Critical Habitat: No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Similar documents
Best Management Practices. for Trapping Badger in the United States

SUITABILITY OF POTENTIAL REINTRODUCTION SITES FOR SAN JOAQUIN KIT FOXES

Hartmann s Mountain Zebra Updated: May 2, 2018

Life history Food Distribution Management... 98

Frequently Asked Questions About Revised Critical Habitat and Economic Analysis for the Endangered Arroyo Toad

San Joaquin Kit Fox. San Joaquin Kit Fox (Vulpes macrotus mutica) Management Status. Heritage Status Rank: G4S2/3

Best Management Practices

Crossing Corridors. Objective. Materials. Background Information

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Feasibility Study on the Reintroduction of Gray Wolves to the Olympic Peninsula

Ecological Pyramids Adapted from The Nevada Outdoor School, The Playa Ecological Pyramids Lesson Plan

Vernal Pool Tadpole Shrimp (Lepidurus packardi)

Long-tailed Weasel. Mustela frenata. Other common names. Introduction. None

EEB 122b PRACTICE SECOND MIDTERM

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

Best Management Practices

A.23 RIVER LAMPREY (LAMPETRA

Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Long history in ecology

Causes of Tiger (Panthera tigris) Population Decline, and Potential Consequences if the Decline Continues

Justification for Rainbow Trout stocking reduction in Lake Taneycomo. Shane Bush Fisheries Management Biologist Missouri Department of Conservation

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

Living World Review #2

San Joaquin Kit Fox (Vulpes macrotus mutica)

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion

Summary of discussion

Best Management Practices. Trapping Red Foxes in the United States

Wildlife Introduction

Peace Region Wildlife Regulations Proposed Changes for Comment ( )

Compliance Biology, Mammal Survey Summary Letter, Vista Canyon Ranch, Los Angeles County (October 2007)

LICENSED FUR TRAPPERS' AND DEALERS' REPORT Prepared by. Matthew Meshriy

ESRM 350 Habitat Loss and Fragmentation

Best Management Practices for Trapping Weasels in the United States

Impact of Climate Change on Bees in the Eastern Forest: Diversity and Adaptations of Organisms

SPECIES FACT SHEET. Common Name: Siuslaw Sand Tiger Beetle or Siuslaw Hairy-necked Tiger Beetle

11426 Moorage Way P.O. Box 368 LaConner, WA Phone: Fax:

Chagrin River TMDL Appendices. Appendix F

Saiga: Spirit of the Steppe. You can do things every day to be a hero for saiga! by San Diego Zoo Global. Created for the Saiga Conservation Alliance

Managing Wildlife Populations

Montana Natural Heritage Program 1515 East Sixth Ave., Helena, Montana (406)

5 th Grade Science Pre-assessment Organisms & Environments Unit 5 KEY

Monitoring Population Trends of White-tailed Deer in Minnesota Marrett Grund, Farmland Wildlife Populations and Research Group

Amendment to a Biological Assessment/Evaluation completed for the Coon Creek Land Disposal completed December Grand Valley Ranger District

Draft Central Valley Salmon and Steelhead Recovery Plan

Appendix E.14. Spotlight Surveys Report

MOUNTAIN LION MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES FOR LION DAU-L17

PROTECTING SAGE GROUSE AND THEIR HABITAT IN THE WEST. John Harja Senior Counsel on Detail to the Public Lands Office

P.O. Box 24 Joshua Tree, California July 16, 2015

Invasive Versus Endemic Species

Purple Sea Urchin Barrens

REBOUND. on the. It was the winter of 2000/2001, and it seemed like the snow

Minnesota Deer Population Goals

Minnesota Deer Population Goals

Amur Leopard - Diet. Learn more online conservewildcats.org

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

Best Management Practices

Oregon Spotted Frogs 101. Deanna Lynch U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Calephelis borealis (Grote & Robinson), 1866 Northern Metalmark (Riodinidae: Riodininae) SUMMARY

Reduction in Biological Diversity Section 4.1 p Section 4.3 p

Cascadia Wild Wolverine Tracking Project Season Report

THE WOLF WATCHERS. Endangered gray wolves return to the American West

IB BIOLOGY SUMMER WORK OPTION G: Ecology & Conservation

Aquatic Biological Assessment. Lassen 15 Restoration Project. Modoc National Forest Warner Mountain Ranger District

Sustaining Wild Species

PREDATOR CONTROL AND DEER MANAGEMENT: AN EAST TEXAS PERSPECTIVE

Sources of Lead Exposing California Condors

Invasive Species. Grade Levels. Introduction. This activity is intended for grades 9 12.

Stakeholder Activity

AN INCIDENTAL TAKE PLAN FOR CANADA LYNX AND MINNESOTA S TRAPPING PROGRAM

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Predator and Furbearer Management. SPECIES: Predatory and Furbearing Mammals

California Steelhead: Management, Monitoring and Recovery Efforts

ROCKWALL CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT

Mule and Black-tailed Deer

Invasive Versus Endemic Species

MOUNTAIN LION MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES FOR Lion DAU L-16

Monitoring Amur Leopards in Southwest Primorskii Krai, Russia

SKIATOOK LAKE MANAGEMENT PLAN

Florida Key deer Odocoileus virginianus clavium

Catlow Valley Redband Trout

Enclosed, please find the 2018 Spotlight Deer Survey Report and Recommendations that we have prepared for your review and records.

MODULE 2. Conservation needs of cheetah and wild dogs and related threats to their survival. Notes:

2017 DEER HUNTING FORECAST

4.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES

RESOURCE BOOKLET N10/4/ENVSO/SP2/ENG/TZ0/XX/T ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS AND SOCIETIES PAPER 2. Wednesday 3 November 2010 (morning) 2 hours

DMU 361 Fremont Deer Management Unit Newaygo, Oceana, N. Muskegon Counties

Fraser River. FISH SURVEY AND MANAGEMENT INFORMATION Jon Ewert - Aquatic Biologist (Hot Sulphur Springs)

Is the lion really the king of the jungle?

FISHERIES BLUE MOUNTAINS ADAPTATION PARTNERSHIP

Blue-tipped Dancer. Summary. Protection Not listed in New York State, not listed federally.

2015 Winnebago System Walleye Report

SELF-GUIDED LEARNING EXPEDITION LIFE SCIENCE. Name GRADE LEVEL: 4 5 TEACHER GUIDE

Cariboo-Chilcotin (Region 5) Mule Deer: Frequently Asked Questions

021 Deer Management Unit

DMU 057 Missaukee County Deer Management Unit

Lotic Breeding Amphibians in the East Bay Regional Park District. Steven Bobzien Ecological Services Coordinator

2008 WMU 360 moose, white tailed deer and mule deer. Section Authors: Robb Stavne, Dave Stepnisky and Mark Heckbert

Wildlife Issues With Oil and Gas Exploration. Peter D. McKone, CWB Senior Project Director

California golden trout: can their warming streams handle cattle grazing and climate change?

Roundabout Feasibility Memorandum

project 1 [ti] Name Address Club .'_ D.St.SS" A?G.I R.3? '!UJ.SS at: B 1MILDLIFE

Copyright 2018 by Jamie L. Sandberg

Controlling Predators to Increase Quail Populations

Transcription:

(Ammospermophilus nelsoni) Legal Status State: Threatened Federal: None Critical Habitat: No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Recovery Planning: Recovery Plan for Upland Species of the San Joaquin Valley (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1998). Notes: No changes to status proposed or anticipated during the permit term. Taxonomy San Joaquin antelope squirrel is considered to be monotypic. It is one of five species of antelope squirrel that occurs in the arid regions of the southwestern United States and Mexico. San Joaquin antelope squirrels have small rounded ears, light-colored striping along the side of the body, relatively short legs and tail. The tail, which is light gray to whitish on the underside, has laterally projecting, thick fringes of hair. San Joaquin antelope squirrels have a body length ranging from 21.8 24.0 centimeters (8.5 9.4 inches) and typically weigh 130 170 grams (4.6 6.0 ounces) (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1998). Distribution General Historically, San Joaquin antelope squirrels were distributed across the western and southern portions of the Tulare Basin, San Joaquin Valley, and the contiguous areas to the west of the upper Cuyama Valley, and on the Carrizo and Elkhorn Plains. They ranged from western Merced County on the northwest, southward along the western side of the San Joaquin Valley to its southern end, and were distributed over the floor of the San Joaquin Valley in Kern County and along the eastern edge of the Valley northward to near Tipton, Tulare County. San Joaquin antelope squirrels occur at elevations ranging from about 50 meters (165 feet) on the San Joaquin Valley floor to about 1,100 meters (3,600 feet) in the Temblor Mountains. The area encompassed by the distribution record prior to cultivation was approximately 1,398,600 hectares (3,456,000 acres) (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1998). 1

Distribution and Occurrences within the Study Area Historical Based on a search of the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB), there is one historical San Joaquin antelope squirrel occurrence (prior to 1990) within the permit area and 78 historical occurrences within the larger study area (California Department of Fish and Game 2012). Recent There are no San Joaquin antelope squirrel occurrences on record from 1990 to present in the plan area and there are 92 occurrences in the study area (California Department of Fish and Game 2012). Substantial populations of San Joaquin antelope squirrel are found in and around Lokern and Elk Hills in western Kern County and on the Carrizo and Elkhorn Plains in eastern San Luis Obispo County. Antelope squirrels have been nearly eliminated from the floor of the Tulare Basin and exist mainly in marginal habitat in the mountainous areas bordering its western edge. The current distribution and trends in spatial distribution has decreased over the years. Recent information suggests that the substantial populations of the species are now limited to two major areas: western Kern County, particularly at Lokern and Elk Hills and Carrizo and Elkhorn Plains, eastern San Luis Obispo County (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1998; California Department of Fish and Game 2005). Smaller populations occur in western Fresno, eastern San Benito County, along the fringe of the San Joaquin Valley between Fresno and Kern Counties, and in isolated areas on the San Joaquin Valley floor (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1998). Natural History Habitat Requirements San Joaquin antelope squirrels inhabit arid annual grassland and shrub communities, including saltbush scrub and Valley sink scrub. They are most numerous in areas with a sparse to moderate cover of shrubs. Areas devoid of shrubs are typically only sparsely inhabited. They require areas free from flooding where they can dig ground burrows in friable soils. In the southern and western San Joaquin Valley, San Joaquin antelope squirrels are associated with open, gently sloping land with saltbush shrubs (Atriplex sp.) and California ephedra (Ephedra californica); however, near Los Banos, Merced County and Mendota, Fresno County, their habitat is mostly devoid of shrubs (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1998). 2

Table 1. Habitat Associations for San Joaquin Antelope Squirrel Land Cover Type Land Cover Use Habitat Designation Habitat Parameters Rationale Annual grasslands, saltbush scrub, Valley sink scrub Breeding, foraging, and denning Primary Requires suitable friable soils in which to dig their burrows for denning and predator avoidance. In areas devoid of shrubs, associated with giant kangaroo rats Presence of burrowing species provides burrows for refugia. Will live in burrow systems created by giant kangaroo rats. Oil Field Breeding, foraging, and denning Primary and secondary Are found in light-density oil fields (<25% ground cover. Less abundant in moderatedensity (25%-75% ground cover developed). Absent from high-density fields (>75% ground cover developed) Population densities in oil fields decrease as development density increases. Sources: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1998 Foraging Requirements San Joaquin antelope squirrels are omnivorous, and the amount and type of food consumed mostly depends upon availability. Green vegetation, fungi, and insects are consumed more often than seeds, even when seeds are relatively abundant. Stalks of filaree (Erodium cicutarium) and red brome (Bromus rubens) are main food plants along with the seeds of shrubs such as ephedra and saltbush. Insects, principally grasshoppers, are eaten regularly when available and provide a source of protein. When seeds and grasshoppers are scarce, the squirrels will eat harvester ants and the ovaries and developing seeds of ephedra (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1998). Reproduction Mating occurs during late winter through early spring (February or March), coinciding with the time of year when green vegetation is present. Females produce one litter per year. Young are born between March and April and are first seen above ground when they are about 30 days of age. Young are weaned beginning in late April through late May. 3

Table 2. Key Seasonal Periods for San Joaquin Antelope Squirrel Jan Feb Mar April May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Breeding Source: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1998 Home Range and Population Density Of the 275,200 hectares (680,000 acres) of extant, uncultivated habitat estimated in 1979, only 41,300 hectares (102,000 acres) were rated fair to good quality, supporting 3 10 squirrels per hectare (1 4 per acre) (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1998), with half the remaining habitat supporting fewer than 1 animal per hectare (NatureServe 2012). The home range of these squirrels on the Elkhorn Plain is 5 20 hectares (5 49 acres), although another study reported a home range of 4.4 hectares (11 acres). Immature males have been observed moving up to 1.3 kilometers (0.8 mile) and up to 0.9 km (0.56 mile) by an adult female (NatureServe 2012). It was also noted that weaned young were still together in late May, and at least some family groups were still together in mid-july (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1998). The range of San Joaquin antelope squirrel most nearly coincides with that of the giant kangaroo rat (Dipodomys ingens) and the short-nosed kangaroo rat, (Dipodomys nitratoides brevinasus) (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1998). Ecological Relationships San Joaquin antelope squirrels are prey for a number of predators, including coyotes (Canis latrans), San Joaquin kit fox (Vulpes macrotis mutica), American badgers (Taxidea taxus), hawks, and snakes. Predation is unlikely to threaten populations of San Joaquin antelope squirrels. However, predation could adversely affect small, isolated populations. Population Status and Trends Global: Imperiled (NatureServe 2012) State: Stable to declining (California Department of Fish and Game 2005) Study Area: Same as above Threats and Environmental Stressors Reasons for decline of the San Joaquin antelope squirrel are attributed primarily to the loss of habitat due to agricultural conversion, urbanization, and petroleum extraction. Habitat loss and fragmentation are also expected to exacerbate the decline of the species. Excessive grazing by livestock may also have long-term 4

effects through the elimination of shrubs and soil erosion resulting from heavy use of rangeland communities. The use of insecticides in agriculture to control insect pests might affect antelope squirrels by temporarily reducing the abundance of insects, an important source of food and moisture during the summer (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1998). Conservation and Management Activities In 1998, a recovery plan for upland species of the San Joaquin Valley was completed that included a recovery strategy for the San Joaquin antelope squirrel (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1998). The 1998 recovery plan s objective was to achieve long-term conservation of this species. San Joaquin antelope squirrels in the two largest populations on the Carrizo Natural Area and in western Kern County should be protected by appropriate land uses and habitat management. Ensuring that habitat is dedicated to conservation objectives will require purchase of title or easement of some parcels and protection of habitat on existing public lands in western Kern County. The following conservation areas provide currently or previously occupied San Joaquin antelope squirrel habitat and should be managed for the long-term survivability of San Joaquin antelope squirrels (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1998). Allensworth Ecological Reserve Carrizo Natural Area Pixley National Wildlife Refuge Western Kern County in the area of the Lokern, Elk Hills, and uplands around McKittrick, Taft, and Maricopa Data Characterization This species has been well studied at as few limited sites. Information of the population and trends at most occupied sites is not well known. Therefore, any estimated range-wide numbers for this species could be underestimated or overestimated, though it is unknown to what degree. Additionally, knowledge of the subspecies behavior and ecology is limited. Management and Monitoring Considerations Management and monitoring considerations for the San Joaquin antelope squirrel is based on the Recovery Plan for Upland Species (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1998) include: 5

Determine habitat management prescriptions for San Joaquin antelope squirrels on the southern San Joaquin Valley floor. Inventory potnetial habitat for San Joaquin antelope squirrels in the Allensworth, Semitropic Ridge, and Kettleman Hills natural areasw, and along the western edge of the Valley between Pleasant Valley, Fresno County, and McKittrick Valley-Lokern Area, Kern County. Predict additional habitat for San Joaquin antelope squirrels at sites representative of their existing geographic range. Develop and implement a population monitoring program for San Joaquin antelope squirrels at sites representative of their existing geographic range. Protect additional habitat for San Joaquin antelope squirrels in the Panoche Region of western Fresno County and eastern San Benito Counties. Protect additional habitat San Joaquin antelope squirrels in western Kern County. Protect additional habitat San Joaquin antelope squirrels in the Semitropic Ridge Natural Area. Reevaluate the status of San Joaquin antelope squirrels within 3 years of the recovery plan approval. Predicted Species Distribution in the Study Area Model Description Primary and Secondary Habitat San Joaquin antelope squirrels are found in areas of sparsely vegetated annual grassland, Valley sink scrub, and saltbush scrub habitats. They are also found in areas of light-density oil fields (<25% ground cover developed). San Joaquin antelope squirrels are known to occur in areas of petroleum development, especially light-density oil fields (<25% ground cover developed). Therefore, these habitats west of Highway 99 were considered to be primaryhabitat for San Joaquin antelope squirrels. Population densities in oil fields decrease as the density of oil development increases (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1998). Medium-density oil fields (25%-75% ground cover developed) were considered suitable secondary habitat for San Joaquin antelope squirrels. It is assumed that San Joaquin antelope squirrels may be present in medium density oil development areas but at low, sporadic populations. San Joaquin antelope squirrels are presumed be absent from areas of high density oil development (>75% ground cover developed). 6

Model Results Figure D-7 shows the modeled primary habitat for San Joaquin antelope squirrels within the Plan Area and the Study Area. CNDDB occurrences of this species fall within the modeled habitat. Literature Cited California Department of Fish and Game. 2011. State and Federally Listed Endangered and Threatened Animals of California. January. Available: http://www.dfg.ca.gov/biogeodata/cnddb/pdfs/teanimals.pdf. Accessed: October 24, 2012. California Department of Fish and Game. 2012. California Natural Diversity Database, RareFind 3, Version 3.1.0. Updated July 1, 2012. Sacramento, CA. NatureServe. 2012. NatureServe Explorer: An Online Encyclopedia of Life [web application]. Version 7.1. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia. Available: <http://www.natureserve.org/explorer>. Accessed: August 22, 2012. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1998. Recovery Plan for Upland Species of the San Joaquin Valley, California. Portland, OR. Region 1. 7

B a k e r s f i e l d C o n s e r v a t i o n P l a n W hi t e R i v e r K:\Projects_1\City_of_Bakersfield\00036_12_BakersfieldHCP\mapdoc\Species_Model_Figures\D_7_san_joaquin_antelope_squirrel_figure.mxd hw 2/1/2013 M O N T E R E Y S A N L U I S O B I S P O S a n River / Creek J ua n Cr e e k Major Roadway County Boundary HCP Study Area HCP Permit Area San Joaquin Antelope Squirrel CNDDB Occurrence (Presumed Extant) Primary Habitat Secondary Habitat Source: City of Bakersfield 2012; CNDDB 2012 0 5 10 15 Miles UV 58 K I N G S 5 T E M B L O R R A N G E C A L I E N T E R A N G E UV 33 Lost Hills S A N T A B A R B A R A S I E R R A M A D R E R A N G E Cuyama Riv er Buttonwillow UV 43 UV 119 UV 99 Taft P o s o C Wasco V E N T U R A r e e k Delano Shafter Bakersfield S A N E M I G D I O M O U N T A I N S Oildale K E R N T U L A R E K E R N Lamont Arvin P o s o C r e e k UV 58 K er n R i v e r Bear Valley Springs S I E R R A V A D A N E UV 178 T E H A C H A P I M O U N T A I N S Figure D-7 San Joaquin Antelope Squirrel Modeled Habitat