DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF A RADIO CONTROLLED AIR PLANE BY USING DELTA WING

Similar documents
Aero Club. Introduction to Flight

Aerodynamics Principles

Winnipeg Headingley Aero Modellers. Things About Airplanes.

ROAD MAP... D-1: Aerodynamics of 3-D Wings D-2: Boundary Layer and Viscous Effects D-3: XFLR (Aerodynamics Analysis Tool)

Related Careers: Aircraft Instrument Repairer Aircraft Designer Aircraft Engineer Aircraft Electronics Specialist Aircraft Mechanic Pilot US Military

Jet Propulsion. Lecture-17. Ujjwal K Saha, Ph. D. Department of Mechanical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati

WHAT IS GLIDER? A light engineless aircraft designed to glide after being towed aloft or launched from a catapult.

Effect of High-Lift Devices on Aircraft Wing

The Metric Glider. By Steven A. Bachmeyer. Aerospace Technology Education Series

Stability and Flight Controls

The effect of back spin on a table tennis ball moving in a viscous fluid.

CASE STUDY FOR USE WITH SECTION B

Detailed study 3.4 Topic Test Investigations: Flight

PRINCIPLES OF FLIGHT

AERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF NACA 0012 AIRFOIL SECTION AT DIFFERENT ANGLES OF ATTACK

Ottawa Remote Control Club Wings Program

II.E. Airplane Flight Controls

Computational Analysis of Cavity Effect over Aircraft Wing

Effect of Co-Flow Jet over an Airfoil: Numerical Approach

X-29 Canard Jet. A Simple Depron Foam Build.

CFD Study of Solid Wind Tunnel Wall Effects on Wing Characteristics

No Description Direction Source 1. Thrust

DEFINITIONS. Aerofoil

AERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF SPIN PHENOMENON FOR DELTA WING

A103 AERODYNAMIC PRINCIPLES

Aerodynamic Analysis of a Symmetric Aerofoil

Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Aerodynamics #2 AAE-451 Aircraft Design

Investigation on 3-D Wing of commercial Aeroplane with Aerofoil NACA 2415 Using CFD Fluent

It should be noted that the symmetrical airfoil at zero lift has no pitching moment about the aerodynamic center because the upper and

Welcome to Aerospace Engineering

Principles of glider flight

PASSIVE FLOW SEPARATION CONTROL BY STATIC EXTENDED TRAILING EDGE

The Fly Higher Tutorial IV

Reduction of Skin Friction Drag in Wings by Employing Riblets

INTERFERENCE EFFECT AND FLOW PATTERN OF FOUR BIPLANE CONFIGURATIONS USING NACA 0024 PROFILE

Aircraft Stability and Control Prof. A. K. Ghosh Department of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Technology-Kanpur. Lecture- 25 Revision

C-1: Aerodynamics of Airfoils 1 C-2: Aerodynamics of Airfoils 2 C-3: Panel Methods C-4: Thin Airfoil Theory

Induced Drag Reduction for Modern Aircraft without Increasing the Span of the Wing by Using Winglet

Lift for a Finite Wing. all real wings are finite in span (airfoils are considered as infinite in the span)

Aerodynamic Analysis of Blended Winglet for Low Speed Aircraft

The Academy of Model Aeronautics ALPHA: Potential Energy Background Information for the Teacher

Volume 2, Issue 5, May- 2015, Impact Factor: Structural Analysis of Formula One Racing Car

Flight Corridor. The speed-altitude band where flight sustained by aerodynamic forces is technically possible is called the flight corridor.

Flying Wings. By Henry Cole

Flight Control Systems Introduction

The subsonic compressibility effect is added by replacing. with

A Systematic Approach for Designing, Analyzing and Building a Model RC Plane

Measurement of Pressure. The aerofoil shape used in wing is to. Distribution and Lift for an Aerofoil. generate lift due to the difference

PRE-TEST Module 2 The Principles of Flight Units /60 points

DIRECCION DE PERSONAL AERONAUTICO DPTO. DE INSTRUCCION PREGUNTAS Y OPCIONES POR TEMA

V mca (and the conditions that affect it)

Improved Aerodynamic Characteristics of Aerofoil Shaped Fuselage than that of the Conventional Cylindrical Shaped Fuselage

AIRCRAFT PRIMARY CONTROLS A I R C R A F T G E N E R A L K N O W L E D G E

Aerodynamic Terms. Angle of attack is the angle between the relative wind and the wing chord line. [Figure 2-2] Leading edge. Upper camber.

STUDY OF VARIOUS NACA SERIES AEROFOIL SECTIONS AND WING CONTOUR GENERATION USING CATIA V5

Chapter 3: Aircraft Construction

ANALYSIS OF AERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF A SUPERCRITICAL AIRFOIL FOR LOW SPEED AIRCRAFT

Created by Glenn Gibson Air and Aerodynamics Flight Note Pack

CFD ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON USING ANSYS AND STAR-CCM+ OF MODEL AEROFOIL SELIG 1223

Instructions for Fun Foam Critter 4/25/2007 BP Hobbies LLC 140 Ethel Road W Suite J Piscataway NJ,

Fighter aircraft design. Aerospace Design Project G. Dimitriadis

AE Dept., KFUPM. Dr. Abdullah M. Al-Garni. Fuel Economy. Emissions Maximum Speed Acceleration Directional Stability Stability.

Homework Exercise to prepare for Class #2.

Building Instructions ME 163 B 1a M 1:5 Turbine

THEORY OF WINGS AND WIND TUNNEL TESTING OF A NACA 2415 AIRFOIL. By Mehrdad Ghods

CHAPTER 1 - PRINCIPLES OF FLIGHT

Aerodynamics. A study guide on aerodynamics for the Piper Archer

BASIC AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES

PILOT S HANDBOOK of Aeronautical Knowledge AC61-23C

XI.B. Power-On Stalls

AE2610 Introduction to Experimental Methods in Aerospace AERODYNAMIC FORCES ON A WING IN A SUBSONIC WIND TUNNEL

Experimental and Theoretical Investigation for the Improvement of the Aerodynamic Characteristic of NACA 0012 airfoil

AEROSPACE MICRO-LESSON

Aerodynamics of Winglet: A Computational Fluid Dynamics Study Using Fluent

Lesson: Airspeed Control

Lesson: Pitch Trim. Materials / Equipment Publications o Flight Training Manual for Gliders (Holtz) Lesson 4.4 Using the Trim Control.

C-130 Reduction in Directional Stability at Low Dynamic Pressure and High Power Settings

Low Speed Wind Tunnel Wing Performance

Exploration Series. AIRPLANE Interactive Physics Simulation Page 01

LEVEL FOUR AVIATION EVALUATION PRACTICE TEST

External Tank- Drag Reduction Methods and Flow Analysis

DIRECCION DE PERSONAL AERONAUTICO DPTO. DE INSTRUCCION PREGUNTAS Y OPCIONES POR TEMA

Chapter 5 Wing design - selection of wing parameters - 4 Lecture 22 Topics

Basic Fluid Mechanics

CHAPTER 9 PROPELLERS

LAPL(A)/PPL(A) question bank FCL.215, FCL.120 Rev PRINCIPLES OF FLIGHT 080

UNCORRECTED PAGE PROOFS

Airframes. Chapter 5: Wings & Tailplane

Numerical Analysis of Wings for UAV based on High-Lift Airfoils

Aircraft Stability and Control Prof. A.K.Ghosh Department of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Technology-Kanpur. Lecture-01 Introduction

First Flight Glossary

Study on the Shock Formation over Transonic Aerofoil

VIII.A. Straight and Level Flight

POWERED FLIGHT HOVERING FLIGHT

Chapter 5 Wing design - selection of wing parameters - 3 Lecture 21 Topics

AIRCRAFT STRUCTURAL DESIGN & ANALYSIS K. RAMAJEYATHILAGAM

XI.C. Power-Off Stalls

VIII.A. Straight and Level Flight

What happens to a fluid (water or air) when it moves from entering a wide opening to entering a narrow opening?

CFD Analysis ofwind Turbine Airfoil at Various Angles of Attack

Transcription:

Proceedings of the International Conference on Mechanical Engineering and Renewable Energy 2015 (ICMERE2015) 26 29 November, 2015, Chittagong, Bangladesh ICMERE2015-PI-231 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF A RADIO CONTROLLED AIR PLANE BY USING DELTA WING Md. Sojib Kaisar 1,*, Nizam Uddin 2 and Mohammad Mashud 3 1-3 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Khulna University of Engineering & Technology, Khulna-9203, Bangladesh 1,* Sojibkaiserme31@gmail.com, 2 engrnizam02@gmail.com, 3 mdmashud@yahoo.com Abstract- The quintessence of the intense theory models of the aeronautical study could be apprehended with the hands-on experience on the real-time construction of flights or similar aerodynamic structures. The project was launched to design and construction of a delta wing RC controlled airplane. The delta wing is commonly used for the high speed airplane. The delta wing has a large enough angle of rearward sweep and for this reason the wing s leading edge will not contact the shockwave boundary formed at the nose of the fuselage as the speed of the aircraft approaches and exceeds transonic to supersonic speed. The delta plan form has a large wing area than a traditional wings that s why it produces a useful lift with very low wing per unit loading and permitting high maneuverability in the airframe. Because of its advantage a delta wing shape airplane has been modeled and construct in this project. The main concern of this project is construct a plane model and control it by Radio Control system. Keywords: Template, Double column, Times New Roman, References and Nomenclature (maximum 5 key words) 1. INTRODUCTION Aeronautics is the study of the science of flight. RC planes are small model radio-controlled airplanes that using electric motor, gas powered IC engines or small model jet engines. The RC Airplanes are flown remotely with the help of a transmitter with joysticks that can be used to fly the aircraft and perform different maneuvers. The transmitter comes also with a receiver which is installed inside the model RC Airplanes which receives the commands send by the transmitter and controls servos. The servos are small motors which are mechanically linked to the control surfaces e.g. ailerons for roll control, elevator for pitch control and rudder for yaw control. The servos moves the control rods (which are small rods that connect the servo to different flight control e.g. to elevator etc.) which in turn moves the control surface be it elevator, flaps, aileron or rudder. An RC Airplane can be controlled in flight by using the transmitter from where one can control pitch, yaw and roll of one s RC Airplane and one can also control the throttle settings. The receiver which accepts the transmitter signal and the servos attached to it are run on rechargeable batteries. Most popular rechargeable batteries for RC Airplanes us include Ni-Cd (Nickel Cadmium) and Li-Po (lithium-polymer). Lithium polymer lasts longer and more powerful than there Ni-Cd counterparts but a bit more expensive. Generally RC planes are consist of straight type wing which is easy to make and control. For the delta shape wing, it gives high speed flight as well as easy design and manufacturing, Strength. As the angle of attack increases, the leading edge of the wing generates a vortex which energizes the flow and giving delta a very high stall angle. In delta wing the air flow is divided into two components on the leading edge. One component is perpendicular to the leading edge and the other component is parallel to this edge. Only the first component is essential in lift generating, while the parallel component produces drag force. Therefore in these wings lift to drag ratio is lower than other wings. [2] 2. BACKGROUND Between 1529 and 1556 Conrad has wrote a book in which he described rocket technology, involving the combination of fireworks and weapons technologies. This manuscript was rediscovered in 1961, in the Sibiu public records (Sibiu public records Varia II 374). His work dealt with the theory of motion of multi-stage rockets, different fuel mixtures using liquid fuel, and also introduced delta shaped stabilizers. As the manuscript was discovered only in 1961 until recently the conception of such stabilizers and their name had been suggested in the 17th century by the polish-lithuanian military engineer Kazimierz Siemienowicz. The development of the swept and delta wing plan form enabled practical attainment of the high speeds promised by the invention of the turbojet engine and the solid-and-liquid-fueled rocket. Refining the swept and delta plan forms from theoretical constructs to practical realities involved many challenges and problems

requiring creative analysis and study by NACA and NASA researchers. The high speed swept wing first appeared in the mid -1930s and like most elements in aircraft design, was European by birth. The first practical uses of delta wing came in the form of so called Tailless delta i.e. without the horizontal tail plane. In fact the design were at the same time also the first flying wings. It could be argued if 1924 Cheranovsky designs, having one of a kind parabolic plan form, fit the category of delta wings. Nevertheless, a triangular wing was pioneered especially by Alexander Lippisch in Germany. He was first to fly tailless delta aircraft in 1931 followed by four improved designs. None of these was easy in handling at slow speeds, and none new saw widespread service. Pure delta- wing fell out of favor somewhat due to their undesirable characteristics notably flow separation at high angles of attack (swept wings have similar problems), and high drag at low altitudes. This limited them primarily to high-speed, high-altitude interceptor roles. Tailed delta adds a conventional tail plane (with horizontal tail surfaces), to improve handling. Cropped delta is the type which has cut off tip, this helps avoid tip drag at high angles of attack. In another variant known variously as Compound delta, double delta or Cranked arrow. The inner part of the wing has a very high sweepback, while the outer part has less sweepback, to create the high-lift vortex in a more controlled fashion, reduce the drag and thereby allow for landing the delta at acceptably slow speed. [3] Fig.2: Various parts of Radio Controlled plane 3. BASIC AERODYNAMICS The air flow over an airfoil and considering the stream tube A flows over the top surface, and stream tube B flows over the bottom surface. Both stream tubes originate in the free stream ahead of the airfoil. As stream tube A flows toward the airfoil, it senses the upper portion of the airfoil as an obstruction, and stream tube A must move out of the way of this obstruction. In so doing, stream tube A is squashed to a smaller cross-sectional area as it flows over the nose of the airfoil. [1] Fig.1: Various type of Delta Wings. Generally RC plane consists of the following parts and wing shape generally straight type. RC Electric Motors Fuselage Wings Engine Cowl Propeller Horizontal Tail Vertical Tail Ailerons Flaps Elevators Rudder Landing Gear Fig.3: Flow velocity over an airfoil shape. In turn, because of mass continuity (ρav=constant), the velocity of the flow in the stream tube must increase in the region where the stream tube is being squashed. Hence the higher velocity of the upper surface of airfoil so from the Bernoulli s equation: (1) p + 1 2 ρv2 = constant... (1) Clearly shows that where the velocity increases, the static pressure decreases. This trend is the same for both compressible and incompressible flow. That s how lifting of wing produces. [2] Another alternative explanation also describe the same phenomena. The wing deflects the airflow such that the mean velocity vector behind the wing is canted slightly downward. Hence the wing imparts a downward component of momentum to the air; that is, the wing exerts a force on the air, pushing the flow downward. [1]

Fig.4: Relation of lift to the time rate of change of momentum of the airflow. From the Newton s third law, the equal and opposite reaction produces a lift. However this explanation really involves the effect of lift, and not the cause. In reality, the air pressure on the surface is pushing on the surface, hence creating lift in the upward direction. As a result of equal and opposite principle, the airfoil, surface pushes on the air, imparting a downward force on the air, whish deflects the velocity downward. Hence the net rate of change of downward momentum created in the airflow because of the presence of the wing can thought of as an effect due to the surface pressure distribution; the pressure distribution by itself is the fundamental cause of lift. The preceding explanation of the generation of lift applies also to flat plates as well as curved airfoil shape. [1] 3.1 Effect of swept wing on critical Mach number Consider the plan view of a straight wing. Assume this wing has an airfoil cross section with a critical Mach number M cr = 0.7. (Remember from Sec. 5.10 that for M slightly above M cr, there is a large increase in drag. Hence, it is desirable to increase M cr as much as possible in high-speed subsonic airplane design.) Now assume that we sweep the wing back through an angle of, say, 30, as shown in Figure. The airfoil, which still has a value of M cr = 0.7, now "sees" essentially only the component of the flow normal to the leading edge of the wing; i.e., the aerodynamic properties of the local section of the swept wing are governed mainly by the flow normal to the leading edge. Hence, if M is the free stream Mach number, the airfoil in Figure is seeing effectively a smaller Mach number, M cos 30. As a result, the actual free stream Mach number can be increased above 0.7 before critical phenomena on the airfoil are encountered. In fact, we could expect that the critical Mach number for the swept wing itself would be as high as 0.7/cos 30 = 0.808. This means that the large increase in drag would be delayed to M much larger than M cr for the airfoil, something much larger than 0.7, and maybe even as high as 0.808. Therefore, we see the main function of a swept wing. By sweeping the wings of subsonic aircraft, drag divergence is delayed to higher Mach numbers. [1] Fig.5: Effect of swept wing on critical Mach number. In real life, the flow over the swept wing is a fairly complex three-dimensional flow, and to say that the airfoil sees only the component normal to the leading edge is a sweeping simplification. However, it leads to a good rule of thumb. If Q is the sweep angle, the actual critical Mach number for the swept wing is bracketed by: M cr for airfoil < actual M cr for swept wing< M cr for airfoil cosω 4. AIRPLANE DESIGN A CAD model of RC airplane is designed in SolidWorks. The following Model is a rendered model of Airplane. Fig 6: CAD model of delta wing airplane 4.1 Dimension layout: The main delta plan form dimensions are shown in bellow: 4.2 Simulation of flight: The flight simulation gives a good perspective meshing and fluid flow around the wing. In figure 7 shows the pressure distribution around the delta wings. The aerodynamic forces are due to positive and negative pressure gradients that are shown in pressure contours. In figure 8 shows that the delta wing pulls the stream line toward and lessen the mean of pressure under wing. However this will pushes the flow stream and increases the mean pressure on the wing. If the pressure difference decreases the lift will also be decreases.

49.25 ᵒ Fig 7: Delta plan form dimensions in inches. Fig 8 a: Pressure at upper surface of the wing. The lower surface pressure distribution shows higher pressure on lower portion of the wing. So lift will be generating. Fig 8 b: Pressure at lower surface of the wing. 4.4 Design parameter The shape of the wing is semi airfoil shape like it has a round leading edge but then it becomes flat shape. The first step in plane designing is to determine wing area. This portions plays an important role in payload endurance threshold. On the other hand wing must cover all parts of the air craft. According to the model weight, wing span and loading value are selected. The wing area can be calculated using equation (2) b = AR S (2) Here b is the wing span, AR is the aspect ratio and S is the wing area. Fling wings do not have conventional vertical and horizontal tail. In order to secure the stability requirements the wing has backward sweep, negative twist, and dihedral. To compensate longitudinal stability reflex sections are used. Elevators are used to this end. Also to increase roll and yaw stability two winglets are added to the wing s middle sections. This wing shape selection affects all other behavior of plane. Normally, the RC Airplane center of gravity or cg of the aircraft is to be located at 25% or 0.25c (of the mean aerodynamic chord). For the RC airplane, a vertical line is marked on the mean aerodynamic chord. At 25% or 0.25c of the mean aerodynamic chord, a horizontal line is marked on the wing. At the center point of the joint of two wings a straight vertical line is marked. The two lines will intersect each other at a point. That point is the reference cg point. An RC Airplane can be either nose heavy or tail heavy. Now the reference cg point is obtained. Then the airplane is checked if the cg of airplane is at the reference cg point or is it nose heavy or tail heavy. To do this, two people are required. One person stands on each side of the wing. Wing is lifted with a single finger (don't lift up/touch any other part of the aircraft during this check) along the reference vertical line which passes through the reference cg point. If the airplane is nose heavy or tail heavy it will automatically move in either direction. If airplane not at the cg point add ballast either to the nose or tail until the cg point is reached. 5. CONSTRUCTION Necessary equipment s: Depron foam Brushless DC motor Electronic Speed Controller (ESC) Servo motor Transmitter Receiver Pushrod Hot glue Li-Po battery The Depron board was used for the construction of the airplane body. First the CAD model was drawn in SolidWorks software and considering the same scale of designed model in CAD layout the Depron board was cut into desired shape for making wing, radar, elevator and fuselage. Then the full body was assembled and full airframe was constructed. In the following figure constructed body has been shown: 5.1. Electronic parts setup The main concern of the electric circuit is to rotate the propeller. The propeller (8*4.5) is connected with the BLDC motor. The motor is also connected with the ESC (Electronic Speed Controller) which will take power from Lithium-polymer battery and give a DC voltage to control the BLDC motor. The 500 mah Battery will provide maximum current of (.5 Amp. Hour*20 C* 3 Cell) 30 Ampere. The maximum working condition of ESC under 30A. So, it is reliable. Each servo is contained a pushrod which is connected to the control surface. So, two servo is connected to the Receiver from which it will get radio frequency signal from the transmitter. A

receiver will connect two servos and the ESC. Operator can supply frequency signal to the receiver through transmitter, than the frequency signal will convert to desired electronic signal for operating the aircraft. The circuit setup was showed in figure Fig 9: Full constructed airframe 6. CALCULATION & PARTS RATING Wing area, S= 235.4 in 2 Aspect ratio (AR) = 2.74 Total weight of the model = 300 grams Motor power=245 watt Propeller size= 8 inches Propeller pitch = 4.5 inches Battery = 500 mah 20C Li-Po Maximum speed produced by motor = 15540 rpm Theoretical maximum velocity can be produced by propeller =29.6 m/s 7. TESTING The model having low weight and the transmitter and receiver is employed to the airplane. The transmitter works well and different control surfaces are checked by transmitting the signal. Before flight the above features should be checked. Several tests has been conducted. At first time it does not work so well because of misbalancing of landing gear. But after balancing with straight wires, it flies. Only some vertical distance has been covered during flight because of safety of the model since the model having light weight and the range of the transmitter. 8. TESTING RESULTS Test results are as follows: Model showed good maneuverability and acceptable stability. Maximum speed was about 15 m/s The flying time was about 3 minutes. The response time is not so good but better transmitter and receiver can minimize the problem. Since the airframe is made of hand cut so making a uniform wing is little bit tough work. For this project total five model was constructed for better performance. But uniform cutting process can minimize the problem. Fig 10: Circuit diagram of electronic connection. 9. ACKOWLEDGEMENT My sincere acknowledgments to Dr. Mohammad Mashud, Professor of the Department of Mechanical Engineering of Khulna University of Engineering & Technology (KUET) for his support and guidance. 10. REFERENCES [1]. Anderson Jr, John, Introduction to flight, Fifth edition, Mc Graw-Hill International Editions, Aerospace Science Series. [2] R.H. Barnard, D.R. Philpott, Aircraft flight, Pearson Education, 2003. [3] Wohlfahrt, Karl; Nickel, Michael (1990). Schwanzlose flugzeuge, Ihre auslegung und ihre eigenschaften [Tailless aircraft: their design & properties] (in German).Basel: Birkhauser. pp. 577 78. ISBN 3-7643-2502-X. Retrieved 13 February 2011. Fig 11: Full construction after electronic connection

11. NOMENCLATURE Symbol Meaning Units M Mach number of free Dimensionl stream air ess M cr ρ V p b S AR Critical Mach number Density Velocity pressure Wing span length Wing area Aspect ratio Dimensionl ess kg/m 3 m/s Pa m m 2 Dimensionl ess