Implementing a Successful Deer Management Program. Kip Adams Certified Wildlife Biologist Dir. of Ed. & Outreach Quality Deer Management Association

Similar documents
Full summaries of all proposed rule changes, including DMU boundary descriptions, are included in the additional background material.

Quality Deer Management and Prescribed Fire Natural Partners in Wildlife and Habitat Conservation

Deer Management Unit 127

Biologist s Answer: What are your goals? Deer Management. Define goals, objectives. Manager s Question: Should I cull or shoot spikes?

ALTERNATIVE DEER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR GAME MANAGEMENT UNITS. 12A, 12B, 13A, 13B, 16A, 45A, 45B, 45C, and White-tailed Deer Units

DMU 005 Antrim County Deer Management Unit

Deer Management Unit 122

DEER HUNT RESULTS ON ALABAMA WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREAS ANNUAL REPORT, CHRISTOPHER W. COOK STUDY LEADER MAY, 2006

Making Sense of Selective Buck Harvest

ARE WHITE-TAILED DEER VERMIN?

DMU 024 Emmet County Deer Management Unit

LEAPS BOUNDS. Growing up hunting as a kid in New Hampshire, I didn t. by Dan Bergeron

New Changes to the Managed Lands Deer Program (MLDP)

2010 Zone 3 Deer Season Recommendations

5/DMU 069 Otsego County Deer Management Unit

Deer Management Unit 152

Recommendations for Pennsylvania's Deer Management Program and The 2010 Deer Hunting Season

IN PROGRESS BIG GAME HARVEST REPORTS FISH AND WILDLIFE BRANCH Energy and Resource Development

White-tailed Deer Age Report from the Deer Harvest

Deer Management in Maryland. Brian Eyler Deer Project Leader Maryland DNR

AN ASSESSMENT OF NEW JERSEY DEER HUNTER OPINION ON EXPANDING ANTLER POINT RESTRICTION (APR) REGULATIONS IN DEER MANAGEMENT ZONES 28, 30, 31, 34 AND 47

Cariboo-Chilcotin (Region 5) Mule Deer: Frequently Asked Questions

DMU 072 Roscommon County Deer Management Unit

Introduction to Pennsylvania s Deer Management Program. Christopher S. Rosenberry Deer and Elk Section Bureau of Wildlife Management

FISH AND WILDLIFE BRANCH NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT

DMU 006 Arenac County Deer Management Unit

Deer Management Unit 252

DMU 056 Midland County Deer Management Unit

DMU 043 Lake County Deer Management Unit

make people aware of the department s actions for improving the deer population monitoring system,

Management History of the Edwards Plateau

DMU 038 Jackson County

Deer Management Unit 249

Deer Management Unit 255

DMU 065 Ogemaw County Deer Management Unit

DMU 361 Fremont Deer Management Unit Newaygo, Oceana, N. Muskegon Counties

Archery Gun Muzzleloader Total Bull Cow Bull Cow Bull Cow Bull Cow

DMU 047 Livingston County Deer Management Unit

Developing Successful. Quality Deer Management Cooperatives

DMU 008 Barry County Deer Management Unit

PREDATOR CONTROL AND DEER MANAGEMENT: AN EAST TEXAS PERSPECTIVE

TRINIDAD RANCH WILDLIFE REGULATIONS

Deer Management Unit 349

DMU 419 Clinton, Eaton, Ingham, Ionia, and Shiawassee Counties

Deer Season Report

Central Hills Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G9 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results

Thumb Area Branch QDMA Newsletter

021 Deer Management Unit

DMU 452 Northern Multi-County Deer Management Unit

Evolution. of a Small Property. By Jim Jenzano

RANCHING Wildlife. Texas White-Tailed Deer 2017 Hunting Forecast

CHARLES H. WILLEY PHOTO. 8 November/December 2006 WILDLIFE JOURNAL

Northwest Parkland-Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G7 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results

DMU 057 Missaukee County Deer Management Unit

2019 Big Game Tag Application Seminar. Nevada Department of Wildlife

DMU 082 Wayne County Deer Management Unit

DMU 332 Huron, Sanilac and Tuscola Counties Deer Management Unit

2017 LATE WINTER CLASSIFICATION OF NORTHERN YELLOWSTONE ELK

Kansas Deer Report Seasons

Mule Deer. Dennis D. Austin. Published by Utah State University Press. For additional information about this book

DMU 073 Saginaw County Deer Management Unit

DMU 487 Northern Multi-County Deer Management Unit

White-Tailed Deer Management FAQ

contents 2004 Big Game Statistics

Mule deer in the Boundary Region: Proposed research and discussion

NEW YORK STATE WHITETAIL MANAGEMENT COALITION, INC. PO Box 191,Grahamsville, New York

Black Bear Quota Recommendations CR 17-13

Peace Region Wildlife Regulations Proposed Changes for Comment ( )

A Hunter's ~uide to Aging and. judging Live white-tailed Deer in the southeast

Michigan Predator-Prey Project Phase 1 Preliminary Results and Management Recommendations. Study Background

Deer Census - How to Use It to Calculate Harvest

DMU 053 Mason County Deer Management Unit

MANAGED LANDS DEER PROGRAM INFORMATION. General Requirements

MANAGED LANDS DEER PERMITS WHITE-TAILED DEER PROGRAM INFORMATION General Information

Monitoring Population Trends of White-tailed Deer in Minnesota Marrett Grund, Farmland Wildlife Populations and Research Group

Mule Deer. Dennis D. Austin. Published by Utah State University Press. For additional information about this book. Accessed 3 May :46 GMT

2017 DEER HUNTING FORECAST

DMU 045 Leelanau County Deer Management Unit

2009 WMU 527 Moose, Mule Deer, and White tailed Deer

DMU 046 Lenawee County Deer Management Unit

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE HARVEST MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES FOR HUNTING SEASONS

White-tailed Deer: A Review of the 2010 Provincially Coordinated Hunting Regulation

DMU 040 Kalkaska County Deer Management Unit

I believe it s safe to say that the good ole days for whitetail hunting are right now.

Winter 2016 Hunting District 313 Elk survey (Gardiner to 6-Mile Creek) Date: Flight Duration: Weather/Survey Conditions: Survey Methods

City of Galena 2017 Deer Hunting Survey

Coyotes. The coyote, considered by many as a symbol of the Old West, now resides

NORTH TABLELANDS DEER HERD MANAGEMENT PLAN

Howell Woods Orientation and Safety Open Book Test

CAMERA SURVEYS: HELPING MANAGERS AVOID THE PITFALLS

Rub Lines. Habitat Plans. and. Knowledge of preferred buck rubbing locations can help you develop a habitat plan that enhances hunting success.

contents 2009 Big Game Statistics

Kentucky & Tennessee Semi-Guided and Guided Whitetail Hunts

Population Parameters and Their Estimation. Uses of Survey Results. Population Terms. Why Estimate Population Parameters? Population Estimation Terms

QDM Journey. The Ames Story

Chronic Wasting Disease in Southeast Minnesota. Drs. Michelle Carstensen and Lou Cornicelli Preston Public Meeting December 18, 2018

Analyzing your Buck s Antler Characteristics (For Antler Restrictions)

ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT GUIDELINES FOR THE AND HUNTING SEASONS

720 ac. in Yazoo Co, MS Outstanding Recreational Tract and Timber Investment 2 Gated Entrances off of Highway 3

NORTH DAKOTA STATE REPORT June 2018

Transcription:

Implementing a Successful Deer Management Program Kip Adams Certified Wildlife Biologist Dir. of Ed. & Outreach Quality Deer Management Association

QDMA

Deer Population Trends 30,000,000 25,000,000 20,000,000 15,000,000 10,000,000 5,000,000 0 U.S. Whitetail Population35,000,000 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2005 2010 Year

Deer Population Trends 30,000,000 25,000,000 20,000,000 15,000,000 10,000,000 5,000,000 0 U.S. Whitetail Population35,000,000 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2005 2010 Year

Deer Population Trends 30,000,000 25,000,000 20,000,000 15,000,000 10,000,000 5,000,000 0 U.S. Whitetail Population35,000,000 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2005 2010 Year

Deer Population Trends 30,000,000 25,000,000 20,000,000 15,000,000 10,000,000 5,000,000 0 U.S. Whitetail Population35,000,000 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2005 2010 Year

Deer Population Trends 30,000,000 25,000,000 20,000,000 15,000,000 10,000,000 5,000,000 0 U.S. Whitetail Population35,000,000 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2005 2010 Year

Deer Population Trends 30,000,000 25,000,000 20,000,000 15,000,000 10,000,000 5,000,000 0 U.S. Whitetail Population35,000,000 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2005 2010 Year

Deer Population Trends 30,000,000 25,000,000 20,000,000 15,000,000 10,000,000 5,000,000 0 U.S. Whitetail Population35,000,000 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2005 2010 Year

Deer Population Trends 30,000,000 25,000,000 20,000,000 15,000,000 10,000,000 5,000,000 0 U.S. Whitetail Population35,000,000 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2005 2010 Year

Deer Management Strategies Traditional Deer Management Trophy Deer Management Quality Deer Management

Traditional Management is The approach where any legal buck, regardless of age or antler quality, is harvested and few (if any) does are harvested.

Traditional Deer Management

Habitat Destruction

Deer Human Conflicts

Trophy Management is The approach under only fully mature bucks with high scoring antlers (except culls ) are harvested and does are aggressively harvested to maintain low deer density and optimum nutrition for remaining animals.

Trophy Deer Management

Quality Management is The approach under which young bucks are protected from harvest, combined with an adequate harvest of female deer to produce healthy deer herds in balance with existing habitat conditions.

Quality Deer Management

Four Building Blocks of QDM

Herd Management Simplified The most important halfinch in deer management

Hunters like to shoot bucks But do young bucks provide the same opportunities & excitement as mature bucks?

And do young bucks fulfill the role of mature bucks in a population?

Antlered Buck Management

Antler Point Restrictions Simple, but can be ineffective in high-quality habitats.

Antler Spread Restrictions 19-20 in. 14-15 in. Generally better than antler points, but may protect some mature bucks with narrow antlers.

Age Restrictions Very good but requires field judging skill

Antler Restrictions As of 2008, 22 states had antler restrictions

% Yearling Bucks Buck Harvest Trends 1½ years 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1989 1994 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2008 2009

% Yearling Bucks Buck Harvest Trends 1½ years 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1989 1994 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2008 2009 National Average Pennsylvania

How Fast Can Yearling Bucks Grow If You, Let Them Go So They Can Grow

Buck Age 1.5 years

Buck Age 2.5 years

Buck Age 3.5 years

Buck Age 4.5 years

Increased Harvest Opportunities

Deer Herd Habitat Deer Herd Habitat Habitat Deer Herd Deer Herd Habitat

Why Harvest Does? To Control Population Growth And Density

To Balance The Sex Ratio

To Make Room For And Improve The Quality Of Young Bucks

To Increase Reproductive Success and Recruitment

Carrying Capacity and Recruitment

Antlerless Deer Management When? As early as fawns are weanable about 60 days. Spots will be gone or very indistinct.

Why Harvest Early? To reduce the harvest of buck fawns. Fawns are easiest to distinguish from adult does early in the season.

This is a buck fawn in December Could you tell it was not a doe?

To Increase Nutrition For Other Deer Each deer eats about one ton of forage annually!

Nutritional Gains By Early Harvest Let s say you harvest 20 does and you harvest them 60 days earlier than usual. 20 does X 60 days X 5 lbs food/ day = 6,000 lbs of forage saved! That s the amount of forage from 2 typical 1-2 acre food plots!

To Improve The Sex Ratio Prior To The Rut

To Increase Competition For Breeding

Selective Antlerless Harvest

Doe Fawn Buck Fawn

Things are Improving

How do you apply QDM on public lands?

Quality Deer Management Balance deer herd with habitat Balance adult sex ratio Balance age structure.

Antler Restrictions As of 2008, 22 states had antler restrictions

Deer Harvest Rates ~Public vs. Private~

Deer Harvest Rates ~Public vs. Private~ For Antlered Deer: WMU 2G has the most public land in PA It also has the lowest buck harvest rate In 2009, only 8% of 1.5-year-olds bucks were harvested

Deer Harvest Rates For Antlerless Deer: ~Public vs. Private~ WMU Private Public 4B 23% 26% 2G 16% 4% 96% of antlerless deer in WMU 2G survived the hunting season!

Deer Harvest Rates ~Public vs. Private~ So, QDM is not a public vs. private land issue QDM can be practiced/applied on any lands It simply needs to be tailored to the site (state, region, etc.)

How do you apply QDM on small tracts?

Establish a QDM Cooperative

QDM Cooperative is A group of landowners and hunters working together to improve the quality of the deer herd and hunting experiences on their collective acreage.

QDM Cooperatives Spreading across the whitetail s range Michigan is among the leaders (at least 75 established QDM co-ops) QDMA involved in co-op at Bear Creek.

Cooperative Benefits Nearly half of QDMA members hunt less than 250 acres About 60% hunt less than 500 acres How many acres do bucks use?

Cooperative benefits include... Reduced management costs Reduced trespassing Ability to share data for better picture Membership discounts, etc. Increased acreage to manage.

Does good deer hunting require large tracts of private land?

Does good deer hunting require large tracts of private land? 8.5 years 35 acres

Does good deer hunting require large tracts of private land? 14 points 138 inches 30 acres

How do you do this where you hunt?

How do you do this where you hunt?

How do you do this where you hunt?

How do you do this where you hunt?

How do you do this where you hunt?

How do you do this where you hunt?

Quality Deer Management Association www.qdma.com 1-800-209-DEER Kadams@QDMA.com