PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN

Similar documents
Pocatello Regional Transit Master Transit Plan Draft Recommendations

City of Davenport CitiBus Public Transportation Study. April 2015

Planning Regionally With Transit

Dear City Council Members,

Service Proposal for the City of Ashland, Oregon

Intermodal Connections with Light Rail in Phoenix, AZ Wulf Grote, P.E. Director, Planning & Development

Cobb Community Transit

TRANSIT & NON-MOTORIZED PLAN DRAFT FINAL REPORT Butte County Association of Governments

Community Transit Solutions for the Suburbs APTA Annual Meeting Steve Fittante, New Jersey Transit Corporation September 30, 2013

Market Factors and Demand Analysis. World Bank

Roanoke Valley TRANSIT VISION PLAN

ROUTES 55 / 42 / 676 BUS RAPID TRANSIT LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE

2. Context. Existing framework. The context. The challenge. Transport Strategy

Public Consultation Centre For. Transportation Master Plan Update. Information Package

Rochester Area Bike Sharing Program Study

To secure Council approval for a pilot expansion of Transit service to the villages of St. Davids and Queenston.

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Transportation Master Plan Advisory Task Force

VI. Market Factors and Deamnd Analysis

Transit Workshop with MPO Board

Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:

Vision to Action Community Coalition February 14, 2014 Briefing

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

4 Ridership Growth Study

ANNUAL REPORT Portland Streetcar 2016

Berkeley Strategic Transportation Plan A-76

Transportation in Washoe County. Lee Gibson, Executive Director February 15, 2011

Typical Rush Hour Commute. PennyforTransportation.com

MORE CONNECTIONS. Redesigning routes for the future of transit in Milwaukee County.

SFMTA s Services for Seniors and People with Disabilities. San Francisco Municipal Transportation Board July 17, 2018

Where We Live and Work Today

Craig Rempp, Transit Superintendent Mary Karlsson, Kimley-Horn. Mankato City Council Meeting 6/25/2018

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE SUBJECT: UPDATE ON DODGER STADIUM SHUTTLE SERVICE FOR THE 2009 BASEBALL SEASON (CF )

Cherry Creek Transportation and Land Use Forum September 25, 2013 Meeting Summary

MASTER BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN

The Vine: Mill Plain Bus Rapid Transit Project Open House Summary August 2018

Capital Improvement Project Application: Bike Racks, Bus Stop Shelters, Sidewalks in Kings Canyon/Ventura Corridor Page 1 of 10

Title VI Fare Change Equity Analysis

Tulsa Metropolitan Area LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Capital Metro Monthly Ridership Report September 2017 (Fiscal Year-end 2017)

Bus Rapid Transit ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS. Open House

Cape Cod Regional Transit Authority Comprehensive Service Assessment. December 2015

City of Novi Non-Motorized Master Plan 2011 Executive Summary

Characteristics from these programs were used to compare to and evaluate existing conditions in Howard County.

Executive Summary. TUCSON TRANSIT ON BOARD ORIGIN AND DESTINATION SURVEY Conducted October City of Tucson Department of Transportation

May 12, 2016 Metro Potential Ballot Measure Issue Brief: Local Return

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Ave

Fare-Free Transit A Strategy for Sustainable Transportation. Antonio D'Alessandro, M.E.Des. Paper prepared for presentation

Prince George s County Council Retreat January 5, 2017

Regional Transportation Needs Within Southeastern Wisconsin

Bus Riders of Saskatoon Meeting with City of Saskatoon Utility Services Department October 23, :30pm 2:30pm th Street West, Saskatoon

Chapter 5. Complete Streets and Walkable Communities.

HOW WOULD YOU MAKE TRANSIT BETTER?

Dial a Ride. City of Kawartha Lakes ACCELERATING RURAL TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS. Case Study

Purpose and Need. Chapter Introduction. 2.2 Project Purpose and Need Project Purpose Project Need

ABOUT THIS STUDY The Tenderloin-Little Saigon Community-Based Transportation Plan

PURPOSE AND NEED SUMMARY 54% Corridor Need 1. Corridor Need 2. Corridor Need 3. Corridor Need 4. Corridor Need 5

Transportation and Equity: A 2017 Agenda for Candidates

PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN

CHAPTER 7.0 IMPLEMENTATION

Transportation Authority of Marin Renew Existing ½-cent Transportation Sales Tax

Multi-Modal Transportation Assessment and Development Strategy. January 13, 2014 Madison County Commission Meeting

Ridership Growth Strategy. Presentation to the board & beyond 1

Working with School Bus Operators to Provide Community Transportation

DIRECTION REGARDING WEHO PEDALS BIKE SHARE PROGRAM AND DOCKLESS BIKE SHARE PILOT MAYOR PRO TEMPORE JOHN D' AMICO COUNCILMEMBER LAUREN MEISTER

Solana Beach Comprehensive Active Transportation Strategy (CATS)

REPORT. RECOMMENDATION: 1. That the report on Pilot Results Free Transit for Seniors, dated October 25, 2012, from Oakville Transit be received.

CITY OF HAMILTON PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Transit Division

Peterborough Council on Aging

Key objectives of the survey were to gain a better understanding of:

North Coast Corridor:

2018 Transportation Survey October 17, Prepared by:

Performance Criteria for 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan

Everett Transit Action Plan. Community Open House November 16, 2015

Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council

Practicing what we preach in POMONA! Daryl Grigsby, Public Works Director, City of Pomona, California

Vision Public Workshop: Findings

Semi-Annual DC Circulator Forum. February 25, 2014

Board Strategy Day. January 25, 2018

Appendix C 3. Bicycle / Pedestrian Planning

Addressing Bicycle Capacity Issues on Public Transportation

Technical Working Group November 15, 2017

Board-Approved Funding Awards for Cycle 4 Active Transportation Grant Program Projects (in Order of Project Rankings) Approved on

1999 On-Board Sacramento Regional Transit District Survey

Most Important Part of any Plan

TRANSIT RIDERSHIP IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAPITAL PROJECTS OPERATING PLANS - NEXT NETWORK TRANSIT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

GOLD COAST TRANSIT DISTRICT SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN FY 2015 FY 2019 APPENDICES

NACTO Designing Cities 2014 Dongho Chang, City Traffic Engineer October 23, 2014

Rhode Island Moving Forward Long-Range Transportation Plan 2040 Municipal Roundtable Newport County

Hurricane to Zion Canyon Transit Study

JAUNT in Albemarle County FY11

Memorandum. Fund Allocation Fund Programming Policy/Legislation Plan/Study Capital Project Oversight/Delivery Budget/Finance Contract/Agreement Other:

Fiscal Year Budget Overview

EASTERN SHORE ALTERNATIVE TRANSPORTATION MODE STUDY FOR DISABLED, ELDERLY, LOW-INCOME, AND YOUTH POPULATION

RESTRICTED ROADS (20 MPH SPEED LIMIT) (SCOTLAND) BILL. 1. Is reducing the speed limit to 20mph the best way of achieving the aims of the Bill?

FACTS AND FIGURES: MAKING THE CASE FOR COMPLETE STREETS IN LEE COUNTY

WHITE PAPER: TRANSIT SERVICE FOR SOUTH SHAGANAPPI

9. Parking Supporting Statement

Summary of Feedback Received during Speak Up Broward s 22 Speakers Bureau Engagements from December 10, 2013 through April 2, 2014

Capital Metro Monthly Ridership Report March 2018 (Fiscal Year 2018)

Transcription:

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN PRESENTATION TO CITY COUNCIL JANUARY 22, 2008

PUBLIC TRANSIT FOR THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN LOCAL SERVICE For Georgetown residents to Georgetown destinations. Local fixed-route service ties the community together Riders include: youth, elderly, persons with disabilities, low income residents and anyone that chooses not to drive Works well in similar sized cities in Texas and across the nation: San Marcos, Killeen, and Texarkana, for example

PUBLIC TRANSIT IS GOOD FOR GEORGETOWN Good for Business and the Local Economy Brings customers to businesses Brings people to work Studies show that public transit provides significant economic benefits to the community Enhances the business climate Good for the Environment Clean burning, home-grown propane fueled buses Reduces oil consumption, emissions and is environmentally friendly

Vision for Georgetown Public Transportation Taking people to work, school, medical facilities shopping, recreation and other activities: Residents and visitors to the City of Georgetown will be able to move throughout the City safely, reliably, efficiently, and affordably by using a seamless network of transit services that are easy to comprehend, responsive to individual travel needs, and easy to access.

THE PLANNING PROCESS Advisory committee made up of residents and representatives of a wide range of organizations Reviewed demographics, travel patterns and existing services The committee concluded that fixed route service is essential for success Committee determined that CARTS would be the best and most appropriate provider

PUBLIC OUTREACH Extensive Public Comments: Advisory committee met monthly Three public meetings the week of January7th Over 100 people attended the three meetings Overwhelming support for transit Excellent comments changes were made Web site posting Each of the working documents has been posted Comments were received

CAPITAL AREA RURAL TRANSIT SERVICE CARTS, as the regional transit system, has served Georgetown for 28 years. It is recommended that they operate service: Nationally recognized as innovative, cost effective and advanced in the use of technology Strong culture of safety and reliability - High professional standards with well trained drivers Potential access to Federal transit funding Low-cost service

SERVICE GUIDELINES Proposed Service Days and Hours 6:30 AM to 8 PM Monday through Friday; 8 AM to 8 PM Saturday is optional. Vehicles 4 fully accessible vehicles in service operating in ½ hour and one hour service frequencies. Bus Stops Approximately every ¼ mile with benches, bike racks and shelters as appropriate Selecting a Transfer Center The transfer center will be placed downtown. Fare $1.00 with the first month free fare. Half fare for seniors, persons with disabilities and students. ADA Complementary Paratransit Service will be available for persons that cannot get to or ride fixed route due to a disability.

POTENTIAL RIDERSHIP Ridership projections are based on experience in similar cities initiating new service. Modest Goals Initially modest ridership goals should be set, allowing the service time to build a customer base, like any other business. Initial ridership will generate a productivity of approximately 6-8 one way passenger trips per vehicle per hour. After system maturity (3 5 years) ridership should grow to 10 12 one way passenger trips per vehicle hour

ESTIMATED BUDGET OPERATIONS Operating Budget: Service Hours 14,664 Cost per Hour $50 Operating Cost (fixed route) $733,200 Operating Cost (paratransit) $186,030 Operating Revenue Fare Box Revenue (12%) $ 87,984 CARTS (Paratransit) $186,030 Advertising/Sponsors $645,216 City of Georgetown and Federal/State Funds,

ESTIMATED BUDGET CAPITAL Capital Expenses: Five Vehicles $500,000 Benches/ Shelters, Signs $103,000 Transit Hub $ 35,000 Capital Revenue: CARTS Federal/State (80%) $400,000 CARTS Bus Match $100,000 Local Funds (City, Sponsors) $138,000

FINANCIAL SUMMARY - RESOURCES No Federal or state funding for expansion at this time Efforts will be made to secure Federal and State discretionary funds (50% match). There are no guarantees this will be successful Sponsorships and advertising revenue from the private sector could account for 10 20 percent of funding requirements Much of the initial funding will have to come from the city

PROPOSED ROUTES Provide coverage throughout the city Timed transfer routes meet downtown for quick, easy transfer, when needed. Most routes operate every hour Shopper Shuttle on ½ hour service frequency Serves most neighborhoods, businesses, schools, medical facilities, shopping, human services and recreation. Compromises Funding realities limit the capabilities of transit. The areas that generate the most ridership or have the greatest needs were prioritized.

Proposed Routes: Major Origins and Destinations

Proposed Routes: Service Area

Proposed East Route Proposed East Route Information Time Between Buses: 1 Hour Total Time: 1/2 Hour Round Trip Mileage (Round Trip): 8 Miles Annual Ridership (at Maturity): 18,645 One-Way Passenger Trips Daily Productivity: 10 One-Way Passenger Trips per Vehicle Hour

Proposed Southeast Route Proposed Southeast Route Information Time Between Buses: 1 Hour Total Time: 1/2 Hour Round Trip Mileage (Round Trip): 5.4 Miles Annual Ridership (at Maturity): 18,645 One-Way Passenger Trips Daily Productivity: 10 One-Way Passenger Trips per Vehicle Hour

Proposed Southwest Route Proposed Southwest Route Information Time between Buses: 1 Hour Total Time: 1/2 Hour Round Trip Mileage (Round Trip): 8.6 Miles Annual Ridership (at Maturity): 22,374 One-Way Passenger Trips Daily Productivity: 12 One-Way Passenger Trips per Vehicle Hour

Proposed Shopper Shuttle Route Proposed Shopper Shuttle Route Information Time between Buses: 1/2 Hour Total Time: 1/2 Hour Round Trip Mileage (Round Trip): 7.7 Miles Annual Ridership (at Maturity): 44,748 One-Way Passenger Trips Daily Productivity: 12 One-Way Passenger Trips per Vehicle Hour

Proposed Sun City Route Proposed Sun City Route Information Time between Buses: 1 Hour Total Time: 1 Hour Round Trip Mileage (Round Trip): 20.4 Miles Annual Ridership (at Maturity): 37,290 One-Way Passenger Trips Daily Productivity: 10 One-Way Passenger Trips per Vehicle Hour

Proposed North Route Proposed North Route Information Time between Buses: 1 Hour Total Time: 1/2 Hour Round Trip Mileage (Round Trip): 8.1 Miles Annual Ridership (at Maturity): 18,645 One-Way Passenger Trips Daily Productivity: 10 One-Way Passenger Trips per Vehicle Hour