero (2013) Figure 1. The map of NEAFC regulatory areas and all closures including NEAFC RA 3 (XBS/Loophole) (indicated by white color).

NEAFC RA3 The snow crab fishery in NEAFC RA was constantly affected by efforts by Norway and Russia to limit the participation of EU vessels in this fishery despite the fact that it was conducted in international waters that belong to NEAFC regulatory area. Sedentary species are included into scope of NEAFC managed resources. Nevertheless, in 2015 both Norway and Russia objected exploratory fishing applications for new bottom fishery area from Lithuania, Latvia and Spain, supported by their national scientific institutions. Those objections were based on the shelf resources regulation principles established by UNCLOS. Despite the fact that up to the date Russia has not fulfilled its requirements by UNCLOS to confirm its extended shelf in Barents sea, on Sep 2 it informed EU that based on its domestic regulation it will enforce Russian rules in the international NEAFC waters immediately as it considers it now as Russian continental shelf. Same did Norway back in January 2016. On Sep 4 EU crabbers had to leave the area and halt all operation under the threat of Russian arrest. From that date all EU crabbers stay in port and experience a severe economic impact. The perspectives of solving this issue either by dialog of EC with Russia and/or Norway seem unclear.

Regulatory area 3 and VME zone According to the Recommendation on the protection of vulnerable marine ecosystems in the NEAFC Regulatory Area (Rec 19 2014: Protection of VME in NEAFC RA), NEAFC closed part of Regulatory Area 3 for fishing and left it only for scientific research. JSC Arcticc Fishing ordered scientific study ( Potential impact of crustacean traps on benthic habitats and species of vulnerable marine ecosystems (VME) in the Barents Sea ) in Lithuanian University Klaipėdos Universitetas. The study proved that crab po fishing gear does no damage to the bottom environment and confirmed possibilities to conduct exploratory crab pot fishing In accordance with Recommendation on the protection of vulnerable marine ecosystems in the NEAFC Regulatory Area article 6.6 (Rec 19 2014: Protection of VME in NEAFC RA) Still, we did not get the license for exploratory fishing and were forced to keep crab fishing on the reduced NEAFC regulated area. Figure2. The map of NEAFC regulatory area 3 (Loophole) (indicated by black color) and areas closed to protect VME, BAR1 (indicated by red color).

Svalbard treaty By 9 February 1920 the Spitsbergen Treaty was signed in Paris during the Versailles negotiations after World War I. In this treaty, international diplomacy recognized Norwegian sovereignty (the Norwegian administration went in effect by 1925) and oth principles relating to Svalbard. All threee snow crab catching EU nations are participant of this treaty. One of the treaty clause states: Non-discrimination: All citizens and all companies of every nation under the treaty allowed to become residents and to have access to Svalbard including the right to fish, hunt or undertake any kind of maritime, industrial, mining or trade activity. Th residents of Svalbard must follow Norwegian law though Norwegian authority cann discriminate against or favor any residents of any given nationality. Starting summer 2015 most of Norwegian crabbers moved their activity to Svalbard waters bordering NEAFC RA as snow crab expanded there. This area is often seen a an extension to NEAFC RA crab fishing grounds but it is governed by completely different regime.

The most likely future distribution of this Arctic cold water species suggests that of these catches will be in the east part of the Svalbard zone which still probably be rather cold even in times of global warming (Hvingel and Sundet, 2014). Misun O.A., et al., Norwegian fisheries in the Svalbard zone since 1980. Regulations, profitability and warming waters affect landings, Polar Science (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2016.02.001 Assessment and management of invasive crab stocks in the Barents Sea. Worksh Stockholm, 3-6 September 2014, Spatial issues in Arctic Marine Resource Governance, Sergey Bakanev Polar Research Institute (PINRO), Murmansk, Russi

Red- king crab, Green- snow crab

Fishing Norway formally introduced ban for snow crab catching in EEZ, SFPZ, continental sh and international waters, but in year 2016 granted exclusions to 20 Norwegian vesse Under current regulations, only Norwegian vessels can be subject for such exclusion which contradicts with the EU position presented in the Note verbale. Norwegian vessels are engaged in a commercial fishing of snow crab from 2014 in NEAFC and SFPZ, but starting July 2015 nearly all fishing efforts by Norwegian crabb is concentrated in the Svalbard zone. Despite 20 issued snow crab licenses, the number of boats actually engaged in fishin of SC is smaller: 2014 9 boats 2105 11 boats 2016 Jan 1 N0v 07 10 boats in Svalbard 1,846t 3,658t 4,510t Note that only 5 boats are catching on regular basis in 2016 ( Prowess, Rostnesvaag, Arctic Pioneer, Northeastern, Polaris) This gives average catches of 902 tons per vessel. By the end of this year it may reach the level of 1000-1200 tone per vessel.

Communicationn with organizations Crab fishing vessels were submitting needed reports the catch and accurate coordinates, according to (NEAFC Scheme of Control and Enforcement 2014) though it wasn t obligatory even under the recommendations of Lithuanian Fisheries service under the Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Lithuania. The crab fishing companies of the European Union are ready to be submitting the needed reports under Agreed rec cord of Conclusions of Fisheries Consultations between Norway and the European Union on Electronic Exchange of catch and activity data Brussels, 29 September 2011 (Ref. Ares(2011)1031948-29/09/2011) when fishing in the Svalbard zone. Fishing companies agree to provide a researcher onboard the vessels or for scientific information upon the request from the EU.

Crab fishing pots All fishing gear when left at sea is marked with exact coordinates and vessel reports this information to all interested parties. The buoys are always marked in bright colors. Regular exchange (2-4 times per day) of gear position information among all boats in the are e-mail. Coordination between crabbers and trawlers masters regarding planned time and p of their efforts. The fishing gear consists of the line (approx. fro 1000m to 4100 m long), held by two anchors (weight ~ 100 kg, dimensions ~850x1850x1850 mm). Along the main line from 50 to 200 pots a attached by 2 m line in 20 m intervals. The diam of pots is 1050 mm, height 600 mm, weight kg. The net is made from polypropylene, mesh 60x60 mm, the size of degradable escape vent 400x500 mm.