Targeted Wild Pig Feeder by WPF, Inc.

Similar documents
SP-472 AUGUST Feral Hog Population Growth, Density and Harvest in Texas

WILD HOGS IN MISSISSIPPI

Livestock Concerns with Feral Hogs. Aaron Sumrall Newton Co. Extension Agent

Invasive Species. 1. What do you think might happen if a species is moved out of its native habitat and into a new environment?

Howell Woods Orientation and Safety Open Book Test

Section 1 Basic Pig Biology. Section 1 Basic Pig Biology

Annual Report Ecology and management of feral hogs on Fort Benning, Georgia.

FERAL HOG EXPANSION 2/21/2011. Population Dynamics and Distribution of Feral Hogs. Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences

FERALS IN THE CLASSROOM. Designed by the Institute for Applied Ecology University of Canberra Invasive Animals CRC

WILDLIFE DAMAGE Publication Series WDS September 2007

Biologist s Answer: What are your goals? Deer Management. Define goals, objectives. Manager s Question: Should I cull or shoot spikes?

Coyotes: Wild and free on the urban interface. Dana Sanchez Extension Wildlife Specialist

Deer Management in Maryland. Brian Eyler Deer Project Leader Maryland DNR

Implementing a Successful Deer Management Program. Kip Adams Certified Wildlife Biologist Dir. of Ed. & Outreach Quality Deer Management Association

LEAPS BOUNDS. Growing up hunting as a kid in New Hampshire, I didn t. by Dan Bergeron

San Diego Feral Pig Eradication

Upland Wildlife Habitat Management (645) EQIP Program Sheet Feral Swine Trapping. MI-EQIP11-1

Policy Position Statement on Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) and hybrids in Ireland and Northern Ireland

CHECKS AND BALANCES. OVERVIEW Students become managers of a herd of animals in a paper-pencil, discussionbased

Coyotes (Canis latrans) in Florida: the Good, the Bad, & the Ugly

Faster, better, cheaper: Transgenic Salmon. How the Endangered Species Act applies to genetically

Fun Facts History of the Pig Distribution Management Wild Pig Biology Fort Benning Regulations How to Hunt Wild Pigs?

SPOTLIGHT DEER SURVEY YO RANCHLANDS LANDOWNERS ASSOCIATION ±10,400 ACRES KERR COUNTY

Coyotes. The coyote, considered by many as a symbol of the Old West, now resides

South Carolina s Growing Wild Hog Problem: Recommendations for Management and Control

Management History of the Edwards Plateau

Invasive Species. Grade Levels. Introduction. This activity is intended for grades 9 12.

Invasive Versus Endemic Species

CHEETAH PROJECT Cheetah Conservation Fund. Interviewers name Date

TITLE 35. OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD, AND FORESTRY CHAPTER 15. ANIMAL INDUSTRY SUBCHAPTER 34. FERAL SWINE

Status Report on the Yellowstone Bison Population, August 2016 Chris Geremia 1, Rick Wallen, and P.J. White August 17, 2016

Enclosed, please find the 2018 Spotlight Deer Survey Report and Recommendations that we have prepared for your review and records.

City of Galena 2017 Deer Hunting Survey

Wholesale Cuts of a Market Pig

Texas A&M Natural Resources Institute Wild Pig Outreach Program FAQ

BIOLOGY, LEGAL STATUS, CONTROL MATERIALS, AND DIRECTIONS FOR USE

The History of a Central Texas Feral Hog Management Program

Wildlife Management. Wildlife Management. Geography 657

Reduction in Biological Diversity Section 4.1 p Section 4.3 p

Environmental Change and its Effects

THE WOLF WATCHERS. Endangered gray wolves return to the American West

Chronic Wasting Disease in Southeast Minnesota. Drs. Michelle Carstensen and Lou Cornicelli Preston Public Meeting December 18, 2018

This game has been adapted from SECONDARY PROJECT WILD 1983, 1985

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE TRAINING COURSE ON THE SURVEILLANCE OF WILDLIFE DISEASES AND THE ROLE OF HUNTERS

Farm Wildlife Management and Food Plots

Invasive Versus Endemic Species

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion

Best Management Practices. for Trapping Badger in the United States

Street Edmonton, AB T6K 1T8. Alberta Fish and Game Association (AFGA) Position On Game Farming In Alberta February 2004

I believe it s safe to say that the good ole days for whitetail hunting are right now.

PREDATOR CONTROL AND DEER MANAGEMENT: AN EAST TEXAS PERSPECTIVE

Coyote Canis latrans

"Oh! Deer! & Limiting Factors" adapted from Project Wild Mr. Mark Musselman Audubon at the Francis Beidler Forest

Life history Food Distribution Management... 98

Objectives. Summary. Background

Bison: National Treasure or Pernicious Vector?

Deer Management Unit 127

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS. Court File No. A Petitioners, Respondents.

BTSF. Better Training for Safer Food Initiative. Wild Boar ecology

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

NATURAL CONTROLS OF POPULATIONS: 3 CASE STUDIES

Wild boar magament in relation to ASF

Michigan Predator-Prey Project Phase 1 Preliminary Results and Management Recommendations. Study Background

Making Sense of Selective Buck Harvest

Wild Wapiti Wild Wapiti activities are directly tied to the third spread - pages 5 and 6 of Our Wetland Project.

African Swine fever in wild boar in Belgium

Feral Hogs. in Texas Mark E. Mapston District Supervisor Texas Cooperative Extension * Wildlife Services

WILD BOAR ECOLOGY, BEHAVOUR AND POPULATION MANAGEMENT PREVENTING CONTAGIOUS DISEASES IN LITHUANIA

Island Fox A POPULATION IN TROUBLE T E A C H E R. Activity Overview

5 th Grade Science Pre-assessment Organisms & Environments Unit 5 KEY

RANCHING Wildlife. Texas White-Tailed Deer 2017 Hunting Forecast

MOLESWORTH BOVINE TB CONTROL OPERATION (YEAR 1)

Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Long history in ecology

DMU 065 Ogemaw County Deer Management Unit

ESRM 350 Consumptive and Non- Consumptive Exploitation of Wildlife

October 14, University of Missouri Extension

EU Strategy for ASF OIE-CIC-FACE TRAINING COURSE 18 DECEMBER 2017

DMU 452 Northern Multi-County Deer Management Unit

ESRM 350 Consumptive and Non- Consumptive Exploitation of Wildlife

CWD 102 for Managers. Chronic Wasting Disease - the beginnings Colorado Univ. of Wyoming

MISSISSIPPI COMMISSION ON WILDLIFE, FISHERIES, AND PARKS MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE, FISHERIES, AND PARKS

Controlling Predators to Increase Quail Populations

FERAL HOG PROJECT ACCOMPLISHMENTS March 2008-February 2010

Managing Wildlife Populations

Managing Encounters Between Humans and Coyotes. Guidelines and Information

Deer and Bison Artiodactyla

DMU 487 Northern Multi-County Deer Management Unit

Inshore wrasse pot fishery What are the issues?

Integrated Pest Management for Home Gardeners and Landscape Professionals LIFE CYCLE, BIOLOGY, AND

African swine fever in wild boar in the Czech Republic

Regents Biology LAB. NATURAL CONTROLS OF POPULATIONS

Controlled Take (Special Status Game Mammal Chapter)

48 7 ( ; $ 6 :, / ' /, ) (

UMUKARIKARI AERIAL BOVINE TB CONTROL OPERATION

Pork Outlook. Professor of Agricultural Economics. Midwest/Great Plains & Western Outlook Conference Indianapolis, August 2007

2009 Update. Introduction

DMU 057 Missaukee County Deer Management Unit

Biology B / Sanderson!

Long-tailed Weasel. Mustela frenata. Other common names. Introduction. None

Transcription:

Targeted Wild Pig Feeder by WPF, Inc. There are only two types of people in Texas, those who have pigs and those who re goin to get em. Is this an exaggeration or an overstatement? Texas A&M University s AgriLife Extension program has devoted years and has conducted several research studies. They are one of the leading research institutes regarding the feral hog/wild pig (Sus scrofa). They have published numerous studies and continuous research, to name a few Feral Hogs in Texas, Feral Hog Laws and Regulations in Texas, Feral Hog Population Growth, Density and Harvest in Texas. For our purposes of analysis and discussion, our projections of the wild pig severity, growth and control, will be based primarily upon the efforts of Texas A&M University s research and publications. Introduction Wild pigs by nature are free-ranging opportunistic, adaptable, non-indigenous omnivores. They are intelligent, prolific and are very destructive. When left to their own resources in search of food, they have been known to cause extensive damage of over billions of dollars and the spread of multiple diseases. It has been acknowledge by the USDA, June 0 that the wild pig carries over 0 diseases and 7 parasites which can be transmitted to crops, people, pets, livestock and wildlife. If their rooting is left unchecked or undirected, substantial damage will result in neighborhoods, farm land, crops, and ecosystems. It has been estimated that damages in Texas alone are over $00 million annually per Texas Department of Agriculture and $. billion nationally. Not only will wild pigs feast on field crops such as corn, milo, rice, peanuts, hay, turf and wheat - there s not a crop they won t eat, but have been known to be very efficient predators as well. They will prey on young livestock and small animals. A hungry adult wild pig is an aggressive, destructive and sometimes very capable predator. And, equally important, other than man, have NO natural or significant predators themselves. WPF, Inc., PO Box 87, St. Petersburg, FL 7

Disease Reservoirs Considerable research has been done on parasite loads and disease potential of wild pigs. Wild pigs have been found to be potential reservoirs for domestic livestock diseases, among which are hog chlorea, brucellosis, trichinosis, foot and mouth disease, African swine fever, and pseudorabies. Hogs have been found to test positive for leptospirosis and areas of heavy hog use have been found to harbor higher concentrations of fecal coliform bacteria. The potential of transmission of disease to other wildlife, livestock, and man does exist, as the documentation of the loss of 0 head of cattle in Dimmit County, Texas in 989 due to transmission of pseudorabies by feral hogs (Turman, ADC, and USDA) would indicate. Reproduction What s being said by those that have been around wild pigs - out of piglets born, thirteen will survive. Wild pigs are prolific. They have the highest reproduction of any hoofed animal, capable of breeding in as little as six months of age; their gestation is about days. Normally, a sow will have on an average litter size of four to six but have been known to have under ideal conditions as many as ten to twelve. While capable of producing two litters per year, research has shown the majority of sows have only one per year. Young may be born throughout the year with peak production in the early spring. The young are born with a : male to female sex ratio. Wild pigs generally travel in family groups called sounders, comprised generally of two sows and their young. Mature adult boars are usually solitary, keeping to themselves, only joining a herd to breed. Population and Growth Texas A&M University's AgriLife Extension service conducts wild pig research. Mark Tyson, from the project, said that studies indicate that there are between.8 and. million wild pigs in Texas. Some 79% of the state's land mass is a suitable habitat for them, and they have infiltrated almost every county. Tyson said that as things stand, the number of wild pigs in Texas is predicted to grow by 6% annually, roughly doubling in five years. There are other estimates as high as tripling. On an average population estimate of.6 million, Texas wild pig population will increase to - 7. million, and that study was completed almost THREE years ago. The leading pig biologist, Dr. Jack Mayer was quoted August 0 in Huffington Post of saying There could be up to 8 million. What s today s estimate? The average feral hog density in Texas ranged from.-. hogs/square mile from reported studies. By multiplying the density estimate to the total potential suitable feral hog habitat, we estimated the number of feral hogs statewide to be between.8 and. million, with the average being.6 million. Feral Hog Population Growth, Density and Harvest in Texas, August 0 WPF, Inc., PO Box 87, St. Petersburg, FL 7

U.S. Distribution of Wild Pig by County - 0. The following table illustrates a given average population of feral hogs, an even sex ratio, levels of annual population growth and harvest, the model indicates growth or no growth over five years. As annual population harvest increases, annual population growth decreases. Initial Population of Feral Hogs Annual Population Growth Rate Annual Population Harvest Rate Five Year Population Increase,600,000 8% 0% 8,68,000,600,000 % % 6,6,000,600,000 6% 8%,,000,600,000 % %,8,000 Five Year Outcome. times. times.0 times.6 times,600,000 0% 66% 0 No population growth WPF, Inc., PO Box 87, St. Petersburg, FL 7

. The following figure - indicates areas in green which is suitable habitat for feral hogs, comprising 79% of the land mass in Texas. Control Duane Kraemer, a professor of veterinary physiology and pharmacology at Texas A&M University, and his team have discovered a promising birth control compound. Now all they have to do is figure out a way to get wild hogs, and only wild hogs, to ingest it. Nobody believes that can be done, he says. Tyler Campbell, a wildlife biologist with the USDA s National Wildlife Research Center at Texas A&M - Kingsville, and Justin Foster, a research coordinator for Texas Parks and Wildlife, are confident there must be a workable poison to kill wild hogs though, once again, the delivery system is the more vexing issue. Smithsonian, A Plague of Pigs in Texas, January 0. The Lubbock Avalanche-Journal reports that to keep the invasive species in check, Texas would have to cull nearly 66 percent of the animals to prevent them from breeding. That is a very tall order. In a 00 survey taken by the state s landowners, trapping and hunting methods accounted to 7,66 pigs taken in that year, amounting to roughly 9 percent of the population. WPF, Inc., PO Box 87, St. Petersburg, FL 7

Texas A&M AgriLife has published August 0 the same findings that population reduction measures need to increase drastically, up to 66% of the population will need to be removed annually on a long-term basis (i.e., five years or more) to reach a stable population. The control methods for the growing population have varied from hunting, trapping, snaring, dogging, harvesting and fencing. None specifically or all inclusively have had any significant impact! Texas highest removal estimates have only been 9%. Based on.6 million pigs, that s almost an additional million pigs annually needing to be eradicated to stay even, (66% - 9% = 7%;.7 x.6 million = @ million). The population has increased and become even more wide spread, and not just in Texas. Currently, wild pigs are reported in 9 states, as far north as Michigan and southerly as the Florida Keys. Without a more aggressive methodology and systemic approach, the problem will only increase. Projections Most published U.S. estimates of the wild pig population are approximately million of which half are in Texas. This is an estimate; no agency has any hard numbers. However, that figure was from 0. With reasonable assumption and understanding on how prolific the wild pig is, the estimate could be twice as many today! Their numbers have grown, their range has expanded and their destructive behavior goes unabated. Texas may have the most aggressive program(s) regarding the eradication of the wild pig snaring, fencing, dogging, aerial shoots, harvesting, trapping, and hunting. Still, the highest removal is only 9%. California and Florida (two and three respectively in pig population) are now witnessing the same pig growth, the same destruction of crops, farm land, and ecosystems. If the 66% eradication mark is to be met, and assuming the other states are as aggressive and as successful as Texas, close to million pigs need to be harvested, about,00 per day! That does NOT reduce the population ONLY keeps it even. It is not unrealistic to expect a necessary kill off rate of 0,000 a day for any true appreciable reduction. The following illustrations are population growth of the feral pig and comparing them with a field deer. NO COMPARISON! The feral pig is the most prolific of any hoofed animal. WPF, Inc., PO Box 87, St. Petersburg, FL 7

One Sow - One Litter per Year** Five Year Growth Extrapolation Litter Size: Year Litter Size: 6 Litter Size: 8 6 8 6 6 6 6 6 6,96,096,0 7,776,768 Growth Line: versus 6 Growth Line: 6 versus 8 9,000,000 8,000 7,776,768 0,000 7,000,000 6,000,000 Litter Size,000 Litter Size 6,000 0,000 Litter Size 6,000 Litter Size 8 0,000,000,96,000 06 6 6 6,0 6 6 7,776,000,096 08 6 ** One Sow can have litters every months and can average up to in a litter! ** Gestation time is approximately days, and a sow can start reproducing at 6 months of age! WPF, Inc., PO Box 87, St. Petersburg, FL 7

Reproduction Comparison: Deer versus Wild Pig Year Free Range Deer* Wild Pig* Reproduction: Deer versus Wild Pig 7 6,000 8,000 6,9, 8,000,,000 0,000 Comparison: Deer vs. Wild Pig Deer** Versus Wild Pig Twice/year Potential Number of Offspring? to Wild Pig 6,000,000 How often can They Reproduct? Once/year Deer 8,000,9,000 6 to 0 7 8 6 What is the Age of Reproductive Maturity? Avg. years 6 months How long of a Gestation Period? Apx. 00 days Apx. days What is the Potential Offspring in Years? deer versus, Wild Pigs!, *Optimal breeding for Deer (/ yr.) and Wild Pig (6/6 mos.) **per the University of Michigan, http://www.biokids.umich.edu/ Conclusion Two major concerns about feral swine shared by professional wildlife managers and livestock officials as well as livestock producers are: () that feral swine are known to be very adaptable, intelligent having a high reproductive capability with little or no predators and, because of their feeding habits and behavior, can significantly impact wild ecosystems; and () That feral swine are known disease carriers. Houston, we do have a problem, and time is critical! WPF, Inc., PO Box 87, St. Petersburg, FL 7