Trip Generation for an averaged sized elementary school in Provo, Utah

Similar documents
Traffic Impact Memorandum. May 22, 2018

2016 APS Go! Surveys Summary Results for Oakridge Elementary School

Camosun College Modal Split

Arlington Public Schools Thomas Jefferson Site Evaluation Transportation Networks. Thomas Jefferson Working Group Meeting #6 November 10, 2014

San Ramon Elementary School. Travel Plan

2016 APS Go! Surveys Summary Results for Arlington Traditional School

Niantic Center Elementary School

January Project No

Appendix C. NORTH METRO STATION AREA TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT 88th Avenue Station

National Safe Routes to School Program: Initial Results

Durrance Elementary School

James Williams Middle School 915 Acacia Lane

Transportation Impact Assessment

MONTGOMERY COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE STUDENT PICK-UP / DROP-OFF PROCEDURE CHANGES

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM. Introduction

Meadow Woods Elementary School

Existing Transportation System

Overland Traffic Consultants, Inc. October 15, Mr. Bruce McBride Project Delivery Analysts, LLC Shawnee Street Moorpark, CA 93021

Abingdon Elementary School School Transportation Report

SCHOOL ROUTE PLAN. For HUNTER S CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL LOCATION 14 ORANGE COUNTY. Prepared for:

HENDERSON DEVELOPMENT 213, 217, 221, 221 ½, 223 HENDERSON AVENUE and 65 TEMPLETON STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW.

Safe Routes to School Comprehensive Plan

Vallecito Elementary School. Travel Plan

Traffic Circulation & Pedestrian Safety Study

Drag and drop pic and stretch/crop to the limits of the blue rectangle (delete this text box) Maxey Elementary School

VIVA RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES OAKVILLE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

DART Bus Crash Analysis. typical scenarios associated with selected crash types

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL

CONNECTING PEOPLE TO PLACES

NATIONAL HOSPITAL OF SRI LANKA TRAFFIC ANALYSIS OF DEVELOPMENT MASTER-PLAN

UBC Vancouver Transportation Status Report Fall 2014

APS Stratford Project Transportation Analysis Overview. Stratford BLPC #5 June 1, 2015

Roundabouts vs. All- Way Stop-Controlled Intersections

Clyde Brown Elementary School Millis, MA

Magnolia Place. Traffic Impact Analysis. Prepared for: City of San Mateo. Prepared by: Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

South Albion-Bolton Community Plan North Hill Supermarket Transportation Study Part B: Evaluation of Alternatives

Shockoe Bottom Preliminary Traffic and Parking Analysis

School Travel Survey for District Superintendents/Board Chairs

2016 APS Go! Surveys Summary Results for Trades Center

Windy Ridge Elementary School

Lake Whitney Elementary School

AMHERST EXEMPTED VILLAGE SCHOOLS AND SAINT JOSEPH SCHOOL

Existing Transportation System

CLEAN COMMUTE WEEK TOOLKIT

Traffic Impact Study. Westlake Elementary School Westlake, Ohio. TMS Engineers, Inc. June 5, 2017

CPC Parking Lot Riverside Drive. Transportation Rationale

Orange Center Elementary School

Transportation Impact Study for Abington Terrace

Wellington Exempted Village School District SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL TRAVEL PLAN January 2014

U NIVERSITY OF B RITISH C OLUMBIA. Fall 2010 Transportation Status Report

Provo City Transportation Master Plan

Hidden Oaks Elementary School

Truck Climbing Lane Traffic Justification Report

A Safe Routes to School Survey in Hillsborough County

Congestion Management Report

Cycle journeys on the South-West City Way: a descriptive analysis. Karen McPherson. Glasgow Centre for Population Health

LTAC: Katie Mencarini, Central & Hampton Roads streets and a fifteen minute debrief to discuss the findings. Participants walked along Mill Road

Controlled. Semi-Controlled PAGE 01 CHAPTER 12 INTERSECTIONS

C/CAG. Sunnybrae Elementary School Walking and Bicycling Audit. San Mateo-Foster City School District JUNE 2013

Ref. No February 19, Ms. Ashley Blissett, P. Eng., Senior Development Engineer City of Halifax PO Box 1749 HALIFAX NS B3J 3A5

ATTACHMENT NO. 11. RRLRT No. 2. Railroad / Light Rail Transit Technical Committee TECHNICAL COMMITTEE: Busway Grade Crossings STATUS/DATE OF ACTION

Hedgepeth Williams Middle School and Paul Robeson Elementary School Trenton, NJ. School Travel Plan

Public Involvement Meeting Tuesday, June 13, Albany Shaker Road Corridor Study

TAKOMA METRO STATION

US 41 COMPLETE STREETS CORRIDOR PLANNING STUDY from University Parkway to Whitfield Avenue

THE LANDMARK AT TALBOT PARK

Chapter 3.9 Timbercrest Elementary School. Volusia County MPO. November 2008

Any time is train time

Provide Employee Parking

The plan should be reviewed periodically i.e. each term in a school, following incidents or at least annually on other sites.

Patrick Henry School and Recreation Center Project Parking Management Plan for New Facility (Begins January 2019)

CIRCULATION, PARKING AND ALTERNATIVE TRANSPORTATION PLANS

Arlington Public Schools New Elementary School at Thomas Jefferson Site Off-Site Transportation. Thomas Jefferson BLPC / PFRC Meeting July 27, 2016

INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 1660 COMSTOCK ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for:

Transportation-Demand Management Community Presentation

June 3, Attention: David Hogan City of San Mateo 330 W. 2oth Avenue San Mateo, CA 94403

Traffic Assessment for Woodhaven Redevelopment. City of Rome Oneida County, New York. March 2, 2018

HYANNIS, MASSACHUSETTS TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

2 Mark Twain Elementary School Report

School Traffic Concerns?

SCHOOL CROSSING PROTECTION CRITERIA

Service Development 1600 Franklin Street, Oakland CA 94612

CHAPTER 9: SAFETY 9.1 TRAFFIC SAFETY INTERSECTION COLLISIONS

HIGHBURY AVENUE/HAMILTON ROAD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE 1 MAY 14, 2015

U.S. Equities Realty. Luay R. Aboona, PE Principal. Traffic and Parking Evaluation Fourth Presbyterian Church of Chicago Chicago, Illinois

Getting Your SRTS Project Funded. Ryan Snyder

Site Traffic Management Plan - January 2018

Harrah s Station Square Casino

Eliminate on-street parking where it will allow for a dedicated bus only lane %

4.7 Best Route to School Maps and Mapping

Rim Rock Elementary School Walking and Biking Audit

Corporation of the Town of Oakville. December 16, 2013

Good Shepherd Catholic Primary School SPRINGFIELD LAKES Traffic Management Policy

Access BART: TOD and Improved Connections. October 29, 2008

Chapter 4.3 Enterprise Elementary. Volusia County MPO. March Page 7.0

1999 On-Board Sacramento Regional Transit District Survey

Chapter 3 DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS

Planning Transit Operations and Bike Sharing Denver RTD. Bill Van Meter, Assistant General Manager, Planning March 23, 2012

Parent Survey Report: One School in One Data Collection Period

ATTACHMENT 4 - TDM Checklist. TDM Checklist Overview

Transcription:

Trip Generation for an averaged sized elementary school in Provo, Utah Brigham Young University s ITE student chapter conducted a Trip Generation Study to determine the number of trips generated by an average sized elementary school. The data collected represents the average weekday trip generation for Wasatch Elementary School, an elementary school with 80 employees and 629 students. Wasatch Elementary School is located across the street from Brigham Young University. Vehicular traffic can only access the school from the front with a single entrance. Vehicles can exit using two exits onto a major street. Wasatch Elementary backs up to a large public park. Most students are dropped off and those who walk access the school from the back side of the building. Parking is free but is restricted to only those accessing the elementary school. During special school events requiring more parking, access to the school blacktop and basketball courts are opened up allowing for an adequate number of parking stalls for any school event. Use of the blacktop and basketball courts is restricted during the afternoon peak hour and is used as an access point for parents to line up in their vehicles and pick up their children. Two buses in the morning and afternoon are available for students who walk or are not driven by car. Field use to an adjacent field during counts was limited by the cold weather in February when the counts were taken. The Average Trip Generation data is summarized in Table 1 with trip generation rates. AM Peak Hour of Adjacent Street (8:00-9:00 am) PM Peak Hour of Adjacent Street (4:00-5:00 pm) AM Peak Hour of Generator (7:45-8:45 am) PM Peak Hour of Generator (3:00-4:00 pm) Table 1: Average Weekday Trip Generation Data Average Weekday (M-F) Enter Exit Total Generation All Truck All Truck All Truck Rate 190 2 156 2 346 4 42 0 52 0 94 0 199 2 160 2 359 4 100 3 119 3 218 6 A Trip Generation Study was also conducted to determine the trips generated by the elementary school during a day with a special after school activity. The data was collected the day of a school play that involved grades 3 through 6 held during the evening. The summary of the data collected the day of the activity is detailed in Table 2 with generation rates. 0.55 0.15 0.57 0.35

AM Peak Hour of Adjacent Street (8:00-9:00 am) PM Peak Hour of Adjacent Street (4:00-5:00 pm) AM Peak Hour of Generator (7:45-8:45 am) PM Peak Hour of Generator (3:00-4:00 pm) Peak Hour Generator (After School Activity) Table 2: Special After School Activity Day Trip Generation Data Day With After School Activity Enter Exit Total Generation All Truck All Truck All Truck Rate 247 3 189 3 436 6 34 0 52 0 86 0 266 4 186 4 452 8 111 3 135 3 246 6 117 0 52 0 169 0 Under land use code 520, Wasatch Elementary School remains on the high end of the trip generation rates as found in ITE s Trip Generation, 7 th Edition, Volume 3. While the number of students is around average, the number of employees is above average. Some of these are part time employees which accounts for the higher number of employees in comparison to other similar elementary schools. Since a large part of elementary school students live outside of walking distances for elementary school children, it is largely a commuter school. Most students are dropped off by a car or by the bus. This also accounts for the higher trip generation rates as compared to other elementary schools of similar size. There is a discrepancy between the average weekday trip generations and the special after school activity day trip generations. Higher numbers of vehicles during peak hours during the day with the special activity suggests that more parents dropped off their kids on this particular day. There is also time shift of trip generations and an increase of trip generations on the special activity day from the average weekday. It is possible that students needed to arrive earlier on this particular day and therefore did not ride the bus and were dropped off instead. Afternoon trip generations were also increased. Teachers and students left school premises sooner so they could return later that evening, which in turn increased the peak hour generations. Varied trip generations for the day of the special activity was anticipated because of possible multi trip needs and less carpooling of parents and students of Wasatch Elementary. Counts of walking and biking students were not taken from the back of the building. Walking traffic was usually limited to the back of the building. The maximum generation within any hour of counting toward the front of the building was 15. Most of these were generated by college students volunteering at the school walking to and from the elementary school. There were days that no pedestrians came at all during survey times. There was no consistency in the number of pedestrian generations to the front of the elementary school. 0.69 0.14 0.72 0.39 0.27