The Red & Blue Nation & 4 election outcomes Partisanship Ideology Dem. & Rep. States: & 4 8 Outcome Source: Dave Leip s Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections http://www.uselectionatlas.org/results/
Partisanship Definition & measurement Direction versus intensity Origins of partisanship Demographic groups and partisanship Effects of partisanship direction Effects of partisanship intensity Changes in partisanship Party Identification Long term preference for one party over the other Measuring Party Identification: First Question NES Generally speaking, do you usually think of yourself as a Republican, a Democrat, and Independent, or what? 3 broad groups Democrats independents Republicans
Measuring Party Identification: Second Question NES Would you call yourself a strong (Republican/Democrat) or a not very strong (Republican/Democrat)? Do you think of yourself as closer to the Republican party or to the Democratic party? (NES - National Election Studies) Measuring Party Identification 7 specific groups strong Republicans weak Republicans independents leaning toward Republicans pure independents independents leaning toward Democrats weak Democrats strong Democrats Party Identification, 4 18 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 St. Dem Wk. Dem Ind- Dem Indep Ind-RepWk-Rep St-Rep Source: National Election Studies
Party Identification - Collapsed 5 45 4 35 3 25 15 1 5 Dem. All indep. Rep. Dem & leaners Pure indep. Rep & leaners 4 NES Partisan Direction Democrats versus Republicans Partisan Intensity Intensity of partisanship strong partisans (Dem + Rep) weak partisans (Dem + Rep) leaning independents pure independents
Party Identification - Intensity 35 3 25 15 1 5 Pure Leaner Weak Strong Independents Partisans Origins of Partisanship Childhood Political eras Intergenerational Partisanship Child in 1982 as Young Adult Party of Parent (1965) Dem. Indep. Rep. Dem. 51% 27% 1% Indep. 39 51 46 Rep. 1 22 44 295 192 211 Source: Paul Allen Beck & Marjorie Randon Hershey, Party Politics In America, 9 th edition (New York: Longman, 1), p. 121.
Who Are the Partisans Demographic groups associated with each party Reasons Race and Party Identification 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 1 White Black Latino Notes: leaners = partisans, NES V =.27** Income and Party Identification 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 1 NES Under $25k $25-$49K $5-$94K $95K + V =.18**
1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 1 NES Religion and Party Identification Protestant Catholic Jew V =.15** Age and Party Identification 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 1 18-29 3-39 4-59 6 plus NES V =.14** 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 1 Gender and Party Identification Men Women V =.8** Women 54% Democrat - Men 46% Democrat = 8 point gap NES
Effects of Partisanship Shapes vote Shapes attitudes 1 Influence Of Party On 4 & 8 Presidential Elections 8 6 4 1 8 6 4 Kerry Bush Nader Democrats Independents Republicans Source: Exit Polls Obama McCain Other Partisanship and Government Spending 7 6 5 4 3 1 reduce same increase Values are percent of each partisan group with specific attitude V =.38**
Partisanship and Capital Punishment 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 1 favor oppose V =.17** Partisanship and Gays in Military 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 1 Yes No V =.15** 6 5 4 3 1 Partisanship and Legal Abortion Never Restrict Always V =.16**
Effects of Intensity of Partisanship Partisan Intensity and Interest 6 5 4 3 little some a lot 1 indep leaner weak strong Source: NES V =.29** Partisan Intensity and Knowledge 6 5 4 3 None One Two plus 1 indep leaner weak strong Correctly identify: Blair, Lott, Rehnquist, Reno V =.13**
Partisan Intensity and Voted 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 1 indep lean weak strong Didn't Vote Voted V =.23** Changes in Partisanship Democrats v. Republicans More independents Other trends Defections in voting Split-ticket voting Differences in parties Changes in Party Preferences 7 6 5 4 3 1 1952 1956 Partisans include independent leaners, NES 196 1964 1968 1972 1976 198 1984 1988 1992 1996 4 Dem. Rep.
Changes: Whites v. Blacks 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 1 1952 195649 196 1964 1968 1972 1976 198 1984 1988 1992 1996 4 Data are percent Democrat (including leaners) in NES Whites Blacks Changes: South v. Nonsouth 8 7 6 5 4 3 1 1952 1956 196 1964 1968 1972 1976 198 1984 1988 1992 1996 4 Data are percent Democrat (including leaners) NES South Nonsouth Rise in Independents 45 4 35 3 25 15 1 5 1952 196 1968 1976 1984 1992 Indep. Leaner Weak Strong
Split-Ticket Voting 35 3 25 15 1 5 1952 1956 196 1964 1968 1972 1976 198 1984 1988 1992 1996 4 Note: Split-ticket vote is between President and House Public: Important Differences in What Two Parties Stand For 8 7 6 5 4 3 1 1952 196 NES surveys 1964 1968 1972 1976 198 1984 1988 1992 1996 4 Yes Which Party Better Job 6 5 4 3 1 Health Care Economy Rights Iraq Housing Taxes Corruption Moral Immig. Terrorism Dem. Same Rep. Source: November 7 Gallup/USA Today poll
Why? Ideology Philosophy about government Liberals v. conservatives Ideological identities Use of ideology Match between partisanship & ideology Liberal v. Conservative Economic issues Business Crime Social issues Military
Ideological Self-Placement NES Here is a 7-point scale on which the political views that people might hold are arranged from extremely liberal to extremely conservative. Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven t you thought much about this? Extremely Slightly Slightly Extremely Liberal Lib. Lib. Moderate Conser. Conser. Conservative 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Trends in Ideological Self- Placement 4 35 3 25 15 1 5 Lib. Mod. Cons. DK 1972 1976 198 1984 1988 1992 1996 4 NES surveys Ideology & Government Role Liberal Moderate Conserv. Fewer services 9% 15% 44% Between 19% 34% 27% More services 71% 51% 29% Number of cases 216 273 351 4 NES Cramer s V =.293**
Ideology & International Policy Liberal Moderate Conserv. Diplomacy 67% 4% 22% Between 29 29 Military 12 31 5 Number of cases 226 268 354 4 NES Cramer s V =.283** Ideology & Abortion Liberal Moderate Conserv. Not permit 6% 8% % Limited 31 52 52 No restrictions 63 41 28 Number of cases 9 252 347 4 NES Cramer s V =.223** Partisanship and Ideology 8 7 6 5 4 3 1 Entries are percent of partisan group holding specific ideology liberal moderate conservative V =.39**
Ideological Realignment Abramowitz v. Fiorina What Should You Know? Partisan basis of recent elections Partisanship Definition & measurement Direction & intensity Origins & composition Effects Ideology Ideological realignment