FISH PASSAGE IMPROVEMENT in California s Watersheds. Assessments & Recommendations by the Fish Passage Forum

Similar documents
Five Counties Salmonid Conservation Program - Fish Passage Design Workshop. February 2013

Executive Summary. Map 1. The Santa Clara River watershed with topography.

Project Report for Marsh Creek and Albion River Instream Fish Barrier Removal Flynn Creek Road, CR 135, M.P. 8.1 and 8.3

FINAL REPORT. Yonkers Creek Migration Barrier Removal Project Wonderstump Road Del Norte County. Submitted By:

Newaukum Watershed Culvert Assessment

DEADWOOD CREEK FISH PASSAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

2 nd Steelhead Summit. October 27 & 28, 2016 in San Luis Obispo, CA

SELBY CREEK SILVERADO TRAIL CULVERT FISH PASSAGE ASSESSMENT

Chagrin River TMDL Appendices. Appendix F

Interim Guidance Fish Presence Absence

Abundance of Steelhead and Coho Salmon in the Lagunitas Creek Drainage, Marin County, California

California Steelhead: Management, Monitoring and Recovery Efforts

Mid-Columbia Fisheries Enhancement Group Annual Report Fiscal Year 06: July 1, 2005 June 30, 2006

CHAPTER 4 DESIRED OUTCOMES: VISION, GOALS, AND OBJECTIVES

CALIFORNIA SALMONID STREAM HABITAT RESTORATION MANUAL APPENDIX IX-A CULVERT CRITERIA FOR FISH PASSAGE INTRODUCTION

WFC 50 California s Wild Vertebrates Jan. 11, Inland Waters (Lakes and Streams) Lisa Thompson

Restoring the Kootenai: A Tribal Approach to Restoration of a Large River in Idaho

Draft Central Valley Salmon and Steelhead Recovery Plan

Annual Report for Fiscal Year and Future Plans for the Tillamook Bay Watershed Council

Downstream Migrant Trapping in Russian River Mainstem, Tributaries, and Estuary

Aquatic Organism Passage at Road-Stream Crossings CHUCK KEEPORTS FOREST HYDROLOGIST ALLEGHENY NATIONAL FOREST WARREN, PENNSYLVANIA

State of San Francisco Bay 2011 Appendix O Steelhead Trout Production as an Indicator of Watershed Health

Southern Oregon Coastal Cutthroat Trout

South Fork Chehalis Watershed Culvert Assessment

Ecology of Place: What salmon need Eric Beamer Skagit River System Cooperative. November 2010

FISHERIES BLUE MOUNTAINS ADAPTATION PARTNERSHIP

Study Update Tailrace Slough Use by Anadromous Salmonids

Eastern Brook Trout. Roadmap to

Okanagan Sockeye Reintroduction

2012 Bring Back the Natives Awarded Projects

COLUMBIA LAKE DAM REMOVAL PROJECT

Downstream Migrant Trapping in Russian River Mainstem, Tributaries, and Estuary

Funding Habitat Restoration Projects for Salmon Recovery in the Snake River Region SRFB Grant Round Version: 2/19/16

Maryland Chapter Trout Unlimited Brook Trout Conservation Effort

Columbia Lake Dam Removal Project

Past, Present and Future Activities Being Conducted in the Klamath River Basin Related to the Protection and Recovery of Fish and Their Habitat

Packwood Hydroelectric Project Barrier Analysis December 12, 2006

California Steelhead: Management, Monitoring and Recovery Efforts

Big Spring Creek Habitat Enhancement and Fishery Management Plans

2012 Summary Report on the Juvenile Salmonid and Stream Habitat Monitoring Program

Nechako white sturgeon are an Endangered Species

A.23 RIVER LAMPREY (LAMPETRA

Study Update Fish Distribution and Species Composition

Salmon Five Point Approach restoring salmon in England

Strategies for mitigating ecological effects of hatchery programs

WHATCOM COUNTY FISH PASSAGE BARRIER INVENTORY FINAL REPORT

Upper Yuba River Watershed Chinook Salmon and Steelhead Habitat Assessment

Sub-watershed Summaries

Fish Migration Barrier Severity and Steelhead Habitat Quality in the Malibu Creek Watershed

Coho. Oregon Native Fish Status Report 13

Backgrounder and Frequently Asked Questions

STREAM SURVEY File form No..

San Lorenzo Valley Water District, Watershed Management Plan, Final Version Part I: Existing Conditions Report

COA-F17-F-1343 YEAR END REPORT

Western native Trout Status report

Ned Currence, Nooksack Indian Tribe

APPENDIX B: CATALOG OF HUMBOLDT COUNTY CULVERTS LOCATED ON FISH-BEARING STREAM REACHES

Potlatch River Drainage: Salmonid Presence: Largest lower Clearwater River tributary

Searsville Dam Removal

Juvenile Steelhead and Stream Habitat Conditions Steelhead and Coho Salmon Life History Prepared by: DW ALLEY & Associates, Fishery Consultant

Guidance Note. Hydropower Guidance Note: HGN 8 Fish Passage. When do you need to install a fish pass?

Trout Unlimited Comments on the Scope of Environmental Impact Statement for the Constitution Pipeline Project, Docket No. PF12-9

Fish Passage Assessment of Private Stream Crossings on Lower Stonybrook Creek

Fish Habitat Restoration and Monitoring in Southeast Washington. Andy Hill Eco Logical Research, Inc.

Little Kern Golden Trout Status:

SALMONID ACTION PLAN FINAL DRAFT

Tuolumne River Gravel Introduction

TREND ANALYSIS FOR JUVENILE AND ADULT STEELHEAD

Stronghold Investment Partnership Basin Liaisons 2009

OVERVIEW OF MID-COLUMBIA FISHERIES ENHANCEMENT GROUP

THE WESTERN NATIVE TROUT INITIATIVE PLAN FOR STRATEGIC ACTIONS November GOALS, OBJECTIVES, and KEY STRATEGIC ACTIONS

PROJECT TO INSTALL LARGE WOOD HABITAT STRUCTURES IN THE CARMEL RIVER USING CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME GRANT FUNDS

Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management Division of Fish and Wildlife American Shad Habitat Plan for the Pawcatuck River

3. The qualification raised by the ISRP is addressed in #2 above and in the work area submittal and review by the ISRP as addressed in #1.

Project Completion Abstract Fish Passage Activity ( Engineering Activities)

The Calawah River System

The Salmonid Species. The Salmonid Species. Definitions of Salmonid Clans. The Salmonid Species

Black Sturgeon Regional Plan

Columbia Lake Dam Removal Project

April 26, Chairman Rockefeller and members of the Fish and Wildlife Committee. Briefing from Mid-Columbia Regional Fish Enhancement Group (RFEG)

CHAPTER 2 - THE COQUILLE FISHERY

Environmental Review and Permitting for Wild Trout

Understanding the Impacts of Culvert Performance on Stream Health

Management of headwater streams in the White Mountain National Forest

Current Distribution of Beavers in California: Implications for Salmonids

OKANAGAN RIVER RESTORATION INITIATIVE - FAQ

LIFE HISTORY DIVERSITY AND RESILIENCE

Throughout the Pacific Northwest, salmon and steelhead have been listed under the Endangered Species Act because their existence is either threatened

East Kitsap Peninsula WRIA 15 Salmon Habitat Restoration Strategy Summary

Maintaining biodiversity in mixed-stock salmon fisheries in the Skeena watershed

SALMON FACTS. Chinook Salmon. Oncorhynchus tshawytscha

Salmon Biology Station

(Revised February,2005) CULVERTS, BRIDGES, AND FORDS

Salmon and Steelhead in the American River Tim Horner, PhD Geology Department California State University, Sacramento

NATIVE FISH CONSERVATION PLAN FOR THE SPRING CHINOOK SALMON ROGUE SPECIES MANAGEMENT UNIT

Assessing Ecosystem Impacts from Road Stream Crossings through Community Involvement

DRAFT. Stonybrook Creek Watershed

Chadbourne Dam Repair and Fish Barrier

Benchmark Statement Respecting the Fish, Fish Habitat and Fisheries of Fish and Little Fish Lake, within the Taseko River Watershed.

Steelhead/rainbow trout resources of the Eel River watershed

Transcription:

FISH PASSAGE IMPROVEMENT in California s Watersheds Assessments & Recommendations by the Fish Passage Forum

FISH PASSAGE IMPROVEMENT in California s Watersheds The mission of the Fish Passage Forum is to protect and restore listed anadromous salmonid species in California by promoting the collaboration among public and private sectors for fish passage improvement projects and programs. report design and layout: Jeff Bright Design www.jeffbrightdesign.com cover photo and chapter endpage details: Thomas Dunklin www.thomasbdunklin.com cover inset photos (left to right): 1, 3, 4 David Pritchett; 2, 5 file photos interior inset photos: credit as noted State Coastal Conservancy 2005

Barriers to Fish Passage and Their Significance California s salmon, steelhead and other aquatic life depend on the health of our coastal rivers and streams. Healthy streams provide cool water, clean gravel, natural meandering channels, and access to upstream habitat. But almost every stream along our 1,100-mile coast has been fragmented by roads, dams, culverts, concrete channels, low-water crossings or other structures that create difficult or impassable migration barriers for fish. For landowners these structures may also cause loss of land and property as a result of erosion in the surrounding area. David Pritchett photo Salmon and steelhead are anadromous fish: they are born and reared in freshwater, move to the ocean to grow and mature, and return to freshwater to reproduce. Once numbering in the millions, their populations are a fraction of their historical abundance. Coho salmon, for example, are currently at 6 to15% of their abundance during the 1940 s. One of the greatest factors in their decline has been migration barriers. Migration barriers prevent salmon and 1

David Pritchett photo Michael Love photo steelhead from reaching stream areas needed for spawning and rearing. Barriers not only create difficult or impassable heights for migration but can also alter the depth of jump pools and eliminate the riffles and resting areas fish need as they swim up or downstream. Barriers alter instream flows, water temperatures, and the habitat diversity and complexity salmon and steelhead need to survive. Barriers also disrupt the biological and natural sediment balance in the stream, causing severe bank erosion, loss of property, and diminishing the downstream transport of sediment needed to replenish our beaches. From large dams to steep culverts, migration barriers are one of the leading causes in the decline of salmon and steelhead populations. Barriers prevent fish from reaching spawning and rearing areas. Most migration barriers were built in an era when little thought was given to fish migration. Some migration barriers, such as undersized or steep culverts, were immediately impassable. They increased stream velocities, diminished water depth, and/or were too far above the streambed. Other culverts and crossings that were previously passable became impassable due to inadequate maintenance or alterations to the stream channel over time. Small migration barriers may seem insignificant, but the cumulative effect of culverts, road crossings, and other structures up and down the coast has impaired fish passage greatly. Working together to remove barriers, large and small, is an essential part of recovering coastal salmon and steelhead. 2

How Bad Is the Problem? Afirst step in recovering salmon and steelhead is determining how many migration barriers exist. A Coastal Conservancy study identifies more than 13,000 potential barriers to fish passage in California s coastal watersheds. At least 2,500 of these structures are severe or impassable, and detailed assessments will likely show that most of the others hinder or block salmon or steelhead from migrating up and downstream. These estimates do not include 3,700 stream crossings owned or managed by Caltrans in coastal watersheds, many of which also pose significant barriers to fish passage. The number of migration barriers is similar in other parts of the State. In interior watersheds, there are at least 13,000 migration barriers, including more than 6,800 stream crossings owned or managed by Caltrans. Across California, detailed and comprehensive studies are underway to evaluate the severity of each of these potential barriers, identify opportunities to remedy them, and prioritize their removal or modification. 3

What Is Being Done? Recovering salmon and steelhead on the California coast requires landowners, agencies, and others to work together to identify and remove barriers to fish passage. Matt Stoecker photo While new culverts and other stream crossings are designed to insure unimpeded fish passage for both adult and juvenile fish, old barriers are a big problem. But what can we do to remove or modify existing migration barriers? The Fish Passage Forum, an association of public, private and government organizations, is developing programs to assist private landowners, community groups, and public agencies in efforts to remove migration barriers and restore currently inaccessible habitat. The Forum s work extends beyond inventorying and compiling databases on barriers. Studies of fish behavior and migration needs, for example, have improved our ability to assess the 4

impacts of migration barriers and develop solutions that work with natural stream conditions. For example, we ve learned that modifying road culverts requires taking into account factors such as stream hydrology, channel stability, floodplain function, and the swimming abilities of adult and juvenile fish. To make fish passage improvement projects easier to complete, the Fish Passage Forum is working to coordinate and streamline permits required for restoration. We are seeking long-term funding for fish passage projects, and conducting workshops that provide design and project implementation assistance to private landowners and local agencies. We are also developing education programs to increase public support for fish passage work. This culvert on Lindsay Creek in Humboldt County was formerly a complete barrier to fish passage (top). It was replaced with a natural-bottom culvert (bottom) and now provides complete passage for wild salmon, such as this healthy chinook making its way upstream to spawn. Humboldt County photo Margaret Tauzer, NOAA Fisheries photo 5

What Can You Do and What Resources Are Available? Landowners are the most important managers of California s coastal streams. Their role as good stream stewards means taking responsibility for our watersheds and ensuring that our activities support and sustain streams that salmon, steelhead, and other aquatic life depend on. Private landowners, local officials, and members of watershed groups all have a role to play in restoring salmon and steelhead runs to California s rivers and streams. The first step in improving stream habitat is planning the project carefully. Examine your stream, analyze its problems and understand what caused them. Get advice and assistance from professionals to determine what should be done, and understand the amount of effort, money, and permits needed to complete and maintain the project. Members of the Fish Passage Forum are here to help. Funding Funding for fish passage improvement is available from a variety of sources, including the Coastal Conservancy, the Department of Fish and Game, NOAA Fisheries Services, and others. For more information, contact any of these agencies directly at the websites listed on the following page. 6

Coastal Conservancy: http://www.scc.ca.gov Department of Fish and Game: Fisheries Restoration Grant Program: http://www.dfg.ca.gov/ nafwb/fishgrant.html NOAA Restoration Center: http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/ habitat/restoration Technical Assistance Specialists with the California Department of Fish and Game are available to discuss restoration options as well as provide advice regarding potential funding sources, such as the DFG s Fishery Restoration Grant Program. You can contact them by phone at the numbers below: North Coast Region: Gary Flosi, 707-725-1060 San Francisco Bay Region: Bob Coey, 707-944-5500 Central Coast Region: John Kleinfelter, 805-549-3700 South Coast Region: Mary Larson, 562-342-7150 Around the State, agencies and private citizens are improving fish passage in local watersheds. Restoration of fish passage achieves long-term savings for local governments in the form of lower maintenance costs at stream crossings and culverts. One such case was this installation (bottom) of a fish-friendly, natural-bottom culvert at Jordan Creek in Del Norte County. David Pritchett photo Art Reeve, Del Norte County photo Five Counties Program: 530-623-1351 extension 5 7

Websites and Online Technical Documents FishXing is a website maintained by State and federal agencies to provide a central source for information on fish migration barrier removal. The website was developed by the Forest Service and is located at http://www.stream.fs.fed.us/fishxing. It features sample projects, videos and other media, as well as software for evaluating and designing fish passage projects, an annotated bibliography, extensive links to design manuals, regulatory and management guidelines, literature on fish migration characteristics, and links to websites for related agencies and organizations. The Coastal Conservancy report Inventory of Barriers to Fish Passage in California s Coastal Watersheds identifies the 175 highest-priority total migration barriers, more than 1,000 moderate-priority fish migration barriers, and more than 20,000 additional sites that may affect the free passage of salmon and steelhead. The report, other associated data, and a version of ARC Explorer (free GIS software) is available from the Coastal Conservancy or online at http://www.calfish.org. These tools allow the viewer to navigate any given watershed, and extract fish passage data from locations clearly demarcated on a GIS layer. At the CalFish website the viewer may analyze barrier data in the context of species presence/absence, habitat condition, restoration projects, and a variety of other factors. Chapter 9 of the California Salmonid Stream Habitat Restoration Manual addresses fish passage evaluations at stream crossings (roads, bridges, etc.). The manual includes the Department of Fish and Game and NOAA Fisheries Services design criteria for fish passage improvement projects and data collection criteria for evaluations using the FishXing software. It also details many aspects of stream restoration and watershed monitoring associated with fisheries habitat improvement projects. The manual is the California standard for fisheries habitat improvement. The new section, Part IX Fish Passage Evaluation at Stream Crossings, can be downloaded at http://www.dfg.ca.gov/nafwb/pubs/2003/ FishPassage.pdf. 8

Ross Taylor photo This hefty chinook salmon was found and photographed above a former barrier on Lindsay Creek, tributary to the Mad River. Thanks to the joint efforts of nearby landowners, DFG, the Coastal Conservancy, the County Department of Public Works, Simpson Timber, and others, four migration barriers one county and three private were removed between 2002 and 2004. Coho salmon, chinook salmon, steelhead, and coastal cutthroat trout are now found spawning upstream of these former barriers, following a 50-year absence. 9