Mountain Caribou Recovery Implementation Plan Progress Board. Annual Report on Activities and Accomplishments of the Mountain Caribou Recovery

Similar documents
Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations

Mountain Caribou Recovery Implementation Plan. Predator/Prey Component. Terms of Reference

April Nisga a Fisheries & Wildlife Department

NEWS RELEASE. Harvest allocation ensures certainty for hunting sector

PETITION TO THE COURT

Findings of the Alaska Board of Game BOG

PROVINCIAL CARIBOU RECOVERY PROGRAM. Discussion Paper

Findings of the Alaska Board of Game BOG

Critical Aspects of Mountain Caribou Biology

2010 Wildlife Management Unit 510 moose

MOUNTAIN CARIBOU INTERACTIONS WITH WOLVES AND MOOSE IN CENTRAL BRITISH COLUMBIA

Controlled Take (Special Status Game Mammal Chapter)

1) Increase the deer population to 475,000 (mule, 150,000;

RE: Request for Audit of Ineligible Federal Aid Grants to Alaska Department of Fish & Game for Support of Predator Management

Copyright 2018 by Jamie L. Sandberg

Cariboo-Chilcotin (Region 5) Mule Deer: Frequently Asked Questions

Kootenay (Region 4) Mule Deer: Frequently Asked Questions

FINAL REPORT. Reducing the Threat of Predation by Wolves within the Prophet Caribou Range

make people aware of the department s actions for improving the deer population monitoring system,

Community Involvement in Recovering Woodland Caribou Populations: Yukon Success Stories

White-Tailed Deer Management FAQ

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

2017 LATE WINTER CLASSIFICATION OF NORTHERN YELLOWSTONE ELK

Peace Region Wildlife Regulations Proposed Changes for Comment ( )

GAO. ENDANGERED SPECIES Caribou Recovery Program Has Achieved Modest Gains. Report to the Honorable Larry E. Craig, U.S. Senate

REVELSTOKE MOUNTAIN CARIBOU RECOVERY:

White-tailed Deer: A Review of the 2010 Provincially Coordinated Hunting Regulation

Wolf Management in Alaska with an Historic Perspective

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Feasibility Study on the Reintroduction of Gray Wolves to the Olympic Peninsula

Meeting in Support of Species at Risk Act Listing Process for Lower Fraser River and Upper Fraser River White Sturgeon

Mining & Petroleum Focus Group Southern Rocky Mountain Management Plan. Synopsis of Focus Group Key Issues

PRESENTATION TO THE BRITISH COLUMBIA LEGISALTIVE STANDING COMMITTEE ON FINANCE September 26, 2013

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion

Big Game Allocation Policy Sub-Committee Recommendations to AGPAC

REBOUND. on the. It was the winter of 2000/2001, and it seemed like the snow

Recommendations for Predator-Prey Management to Benefit the Recovery of Mountain Caribou in British Columbia. 31 March 2009

Staff, Organizations Directly Affected (including but not limited to):

Mule and Black-tailed Deer

Audit of Compliance with Reporting Requirements

Sublette County WPLI Advisory Committee Meeting Summary April 5, 2017 Pinedale, WY

The Intended Consequences of Wildlife Allocations in British Columbia

2012 Wildlife Studies

Jeffrey M. Ver Steeg Colorado Parks and Wildlife. December 14, 2016

2010 Mountain Caribou Census CENTRAL SELKIRK MOUNTAINS

Regents Biology LAB. NATURAL CONTROLS OF POPULATIONS

Questionnaire for Aboriginal Traditional Knowledge Interviews on Boreal Caribou LONG VERSION

Nalcor Energy Lower Churchill Project, Environmental Effects Monitoring Program 2017 Mealy Mountains Herd (MMH) Caribou

ALBERTA WILDERNESS ASSOCIATION. Hunting, Trapping, and Fishing

Hunting, Fishing, Recreational Shooting, and Wildlife Conservation Opportunities and Coordination with States, Tribes, and Territories

Nalcor Energy Lower Churchill Project, Environmental Effects Monitoring Program 2017 Red Wine Mountains Herd (RWMH) Caribou

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE FIELD STAFF RESPONSE FOR COUGAR INFORMATION AND CONFLICT SITUATIONS

FWCP External Projects Delivered by Stakeholders and First Nations

2008 WMU 106 mule deer

0-406 White Sturgeon Questionnaire FC Habitat Use and Selection of Mule Deer Bucks in the Southern Interior Fraser River Basis

Developing a programme to make Taranaki predator-free

Northern Yellowstone Cooperative Wildlife Working Group 2012 Annual Report (October 1, 2012-September 30, 2012) Member Agencies

Observations of Deer and Wolves during the 2017 Moose Survey

NATURAL CONTROLS OF POPULATIONS: 3 CASE STUDIES

Canadian Ski Patrol System Strategic Plan Canadian Ski Patrol System Mission, Vision and Focus

FIVE YEAR SUMMARY OF EAST REGION WILDLIFE RESEARCH PROGRAM

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PENTICTON COUNCIL REPORT. DATE: 9 th January 2012 RES:

Mule deer in the Boundary Region: Proposed research and discussion

Findings and Guidelines Wednesday, March 12, 2003 Page 1

Comment Letter 1 for Item 5

Fish and Wildlife Program

REINTRODUCTION OF PILEATED GIBBONS (Hylobates pileatus) TO THE ANGKOR PROTECTED FOREST, SIEM REAP, CAMBODIA

Monitoring Amur Leopards in Southwest Primorskii Krai, Russia

APPENDIX 2.1 Lake Sturgeon - Mitigation and Enhancement

Biology B / Sanderson!

Species at Risk. Provincial Government Overview. September 13 rd, Kendra Morgan, R.P.Bio.

Chapter 635 Division 44 Oregon Fish and Wildlife Commission March 18, 2016 Salem, Oregon

A. PURPOSE B. BACKGROUND

Alberta Conservation Association 2016/17 Project Summary Report. Primary ACA staff on project: Stefanie Fenson, Jeff Forsyth and Jon Van Dijk

Two distinctive caribou types share Labrador s landscape

2010 Wildlife Management Unit 501 moose and deer

Big Game Survey Results

Project on the evaluation of the human dimensions of the target audiences regarding Eastern wolves conservation in La Mauricie National Park of

2015 Deer Population Goal Setting

Fishery Improvement Projects

SIERRA LEGAL DEFENCE FUND

Planning for tennis in your Local Government Area. A resource from Tennis Australia

Graphing population size daily Review Deer: Predation or Starvation

Management of Canada Geese

2012 Kootenay-Boundary Mule Deer Management Plan: Outline and Background Information

2008 WMU 360 moose, white tailed deer and mule deer. Section Authors: Robb Stavne, Dave Stepnisky and Mark Heckbert

ALTERNATIVE DEER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR GAME MANAGEMENT UNITS. 12A, 12B, 13A, 13B, 16A, 45A, 45B, 45C, and White-tailed Deer Units

[Docket No. FWS R2 ES ; FXES FF02ENEH00] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Mexican Wolf Draft Recovery

Monday, November 21, 2011

Observations of Wolf and Deer during the 2015 Moose Survey

County Donegal Public Participation Network Work Plan

Monitoring Asian Elephants and Mitigating Human-Elephant Conflict in the Core Landscape of the Southern/Eastern Cardamom Mountains, Cambodia

Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Document ARLIS Uniform Cover Page

Effects of Sage-grouse Hunting in Nevada. Nevada Board of Wildlife Commissioners August 13, 2011

ALBERTA FISH & GAME ASSOCIATION 2015 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING PASSED RESOLUTIONS FEBRUARY 21, 2015

Dauphin Lake Fishery. Status of Walleye Stocks and Conservation Measures

POLICY DOCUMENT: SAPA

Minnesota Deer Population Goals

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SUMMARY OF COUGAR POPULATION MODEL AND EFFECTS OF LETHAL CONTROL

GENERAL RESOLUTION NUMBER G

Transcription:

Mountain Caribou Recovery Implementation Plan Progress Board Annual Report on Activities and Accomplishments of the Mountain Caribou Recovery 2013-14 Prepared by: Mountain Caribou Recovery Implementation Plan Progress Board October, 2014 1

Background On October 16, 2007, government announced the Mountain Caribou Recovery Implementation Plan (MCRIP), developed in consultation with and supported by the forest industry, commercial and public recreation sectors, environmental sector representatives, and First Nations. The goal of the MCRIP is to halt the decline of the mountain caribou population within seven years for each planning unit and to recover mountain caribou to 1995 population levels (2500 animals) across the mountain caribou range within 20 years in those planning units with more than 10 animals. One of the management actions within the MCRIP was to institute a cross-sector progress board to monitor the effectiveness of recovery actions. The Progress Board meets annually to provide comments and recommendations on government delivery of actions necessary to achieve government s MCRIP recovery objectives. The Progress Board met August 22, 2014 via conference call for a briefing on MCRIP management activities undertaken in 2013/14. A copy of the briefing report is attached. The meeting was attended by Archie MacDonald (Council of Forest Industries), Joe Scott (Mountain Caribou Project), Trish Drinkle (BC Snowmobile Federation), Pierre Dion (BC Snowmobile Federation), Donegal Wilson (BC Snowmobile Federation), Jim Hackett (Interior Lumber Manufacturer s Association), Wilf Pfleiderer (BC Wildlife Federation), Dave Butler (Heli-Cat Canada) and David Moore (Heli-Cat Canada). The call was also attended by MCRIP staff, including Steve Gordon, Darcy Peel (currently representing Environment Canada while on Interchange) and Chris Ritchie. This report summarizes comments and recommendations from the Progress Board at the meeting on August 22, 2014. A recurring theme in discussion of activities conducted in 2013/14 was to take a more herdspecific view in determining management needs and possible solutions. Also, prior to deploying a tool that has shown some promise at contributing to the MCRIP recovery goals, to closely examine the scientific information and advice to increase confidence such actions will provide similar benefit in other areas. 2

RECOVERY ACTION #1: PROTECT 2.2 MILLION HECTARES OF MOUNTAIN CARIBOU RANGE FROM LOGGING AND ROAD BUILDING Since 2007, approximately 2.2 million ha of caribou habitat has been protected from logging and road building. Guidelines have been developed to manage impacts to habitat from mineral exploration and helicopter and snow-cat skiing infrastructure activities. There has been limited activity on habitat protection in 2013/14. However, discussion has been initiated with the Forest Practices Board to examine the amount of tree removal that has occurred in areas designated for legal caribou habitat protection (i.e. Ungulate Winter Range or Wildlife Habitat Areas) Comments from Progress Board: The Progress Board expressed an interest in seeing the results of the examination prior to final editing. 1. Progress Board was generally satisfied with activity in this area. RECOVERY ACTION #2: MANAGE HUMAN RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES Since 2007, approximately 1.0 million ha of caribou habitat has been excluded from recreational snowmobile use. Stewardship Management Agreements (SMAs) have been signed with snowmobile clubs in 3 regions. The SMA for areas in the Cariboo Region expired in 2013 and was to be renewed. SMAs in the Thompson Region expire in 2014 and will be reviewed and renewed with possible revisions. A compliance monitoring and enforcement program for areas closed to recreational snowmobile use continues. MOUs have been signed with major heli- and cat-ski operators to ensure data and monitoring results are submitted to government. There is a moratorium on new commercial recreation tenures. Public Recreation Comments from Progress Board: Providing effective communication should be continued, including outreach to snowmobilers living in Alberta. Compliance monitoring and enforcement needs to continue. The monitoring protocol needs to account for authorized sledding tracks (e.g,. trapline trails). Accountability for closure contravention needs to be applied to the actual offending parties. Situations where areas are closed to snowmobile use but available for logging are an on-going concern that needs to be resolved. 1. MCRIP should continue to share the results of patrols including evidence of noncompliance with clubs and associations. An effort should be made to improve the quantification of monitoring results to permit a more accurate description of problem 3

areas (e.g. omit permitted users like trappers) and to enable trend assessment in the future. 2. Continue work to resolve circumstances where caribou habitat is closed to sledding but remains available to logging. 3. A method should be developed to periodically examine areas closed for recreational snowmobile use to assess use by caribou and the value of closures in meeting MCRIP recovery goals. Commercial Recreation Comments from Progress Board: Results from the third-party compliance audit is of keen interest to Progress Board members. Progress Board Recommendation: 1. Continue work on the third party audit RECOVERY ACTION #3: MANAGE PREDATOR POPULATIONS Since 2007, trapping and hunting season on wolves and cougar have been modified to encourage removing these predators near caribou habitat. Wolves are monitored using aerial surveys or radio telemetry to assess pack home ranges. The University of Victoria graduate student will defend her thesis on predation risk project in the fall Comments from Progress Board: Any predator management initiatives need to be informed by an examination of local predator-prey relationships. This includes the influence of Ungulate Winter Ranges to increase alternate prey (e.g. moose) and predator selectivity for certain prey. Limiting management to only predators will likely result in a band-aid solution. 1. Continue examination of predator management options and likely effectiveness. Implement predator management project where science indicates that predator removal is necessary to achieve caribou recovery goals. RECOVERY ACTION #4: MANAGE THE PRIMARY PREY OF CARIBOU PREDATORS Since 2007, 2 projects have been initiated to determine if modified hunting of moose can result in reduced wolf density and, in turn predation on caribou. The Revelstoke Alternate Prey pilot project continues to monitor 3 caribou herds (Columbia North, Frisby Boulder, South Columbia) as well as moose recruitment and wolf populations in the study area. Based on 2013 results, 4

caribou numbers are up in the Columbia North herd, and are unchanged in the Frisby Boulder and Columbia South herds. Lake Revelstoke moose population and wolf numbers are both low. Comments from Progress Board: More communication is needed on this component of the MCRIP. White-tailed deer numbers appear to be up in many areas of the province, which may influence predator numbers. Alternately, moose numbers are down in places. These factors should be included in any decisions to expand use of alternate prey management. Areas with naturally low moose numbers may be good candidate areas to measure responses in wolf or caribou numbers. 1. Continue to monitor the results of these projects and report the results to the Progress Board. Prior to application to other areas of mountain caribou range, ensure this method has strong technical support and confidence it will be effective. RECOVERY ACTION #5: BOOST CARIBOU NUMBERS IN THREATENED HERDS Since 2007, several potential augmentation tools have started testing. A transplant to the Purcells South herd occurred in 2012. A maternal penning trial is being implemented near Revelstoke. An MOU has been signed with Parks Canada and the Calgary Zoo to develop captive breeding capacity. Comments from Progress Board; The Progress Board support for more augmentation of the Purcells South herd is conditional on receiving a strong independent evaluation supporting the second phase of the Purcells South augmentation project. Captive breeding is worth investigating to determine its value for mountain caribou recovery in BC. 1. MCRIP staff should complete an independent review to confirm the likelihood of success before undertaking the second phase of the Purcell South transplant. Progress Board wants to see the results of the assessment and provide advice or recommendations to government on the project. 2. Continue investigating the operational limitations and benefits of captive breeding. RECOVERY ACTION #6: SUPPORT ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH AND IMPLEMENT EFFECTIVE MONITORING PLANS Since 2007, adaptive management projects have been conducted to test caribou use of designated habitat. 5

1. Progress Board was generally satisfied with activity in this area. RECOVERY ACTION #7: INSTITUTE A CROSS-SECTOR PROGRESS BOARD TO MONITOR THE EFFECTIVENESS OF RECOVERY ACTIONS In 2007, a review board of stakeholders was established to review government progress on the MCRIP. The group meets periodically by phone or face to face meetings to discuss operational matters related to mountain caribou recovery. The Progress Board also holds an annual meeting to conduct a review of the previous year s work and to prepare and file a report to government. Comments from Progress Board: Progress Board members feel that communication between MCRIP staff and members could be more frequent. Members would like to see reports on projects undertaken by MCRIP. The meeting involving all stakeholder groups is valuable to enable information sharing and collaborative work. 1. MCRIP staff should make technical reports on MCRIP projects available to Progress Board members as soon as possible. This will allow members to more effectively comment on work intended to achieve the MCRIP goals and to distribute information to their constituency. 2. Progress Board should met quarterly (meeting or phone) for information sharing, updates on projects and discussion. 6