ISSF GUIDE. FOR NON-ENTANGLING FADs

Similar documents
2 nd MEETING OF THE FAD MANAGEMENT OPTIONS INTERSESSIONAL WORKING GROUP Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia September 2016

Mitigation of Silky Shark Bycatch in Tropical Tuna Purse Seine Fisheries

Good Practices for Responsible Tuna Purse-Seining

EU initiatives on FAD research

Good Practices for Responsible Tuna Purse-Seining

Time to deliver precautionary tuna fisheries management

The Spanish Fish Aggregating Device Management Plan from ABSTRACT

Morena G. 1, J. Murua 2 and V. Restrepo 1

INTER-AMERICAN TROPICAL TUNA COMMISSION

ADVANCES IN THE USE OF ENTANGLEMENT-REDUCING DRIFTING FISH AGGREGATING DEVICES (DFADS) IN TUNA PURSE SEINE FLEETS

DESIGN OF ECOLOGICAL FADS

Yellowfin Tuna, Indian Ocean, Troll/ pole and line

A SUMMARY OF BYCATCH ISSUES AND ISSF Mitigation Activities To Date in Purse Seine Fisheries, with Emphasis on FADs

Marine pollution originating from purse seine and longline fishing vessel operations in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean,

Progress Made by Tuna Regional Fisheries Management Organizations (RFMOs)

82 ND MEETING RESOLUTION C RESOLUTION ON THE PROCESS FOR IMPROVED COMPLIANCE OF RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED BY THE COMMISSION

IOTC Agreement Article X. Report of Implementation for the year 2016

Policy Priorities for the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission

IOTC-2018-CoC15-CR09 Rev1 [E] IOTC Compliance Report for: Iran Report produced on: 12/04/2018

2006 Grand Prize Winner ($25,000)

REPUBLIC OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS. FISHING LICENSE (THIRD IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENT) REGULATIONS OF 2009 (Title 51 MIRC ) ARRANGEMENT OF REGULATION

Report of Implementation for the year 2014

YELLOWFIN TUNA (Thunnus albacares)

Main resolutions and recommendations relating to straddling species adopted by regional fisheries management organizations and implemented by Mexico

WORKING GROUP ON STOCK ASSESSMENTS 5 TH MEETING DOCUMENT SAR-5-08 TARGET SIZE FOR THE TUNA FLEET IN THE EASTERN PACIFIC OCEAN

IOTC-2017-CoC14-CR17 [E] IOTC Compliance Report for: Mauritius Report produced on: 15/04/2017

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE TENTH REGULAR SESSION. Majuro, Republic of the Marshall Islands 6-14 August 2014

COORDINATING WORKING PARTY ON FISHERY STATISTICS. Nineteenth Session. Noumea, New Caledonia, July 2001 AGENCY REPORT.

Tri Marine and Responsibly Caught Tuna. April 23, 2014 Matt Owens Director, Environmental Policy and Social Responsibility

Directorate General of Capture Fisheries Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries

- for training purposes only - US Tuna II. for training purposes only

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE THIRD REGULAR SESSION August 2007 Honolulu, United States of America

The use of Traditional FADs in Thai Fisheries and the Review of it's possibility to Apply in IOTC area. Abstract

April 7, 2017 (10:23 AM)

8 TH MEETING DOCUMENT BYC-08 INF-A

IOTC-2018-CoC15-CR10 [E] IOTC Compliance Report for: Japan Report produced on: 12/04/2018

Size selectivity of tuna purse seine nets estimated from FAD sets data

82 ND MEETING RESOLUTION C RESOLUTION TO MITIGATE THE IMPACT ON SEABIRDS OF FISHING FOR SPECIES COVERED BY THE IATTC

National Report on Large Whale Entanglements

Presenting Scientists: GALA MORENO & JEFFERSON MURUA, assisted by Papa Kebe SKIPPERS WORKSHOPSCOMMENTS + NEW IDEAS

An analysis of the uses, impacts and benefits of fish aggregating devices (FADs) in the global tuna industry

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE SEVENTH REGULAR SESSION August 2011 Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia

SOMALIA National Report to the Scientific Committee of the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission, 2015

Albacore Tuna, South Pacific, Troll, Pole and Line

SOUTH PACIFIC COMMISSION. TWENTY-SECOND REGIONAL TECHNICAL MEETING ON FISHERIES (Noumea, New Caledonia, 6-10 August 1990)

2016 : STATUS SUMMARY FOR SPECIES OF TUNA AND TUNA-LIKE SPECIES UNDER THE IOTC MANDATE, AS WELL AS OTHER SPECIES IMPACTED BY IOTC FISHERIES.

NINTH MEETING DOCUMENT SAC-09-16

Summary of Preliminary Results of Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis, 2018

IOTC Agreement Article X. Report of Implementation for the year 2016

The Extended Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna,

MARKING OF FISHING GEAR


Neritic Tunas from Purse Seine Fishery in the Andaman Sea Coast of Thailand, Thailand Thailand

WORKING GROUP ON STOCK ASSESSMENTS 5 TH MEETING DOCUMENT SAR-5-05 BET A

Characterization of the Sole Fishery in The Gambia. Gambia-Senegal Sustainable Fisheries Program (Ba Nafaa)

1. At WCPFC10 in adopting CMM the Secretariat was tasked with preparing a report for consideration by the SC, TCC and Commission in 2014.

TACKLING GHOST GEAR AT SCALE

Certification and defining the Unit of Assessment

Gregg Yan/ WWF POSITION STATEMENT JULY. Ocean Practice

Fishing Capacity and Efficient Fleet Configuration for the Tuna Purse Seine Fishery in the Eastern Pacific Ocean: An Economic Approach

The Commission for the Conservation and Management of Highly Migratory Fish Stocks in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean

Albacore tuna, Bigeye tuna, Blackfin tuna, Skipjack tuna, Yellowfin tuna. Image Monterey Bay Aquarium. Atlantic. Purse Seine.

Name: Morgan Kammerer Topic: Unsustainable Fishing Methods

Options for Differential Management and Monitoring of Seabird Bycatch

WORKING GROUP TO PROMOTE AND PUBLICIZE THE AIDCP DOLPHIN SAFE TUNA CERTIFICATION SYSTEM

ICCAT SCRS Report (PLE-104) Panel 1- Tropical tunas. ICCAT Commission Marrakech

***This summary does not include shad and herring net requirements.***

PROPOSAL IATTC-92 B-4 REVISED SUBMITTED BY BELIZE, GUATEMALA, NICARAGUA, COSTA RICA AND PANAMA

SAC-08-10a Staff activities and research plans. 8 a Reunión del Comité Científico Asesor 8 th Meeting of the Scientific Advisory Committee

1. What is the WCPFC?

Fishery Subsidies: Japan

LDRAC position on FAD management

DEVELOPMENT OF SUBSURFACE FADS IN THE PACIFIC ISLANDS REGION, INCLUDING DEPLOYMENT OF TWO SUBSURFACE FADS IN NEW CALEDONIA

Draft best practice mitigation guidelines for sharks and rays taken in purseseine and long-line fisheries

The Role of Regional Fishery Bodies (RFBs) in Combating IUU Fishing. Dr. Gail Lugten OECD Paris, April 2014.

Eastern Tuna and Billfish Fishery Sea Turtle Mitigation Plan (TMP)

Fishery Resource Grant Program Final Report 2010

FISHING LICENCE (FAD CLOSURE) REGULATIONS 2009

Wild caught sustainable seafood

THE DEVELOPMENT, DESIGN AND RECENT STATUS OF ANCHORED AND DRIFTING FADS IN THE WCPO

Mooring Modifications for the Reduction of Losses to Vandalism

Tuna Dolphin Controversy

RESOLUTION 15/04 CONCERNING THE IOTC RECORD OF VESSELS AUTHORISED TO OPERATE IN THE IOTC AREA OF

NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE REPORT

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE SIXTH REGULAR SESSION. Nuku alofa, Tonga August 2010

Intersessional Working Group Regional Observer Programme September 2007 WCPFC MINIMUM DATA STANDARDS FOR REGIONAL OBSERVER PROGRAMME (DRAFT)

Trials of a Net Grid for the UK Nephrops trawl fisheries

TECHNICAL CONSULTATION ON THE MARKING OF FISHING GEAR. Rome, Italy, 5 9 February Project summary of:

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE TENTH REGULAR SESSION. Majuro, Republic of the Marshall Islands 6-14 August 2014

4. From log fishing to fishing on fish aggregating devices

2018 COM Doc. No. COC-307B/ 2018 November 18, 2018 (3:11 PM)

SUPPLEMENT to the Solomon Islands Gazette

COMMISSION THIRTEENTH REGULAR SESSION Denarau Island, Fiji 5 9 December, 2016

Proposals for improved figures in the tropical tunas executive summaries

2016 West Coast Entanglement Summary

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE TENTH REGULAR SESSION. Majuro, Republic of the Marshall Islands 6-14 August 2014

Management advisory for the Bay of Bengal Indian mackerel fishery

SCTB15 Working Paper NFR 7. Fiji tuna and billfish fisheries. Jone Amoe. Fisheries Division, Ministry of Fisheries and Forests Fiji

Progress Report on the EPO Silky Shark Stock Assessment

Update on recent modifications of fishing gear and fishing procedures to reduce bycatch of sea turtles in longline fishery

Transcription:

ISSF GUIDE FOR NON-ENTANGLING FADs

INTRODUCTION ISSF Photo: David Itano Drifting FAD showing netting suspended from the surface float Since ISSF first published its Guide for Non-entangling FADs (fish aggregating devices) in 2012, several tuna fishing fleets have experimented with and adopted the use of the new FAD designs described therein in an effort to reduce shark and/or turtle entanglement. In addition, new research studies on FAD entanglement have been published and tuna regional fisheries management organizations (trfmos) have passed recommendations regarding non-entangling FADs. Considering these developments, and based on the findings of a recent workshop organized by ISSF, ISSF is publishing an updated Guide for Non-entangling FADs. A significant update to ISSF guidance on non-entangling FAD design concerns mesh size in nets and net use in general. Some scientists and fishers previously assumed that using small mesh netting or tying up netting into bundles would potentially eliminate entanglements. Observing these designs in use in fishing operations, however, revealed that while entanglements were less frequent, they were not eliminated. Turtles can easily become entangled in any netting covering the bamboo rafts. Bundles of netting tied up and suspended under a FAD can unravel, and small mesh can tear, creating larger holes in which sharks or turtles have been observed to become entangled. Because our goal is to eliminate the risk of entanglement altogether and any unnecessary mortality, it is clear that previous designs referring to smaller mesh netting are only partial solutions. Going forward, only FADs constructed with no netting will be considered non-entangling with minimal risk of entanglement. Relatively inexpensive and readily available alternatives ropes suspending into the water and shade cloth or canvas materials used to cover rafts are reported to work equally well by fleets that have tested these alternative materials. The use of biodegradable materials in construction of FADs to reduce unnecessary pollution in the sea is also endorsed. In summary, this document presents updated recommendations on FAD designs and materials to consider using for their construction, so as to minimize unwanted by-catch and pollution of the oceans caused by deployments of FADs worldwide in today s purse seine tuna fisheries.

WHAT IS A FAD? Many fish species, including tunas, associate with floating objects in the ocean. There are two main types of floating objects; natural (flotsam) and man-made (jetsam). Man-made floating objects specifically constructed to attract fish (and also natural objects that are found by fishermen and modified) are called FADs. They can be anchored or drifting. Drifting FADs (DFADs) are often equipped with a satellite transmitting buoy to enable their relocation. Anchored FADs (AFADs) (called payaos in some regions) are commonly used by artisanal and sport fisheries but also by industrial pole-and-line and purse seine vessels in some regions such as in the western Pacific Ocean and the Maldives Islands in the Indian Ocean. However, the industrial tuna purse seine fleets around the world primarily use DFADs. ISSF Photo: Jeff Muir Netting suspended beneath a drifting FAD tied into a "sausage" can still entangle sharks if they become untied

SHARK AND TURTLE INTERACTIONS WITH DFADS Sharks and turtles are among the numerous species of marine life that are often found associated with DFADs. In some instances, turtles become entangled in the netting on the DFAD rafts, and turtles and sharks become entangled in the netting suspended beneath the rafts. The main shark species that often associate with floating objects are the silky shark (Carcharhinus falciformis) and, to a lesser extent, the oceanic white tip shark (C. longimanus). Sharks can become accidentally entangled in the submerged netting of the DFAD, even when the netting is tied up in bundles ( sausages ) if these begin to unravel or untie (Figure 1.a). Small mesh net can reduce chances of shark entanglement, but after long periods of time at sea the net will start to break down and larger holes appear with greater potential to entangle sharks (Figure 1.b.). Several turtle species can be found around floating objects depending on area, the most common being the olive ridley sea turtle (Lepidochelys olivacea). While turtles can get trapped in the submerged netting, they can also entangle when they climb on the floating structure (Figure 1.c). The turtle s claws can easily become ensnared in the mesh panels covering the raft. Covering the raft with netting and putting cloth or tarpaulin on top is not a solution, because when those fabrics degrade the underlying netting becomes exposed. The proportions of turtles that become entangled with DFADs but escape, and those that become permanently entangled, are currently unknown. In the eastern Pacific, only around 1% of DFADs that are set on by purse seiners have turtles entangled, and many of those are released alive. Figure1.a Sharks entangled in large ISSF Photo: Fabien Forget mesh netting beneath a DFAD ISSF Photo: David Itano Figure 1.b Small mesh netting suspended beneath DFADs degrades over time, creating larger holes in the net ISSF Photo: Fabien Forget Figure 1.c. Turtle entangled in large mesh netting adjacent to the raft of a DFAD.

Recently three of the four trfmos responsible for the conservation and management of tropical tunas have adopted resolutions that contain regulations and recommendations regarding the use of non-entangling FADs by purse seine fleets. NON-ENTANGLING FAD REGULATIONS DOCUMENT C-13-04 13/08 RFMO IATTC IOTC WEB LINK https://www.iattc.org/pdffiles2/resolutions/c-13-04-fads.pdf http://www.iotc.org/cmm/resolution-1308-procedures-fish-aggregatingdevices-fads-management-plan-including-more-detailed Rec. 14-01 ICCAT https://www.iccat.int/documents/recs/compendiopdf-e/2014-01-e.pdf NA WCPFC NA In addition, in most tuna purse seine fishing regions, observers working under trfmos, now record the types and configuration of FADs used by fishers (e.g. FAD size, construction materials, design, entanglement incidents) in specific log sheets. This information is important for scientists to assess the efficiency of different designs in reducing FAD entanglements. The collection and recycling of old FADs by fishers can also help reduce the environmental impact of this gear.

Although the design and development of functional non-entangling FADs should continue by the industry, considering the expertise of fishermen, some suggested guidelines for consideration in the construction of non-entangling FADs are presented below: BEST PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS To reduce entanglement of turtles on the rafts of FADs, the surface structure should not be covered with any netting or meshed materials. If a sub-surface or submerged component is used, it should not be made from netting but from non-meshed materials such as ropes, canvas or cloth sheets. A recent trend has developed in which fishers are using plastic or metal frames to build FAD rafts. To reduce the amount of synthetic marine debris being introduced into the oceans the use of natural and/or biodegradable materials such as bamboo, palm leaves, coconut fiber, or sisal among others, should be promoted. More than two years have passed since fishers began experimenting with and using so-called non-entangling DFADs constructed with netting. Only FADs constructed without netting can eliminate the unintentional entanglement of turtles and sharks and be considered non-entangling. Some skippers report good performance in attracting and catching tuna aggregations at DFADs constructed without any netting.

Considering the variety of designs and materials used in construction of FADs worldwide the ISSF Bycatch Steering Committee proposes a ranking of FADs according to the risk of entanglement associated with each design. Starting from highest to lowest risk of entanglement, four categories are described and illustrated examples provided of FAD designs: HIGHEST ENTANGLEMENT RISK FADs: RAFT LOWER ENTANGLEMENT RISK FADs: RAFT NON-ENTANGLING FADS: NYLON OR CANVAS BLACK SHADE CLOTH COVER BIODEGRADABLE NON-ENTANGLING FADS: LARGE MESH SMALL MESH RAFT LARGE MESH NET WEBBING TIED IN SAUSAGES SMALL MESH ROPES ROPE CLOTH ATTRACTORS MADE OF ALL BIODEGRADABLE MATERIALS WEIGHTS WEIGHTS Constructed with any netting materials, including old purse seine netting, used to cover rafts or suspended beneath in open panels These DFADs are known to cause entanglements with turtles and sharks Only small mesh netting used (e.g. < 2.5 inch (7 cm) stretched mesh) Rafts are tightly wrapped with small mesh netting, with no loose netting hanging from it The underwater structure is tightly tied into bundles (sausages) A single panel can be used instead of bundles, but the panel must be weighted to keep it taut No netting is used in their construction The raft is not covered or covered with shade cloth or canvas The subsurface structure is made with ropes, canvas or nylon sheets, or other non-entangling materials These FADs are expected to have minimum risk of causing entanglement In addition to having minimal risk of entanglement, they are constructed exactly like other non-entangling FADS, but using only natural and/or biodegradable materials, further reducing the environmental impact of DFADs on the oceans The panel should consist of either netting with a stretched mesh of 2.5 inches (7 cm) or less, or a solid sheet (e.g., canvas or nylon) HIGHEST RISK Despite using netting, these design elements reduce the risk of entanglement events LOWEST RISK