Identifying and Executing Stream Projects Kristin Thomas, Aquatic Ecologist MITU
Introduction 1. Methods for Identifying Projects 2. Methods in Action 3. The Partnership Paradigm 2
River Stewards Program Goals Identify factors limiting a coldwater fishery Identify projects to address limiting factors Evaluate project success Protecting high-quality streams 3
What factors may limit a coldwater fishery? What do trout need?
Limiting Factors Temperature Habitat Fishery population dynamics 5
Instream Habitat Evaluation What types of instream habitat do coldwater fish need? 6
Habitat Mapping Protocols and Results Premise Analyze in-stream habitat in an entire river, or section of river to identify factor limiting the fishery Run, riffle, pool structure Substrate composition In-stream fish habitat (woody debris, deep water, aquatic vegetation) 7
Protocols Walk/float downstream from access point to access point Measure each run, riffle, and pool Visually estimate substrate composition and fish habitat in each run, riffle, and pool Run Riffle Pool 8
Sand Sand Gravel Cobble Silt 10% Cobble 20% Gravel 30% Sand 40% Silt Gravel
Rogue River Methods in Action 10 10
Taking a Project from Idea to Action Rogue River Home Rivers Initiative Project
Reconnect Inventory Assess Prioritize
Reconnect Monitoring
Restore Assess Inventory Prioritize
Restore Monitoring Restoration
Sustainability Engage Involve Empower
June 19-21, 2014 www.swmtu.org/rogueriverexpedition
Northern Michigan Methods in Action 20
Completed Rivers Habitat Mapping River Distance Mapped (Miles) Pigeon River 44.4 Black River 53.7 Pine River 48.4 Big Sable River 42.2 Platte River 18.5 Maple River (Below Dam) 4.8 21
Percent of River Results - Bedform 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Bedform Delineation Pigeon Black Pine Big Sable Platte Maple Pool Riffle Run 22
Percent of River Results - Substrate 100 Substrate Composition 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 Boulder Cobble Gravel Sand Silt Clay 0 Pigeon Black Pine Big Sable Platte Maple 23
Percent of River Results - Substrate Fine silt and sand Hard clay, gravel, cobble, and boulder 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Substrate Composition Pigeon Black Pine Big Sable Platte Maple Hard Fine 24
Percent of River Results Fish Habitat 70 In-stream Fish Habitat 60 50 40 30 Deep Vegetation Wood 20 10 0 Pigeon Black Pine Big Sable Platte Maple 25
Percent of Segment In-stream Fish Habitat Pine River 70 In-Stream Habitat by Segment 60 50 40 30 20 Vegetation Deep Wood 10 0 Segment 1 Segment 2 Segment 3 Segment 4 Segment 5 Segment 6 26
Percent Bedform Unit Woody Debris Pine River 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Percent Woody Debris Segment 5 27
Percent of Bedform Unit Aquatic Vegetation Pine River 100 Percent Aquatic Vegetation Segment 5 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 28
Percent of Bedform Unit Wood and Vegetation Pine River 100 Woody Debris and Aquatic Vegetation Segment 5 90 80 70 60 50 40 Aquatic Veg Wood 30 20 10 0 29
Percent of River Segment Bedform Delineation by Segment Big Sable 100 Bedform Delineation 80 60 40 20 Pool Riffle Run 0 Segment 1 segment 2 Segment 3 30
1 7.3 ft/mi 2 2.5 ft/mi 3 3.8 ft/mi
Percent of River Segment Bedform Delineation by Segment 100 Bedform Delineation 80 60 40 20 Pool Riffle Run 0 Segment 1 segment 2 Segment 3 32
Percent of River Bottom Big Sable Segment 3 100 Bedform Structure Segment 3 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 Pool Riffle Run 20 10 0 Big Sable 5 Big Sable 6 Big Sable 7 Big Sable 8 Big Sable 9 33
Length of Bedform Section (feet) Length of Bedform Section (feet) Bedform Composition Bedform Length Site 5 Bedform Length Site 7 800 Run 800 Run 700 600 Riffle Pool 700 600 Riffle Pool 500 500 400 400 300 300 200 200 100 100 0 0 34
Gradient Sections 5 and 7 Section 5 Section 7 35
Products Summary report Baseline data Identification of potential projects Partner meetings Presentation of data Collaborative effort project prioritization 36
Working with Partners 37
Completing the Project List Are there already stakeholder groups in the area? Do they already do stream work? Do they already have money? 38
Complete Projects Through Partners 1. Share data, reports, and ideas for priority projects. 2. Work through the group to identify specific projects and prioritization. 3. Getting quality work done is most important. 4. Who manages the project is less important. 39
Resources Program information http://www.michigantu.org/index.php/river-stewards-program Program data and sites http://www.michigantu.org/index.php/river-stewards-maps 40
Contact Information Kristin Thomas kthomas@michigantu.org 616.460.0477 41