Designated Universal Service Provider Condition 1.10 Consumer Protection Condition USP Access Condition 8.1

Similar documents
DUSP : Full Year Results Table 1: Domestic and EU Standards and Performance Targets Unadjusted and Force Majeure Adjusted Performance

DUSP Full Year Results Table 1: Domestic and EU Standards and Performance Targets Unadjusted and Force Majeure Adjusted Performance

Domestic & EU Standards and Performance Targets

DUSP Full Year Results Table 1: Domestic and EU Standards and Performance Targets Unadjusted and Force Majeure Adjusted Performance

DUSP Full Year Results Table 1: Domestic and EU Standards and Performance Targets Unadjusted and Force Majeure Adjusted Performance

Quarterly Quality of Service Report to Ofcom and Consumer Focus

Quarterly Quality of Service Report to Ofcom and Consumer Focus

Quarterly Quality of Service Report to Ofcom and Consumer Focus

Lightweight Roof Tiles Designed for Life. unique high performance shingles. Product Guide & Price List

Local communities fit for walking and cycling

Ship My Tri Bike by Nirvana Europe Transporting your bike fully assembled from anywhere in the UK & Ireland to your triathlon race

Covered. Football Grounds on the covers of programmes, handbooks and other club publications

UK & Ireland Winter offer Participating hotels

Date Day Time League Round Home Away 07/08/2018 Tue 19:45 Sky Bet Championship Match 4 Middlesbrough Sheffield United 19/08/2018 Sun 15:00 Sky Bet

STATISTICS ON FOOTBALL-RELATED ARRESTS & BANNING ORDERS SEASON Home Office 23 October 2004

Adagio Birmingham City Centre. Adagio Liverpool City Centre. Castle Hotel Windsor - MGallery by Sofitel

Regional Spread of Inbound Tourism

Route-level efficiency benefit sharing (REBS) mechanism baselines. 31 March 2014

Proportion of substandard bridges

Sektor Clicwall.

Commemorative Books Coverage List

1. The Promoter of this prize draw promotion (the prize draw ) is Volvo Car UK Limited, Scandinavia House, Norreys Drive, Maidenhead, SL6 4FL.

Sektor Moveable Walls

SCANCOMING UK FIXTURE LIST

Commemorative Books Coverage List

Sektor 25.

SFR01/2016: GCSE and equivalent results in England 2014/15 (Revised)

Commemorative Books Coverage List

28 Times Higher Education 18/25 December 2008

Commemorative Books Coverage List

Season 2018/19 8 th October 2018

Forwards. 50. Craig Bellamy 13/07/1979 Wales 78 caps. 49. Alexis Sanchez 19/12/1988 Chile 112 caps. 48. Nigel Clough 19/03/1966 England 14 caps

CLUBS IN FULL MEMBERSHIP

Premier League 2 and Professional Development League. No. 30

Strikers. 50. Bob Latchford 18/01/1951 England 12 caps. 49. Ronnie Allen 15/01/1929 England 5 caps

SCANCOMING UK FOOTBALL LIST

Commemorative Books Coverage List

POSTAL AUCTION ISSUE 90 Closing Date: THUR 7 TH DECEMBER 2017

Year Football Related Of the 126 football related incidents there were 4 reports of damage:

SCANCOMING UK FIXTURE LIST

CLUB AND PLAYER LINKS

Central Attacking Midfielders / Deep-Lying Playmakers. 50. Andy King 29/10/1988 Wales 39 caps. 49. Gordon Cowans 27/10/1958 England 10 caps

RECORD VICTORIES. (to and including the 2016/17 season) Except where stated, the highest scores also indicate record margins of victory

Results. North. South. 1-0 West Ham United 2-3 Aston Villa

Commemorative Books Coverage List

The First 25 Years of the Premier League

Footy Progs - Auctioneers & Valuers

Premier League 2 and Professional Development League. No. 3

Premier League 2 and Professional Development League. No. 26

Results. North. South. Wolverhampton Wanderers. 3-2 West Bromwich Albion. 5-0 Leicester City. 1-1 Southampton

1. MICHAM MATHESON 2. MICHAM MATHESON 3. BEVERLEY CUMMINGS GRAND BAY NEXT GENERATION MRS WENGER ''IN''

Premier League 2 and PDL Bulletin. No. 8

Premier League 2 and PDL Bulletin. No. 16

Commemorative Books Coverage List

Premier League 2 and Professional Development League Bulletin. No. 3

U18 Bulletin. No. 12

1. fully satisfy the educational base for an Incorporated Engineer (IEng) and an Engineering Technician (EngTech).

Premier League 2 and PDL Bulletin. No. 13

A SUMMER OF FOOTBALL IN 2016

English Lacrosse University Fixtures & Course Education Calendar

North Season 2016/ /09/2016

Premier League 2 and Professional Development League Bulletin. No. 10

Premier League 2 and PDL Bulletin. No. 2

The Thames Challenge Cup

2020 Training Programme 2018

Spurs finally top Premier League at least in terms of house price growth

WEHoRR 2018 Results. Finish Start Name Status Award Penalties Time. v2 25/04/2018 Page 1 of 8

12 EXTRA SPECIAL treats FOR YOU. from Novotel Hotels. Open them now! And discover a fantastic selection of offers to enjoy in 2017

Premier League 2 and PDL Bulletin. No. 4

Commemorative Books Coverage List

Premier League 2 and PDL Bulletin. No. 26

Premier League 2 and PDL Bulletin. No. 21

Premier League 2 and PDL Bulletin. No. 25

Premier League 2 and PDL Bulletin. No. 14

Premier League 2 and PDL Bulletin. No. 23

Results. North. South. 2-2 Newcastle United. 6-1 West Ham United 2-0 Southampton

Commemorative Books Coverage List

Final Results in Finish Order

FA COMPETITIONS DEPARTMENT BULLETIN 27 FRIDAY 26 FEBRUARY

Premier League 2 and PDL Bulletin. No. 28

U18 Premier League and U18 Professional Development League. No. 3

Highways England Creative M Welcome. Smart motorway M6 junctions 16 to 19 public information exhibition

Premier League 2 and PDL Bulletin. No. 30

Are We There Yet? IPv6 as Related to GDP per Capita. By Alain Durand November 28 th,` 2016

NGB Support Guidance for the Community Sports Coach Scheme

The Thames Challenge Cup

Premier League 2 and PDL Bulletin. No. 35

Premier League 2 and PDL Bulletin. No. 29

Commemorative Books Coverage List

The UK residential development market: Are we building enough homes and what is the pipeline of land to put them on?

University of Bath. Citation for published version: Curran, T & Standage, M 2018, ESPN's Greatest Sporting Cities Publication date: 2018

For further advice and information, please contact the central enquiries desk. Redefine BDL Groups Desk T:

Re: British Swimming Officials Course Information and Payment Process

Graduates from an accredited MEng degree will fully satisfy the educational base for a Chartered Engineer (CEng).

School Report Client Name: Report Type: Cycles Included: Technical Notes and Definitions

Premier League 2 and PDL Bulletin. No. 6

Premier League 2 and PDL Bulletin. No. 33

Programme of Events 2018

Premier League 2 and PDL Bulletin. No. 32

POSTAL AUCTION ISSUE 93 Closing Date: WEDS 2 ND MAY 2018

Transcription:

Designated Universal Service Provider Condition 1.10 Consumer Protection Condition 3.3.16 USP Access Condition 8.1 Quarterly Quality of Service and Complaints Report 2017-18 Quarter 4 Publication date: 11 May 2018

NATIONAL QUARTER 4 REPORT 2017-18 CONTENT PAGE Overview of Quality of Service Performance: Quarter 4 2017-18 1-2 Table 1 DUSP 1.10 Domestic and EU standards and performance targets 3 Table 2 DUSP 1.10 First Class Stamped and Metered Delivered in PCA 4 8 Table 3 USPA 8.1 Downstream Access Products 9 Table 4 Consumer Protection Condition 3.3.16: Consumer Complaints 10

OVERVIEW OF QUALITY OF SERVICE PERFORMANCE QUARTER 4 2017-18 In the quarter, the full-year Standards were achieved or exceeded by the Standard for Correctly Delivered Mail and USO Outgoing European mail. The results in the quarter for USO First Class, the geographical Standard for Delivered in the Postcode Areas, the USO Standard for Collections, the USO Standard for Deliveries and Special Delivery were below the full-year target. For USO Second Class, Royal Mail s overall performance of 98.4 per cent was within the 98.5 per cent target range when allowing for the margin of error in sampling. The Company notes the full year outcomes were significantly impacted by a number of exceptional events. These factors included a very challenging industrial relations environment, some very severe weather, Cyber Week falling outside the exemption period and significantly reduced staffing levels caused by the Australian flu outbreak. Royal Mail believes that, if 2017-18 performance was adjusted for these factors, we would have achieved our USO First Class target. Royal Mail will ask Ofcom to take these issues into consideration. It will be for Ofcom to decide. In the year to date, 71 of 118 postcode areas met or exceeded their targets. Allowing for the margin of error in sampling, 95 of 118 postcode areas were within the target range. The Company believes that, if the 2017-18 performance was adjusted for the exceptional events outlined above, an additional 44 postcodes would meet or exceed their targets. This would result in a total of 115 postcodes meeting or exceeding their targets, allowing for the margin of error in sampling. Domestic & Outgoing EU standards and performance targets Qtr 1 compared with Target Qtr 2 compared with Target Qtr 3 compared with Target Qtr 4 compared with Target USO 1st Class % +0.4-0.5-1.4-4.3 USO 2nd Class % +0.3 +0.3 +0.1-1.2 Special Delivery % -0.5-0.3-1.1-1.9 Postcode Area % Delivered -14-26 -45-97 % Of Collection Points Served Daily (USO) 0.01-0.02-0.01-2.01 % Of Delivery Routes Completed Daily (USO) -0.18-0.40-0.25-3.24 % Of Items Deemed Correctly Delivered +0.26 +0.22 +0.25 +0.24 USO Outgoing EU Services D+3 % +2.0 +0.3-3.3 +0.6 1

Notes: 1. DUSP condition 1.9 Tables 1 and 2 of the regulatory conditions detail the domestic and EU standards and performance targets. 2. The Quarter 4 reporting period for all measures was 2 January to 25 March 2018 (12 weeks). 3. Special Delivery has been adjusted for an overstatement of performance due to an incorrect handling of manual entries where no time of delivery has been recorded. 4. PCA performance figures exclude results from any panellists situated in locations that are not scheduled to receive a daily delivery and/or collection. Results from these panellists are, however, included in the national results. 5. The USO 1 st and 2 nd Class performance figures (overleaf and in table 1) include Single Piece PPI mail in addition to Stamped and Metered mail. 6. The percentage of collection points served daily (overleaf and in table 1) and the percentage of collections at or after the final advertised time (table 1) are based on collections from post boxes and Post Office branches only. The following report details results for Quarter 4 against the DUSP condition 1.9 domestic and EU standards and performance targets. In addition, the DUSP condition requires Royal Mail to provide quarterly results against the following standards which do not have specified targets. These are: The percentage of deliveries in the UK which are made by the latest delivery times. The percentage of collections in the UK which are made from post boxes and Post Office branches at or after the final advertised time of collection. USO priority services purchased by postage stamp and by meter: deemed delivered with an actual routing time of D+1 in each of the postcode areas HS, KW and ZE. The report also includes information on the quality of service given to access mail as required by condition USPA 8.1: The percentage of Downstream Access products which are delivered on the first working day after receipt by Royal Mail. The report includes, in accordance with condition CP 3.3.16 the quarterly statement on consumer complaints, covering complaints about a USO or regulated product made by a customer who does not have a contract for the product concerned. 2

Table 1 DUSP 1.10: Domestic and EU standards and performance targets Domestic & EU standards and performance targets Standard Target Quarter Quarter Cumulative Cumulative % % Accuracy % Accuracy USO 1st Class 93.0 88.7 +/- 0.3 91.6 +/- 0.1 USO 2nd Class 98.5 97.3 +/- 0.2 98.4 +/- 0.1 Special Delivery 1 99.0 97.1 98.1 Postcode Area Target % (Delivered) 2 91.5 (in 118/118) 21 of 118 71 of 118 Percentage Of Collection Points Served Daily 3 118/118) 99.90 97.89 99.39 Percentage Of Delivery Routes Completed Daily 99.90 96.66 98.88 Percentage Of Items Deemed Correctly Delivered 4 99.50 99.74 +/- 0.13 99.74 +/- 0.07 USO Outgoing EU Services D+3 5 85.0 85.6 +/- 2.4 85.1 +/- 1.1 Percentage of Deliveries by Latest Delivery Time - 99.0 (Urban) 98.8 (Urban) 99.7 (Rural) 99.8 (Rural) Percentage of Collections At or After Final Advertised Time 6-97.3 98.9 Target Based on full-year cumulative performance, excluding the defined Christmas period. Accuracy Denotes the range within which we can be 95% confident the true Quality of Service lies. For a measured Quality of Service performance of 93.0% and an accuracy of +/- 0.2%, the range would be from 92.8% to 93.2%. 1 Special Delivery is for all Special Delivery Guaranteed by 1PM items. The regulatory target is for Special Delivery Guaranteed by 1PM other than when sold to users having an account with Royal Mail buying the service using their account. The Royal Mail measurement system is unable to separate performance for account and non-account customers in this way. Special Delivery performance is measured using live mail items, not a sample survey and a confidence limit does not apply. 2 The postcode area delivered target is based on 1 st Class Stamped and Metered performance only and the performance for each postcode is shown in table 2. 3 Performance is based on collections from post boxes and Post Office branches only. 4 The Correctly Delivered Mail survey measures all items delivered by Royal Mail and not only USO items. 5 Results are calculated by the International Postal Corporation (IPC), based on the UNEX measurement data. They cover the flows between the UK and the other 27 EU member states. Results for the Christmas period are not included in the Royal Mail reported figures and are therefore not comparable to the UNEX results published annually by IPC on behalf of its European members. 6 Performance is based on collections from post boxes and Post Office branches only. 3

Table 2 DUSP 1.10: First Class Stamped and Metered PCA Delivered Performance Postcode Area Q1 C/L Q2 C/L Q3 C/L Q4 C/L Cumulative C/L AB Aberdeen 94.1 +/- 1.8 90.8 +/- 2.3 87.5 +/- 2.8 87.7 +/- 2.6 90.3 +/- 1.2 AL St Albans 95.2 +/- 1.7 95.4 +/- 1.7 93.9 +/- 2.0 90.1 +/- 2.4 93.7 +/- 1.0 B Birmingham 93.0 +/- 1.3 93.0 +/- 1.3 92.6 +/- 1.6 87.9 +/- 1.8 91.6 +/- 0.8 BA Bath 94.8 +/- 1.8 91.8 +/- 2.1 92.9 +/- 2.3 88.6 +/- 2.6 92.0 +/- 1.1 BB Blackburn & Burnley 93.9 +/- 1.9 95.1 +/- 1.7 92.8 +/- 2.4 88.5 +/- 2.5 92.7 +/- 1.1 BD Bradford 96.2 +/- 1.5 93.3 +/- 2.0 93.1 +/- 2.1 91.3 +/- 2.2 93.6 +/- 1.0 BH Bournemouth 90.4 +/- 2.2 92.1 +/- 2.0 90.4 +/- 2.4 85.7 +/- 2.7 89.8 +/- 1.2 BL Bolton 94.0 +/- 1.8 94.2 +/- 1.8 91.1 +/- 2.5 92.2 +/- 2.0 92.9 +/- 1.0 BN Brighton 92.4 +/- 1.7 92.6 +/- 1.7 92.8 +/- 1.9 88.5 +/- 2.1 91.6 +/- 0.9 BR Bromley 93.9 +/- 1.9 91.4 +/- 2.2 88.9 +/- 2.6 84.0 +/- 2.9 89.8 +/- 1.2 BS Bristol 93.3 +/- 1.5 90.5 +/- 1.7 94.0 +/- 1.5 90.0 +/- 1.8 91.9 +/- 0.8 BT Northern Ireland 91.4 +/- 1.7 88.5 +/- 1.8 88.6 +/- 2.1 86.4 +/- 2.0 88.8 +/- 0.9 CA Carlisle 95.5 +/- 1.6 96.5 +/- 1.4 94.5 +/- 2.0 91.3 +/- 2.1 94.5 +/- 0.9 CB Cambridge 93.7 +/- 2.0 91.5 +/- 2.2 93.2 +/- 2.3 91.1 +/- 2.3 92.3 +/- 1.1 CF Cardiff 94.3 +/- 1.4 95.1 +/- 1.3 94.7 +/- 1.5 88.2 +/- 2.0 93.1 +/- 0.8 CH Chester & Deeside 93.7 +/- 1.7 93.6 +/- 1.7 93.7 +/- 1.9 92.4 +/- 1.8 93.3 +/- 0.9 CM Chelmsford 93.4 +/- 1.7 91.0 +/- 2.0 89.8 +/- 2.4 83.0 +/- 2.7 89.5 +/- 1.1 CO Colchester 93.5 +/- 2.0 91.5 +/- 2.2 91.4 +/- 2.5 85.8 +/- 2.8 90.6 +/- 1.2 CR Croydon 91.9 +/- 2.2 89.4 +/- 2.5 93.3 +/- 2.2 90.3 +/- 2.3 91.1 +/- 1.2 CT Canterbury 92.9 +/- 2.1 91.7 +/- 2.1 91.7 +/- 2.4 87.0 +/- 2.6 90.8 +/- 1.1 CV Coventry & Warwickshire 93.8 +/- 1.7 92.6 +/- 1.8 89.7 +/- 2.2 89.9 +/- 2.1 91.5 +/- 1.0 CW Crewe 92.7 +/- 2.1 91.9 +/- 2.2 91.6 +/- 2.5 91.7 +/- 2.1 92.0 +/- 1.1 DA Dartford 92.2 +/- 2.2 93.7 +/- 1.9 88.9 +/- 2.7 85.9 +/- 2.7 90.3 +/- 1.2 DD Dundee 95.0 +/- 1.7 94.7 +/- 1.8 91.5 +/- 2.7 85.6 +/- 2.8 91.9 +/- 1.1 DE Derby 92.3 +/- 1.9 93.0 +/- 1.8 92.4 +/- 2.2 91.4 +/- 2.0 92.3 +/- 1.0 DG Dumfries 92.7 +/- 2.4 92.2 +/- 2.4 94.2 +/- 2.2 89.1 +/- 2.5 91.9 +/- 1.2 DH Durham 95.3 +/- 1.8 91.6 +/- 2.3 90.8 +/- 2.7 88.9 +/- 2.5 91.8 +/- 1.2 = Areas below full-year target = Areas meeting or exceeding full-year target = Exempted from postcode area targets 4

Table 2 (Continued) DUSP 1.10: First Class Stamped and Metered PCA Delivered Performance Postcode Area Q1 C/L Q2 C/L Q3 C/L Q4 C/L Cumulative C/L DL Darlington 96.2 +/- 1.5 91.7 +/- 2.2 95.4 +/- 2.0 89.5 +/- 2.6 93.2 +/- 1.1 DN Doncaster 92.1 +/- 2.0 91.9 +/- 2.0 88.4 +/- 2.5 88.8 +/- 2.2 90.4 +/- 1.1 DT Dorchester 93.2 +/- 2.1 94.1 +/- 1.8 92.9 +/- 2.2 87.5 +/- 2.7 92.1 +/- 1.1 DY Dudley 93.0 +/- 2.1 94.7 +/- 1.8 92.2 +/- 2.5 89.1 +/- 2.5 92.3 +/- 1.1 E London East 92.6 +/- 1.8 91.2 +/- 2.1 92.2 +/- 2.2 88.8 +/- 2.1 91.1 +/- 1.0 EC City of London 96.3 +/- 1.7 91.5 +/- 2.5 93.5 +/- 2.6 93.7 +/- 2.3 93.8 +/- 1.1 EH Edinburgh 93.6 +/- 1.5 94.6 +/- 1.4 92.8 +/- 1.8 86.9 +/- 2.0 91.9 +/- 0.9 EN Enfield 93.8 +/- 2.0 92.8 +/- 2.2 90.3 +/- 2.8 85.8 +/- 2.9 90.7 +/- 1.2 EX Exeter 91.5 +/- 2.1 90.8 +/- 2.1 90.5 +/- 2.4 85.8 +/- 2.6 89.7 +/- 1.2 FK Falkirk 92.1 +/- 2.5 89.0 +/- 2.9 89.7 +/- 3.3 85.7 +/- 3.1 89.0 +/- 1.5 FY Fylde 93.2 +/- 2.1 95.5 +/- 1.7 93.8 +/- 2.6 93.7 +/- 1.9 94.1 +/- 1.0 G Glasgow 93.6 +/- 1.5 93.1 +/- 1.5 93.3 +/- 1.8 88.1 +/- 2.0 92.1 +/- 0.8 GL Gloucester 93.7 +/- 1.6 90.9 +/- 2.0 90.6 +/- 2.3 88.2 +/- 2.2 90.9 +/- 1.0 GU Guildford 94.1 +/- 1.5 92.9 +/- 1.5 93.4 +/- 1.6 91.1 +/- 1.7 92.9 +/- 0.8 HA Harrow 93.3 +/- 2.0 93.7 +/- 1.9 94.2 +/- 2.2 94.4 +/- 1.9 93.9 +/- 1.0 HD Huddersfield 94.6 +/- 1.9 92.5 +/- 2.1 92.2 +/- 2.5 89.0 +/- 2.6 92.1 +/- 1.1 HG Harrogate 93.6 +/- 2.1 91.4 +/- 2.2 92.7 +/- 2.5 91.1 +/- 2.4 92.1 +/- 1.2 HP Hemel Hempstead 94.8 +/- 1.7 94.2 +/- 1.8 93.2 +/- 2.2 92.2 +/- 2.0 93.7 +/- 1.0 HR Hereford 91.0 +/- 2.5 92.6 +/- 2.2 90.2 +/- 2.6 90.6 +/- 2.3 91.1 +/- 1.2 HS Hebrides 71.2 +/- 5.0 70.3 +/- 4.6 73.2 +/- 5.5 71.1 +/- 4.8 71.4 +/- 2.5 HU Hull 90.7 +/- 2.3 92.0 +/- 2.1 91.6 +/- 2.4 86.1 +/- 2.7 90.1 +/- 1.2 HX Halifax 94.3 +/- 2.1 92.3 +/- 2.4 92.1 +/- 2.6 87.6 +/- 2.7 91.4 +/- 1.3 IG Ilford 90.2 +/- 2.5 91.7 +/- 2.3 90.0 +/- 2.8 90.9 +/- 2.3 90.7 +/- 1.2 IP Ipswich 91.5 +/- 2.1 91.7 +/- 2.0 87.7 +/- 2.6 86.7 +/- 2.6 89.6 +/- 1.2 IV Inverness 90.1 +/- 2.4 87.2 +/- 2.6 87.6 +/- 2.9 88.2 +/- 2.4 88.3 +/- 1.3 KA Kilmarnock 91.9 +/- 2.4 91.8 +/- 2.2 93.6 +/- 2.2 88.5 +/- 2.5 91.4 +/- 1.2 KT Kingston upon Thames 94.5 +/- 1.6 92.7 +/- 1.8 92.7 +/- 2.0 93.3 +/- 1.7 93.3 +/- 0.9 = Areas below full-year target = Areas meeting or exceeding full-year target = Exempted from postcode area targets 5

Table 2 (Continued) DUSP 1.10: First Class Stamped and Metered PCA Delivered Performance Postcode Area Q1 C/L Q2 C/L Q3 C/L Q4 C/L Cumulative C/L KW Kirkwall 79.6 +/- 3.9 85.5 +/- 3.2 79.4 +/- 4.0 71.9 +/- 4.2 79.2 +/- 1.9 KY Kirkcaldy 93.3 +/- 2.0 92.1 +/- 2.2 92.8 +/- 2.6 89.8 +/- 2.7 92.1 +/- 1.2 L Liverpool 93.8 +/- 1.6 93.0 +/- 1.6 94.3 +/- 1.7 92.3 +/- 1.6 93.2 +/- 0.8 LA Lancaster 96.8 +/- 1.5 94.5 +/- 1.9 93.6 +/- 2.2 92.2 +/- 2.2 94.3 +/- 1.0 LD Llandrindod Wells 95.8 +/- 1.9 92.9 +/- 2.4 92.0 +/- 2.8 90.1 +/- 2.7 92.9 +/- 1.2 LE Leicester 94.2 +/- 1.5 90.7 +/- 1.7 87.0 +/- 2.3 86.5 +/- 2.1 89.9 +/- 0.9 LL North Wales 93.2 +/- 1.9 93.0 +/- 1.8 92.7 +/- 2.2 90.0 +/- 2.3 92.3 +/- 1.0 LN Lincoln 91.6 +/- 2.2 90.7 +/- 2.3 89.5 +/- 2.7 82.0 +/- 3.0 88.5 +/- 1.3 LS Leeds 95.4 +/- 1.3 95.2 +/- 1.3 94.9 +/- 1.5 92.5 +/- 1.6 94.5 +/- 0.7 LU Luton 91.7 +/- 2.1 94.7 +/- 1.7 92.9 +/- 2.4 89.7 +/- 2.4 92.3 +/- 1.1 M Manchester 91.2 +/- 1.7 93.3 +/- 1.4 91.2 +/- 1.8 92.2 +/- 1.5 92.0 +/- 0.8 ME Maidstone 92.6 +/- 1.9 92.4 +/- 1.9 93.4 +/- 2.0 86.3 +/- 2.5 91.2 +/- 1.0 MK Milton Keynes 93.7 +/- 1.8 91.2 +/- 2.0 89.8 +/- 2.4 86.7 +/- 2.4 90.4 +/- 1.1 ML Motherwell 92.7 +/- 2.3 93.2 +/- 2.2 90.8 +/- 2.8 87.2 +/- 2.8 91.0 +/- 1.3 N London N 93.7 +/- 1.5 93.0 +/- 1.6 91.9 +/- 2.0 91.2 +/- 1.8 92.5 +/- 0.9 NE Newcastle 95.4 +/- 1.3 93.3 +/- 1.5 93.4 +/- 1.7 90.6 +/- 1.8 93.2 +/- 0.8 NG Nottingham 93.4 +/- 1.5 94.2 +/- 1.3 92.8 +/- 1.7 89.3 +/- 1.9 92.5 +/- 0.8 NN Northamptonshire 92.7 +/- 1.8 91.8 +/- 1.9 83.0 +/- 2.8 85.3 +/- 2.4 88.4 +/- 1.1 NP Newport 94.2 +/- 1.9 93.0 +/- 2.0 92.9 +/- 2.5 89.0 +/- 2.4 92.2 +/- 1.1 NR Norwich 93.5 +/- 1.6 93.0 +/- 1.7 91.5 +/- 2.1 85.7 +/- 2.3 91.0 +/- 1.0 NW London NW 94.3 +/- 1.8 92.2 +/- 2.0 93.8 +/- 2.1 87.4 +/- 2.5 91.9 +/- 1.1 OL Oldham 93.3 +/- 2.1 91.4 +/- 2.4 91.4 +/- 2.6 90.2 +/- 2.5 91.7 +/- 1.2 OX Oxford 95.4 +/- 1.5 90.6 +/- 2.0 89.4 +/- 2.6 89.7 +/- 2.1 91.4 +/- 1.0 PA Paisley 95.2 +/- 1.8 93.0 +/- 2.2 92.8 +/- 2.8 85.2 +/- 2.9 91.7 +/- 1.2 PE Peterborough 94.3 +/- 1.4 93.9 +/- 1.5 93.7 +/- 1.7 89.7 +/- 1.9 92.9 +/- 0.8 PH Perth 91.7 +/- 2.4 95.2 +/- 1.8 90.2 +/- 2.9 85.0 +/- 2.7 90.6 +/- 1.3 PL Plymouth 95.9 +/- 1.4 94.8 +/- 1.7 91.9 +/- 2.3 89.7 +/- 2.3 93.2 +/- 1.0 = Areas below full-year target = Areas meeting or exceeding full-year target = Exempted from postcode area targets 6

Table 2 (Continued) DUSP 1.10: First Class Stamped and Metered PCA Delivered Performance Postcode Area Q1 C/L Q2 C/L Q3 C/L Q4 C/L Cumulative C/L PO Portsmouth 94.4 +/- 1.6 92.7 +/- 1.8 91.6 +/- 2.1 87.5 +/- 2.3 91.6 +/- 1.0 PR Preston 94.9 +/- 1.7 94.6 +/- 1.6 93.5 +/- 2.2 93.0 +/- 1.9 94.1 +/- 0.9 RG Reading 93.8 +/- 1.5 93.6 +/- 1.6 92.5 +/- 2.0 92.0 +/- 1.8 93.1 +/- 0.8 RH Redhill 92.6 +/- 1.9 92.9 +/- 1.8 94.3 +/- 1.7 93.1 +/- 1.7 93.2 +/- 0.9 RM Romford 92.1 +/- 2.2 89.5 +/- 2.4 93.0 +/- 2.4 85.1 +/- 2.9 89.8 +/- 1.3 S Sheffield 93.2 +/- 1.4 93.1 +/- 1.4 92.5 +/- 1.7 87.8 +/- 1.8 91.6 +/- 0.8 SA Swansea 92.9 +/- 1.6 93.9 +/- 1.5 91.5 +/- 2.0 90.4 +/- 1.9 92.3 +/- 0.9 SE London SE 92.0 +/- 1.7 91.9 +/- 1.6 88.2 +/- 2.2 88.0 +/- 2.1 90.2 +/- 0.9 SG Stevenage 94.2 +/- 1.9 93.3 +/- 2.0 90.4 +/- 2.8 89.1 +/- 2.5 91.9 +/- 1.1 SK Stockport 93.6 +/- 1.8 93.4 +/- 1.8 93.9 +/- 2.0 90.2 +/- 2.2 92.8 +/- 1.0 SL Slough 93.8 +/- 2.1 93.7 +/- 2.0 93.4 +/- 2.6 91.0 +/- 2.4 92.9 +/- 1.1 SM Sutton 90.5 +/- 2.8 91.6 +/- 2.6 92.6 +/- 2.5 90.8 +/- 2.4 91.3 +/- 1.3 SN Swindon 94.0 +/- 1.8 93.0 +/- 1.9 95.2 +/- 1.8 88.6 +/- 2.3 92.6 +/- 1.0 SO Southampton 91.2 +/- 1.9 93.4 +/- 1.7 93.0 +/- 2.0 86.2 +/- 2.4 90.9 +/- 1.0 SP Salisbury 90.4 +/- 2.7 91.5 +/- 2.4 92.5 +/- 2.6 86.1 +/- 2.8 90.0 +/- 1.3 SR Sunderland 96.0 +/- 1.8 94.2 +/- 2.0 90.4 +/- 2.9 85.6 +/- 2.9 91.5 +/- 1.2 SS Southend-on-Sea 92.2 +/- 2.2 91.2 +/- 2.3 90.3 +/- 2.8 84.9 +/- 3.0 89.7 +/- 1.3 ST Stoke-on-Trent 92.2 +/- 2.1 91.6 +/- 2.1 90.0 +/- 2.5 87.5 +/- 2.5 90.4 +/- 1.1 SW London SW 93.3 +/- 1.4 91.9 +/- 1.6 89.1 +/- 2.1 85.3 +/- 2.2 90.2 +/- 0.9 SY Shrewsbury 91.1 +/- 2.3 90.6 +/- 2.4 89.5 +/- 2.8 86.0 +/- 2.6 89.3 +/- 1.3 TA Taunton 92.3 +/- 2.0 89.7 +/- 2.3 88.8 +/- 2.7 88.9 +/- 2.3 90.0 +/- 1.2 TD Borders 88.8 +/- 2.9 91.6 +/- 2.3 91.2 +/- 3.0 86.2 +/- 3.1 89.5 +/- 1.4 TF Telford 94.8 +/- 1.8 94.4 +/- 1.9 90.1 +/- 2.6 90.2 +/- 2.3 92.5 +/- 1.1 TN Tonbridge 94.2 +/- 1.5 90.7 +/- 1.9 91.4 +/- 2.2 89.1 +/- 2.1 91.5 +/- 1.0 TQ Torquay 92.6 +/- 2.2 91.7 +/- 2.1 90.2 +/- 2.7 85.9 +/- 2.8 90.2 +/- 1.2 TR Truro 93.2 +/- 2.1 93.4 +/- 2.0 92.3 +/- 2.5 88.6 +/- 2.7 92.0 +/- 1.2 TS Teesside 94.1 +/- 1.8 91.0 +/- 2.2 95.0 +/- 1.9 85.4 +/- 2.7 91.2 +/- 1.1 = Areas below full-year target = Areas meeting or exceeding full-year target = Exempted from postcode area targets 7

Table 2 (Continued) DUSP 1.10: First Class Stamped and Metered PCA Delivered Performance Postcode Area Q1 C/L Q2 C/L Q3 C/L Q4 C/L Cumulative C/L TW Twickenham 96.3 +/- 1.5 92.7 +/- 2.0 95.1 +/- 1.9 94.5 +/- 1.7 94.7 +/- 0.9 UB Uxbridge 94.3 +/- 1.9 92.8 +/- 2.0 93.3 +/- 2.1 91.2 +/- 2.4 92.9 +/- 1.1 W London West 91.2 +/- 1.9 91.7 +/- 1.8 93.4 +/- 2.0 91.7 +/- 1.8 91.9 +/- 0.9 WA Warrington 93.9 +/- 1.7 93.8 +/- 1.8 90.5 +/- 2.3 93.3 +/- 1.7 93.0 +/- 0.9 WC London West Central 94.3 +/- 2.2 94.4 +/- 2.2 91.4 +/- 3.0 94.2 +/- 2.3 93.7 +/- 1.2 WD Watford 92.4 +/- 2.2 87.7 +/- 2.8 88.9 +/- 3.1 89.2 +/- 2.7 89.7 +/- 1.3 WF Wakefield 94.5 +/- 1.9 90.6 +/- 2.3 92.8 +/- 2.4 90.7 +/- 2.3 92.1 +/- 1.1 WN Wigan 92.3 +/- 2.2 90.6 +/- 2.3 87.0 +/- 2.9 91.8 +/- 2.2 90.5 +/- 1.2 WR Worcester 91.4 +/- 2.3 91.5 +/- 2.4 92.5 +/- 2.5 85.3 +/- 2.9 90.1 +/- 1.3 WS Walsall 93.8 +/- 1.9 93.8 +/- 1.9 92.2 +/- 2.5 90.2 +/- 2.4 92.6 +/- 1.1 WV Wolverhampton 93.9 +/- 1.9 93.1 +/- 2.0 90.9 +/- 2.7 89.6 +/- 2.6 92.1 +/- 1.1 YO York 95.3 +/- 1.5 93.7 +/- 1.9 94.7 +/- 1.9 93.0 +/- 2.0 94.2 +/- 0.9 ZE Lerwick 52.2 +/- 5.0 52.4 +/- 4.8 59.1 +/- 5.9 46.1 +/- 4.9 52.3 +/- 2.6 = Areas below full-year target = Areas meeting or exceeding full-year target = Exempted from postcode area targets 8

Table 3 USPA 8.1 Downstream Access Products Percentage Delivered on First Working Day After Receipt by Royal Mail National Result Quarterly Performance & Confidence Limit Cumulative Performance & Confidence Limit UK 91.4 +/- 0.6 93.9 +/- 0.3 9

Consumer Protection Condition 3.3.16: Consumer Complaints Category of Customer Complaint Complaints Received and Completed Complaints Received and Not Completed Recompense Received Loss 51,598 11,146 814,613 Other 28,034 3,518 293,452 Redirection 16,056 1,304 69,602 P739 Failure 15,400 1,657 3,080 Delay 15,372 2,651 111,002 Misdelivery 14,721 964 2,115 Delivery Procedure Errors 13,667 1,214 5,013 Redelivery Failure 10,017 1,142 2,507 Damage 8,365 1,520 86,359 Denial of Receipt 8,271 3,121 18,234 Part Loss 4,646 952 47,262 Grand Total 186,147 29,189 1,453,239 Note: This report includes complaints about a USO or regulated product made by a customer who does not have a contract for the product concerned. The Recompense Received figures include all payments made to relevant customers in accordance with the product terms and conditions, the compensation scheme for loss, damage and delay, and any goodwill payments made in respect of customer complaints received in the quarter. Royal Mail is required to record any expression of dissatisfaction as a complaint, including phone calls, letters, emails and online forms. This means we are obliged to record some matters as complaints even if Royal Mail is not at fault. 10