IMPLEMENTATION. PEDESTRIAN USERS (Continued /) A: Class 2 Pedestrian / Cycle Ways. Pedestrian and Cycle Ways:

Similar documents
IMPLEMENTATION. PEDESTRIAN USERS (Continued /) Building Frontages: A: Stair Applications. Geometry (Accessed from the Sidewalk) Refer to A:

DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK

Classification Criteria

RAILWAY LEVEL CROSSING CHECKLIST Road Safety Review of Railway Crossings

CHAPTER 16 PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES DESIGN AND TECHNICAL CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS

ADA Design Overview. Section 2. ADA Design Overview. Pedestrian Access Routes. Pedestrian Access Routes. Overview

ROUNDABOUTS/TRAFFIC CIRCLES

Roadways. Roadways III.

guide to a phased approach TRIPP

Cycle Track Design Best Practices Cycle Track Sections

10.0 CURB EXTENSIONS GUIDELINE

Appendix C. TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM TOOLBOX

This Chapter sets forth the minimum design, technical criteria and specifications to be used in the preparation of all roadway plans.

Guidance. ATTACHMENT F: Draft Additional Pages for Bicycle Facility Design Toolkit Separated Bike Lanes: Two-Way to One-Way Transitions

complete streets design and construction standards public primer City of Edmonton

Standards vs. Guidelines. Public Right-of Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG)

INDEX. Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads INDEX

TGSI Tactile Ground Surface Indicators

Footpath design. A guide to creating footpaths that are safe, comfortable, and easy to use

Ballston Station Multimodal Study WMATA and Arlington County. Meeting Minutes

CHECKLIST 2: PRELIMINARY DESIGN STAGE AUDIT

Accommodating Pedestrians in the Work Zone

10 SHERFORD Town Code

City of Albert Lea Policy and Procedure Manual 4.10 ALBERT LEA CROSSWALK POLICY

Dr. Naveed Anwar Executive Director, AIT Consulting Affiliated Faculty, Structural Engineering Director, ACECOMS

CHAPTER 5: GENERAL SITE AND BUILDING ELEMENTS

DEFINING THE STREETSCAPE DRAFT

Appendix 3 Roadway and Bike/Ped Design Standards

Pedestrian Crossing Guidelines 2016

ADA on Construction. Guidance for Section C Plan Preparers

Transportation Planning Division

Off-road Trails. Guidance

Intersection Design. Leah Ness, Craig Hardy and Eric Sorensen

Anne Arundel County BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN, TRANSIT ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES

2.0 LANE WIDTHS GUIDELINE

CITY OF OTTAWA ROADWAY MODIFICATION APPROVAL UNDER DELEGATED AUTHORITY

CURRENT ORIGINAL REFERENCE SECTIONS. (Typical Section) (Typical Section) The Parade Island Bay : Concept Option Summary Sheets.

Field guide for Accessible Public Rights-of-Way Edition

Agenda. Overview PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Broad Street Bicycle Boulevard Design Guidelines

CONTEXT SENSITIVE STREETS STANDARDS COMMITTEE

APPENDIX A BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN, AND TRANSIT ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET. B. Subdivision/Site Development Plan/Grading Permit Name and Number:

(HIGHWAY GEOMETRIC DESIGN -1)

PROCEDURE FOR ACCOMMODATING PEDESTRIANS IN WORK ZONES FOR CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE

MUTCD Part 6G: Type of Temporary Traffic Control Zone Activities

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

CHECKLIST 6: EXISTING ROADS: ROAD SAFETY AUDIT

ADA & Public Rights of Way

Re-Engineering Transport Designs for Safe and Universal Accessibility. Dr. Sewa Ram School of Planning and Architecture New Delhi

Aurora Urban Street Standards For Transit Oriented Developments and Urban Centers


Freeway System Considerations

TRAFFIC CALMING GUIDE FOR TORONTO CITY OF TORONTO TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVISION

THE APPLICATION OF TACTILE GROUND SURFACE INDICATORS (TGSI s) ON INTERSECTIONS IN SOUTH AFRICA ABSTRACT

IAN WHITE ASSOCIATES. Crawley Station Gateway Public Realm

Parking. Parking 11/27/2012. On street parking. Off-street parking is space provided for vehicular parking outside the dedicated street right-of-way.

Active Transportation Facility Glossary

Frascati Road and Temple Hill Route Improvements. Outline Design Report to Accompany Public consultation

7/23/2017 VIA . Michael Hanebutt City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards Boulevard, 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811

REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

PERFORMANCE ACTIVITY 306 DRAINAGE PIPE WORK DESCRIPTION 4

Item to be Addressed Checklist Consideration YES NO N/A Required Description Complete Streets Guidelines

PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Road Markings. Lecture Notes in Transportation Systems Engineering. Prof. Tom V. Mathew

OLDER PEOPLE INDEPENDENT MOBILITY FOR LIVEABLE COMMUNITIES. Christopher G B (Kit) Mitchell

5/31/2016 VIA . Arwen Wacht City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards Blvd., 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811

STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING June 17, Streetscape Overview Burlington Comprehensive Master Plan

Multimodal Through Corridors and Placemaking Corridors

Balancing Operation & Safety for Motorized and Non-Motorized Traffic

CHECKLIST 5: ROADWORK TRAFFIC SCHEME AUDIT

Appendix T CCMP TRAIL TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION DESIGN STANDARD

State Road 54/56 Tampa Bay s Northern Loop. The Managed Lane Solution Linking I-75 to the Suncoast Parkway

Traffic Control Inspection Checklist Segment:

CAR PARKING [15] General provision

5/7/2013 VIA . RE: University Village Safeway Expansion (P13-019)

Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) November 21, 2013

Complete Streets Design Considerations. Second Street Corridor Complete Streets Workshop and Assessment Manchester, NH April 26, 2013

NJDOT Complete Streets Checklist

01. VICINITY OF GREENBRAE POC: EXISTING CONDITIONS

Driveway Design Criteria

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS. That Council approve:

Access Management in the Vicinity of Intersections

Chapter 3 DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS

INTRODUCTION THOROUGHFARE SYSTEM CLASSIFICATIONS

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

DESIGN CODE. Enterprise West Harlow London Road North Design Code 21

Recommended Roadway Plan Section 2 - Land Development and Roadway Access

INTERSECTIONS AT GRADE INTERSECTIONS

City of Wayzata Comprehensive Plan 2030 Transportation Chapter: Appendix A

The Safe System Approach

RE: 100 VARLEY LANE TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW

Retrofitting Urban Arterials into Complete Streets

Geometric Design Tables

1.3.4 CHARACTERISTICS OF CLASSIFICATIONS

Appendix A: Crosswalk Policy

DEFINITIONS Activity Area - Advance Warning Area Advance Warning Sign Spacing Advisory Speed Approach Sight Distance Attended Work Space

RIVERSIDE, Newton MA BH NORMANDY RIVERSIDE LLC. Riverside Station. A green, transit-oriented community

Van Ness Avenue Bus Rapid Transit

Entry Treatments. Traffic Advisory Leaflet 2/94 August Introduction. Design. Vertical Deflections. Locations

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE Traffic Department MEMORANDUM

Transcription:

A: Class 2 Pedestrian / Cycle Ways PLAN VIEW Pedestrian and Cycle Ways: Layout and Geometry (Refer to A): Walkways and cycle to be provided adjacent to all Class 2 Roads (these facilities should always be separated from the roadway itself by means of a buffer strip minimum 1.0m / desirable 3m). Walkway and cycle way also separated because of speed differential of modes (planted median 0.8m). All existing lateral obstructions should be removed from the walkway / cycle way area. Design Dimensions Walkway (Refer to B) Cycle way (Refer to B) PERSPECTIVE VIEW Gradient 5% Gradient 5% Minimum Width 1.2m Minimum Width 1.5m Desirable width 1.8m Desirable width 1.8m Lateral clearance 0.1m Height clearance 2.1m Buffer strip 1m Lateral clearance 0.5m Height clearance 2.1m Buffer strip 1m B: Geometry and Design Dimensions B: Geometry and Design Dimensions Surfacing: Surfacing should be conducive to movement of able bodied users and users with disabilities. Gratings and covers opening 12mm. Edges Edges should be defined visually and tactile. Handrails to be implemented where vertical drop of 0.8m with slope steeper than 1:2 (50%) occurs within 1.2m from edge. C: Lighting along walkways and cycle ways Lighting (Refer to C): Lighting should be provided along all walkways and cycle ways for safety and security as well as night-time operational reasons. Application Areas (Refer to D and E): 110

Adjacent to all Class 2 roads Facilities (walkways and cycle ways) to be aligned to crossing points at intersections and mid-block crossings. E: Walkways at Activity Centres D: Walkways along Urban Links 111

A: Stair Applications Building Frontages: Geometry (Accessed from the Sidewalk) Refer to A: Ramps should be provided for disabled users at 1:12 (8.3%) gradient. Ramp rises should be stepped at 400mm intervals. Stairs to be implemented according to National Building Regulations (SABS 1900) Public stairs 1.5m width, minimum of 3 steps, non-slip materials with -2% gradients for drainage. B: Bicycle Ramps at Public Stairs Bicycle Ramps and Storage (Refer to B): Bicycle ramps to be provided adjacent to all stairs 1:2 (50%) gradient. Locate bicycle storage and parking adjacent to major destinations i.e. BRT stations, GRRL station, employment-, retail- and entertainment centres. Storage geometry: Length: 1.8m Width: 0.6m Height: 2.1m Aisle: 1.5m Application Areas: All building frontages leading out onto Class 2 roads. 112

PUBLIC TRANSPORT A: Bus Rapid Transit Routes Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) and Supporting Public Transport: Trunk Routes Refer to A: Dedicated median lanes (Separated from other traffic). Geometry of dedicated lanes as well as route alignment should be sourced from COJ BRT Scoping Study. Trunk Stops Refer to B: Dedicated median stops / stations (Separated from other traffic). Median stations to be connected to pedestrian and cycle ways by means of mid-block or intersection signalized pedestrian crossings. Geometry of BRT stops and stations should be sourced from COJ BRT Scoping Study. BRT Feeder Routes and Other Supporting Public Transport Feeder routes form part of the general traffic stream and are not separated as with trunk routes. Signage and special road surfacing should demarcate these feeder routes. BRT Feeder Stops and Other Public Transport Stops (Refer to C) Stops to be provided within the road reserve, but also separated from through traffic (i.e. Lay-by) Multi-modal stop sharing is encouraged. Multi-modal signage recommended at stops. B: Bus Rapid Transit Stops Enforcement Dedicated public transport lanes must be enforced by CCTV cameras and electronic ticketing for private vehicle drivers entering restricted public transport roadspace. Application Areas: BRT Trunk Route along Rivonia Road according to City of Johannesburg BRT Scoping Study (Transportation Planning Department). C: Feeder Stops 113

Class 3 Road CLASS 3 ROAD SELECTED ROADWAY ELEMENT DESIGN CODES FOR MARLBORO PRECINCT Development Cell Circulation Description: Minor arterial road / collector road serving as internal vehicular circulation road within the precinct. These roads have a greater balance between mobility and access. The roads serve the internal circulation of the precinct as well as the relatively few trips wishing to travel through the precinct, as opposed to traveling around the precinct on the Class 2 Arterial Routes. Street Classification: Road Hierarchy Glenhove Street Baker Street Characteristics: Speed: Vehicle volumes: Geometry: Turning Radii: Level of Access: Parking: Surfacing: 60 km/h 1750 5000 veh/hr Primarily single carriageway roads but dual carriageway class 3 roads are not uncommon > 4.2m < 10m LOA 3 LOA 6 (Balance between mobility and access interrupted flow) On-street acceptable Road surfacing materials may vary from standard asphalt surfaces. Alternative surfacing should be standard at intersection with high pedestrian conflicting movements as well as along public transport routes with dedicated lanes. Sight Distances Kerb Radii (Turning Vehicles) 114

PEDESTRIAN USERS Conceptualisation of Mid-block Crossings Mid Block Pedestrian Crossings Signal Layout (Refer to A): Provide signalized mid-block crossings along Class 3 routes with S11 signal heads and pedestrian demand push-buttons. Audible signals to be implemented for sight impaired road users. RTM 4 pedestrian crossing lines to be implemented (minimum width 2.3m / desirable width 5m) Signal heads to be placed 3m from RTM1 stop line. W306 signs to be provided leading up to mid-block crossings. Road Lighting (Refer to B): A: Mid-block Crossing Signal Layout Street lighting to be provided as per NDoT Pedestrian Guideline Standard. Kerb Transitions (Refer to C): Kerb ramps must be implemented at all crossing points to accommodate for wheelchair users and sight impaired pedestrians. C: Kerb-Ramp Details B: Lighting of Mid-Block Crossings Application Areas: High volume pedestrian crossing points that occur mid-block between two land-use attractors or where intersection spacing is longer than 300m apart. 115

A: Pedestrian Signal Scramble Phase Intersection Crossings: Pedestrian Signal Applications: Three types of pedestrian signal applications are recommended for precinct intersections: Standard Pedestrian Phase Scramble Pedestrian Phase (Refer to A) Early Start Pedestrian Phase Intersection and Signal Layout (Refer to B): B: Intersection and Signal Layout Provide signalized pedestrian crossings at all Class 3 route intersections with S11 signal heads and pedestrian demand pushbuttons. Audible signals to be implemented for sight impaired road users. RTM 3 pedestrian crossing lines to be implemented (minimum width 1.5m / desirable width 3m) Interlocking pavers or coloured asphalt is recommended at Class 2 junctions serving as gateways to the precinct (indicates higher pedestrian volumes and entrance to the precincts). Staged crossings should be considered. Minimum median width for staged crossings 2m. Road Lighting (Refer to C): Street lighting to be provided as per NDoT Pedestrian Guideline Standard. C: Intersection Lighting Staged Intersection Crossing Dimensions Kerb Transitions (Refer to D): D: Kerb Transitions Kerb ramps must be implemented at all crossing points to accommodate for wheelchair users and sight impaired pedestrians. 116

Application Areas: Road intersection between Class 3 roads and any other road class (Generally Class 3 or 4) NB: Provide pedestrian crossings on left-slip lanes where high vehicle speeds conflict with pedestrian crossings. 117

A: Class 3 Pedestrian / Cycle Ways PLAN VIEW Pedestrian and Cycle Ways: Layout and Geometry (Refer to A): Walkways and cycle to be provided adjacent to all Class 3 Roads (these facilities should always be separated from the roadway itself by means of a buffer strip minimum 1.0m / desirable 3m). Walkway and cycle way also separated because of speed differential of modes (Barrier Kerb 0.3m). All existing lateral obstructions should be removed from the walkway / cycle way area. Design Dimensions Walkway (Refer to B) Cycle way (Refer to B) PERSPECTIVE VIEW Gradient 5% Gradient 5% Minimum Width 1.2m Minimum Width 1.5m Desirable width 1.8m Desirable width 1.8m Lateral clearance 0.1m Height clearance 2.1m Lateral clearance 0.5m Height clearance 2.1m Buffer strip 0.6m Buffer strip 0.6m B: Geometry and Design Dimensions B: Geometry and Design Dimensions Surfacing: Surfacing should be conducive to movement of able bodied users and users with disabilities. Gratings and covers opening 12mm. Edges Edges should be defined visually and tactile. Handrails to be implemented where vertical drop of 0.8m with slope steeper than 1:2 (50%) occurs within 1.2m from edge. C: Lighting along walkways and cycle ways Lighting (Refer to C): Lighting should be provided along all walkways and cycle ways for safety and security as well as night-time operational reasons. Application Areas (Refer to D and E): 118

Adjacent to all Class 3 roads Facilities (walkways and cycle ways) to be aligned to crossing points at intersections and mid-block crossings. E: Walkways at Activity Centres D: Walkways along Urban Links 119