Town of Duck, North Carolina

Similar documents
Town of Duck, North Carolina

Table 4. Volumetric Change Rates Pre-Project and Post-Project for the Town of Duck

Building Beaches with Navigation Sand, Just Don t Forget the Dunes!!

Dare County Nourishment Project Town of Duck

Beach Renourishment in Jacksonville

ATLANTIC COAST OF LONG ISLAND, JONES INLET TO EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, LONG BEACH ISLAND, NY. Contract #2 Construction Scope. April 18th-19th 2018

Figure79. Location map for the 10 NJBPN profile sites in Atlantic County, NJ 155

North Shore of Long Island, Feasibility Study

UPPER BEACH REPLENISHMENT PROJECT RELATED

DELAWARE S VULNERABLE COASTAL AREAS. DELAWARE INLAND BAYS and DELAWARE BAY RECONNAISSANCE STUDY

PLAQUEMINES PARISH BARRIER ISLAND RESTORATION & SUSTAINABILITY. MVD/Gulf Coast Regional Dredging Meeting November 5, 2013

HURRICANE SANDY LIMITED REEVALUATION REPORT UNION BEACH, NEW JERSEY DRAFT ENGINEERING APPENDIX SUB APPENDIX D SBEACH MODELING

Protecting our Beaches

Figure 262. Location map for the 10 NJBPN profile sites in Atlantic County, NJ 279

Atlantic Coast of Long Island, Jones Inlet to East Rockaway Inlet, Long Beach Island, NY Construction Update

APPENDIX A Coastal Engineering

FINAL REPORT FOR 2013 ON THE CONDITION OF THE MUNICIPAL OCEANFRONT BEACHES THE BOROUGH OF AVALON, CAPE MAY COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

Beach Restoration in Okaloosa and Walton Counties. FSBPA Technology Conference Clearwater, FL

Volume and Shoreline Changes along Pinellas County Beaches during Tropical Storm Debby

Figure 46. Locations of the 28 NJBPN profile stations in Ocean County, NJ. A new site was added in the Borough of Seaside Heights (#248).

Modeling Sediment Transport Along the Upper Texas Coast

New Jersey Coastal Zone Overview. The New Jersey Beach Profile Network (NJBPN) 3 Dimensional Assessments. Quantifying Shoreline Migration

ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA

RE: Hurricane Matthew Beach Damage Assessment and Recommendations [CSE 2416]

City of Del Mar Local Coastal Plan (LCP) Amendment for Sea Level Rise and Coastal Flooding

ALTERNATIVES FOR COASTAL STORM DAMAGE MITIGATION

New Jersey Beach Profile Network Atlantic County Profile Site Locations

FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT

ST. JOSEPH PENINSULA, GULF COUNTY, FLORIDA Beach Re-Nourishment and Environmental Enhancement Project RECOMMENDATIONS

CROSS-SHORE SEDIMENT PROCESSES

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

Climate Change Impacts to KSC Launch Complex

2013 ANNUAL REPORT - TO THE CITY OF NORTH WILDWOOD ON THE CONDITION OF THE CITY BEACHES

2014 ANNUAL REPORT - TO THE CITY OF NORTH WILDWOOD ON THE CONDITION OF THE CITY BEACHES

2018 Annual Beach Monitoring Report

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

ALTERNATIVES FOR COASTAL STORM DAMAGE MITIGATION AND FUNCTIONAL DESIGN OF COASTAL STRUCTURES

Beach Nourishment Impact on Beach Safety and Surfing in the North Reach of Brevard County, Florida

FINAL REPORT FOR 2013 ON THE CONDITION OF THE MUNICIPAL BEACHES IN THE TOWNSHIP OF UPPER, CAPE MAY COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

Figure 106. Locations of the 28 NJBPN profile stations in Ocean County, NJ.

Long Term Success and Future Approach of the Captiva and Sanibel Islands Beach Renourishment Program

Salt Ponds Shore Zone Modeling for Breakwater Placement: Summary Report

SACO RIVER AND CAMP ELLIS BEACH SACO, MAINE SECTION 111 SHORE DAMAGE MITIGATION PROJECT APPENDIX F ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT

Coastal Hazards and Management in North Carolina. Braxton Davis April 14, 2015

Beach Profiles. Topics. Module 9b Beach Profiles and Crossshore Sediment Transport 3/23/2016. CE A676 Coastal Engineering

ADAPTATION TO SEA LEVEL RISE AND COASTAL IMPACTS

Figure 38. Locations of the 28 NJBPN profile stations in Ocean County, NJ.

SPECIAL SPRING 2018 STORM REPORT ON THE CONDITION OF THE MUNICIPAL BEACHES FOR THE BOROUGH OF STONE HARBOR, CAPE MAY COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

STATUS REPORT FOR THE SUBMERGED REEF BALL TM ARTIFICIAL REEF SUBMERGED BREAKWATER BEACH STABILIZATION PROJECT FOR THE GRAND CAYMAN MARRIOTT HOTEL

SHORE PROTECTION PROJECT Pinellas County, FL

ATLANTIC COUNTY 2006 to 2008

Coastal Sediment Transport Modeling Ocean Beach & San Francisco Bight, CA

Performance of Upham Beach T-Groin Project and Its Impact to the Downdrift Beach

Photo by: Darryl Hatheway, 2011

2015 ANNUAL REPORT - TO THE CITY OF NORTH WILDWOOD ON THE CONDITION OF THE CITY BEACHES

STATE OF THE COAST 2016 Coastal Frontiers Corporation June 1, 2017

Dune Monitoring Data Update Summary: 2013

April 7, Prepared for: The Caribbean Disaster Emergency Response Agency Prepared by: CEAC Solutions Co. Ltd.

CHAPTER 281 INFLUENCE OF NEARSHORE HARDBOTTOM ON REGIONAL SEDIMENT TRANSPORT

A Preliminary Review of Beach Profile and Hardbottom Interactions

SHOREHAM BEACH LOCAL NATURE RESERVE

Beach, dune and development in the Borough of Mantoloking as of January Prepared for The Borough of Mantoloking: April 2, 2008

Figure 38. Locations of the 28 NJBPN profile stations in Ocean County, NJ.

2018 Beach Preservation Project Information

Recycling of Surplus Sand to Extend the Time Between Beach Fill Episodes

PREPARED FOR: THE BOROUGH OF AVALON 3100 DUNE DRIVE AVALON, NJ 08202

FEMA Region V. Great Lakes Coastal Flood Study. Pilot Study Webinar. Berrien County, Michigan. February 26, 2014

Assateague Island National Seashore North End Restoration Project Timeline

Navarre Beach & Dune Restoration Project Status Report to be regularly updated June 17, 2016 Report

4/20/17. #31 - Coastal Erosion. Coastal Erosion - Overview

The 2017 Panama City Beaches Beach Interim Renourishment Project. Answers to Common Questions

Delaware Chapter Surfrider Foundation - Indian River Inlet Monitoring

Regular Workshop October 20, 2014 Agenda Item: Dr. Albert E. Browder, PE; Olsen Associates, Inc.

Beach Nourishment, Static Lines, and Static Line Exceptions

A REVIEW OF THE CONDITION OF THE MUNICIPAL BEACHES AS A RESULT OF HURRICANE SANDY IN THE BOROUGH OF STONE HARBOR, CAPE MAY COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

Figure 41. Locations of the 28 NJBPN profile stations in Ocean County, NJ.

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ON BROWARD COUNTY SHORE PROTECTION PROJECT SEGMENTS II AND III BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

FINAL REPORT FOR 2009 ON THE CONDITION OF THE MUNICIPAL OCEANFRONT BEACHES IN THE BOROUGH OF AVALON, CAPE MAY COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

Effectiveness of Beach Nourishment in Response to Sea Level Rise

Beach Dune Performance Assessment of. New Jersey Beach Profile Network (NJBPN) Sites at. Long Beach Island, New Jersey. After Hurricane Sandy

Chapter 15 SEASONAL CHANGES IN BEACHES OP THE NORTH ATLANTIC COAST OF THE UNITED STATES

23- Year Sand Volume Changes at Site 132, 15th Street, Brigantine

Sussex County, DE Preliminary Study Overview

Sea Level Rise and Coastal Flooding Why Waves Matter!

The purpose and needs of the Figure Eight Island Inlet and Shoreline Management Project are as follows:

Louisiana CPRA SJB Group, Baton Rouge Coastal Engineering Consultants U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Federal and State PDT Members

Inlet Management Study for Pass-A-Grille and Bunces Pass, Pinellas County, Florida

RI Regulatory Setbacks & Buffers: Coastal Management Issues

Changes in Beach Profile and Grain Size after Beach Renourishment

Coastal Erosion Impact on Rincón Infrastructure

Follets Island Nearshore Beach Nourishment Project

Absecon Island Shore Protection The planning behind the project

2016 NC Coastal Local Governments Annual Meeting

SELECTION OF THE PREFERRED MANAGEMENT OPTION FOR STOCKTON BEACH APPLICATION OF 2D COASTAL PROCESSES MODELLING

Chapter 11. Beach Fill and Soft Engineering Structures

Trusted Partners Delivering Value, Today and Tomorrow BUILDING STRONG

OCEAN COUNTY 2006 to 2008

Anguilla. Wise practices for coping with. i b bea n Se a

FINAL REPORT FOR 2012 ON THE CHANGES SEEN ON THE OCEANFRONT BEACHES

Transcription:

Tracking No. 00.00.2010 Erosion Mitigation And Shoreline Management Feasibility Study Town of Duck, North Carolina Coastal Planning & Engineering of North Carolina February 28, 2013 Ken Willson 1

Tracking No. 00.00.2010 2 Goals of the Study Evaluate shoreline changes along entire town Develop a long term shoreline management strategy for the entire Town Investigate the cause, extent, and severity of the chronic erosion area or Hot Spot just north of the Research Pier Develop an erosion mitigation strategy to address this Hot Spot Evaluate Storm Damage Vulnerability*

Tracking No. 00.00.2010 3 Shoreline Change Analysis Shoreline Segment Transect Grouping Boundaries by Landmark (Approximate) Shoreline Length (ft) 1 9 to 89 Dolphin Run to 9th Ave. 8,000 2 89 to 149 9th Ave. to Four Seasons Drive 6,000 3 149 to 169 Four Seasons Drive to Duck Landing Ln. 2,000 4 169 to 209 Duck Landing Ln. to Ships Watch Dr. 4,000 5 209 to 229 Ships Watch Drive to FRF Pier 2,000 6 229 to 239 FRF Pier to N. FRF Property Line 1,000 7 239 to 289 N. FRF Property Line to Dianne St. 5,000 8 289 to 369 Dianne St. to Martin Ln. 8,000 9 369 to 389 Martin Ln. to Sanderling Resort 2,000 10 389 to 529 Sanderling Resort to Hampton Inn 14,000

Tracking No. 00.00.2010 4 Segment 2

Tracking No. 00.00.2010 5 Segment 3 & 4

Tracking No. 00.00.2010 6 Segment 5 & 6

Tracking No. 00.00.2010 7 Segment 7

Tracking No. 00.00.2010 8 Segment 8

Tracking No. 00.00.2010 9 Segment 9

Tracking No. 00.00.2010 10 Segment 10

Shoreline Change Analysis Shoreline Segment Transect Grouping Average Shoreline Trend by Segment for 1996 to 2011 Overall Trend (ft/yr) Total Movement (ft) 1 9 to 89 +0.60 +9.1 2 89 to 149-0.36-4.7 3 149 to 169 +1.82 +27.5 4 169 to 209-1.04-15.8 5 209 to 229 +0.15 +2.2 6 229 to 239-1.68-25.4 7 239 to 289-4.82-72.9 8 289 to 369 +1.12 +15.5 9 369 to 389-0.56-8.5 10 389 to 529 +1.27 +23.7 11

Segment Number Phase 1: Coastal Process and Shoreline Impact Analysis 4: Economic Losses Due To Shoreline Change Rates Timeframe 2011-2016 2016-2021 2021-2026 2026-2041 2041-2061 Total 1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 2 4.9% 2.7% 1.4% 2.9% 5.7% 3.3% 3 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4 10.5% 7.2% 3.5% 7.3% 16.0% 8.6% 5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 7 82.8% 89.6% 94.9% 89.4% 77.4% 87.4% 8 1.0% 0.3% 0.2% 0.3% 0.6% 0.4% 9 0.6% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.3% 0.2% 10 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Total $6,631,267 $9,235,952 $19,255,065 $27,786,350 $18,688,323 $81,596,958 12

Tracking No. 00.00.2010 Conceptual Alternatives No Action Alternative Retreat Beach Restoration By Truck Haul Dune Replenishment By Truck Haul Erosion Mitigation Project By Offshore Dredging Storm Damage Reduction Project By Offshore Dredging 13

Tracking No. 00.00.2010 14 Beach Fill (Truck Haul):

Tracking No. 00.00.2010 Beach Fill (Truck Haul): $1.5 Million - $2 Million 60,000 cy of Fill 30-90 day construction period Placed along 5,000 ft. of Hot Spot Provide 1 year of erosion mitigation and some fill along the adjacent beaches. 15

Tracking No. 00.00.2010 Dune Fill (Truck Haul): $815,000 30,000 cy of Fill 5 7 months permitting 30 day construction period Placed along 5,000 ft. of Hot Spot Provide 1 year of erosion mitigation 16

Tracking No. 00.00.2010 Beach Fill (dredge and fill): Nags Head style project. ~ 842,000 cy of fill Offshore borrow area Placed along most of segment 7 and 8 Tapers to minimize spreading losses. Provide ~ 5 years of erosion mitigation. $11.35 Million - $14 Million Limited storm damage reduction 17

Tracking No. 00.00.2010 18 Storm Damage Reduction Before Fran (After Bertha) USGS After Fran USGS

Tracking No. 00.00.2010 19

ELEVATION PROFILE EVOLUTION OF BEACH NOURISHMENT 10 0-10 -20-30 -200 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 DISTANCE 20

ELEVATION PROFILE EVOLUTION OF BEACH NOURISHMENT 10 Nourishment 0-10 -20-30 -200 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 DISTANCE 21

ELEVATION PROFILE EVOLUTION OF BEACH NOURISHMENT 10 Nourishment 0-10 Design Beach -20-30 -200 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 DISTANCE 22

ELEVATION PROFILE EVOLUTION OF BEACH NOURISHMENT 10 Nourishment 0-10 Design Beach -20-30 -200 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 DISTANCE 23

ELEVATION PROFILE EVOLUTION OF BEACH NOURISHMENT 10 Post-Construction Adjustment in 1-3 years 0-10 Design Beach -20-30 -200 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 DISTANCE 24

ELEVATION PROFILE EVOLUTION OF BEACH NOURISHMENT 10 Advance Fill 0-10 Design Beach -20-30 -200 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 DISTANCE 25

ELEVATION PROFILE EVOLUTION OF BEACH NOURISHMENT 10 0-10 -20 Design Beach Loss of Advance Fill In 5-10 years -30-200 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 DISTANCE 26

ELEVATION PROFILE EVOLUTION OF BEACH NOURISHMENT 10 0-10 Design Beach -20-30 -200 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 DISTANCE 27

ELEVATION PROFILE EVOLUTION OF BEACH NOURISHMENT 10 0-10 Design Beach -20-30 -200 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 DISTANCE 28

ELEVATION PROFILE EVOLUTION OF BEACH NOURISHMENT 10 0-10 Design Beach -20-30 -200 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 DISTANCE 29

ELEVATION PROFILE EVOLUTION OF BEACH NOURISHMENT 10 Post-Construction Adjustment in 1-3 years 0-10 Design Beach -20-30 -200 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 DISTANCE 30

31

32 Approx. February 1993 Wet/Dry Line

33 Approx. February 1993 Wet/Dry Line

34

35

36 SBEACH Storm-induced BEAch CHange Model Simulates cross-shore erosion of the dune, berm, and foreshore caused by storm waves and water levels

Elevation (feet, NAVD) 37 25 20 SBEACH Change at Profile 39+04 Starting Condition 15 10 5 0-5 -10-15 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Distance from Monument (feet)

Elevation (feet, NAVD) 38 25 20 SBEACH Change at Profile 39+04 Post 50-Year Storm Condition 15 10 5 0-5 -10-15 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Distance from Monument (feet)

Elevation (feet, NAVD) 39 25 20 SBEACH Change at Profile 39+04 Post 50-Year Storm Condition 15 10 5 0-5 -10-15 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Distance from Monument (feet)

Elevation (feet, NAVD) 40 25 20 SBEACH Change at Profile 39+04 Starting Condition 15 10 5 0-5 -10-15 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Distance from Monument (feet)

Elevation (feet, NAVD) 41 25 20 15 20 Ft. Width SBEACH Change at Profile 39+04 Starting Condition with Beach Fill Design 15 Ft. Elevation 10 100 Ft. Wide Berm 5 0-5 -10-15 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Distance from Monument (feet)

Elevation (feet, NAVD) 42 25 20 SBEACH Change at Profile 39+04 Starting Condition with Beach Fill Design 15 10 5 0-5 -10-15 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Distance from Monument (feet)

Elevation (feet, NAVD) 43 25 20 SBEACH Change at Profile 39+04 Post 50-Year Storm Condition 15 10 5 0-5 -10-15 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Distance from Monument (feet)

Elevation (feet, NAVD) 44 25 20 SBEACH Change at Profile 39+04 Post 50-Year Storm Condition 15 10 5 0-5 -10-15 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Distance from Monument (feet)

Elevation (feet, NAVD) 45 25 20 SBEACH Change at Profile 39+04 Post 50-Year Storm Condition 15 10 5 0-5 -10-15 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Distance from Monument (feet)

Elevation (feet, NAVD) 46 25 20 SBEACH Change at Profile 39+04 Starting Condition 15 10 5 0-5 -10-15 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Distance from Monument (feet)

85M102006D SBEACH Storm Damage Analysis H S T p Water Level Return Period (ft.) (s) (ft. NAVD) 1 17.6 9.9 4 5 21.2 12.9 4.2 10 22.7 14.2 4.8 20 24.3 15.5 5.7 25 24.8 16 5.8 50 26.3 17.3 6.2 H S Measured Data T p Storm Date (ft) (s) Water Level (ft. NAVD) Approximate Return Period (years) H S T p Water Level Perfect Storm Oct-91 15.1 22.5 4 < 1 > 50 1 Hurricane Isabel Sep-03 27.3 15.6 5.6 >50 20 10 to 20 Hurricane Irene Aug-11 24.8 13.6 3 25 5 to 10 < 1 Hurricane Sandy Oct-12 17.3 13.3 4.5 ~ 1 5 to 10 5 to 10

SBEACH Storm Damage Analysis Shoreline Length Structures Construction Impacted during Volume Storm Required Event for under Storm Existing Event (CY) Conditions Segment Segment (ft) 1-Year 5-Year 10-Year 20-Year 25-Year 50-Year 1 8,0001 - - - -- -- - - 2 6,0002 - - - -- -- 508,000 2 508,000 2 3 2,0003 - - - -- 363,800 1 116,700 1 198,500 2 4 4,0004 - - - -- 443,600 1 443,600 1 443,600 8 5 2,0005 - - - -- -- - - 6 1,0006 - - - -- -- - - 7 5,0007 651,400 15 1,000,800 19 1,000,800 23 1,018,300 27 1,018,300 32 1,157,300 36 8 8,0008 609,400 2 609,400 6 609,400 14 1,072,500 20 1,294,900 22 1,334,900 23 9 2,0009 - - - -- - - - 10 14,000 10 - - - -- - - - Total: 1,260,800 1,610,200 1,610,200 2,898,200 3,381,500 3,642,300 Total (7 & 8): 1,260,800 1,610,200 1,610,200 2,090,800 2,313,200 2,492,200

85M102006D Sand Sources

85M102006D Sand Sources (Boss & Hoffman, 2001)

85M102006D Sand Sources (Boss & Hoffman, 2001)

85M102006D Sand Sources

85M102006D Deliverables: Report to be submitted to Town by March 29 th Final Updates to Conceptual Alternatives Final Recommendations

85M102006D Conceptual Alternative Summary Plan Project Extent Volume of Sand (CY) Sand Source Project Life Cost (x $1,000,000) Dune Replenishment Beach Replenishment Long-Term Erosion Mitigation Project 10 Year Storm Damage Reduction Project 20 Year Storm Damage Reduction Project 25 Year Storm Damage Reduction Project Segment 7 (5000 Feet) Segment 7 (5000 Feet) Segment 7 & 8 (13,000 Feet) Segment 7 & 8 (13,000 Feet) Segment 7 & 8 (13,000 Feet) Segment 7 & 8 (13,000 Feet) 30,000 Truck Haul 1 Year 0.85 60,000 Truck Haul 1 Year 1.5-2 842,000 Offshore 5 Years 11.35-14 1,610,000 Offshore 5 Years 18.75-22.5 2,091,000 Offshore 5 Years 23.35-27.75 2,313,000 Offshore 5 Years 25.5-30.25

55 Thank You For Your Time!! Questions? Ken Willson Kenneth.Willson@CBI.com