CARCASS AND MEAT QUALITY OF STRAIGHTBRED AND CROSSBRED RABBITS

Similar documents
M. G. Keane, Teagasc, Grange Beef Research Centre, Dunsany, Co. Meath, Ireland.

DanBred Breeding objectives and results

Comparison of Feedlot Performance and Carcass Traits of Charolais and Brahman Sired Three-Breed Cross Calves

Meat Goat. & Fabrication Guide

R.B. THIESSEH and ST. C.S. TAYLOR, U.K.

Salers 2015 Sire Summary Definitions

S I cti n Evaluation

EVALUATION OF THE PROGENY OF BEEF SIRES DIFFERING IN GENETIC MERIT

CHARACTERIZATION OF DIFFERENT BIOLOGICAL TYPES OF STEERS (CYCLE IV): RETAIL PRODUCT YIELDS 1. T. L. Wheeler, M. E. Dikeman, L. V.

EBVS are LESSONS FROM THE ASBP / 2. EBVs of Bulls Entered in the ASBP have provided a reliable Prediction of the Performance of their Progeny

-- Results and Discussion

COMMERCIAL BEEF SIRE SELECTION

Relationships of Hip Height Measurements with Growth and Carcass Traits of Crossbred and Angus Cattle

POSTWEANING PERFORMANCE AND CARCASS MERIT OF PUREBRED AND TWO-BREED CROSS PIGS

Unit A: Introduction to Cattle Management. Lesson 2: Exploring the Dairy Industry

Selecting Beef Bulls

2018 State Fair of Virginia Lamb Carcass Evaluation Scott P. Greiner, Ph.D. Extension Animal Scientist, Sheep Virginia Tech

Evaluation of Dorset, Finnsheep, Romanov, Texel, and Montadale breeds of sheep: IV. Survival, growth, and carcass traits of F 1 lambs 1,2

c o m e re a l s ine p ro d uctio n

Genetic & Breeding Concepts Sheep and Goat Expo 2017 San Angelo

Bull Buyer s Guide. $3000 Purchase Price of New Bull Salvage Value of Old Bull (1900 lbs. X 1.10/lb.) $ 910 Net Cost of New Bull

Lesson 2: Exploring the Dairy Industry

Use of biotechnology to improve muscle growth in aquaculture species: Preliminary results on the use of myostatin in tilapia

SWINE BREEDING SYSTEMS

Contemporary Grouping for Beef Cattle Genetic Evaluation

IOWA 4-H LIVESTOCK JUDGING CONTEST

The new stress negative Pietrain line developed at the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine of the University of Liege.

2018 NATIONAL PICTURE JUDGING CONTEST

Yellow Perch Broodstock. Geoff Wallat, Aquaculture Specialist

CALF PERFORMANCE AND COW WEIGHT AND CONDITION FOR COWS SIRED BY HIGH AND LOW MILK EPD ANGUS AND POLLED HEREFORD BULLS

EC Selection and Crossbreeding for Commercial Pork Production

Effects of Creep Feeding on Preweaning and Postweaning Performance Of Angus x Hereford Calves

Crossbreeding Beef Cattle Scott P. Greiner, Extension Animal Scientist, Virginia Tech

PERFORMANCE OF LIGHT WEIGHT STOCKER CALVES GRAZING SUMMER NATIVE RANGE WITH 25 OR 40% PROTEIN SUPPLEMENTS

138 Trop Anim Prod :2

Calving Season & Cow Efficiency

CHALLENGES OF MARKETING NON-NATIVE DEER AND VENISON PRODUCTS. Dr. Greg Clary 1

Hair Shedding Scores Relating to Maternal Traits and Productivity in Beef Cattle. An Undergraduate Honors Thesis in the. Animal Science Department

CHARACTERIZATION OF BIOLOGICAL TYPES OF CATTLE III. CARCASS COMPOSITION, QUALITY AND PALATABILITY

Carcass grading system in Lithuania

Effective Management Practices to Reduce the Incidence of Ascites in Broilers


EVALUATION OF PUREBREDS AND TWO- BREED CROSSES IN SWINE: FEEDLOT PERFORMANCE AND CARCASS MERIT

Principles of Livestock Judging. University of Florida 2009 Coaches Clinic Handout

Danish Yorkshire (Large White)

Your Name Your Parent s Name Your Mailing Address Age Grade in School Name of School Number of Years in Rabbit Project Number of Years in 4-H Name of

Annex 9 Processes Quality Control. Introduction

AT ONE TIME, cattle were hunted for food. Then, during the Stone Age in Europe and

BELGIAN BLUE, THE CROSSBREEDING SPECIALIST BREED

Introduction. Sharp knife Disposable gloves Antiseptic wipes/hand wash Means of suspending carcass (if appropriate) Plastic bags Record book

Test Results Summary. Owner: Darby Dan Farm 8 th Nov Distance Plus (USA) v1.0. Distance Plus (SAF) v1.0. Distance Plus (ANZ) v1.

ABSTRACT. Those five experiment series of research were:

Winter Nutrition. of Fall-Calving Cows and Calves. in cooperation with. Agricultural Experiment Station Oregon State University, Corvallis

An Analysis of Beef Cattle Conformation

Comparison of the Brahman and Friesian breeds as sires for beef production in New Zealand

Improving carcase and beef quality in Bos indicus through crossbreeding

WHAT IS a sheep? What is a goat? Are they the same

Traits of the breed Double muscle factor

The Bonsmara. The System Behind A Superior Breed. TEL (+27) FAX (+27)

JUVENILE GENETIC EVALUATION AND SELECTION FOR DAIRY GOATS

1-634 TEXAS AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION SERVICE THE TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM. John E. Hutchison, Dilectol, College Statloll, Texas

Comparative performance of purebred and crossbred swine on Pennsylvania farms

INFLUENCE OF TRAFFIC FLOW SEPARATION DEVICES ON ROAD SAFETY IN BRAZIL S MULTILANE HIGHWAYS

The Effects of Chronic Creatine Supplementation on Performance and Body Composition of Female Athletes. by Megan Brenner

The Economics of Finishing Bison

State and national standardized lactation averages by breed for cows calving in 2013

Effect of Different Feeds on the Reproductive Performance of Clarias Batrachus (1758)

Illinois 4-H Livestock (Beef, Sheep & Swine) Judging Contest

CSA Genetic Evaluation

Impact of butchers and market trends on the integrity of small ruminant genetic resources

Aim of breeding work

Phenotypic Standard of. Australian Brahman Cattle. Compiled by the Australian Brahman Breeders Association Ltd VERSION 06

Understanding and Using Performance Data in Judging Classes

Characterization of Boxed Beef Value in Angus Sires

Across-Herd Genetic Evaluation of Swine

Evaluation of sire lines: G Performer and Shade Oak Duroc and dam lines: F1 SEPQ and Fertilis th and 26 th station trials

Value of Black Hereford Registration

Length of the Ranch-of-Origin Weaning Period Does Not Affect Post-Receiving Growth or Carcass Merit of Ranch-Direct, Early-Weaned Beef Calves

EXPECTED PROGENY DIFFERENCES

Value of Black Hereford Registration

Breeding values for beef sires based on beef dairy crossbred offspring

GENETICS OF RACING PERFORMANCE IN THE AMERICAN QUARTER HORSE: II. ADJUSTMENT FACTORS AND CONTEMPORARY GROUPS 1'2

Performance Data Reporting and Contemporary Grouping For Beef Cattle Genetic Evaluation

Terms to Know.

of Nebraska - Lincoln

Increasing Profits per Acre with Appropriate Genetics

Simmental the most improved breed over the last 25 years!

CSA Genetic Evaluation

EC More Profit through Systematic... Crossbreeding of Hogs

An Update on Bison Genetics and Genomics"

Analysis of Estimated Breeding Values for Marble Score, Carcase Weight and the Terminal Carcase Index

The role genetics plays in achieving the perfect MSA Index. Tim Emery - Technical Officer (TBTS)

Selecting Swine TEKS: 130.2(C)(12)(D)

Effect of Postweaning Health on Feedlot Performance and Quality Grade

2005 National Picture Judging Contest

CARCASS MERIT NON-CONFORMANCE IN THE OK STEER FEEDOUT PROGRAM. S.L. Northcuttl, H.G. Dolezal2, G.A. Highfill3, F.K. Ray4and C.W. Shearharts.

DanAvl Breeding Programme

Judging Swine. Step one to becoming a successful swine judge is to learn the parts of the body. Parts of the Swine

EAAP - FEZ - EVT 51 th Meeting of the EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION FOR ANIMAL PRODUCTION The Hague - The Netherlands August 2000

NORDLUS Short presentation

Transcription:

CARCASS AND MEAT QUALITY OF STRAIGHTBRED AND CROSSBRED RABBITS BIANOSPINO E. 1, MOURA A.S.A.M.T. 1, WECHSLER F.S. 1, FERNANDES, S. 1, ROÇA R.O. 2 1 Departamento de Produção e Exploração Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, UNESP, Botucatu-SP, 18618-000, Brazil. 2 Departamento de Gestão e Tecnologia Agroindustrial, Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas, UNESP, Botucatu-SP, 18618-000, Brazil anamoura@fca.unesp.br ABSTRACT The objective was to evaluate the effects of the genetic group (straightbred vs crossbred) and age on carcass quality of rabbits. A total of 128 straightbred Botucatu and Botucatu x White German Giant crossbred rabbits, males and females, were involved in the study. Young rabbits were weaned at 35 days and sequentially slaughtered, four per genetic group x sex combination, at: 42, 49, 56, 63, 70, 77, 84 and 91 days of age. A 2 X 2 factorial arrangement in a split-plot design was employed. Commercial carcasses were heavier and reference carcasses tended to be heavier in crossbred rabbits throughout the experiment (1284 vs 1229 g and 1036 vs 1000 g, respectively, P<0.05), but when the data were corrected for slaughter weight, differences became non significant. No genetic group effect was detected on dissectible fat weight, both not adjusted and adjusted for slaughter weight. Loin and fore part were heavier in crossbreds (309 vs 296 g, P = 0.0511 and 298 vs 283 g, P<0.05, respectively); these differences also became non significant with the adjustment for slaughter weight. No genetic group effect was detected for hind part weight. Non adjusted weights of kidneys, liver and thoracic viscera were larger in the crossbred genetic group (12.5 vs 11.8 g, 73.2 vs 68.3 g, and 30.8 vs 26.2 g, respecti vely; P<0.05). After the adjustment for slaughter weight, only the weight of thoracic viscera remained significantly heavier in crossbreds (30.4 vs 28.6 g). No effect of genetic group was detected on meat to bone ratio and muscle ultimate ph (phu). With the exception of hind part weight adjusted for slaughter weight, all other traits showed age effects. Muscle phu oscillated between 5.49 and 5.70, whereas commercial and reference carcass weights ranged from 544.1 to 1492 g and 696.4 to 1798 g, and meat to bone ratio from 5.10 to 8.47, between 42 and 91 days of age. Dissectible fat represented 2.11% of the reference carcass at 42 days and 3.38% at 91 days of age. Crossbreeding may be recommended for the production of prime retail cuts. For a minimum reference carcass weight of 1 kg, slaughter should take place between 63 and 70 days of age. Key words: rabbit, carcass traits, retail cuts, muscle phu. 1354

INTRODUCTION Increasing rabbit meat consumption has been a challenge in the last few years. High prices associated with lack of interest in whole carcasses have contributed to this situation. The development of processed products such as retail cuts and precooked meals is an attempt to meet the changing demand. Knowledge about carcass traits such as weight and percentage of prime retail cuts and meat to bone ratio are essential for this new market. According to BLASCO and OUHAYOUN (1996) first retail cuts are hind legs, loin and fore legs. Proportion of loin ranges from 23 to 28% and of hind legs from 27 a 29 % of the commercial carcass; whereas meat to bone ratio ranges from 7 to 8 (OUHAYOUN, 1989; PARIGI-BINI et al., 1992). The objective was to evaluate the effects of the genetic group (straightbred vs crossbred) and age on carcass and meat quality of rabbits. MATERIAL AND METHODS The experiment was carried out in the Rabbit Production Unit of Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia da UNESP, Campus de Botucatu, SP, Brazil, from March through May, 2003. Initially, 144 weaned rabbits, males and females, were caged in flat deck wire cages, fitted with nipple drinkers and feeders. Cages were housed in an open, east-west oriented building protected with plastic adjustable curtains. Rabbits were randomly assigned to treatments, nine per cage, according to genetic group and sex, at weaning (35 days of age). Only 128 animals were, in fact, involved in the study; the remaining 16 (one per cage) were included with the objective of replacing possible mortality losses. Half of the rabbits were from the Botucatu strain and half were products of crossbreeding between Botucatu females and White German Giant males from a commercial producer. The Botucatu genetic group is a synthetic strain, originated from Norfolk 2000 hybrids (MOURA et al., 2000). According to that breeding company, Norfolk hybrids originated from a two generation crossbreeding program involving the New Zealand White, Californian and Bouscat Giant breeds. The German Giant breed is heavier and assumed to be later maturing than the Botucatu strain. Animals had free access to feed and water. A pelleted feed was formulated according to DE BLAS and MATEOS (1998) and produced on campus. At 42, 49, 56, 63, 70, 77, 84, 91 days of age all rabbits were weighed; one was randomly taken from each cage (four per treatment) for slaughter. Slaughter took place at the Experimental Chicken Slaughter House on campus. A neck hit was followed by jugular vein bleeding. 1355

Hot carcasses including head, thoracic viscera (heart, lungs, trachea, oesophagus and thymus), liver and kidneys were packed in plastic bags, chilled with crushed ice, and kept in the refrigerator at 4 º C for 24 hours. Commercial chilled carcass weight and reference carcass weight were recorded according to BLASCO and OUHAYOUN (1996). Dissectible fat (scapular, perirenal, and inguinal deposits), as well as thoracic viscera, liver, and kidneys were weighed in an analytical scale. First retail cuts (fore legs plus thoracic cage, hind legs, and loin) were obtained by cutting carcasses at the technological joints (BLASCO and OUHAYOUN, 1996). The left hind leg was used for meat to bone ratio evaluation. The ultimate ph (phu) was determined on the left Longissimus dorsi muscle. A 2 X 2 factorial arrangement in a split-plot design was employed. Two analyses of carcass traits, except for meat to bone ratio, were performed: not adjusted and adjusted for slaughter weight, by means of the MIXED procedure of SAS (1996). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Commercial carcasses were heavier and reference carcasses tended to be heavier in crossbred rabbits throughout the experiment, but when the means were corrected for slaughter weight, differences became non significant (Table 1). This is an indication that differences in carcass weight were mostly due to body weight differences. Head, which is included in the commercial carcass, but not in the reference carcass, was heavier in crossbreds; a trend persisted even after the correction for preslaughter weight. No differences between genetic groups were detected for dissectible fat weight, both uncorrected and corrected for preslaughter weight. Loin and fore part were heavier in crossbreds, whereas no difference between genetic groups was detected for the hind part. After the correction for slaughter weight, those differences became non significant. Uncorrected weights of kidneys, liver and thoracic viscera were larger in the crossbred genetic group. After the correction for preslaughter weight, thoracic viscera still remained heavier in crossbreds. No effect of genetic group was detected on meat to bone ratio and muscle phu. Under a commercial point of view, the most valuable retail cut is the loin, followed by the hind part. Percentage of loin and hind part (relative to the reference carcass) did not differ between genetic gro ups, whereas fore part percentage tended to be larger in crossbreds (28.8 vs 28.4%, P = 0.0528). This finding is consistent with the heavier thoracic viscera depicted for crossbreds, and may be an indication of increased cardiorespiratory capacity in this group. There is no indication of difference in the degree of maturity between groups, given that no genetic group x age interaction was detected for any trait. There was an age x sex interaction for hind part weight (P<0.05); males exceeded females from 49 to 63 days of age, whereas from 63 to 77 days females exceeded males for this trait (Figure 1). Males had more developed heads than females (117 vs 114 g, P<0.05), both corrected and 1356

uncorrected for slaughter weight. Heavier heads may be interpreted as secondary sexual characteristics of male rabbits. The weights of liver and kidneys, corrected for slaughter weight, were also larger in males (72.8 vs 68.8 g, P<0.05, and 12.4 vs 11.9 g, P<0.05, respectively). Table 1. Least-squares means of carcass quality traits, uncorrected and corrected for slaughter weight, according to genetic group Trait Uncorrected Corrected Straight Crossbred Prob. Straight Crossbred Prob. bred bred Commercial carcass (g) 1229 1284 0.0188 1253 1261 0.2927 Reference carcass (g ) 1000 1036 0.0638 1020 1017 0.7173 Head weight (g) 112.4 117.7 0.0044 113.6 116.6 0.0552 Dissectible fat (g) 27.3 27.4 0.9807 29.3 26.5 0.1435 Fore part (g) A 283.3 297.9 0.0120 289.3 292.4 0.1668 Loin (g) 295.5 308.7 0.0511 300.9 303.3 0.4796 Hind part (g) 401.4 412.4 0.1221 408.9 405.6 0.4707 Meat to bone ratio 7.03 7.04 0.8921 Kidneys (g) 11.8 12.5 0.0115 12.0 12.4 0.1138 Liver (g) 68.3 73.2 0.0437 70.0 71.7 0.3524 Thoracic viscera (g) B 28.2 30.8 0.0012 28.6 30.4 0.0144 phu 5.58 5.61 0.3354 5.58 5.61 0.2134 A Fore legs plus thoracic cage B. Heart, lungs, trachea, oesophagus and thymus With the exception of fore part percentage and hind part weight corrected for slaughter weight, all other traits showed age effects (P<0.05, see Figure 1 for reference carcass traits). Muscle phu did not show a clear trend with age, oscillating between 5.49 and 5.70, from 42 through 91 days of age. These results are unexpected because the combination of an increase in glycolytic metabolism and a decrease in oxi dative activity during muscle growth should be accompanied by phu lowering (DALLE ZOTTE and OUHAYOUN, 1995). PLA et al. (1998) reported values for muscular ph ranging from 5.61 to 5.63 for three lines and liveweights ranging from 1800 to 2300 g. Reference carcass weight ranged from 544 g at 42 days to 1101 g at 70 days to 1492 g at 91 days of age. Meat to bone ratio ranged from 5.10 to 7.88 to 8.47, respectively, at the same ages. These latter values compare favorably to those reported by PLA et al. (1998) from 4.16 to 4.87 for three lines and liveweights ranging from 1800 to 2300 g. 1357

Dissectible fat represented 2.11% of the reference carcass at 42 days and 3.38% at 91 days of age. A more pronounced increase in fat weight occurred after 70 days, when it corresponded to 2.22% of the reference carcass. These values are compatible with that of 2.5% reported by PLA et al. (1996) for the precocious strain R, at a liveweight of 2 kg. Reference carcass weight 1600 1 1200 1000 800 600 Fore part weight 500 300 200 100 0 Loin weight 500 300 200 100 0 700 600 500 300 200 100 0 Hind part weight Males Females 9 Meat to bone ratio 55 Dissectible fat 8 45 Ratio 7 6 5 4 3 35 25 15 5 Figure 1. Effect of age on reference carcass. Curves were drawn according to significant interactions in the statistical analyses: two curves for genetic group x age interaction and one curve for no interaction 1358

Crossbreeding may be recommended for the production of retail cuts because products provided heavier carcasses and loins, without increased fatness. For a minimum reference carcass weight of 1 kg, slaughter should take place between 63 and 70 days of age. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work was supported by the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, FAPESP, SP, Brazil. The authors thank Mrs. I. F. Arruda, M. C. Francisco and C. Bulhões for technical assistance. REFERENCES BLASCO A., OUHAYOUN J. Harmonization of criteria and terminology in rabbit meat research. Revised proposal. World Rabbit Sci. 4 (2), 93-99, 1 996. DE BLAS C., MATEOS G.G. 1998. Feed Formulation. In: The Nutrition of the rabbit. (Edit. De Blas C. E, Wiserman J.). Cambridge: CABI publishing, pp.250. DALLE ZOTTE A., OUHAYOUN J. 1995. Postweaning evolution of muscle energy metabolism and related physico-chemical traits in the rabbit. Meat Sci. 39:395-401. MOURA A.S.A.M.T., POLASTRE R., WECHSLER F.S. 2000. Dam and litter inbreeding and environmental effects on litter performance in Botucatu rabbits. World Rabbit Sci. 8(4):151-158. OUHAYOUN J. 1989. La composition corporelle du lapin. INRA Prod. Anim. 2(3), 215-226. PARIGI BINI R., XICCATO G., CINETTO M., DALLE ZOTTE A. 1992. Effetto dell età e peso di macelazione e del sesso sulla qualità della carcassa e della carne cunicola. 1. Rlilievi di macellazione e qualità della carcassa. Zoot. Nutr. Anim. 18:157-172. PLA M., HERNANDÉZ P., BLASCO A. 1996. Carcass composition and meat characteristics of two rabbit breeds of different degrees of maturity. Meat Sci. 44:85-92. PLA M., GUERRERO L., GUARDIA D., OLIV ER M.A., BLASCO A. 1998. Carcass characteristics and meat quality of rabbit lines selected for different objectives: I. Betweem lines comparison. Livest. Prod. Sci. 54:115-123. SAS Institute 1996. Inc.,.SAS/STAT. User s procedures guide. Version 6.11, 4.ed. v.2, Cary: SAS Institute Inc. 1359