Public Works Committee Meeting Richard E. Mastrangelo Council Chamber November 20, 2017

Similar documents
Cycle Track Design Best Practices Cycle Track Sections

Watertown Complete Streets Prioritization Plan. Public Meeting #1 December 14, 2017

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

Public Information Centre

Clybourn Ave. Protected Bike Lane Study Halsted St. to Division St.

CURBSIDE ACTIVITY DESIGN

Roadways. Roadways III.

Active Transportation Facility Glossary

Bicycle Facilities Planning

Road Diets FDOT Process

Off-road Trails. Guidance

Guidance. ATTACHMENT F: Draft Additional Pages for Bicycle Facility Design Toolkit Separated Bike Lanes: Two-Way to One-Way Transitions

City of Vallejo Traffic Calming Toolbox

EUCLID AVENUE PARKING STUDY CITY OF SYRACUSE, ONONDAGA COUNTY, NEW YORK

Tonight is for you. Learn everything you can. Share all your ideas.

WELCOME Public Information Centre

Memorandum. Sunday, July 13, Saturday, July 19, 2014

Appendix C. TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM TOOLBOX

Protected Bike Lanes in San Francisco Mike Sallaberry SFMTA NACTO Workshop - Chicago IL

Telegraph Avenue Complete Streets DRAFT Recommendations. Oakland Public Works Department September 11 and 13, 2014 Open Houses

Los Altos Hills Town Council - June 18, 2015 Palo Alto City Council June 22, AGENDA ITEM #2.B Presentation

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

Pennsylvania Avenue (CR 484) Design Alternatives Study

1 st and 2 nd Street Couplet FAQ s

Richmond-Adelaide Cycle Tracks

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. North Harrison Street (Lee Highway to Little Falls Road) Comparative Analysis. Prepared for:

STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING June 17, Streetscape Overview Burlington Comprehensive Master Plan

Omaha s Complete Streets Policy

Chapter 2: Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit

54 th Avenue North Complete Streets Concept Plan

Broad Street Bicycle Boulevard Design Guidelines

2014/2015 BIKE ROUTE PLAN 83 AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANE

CITY OF OTTAWA ROADWAY MODIFICATION APPROVAL UNDER DELEGATED AUTHORITY

City of Seattle Edward B. Murray, Mayor

Bay to Bay Boulevard Complete Streets Project

MEMORANDUM. Earl Haugen and UND Transportation and Traffic Coordination Committee

Mission-Geneva Transportation Study Community Workshop 2 July 8, 2006

Southview Blvd & 3 rd Avenue Improvement Project. Public Open House December 4, to 7pm

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM

CHAPTER 16 PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES DESIGN AND TECHNICAL CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item No. 14 Town of Atherton

Water Street Promenade. Engineering and Design Services. Public Information Meeting No. 2. Education / Infrastructure / Innovation. Maplewood Avenue &

Route 47 (North Main Street) Reconstruction

Bridgewater Complete Streets Prioritization Plan and Pedestrian Safety Assessment

PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Item to be Addressed Checklist Consideration YES NO N/A Required Description Complete Streets Guidelines

GENERAL. 1. Description

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

CRESTON ROAD COMPLETE AND SUSTAINABLE STREETS CORRIDOR PLAN

102 Avenue Corridor Review

10.0 CURB EXTENSIONS GUIDELINE

Pine Hills Road Pedestrian/Bicycle Safety Study Board of County Commissioners Work Session

Project Goal and Description. Why Broadway? Broadway SFMTA.COM/BROADWAY. The goal of the Broadway Safety Improvement

City of San Diego Vision Zero Draft Strategic Plan FY 2017

Board of Supervisors February 27, 2017

Lawrence Avenue Streetscape Concepts August 30, 2011

BETHEL ROAD AND SEDGWICK ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY

HARRISON STREET/OAKLAND AVENUE COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Complete Street Analysis of a Road Diet: Orange Grove Boulevard, Pasadena, CA

Reference number /VP. Lafayette Downtown Congestion Study - Additional Traffic Analysis

Designing Complete Streets: What you need to know

Balancing Operation & Safety for Motorized and Non-Motorized Traffic

Saskatchewan Drive Roadway Rehabilitation and Shared-Use Path Widening

REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

Harbord Street and Hoskin Avenue Bicycle Lane Upgrades

Providence Downtown Transit Connector STAKEHOLDER MEETING #2. Stakeholder Meeting #1 October 24, 2016

HIGHBURY AVENUE/HAMILTON ROAD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE 1 MAY 14, 2015

Edenbrook Hill Drive Traffic Calming Study

Agenda. Overview PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

TRAFFIC CALMING GUIDE FOR TORONTO CITY OF TORONTO TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVISION

Chapter 3 BUS IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS

122 Avenue: 107 Street to Fort Road

Southwest Bus Rapid Transit (SW BRT) Functional Planning Study - Executive Summary January 19 LPT ATTACHMENT 2.

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Albany Shaker Road Corridor Study Public Meeting # 2

Moving Together Conference Complete Streets from the MassDOT District 5 Perspective

Sebastopol Charter School Traffic Management Plan

Atwood Avenue Fair Oaks Avenue Cottage Grove Road

San Jose Transportation Policy

Downtown Naples Mobility and Connectivity Study. Naples City Council Presentation January 2017

Implementing Complete Streets in Ottawa. Project Delivery Process and Tools Complete Streets Forum 2015 October 1, 2015

Feasibility Study. Expo-Downtown Bicycle Connector

Ottawa Beach Road Study

C C C

» Draft Recommendations» Discussion» Next Steps. Plan for Walking and Biking

TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Agenda Staff Report

STANLEY STREET December 19, 2017

In station areas, new pedestrian links can increase network connectivity and provide direct access to stations.

NEWMARKET UPHAM S CORNER

9/25/2018. Multi-Modal Level of Service (MMLOS) Bianca Popescu, Transportation Planner

Physical Implications of Complete Streets Policies

Boston Post Road Design Feasibility Study

Overview. Illinois Bike Summit IDOT Complete Streets Policy Presentation. What is a Complete Street? And why build them? And why build them?

MINERAL AVENUE CORRIDOR ASSESSMENT STUDY IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY

June 29, Dear Mr. Walter:

Classification Criteria

Giles Run Connector Road

STONY PLAIN ROAD STREETSCAPE

Data Analysis February to March 2018 Identified safety needs from reported collisions and existing travel patterns. SFMTA Board of

Caltrans Sloat Boulevard Pedestrian Safety Project Response to Community Questions, Comments & Concerns

Transcription:

Public Works Committee Meeting Richard E. Mastrangelo Council Chamber November 20, 2017

Purpose of Meeting Why are we here? Project Recap/Updates Project Limits/Segments Road Diet Concept Lessons Learned Revisit Design Recommendation Overview of Bicycle Options Analysis of Bicycle Facilities Recommendations Next Steps Where do we go from here? Questions

Why are we here? Joint Public Works Sub committee and Bicycle & Pedestrian Committee Meeting held in June 2017 We are here today to: Provide an update related to implementing enhanced bicycle accommodations along Mt. Auburn Street Discuss thoughts and observations related to bicycle accommodations from project stakeholders Identify areas where additional analysis is needed

Who have we met with? Held a meeting with MassDOT officials to discuss findings from June 2017 presentation Continued coordination with MBTA regarding bus operations along corridor Met with Cambridge DPW to discuss operations and maintenance of bicycle facilities Reviewed concepts with Watertown Fire & Police Departments

Project Website / Outreach Project website www.mountauburnstreet.com Regina Villa Associates responsible for website Provide project updates Email list / comment section Uploaded Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ s) To date, we have responded to 44 comments 1,775 unique visitors to the website Sent mailings to project abutters about meeting

Conceptual Layout Updated cross sections based on feedback from MassDOT / initial alternatives analysis Analyzed bus stop locations for future implementation of Transit Signal Priority (TSP) Far side bus stop locations are preferable Analyzed impacts of each alternative in relation to other modes of transportation, operations, and maintenance Began preliminary layout of alternatives

Mt. Auburn Street Corridor 2 1 3 4 Watertown Square City of Cambridge Analysis separated into four segments: (1) Patten Street to Walnut Street (2) Walnut Street to Dexter Avenue (3) Dexter Avenue to Arlington Street (Coolidge Sq.) (4) Arlington Street to Cambridge city line

Patten Street to Walnut Street (1) Proposed cross section remains consistent with original layout Traffic volumes and intersection spacing preclude road diet concept Must maintain two travel lanes on each approach Bicycle lanes are not feasible if existing curb line is to be maintained Share the road treatment (sharrows) Future completion of Community Path and DCR Greenway will link Watertown Sq. with Cambridge

Walnut Street to Dexter Avenue (2) Traffic volumes allow for one travel lane in each direction Space available for left turn pockets at a majority of intersecting side streets Pedestrian activity from northside of Mt. Auburn Street to Hosmer School

Dexter Avenue to Arlington Street (3) (Coolidge Sq.) Additional parking demands Classified as a limited business district Requires 8 foot parking stalls Need for loading/delivery areas Existing sidewalk widths limited compared to pedestrian demand Concepts of Coolidge Square still being developed

Arlington Street to Cambridge city line (4) Additional right of way available Higher travel speeds High volume bus stop adjacent to the Tufts building Lower density of driveways in this stretch of the corridor

Mt. Auburn Street Corridor Recommended concept is predicated on efficient traffic flow of 17,000 vehicles and 5,000 bus passengers per day Improving capacity/operations at signalized intersections Providing turn pockets at unsignalized intersections Minimizing delays/stopping in remaining through lanes If these conditions are not met, a road diet is no longer feasible

Arsenal Street Joint Public Works and Public Safety meeting held on June 12, 2017 Importance of parking in commercial areas Parking stall width / clearance to edge of travel lane Bicycle and pedestrian conflicts at bus stops Minimize queuing behind turning vehicles Emergency response times Impacts of snow and ice Travel and parking lane widths Removal on separated paths

(from June 2017 meeting) Work within existing curb to curb width of Mount Auburn Street as it relates to vehicular and bicycle facilities

(from June 2017 meeting) Walnut Street to Dexter Avenue North side (westbound to Watertown Square) Further investigate separated facilities Alternatives 2a & 2b (from June 2017) If deemed unsuitable, provide buffered bike lane Alternatives 1a & 1b (from June 2017) South side (eastbound to Cambridge) Provide buffered bike lane On street side of parking or along curb in areas without parking Alternative 1a (from June 2017)

General Overview Buffered bike lane Parking protected bike lane

Benefits Painted buffers (roadside and door zone) Prevents bikers being struck by vehicle doors Eliminates pedal strike with curb Anticipated layout for visually impaired Curb extensions at crosswalks can be provided Favorable option related to on street parking Maintains maneuverability in relation to disabled vehicles and emergency response

Issues Lack of physical barrier between bicycles and vehicles Potential for double parking in the bike lane Conflict between bicycles and vehicles parking Abundance of pavement markings

Benefits Parked vehicles provide physical barrier between bicycles and traveling vehicles Increased perception of safety Removes conflict between bicycles and vehicles parking along Mt. Auburn Street Reduced infringement upon bike lane by delivery trucks

Operational and Safety Issues Parking stalls located adjacent to travel lane Vehicles tend to encroach into buffer Limited ability to pull over for emergency vehicles Bus/bicycle conflict Bus will block the entire bike lane Decreased maneuverability for bicyclists Pedestrian/bicycle visibility Bicyclist less visible to turning vehicles Decreased pedestrian visibility at mid block crossings

Maintenance Issues Watertown utilizes automated trash pickup Toter placement in relation to equipment limitations Arm would extend through parking lane Requires specialized equipment Street sweeping/plowing Maintenance of drainage structures Manpower Facilities require additional manpower Increased service contracts

Snow and Ice Issues May require more frequent parking bans Potential parking bans specific to Mt. Auburn Street Improper parking will impede snow clearing Creates a double windrow of snow Impacts parking and sidewalk access Anticipate snow removal when accumulation exceeds six inches Flooding/icing issues in bike lane and at drain structures

Mt. Auburn Street Corridor Mt. Auburn Street (West of Coolidge Square) North side (westbound to Watertown Square) Separated bicycle lane (Alternatives 2a & 2b) Buffered bicycle lane (Alternatives 1a & 1b) South side (eastbound to Cambridge) Buffered bicycle lane on travel lane side of parking (Alternative 1a) Recommendation from June 2017 meeting

North side of Mt. Auburn St. (West of Coolidge Sq.) Updated cross section with 2 foot shoulders and 2 to 3 foot buffer Cannot provide consistent grade at driveway crossings Bicycles would transition down to driveway openings North Side South Side (to Watertown Sq.) (to Cambridge) 57 Proposed Roadway Width 11 3 (varies) 5 Travel Walk & Bike Buffer 2 Grass Shoulder Strip 10 Turn 11 Travel 5 8 2 Bike Buffer Parking (varies) Walk & Grass Strip

North side of Mt. Auburn St. (West of Coolidge Sq.) Bus would stop in the travel lane Headways are short (5 7 minutes) during peak hours Eleven bus stops in each direction along Mt. Auburn Street Floating bus stops not feasible Bicycle/pedestrian conflicts at bus stops Reduced driver anticipation/recognition of bicyclists (side streets/driveways)

North side of Mt. Auburn St. (West of Coolidge Sq.) Limited space to pull over for emergency vehicles or during lane interruptions/accidents Based on the analysis presented: A bike lane on the north side of Mt. Auburn Street, west of Coolidge Square is not feasible Violates our Road Diet policy: Recommended concept is predicated on efficient traffic flow of 17,000 vehicles and 5,000 bus passengers per day

North side of Mt. Auburn St. (West of Coolidge Sq.) Provides horizontal separation only Vehicles can encroach on buffer/bike lane Difficult to enforce separation Flexible posts could be considered in the future Vehicles can pull over for emergency responders Encroach in buffer/bike lane North Side South Side (to Watertown Sq.) (to Cambridge) 57 Proposed Roadway Width 5 11 3 Bike Buffer Travel 10 Turn 11 2 5 2 8 Travel Buffer Bike Buffer Parking

North side of Mt. Auburn St. (West of Coolidge Sq.) Snow removal No impacts to snow operations Shoulder widening at bus stops Allows bus to pull out of travel lane Creates a conflict point with bike lane Bicycle can use travel lane to pass Removes bicycle/pedestrian conflict

South side of Mt. Auburn St. (West of Coolidge Sq.) With our analysis we were able to include an additional buffer to increase offset from travel lane Width of bicycle facility is considered the sum of the buffers and the bike lane This addresses concerns that bicyclists will be right next to traveling vehicles, but no physical barrier is provided North Side South Side (to Watertown Sq.) (to Cambridge) 57 Proposed Roadway Width 5 11 3 Bike Buffer Travel 10 Turn 11 2 5 2 8 Travel Buffer Bike Buffer Parking

Arlington Street to Cambridge city line Analysis predicated around separated bicycle facilities on each approach One travel lane in each direction Maintain on street parking on both sides of Mt. Auburn Street Bike lane would be at sidewalk level at driveway crossings Bump outs required at driveways for grade transitions Inclusion of a floating bus stop at Tufts building

Arlington Street to Cambridge city line Traversable width Concerns regarding maneuverability from emergency response officials based on: One travel lane in each direction with parking on both sides Curb bump outs at driveways would create pinch points along the corridor Based on our initial analysis, a separated bike lane on each approach is not feasible North Side South Side (to Watertown Sq.) (to Cambridge) 56 Proposed Roadway Width (varies) Walk & Grass Strip 5 8 4 Bike Buffer Parking 11 Travel 11 Travel 8 5 4 Parking Buffer Bike (varies) Walk & Grass Strip

Mt. Auburn Street Corridor Signalized intersections Bike boxes Additional signage Striping to increase visibility of bicyclists Cannot provide separated bicycle phase at signalized intersections Introduces additional delays Reduction in Level of Service (LOS) Unsignalized intersections Pavement markings to increase visibility of bicyclists

Mt. Auburn Street from Walnut Street to Dexter Avenue: Northside buffered bike lane alongside curb Southside buffered bike lane on the traffic side of parking Scenario will include: buffer between bike lane and travel lane door zone buffer adjacent to parking stalls Arlington Street to Cambridge City line Eliminated option of a separated bicycle lane on each side Investigating a combination of separated/buffered options

Conceptual Renderings of Buffered Bike s Before After (facing east) (facing east)

Where do we go from here? Develop concepts for: Coolidge Square Finalize cross section from Arlington Street to Cambridge City line Anticipate mid January meeting Continue coordination with DCR Fresh Pond improvements at Cambridge line Perform additional analysis of Parker Street area to evaluate impacts to Common St. intersection

Where do we go from here? Develop corridor wide roll plan Draft plan will be posted on website in February for public comment/review Layout will be based on recommendations and outcome of Coolidge Square Meeting Present draft roll plan at open house style meeting Foster discussion from abutters and stakeholders Tentative date of late February/March 2018 Advance to MassDOT 25% Design stage Project currently programmed for FY 2022

How to Comment Email the project team: Team@MountAuburnStreet.com Complete a written comment form Visit the project website and sign up for email updates: www.mountauburnstreet.com