Traffic Sensitive Streets. Guidance Notes. GeoPlace Streets Team. Traffic Sensitive Streets. Guidance Note Page 1 of 7.

Similar documents
Data Entry Conventions and Best Practice for the National Street Gazetteer. DEC-NSG Version 3.6. March A Reference Manual.

SLOUGH Stage 3 Road Safety Audit of A4 London Road, M4 J5 to Sutton Lane

E4 Cycle Route Exeter University to Redhayes Bridge. - Recommendations from Exeter Cycling Campaign

Speed Limit Policy Isle of Wight Council

DESIGN CODE. Enterprise West Harlow London Road North Design Code 21

Chapter 4 Route Window C3 Hyde Park and Park Lane shafts. Transport for London

Essential Standard No. 16. Streetworks - Short duration static works carried out from a vehicle

S C O T S. Society of Chief Officers of Transportation in Scotland. Dear Ms Johnston. Footway Parking and Double Parking (Scotland) Bill

Delivering the next generation of road mapping for England and Wales

SCHEME DESIGN AND ENGINEERING

The Cabinet Member for Highways & Streetscene. Aurang Zeb - Head of Highways & Transport

Traffic Management Act 2004 implications of enactment. Nancy Cox Regulatory and Interconnect Manager August 2004

Comments on the Hailsham to Eastbourne Sustainable Transport Corridor

Cycle Traffic and The Strategic Road Network. John Parkin and Phil Jones Presenting on behalf of Highways England

Kings Road, Herne Bay: Proposed Crash Remedial Measure

Traffic Calming Regulations

Design and Installation of Low Level Cycle Signals

How do we design for pedestrians? Case study: transforming the Walworth Road

Report from Embassy Visit to Copenhagen May David Arditti

Amendments to Essex Highway Maintenance Strategy Maintenance Policy and Standards April 2008

IAN WHITE ASSOCIATES. Crawley Station Gateway Public Realm

Cycle traffic and the Strategic Road Network. Sandra Brown, Team Leader, Safer Roads- Design

Public Consultation on Braintree Integrated Transport Package (ITP) HAVE YOUR. Consultation open from 24 September to 5 November 2018 SAY

Lane Rental - A Utility Perspective. Paul Gerrard Street Works Manager, National Grid

Traffic calming regulations (Scotland)

TS 109 DURHAM ROAD QTC PHASE 4 PROJECT PROPOSAL. Page 1

Roads and public rights of way

Report to Cabinet. 18 May 2016

RESPONSIVE ROUNDABOUTS MYTH OR REALITY

// RoWSaF Making roads safer for road workers rowsaf.org.uk. RoWSaF Strategy 2015

INTERIM ADVICE NOTE 93/07 DRIVER LOCATION SIGNS INTERIM PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION

Proposed: Temporary Traffic Management Design Guidance

Appendix 12 Parking on footways and verges

Cycle Routes. Traffic Advisory Leaflet 3/95 March Introduction. Implementation. Project aims. Design

A52. Nottingham Junctions. Construction at Nottingham Road and Cropwell Road junctions commencing early January 2017

LEA BRIDGE ROAD - A STREET FOR EVERYONE Public consultation document

PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION

1 VicRoads Access Management Policies May 2006 Ver VicRoads Access Management Policies May 2006 Version 1.02

Process for managing parking on verges, footways and footpaths

Cabinet Member for Highways & Streetscene. Highway Infrastructure Manager

MILTON ROAD LLF PROJECT UPDATE

BICYCLE FACILITIES INVENTORY: SUMMARY REPORT

Local Highway Panels Members Guide. 5 Crossing Facilities

APPENDIX D. PERS Assessment

ETMS ADVISORY BOOKLET 1 GUIDANCE NOTES FOR ROAD CLOSURES AND DIVERSIONS

Temporary Vehicle Restraint System Policy

The Wincheap Society

MARKHOUSE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS

MAGNA PARK Lutterworth. DHL SUPPLY CHAIN: Design and Access Statement. June

Raised Rib Markings. Traffic Advisory Leaflet 2/95 March Introduction

Cycle network linking Wolverhampton city centre and Bilston town centre with employment sites and residential areas:

Road Safety Factsheet

Entry Treatments. Traffic Advisory Leaflet 2/94 August Introduction. Design. Vertical Deflections. Locations

10 SHERFORD Town Code

Progress update on the Sustainable Movement Corridor scheme Guildford Borough Council, June 2016

March Maidstone Integrated Transport Strategy Boxley Parish Council Briefing Note. Context. Author: Parish Clerk 2 March 2016

CAMBRIDGE SOUTH WEST PARK & RIDE

Chapter 12 TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORT

1 This technical note considers the issues associated with the use of tidal flow bus lanes on key public transport corridors in Cambridge.

Aiming for Zero Road Worker Safety. Mark Pooley Highways Agency Road Worker Safety Programme Manager Monday 11 June 2012

APPENDIX F: TECHNICAL NOTE 22 (VICARAGE ROAD JUNCTION)

Local Highway Panels Members Guide. 2 Speed and Traffic Management

New Directions in Street Auditing: Lessons from the PERS Audits. David Allen, Transport Research Laboratory. Spencer Clark, Transport for London

North West Non-Technical Summary of the Transport Assessment September 2011

A guide to how local communities can change local speed limits

Closing statement. I have chosen not to object in principle to the proposal to close S08.

Cyclists at road narrowings

MILTON ROAD ~ MITCHAM'S CORNER PARAMICS MODEL INITIAL OPTION TESTING

City of Perth Cycle Plan 2029

BLYTHEWOOD PARK, BROMLEY

CUERDEN TRANSPORT PROPOSALS

Regional Cycle Programme Update

Sevenways Roundabout, and the need for a Road Safety Scheme:

APPELLANT S STATEMENT OF CASE

What do Passenger Transport Services do?

Our Approach to Managing Level Crossing Safety Our Policy

Scheme Category. Traffic Management. Traffic Management. Implementation LBAS ,000. Traffic Management. Traffic Management. Traffic Management

Phone: Ref No: 06/2018/0884

Unit 13 Monitoring reinstatement of sub-base and base (roadbase) in non-bituminous materials

TERM CONTRACT FOR THE MANAGEMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF THE SCOTTISH TRUNK ROAD NETWORK NORTH EAST UNIT

Welsh Government Trunk Road Maintenance Manual

Guildford Borough (Draft)

Green Streets and Urban Greenways

Appendix A Type of Traffic Calming Measures Engineering Solutions

Report on trends in mode share of vehicles and people crossing the Canal Cordon to 2013

CAMBOURNE TO CAMBRIDGE BETTER PUBLIC TRANSPORT PROJECT PHASE 2 PUBLIC CONSULTATION MADINGLEY MULCH ROUNDABOUT TO CAMBOURNE

USE OF SPEED AND RED LIGHT CAMERAS FOR TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT: GUIDANCE ON DEPLOYMENT, VISIBILITY AND SIGNING

Local Highway Panels Members Guide. 4 Signs & Road Markings

Know Your TRAFFIC SIGNS. Official Edition. London: TSO

Active Travel Strategy Dumfries and Galloway

Bus and Transit Lane Review Update

Wanaka Community Board 16 November Report for Agenda Item: 1. Temporary Road Closure - Challenge Wanaka Triathlon Event 2017

14. PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS IN MOORHOUSE AVENUE

Agenda Item 34. N11 - Brewery Road Improvement Scheme

A65 TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT. 13 th May 2005

IMPACT OF THE BERMUDA CONNECTIVITY PROJECT ON CYCLING

BACCHER CERTIFICATES / CONTENTS CERTIFICATES / STATUS CONTENTS. l TRAFFIC ACCOMMODATION. ROAD SERVICES (PTY) LTD Your Vision Our Reality!

2. Context. Existing framework. The context. The challenge. Transport Strategy

Streets for All : 9 Use of white lines

Broom Hill/Blackberry Hill Walking and Cycling Improvements

Transcription:

Guidance Notes GeoPlace Streets Team Guidance Note Page 1 of 7

Introduction The guidance note provides information on the definition, role and value of. It will also focus on how and why Traffic Sensitive Streets should be reviewed and how to ensure they keep up to date. What are? Under section 64 of NRSWA a street authority may designate certain streets (or parts of streets) as traffic sensitive. It is a designation that allows highly trafficked highways to be identified as requiring Works Promoters to give greater advanced warning of proposed works or activities. Depending on circumstances, designation may apply to the carriageway only, to a footway or pedestrian area only, or to any part of a length of street. Designations may only apply to certain times of day, days of the week, or days of the year. Why designate a street as Traffic Sensitive? This designation highlights that works or activities in these situations are likely to be particularly disruptive to other road users, but it does not necessarily prevent occupation during traffic sensitive times. Once a designation is made it applies to all works and activities taking place in the street. Criteria to designate a street as Traffic Sensitive A street authority may designate certain streets (or parts of streets) as "traffic sensitive" in one of the following ways: I. Agreement with statutory undertakers known to have apparatus in the street concerned. II. One or more of the following criteria is met: a. the street is one on which at any time the street authority estimate traffic flow to be greater than 500 vehicles per hour per lane of carriageway, excluding bus or cycle lanes; b. the street is a single carriageway two-way road, the carriageway of which is less than 6.5 metres wide, having a total traffic flow of not less than 600 vehicles per hour; c. the street falls within a congestion charges area; d. traffic flow contains more than 25% heavy commercial vehicles; Guidance Note Page 2 of 7

e. the street carries in both directions more than eight buses per hour; f. the street is designated for pre-salting by the street authority as part of its programme of winter maintenance; g. the street is within 100 metres of a critical signalised junction, gyratory or roundabout system; h. the street, or that part of a street, that has a pedestrian flow rate at any time of at least 1300 persons per hour per metre width of footway; i. the street is on a tourist route or within an area where international, national, or significant major local events take place. How to review your Local Highway Authorities With many streets designated as traffic sensitive following their introduction as part of NRSWA in 1991, it is vital Local Highway Authorities undertake a periodic review of traffic sensitive streets to ensure it includes current day street use. The Streetworks Manager, LSG Custodian and Traffic Manager should all be roles that are involved within this process. To undertake a traffic sensitive review there are two distinct requirements: a) Identification of b) Consultation with stakeholders a) Identification of There are no hard and set rules on how to identify traffic sensitive streets and each Local Highway Authority may have its own preferred process. The following approach is recommended practice and has been utilised by Local Highway Authorities already. 1. Identify your winter maintenance routes It is likely your authority will have designated streets that are sensitive to traffic for salting during the winter, therefore this will give a good initial indication of all the streets could be designated as Traffic Sensitive. Streets designated for salting is one of the criteria that can be used to designate a street as traffic sensitive. To ensure confidence in the decision we would advise you sense check against other criteria. Guidance Note Page 3 of 7

2. Utilise Traffic Counts Obtaining traffic counts will enable an authority to identify if streets meet the following criteria: a. the street is one on which at any time the street authority estimate traffic flow to be greater than 500 vehicles per hour per lane of carriageway, excluding bus or cycle lanes; b. the street is a single carriageway two-way road, the carriageway of which is less than 6.5 metres wide, having a total traffic flow of not less than 600 vehicles per hour; c. traffic flow contains more than 25% heavy commercial vehicles; d. the street carries in both directions more than eight buses per hour; Ideally traffic count information collected by your authority will be held against USRNs. If not, coordinate information can be used to identify USRNs within the closest vicinity of the traffic count which will enable authorities to identify streets that are highly trafficked. The DfT hold national traffic count information for England and Wales for Motorways and A Roads which can be utilised if local counts are not held. http://www.dft.gov.uk/traffic-counts/ 3. Traffic Signals Usually obtainable from a local highway authorities traffic management centre, streets can be identified as traffic sensitive if they fall within 100 metres of a critical signalised junction as per the following criteria g. the street is within 100 metres of a critical signalised junction, gyratory or roundabout system; The advised process would be to plot these signals using coordinate information to identify the closest USRN, this would then enable criteria against certain streets to be built up but may also identify streets that have previously not been picked up. 4. Pedestrian Flow & Tourist Routes To ensure completeness it is recommended that authorities consider any critical streets where tourism routes, national, international, or significant major local events exist which may not necessarily be gritted or have the necessary usual flow. Guidance Note Page 4 of 7

If pedestrian counts are available authorities may wish to review footpaths that have a lot of footfall and include those in any review, as fundamentally works on these will still cause disruption to the public. 5. Traffic Sensitive times review. Utilising traffic count data is a positive process in order to understand the network, especially to indicate streets that are only traffic sensitive for a limited period of time. Streets subject to a school run would be an example of this. Ensuring a true reflection of traffic sensitivity gives users full visibility of when they will be able to undertake works or activities causing the minimum of disruption. b) Consultation Following the identification of traffic sensitive streets an authority must: Consult for a period of no less than one month, when objections may be made identify the criteria that is met for each designation of traffic sensitivity It is also advised that where possible an authority should provide a map of the designated traffic sensitive streets to make sure they are easily identifiable. Who needs to be consulted? It is recommended the following stakeholders are consulted: every undertaker known to the street authority to be working in its area every undertaker that has given the authority notice of its intention to start working in its area every other local authority for the street to which the proposed designation relates Transport for London, where the street is in Greater London the chief officer of police, chief executive of fire and rescue authority, the chief executive of the National Health Service ambulance trust Passenger Transport Executives and other transport authorities, such as light rail operators any person who has submitted a written request to be given notice of a proposed designation. This may include other street authorities eg Highways Agency or Network Rail the occupiers of any property that fronts the street concerned Guidance Note Page 5 of 7

What should be provided to stakeholders? A table with the following information is recommended: USRN Identifier for the street used in street works coordination Street Name Name or description of the street Town Geographical location of the street Criteria met Traffic Sensitive criteria met Rationale Rationale used that has met the criteria An example table is provided below USRN Street Name Town Criteria met Rationale 1234567 Smith Street Rochester B,D,F 10 Buses per hour, 888 vehicles per hour In addition, any maps or spatial files that could be provided would ensure that stakeholders can consult effectively What happens following consultation? No objections - If the street authority does not receive any objections within the specified period, or if all objections have been withdrawn, the authority may make the designation. Outstanding objections - the authority should give them careful consideration. It may then make the designation, with or without modifications, or decide not to do so. The street authority should carefully consider the arguments for and against the proposed designation and should act reasonably in coming to its decision. Updating the Local Street Gazetteer Once the consultation is complete and a full traffic sensitive network is complete it needs to be entered into the LSG. Once this data is submitted to GeoPlace and published as part of the National Street Gazetteer, it can be identified for street works coordination. The recommend approach to updating the LSG is in bulk, either by your software or by contacting GeoPlace to help create or advise on the creation of bespoke CSV files. For more information, please contact support@geoplace.co.uk If streets are only traffic sensitive between certain times this must be referred to in any records created Guidance Note Page 6 of 7

Maintaining It is recommended that the street authority reviews its designations periodically. We recommend that this is undertaken every 2-3 years to ensure currency. This may not need to be a full review but should include streets that have experienced change in traffic flows or newly built classified streets. GeoPlace also provide the following health checks to monitor streets that are classified as authority maintained Motorway or A Roads, or have a reinstatement carriageway type of 0, 1 or 2 that aren t designated as traffic sensitive. SP605 - Streets identified as Highway Authority maintained as Motorway, A or B roads that aren t Traffic Sensitive SP606 - Streets identified with a Reinstatement Carriageway type of 0, 1 or 2 that are not Traffic Sensitive Alternatively, the Additional Street Data (ASD) Review provided to each local highway authority monthly provides a core network review where authorities can monitor changes: Consultation It is important to remember that any additions to traffic sensitivity still requires consultation. The recommended approach would be to email all identified stakeholders on a case by case basis. Guidance Note Page 7 of 7