Categorizing Cyclists: What Do We Know? Insights from Portland, OR

Similar documents
FOUR TYPES OF CYLISTS? EXAMINING A TYPOLOGY TO BETTER UNDERSTAND BICYCLING BEHAVIOR AND POTENTIAL

Cycling Master Plan Community Engagement Session WELCOME

2017 North Texas Regional Bicycle Opinion Survey

Community & Transportation Preferences Survey

Where do People Bicycle? The Role of Infrastructure in Determining Bicycle Behavior

Physical Implications of Complete Streets Policies

The Cycling Gender Gap: What Can We Learn From Girls?

When composing the study, our primary source for content analysis was a study

Community & Transportation Preferences Survey U.S. Metro Areas, 2015 July 23, 2015

Toronto Complete Streets Guidelines

Investment in Active Transport Survey

Bike/Multipurpose Trail Study for Glynn County, Georgia MAY 16, 2016

Driverless Vehicles Potential Influence on Bicyclist Facility Preferences

Health, Transportation and Bicycling: Connecting the Dotted Lines

Bicycle Facilities Planning

CYCLING STRATEGY RESEARCH PUBLIC TELEPHONE SURVEY JANUARY HarGroup Management Consultants

Measuring and growing active modes of transport in Auckland

Webinar: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Protected Cycling Facilities: Lessons from Five Cities

Baseline Survey of New Zealanders' Attitudes and Behaviours towards Cycling in Urban Settings

APPENDIX D. BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN AWARENESS SURVEY (Completed by Zogby International)

National Association of REALTORS National Smart Growth Frequencies

From Protected Bike Lanes to Robust Bikeway Networks

Bellevue Downtown Association Downtown Bike Series

Lessons from the Green Lanes: Evaluating Protected Bike Lanes

Bicycle Corrals Portland Designing Streets NYC October 25, 2012 Roger Geller, Bicycle Coordinator Portland, OR

10TH & 13TH STREET ROADWAY RECONFIGURATION & PROTECTED BICYCLE LANE PROJECTS

Monday, March 18, pm Vaughan City Hall

Bike Equity in Chicago:

Bicycling Perceptions and Experiences in Oregon and Southwest Washington. Presented By: The Inavero Institute September 8, 2009

AS91430: Cycleways Waiopehu College Year 13 Geography Matt Reeves

News Release. Millennials Favor Walkable Communities, Says New NAR Poll MEDIA COMMUNICATIONS

Bike Planner Overview

Lessons from the Green Lanes:

WALK- AND bike-friendly TURLOCK

Master Transportation Plan Bicycle Element Survey

Determining bicycle infrastructure preferences A case study of Dublin

September The State of Bicycling in Montgomery County

Seattle Department of Transportation. Web Panel Survey February 2018

Proposed Bridge Street East Bicycle Lanes Public Open House Thursday, April 27, 2017

Evaluation of Bike Boxes at Signalized Intersections [Presentation]

2014/2015 BIKE ROUTE PLAN 83 AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANE

2018 Transportation Survey October 17, Prepared by:

Proposed White Flint Separated Bike Lane Network September 2015

cyclingincities opinion survey ABOUT THE STUDY WHO DID WE ASK? WHAT DID WE DO?

Planning Suburban Bike Networks

Active and Green: Healthy Communities Are Sustainable Communities

Completing the Street: Denning Drive

Methodology. Reconnecting Milwaukee: A BikeAble Study of Opportunity, Equity and Connectivity

Matt Dykstra PSU MGIS Program

Tuesday, September 25 th Mount Holly Municipal Complex 400 East Central Avenue 5:30pm to 7:30pm. Activity Stations o Where do you Live?

Stress Bikeway Network

Amador County Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan Survey Results

The Influence of Bike Lane Buffer Types on Perceived Comfort and Safety of Bicyclists and Potential Bicyclists

Bike Score: Applying Research to Build Web-Based Tools to Promote Cycling

2017 Northwest Arkansas Trail Usage Monitoring Report

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION

Bikeway action plan. Bicycle Friendly Community Workshop March 5, 2007 Rochester, MN

Bicycling Perceptions and Experiences in Oregon and Southwest Washington. Presented to: The Bicycle Transportation Alliance September 8, 2009

CITY OF CAMBRIDGE 2015 BICYCLE PLAN TOWARDS A BIKABLE FUTURE

Traffic Safety Barriers to Walking and Bicycling Analysis of CA Add-On Responses to the 2009 NHTS

Color your stress away

2014/2015 BIKE ROUTE PLAN 83 AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANE

Bicycle Boulevards and Neighborhood Greenways

Watertown Complete Streets Prioritization Plan. Public Meeting #1 December 14, 2017

MASTER BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN

PBIC Webinar. How to Create a Bicycle Safety Action Plan: Planning for Safety [IMAGE] Oct. 2, 2014, 2 pm

General Design Factors

d+80% d+77% d+55% d+7% d+6% d+18%

DKS & WASHINGTON COUNTY Washington County Transportation Survey

Plant City Walk-Bike Plan

ACCOMMODATING THE 8 TO 80. OTEC October 26, 2016

A Summary of Recent Evaluations of Cycling Facilities in Portland, OR

Dowling/Beaty Cycling Route

APPENDIX D LEVEL OF TRAFFIC STRESS METHODOLOGY

Bike Routes Assessment: 95 Ave, 106 St & 40 Ave. Replace with appropriate image in View > Master.

International Physical Activity Prevalence Study SELF-ADMINISTERED ENVIRONMENTAL MODULE

Lessons from Copenhagen. John L Bowman 2013

FHWA Bikeway Selection Guide

All Agenda and Abilities Cycling Network

Bicycle Network Planning: The Target Audience Approach

U.S. Bicycling Participation Study

MONTGOMERY COUNTY COUNCIL

Who is Toole Design Group?

Bicycle-Pedestrian Master Plan: Chapters 3 and 4 Distribution

City Snapshot September 27, 2018

Update on Regional Bicycle, Pedestrian, & Trail Planning. Presented to TCC November 21, 2014

TYPES OF CYCLING. Figure 1: Types of Cycling by Gender (Actual) Figure 2: Types of Cycling by Gender (%) 65% Chi-squared significance test results 65%

Bicycle Transportation Budget Plan: Lawrence, KS

Cyclists and Bikeways: What s your match? A guide to bikeway options for a variety of cyclists

Rail Station Fact Sheet CentrePort/DFW Airport Station

IBPI: Bicycle and Pedestrian Education Program

The Wiggle Route in Context

Bike lanes for. Everyone

IMPACT OF BICYCLE INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS IN NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA. Kathryn M. Parker MPH, Janet Rice PhD, Jeanette Gustat PhD

Candidate Survey Results In October 2014, HUB. Survey Participation as % of all registered candidates. Question 1 answer distribution

o n - m o t o r i z e d transportation is an overlooked element that can greatly enhance the overall quality of life for the community s residents.

The European Certification Standard (ECS) objectives, principles and methodology. Ben McEldowney,

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IN SMITHS FALLS, ONTARIO; A COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO SITES

Shared Lane Markings: When and Where to Use Them. Mike Sallaberry, SFMTA Pro Walk/Pro Bike in Seattle September 4, 2008

Summary of Travel Trends Findings from the 2017 NHTS. Nancy McGuckin, Travel Behavior Analyst Anthony Fucci, Westat

Transcription:

Categorizing Cyclists: What Do We Know? Insights from Portland, OR Jennifer Dill, Ph.D. Professor, Urban Studies & Planning Director, Oregon Transportation Research & Education Consortium (OTREC) Portland State University Portland, OR, USA Velo-City Global 2012, Vancouver, BC, June 26, 2012

Portland s Four Types Roger Geller, Bicycle Coordinator, Portland Office of Transportation, Four Types of Cyclists http://www.portlandonline.com/transportation/index.cfm?a=264746&c=44597

Who are they? Strong & Fearless will ride in Portland regardless of roadway conditions Enthused & Confident comfortable sharing the roadway with automotive traffic, but they prefer to do so operating on their own facilities They appreciate bicycle lanes and bicycle boulevards attracted to cycling in Portland by its bicycle network and supporting infrastructure About 60% of this group may now ride regularly for transportation

Who are they? Interested but Concerned curious about bicycling They like riding a bicycle But, they are afraid to ride. Very few of these people regularly ride bicycles No Way No How not interested in bicycling at all, for reasons of topography, inability, or simply a complete and utter lack of interest. The separation between these four broad groups is not generally clear-cut likely quite a bit of blurring

Where did they come from?

This Research Objectives Validate the Four Types or develop an alternative way of categorizing Portland s cyclists and noncyclists Identify how to increase cycling for transportation, i.e. what is the market and what do they want? Funding OTREC City of Portland

Survey Methodology Random phone survey of adults in the Portland, OR metropolitan area Sample included both land-line and mobile phone numbers July 19 August 10, 2011 Response rates: 19.5% of eligible numbers 35.0% of resolved numbers Data were weighted by sex and age to reflect to population, using 2010 Census

Overview of Process Step 1: Level of comfort Based upon stated level of comfort bicycling on non-residential streets with and without bike lanes Step 2: Interest in bicycling more Step 3: Current cycling behavior Utilitarian/Transportation Recreation-only cycling Not cycling

Step 1: Level of Comfort I'm going to read a list of places you could ride a bike. For each place, please tell me how comfortable you would feel biking there using a scale of 1 to 4, with 1 meaning you would be "very uncomfortable," and 4 meaning you would be "very comfortable." These are hypothetical scenarios. A path or trail separate from the street.

Step 1: Level of Comfort a two-lane neighborhood commercial shopping street with traffic speeds of 25-30 miles per hour, on-street car parking, and no bike lane. What if a striped bike lane was added? a major urban or suburban street with four lanes, onstreet parking, traffic speeds of 30-35 miles per hour, and no bike lane. What if a striped bike lane was added? a major street with two lanes in each direction, a center divider, on-street parking, traffic speeds of 35-40 miles per hour, and no bike lane. What if a striped bike lane was added?

Step 1: Level of Comfort Level of Comfort Category Possible Type Average 3.5 for nonresidential street scenarios without bike lanes Average 3.5 for nonresidential street scenarios with bike lanes Average < 3.5 for nonresidential street scenarios with bike lanes Average 1.5 on paths or trails separate from the street Physically unable to ride a bicycle or don t know how to ride a bicycle Very comfortable on non-residential streets without bike lanes Very comfortable on non-residential streets with bike lanes Not very comfortable on non-residential streets with bike lanes Very uncomfortable bicycling Unable/Don t know Strong and Fearless Enthused and Confident Interested but Concerned Now Way No How Now Way No How

Step 2: Interest in Cycling Please tell me if you strongly disagree, somewhat disagree, somewhat agree, or strongly agree. I would like to travel by bike more than I do now.

Step 2: Interest in Cycling Comfort Category Very comfortable on nonresidential streets without bike lanes Very comfortable on nonresidential streets with bike lanes Not very comfortable on non-residential streets with bike lanes Very uncomfortable bicycling Unable/Don t know I would like to travel by bike more than I do now. Agreed strongly or somewhat Disagreed strongly or somewhat Possible Type Strong and Fearless Enthused and Confident Interested but Concerned Now Way No How Now Way No How Now Way No How

Step 2: Interest in Cycling But, some people who are uncomfortable and are not interested in cycling more have bicycled for transportation in the past 30 days

Step 2: Interest in Cycling Comfort Category Very comfortable on nonresidential streets without bike lanes Very comfortable on nonresidential streets with bike lanes Not very comfortable on non-residential streets with bike lanes I would like to travel by bike more than I do now. Either Either Agreed strongly or somewhat Disagreed and cycled for transportation in past 30 days Disagreed and did not cycle for transportation in past 30 days Final Type Strong and Fearless Enthused and Confident Interested but Concerned Interested but Concerned Now Way No How

Categories are consistent with level of concern about motor vehicles If or when I ride a bike, I'm concerned about being hit by a motor vehicle 11% 18% 39% 57% 41% 21% Strongly agree 12% Somewhat agree Somewhat disagree 30% 45% 33% 50% Strongly disagree 8% 10% 5% 6% No Way No How Interested but Concerned 15% Enthused and Confident Strong and Fearless

Distribution of Adults Type Strong & Fearless Enthused & Confident Interested but Concerned No Way No How Description Very comfortable without bike lanes City of Portland Rest of region All 6% 2% 4% Very comfortable with bike lanes 9% 9% 9% Not very comfortable, interested in biking more Not very comfortable, currently cycling for transportation but not interested in biking more Physically unable or don t know Very uncomfortable on paths Not very comfortable, not interested, not cycling for transportation 60% 53% 56% 25% 37% 31% Notes: May not total 100% due to rounding. Data are weighted by sex & age to reflect population

Step 3: Current Behavior Over the past month, about how many days did you ride a bike? Of those days, about how many days did you ride a bike to work or school? Of those days, about how many days did you ride a bike to shop, dine out, run errands, visit people, go to a movie, or similar activities? In a typical summer month, how many days do you ride a bicycle for commuting or other transportation? In a typical winter month, how many days do you ride a bicycle for commuting or other transportation?

Step 3: Current Behavior Non-cyclist Zero times in the past 30 days OR I never ride a bicycle (screening question) Utilitarian cyclist Once in the past 30 days for work, school, shopping, etc. AND Once a month in the typical summer OR winter month Recreational cyclist Once in the past 30 days Not classified as utilitarian

Step 3: Current Cycling Behavior Type Strong & Fearless Enthused & Confident Interested but Concerned No Way No How Description Utilitar ian Recrea tional Noncyclist Unable /don t know Total Very comfortable without bike lanes 42% 21% 36% 100% Very comfortable with bike lanes 46% 31% 23% 100% Uncomfortable and interested Uncomfortable, currently cycling for transportation but not interested in doing more Physically unable or don t know Very uncomfortable on paths Uncomfortable, not interested, not cycling for transportation 43% 30% 28% 100% 14% 46% 40% 100% Notes: Includes the entire Portland region (Oregon only) May not total 100% due to rounding. Data are weighted by sex & age to reflect population

Unable/Don t know how to ride 12.5% Non-cyclist 14.3% No Way No How (31%) Recreational cyclist 4.5% Non-cyclist 15.5% Recreational cyclist 16.6% Interested but Concerned (56%) Utilitarian cyclist 23.8% Non-cyclist Recreational cyclist Utilitarian cyclist Non-cyclist Recreational cyclist Utilitarian cyclist 2.1% 2.7% 4.2% 0.8% 1.6% 1.3% Enthused & Confident (9%) Strong & Fearless (4%)

Amount of Utilitarian Cycling in a Typical Summer Month 46% 43% 43% 0-9 days 10-19 days 38% 36% 20-31 days 30% 24% 19% 21% Intersted but Concerned - Util. cyclist Enthused & Confident - Util. cyclist Strong & Fearless - Util. cyclist

Amount of Utilitarian Cycling in a Typical Winter Month 78% 0-9 days 10-19 days 20-31 days 79% 53% 29% 13% 10% 18% 21% Intersted but Concerned - Util. cyclist Enthused & Confident - Util. cyclist 0% Strong & Fearless - Util. cyclist

Interested but Concerned are newer to cycling About how long have you been bicycling regularly for commuting or other transportation? < 6 months 6-12 months > 1 year Interested but Concerned Utilitarian cyclist 11% 15% 74% Enthused & Confident Utilitarian cyclist 5% 0% 95%

Gender All Strong & Fearless - Util. cyclist Strong & Fearless - Rec. cyclist Strong & Fearless - Non-cyclist Enthused & Confident - Util. cyclist Enthused & Confident - Rec. cyclist Enthused & Confident - Non-cyclist Intersted but Concerned - Util. cyclist 20% 14% 27% 22% 20% 43% 51% 47% Interested but Concerned - Rec. cyclist 43% Interested but Concerned - Non-cyclist No Way No How - Rec. cyclist No Way No How - Non-cyclist 52% 58% 63% No Way No How - Unable/Don't Know 78% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% % of Type that are Women

Age All Strong & Fearless - Util. cyclist 32% 93% 31% 7% Strong & Fearless - Rec. cyclist 50% 13% Strong & Fearless - Non-cyclist 100% 0% Enthused & Confident - Util. cyclist Enthused & Confident - Rec. cyclist 19% 20% 14% 20% 18 to 34 35 to 54 Enthused & Confident - Non-cyclist 32% 37% 55 or older Intersted but Concerned - Util. cyclist 47% 17% Interested but Concerned - Rec. cyclist 34% 20% Interested but Concerned - Non-cyclist 22% 37% No Way No How - Rec. cyclist 29% 19% No Way No How - Non-cyclist 25% 42% No Way No How - Unable/Don't Know 11% 73%

Differences in Environment Many of the places I need to get to regularly are within biking distance of my home. 63% 66% Strong and Fearless Enthused and Confident Interested but Concerned The speed of traffic on most nearby streets is usually slow. 59% 76% There is so much traffic along nearby streets that it would make it difficult or unpleasant to bike. 20% 51% There is so much traffic along the street I live on that it would make it difficult or unpleasant to bike. 9% 24% There are quiet streets, without bike lanes, that are easy to get to on a bike. 89% 96% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Differences in Individuals Biking for commuting or transportation requires me to wear different clothes than normal. 64% 74% I would like to learn how to ride more safely in traffic. 59% 60% Strong and Fearless Enthused and Confident Interested but Concerned I know how to ride a bike safely in traffic. 93% 100% I would feel comfortable riding my bike in my neighborhood after dark. 57% 76% I don't have time to bike places instead of driving. 43% 58% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Experience as a kid When you were under the age of 16, how often did you ride a bike to school? No Way No How - Non-cyclist No Way No How - Rec. cyclist Interested but Concerned - Non-cyclist Interested but Concerned - Rec. cyclist 63% 68% 42% 51% Intersted but Concerned - Util. cyclist 53% Never Occasionally Frequently Enthused & Confident - Non-cyclist Enthused & Confident - Rec. cyclist 37% 36% Enthused & Confident - Util. cyclist 35% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

What about different facilities? A major urban or suburban street with four lanes, on-street parking, traffic speeds of 30-35 miles per hour, and no bike lane What if a striped bike lane was added? What if it also had a wide bike lane separated from traffic by a raised curb or parked cars?

Potentially a large effect on the Interested but Concerned 100% 80% 4 (Very Comfortable) 3 60% 40% 20% 2% 43% 6% 96% 95% 100% 97% 88% 20% 2% 0% 1% 1% No bike facility with a bike lane separated lane No bike facility with a bike lane separated lane No bike facility with a bike lane separated lane No bike facility with a bike lane separated lane No Way No How Interested but Concerned Enthused & Confident Strong & Fearless

Limitations, etc. Phone survey likely misses the invisible cyclist Unclear how transferable findings are to other regions How does comfort level change with experience?

Next Steps, etc. Next steps Further analysis Develop other typologies from scratch Your ideas are welcome! Contact information web.pdx.edu/~jdill