Comparative Trophic Ecology of Yellowfin and Bigeye Tuna Associated with Natural and Man-made Aggregation Sites in Hawaiian Waters

Similar documents
Comparative trophic ecology of yellowfin and bigeye tuna associated with natural and man-made aggregation sites in Hawaiian waters

Trophic Ecology of Four Apex Predators of the Pelagic Ecosystem in the Indian Ocean

Effect of seamounts on mesopelagic micronekton community structure around Hawaii. Lisa De Forest, Jeffrey Drazen, and Réka Domokos

TUNA trophic structure in the Pacific Ocean. PFRP funded project

Qualitative analysis of food webs in the Pacific Ocean

application of the dumb tag technology

Analysis on stomach content of bigeye tuna ( Thunnus obesus) in the eastern-central Pacific Ocean

Diet of mahi-mahi, wahoo and lancetfish in the western and central Pacific. Valérie ALLAIN

JIMAR, PFRP ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT FOR FY PROJECT #

Tagging tuna in the Central Pacific:

Contribution of cephalopod prey to large pelagic fish diet in the central N. Atlantic

TROPHIC RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN PREDATORS CAUGHT BY TUNA PURSE-SEINERS SEINERS IN THE EASTERN PACIFIC OCEAN

Isotope Biogeography and Trophic Dynamics of Billfish Collected in the Equatorial Pacific Ocean.

TUNA DIET IN THE EQUATORIAL PACIFIC OCEAN EAST TO WEST

SMALL BOAT TUNA LONGLINE FISHERY NORTH-WEST COAST OF SRI LANKA R. Maldeniya

SAC-08-10a Staff activities and research plans. 8 a Reunión del Comité Científico Asesor 8 th Meeting of the Scientific Advisory Committee

JIMAR PFRP ANNUAL REPORT FOR FY To protect, restore, and manage the use of coastal and ocean resources through ecosystem-base management

Tropical Scombrid Feeding Habits in the Central Pacific Kevin McLean S-199 June 9, 2005

Albacore tuna, Bigeye tuna, Blackfin tuna, Skipjack tuna, Yellowfin tuna. Image Monterey Bay Aquarium. Atlantic. Purse Seine.

Papua New Guinea/SPC Tuna Tagging Project: PRFP linking to the bigger picture

Biological Sampling Newslet for Observers and Port Samplers

Yellowfin Tuna, Indian Ocean, Troll/ pole and line

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE THIRD REGULAR SESSION August 2007 Honolulu, United States of America

SCTB16 Working Paper FTWG 5

Some Biological Parameters of Bigeye and Yellowfin Tunas Distributed in Surrounding Waters of Taiwan

WORKING GROUP ON STOCK ASSESSMENTS 5 TH MEETING DOCUMENT SAR-5-05 BET A

and found that there exist a significant overlap between the billfish resources and the exploitation activities targeting tunas and mahi mahi.

Albacore Tuna, Bigeye Tuna, Skipjack Tuna, Swordfish, Yellowfin Tuna. Image Monterey Bay Aquarium. Hawaii Longline

Feeding habits of mesopelagic fishes off the coast of western Kyushu, Japan

David Wells 1, Jay Rooker 1, David Itano 2

Composition, Abundance and Distribution of Fish Larvae in the Bay of Bengal

JIMAR PFRP ANNUAL REPORT FOR FY 2007

Teleosts II: Acanthomorpha: spiny teleosts

ZOOPLANKTON. Zooplankton: 2. Crustaceans Copepods. Diverse -- protozoans and others

Tuna [211] 86587_p211_220.indd 86587_p211_220.indd /30/04 12/30/04 4:53:37 4:53:37 PM PM

Fishery-induced changes in the subtropical Pacific pelagic ecosystem size structure: Observations and theory

CATCH AND EFFORT BY KOREAN FLAGGED FLEET

Ecosystem Models: Food webs

INTER-AMERICAN TROPICAL TUNA COMMISSION SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY COMMITTEE FIFTH MEETING. La Jolla, California (USA) May 2014 DOCUMENT SAC-05-12

The vertical and horizontal distribution of bigeye tuna (Thunnus( albacares) ) related to ocean structure

Is Lagonoy Gulf a special breeding ground for Yellowfin Tuna?

Commercial Yellowfin Tuna Fishing in the Gulf of Mexico States

Impact of Industrial Tuna Fisheries on Fish Stocks and the Ecosystem of the Pacific Ocean

JIMAR PFRP ANNUAL REPORT FOR FY 2006

Spatial/Seasonal overlap between the midwater trawl herring fishery and predator focused user groups

Biological Sampling and Foraging Ecology of North Pacific Albacore

Specific gravity measurements on mackerel eggs and larvae and implications for interannual variability in recruitment

Status of the Lake Erie Fish Community Jeff Tyson, Ohio Division of Wildlife

Research Priorities of the SPC Oceanic Fisheries Programme. John Hampton Oceanic Fisheries Programme Secretariat of the Pacific Community

INTRODUCTION. Key words: diet, feeding ecology, tuna, western Indian Ocean, vertical habitat

Tuna and tuna forage: reconciling modeling and observation in a spatial mixed-resolution ecosystem model

Biological Sampling Newsletter

Monitoring the pelagic ecosystem effects of different levels of fishing effort on the western Pacific Ocean warm pool

The Biology of FAD-Associated Tuna: Temporal Dynamics of Association and Feeding Ecology

EU initiatives on FAD research

WORKING GROUP ON STOCK ASSESSMENTS 5 TH MEETING DOCUMENT SAR-5-08 TARGET SIZE FOR THE TUNA FLEET IN THE EASTERN PACIFIC OCEAN

Preliminary analysis of yellowfin tuna catch, effort, size and tagging data using an integrated age-structured model

A PRELIMINARY FOOD WEB OF THE PELAGIC ENVIRONMENT OF THE SARGASSO SEA WITH A FOCUS ON THE FISH SPECIES OF INTEREST TO ICCAT. Brian E.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE UPDATE ON LANDINGS OF TUNA, SWORDFISH AND OTHER PELAGICS

Distribution and abundance of demersal fish and invertebrate fauna around the

YELLOWFIN TUNA (Thunnus albacares)

92 ND MEETING DOCUMENT IATTC-92 INF-C

THE DIVERSITY OF FISHES

Tuna Longline Fishery in the Indian Ocean by Thai Fleet during

Ecology of Manta Rays

Marine Mammals. James M. Price. Division of Environmental Sciences. from NOAA photograph library

NFR-22. National Report: Update on tuna fisheries of Taiwan in the Pacific Region. SCTB15 Working Paper

8 TH MEETING DOCUMENT BYC-08 INF-A

Summary of Preliminary Results of Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis, 2018

Sheepshead Fishery Overview South Atlantic State/Federal Management Board May 2014 Introduction Life History Landings

Ecological interactions between forage fish, rorquals, and fisheries in Haida Gwaii

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE UPDATE ON LANDINGS OF TUNA, SWORDFISH AND OTHER PELAGICS

STATISTICS OF THE FRENCH PURSE SEINE FISHING FLEET TARGETING TROPICAL TUNAS IN THE INDIAN OCEAN ( )

WCPFC SC1 ST WP 4. Tim Lawson and Peter Williams. Oceanic Fisheries Programme Secretariat of the Pacific Community Noumea, New Caledonia

Recent advances, ongoing challenges, and future directions in ecosystem approaches to fisheries management in the central North Pacific

Results from PSAT attachments to swordfish a cautionary tale

Pelagic Predators Food Habits Project

BIGEYE TUNA (THUNNUS OBESUS) IN THE MALDIVES R. Charles Anderson

Iran small-scale tuna longline fishery targeting yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) in Oman Sea: A preliminary study

Catch of Experimental Longline, Purse Seine and Handline in the South China Sea, Area III: Western Philippines

Takayuki Matsumoto 1, Keisuke Satoh 1, Yasuko Semba 1, Tatsuki Oshima 2 and Mikio Toyonaga 2

Critical The status of the southern bluefin tuna (SBT) stock is at a critical stage resulting in a reduction in the global SBT catch in 2010/2011.

Commercial Bycatch Rates of Shortfin Mako (Isurus oxyrinchus) from Longline Fisheries in the Canadian Atlantic

INTER-AMERICAN TROPICAL TUNA COMMISSION SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOURTH MEETING. La Jolla, California (USA) 29 April - 3 May 2013

Is fishing really worth more than

Shark Catches by the Hawaii-based Longline Fishery. William A. Walsh. Keith A. Bigelow

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE THIRD REGULAR SESSION August 2007 Honolulu, United States of America

PROPOSAL IATTC-92 B-4 REVISED SUBMITTED BY BELIZE, GUATEMALA, NICARAGUA, COSTA RICA AND PANAMA

DOCUMENT SAC-08 INF A(a) 2016 ANNUAL SCIENTIFIC OBSERVER REPORT FOR KOREAN TUNA LONGLINE FISHIERY IN THE IATTC CONVENTION AREA

Temperature Main thermocline is present in the mesopelagic Relatively constant at the ocean depths, below 1000m About 35 F = 2 C

Progress Made by Tuna Regional Fisheries Management Organizations (RFMOs)

Research Institute for Marine Fisheries, Jakarta Indonesia ABSTRACT

The Economics of Atlantic Highly Migratory Species For-Hire Fishing Trips July - November 2013 Clifford Hutt and George Silva

Conversion Factors Estimated for Bigeye and Yellowfin Tunas Distributed in Surrounding Waters of Taiwan

EEB 122b PRACTICE SECOND MIDTERM

Protect Our Reefs Grant Interim Report (October 1, 2008 March 31, 2009) Principal investigators: Donald C. Behringer and Mark J.

WORKING PAPER SKJ 1 IMPACT OF ENSO ON SURFACE TUNA HABITAT IN THE WESTERN AND CENTRAL PACIFIC OCEAN. Patrick Lehodey

Comparison of Fish Waste in Pelagic Longline Fisheries (and more)

Southern bluefin tuna >6.4kg Bigeye tuna >3.2kg Yellowfin tuna >3.2kg Swordfish >119cm LJFL / >18kg dressed Marlins >210cm LJFL

Name: Morgan Kammerer Topic: Unsustainable Fishing Methods

Transcription:

PFRP Pelagic Fisheries Research Program Comparative Trophic Ecology of Yellowfin and Bigeye Tuna Associated with Natural and Man-made Aggregation Sites in Hawaiian Waters T. obesus T. albacares Dean Grubbs and Kim Holland Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology Pelagic Fisheries Research Program University of Hawaii

What we know! The formation of aggregations, groups of fishes attracted to a common resource (Freeman and Grossman 1992), is prevalent among tropical tunas. These aggregations are usually associated with physical entities (seamounts, floating debris, cetaceans, vessels, buoys, FADs). The majority of tropical tunas harvested commercially and recreationally are associated. What we don t! Underlying biological significance of aggregation behavior is poorly understood.

Pros and cons of association: Pros: 1) Forage 2) ॐ Predation 3) Reproductive Success Cons: 1) Competition interspsecific and intraspecific 2) Susceptibility to modern fishing gear.

Distributions of bigeye and yellowfin are vertically distinct. BUT, this pattern is known to collapse when associated.

OBJECTIVES: Compare feeding ecology of yellowfin and bigeye tuna within and between various mixed aggregations (using unassociated samples as controls). a) Stomach Fullness b) Feeding Strategy c) Prey Composition d) Depth of Feeding e) Timing of Feeding Evaluate potential trophic benefit of aggregating. Evaluate the effect of man-made aggregating structures on trophic biology.

(depth 47m)

UNASSOCIATED SAMPLES (LONGLINE)

METHODS: 1) Port Sampling a) Samples obtained directly from returning vessels b) Samples obtained from seafood buyers at UFA 2) Field Sampling a) Sampling at sea on commercial troll/handline vessels. b) Sampling at sea aboard project vessels.

Association Bigeye Yellowfin Unassociated 47 37 Cross Seamount 389 116 Offshore Weather Buoys 177 87 Nearshore FADs 11 93 Dolphin Pods 2 TOTAL Total Analyzed 624 56 (9%) 335 228 (68%)

Results Prey Composition

Depth 2 meters BE YF Epipelagic Zone Mesopelagic Zone 1 meters Bathypelagic Zone 4 meters Abyssopelagic Zone Abyssal Plain Hadal Zone

Prey Diversity (Fishes) PHYLUM: CHORDATA SUPERORDER SCOPELOMORPHA ORDER DACTYLOPTERIFORMES SUBPHYLUM: VERTEBRATA (CRANIATA) ORDER MYCTOPHIFORMES 33 FAMILY DACTYLOPTERIDAE CLASS: TELEOSTOMI (OSTEICHTHYES) 17 FAMILY MYCTOPHIDAE ORDER SCORPAENIFORMES SUBCLASS: ACTINOPTERYGII SUPERORDER LAMPRIDIOMORPHA 34 FAMILY SCORPAENIDAE INFRACLASS: NEOPTERYGII ORDER LAMPRIDIFORMES ORDER PERCIFORMES DIVISION: TELEOSTEI 18 FAMILY LOPHOTIDAE 35 FAMILY PERCICHTYIDAE SUBDIVISION: ELOPOMORPHA 19 FAMILY TRACHIPTERIDAE 36 FAMILY PRIACANTHIDAE ORDER ANGUILLIFORMES SUPERORDER PARACANTHOPTERYGII 37 FAMILY ECHENEIDAE 1 FAMILY OPHICHTHYIDAE ORDER OPHIDIIFORMES 38 FAMILY CARANGIDAE 2 FAMILY SERRIOVOMERIDAE 2 FAMILY OPHIDIIDAE 39 FAMILY BRAMIDAE SUBDIVISION: EUTELEOSTII ORDER GADIFORMES 4 FAMILY CHAETODONTIDAE SUPERORDER STENOPTERYGII 21 FAMILY BREGMACEROTIDAE 41 FAMILY POMACENTRIDAE ORDER STOMIIFORMES ORDER LOPHIIFORMES 42 FAMILY CIRRHITIDAE 3 FAMILY STOMIIDAE 22 FAMILY OGCOCEPHALIDAE 43 FAMILY CHIASMODONTIDAE 4 FAMILY MELANOSTOMIIDAE SUPERORDER ACANTHOPTERYGII 44 FAMILY BLENNIIDAE 5 FAMILY CHAULIODONTIDAE ORDER BELONIFORMES 45 FAMILY ACANTHURIDAE 6 FAMILY IDIACANTHIDAE 23 FAMILY EXOCOETIDAE 46 FAMILY SCOMBROLABRACIDAE 7 FAMILY ASTRONESTHIDAE 24 FAMILY HEMIRAMPHIDAE 47 FAMILY MALACANTHIDAE 8 FAMILY GONOSTOMATIDAE ORDER GASTEROSTEIFORMES 48 FAMILY TRICHIURIDAE 9 FAMILY PHOTICHTHYIDAE 25 FAMILY FISTULARIIDAE 49 FAMILY GEMPYLIDAE 1 FAMILY STERNOPTYCHIDAE 26 FAMILY SYNGNATHIDAE 5 FAMILY SCOMBRIDAE SUPERORDER CYCLOSQUAMATA SERIES PERCOMORPHA 51 FAMILY ISTIOPHORIDAE ORDER AULOPIFORMES ORDER STEPHANOBERYCIFORMES 52 FAMILY NOMEIDAE 11 FAMILY PARALAPEDIDAE 27 FAMILY MELAMPHEIDAE 53 FAMILY ARRIOMATIDAE 12 FAMILY SCOPELARCHIDAE ORDER BERYCIFORMES 54 FAMILY LUTJANIDAE 13 FAMILY EVERMANNELLIDAE 28 FAMILY ANOPLOGASTRIDAE 55 FAMILY TETRAGONURIDAE 14 FAMILY OMOSUDIDAE 29 FAMILY BERYCIDAE ORDER TETRAODONTIFORMES 15 FAMILY ALEPISAURIDAE 3 FAMILY DIRETMIDAE 56 FAMILY BALISTIDAE 16 FAMILY NOTOSUDIDAE 31 FAMILY HOLOCENTRIDAE 57 FAMILY MONOCANTHIDAE 32 FAMILY TRACHICHTHYIDAE 58 FAMILY TETRAODONTIDAE 59 FAMILY OSTRACIIDAE 6 FAMILY MOLIDAE

Authors Area Species (N) Fish Families Reintjes & King 1953 Central Pacific Yellowfin (167) 38 Ronquillo 1953 Western Pacific Yellowfin 36 King & Ikehara 1956 Central Pacific Yellowfin (439) 48 Watanabe 1958 Indian Ocean Yellowfin 37 Alverson 1963 Eastern Pacific Yellowfin (3763) 42 Kornilova 1981 Indian Ocean Yellowfin (445) 23 Borodulina 1982 Gulf of Guinea Yellowfin (67) 2 Borodulina 1982 Western Pacific Yellowfin (31) 3 Brock 1985 Hawaii Yellowfin (21) 27 Maldeniya 1996 Sri Lanka Yellowfin (4181) 44 Kim et al. 1997 Western Pacific Yellowfin (181) 13 Current Study Hawaii Yellowfin (228) 34 King & Ikehara 1956 Central Pacific Bigeye (166) 35 Borodulina 1974 Gulf of Guinea Bigeye (143) 23 Kornilova 1981 Indian Ocean Bigeye (534) 19 Kim et al. 1997 Western Pacific Bigeye (17) 13 Current Study Hawaii Bigeye (56) 52

Prey Diversity Comparisons Shannon's Reciprocal 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Prey Diversity (Shannon's Reciprocal Index) Bigeye Yellowfin Unassociated Seamount Weather Buoy

Results Stomach Fullness

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Mean Stomach Fullness Bigeye Yellowfin Seamount Offshore Buoy Unassociated

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Mean Stomach Fullness Bigeye Yellowfin Seamount Offshore Buoy Unassociated ANOVA: F=.453, =.363 Yellowfin

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Mean Stomach Fullness Bigeye Yellowfin Seamount Offshore Buoy Unassociated ANOVA: F=4.272, <.1 Bigeye

Dietary Overlap Morisita s Index % Overlap (sign. at.6) (sign. at 6%) Bigeye.27 25% Unassociated vs. Seamount Bigeye.27 26% Unassociated vs. Buoy Bigeye.19 18% Seamount vs. Buoy Yellowfin.12 14% Unassociated vs. Seamount Yellowfin.22 27% Unassociated vs. Buoy Yellowfin.22 25% Seamount vs. Buoy

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Mean Stomach Fullness Bigeye Yellowfin Seamount Offshore Buoy Unassociated t-test: t=.39, =.7

Unassociated Tuna: Frequency of Occurrence of Prey Fish Families 1 Major Families of Prey Fishes % of samples 8 6 4 2 mesopelagics Bigeye Yellowfin epipelagics Paralapedidae Myctophidae Omosudidae Chiasmodontidae Scopelarchidae Scorpaenidae Gempylidae Anoplogasteridae Astronesthidae Sternoptychidae Alepisauridae Molidae Thunnidae Ostraciidae Engraulidae

Unassociated Tuna: Frequency of Occurrence of Invertebrate Prey 1 Major Taxa of Invertebrate Prey % of samples 8 6 4 2 mesopelagics epipelagics Bigeye Yellowfin Cephalopoda Peneidae Euphausiacea Sergestidae Oplophoridae Megalopae Stomatopoda Amphipoda Thaliacea

Feeding Strategies (Costello 199) Percent Abundance 1 8 6 4 2 Rare Prey Specialized Feeding Strategy 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 Frequency of Occurence Dominant Prey Percent Abundance 1 8 6 4 2 Generalized Feeding Strategy Wide Diet Breadth 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 Frequency of Occurence

Unassociated Percent Abundance 1 8 6 4 2 Bigeye Tuna Feeding Strategy Molidae Cephalopoda Peneidae 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 Frequency of Occurence Percent Abundance 1 8 6 4 2 Yellowfin Tuna Feeding Strategy Thaliacea Cephalopoda Engraulidae Amphipoda 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 Frequency of Occurence

Unassociated 1 Bigeye Tuna Feeding Strategy Percent Volume 8 6 4 2 Molidae Mesopelagic Aggregate 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 Frequency of Occurence Cephalopoda 1 Yellowfin Tuna Feeding Strategy Percent Volume 8 6 4 2 Scombridae Engraulidae Thaliacea Cephalopoda 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 Frequency of Occurence

Dietary Overlap Morisita s Index % Overlap (sign. at.6) (sign. at 6%) Bigeye vs. Yellowfin.42 27% Unassociated

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Mean Stomach Fullness Bigeye Yellowfin Seamount Offshore Buoy Unassociated t-test: t=3.5, =.31 NOAA Weather Buoy

Weather Buoy Tuna: Frequency of Occurrence of Prey Fish Families 1 Major Families of Prey Fishes % of samples 8 6 4 2 mesopelagics epipelagics Bigeye Yellowfin Bramidae Lophotidae Gempylidae Thunnidae Ostraciidae Tetraondontidae Balistidae Dactylopteridae Molidae Exocoetidae Chaetodontidae Syngnathidae Alepisauridae

Weather Buoy Tuna: Frequency of Occurrence of Invertebrate Prey 1 Major Taxa of Invertebrate Prey % of samples 8 6 4 2 mesopelagics epipelagics Bigeye Yellowfin Cephalopoda Gymnosomata Phyllosomes Euphausiacea Heterocarpus Sergestidae Enoplemetophidae Isopoda Amphipoda Thaliacea Stomatopoda Megalopae

Offshore Weather Buoy Associated 1 Bigeye Tuna Feeding Strategy Percent Abundance 8 6 4 2 Cephalopoda Megalopae 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 Frequency of Occurence 1 Yellowfin Tuna Feeding Strategy Percent Abundance 8 6 4 2 Megalopae Cephalopoda Stomatopoda 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 Frequency of Occurence

Offshore Weather Buoy Associated 1 Bigeye Tuna Feeding Strategy Percent Volume 8 6 4 2 Bramidae Lophotidaedae Cephalopoda 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 Frequency of Occurence 1 Yellowfin Tuna Feeding Strategy Percent Volume 8 6 4 2 Molidae Scombridae 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 Frequency of Occurence

Dietary Overlap Morisita s Index % Overlap (sign. at.6) (sign. at 6%) Bigeye vs. Yellowfin.42 27% Unassociated Bigeye vs. Yellowfin.4 32% Buoy Associated

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Mean Stomach Fullness Bigeye Yellowfin Seamount Offshore Buoy Unassociated t-test: t=6.64, <.1 Cross Seamount

Depth 2 meters BE YF Epipelagic Zone Mesopelagic Zone 1 meters Bathypelagic Zone 4 meters Abyssopelagic Zone Abyssal Plain Hadal Zone

Depth 2 meters BE YF Epipelagic Zone Mesopelagic Zone 1 meters Cross Seamount 33m Bathypelagic Zone 4 meters Abyssopelagic Zone Abyssal Plain Hadal Zone

Holland, Kleiber, and Kajiura 1998 Estimated residence times of bigeye and yellowfin tuna at Cross Seamount Bigeye: 32 days Yellowfin: 15 days DIFFERENCE NOW MAKES SENSE! Also supports the increased forage theory as explanation of aggregation.

Depth of Feeding 72 samples collected from Cross Seamount September 21 Of 14 yellowfin, 4 captured >12m deep Of 58 bigeye, 43 captured >12m deep, 28 captured 3m or greater (along with Ruvettus and Eumegistus illustris)

Mean Stomach Fullness with Depth Cross Seamount - September 21 7. 6. Bigeye Yellowfin 5. 4. 3. 2. 1.. N=15 N=1 N=15 N=4 N=28 N= 1-28 3-36 Depth (meters)

Cross Seamount Tuna: Frequency of Occurrence of Prey Fish Families 1 Major Families of Prey Fish % of samples 8 6 4 2 mesopelagics Bigeye epipelagics Yellowfin Myctophidae Percichthyidae Chiasmodontidae Gonostomatidae Gempylidae Scopelarchidae Scombrolabracidae Paralapedidae Tetragonuridae Ostraciidae Exocoetidae Balistidae Chaetodontidae Acanthuridae Bramidae

Cross Seamount Tuna: Frequency of Occurrence of Invertebrate Prey 1 Major Taxa of Invertebrate Prey % of samples 8 6 4 2 mesopelagics epipelagics Bigeye Yellowfin Cephalopoda Sergestidae Oplophoridae Penaeidae Pandalidae Isopoda Enoplemetophidae Euphausiacea Amphipoda Stomatopoda Megalopae

Cross Seamount Associated Percent Abundance 1 8 6 4 2 Bigeye Tuna Feeding Strategy Oplophoridae Myctophidae Sergestidae Cephalopoda 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 Frequency of Occurence Percent Abundance 1 8 6 4 2 Yellowfin Tuna Feeding Strategy Sergestidae Megalopae Cephalopoda 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 Frequency of Occurence

Cross Seamount Associated Percent Volume 1 8 6 4 2 Bigeye Tuna Feeding Strategy Oplophoridae Myctophidae Sergestidae Cephalopoda 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 Frequency of Occurence Percent Volume 1 8 6 4 2 Yellowfin Tuna Feeding Strategy Myctophidae Sergestidae Oplophoridae Cephalopoda 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 Frequency of Occurence

Dietary Overlap Morisita s Index % Overlap (sign. at.6) (sign. at 6%) Bigeye vs. Yellowfin.42 27% Unassociated Bigeye vs. Yellowfin.4 32% Buoy Associated Bigeye vs. Yellowfin.66 57% Seamount

Cross Seamount: Percent Abundance of Invertebrate Prey Percent of Total 6 4 2 Shrimp Prey Families Oplophoridae and Sergestdae Bigeye Yellowfin Systelaspis O. gracilirostris O. spinacauda Acanthephyra Sergia young Sergia adult Sergestes young Sergestes adult Depth (meters) 2 4 6 8 1

Dietary Overlap Morisita s Index % Overlap (sign. at.6) (sign. at 6%) Bigeye vs. Yellowfin.42 27% Unassociated Bigeye vs. Yellowfin.4 32% Buoy Associated Bigeye vs. Yellowfin.66 57% Seamount Bigeye vs. Yellowfin.56 52% Seamount (cephalopods. oplophorids, and sergestids separated)

Timing of Feeding? Need more data! however... Cross Seamount: Percent Abundance of Invertebrate Prey Percent of Total 6 4 2 Shrimp Prey Families Oplophoridae and Sergestdae Bigeye Yellowfin Systelaspis O. gracilirostris O. spinacauda Acanthephyra Sergia young Sergia adult Sergestes young Sergestes adult Depth (meters) 2 4 6 8 1

PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS Typical Seamount Prey Typical Offshore Buoy Prey

PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS 1) Bigeye and Yellowfin are euryphagous predators with generalized feeding strategies when associated with the Cross Seamount. The forage base for both species is extremely diverse, though few taxa are numerically or volumetrically important in the diet. 2) Differences in vertical distribution are reflected in prey composition and may minimize competition between tuna species. Yellowfin tuna fed primarily on mixed-layer prey while bigeye tuna fed on deep scatteringlayer prey 3) Association with the Cross Seamount imparts a larger trophic advantage to bigeye than yellowfin due to high abundance of mesopelagic prey. This explains why published residence times on the seamount are longer for bigeye than yellowfin. 4) Associating with offshore weather buoys is of no trophic advantage to either species may be metabolically costly for bigeye tuna. If this cost is detrimental,detailed evaluations of the ecological impact of man-made structures, such as FADs, in tropical waters might be warranted.

FUTURE PLANS Complete lab analysis of collected samples. Increase samples from unassociated tuna (longline vessels) and nearshore FADs (recreational vessels) Continue sampling to increase number of yellowfin samples, investigate timing of feeding, get samples from various capture depths. Stable Isotopes: Brittany Graham and Brian Popp Investigate seasonal and ontogenetic changes in trophic ecology.

1 Hypothetical shift in Dietary Overlap Bigeye versus Yellowfin.8 Index of Overlap.6.4.2 <5 51-75 76-1 >1 Tuna Fork Length

1 Hypothetical shift in Dietary Overlap Bigeye versus Yellowfin.8? Index of Overlap.6.4.2 <5 51-75 76-1 >1 Tuna Fork Length

Feeding Strategies Specialized Predator Dominant Prey

Copyright R. Dean Grubbs 1998 PAU

15 12 Seamount-associated Tuna Length Frequencies Bigeye Yellowfin Frequency 9 6 3 <5 51-6 61-7 71-8 81-9 91-1 11-11 >11 Fork Length (cm) 8 Offshore Buoy-associated Tuna Length Frequencies Frequency 6 4 2 Bigeye Yellowfin <5 51-6 61-7 71-8 81-9 91-1 11-11 >11 Fork Length (cm)