Transportation Development Act Grant Center Avenue Pedestrian Signal Project

Similar documents
Transportation Development Act Grant Radar Check Speed Signs

Staff Report. Victoria Walker, Director of Community and Economic Development

APPROVE A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

CITY OF SIGNAL HILL Cherry Avenue Signal Hill, CA

PRESENTER: Christopher J. Blunk, Deputy Public Works Director / City Engineer

Item 08M 1 of 9

Background Planning Committee STAFF REPORT March 7, 2018 Page 2 of 2 On June 21, 2017, the Authority approved the programming of second cycle One Bay

WHEREAS, the New Jersey Department of Transportation' s Complete Streets

BD RESOLUTION NO RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE VISION ZERO RAMP INTERSECTION STUDY PHASE 1

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

a contract for Zone A Roadside Landscape Maintenance Services and Resolution No awarding

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

City Council Agenda Item #6-A CITY OF ALAMEDA Memorandum. To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. John A. Russo City Manager

Michael Parmer, Management Aide, City Manager's Office

AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY. Ordinance : Amending the Los Altos Municipal Code Reassigning Commission Responsibility for Transportation Issues

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS. RESOLUTION No

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

FUNDING SOURCES CHAPTER 6

The total net revenue to the City for the previous four fiscal years was $255,856.

TO: Karen P. Brust, City n r - ~~

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

PISMO BEACH COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY March 5, 2019 City Council

RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MENLO PARK ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

ORDINANCE NO E AN ORDINANCE OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FISHERS, INDIANA, ADDING OPERATION OF MOTORVEHICLES AND BICYCLES IN

CITY OF LOS ALTOS CITY COUNCIL MEETING May 10, 2016

MEMORANDUM TERESA MCCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR

MEASURE B AND MEASURE BB Annual Program Compliance Report Reporting Fiscal Year AGENCY CONTACT INFORMATION

RESOLUTION. Trustee, seconded by Trustee., introduced the following proposed local law, to

CITY CLERK. (City Council on October 2, 3 and 4, 2001, adopted this Clause, without amendment.)

Pedestrian Crossing Guidelines 2016

AGENDA ITEM F-5 Public Works

BICYCLE AND TRAILS ADVISORY COMMISSION Meeting Minutes

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

City of Palo Alto (ID # 7812) City Council Staff Report

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Contract: AJW Construction for the 2013 Safe Routes to School Project

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION CHAPTER 8

Borough of Danville, PA Traffic Calming Program Guidelines

ITEM 3 ATTACHMENT A RESOLUTION NO

AGENDA ITEM H-3 Public Works

TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL GUIDELINES FOR HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSINGS

REVIEW OF LOCAL TRAFFIC FLOW / LONG RANGE PLANNING SOLUTIONS STUDY

BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE (BPAC)

REPORT TO FRESNO COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS STEVE BRANDT, QUAD KNOPF ASSISTANT PROJECT MANAGER THROUGH: LAUREN DAWSON, FRESNO COG PROJECT MANAGER

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Chapter 4: Funding and Implementation

Staff Report City of Manhattan Beach

Appendix H RESPONSES TO PUBLIC COMMENTS

Roadway Classification Design Standards and Policies. Pueblo, Colorado November, 2004

Crosswalk Policy Revisions & Pedestrian & Bicycle Connection Plans. Presentation to Sanibel City Council July 16, 2013

PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

ORDINANCE NO

Staff Report. Jeff Rogers, Infrastructure Maintenance Manager (925)

Complete Streets Checklist Process

General Plan Circulation Element Update Scoping Meeting April 16, 2014 Santa Ana Senior Center, 424 W. 3rd Street, Santa Ana, CA 92701

TRANSPORTATION TRAINING TOPICS. April 6, 2010

SOLANA BEACH BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION PLAN SECOND ADDENDUM

Blue Ribbon Commission Report Recommendations on Pedestrian and Bicycle Infrastructure Improvements

4APNOIPF Vh, YII PTC CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT. Honorable Mayor and City Council Members. 8K TH 63 River Crossing Bridge Replacement Project

New Measure A Expenditure Categories DEFINITIONS OF ELIGIBLE EXPENDITURES Adopted March 8, 2007

Agenda. Overview PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Request for Proposals Contra Costa County Contra Costa Centre I 680/Treat Boulevard Bicycle & Pedestrian Plan

Houma-Thibodaux Metropolitan Planning Organization STP<200K Funding Application APPLICATION

Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration

Public Comment Period/Council Comments. Public Hearing: FY 2016 Final Budget Hearing. Resolution No. 669, FY 2016 Mill Levy

PURPOSE AND POLICY GUIDANCE

Dr. M.L. King, Jr. Street North Complete Streets Resurfacing Opportunities HOUSING, LAND USE, AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MARCH 22, 2018

Citizens Advisory Committee March 26, 2014

City of San Diego Vision Zero Draft Strategic Plan FY 2017

CITY OF SEBASTOPOL CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

RESOLUTION NO ?? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NEPTUNE BEACH ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Americans with Disabilities Act Transition Plan for Public Right-of-Way Improvements

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY & PROCEDURES

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Executive Summary

CITY OF LOMITA CITY COUNCIL REPORT

Omaha s Complete Streets Policy

Summary: Mercer County Princeton Avenue & Spruce Street Study January 2009

AUTHORIZE BID ADVERTISEMENT

Double the amount of bicycle ridership while at the same time reducing the number of bicycle crashes by one-third.

25th Avenue Road Diet Project A One Year Evaluation. Transportation Fund for Clean Air Project #05R07

NM-POLICY 1: Improve service levels, participation, and options for non-motorized transportation modes throughout the County.

San Francisco s Capital Plan & the Mayor s Transportation Task Force 2030: Funding the next steps for transportation

LAUREL HEIGHTS/JORDAN PARK TRAFFIC CALMING PROJECT DECEMBER 2012

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION

REVISED ORDINANCE NO. O

TRAFFIC ACTION PLAN. Laurie Meadows Neighborhood CITY OF SAN MATEO

AGENDA ITEM G-2 Public Works

Van Ness Avenue Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) San Francisco Environment Commission Policy Committee

Complete Streets Policy DAVID CRONIN, P.E., CITY ENGINEER

CRESTON ROAD COMPLETE AND SUSTAINABLE STREETS CORRIDOR PLAN

AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT TRANSITION PLAN LEON COUNTY FOR CURB RAMPS AND SIDEWALKS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. 1 P age

INTER- AND INTRA-CONNECTIVITY INTERPRETIVE GUIDELINES

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. North Harrison Street (Lee Highway to Little Falls Road) Comparative Analysis. Prepared for:

BIA INDIAN HIGHWAY SAFETY PROGRAM FY2016 TRAFFIC RECORDS GRANT. SECTION A: General Information. This section must be completed for all applicants.

SECTION TRAFFIC REGULATIONS

AGENDA REPORT. For the Agenda of July 6, 2015

Transcription:

CITY OF MARTINEZ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA April 15, 2015 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: Mayor and City Council Tim Tucker, City Engineer Transportation Development Act Grant Center Avenue Pedestrian Signal Project April 2, 2015 RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolution requesting the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for allocation of Fiscal Year 2015 2016 Transportation Development Act Article 3 Center Avenue Pedestrian/Bicycle Project funding. BACKGROUND: Staff presented a TDA draft grant application to the Countywide Bicycle Advisory Committee to install a pair of overhead pedestrian signals on Center Avenue south of Muir Road. This is a heavily used crosswalk. Also the crosswalk is at an uncontrolled intersection with opposing driveways to private property. The crosswalk connects Contra Costa County offices to leased parking areas within the Nob Hill Shopping Center. The crosswalk has been a constant source of complaints due to drivers failing to yield to pedestrians. A pedestrian (Contra Costa County employee) was struck by a southbound vehicle approximately two years ago. The City had installed enhanced signage and striping at the crosswalk to improve pedestrian safety at the crosswalk. These improvements have not been successful in reducing the problem. The City has tested other lower cost crosswalk improvements such as lighted crosswalks and flashing strobe signs at other locations. The City has found these improvements to be problematic as they require replacement and high maintenance. The overhead flashing signals have been used by the City near this location with a higher success. Due to the width and curvature of Center Avenue one pedestrian signal is required for each direction of travel.

FISCAL IMPACT: Item Anticipated GrantCity Match Total Construction $70,000 $60,000 $130,000 Engineering/Inspection $0 $28,750 $ 28,750 Contingency $0 $ 6,750 $ 6,750 Totals $70,000 $95,500 $165,500 Should the City be successful in securing this TDA grant, an allocation of $95,500 in City Gas Tax or Measure J Return to Source Funds will be required to complete funding for the project. ACTION: Adopt resolution request to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for the allocation of Fiscal Year 2015 2016 Transportation Development Act Article 3 Pedestrian/Bicycle Project funding. Attachments: Sample Signal Location Map Resolution APPROVED BY: Rob Braulik, City Manager 2

Below is a photo of similar pedestrian flasher to that proposed in the grant:

RESOLUTION NO. -15 REQUEST TO THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION FOR THE ALLOCATION OF FISCAL YEAR 2015-2016 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT ARTICLE 3 PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE PROJECT FUNDING WHEREAS, Article 3 of the Transportation Development Act (TDA), Public Utilities Code (PUC) Section 99200 et seq., authorizes the submission of claims to a regional transportation planning agency for the funding of projects exclusively for the benefit and/or use of pedestrians and bicyclists; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), as the regional transportation planning agency for the San Francisco Bay region, has adopted MTC Resolution No.4108, entitled Transportation Development Act, Article 3, Pedestrian and Bicycle Projects, which delineates procedures and criteria for submission of requests for the allocation of TDA Article 3 funding; and WHEREAS, MTC Resolution No. 4108 requires that requests for the allocation of TDA Article 3 funding be submitted as part of a single, countywide coordinated claim from each county in the San Francisco Bay region; and WHEREAS, the City of Martinez desires to submit a request to MTC for the allocation of TDA Article 3 funds to support the projects described in Attachment B to this resolution, which are for the exclusive benefit and/or use of pedestrians and/or bicyclists. NOW THEREORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Martinez declares it is eligible to request an allocation of TDA Article 3 funds pursuant to Section 99234 of the Public Utilities Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that there is no pending or threatened litigation that might adversely affect the project or projects described in Attachment B to this resolution, or that might impair the ability of the City of Martinez to carry out the project; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the project has been reviewed by the countywide Bicycle Advisory Committee and has been approved by MTC to use the countywide BAC and the countywide BAC provides for expanded representation of City of Martinez and the designated representative familiar with the bicycle and pedestrian needs of City of Martinez; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City of Martinez attests to the accuracy of and approves the statements in Attachment A to this resolution; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution and its attachments, and any accompanying supporting materials shall be forwarded to the congestion management agency, countywide transportation planning agency, or county association of governments, as the case may be, of Contra Costa County for submission to MTC as part of the countywide coordinated TDA Article 3 claim. * * * * * * I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Martinez at a Regular Meeting of said Council held on the 15 th day of April, 2015, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: RICHARD G. HERNANDEZ, CITY CLERK CITY OF MARTINEZ

Resolution No. - 15 Attachment A REQUEST TO THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION FOR THE ALLOCATION OF FISCAL YEAR 2015-2016 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT ARTICLE 3 PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE PROJECT FUNDING Findings Page 1 of 1 1. That the City of Martinez is not legally impeded from submitting a request to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for the allocation of Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 3 funds, nor is the City of Martinez legally impeded from undertaking the project(s) described in Attachment B of this resolution. 2. That the City of Martinez has committed adequate staffing resources to complete the project(s) described in Attachment B. 3. A review of the project(s) described in Attachment B has resulted in the consideration of all pertinent matters, including those related to environmental and right-of-way permits and clearances, attendant to the successful completion of the project(s). 4. Issues attendant to securing environmental and right-of-way permits and clearances for the projects described in Attachment B have been reviewed and will be concluded in a manner and on a schedule that will not jeopardize the deadline for the use of the TDA funds being requested. 5. That the project(s) described in Attachment B comply with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA, Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et seq.). 6. That as portrayed in the budgetary description(s) of the project(s) in Attachment B, the sources of funding other than TDA are assured and adequate for completion of the project(s). 7. That the project(s) described in Attachment B are for capital construction and/or design engineering; and/or for the maintenance of a Class I bikeway which is closed to motorized traffic; and/or for the purposes of restriping Class II bicycle lanes; and/or for the development or support of a bicycle safety education program; and/or for the development of a comprehensive bicycle and/or pedestrian facilities plan, and an allocation of TDA Article 3 funding for such a plan has not been received by the City of Martinez within the prior five fiscal years. 8. That the project(s) described in Attachment B is included in a locally approved bicycle, pedestrian, transit, multimodal, complete streets, or other relevant plan. 9. That any project described in Attachment B that is a bikeway meets the mandatory minimum safety design criteria published in Chapter 1000 of the California Highway Design Manual. 10. That the project(s) described in Attachment B will be completed before the funds expire. 11. That the City of Martinez agrees to maintain, or provide for the maintenance of, the project(s) and facilities described in Attachment B, for the benefit of and use by the public.

Resolution No. - 15 Attachment B Page 1 of 2 TDA Article 3 Project Application Form Fiscal Year of this Claim:2015/2016 Applicant: City of Martinez Contact person: Tim Tucker, City Engineer Mailing Address: 525 Henrietta St., Martinez, CA 94553 E-Mail Address: ttucker@cityofmartinez.org Telephone: (925) 372-3562 Secondary Contact (in event primary not available) Joe Enke E-Mail Address: jenke@cityofmartinez.org Telephone: (925) 372-3524 Short Title Description of Project: Center Avenue Pedestrian Signal Project Amount of claim: $125,000 Functional Description of Project: This project will construct an overhead pedestrian signal at an uncontrolled high pedestrian volume crosswalk. Financial Plan: TDA funding for Construction ($70,000). Local funds for Design, Environmental, Contingency, Project and Construction Management.($95,500) Project Elements: See Page 2, Project background and description Funding Source All Prior FYs Application FY Next FY Following FYs Totals TDA Article 3 $70,000 $70,000 list all other sources: 1. Local funding $95,500 $95,500 2. 3. 4. Totals $165,500 $165,500 Project Eligibility: A. Has the project been approved by the claimant's governing body? (If "NO," provide the approximate date approval is anticipated). B. Has this project previously received TDA Article 3 funding? If "YES," provide an explanation on a separate page. No C. For "bikeways," does the project meet Caltrans minimum safety design criteria pursuant to Chapter 1000 of the California Highway Design Manual? (Available on the internet via: http://www.dot.ca.gov). D. Has the project been reviewed by a Bicycle Advisory Committee (BAC)? (If "NO," provide an explanation). Enter date the project was reviewed by the BAC: E. Has the public availability of the environmental compliance documentation for the project (pursuant to CEQA) been evidenced by the dated stamping of the document by the county clerk or county recorder? (required only for projects that include construction). F. Will the project be completed before the allocation expires? Enter the anticipated completion date of project (month and year) June 2016 G. Have provisions been made by the claimant to maintain the project or facility, or has the claimant arranged for such maintenance by another agency? (If an agency other than the Claimant is to maintain the facility provide its name: By contract, Contra Costa County Signal Maintenance Division ) YES?/NO? No N/A No (pending) No Yes Yes

Attachment B Page 2 of 2 PROJECT BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTION Please accept our grant application to install a pair of overhead pedestrian signals on Center Avenue south of Muir Road. This is a heavily used crosswalk. The crosswalk is at an uncontrolled intersection with opposing driveways to private property. The crosswalk connects County offices to leased parking areas within the Nob Hill Shopping Center. The crosswalk has been a constant source of complaints due to drivers failing to yield to pedestrians. A pedestrian (County employee) was stuck by a south bound vehicle approximately two years ago. The City had installed enhanced signage and striping at the crosswalk to improve pedestrian safety at the crosswalk. These improvements have not been fully successful in reducing the problem. The City has tested other, lower cost, crosswalk improvements such as lighted crosswalks and flashing strobe signs at other locations. The City has found these improvements to be problematic and requiring replacement and high levels of maintenance. The overhead flashing signals have been used by the City nearby this location with a higher level of success. Due to the width and curvature of Center Avenue one pedestrian signal is required for each direction of travel.