IMPLEMENTATION. PEDESTRIAN USERS (Continued /) Building Frontages: A: Stair Applications. Geometry (Accessed from the Sidewalk) Refer to A:

Similar documents
IMPLEMENTATION. PEDESTRIAN USERS (Continued /) A: Class 2 Pedestrian / Cycle Ways. Pedestrian and Cycle Ways:

DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK

Classification Criteria

ROUNDABOUTS/TRAFFIC CIRCLES

TGSI Tactile Ground Surface Indicators

CHAPTER 16 PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES DESIGN AND TECHNICAL CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHECKLIST 2: PRELIMINARY DESIGN STAGE AUDIT

Appendix C. TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM TOOLBOX

10.0 CURB EXTENSIONS GUIDELINE

CURRENT ORIGINAL REFERENCE SECTIONS. (Typical Section) (Typical Section) The Parade Island Bay : Concept Option Summary Sheets.

Agenda. Overview PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Off-road Trails. Guidance

INDEX. Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads INDEX

Roadways. Roadways III.

Anne Arundel County BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN, TRANSIT ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES

Appendix 3 Roadway and Bike/Ped Design Standards

complete streets design and construction standards public primer City of Edmonton

RAILWAY LEVEL CROSSING CHECKLIST Road Safety Review of Railway Crossings

Footpath design. A guide to creating footpaths that are safe, comfortable, and easy to use

10 SHERFORD Town Code

guide to a phased approach TRIPP

APPENDIX A BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN, AND TRANSIT ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET. B. Subdivision/Site Development Plan/Grading Permit Name and Number:

Aurora Urban Street Standards For Transit Oriented Developments and Urban Centers

This Chapter sets forth the minimum design, technical criteria and specifications to be used in the preparation of all roadway plans.

Guidance. ATTACHMENT F: Draft Additional Pages for Bicycle Facility Design Toolkit Separated Bike Lanes: Two-Way to One-Way Transitions

CHAPTER 5: GENERAL SITE AND BUILDING ELEMENTS

City of Albert Lea Policy and Procedure Manual 4.10 ALBERT LEA CROSSWALK POLICY

Accommodating Pedestrians in the Work Zone

Standards vs. Guidelines. Public Right-of Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG)

(HIGHWAY GEOMETRIC DESIGN -1)

Intersection Design. Leah Ness, Craig Hardy and Eric Sorensen

ADA Design Overview. Section 2. ADA Design Overview. Pedestrian Access Routes. Pedestrian Access Routes. Overview

BACCHER CERTIFICATES / CONTENTS CERTIFICATES / STATUS CONTENTS. l TRAFFIC ACCOMMODATION. ROAD SERVICES (PTY) LTD Your Vision Our Reality!

ADA on Construction. Guidance for Section C Plan Preparers

Active Transportation Facility Glossary

Field guide for Accessible Public Rights-of-Way Edition

CITY OF OTTAWA ROADWAY MODIFICATION APPROVAL UNDER DELEGATED AUTHORITY

PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Broad Street Bicycle Boulevard Design Guidelines

IAN WHITE ASSOCIATES. Crawley Station Gateway Public Realm

OLDER PEOPLE INDEPENDENT MOBILITY FOR LIVEABLE COMMUNITIES. Christopher G B (Kit) Mitchell

RE: 100 VARLEY LANE TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW

DEFINING THE STREETSCAPE DRAFT

Figure 3B-1. Examples of Two-Lane, Two-Way Marking Applications

Introduction Methodology Study area and data collection Results and recommendation Conclusion References

2.0 LANE WIDTHS GUIDELINE

ADA & Public Rights of Way

Access Management in the Vicinity of Intersections

Cycle Track Design Best Practices Cycle Track Sections

Intersection Safety 6/7/2015 INTERSECTIONS. Five basic elements should be considered in intersection design. Intersection Safety (continued)

Copenhagen Cycling Map. Red Lines Cycling facilities

Dr. Naveed Anwar Executive Director, AIT Consulting Affiliated Faculty, Structural Engineering Director, ACECOMS

Chapter 3 DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS

Ballston Station Multimodal Study WMATA and Arlington County. Meeting Minutes

CHECKLIST 5: ROADWORK TRAFFIC SCHEME AUDIT

CAR PARKING [15] General provision

Multimodal Through Corridors and Placemaking Corridors

CURBSIDE ACTIVITY DESIGN

City of Wayzata Comprehensive Plan 2030 Transportation Chapter: Appendix A

Item to be Addressed Checklist Consideration YES NO N/A Required Description Complete Streets Guidelines

State Road 54/56 Tampa Bay s Northern Loop. The Managed Lane Solution Linking I-75 to the Suncoast Parkway

TRAFFIC CALMING GUIDE FOR TORONTO CITY OF TORONTO TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVISION

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

NJDOT Complete Streets Checklist

Field guide for Accessible Public Rights-of-Way Edition

PERFORMANCE ACTIVITY 306 DRAINAGE PIPE WORK DESCRIPTION 4

Geometric Design Tables

CHECKLIST 6: EXISTING ROADS: ROAD SAFETY AUDIT

Designing Pedestrian Facilities for Accessibility. Module 3 Curb Ramps & Blended Transitions

Pedestrian crossings: design guideline for TGSI application in South Africa

Road Markings. Lecture Notes in Transportation Systems Engineering. Prof. Tom V. Mathew. 1 Overview 1. 2 Classification 2

Complete Streets Design Considerations. Second Street Corridor Complete Streets Workshop and Assessment Manchester, NH April 26, 2013

4. Guided Bus Explained


City of Vestavia Hills Traffic Calming Policy for Residential Streets

Geometric designs for Safe Highways. Dr. Manoj M. Asst. Professor Department of Civil Engineering IIT Delhi

Town of Mooresville, North Carolina Neighborhood Traffic Calming and Control Device Policy

SECTION V - CIRCULATION PLAN

Omaha s Complete Streets Policy

Section 4: Inventory Methodology and Findings

Parking. Parking 11/27/2012. On street parking. Off-street parking is space provided for vehicular parking outside the dedicated street right-of-way.

CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS PEDESTRIAN CROSSING TOOLBOX

RIVERSIDE, Newton MA BH NORMANDY RIVERSIDE LLC. Riverside Station. A green, transit-oriented community

PEDESTRIAN ACCOMMODATIONS DPS 201 AT ROUNDABOUTS

Driveway Design Criteria

INTERSECTIONS AT GRADE INTERSECTIONS

Introduction. Using the Checklist. TDM-Supportive Development Design and Infrastructure Checklist Version 1.0 (30 June 2017) City of Ottawa

Revisions to Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards (2016 Update)

7/23/2017 VIA . Michael Hanebutt City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards Boulevard, 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811

City of Vallejo Traffic Calming Toolbox

Public Information Centre

Appendix A: Crosswalk Policy

City of Roseville Section 13 Design Standards. _Bikeways January 2016 SECTION 13 BIKEWAYS

CONTEXT SENSITIVE STREETS STANDARDS COMMITTEE

Policy Statement. Objective. Context. References and Supporting Documentation

Frascati Road and Temple Hill Route Improvements. Outline Design Report to Accompany Public consultation

DESIGN CODE. Enterprise West Harlow London Road North Design Code 21

Road Markings. Lecture Notes in Transportation Systems Engineering. Prof. Tom V. Mathew

Chapter 2: Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit

COMPLETE STREETS DURING CONSTRUCTION

Transcription:

A: Stair Applications Building Frontages: Geometry (Accessed from the Sidewalk) Refer to A: Ramps should be provided for disabled users at 1:12 (8.3%) gradient. Ramp rises should be stepped at 400mm intervals. Stairs to be implemented according to National Building Regulations (SABS 1900) Public stairs 1.5m width, minimum of 3 steps, non-slip materials with -2% gradients for drainage. B: Bicycle Ramps at Public Stairs Bicycle Ramps and Storage (Refer to B): Bicycle ramps to be provided adjacent to all stairs 1:2 (50%) gradient. Locate bicycle storage and parking adjacent to major destinations i.e. BRT stations, GRRL station, employment-, retail- and entertainment centres. Storage geometry: Length: 1.8m Width: 0.6m Height: 2.1m Aisle: 1.5m Application Areas: All building frontages leading out onto Class 3 roads. 120

PUBLIC TRANSPORT A: Feeder and Public Transport Routes Surfacing Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) and Supporting Public Transport: BRT Feeder and Other Public Transport Routes (Refer to A) BRT Feeder Routes, GRRL feeder/distribution system and other public transport modes generally travel on Class 3 routes. Feeder routes form part of the general traffic stream and are not separated as with trunk routes. Signage and special road surfacing should demarcate these feeder routes. BRT Feeder Stops and Other Public Transport Stops (Refer to B and C) Stops to be provided within the road reserve, but also separated from through traffic (i.e. Lay-by) Multi-modal stop sharing is encouraged. Multi-modal signage recommended at stops. Enforcement Dedicated public transport lanes must be enforced by CCTV cameras and electronic ticketing for private vehicle drivers entering restricted public transport roadspace. B: Feeder and Public Transport Stops Application Areas: BRT feeder routes according to City of Johannesburg BRT Scoping Study (Transportation Planning Department). SPTN routes according to the City of Johannesburg Integrated Transport Plan. Gauteng Rapid Rail Link feeder / distribution routes. C: Feeder Stops 121

PRIVATE TRANSPORT A: 90 On-street Parking Dimensions Parking: Geometry and Layout (Refer to A, B and C) Parking standards are to be applied in accordance with the National Department of Transport Parking Standards (2 nd Edition), 1985. Application Areas (Refer to D): On-street parking is acceptable on Class 3 routes, but not preferred. On-street parking should primarily be provided along Class 4 and 5 routes. B: 45 On-street Parking Dimensions C: Parallel Parking Dimensions D: Typical Layout Applications of On-street Parking 122

Class 4 and 5 Roads CLASS 4/5 ROAD SELECTED ROADWAY ELEMENT DESIGN CODES FOR MARLBORO PRECINCT Development Cell Circulation Description: Residential collector / access roads serving properties within the precinct. These roads are mainly utilised as access routes with little mobility. Street Classification: Road Hierarchy Fredman Maude Gwen Bute Norwich Close Protea Place Sandown Valley Alice Characteristics: Speed: 60 km/h Vehicle volumes: 500 1500 veh/hr Geometry: Primarily single carriageway roads but dual carriageway class 3 roads are not uncommon Turning Radii: > 4.2m < 10m Level of Access: LOA 7 LOA 8 Parking: On-street acceptable Surfacing: Road surfacing materials may vary from standard asphalt surfaces. Alternative surfacing should be standard at intersections and at midblock pedestrian crossings. Sight Distances Kerb Radii (Turning Vehicles) 123

PEDESTRIAN USERS A: Priority Mid-block Crossing Priority Mid-Block Pedestrian Crossings Yield Layout (Refer to A): Provide yield mid-block crossings along Class 4/5 routes. RTM 4 pedestrian crossing lines to be implemented (minimum width 2.4m/ desirable 5m width) No overtaking line RM1 fro 9m minimum / 16m preferred. RTM2 road signage with yield sign WM5 RTM2 to be placed 3m minimum 6m from block pedestrian crossing (RTM4). Option to provide raised block pedestrian crossing to serve as further speed reduction tool. Road Lighting (Refer to B): Street lighting to be provided as per NDoT Pedestrian Guideline Standard. Kerb Transitions (Refer to C): Kerb ramps must be implemented at all crossing points to accommodate for wheelchair users and sight impaired pedestrians. C: Kerb-Ramp Details B: Lighting of Mid-Block Crossings Application Areas: High volume pedestrian crossing points that occur mid-block between two land-use attractors or where intersection spacing is longer than 300m apart. 124

A: Roundabout Intersection Pedestrian Crossing Intersection Crossings: Roundabout Intersection Pedestrian Crossing (Refer to A): RTM 4 pedestrian crossings to be implemented (minimum width 1.5m / desirable width 3m) RTM 2 with WM5 yield road signage on both sides of the pedestrian crossing. Therefore vehicle will yield for pedestrians before entering the circle, then vehicles upon entering the circle, again yielding before exiting the desired road. Shared pedestrian and cycle lanes provided adjacent to road with signage R113 W201 Roundabout sign Provide barrier kerbing. Option to provide raised roundabout intersection to further reduce vehicular speed. Staged Intersection Crossing (Refer to B): RTM 3 pedestrian crossing lines to be implemented (minimum width 1.5m / desirable width 3m) Interlocking pavers or coloured asphalt is recommended at Class 4/5 junctions serving as gateways to a residential road. Staged crossings should be considered. Minimum median width for staged crossings 2m. Raised pedestrian crossing can be considered. Road Lighting (Refer to C): Staged Intersection Crossing Dimensions Street lighting to be provided as per NDoT Pedestrian Guideline Standard. C: Intersection Lighting D: Kerb Transitions Kerb Transitions (Refer to D): Kerb ramps must be implemented at all crossing points to accommodate for wheelchair users and sight impaired pedestrians. 125

Application Areas: Road intersections between Class 4 roads and Class 5 roads and Class 5 roads and Class 5 roads. 126

A: Class 4 and 5 Pedestrian / Cycle Ways Pedestrian and Cycle Ways: Layout and Geometry (Refer to A): Walkways to be provided adjacent to all Class 4/5 Roads with cycle ways provided within roadway separated by paint marking. Walkway and cycle way also separated because of speed differential of modes (Barrier Kerb 0.3m). All existing lateral obstructions should be removed from the walkway / cycle way area. Design Dimensions Walkway (Refer to B) Cycle way B: Geometry and Design Dimensions Gradient 5% Gradient 5% Minimum Width 1.5m Minimum Width 2.5m Desirable width 1.8m Desirable width 3m Lateral clearance 0.1m Height clearance 2.1m Lateral clearance 0.5m Height clearance 2.1m Buffer strip 0.6m Buffer strip 0.6m B: Geometry and Design Dimensions C: Lighting along walkways and cycle ways Surfacing: Surfacing should be conducive to movement of able bodied users and users with disabilities. Gratings and covers opening 12mm. Edges Edges should be defined visually and tactile. Handrails to be implemented where vertical drop of 0.8m with slope steeper than 1:2 (50%) occurs within 1.2m from edge. D: Walkways along Urban Links Lighting (Refer to C): Lighting should be provided along all walkways and cycle ways for safety and security as well as night-time operational reasons. 127

Application Areas (Refer to D and E): Adjacent to all Class 4/5 roads Facilities (walkways and cycle ways) to be aligned to crossing points at intersections and mid-block crossings. E: Walkways at Activity Centres 128

A: Stair Applications Building Frontages: Geometry (Accessed from the Sidewalk) Refer to A: Ramps should be provided for disabled users at 1:12 (8.3%) gradient. Ramp rises should be stepped at 400mm intervals. Stairs to be implemented according to National Building Regulations (SABS 1900) Public stairs 1.5m width, minimum of 3 steps, non-slip materials with -2% gradients for drainage. B: Bicycle Ramps at Public Stairs Bicycle Ramps and Storage (Refer to B): Bicycle ramps to be provided adjacent to all stairs 1:2 (50%) gradient. Locate bicycle storage and parking adjacent to major destinations i.e. BRT stations, GRRL station, employment-, retail- and entertainment centres. Storage geometry: Length: 1.8m Width: 0.6m Height: 2.1m Aisle: 1.5m Application Areas: All building frontages leading out onto Class 4/5 roads. 129