Results and conclusions of a floating Lidar offshore test

Similar documents
Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 53 (2014 )

WIND ENERGY REPORT GERMANY 2013

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 53 (2014 )

Carbon Trust Offshore Wind Accelerator. OWA floating LiDAR campaign: Babcock trial at Gwynt Y Môr Copenhagen, 11 March 2015 Megan Smith

Executive Summary of Accuracy for WINDCUBE 200S

DIRECTION DEPENDENCY OF OFFSHORE TURBULENCE INTENSITY IN THE GERMAN BIGHT

The NORCOWE legacy - data and instrumentation

On- and Offshore Assessment of the ZephIR Wind-LiDAR

10 years of meteorological measurements at FINO1

NORCOWE met-ocean measurement campaigns

Wind Data Verification Report Arriga 50m

FINO1 Mast Correction

Evaluation of wind flow with a nacelle-mounted, continuous wave wind lidar

2. Fachtagung Energiemeteorologie 2011, Bremerhaven SITE ASSESSMENT. WIND TURBINE ASSESSMENT. GRID INTEGRATION. DUE DILIGENCE. KNOWLEDGE.

Increased Project Bankability : Thailand's First Ground-Based LiDAR Wind Measurement Campaign

VALIDATION OF WIND SPEED DISTURBANCES TO CUPS AT THE METEORLOCICAL MAST ON THE OFFSHORE PLATFORM FINO1 USING WIND-LIDAR MEASUREMENTS.

Coherence of turbulent wind at FINO1

Offshore Micrositing - Meeting The Challenge

REMOTE SENSING APPLICATION in WIND ENERGY

A Wind Profiling Platform for Offshore Wind Measurements and Assessment. Presenter: Mark Blaseckie AXYS Technologies Inc.

Meteorological Measurements OWEZ

CORRELATION EFFECTS IN THE FIELD CLASSIFICATION OF GROUND BASED REMOTE WIND SENSORS

Meteorological Measurements OWEZ

LONG TERM SITE WIND DATA QUARTERLY REPORT. Bishop and Clerks

Windcube FCR measurements

Remote sensing standards: their current status and significance for offshore projects

LONG TERM SITE WIND DATA QUARTERLY REPORT. Bishop and Clerks

Lake Michigan Wind Assessment Project Data Summary and Analysis: October 2012

3D Nacelle Mounted Lidar in Complex Terrain

FUGRO/OCEANOR SEAWATCH WIND LIDAR BUOY ASSESSMENT OF THE FUGRO/OCEANOR SEAWATCH FLOATING LIDAR VERIFICATION AT RWE IJMUIDEN MET MAST

Investigating Wind Flow properties in Complex Terrain using 3 Lidars and a Meteorological Mast. Dimitri Foussekis

TESTING AND CALIBRATION OF VARIOUS LiDAR REMOTE SENSING DEVICES FOR A 2 YEAR OFFSHORE WIND MEASUREMENT CAMPAIGN

EMPOWERING OFFSHORE WINDFARMS BY RELIABLE MEASUREMENTS

Strategic Advice about Floating LiDAR Campaigns. Borssele offshore wind farm

can the wind industry bank on wind lidar? November 2014

Validation of Measurements from a ZephIR Lidar

Power curves - use of spinner anemometry. Troels Friis Pedersen DTU Wind Energy Professor

WIND DATA REPORT. Paxton, MA

Wind Resource Assessment for FALSE PASS, ALASKA Site # 2399 Date last modified: 7/20/2005 Prepared by: Mia Devine

Torrild - WindSIM Case study

OFFSHORE CREDENTIALS. Accepted for wind resource assessment onshore and offshore by leading Banks Engineers, globally

LONG TERM SITE WIND DATA ANNUAL REPORT. Mass Turnpike Authority Blandford, MA

A Study of the Normal Turbulence Model in IEC

Predicting climate conditions for turbine performance

Wind measurements that reduce electricity prices

Control Strategies for operation of pitch regulated turbines above cut-out wind speeds

7 th International Conference on Wind Turbine Noise Rotterdam 2 nd to 5 th May 2017

Measuring offshore winds from onshore one lidar or two?

LONG TERM SITE WIND DATA ANNUAL REPORT. Paxton, MA

FIVE YEARS OF OPERATION OF THE FIRST OFFSHORE WIND RESEARCH PLATFORM IN THE GERMAN BIGHT FINO1

Shorter wind measurement campaigns Re-thinking with LiDAR

Scanning lidar measurements of offshore wind turbine wakes. Peter Clive Senior Scientist, SgurrEnergy All Energy, Glasgow

Offshore Metocean Station for Energy Purposes

3D Turbulence at the Offshore Wind Farm Egmond aan Zee J.W. Wagenaar P.J. Eecen

COMPARASION OF WIND MEASUREMENTS BY LIDAR AND MEASUREMENT MAST FOR BORA WIND IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA. Elvir Zlomušica, Suad Zalihić, Jasmin Bejdić

LONG TERM SITE WIND DATA ANNUAL REPORT. Bishop & Clerks

WIND DATA REPORT. Bishop and Clerks

MULTI-WTG PERFORMANCE OFFSHORE, USING A SINGLE SCANNING DOPPLER LIDAR

Report on the Research Project OWID Offshore Wind Design Parameter

Analysis and Verification of Wind Data from Ground-based LiDAR

WIND DATA REPORT. Paxton, MA

The OWEZ Meteorological Mast

Full Classification acc. to IEC for SoDAR AQ510 Wind Finder. Vincent Camier, Managing Director, Ammonit Measurement GmbH

WIND INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS

Hollandse Kust (zuid) Wind resource assessment. 17 January 2017 Anthony Crockford

COMPARISON OF ZEPHIR MEASUREMENTS AGAINST CUP ANEMOMETRY AND POWER CURVE ASSESSMENT

FRØYA SEAWATCH WIND LIDAR BUOY PRE-DEPLOYMENT VALIDATION

Wind Project Siting & Resource Assessment

LIDAR Correlation to Extreme Flapwise Moment : Gust Impact Prediction Time and Feedforward Control

7 YEARS METEOMAST AMRUMBANK WEST

Improvement of Wind Farm Performance by Means of Spinner Anemometry

The Offshore Boundary Layer Observatory (OBLO) Possibilities for the offshore wind industry

PROJECT CYCLOPS: THE WAY FORWARD IN POWER CURVE MEASUREMENTS?

Low level coastal jet

National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Wind Resource Data Summary Guam Naval Ordnance Annex Data Summary and Retrieval for November 2009

LONG TERM SITE WIND DATA QUARTERLY REPORT. Bishop and Clerks

Windar Photonics Wind Sensor. Great at Control

July Interim Report. National Institute of Wind Energy (NIWE) Wind Resource Assessment & Offshore Unit Chennai, India.

Nanortalik A preliminary analysis of the wind measurements rev 1

Yawing and performance of an offshore wind farm

WIND DATA REPORT. Mass Turnpike Authority Blandford, MA

EERA DTOC wake results offshore

WCA Wind Research Project Report

Validation of long-range scanning lidars deployed around the Høvsøre Test Station

MOTUS Wave Buoys. Powered By the Aanderaa MOTUS Directional Wave Sensor

Nacelle lidar for power curve measurement _ Avedøre campaign. DTU Vindenergi. Report Rozenn Wagner, Samuel Davoust. DTU Wind Energy E-0016

Computationally Efficient Determination of Long Term Extreme Out-of-Plane Loads for Offshore Turbines

Wind farm performance

1.1 The Facilitator began the 7th meeting by reviewing the SLG Team s actions from the 6th SLG meeting on 1 st February 2013.

Atqasuk Wind Resource Report

Comparison of flow models

ERS WAVE MISSION REPROCESSING- QC SUPPORT ENVISAT MISSION EXTENSION SUPPORT

Analysis of vertical wind direction and speed gradients for data from the met. mast at Høvsøre

Wind Resource Assessment Østerild National Test Centre for Large Wind Turbines

Yawing and performance of an offshore wind farm

Wind Regimes 1. 1 Wind Regimes

Flow analysis with nacellemounted

KISSsoft 03/2016 Tutorial 9

Wind Resource Assessment for NOME (ANVIL MOUNTAIN), ALASKA Date last modified: 5/22/06 Compiled by: Cliff Dolchok

PERFORMANCE STABILITY OF ZEPHIR IN HIGH MOTION ENVIRONMENTS: FLOATING AND TURBINE MOUNTED

Transcription:

Results and conclusions of a floating Lidar offshore test J. Gottschall, G. Wolken-Möhlmann, Th. Viergutz, B. Lange [Fraunhofer IWES Wind Lidar Buoy next to FINO1 met. mast] EERA DeepWind'2014 Conference, 22-24 January 2014, Trondheim, Norway

Overview o Introduction Floating Lidar o Fraunhofer IWES Wind Lidar Buoy o Offshore test next to FINO1 met. mast Setup Results Conclusions o Summary

Overview o Introduction Floating Lidar o Fraunhofer IWES Wind Lidar Buoy o Offshore test next to FINO1 met. mast Setup Results Conclusions o Summary

Introduction Floating Lidar Floating-lidar system offer a great potential to assess offshore wind resources, and are a cost-effective and flexible alternative to offshore meteorological (met.) masts. Development of suitable (for an application in the offshore wind industry optimized) systems has made considerable progress during the last few years Realisations vary in adapted lidar technology, buoy concepts, data handling, power supply, as well as in the consideration of motion effects on the recorded data. [Selected floating-lidar systems system manufactureres / providers]

Overview o Introduction Floating Lidar o Fraunhofer IWES Wind Lidar Buoy o Offshore test next to FINO1 met. mast Setup Results Conclusions o Summary

Fraunhofer IWES Wind Lidar Buoy Developed within the R&D project Offshore Messboje (funded by BMU, 2011-13), prototype completed in spring 2013 Floating-lidar system integrating a Windcube v2 lidar device in an adapted marine buoy ( Leuchtfeuertonne LT81) Buoy dimensions: 7.2 m height, 2.55 m diameter, 4.7 t weight Encapsulated lidar device in custom-made housing Autonomous power system based on three microwind turbines, solar panels, AGM battery banks for energy storage Motion-correction algorithm developed by Fraunhofer IWES implemented as part of postprocessing, Photograph: Caspar Sessler

Overview o Introduction Floating Lidar o Fraunhofer IWES Wind Lidar Buoy o Offshore test next to FINO1 met. mast Setup Results Conclusions o Summary

Offshore test next to FINO1 Setup, Photograph: Caspar Sessler Offshore test from 2 Aug 6 Oct 2013 in 450 m distance (NW direction) to FINO1 met. mast (German North Sea, 45 km offshore) Representative offshore conditions: 30 m water depth, yearly-averaged wind speed of 9.9 m/s at 100 m height, mean wind direction SW, sea currents governed by tides Floating-lidar system was installed together with bottom-based AWAC system for recording of sea conditions Basic procedure of testing (verification / accuracy assessment): comparison of wind data (horizontal 10-min-mean wind speed, wind direction, turbulence intensity) measured by floating-lidar device with data from reference sensors of met. mast (cup anemometers, wind vanes)

Overview o Introduction Floating Lidar o Fraunhofer IWES Wind Lidar Buoy o Offshore test next to FINO1 met. mast Setup Results Conclusions o Summary

Offshore test next to FINO1 Results [Transmitted status data (voltages of battery banks assigned to micro-wind turbines) in relation to reference wind conditions. ]

Offshore test next to FINO1 Results [Correlation between measured 10-min-mean (horizontal) wind speeds from floating-lidar device and cup anemometers at 100 m measurement height.] very good correlation for uncorrected (!) data

Offshore test next to FINO1 Results 100 m 100 m Correlation results (for measured wind speeds) are obtained for - limited wind direction sector and - top height of meteorological mast. 80 m

Offshore test next to FINO1 Results 100 m 100 m Correlation results (for measured wind speeds) are obtained for - limited wind direction sector and - top height of meteorological mast 80 m

Offshore test next to FINO1 Results 100 m Application of motion correction (for limited dataset) further improves the correlation between wind measurements from floating-lidar device and reference cup anemometer. #data m [-] C [m/s] R 2 k [-] R 2 no correction 375 1.0039 0.0538 0.9969 1.0092 0.9968 method c1 375 1.0138-0.0013 0.9970 1.0137 0.9970 method c2 375 1.0061 0.0241 0.9979 1.0085 0.9978 method c3h 375 1.0170-0.0880 0.9978 1.0083 0.9977 Applied linear models: y = mx + C y = kx

Offshore test next to FINO1 Results (a) 100 m (b) [Deviation in measured 10-min-mean wind speeds from floating lidar* and cup anemometer versus (a) reference wind speed values and (b) simultaneously recorded (30-min-mean) significant wave height] * again uncorrected

Offshore test next to FINO1 Results (b) (c) [ (c) Deviation in measured Turbulence Intensity (TI) values versus significant wave height ]

Offshore test next to FINO1 Results 100 m Application of motion correction (for limited dataset) significantly improves the correlation between TI values based on measurements from floating-lidar device and reference cup anemometer. #data m [-] C [m/s] R 2 k [-] R 2 no correction 375 (linear regression not applicable) method c1 375 (linear regression not applicable) method c2 375 0.922 0.042 0.703 1.314 0.556 method c3h 375 0.651 0.042 0.582 1.049 0.332

Offshore test next to FINO1 Results [ Deviation in measured (10-min-mean) wind directions versus current direction ]

Offshore test next to FINO1 Results [ Deviation in measured (10-min-mean) wind directions versus current direction ] 100 m Yaw correction basically solves the wind-direction confusion in the measurements of the floating-lidar device.

Overview o Introduction Floating Lidar o Fraunhofer IWES Wind Lidar Buoy o Offshore test next to FINO1 met. mast Setup Results Conclusions o Summary

Offshore test next to FINO1 Conclusions Results of floating-lidar offshore test (for Fraunhofer IWES Wind Lidar Buoy) are largely in line with the acceptance criteria for KPIs defined in Carbon Trust OWA roadmap for the commercial acceptance of floating LIDAR technology (published Nov. 2013). Further analysis (e.g. sensibility study with respect to different external parameters, investigation of motion correction on different levels) extremely helpful to assess the performance of the floating-lidar device under test in more detail and necessary to estimate the complete uncertainty budget for the final application. Further work on Recommended Practices for the use of floating-lidar systems is scheduled within IEA Task 32 WP 1.5 (our results and conclusions will be an input to this work).

Overview o Introduction Floating Lidar o Fraunhofer IWES Wind Lidar Buoy o Offshore test next to FINO1 met. mast Setup Results Conclusions o Summary

Summary Introduction of the Fraunhofer IWES Wind Lidar Buoy as a compact floatinglidar concept with an encapsulated (well-protected) lidar device, a reliable power supply strategy, and an efficient (in-house developed) motion correction algorithm. Wind speed measurements show very good correlation with reference data from FINO1 met. mast (in nine-weeks trial from August to October 2013), wind direction and Turbulence Intensity data require motion correction. System availability close to 100% (98%) definition of post-processed data availability depends on needed motion data and applied correction. Further work on the Fraunhofer IWES Wind Lidar Buoy is in progress second offshore test with a modified prototype is planned for the first half of 2014. a

Thank you for listening.* [Video?] * The work presented has been funded by the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservationd and Nuclear Safety (BMU).