M2.50-cal. Multishot Capabilities at the US Army Research Laboratory

Similar documents
Shoreline Erosion and Proposed Control at Experimental Facility 15 Spesutie Island

MIL-DTL-5886G Ballistic Fragmentation Qualification of the Carleton Life Support Systems Oxygen Cylinder, Part Number

Water Ingress Failure Analysis of Whistler II Unit

AFRL-RH-WP-TR

A Low-Velocity 0.22-Caliber Gun System

AFRL-RX-WP-TP

z Interim Report for May 2004 to October 2005 Aircrew Performance and Protection Branch Wright-Patterson AFB, OH AFRL-HE-WP-TP

Design of a Combined Ballistic Simulator and Primer Force Experimental Fixture

Temporary Flying Restrictions Due to Exogenous Factors

Kelly Legault, Ph.D., P.E. USACE SAJ

Using SolidWorks & CFD to Create The Next Generation Airlocks

Aircraft Fuel Cell Repair Equipment

AN EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF SPILLING BREAKERS

Navy Shipbuilding Industrial Base

Characterizing The Surf Zone With Ambient Noise Measurements

Internal Waves and Mixing in the Aegean Sea

DOMESTIC PREPAREDNESS: PROTECTION FACTOR TESTING OF THE SE-SHIELD SUIT WITH THE SE400 POWERED AIR PURIFYING RESPIRATOR (PAPR)

Long-Term Autonomous Measurement of Ocean Dissipation with EPS-MAPPER

Evaluation of Microphone Windscreen Performance in a Wind Tunnel

The Effect of an Unconditioned Barrel on Temperature Conditioned 5.56mm Cartridges

DoD Coral Reef Protection and Management Program

DEVELOPMENT OF PRIMARY FRAGMENTATION SEPARATION DISTANCES FOR CASED CYLINDRICAL MUNITIONS

Marine Mammal Acoustic Tracking from Adapting HARP Technologies

Examples of Carter Corrected DBDB-V Applied to Acoustic Propagation Modeling

Remote Monitoring of Dolphins and Whales in the High Naval Activity Areas in Hawaiian Waters

Development of Low Volume Shape Memory Alloy Variable Ballast System for AUV Use

High-Frequency Scattering from the Sea Surface and Multiple Scattering from Bubbles

High Frequency Acoustical Propagation and Scattering in Coastal Waters

Waves, Bubbles, Noise, and Underwater Communications

TITLE: Assessing the Hydrodynamic Performance of Fouling-Release Surfaces (ONR Research Contract # N WR )

( max)o Wind Waves 10 Short Swell (large wave steepness) 25 Long Swell (small wave steepness) 75

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

BRRAKING WAVE FORCES ON WALLS

Air-Sea Interaction Spar Buoy Systems

Modifications to a Laboratory-Scale Confined Laser Ignition Chamber for Pressure Measurements to 70 MPa

TEST RESULTS OF AIR-PERMEABLE CHARCOAL IMPREGNATED SUITS TO CHALLENGE BY CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICALWARFARE AGENTS AND SIMULANTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Stability & Control Aspects of UCAV Configurations

Imaging the Lung Under Pressure

Concrete Obstacle Vulnerability

TEST RESULTS OF PHASE 2 LEVEL B SUITS TO CHALLENGE BY CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WARFARE AGENTS AND SIMULANTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Waves, Turbulence and Boundary Layers

TEST RESULTS OF PHASE 2 LEVEL A SUITS TO CHALLENGE BY CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WARFARE AGENTS AND SIMULANTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Internal Waves in Straits Experiment Progress Report

Domestic Preparedness: Corn Oil Protection Factor (PF) Testing of Commercial Air-Purifying Negative Pressure Respirators with P-100 Filter Cartridges

THE EFFECTS OF ULTRAHIGH-PRESSURE WATERJET IMPACT ON HIGH EXPLOSIVES

Tests of Level A Suits Protection Against Chemical and Biological Warfare Agents and Simulants: Executive Summary

Behavioral Response of Dolphins to Signals Simulating Mid-Frequency Sonar

EDGEWOOD CHEMICAL BIOLOGICAL CENTER U.S. ARMY RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING COMMAND

Cost-Effectiveness of CC&D Measures and their Interaction

EDGEWOOD CHEMICAL BIOLOGICAL CENTER U.S. ARMY SOLDIER AND BIOLOGICAL CHEMICAL COMMAND

SHOCK WAVE PROPAGATION THROUGH AERATED WATER

Global Ocean Internal Wave Database

Rogue Wave Statistics and Dynamics Using Large-Scale Direct Simulations

Harbor Threat Detection, Classification, and Identification

Anthropogenic Noise and the Marine Environment

OE Barricade Guide Development. Michelle Crull, PhD, PE Wallace Watanabe James Manthey, PE Charles Barker, PE

Understanding the Dynamics of Shallow-Water Oceanographic Moorings

Observations of Near-Bottom Currents with Low-Cost SeaHorse Tilt Current Meters

Three Dimensional Shallow Water Adaptive Hydraulics (ADH-SW3): Waterborne Vessels

Acoustic Focusing in Shallow Water and Bubble Radiation Effects

Frostbite in Ski Boots for Marines

Research, Development and Engineering Command, AMSRD-ECB-RT, AMSRD-ECB-EN, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD

Waves, Bubbles, Noise and Underwater Communications

Dynamic Pressure Testing of a 155-mm Howitzer Ballistic Window Using a Closed Bomb Vessel

Inlet Influence on the Pressure and Temperature Distortion Entering the Compressor of an Air Vehicle

Cruise Report Marine Mammal and Sea Turtle Observer UNDET Monitoring Hawaii Range Complex: 3 April 2014

Determination Of Nearshore Wave Conditions And Bathymetry From X-Band Radar Systems

PRODUCT LISTING AND DESCRIPTONS

Determination of Nearshore Wave Conditions and Bathymetry from X-Band Radar Systems

Coastal Engineering Technical Note

AFRL-RI-RS-TR

At-Sea Measurements of Diver Target Strengths at 100 khz: Measurement Technique and First Results

The Influence of Breaking at the Ocean Surface on Oceanic Radiance and Imaging

Calculation of the Internal Blast Pressures for Tunnel Magazine Tests

Live Round Interrupter (LRI) Technical Implementation White Paper

RIP CURRENTS. Award # N

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

SIMULATED PROOF TESTING OF MORTAR BASEPLATES

Observations of Velocity Fields Under Moderately Forced Wind Waves

Right Whale Diving and Foraging Behavior in the Southwestern Gulf of Maine

Award Number: N

Finalizing the DTAG: Implementation and Testing of Design Improvements for Reliability and Availability

Next Generation Modeling for Deep Water Wave Breaking and Langmuir Circulation

ADIABATIC INITIATION SENSITIVITY OF LIQUID ENERGETIC MATERIALS. Twenty-Seventh DOD Explosives Safety Seminar Las Vegas, Nevada August 1996

Tagging and Playback Studies to Toothed Whales

STUDIES OF FINITE AMPLITUDE SHEAR WAVE INSTABILITIES. James T. Kirby. Center for Applied Coastal Research. University of Delaware.

NONLINEAR INTERNAL WAVES IN THE SOUTH CHINA SEA

Fig. 2. M.I. Yaroslavtsev, 2002

AFRL-RH-WP-TP

LOADED MULTICELLULAR MAGAZINE. Laurent ALLA IN

TITLE XI--FIREARMS Subtitle A--Assault Weapons. Legal Issues

Implementation of Structures in the CMS: Part IV, Tide Gate

PREDICTION OF ERODED VERSUS ACCRETED BEACHES

GAU-18 REPLICA WEAPON TRAINING SYSTEMS REALISTIC REPLICA WEAPON... REALISTIC RECOIL... REALISTIC TRAINING! ACME s ultrarealistic

Hydro-Thermal Vent Mapping with Multiple AUV's AZORES-2001

Nearshore Wave-Topography Interactions

Adib R. Farsoun. U.S. Army Engineer Division, Huntsville 106 Wynn Dr. Huntsville, AL ABSTRACT

Shoreline Change Modeling Using One-Line Models: Application and Comparison of GenCade, Unibest, and Litpack

Transcription:

ARL-TN-0694 SEP 2015 US Army Research Laboratory M2.50-cal. Multishot Capabilities at the US Army Research Laboratory by Todd Brinkman Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

NOTICES Disclaimers The findings in this report are not to be construed as an official Department of the Army position unless so designated by other authorized documents. Citation of manufacturer s or trade names does not constitute an official endorsement or approval of the use thereof. Destroy this report when it is no longer needed. Do not return it to the originator.

ARL-TN-0694 SEP 2015 US Army Research Laboratory M2.50-cal. Multishot Capabilities at the US Army Research Laboratory by Todd Brinkman Weapons and Materials Research Directorate, ARL Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. 1. REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYYY) September 2015 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 2. REPORT TYPE Technical Note M2.50-cal. Multishot Capabilities at the US Army Research Laboratory 3. DATES COVERED (From - To) July 2014 July 2015 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) Todd Brinkman 5d. PROJECT NUMBER AH-80 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) US Army Research Laboratory ATTN: RDRL-WMP-G Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005-5069 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER ARL-TN-0694 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR'S ACRONYM(S) 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR'S REPORT NUMBER(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 14. ABSTRACT This technical note shows the capabilities and method required to fire dual single-shot Mann barrels in a multishot scenario. This note will also discuss the equipment required to perform a multishot task. 15. SUBJECT TERMS solenoid, barrel, small arms, mount, time delay 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: a. REPORT b. ABSTRACT c. THIS PAGE Unclassified Unclassified Unclassified 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT UU 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 16 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Todd Brinkman 19b. TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include area code) 410-278-3734 Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8/98) Prescribed by ANSI Std. Z39.18 ii

Contents List of Figures Acknowledgments iv v 1. Introduction 1 2. Procedure 1 2.1 Mounts 1 2.2 Firing Unit 2 2.3 Sequencer/Time Delay Generator 3 2.4 Solenoid 4 3. Discussion 5 4. References 6 Distribution List 7 iii

List of Figures Fig. 1 The 2-inch-thick aluminum mounts...2 Fig. 2 The 2-Mann-barrel setup...2 Fig. 3 Firing unit...3 Fig. 4 Amphenol-to-BNC adapter cable...3 Fig. 5 Sequencer...4 Fig. 6 Firing solenoid...4 Fig. 7 The 2-Mann-barrel setup mounted to a Frankford Arsenal rest...5 iv

Acknowledgments I would like to acknowledge the following personnel for their assistance and dedication during this experiment: Travis Payne, instrumentation technician (Weapons and Materials Research Directorate [WMRD]) Charles Wilhelm, instrumentation technician (WMRD, DSI contractor) Rick Rapposelli, gunner (WMRD, Bowhead contractor) v

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. vi

1. Introduction In small arms experimentation it is desirable to conduct experiments using an actual fielded threat weapon system whenever possible. On occasion, however, this may not be possible, and a surrogate must be substituted. In these experiments a platform was designed to simulate the 2-round burst of the M2.50-caliber Browning machine gun (BMG). The 2-round-burst cyclic rate was achieved by using 2 Mann barrels, fired off of a standard Frankford Arsenal rest in conjunction with a time delay generator. 2. Procedure In small arms experimentation a Mann barrel is often used as a surrogate for a small arms weapons system. When used in conjunction with a breech cap, firing solenoid, and firing box, the Mann barrel will deliver the same results as an actual small arms weapon in single shot mode. The requirement for this experiment was to simulate a 2-round burst at a rate of 0.12 s between rounds. Because of the time needed to reload, this firing rate was not achievable with a single Mann barrel. As a result, a platform was developed using 2 Mann barrels to achieve the 2-round burst rate. A set of custom 2-part mounts was designed that would accept 2 Mann barrels and also bolt into a Frankford Arsenal mount. Also, a firing unit was fabricated that would provide the same cyclic rate of fire for 2 shots. 2.1 Mounts While the mounts were being designed, consideration was taken for the space allowance between not only the barrels but also the firing solenoids. Ease of operation, such as installation and removal of the barrels and solenoids, loading of the cartridges, and cleaning were also factors in its design. The design also had to be robust enough to handle the effects of multiple shots. Based on experience, it was determined that 2-inch-thick aluminum, machined from billet stock, should be able to withstand the rigors of the firing sequence (Fig. 1). The cutouts on the mount were designed large enough to accept sizes up to a standard Mann barrel and also a barrel with a smaller profile. In this case, the space between the barrel and inside diameter of the mounts was sleeved with thin strips of lead to ensure a secure fit. The mounts were bolted to the Frankford Arsenal rest with all-thread, washers, and bolts (Fig. 2). 1

Fig. 1 The 2-inch-thick aluminum mounts Fig. 2 The 2-Mann-barrel setup 2.2 Firing Unit A custom-made firing unit that was used to provide the required power to the firing solenoid is shown in Fig. 3. It is a 115-V alternating current (AC) power supply that converts the supplied energy to direct current (DC). Seventy volts of DC is the minimum power required to sufficiently drive the shaft in the solenoid for successful functioning of the round(s). A short DC-to-BNC (Bayonnet Neill- Concelman) adapter (Fig. 4) was made to deliver the required voltage from the firing box to the firing line; an Amphenol connector is used at the box end of the adapter. This adapter hooked directly to the firing line which, in turn, connected to the firing solenoid. 2

Fig. 3 Firing unit Fig. 4 Amphenol-to-BNC adapter cable 2.3 Sequencer/Time Delay Generator The M2 BMG fires at a rate of 0.12 s between rounds. This delay is based on an assumed cyclic rate of 450 to 550 rounds/min when using M33 ball ammunition. 1 To replicate this rate of fire, a sequencer (Fig. 5), or time delay generator, was implemented in the setup. These generators are used in many types of experiments, controls, and processes where electronic timing of a single event or multiple events to a common timing reference is needed. The delay generator may initiate a sequence of events or be triggered by an event. What differentiates it from ordinary electronic timing is the synchronicity of its outputs to each other and to the initiating event. 3

Fig. 5 Sequencer 2.4 Solenoid The firing solenoid used for this experiment is shown in Fig 6. A complete description of the solenoid can be found in the US Army Research Laboratory (ARL) technical note titled Implementation of Improved Firing Solenoids for Experimental Gun Tubes. 2 Fig. 6 Firing solenoid 4

3. Discussion The 2-Mann-barrel setup shown in Fig. 7 was most recently used on a.50-cal. Fuel Fire program for ARL at Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD. With the aforementioned components in place for the experiment, the required firing rate of 0.12 s between rounds was achieved, giving researchers technical insight into a multishot scenario against a surrogate fuel tank. Timing sequences were verified through the use of North American Camera high-speed imagery. Frankford Arsenal rest Fig. 7 The 2-Mann-barrel setup mounted to a Frankford Arsenal rest A description of.50-cal. multishot capabilities, as well as the setup, has been detailed in this technical note. They have proven to be an effective combination for multihit scenarios when an original weapon is not available for experimentation. It is believed that this setup can be used to achieve 2-shot cyclic rates of fire on a wide array of small arms weaponry within the military arsenal. 5

4. References 1. Army Study Guide. M2 equipment information; nd [accessed 2015 Aug 24]. http://www.armystudyguide.com/content/army_board_study_guide_topics /m2/m2-equipment-information.shtml. 2. Brinkman T. Implementation of improved firing solenoids for experimental gun tubes. Aberdeen Proving Ground (MD): Army Research Laboratory (US); 2014 Oct. Report No.: ARL-TN-0639. 6

1 DEFENSE TECHNICAL (PDF) INFORMATION CTR DTIC OCA 2 DIRECTOR (PDF) US ARMY RESEARCH LAB RDRL CIO LL IMAL HRA MAIL & RECORDS MGMT 1 GOVT PRINTG OFC (PDF) A MALHOTRA 2 DIR USARL (PDF) RDRL WMP G T BRINKMAN T PAYNE 7

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. 8